29
Ing. Tomáš Dudáš, PhD.

Main Theories of FDI

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

main theory of foreign development investment

Citation preview

  • Ing. Tom Dud, PhD.

  • Structure of the presentation

    FDI theories introduciton and main questions

    FDI theories on macro level

    Development theories of FDI

    FDI theories on micro level

    Eclectic FDI theory (OLI theory)

  • The basic questions of FDI theories (6W+H)Who? (is the investor)

    What? (kind of FDI)

    Why? (are we investing)

    Where? (is the FDI going)

    When? (do we invest)

    How? (the mode of entry)

  • FDI theories on macro levelCapital market theoryOne of the oldest theories of FDI (60s)FDI is determined by interest rates

    Dynamic macroeconomic FDI theoryFDI are a long term function of TNC strategiesThe timing of the investment depends on the changes in the macroeconomic environmenthysteresis effect

  • FDI theories on macro levelFDI theory based on exchange ratesAnalyses the relationship of FDI flows and exchange rate changesFDI as a tool of exchange rate risk reduction

    FDI theory based on economic geographyExplores the factors influencing the creation of international production clustersInnovation as a determinant of FDI Greta Garbo effect

  • FDI theories on macro levelGravity approach to FDIThe closer two countries are (geographically, economically, culturally ...) the higher will be the FDI flows between these countries

    FDI theories based on istitutional analysisExplores the importance of the institutional framework on the FDI flowsPolitical stability key factor

  • Life cycle theoryRaymond Vernon 1966

    It can be used to analyse the relationship of product life cycle and possible FDI flowsFDI can be seen mostly in the phases of maturity and decline

    The conclusions of this theory are questionable nowadays

  • Japanese FDI theoriesWere initially developed in the 70s of the last century

    Main representant Terumoto Ozawa

    He analysed the relationship of FDI, competitiveness and economic development based on the ideas of Michael Porter

    He identified three main phases of development when he analysed the waves of FDI inflow and outflow from a country

  • Japanese FDI theoriesI. phase of economic growthThe country is underdeveloped and is targeted by foreign companies wanting to use its potential advantages (especially low labour costs)Almost no outgoing FDI

    II. Phase of economic growthNew FDI is drawn by the growing internal markets and by the growing standards of livingOutgoing FDI are motivated by the raising labour costs

  • Japanese FDI theoriesIII. Phase of economic growthThe competitivness of the country is based on innovation The incoming and outgoing FDI are motivated by market factors and technological factors

  • Five Stage Theory - John Dunning

    Stage 1Low incoming FDI, but foreign companies are beginning to discover the advantages of the countryNo outgoing FDI no specific advantages owned by the domestic firms

    Stage 2Growing incoming FDI do the advantages of the country - especially the low labour costsThe standards of living are rising which is drawing more foreign companies to the countryStill low outgoing FDI

  • Five Stage Theory - John DunningStage 3Still strong incoming FDI, but their nature is changing due to the rising wagesThe outgoing FDI are taking off as domestic companies are getting stronger and develop their competitive advantages

    Stage 4Strong outgoing FDI seeking advantages abroad (low labour costs)

  • Five Stage Theory - John Dunning

    Stage 5Investment decisions are based on the strategies of TNCsThe flows of outgoing and incoming FDI come into equilibrium

  • Incoming and outgoing FDI in China between 2001-2004

  • Incoming and outgoing FDI in South Korea between 2001-2004

  • Incoming and outgoing FDI in Japan between 2001-2004

  • FDI theories on micro levelExistence of firm specific advantages (Hymer)Access to raw materialsEconomies of scaleIntangible assets such as trade names, patents, superior management etcReduced transaction costs when replacing an arm's length transaction in the market by an internal firm transaction

    FDI and oligopolistic marketsIn oligopolistic markets the companies follow the actions of the market leaderMutual threats game theory

  • FDI theories on micro levelTheory of internalisation Due to market imperfections, there may be several reasons why a firm wants to make use of its monopolistic advantage itself (or organise an activity itself)Buckley and Casson (influenced by Coase), suggested that a firm overcomes market imperfections by creating its own market - internalisationhe theory of internalisation was long regarded as a theory of why FDI occursBy internalising across national boundaries, a firm becomes multinational

  • Eclectic FDI theory John DunningJohn Dunning attempts to integrate a variety of strands of thinking

    He draws partly on macroeconomic theory and trade, as well as microeconomic theory and firm behavior (industrial economics)

  • O = Ownership advantages

    Some firms have a firm specific capital known as knowledge capital: Human capital (managers), patents, technologies, brand, reputation

    This capital can be replicated in different countries without losing its value, and easily transferred within the firm without high transaction costs

  • L Localization advantages

    Producing close to final consumers or downstream customers

    Saving transport costs

    Obtaining cheap inputs

    Jumping trade barriers

    Provide services (for most services production and delivery have to be contemporaneous)

  • OLI approach - conclusionsThe eclectic, or OLI paradigm, suggests that the greater the O and I advantages possessed by firms and the more the L advantages of creating, acquiring (or augmenting) and exploiting these advantages from a location outside its home country, the more FDI will be undertakenWhere firms possess substantial O and I advantages but the L advantages favor the home country, then domestic investment will be preferred to FDI and foreign markets will be supplies by exports

  • I internalization advantagesWhy don't a firm just sign a contract with a subcontractor (external agent) in a foreign country?Because contracting out is risky: it implies transferring the specific capital outside the firm and revealing the proprietary information (e.g. how to use the technology or the patent). Problem:If the agent interrupts the contract it can use the technology to compete with the mother companyIn the case of brands/reputation: if the agent damages the brand reputation

  • *4 types of FDI derived from OLI theory

    The typology of FDI was developed by Jere Behrman to explain the different objectives of FDI:Resource seeking FDIMarket seeking FDIEfficiency seeking (global sourcing FDI)Strategic asset/capabilities seeking FDI

  • *Resource seeking FDITo seek and secure natural resources e.g. minerals, raw materials, or lower labor costs for the investing companyFor example, a German company opening a plant in Slovakia to produce and re-export to Germany

  • *Market seeking FDITo identify and exploit new markets for the firms` finished productsUnique possibility for some type of services for which production and distribution have to be contemporaneous (telecom, water supply, energy supply)Automotive TNCs have invested heavily in China

  • *Efficiency seeking FDITo restructure its existing investments so as to achieve an efficient allocation of international economic activity of the firmsInternational specialization whereby firms seek to benefit from differences in product and factor prices and to diversify riskGlobal sourcing resource saving and improved efficiency by rationalizing the structure of their global activities. Undertaken primarily by network based MNCs with global sourcing operations.

  • *Strategic asset/capabilities seeking FDIMNCs pursue strategic operations through the purchase of existing firms and/or assets in order to protect O specific advantages in order to sustain or advance its global competitive positionAcquisition of key established local firmsAcquisition of local capabilities including R&D, knowledge and human capitalAcquisition of market knowledgePre empting market entrance by competitorsPre empting the acquisition by local firms by competitors