Scholars' Mine Scholars' Mine

Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations

1968

Magnetic after-effects in dilute transition metal alloys Magnetic after-effects in dilute transition metal alloys

Robert Henry Graham

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses

Part of the Geology Commons

Department: Department:

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Graham, Robert Henry, "Magnetic after-effects in dilute transition metal alloys" (1968). Masters Theses. 5343. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/5343

This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact scholarsmine@mst.edu.

MAGNETIC AFTER-EFFECTS IN

DILUTE TRANSITION METAL ALLOYS

BY

ROBERT HENRY GRAHAM..,. I f:/4'/-

A

THESIS

submitted to the faculty of

THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT ROLLA

132956

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the

Degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING

Rolla, 1-lissouri

1968

ii

ABSTRACT

Temperature dependent after-effects of the initial

permeability in ternary dilute ferromagnetic iron-base

alloys were studied in the temperature range of -50°0 to

+30°0. Interstitial carbon and nitrogen were the diffusing

elements. Nominal percentages of the substitutional tran­

sition elements manganese, chromium, vanadium and titanium

were added to determine the extent of substitutional-inter­

stitial pair interactions. No additional temperature depen­

dent after-effect of the initial permeability was noticed

in Fe- substitutional -c alloys, while such after-effects

were present in Fe- substitutional -N alloys. Magnetic

after-effect data were analyzed on the basis of single Debye

relaxations. Relaxation times for carbon and nitrogen dif­

rusion in alpha-iron. were calculated using activation ener­

gies of 20,100 cal/mole and 17,700 cal/mole, respectively.

Magnetic after-ef.fect data were discussed on the basis of

additional strain components and electronic interactions

caused by the variation of the substitutional element. It

was concluded that electronic interactions cause the extra

disaccommodation in Fe- substitutional -N alloys while the

larger lattice distortion around carbon renders the

inrluence or the substitutional on the interstitial mobil­

ity inerrective.

iii

iv

ACKNOv/LEDGMENT

The author wishes to respect~ully acknowledge the com­

petent and ever-available assistance given to him by his

research advisor, Dr. Man~red Wuttig, throughout this inves­

tigation.

Recognition is also given to the Department or Metal­

lurgical Engineering and the Alcoa Foundation ~or rinancial

assistance.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

ACKNO\'lLEDGMENT. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

LIST OF TABLES. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

I.

II.

III.

IV.

INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW. • • • •

EXPERIHENTAL PROCEDURE.

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS. •

DISCUSSION •••••••

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • • • • • •

• • • • • • •

• • • • • • •

V. CONCLUSIONS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

BIBLIOGRAPHY. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

VITA. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• •

• •

• •

• •

• •

• •

• •

• •

v

Page

ii

iv

vi

vii

1

14 20

28

31

32

33

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Figures

1.

2.

Iron bee unit cell with three energetically and crysta11ographically equivalent interstitial octahedral sites. • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • Strain versus time ~or an anelastic specimen. Load is applied.at t 1 and removed at t 2 ••• • • •

Distribution of interstitial dipoles a) ~ediately after demagnetization b) as t_.,...co ••••••••••••• • • • • • • •

4• a) Permeability versus time ~or varying temper­atures

b) Temperature dependence of permeability change

vi

Page

3

6

9

within a ~inite t 2 - t 1 time interval • • • • • 12

5. Measuring cylinder and temperature controller system. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

6. Normalized reluctivity difference Ar versus tem­perature 9 for Fe-Mn-C, Fe-V-C and Fe-Cr-0 •••••

Normalized relucti vi ty difference n r versus tem­perature 9 for Fe-~m-N, Fe-Ti-N, Fe-Cr-N and Fe-V-N •••••••••••••••••••••••

16

26

LIST OF TABLES

Table

I. Sample analyses ror substitutional and inter­stitial concentrations.

vii

Page

19

I. INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW

It has been proven many times that sr~ll. percentages

of carbon or nitrogen in iron and iron al.loys have a marked

effect on mechanical. (1) and magnetic (2) properties of the

material. Mechanical. effects are observed by the applica­

tion of a constant stress and subsequent anal.ysis of the

associated strain. It is found that there is an instanta­

neous strain fo1lo1ied by a time-dependent strain termed the

mechanical after-effect. Similarly, the application of a

magnetic field causes an instantaneous change of the induc­

tion fol.lowed by a time-dependent induction change termed

the magnetic after-effect. Snoek {3)(4)(5), in 1941, gave

the first explanation of mechanical and magnetic after­

effects on an atomic basis. He assumed the basis of both

types of after-e£fect to be the non-cubical. surrounding

of the sites on which the interstitials can reside.

In the absence of an external stress, the unit cell

of bee iron as sho\m in fig:. 1 contains three crystallo­

graphica11y and energetical.ly equivalent interstitial

l.

sites (points x, y, and z). In this condition, and if inter­

stitial-interstitial interactions can be neglected, which

is valid for l.ow concentration sol.id solutions of carbon

or nitrogen in iron, then interstitials will be equall.y

Figure 1

Iron bee unit cell with three energetically

and crystallographically equivalent interstitial

octahedral sites.

2

0

X

3

0 IRO"J AT0~"1S

0 INTERSTITIAL ATOt'o~1S

distributed among the octahedral sites. HoHever, upon the

application of: a non-hydrostatic stress, the dimensions o:r

the unit cell will change and destroy cubic symmetry. The

lack o:r cubic symmetry destroys the crystallographic and

energetic equivalence of the interstitial sites so that in

equilibrium, the distribution o:r interstitials is no longer

homogeneous.

Consider an iron single crystal under a constant [10~ dilatory stress. As the ionic radii of carbon and nitrogen

are larger than the radius o:r a sphere inscribed in an octa­

hedral site (6), a strain energy argument would predict that

interstitials would, in equilibrium, pre:rerentially reside

on x-sites. As the constant stress is removed, the mobile

interstitials will equally redistribute themselves among the

x-, y- and z-sites, which will result in an elastic and an

anelastic strain recovery. (Fig. 2) The anelastic strain

is the result o:r the contraction o:r the x-sites no longer

occupied by interstitials and is positive for dilatory

stress and negative for compressive stress. The anelastic

strain reac~es a maximum as the equilibrium distribution of

interstitials among x-, y- and z-sites is reached.

S~ilar to the strains caused by mechanical stress

applications are dimensional changes caused by the applica­

tion of a magnetic field. This change is termed magneto-

striction. In a f:erromagnetic material such as iron or

4

5

Figure 2

Strain versus time ~or an anelastic specimen.

Load is applied at t 1 and removed at t 2•

\ 6

TIME

its alloys, there is a spontaneous magnetization and mag­

netostriction present even without an externally applied

magnetic rield. This spontaneous magnetization and mag­

netostriction is caused by the coupling between unpaired

electrons in the outermost shells or neighboring atoms (7).

The spontaneous magnetostriction gives rise to· a distortion

of the iron lattice such that the interstitial sites lying

on the axes parallel to the spontaneous magnetostriction

become larger than the other interstitial sites. The larger

sites are more accommodating to the interstitial solute

atoms.

7

A ferromagnetic material is composed or small regions

called domains (8), each being spontaneously magnetized to

saturation in a particular direction. The boundary between

adjacent domains is termed a Bloch Wall. The mobility or

the domain wall at low externally applied fields will deter­

mine the initial permeability.

The magnitude of the initial permeability in dilute

Fe-C,N alloys will depend on the time elapsed after the

demagnetization. Immediately after demagnetization, inter­

stitials which may be represented as dipoles are randomly

oriented (fig. Ja) and the initial permeability is high.

With increasing time, the interstitial dipoles will accom­

modate with the direction of the local spontaneous magneti­

zation (fig. Jb). The redistribution of the interstitial

dipoles will stabilize the new Bloch Wall configuration,

8

, ..

Figure 3

Distribution o£ interstitial dipoles

a) immediately a£ter demagnetization

b) as t-. oo.

---1"-

_...,::m.

- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -

- I I I -- I I I - I - I I - ,, I

(b) \_

9

t~

\VALL

I I I I I I I I I I I I

INTERSTITIAL

DIPOLE

10

i.e., the Bloch Wall mobility decreases, and thus the permo­

ability decreases. The time decrease o~ the initial permea­

bility is termed disaccommodation.

The time change in permeability is strongly temperature

dependent (f.'ig. 4a) and a plot of the dif.'ference in permea­

bilities over a finite time versus· temperature will shmi a

definite maximum (~ig. 4b). The same is true for dif.'fer­

ences o~ the reciprocal of permeability (reluctivity) versus

temperature. With reference to fig. 4a, the di~ference

between permeability values at t 1 and t 2 for low tempera­

tures will be very small due to the low thermal activation

for interstitial redistribution. At very high temperatures

the change of.' the initial permeability t-Till. be complete

before the time interval starts. Consequently, the difference

between permeabilities at t 1 and t 2 is again small. At

intermediate temperatures, a large change in permeability

within the t 2-t1 interval. is noticed. Therefore, a plot of

permeability difference versus temperature shows a definite

maximum as shown in 1'ig. 4b.

Now consider an interstitial atom located next to a sub­

stitutional atom placed in the regular iron lattice. There

will be two additional ~actors affecting the mobility and

equilibrium distribution of interstitials. First, an addi­

tional strain component caused by introducing a substitu­

tional element with ionic radius different from that of iron;

Figure 4

a) Permeability versus t~e ror varying temper­atures

11

b) Temperature dependence or permeability change within a rinite t2 - tl time interval.

1-&t')

A

t-v A

.... ., A

t-N

" ~---

rf V

·~.:AI 0 A.LI11SV3~'\l~ 3

d

w ~

::,:) 1

-<

! ~

w

"- -c:; £a

w

1-

N

cC-w

~

c::! -t-.... -

12

......... ..Q

~

,...,, c

._.,_

13

and secbnd, a change ~ the energy barrier around intersti­

tial sites caused by an adjacent substitutional with valence

different from that of iron. A combination of both of the

above can cause a change in the mobility of selected inter­

stitials which will show up as additional peaks in a plot of

reluctivity difference versus temperature.

In this investigation the effect of substitutional

alloying elements on the diffusion of carbon or nitrogen in

alpha-iron were studied. Magnetic disaccommodation tech­

niques were applied to obtain relaxation times. Because

Changes in the electronic configurations of substitutional

elements are thought to have marked effect on the diffu­

sional process {9), substitutional elements were selected so

that the number of electrons in the 3d band were system­

atically varied. Consequently, dilute iron-carbon and iron­

nitrogen alloys containing manganese, chromium, vanadium

and titanium were investigated.

II. EXPERD1ENTAL PROCEDURE

The initial magnetic permeability~ p.i~ \vas determined

by measuring the mutual. inductance of a coil containing the

sample as a core~ using a self-bal.ancing a.c. bridge (10).

The earth's magnetic field was reduced from 475 mOe to less

than 1 mOe by using high permeability iron-nickel alloy

attenuating cylinders and end plates. The measuring cyl.in­

der (fig. 5) was placed in a Dewar flask partially filled

with liquid nitrogen and then back heated to the desired

temperature. The temperature controller and measuring sys­

tem are shm.m in fig. 5. Temperatures lvere held to within

to.o5°C and were measured with a copper-copper constantan

thermocoupJ.e in contact lvi th the sample.

Demagnetization prior to each disaccommodation measure­

~nt assured a random domain wall configuration and inter­

stitial dipole distribution. This was accomplished by

gradually and continuously decreasing a 60 cycle a.c. mag­

netic field to below 1 mOe.

The initial. permeabil.ity was caJ.culated from the meas-

ured induction (11) according to

Figure 5

Measuring cylinder and temperature controller

system..

15

MEASURING

THERMOCOUPLE

CONTROL THERMOCOUPLE

3 ffh43('JJQ?:tSGDS2CGS?l

r-ME ASU RING ~w-.... , -:;,;-;--.t~

COIL

~~ ~ ~ ili\,} > '=£ '-l 4 _,, t t t t ~t ~ ;s 0\;3 (~ ( I 2

I -....

2

TEMPERATURE CONTROLLER -

- -D.C. POWER

- SUPPLY

3 ""

-4

SAMPLE

FURNACE POWER LEADS

1-' 0'

where: R1 = fixed bridge resistance _ 1,000 oh.ms

L = coil length

n == number of coil turns

p.0 ::: permeability o!' a vacuum

F = sample cross-sectional area

R and C = resistance and capacitance required to baJ.ance the bridge with the sample in the coil.

R0 and C0 = background resistance and capacitance.

AJ.loy melts were prepared by inductively melting 99.9%

pure iron and (nominaJ.J.y) 1 atomic per cent 99.9% pure

titanium, vanadium, chromium or manganese in a 99.7% pure

impervious recrystallized aJ.umina crucibJ.e. Melts with

(nominally) 0.5 atomic per cent titanium or vanadium were

later prepared. Before heat treatin&the samples were

swaged, etched for 30 seconds in aqua regia, and rinsed in

acetone. The sampJ.e analyses made by Kawin Co. are given

in TabJ.e I.

In preparation !'or carbon or nitrogen introduction,

srumpJ.es were first decarburized by heat~ to 800°C !'or at

least 10 hours in a stream of wet hydrogen, and then deni­

trided by heating to 800°C for at least 10 hours in vacuum

(< 10-5 torr). SampJ.es were carburized in a closed system

(approximately 1,000 cm3) by heating a mixture of 9% cH4 91% H2 to 800°0 for 10 hours. The carbon content (TabJ.e I)

was estimated !'rom thermodynamic data (12). The samples

17

were supported in a quartz tube and a~ter heat treatment

were quenched in brine. Immediately a~ter quenching the

samples were placed in a ~reezer at -20°C to retard carbide

~ormation.

18

Nitriding was per~ormed at 590°C in a gas mixture o~

dried 5% NH3 - 95% H2 , ~lowing at approximately 300 cc/min.

Percentage o~ nitrogen present (Table I) was estimated rrom

thermodynamic data (13). Arter heat treatment, samples were

brine quenched and placed in a -20°C ~reezer. With partie-

ular re~erence to the Fe-V-N and Fe-Ti-N alloys the precipi­

tation or nitrides was very rapid arter quench. Even with

an elapsed time or less than 3 minutes taken to quench a

sample and transrer it into the measuring coil at -20°C,

nitride ror.mation drastically decreased the value or the

initial permeability. Reducing the NH3 content in the gas

mixture to less than 2~ did not decrease nitride ror.mation.

f1-llo:y:

Fe-e

Fe-Cr-C

Fe-Mn-C

Fe-V-C

Fe-Ti-C

Fe-N

Fe-Cr-N

Fe-Mn-N

Fe-V-N

Fe-Ti-N

TABLE I

Sample analyses for substitutional and interstitial concentrations

Composition

substitutional interstitial

-- 0.0050

0.72 0.0050

0.28 0.0050

0.94 0.0050

0.70 --0.006

0.72 o.oo6

0.28 0.006

0.45 0.006

O.l.6 0.006

19

(12)(13)

20

III. EXPERil1ENTAL RESULTS

With zero time taken as when the demagnitizing ~ield

became smaller than the measuring ~ield, the initial

permeability, p 1 , was measured at 1 and 10 minutes as a

function o~ temperature. The magnitude o~ the disaccommoda­

tion was expressed by the re1uctivity dif~erence 1/)11 (10) -

1/p.i ( 1).

The relaxation data were analyzed by assuming discrete

Debye relaxation times. If the overall relaxation process

can be considered to be made up of several first order

relaxation processes, then

1 - 1 : 2:. a exp(- ~) Jli ( 00 ) )li ( t ) ~ j .... j

(1)

where aj and ~j are respectively the relaxation strength and

relaxation t~e of the jth relaxation. Over the given tem­

perature range aj can be considered constant. For a single

relaxation

-A r- 1 1 ( 2)

and

. -r = 'f" 0 exp( Q/RT). (3)

21

The tempel''ature dependent maximum of' A r occurs with a relax-

ation time

,.. max. <4>

__ .... __ .. _

,..:·~LI , .

which, i'or t 1 = 1 minute and t 2 ::: 10 minutes, equals 243 seconds. From previous work by Wert and Zener (14)(15), the

di1'1'usivity of' carbon in alpha-iron is given by

D = 0.02 exp(-Q/RT) (5)

where

Q = 20,100 cal/mole-°K

The equivalent expression for nitrogen dii'rusion is

D = 0.014 exp(-Q/RT) (6)

where

Q = 17,700 cal/mole-°K

The di1'1'usivity or carbon or nitrogen in alpha-iron is also

given by

where

2 - a

D - 3b-r

a .. lattice constant - 2.86 K ~ - relaxation time.

(7)

Combining equations (5), (6), and (7) alloHs calculation of

the relaxation times of carbon and nitrogen as a runction of

22

temperature. Inserting the calculated values of ~ into

equation (3) gives the temperature dependence of reluctivity

di.fi'erence.

The normalized reluctivity di.f.ference at 1 and 10 min­

utes .for iron-carbon alloys is plotted in .fig. 6 as a .func­

tion o.f temperature. Equation {4) above predicts a maximum _ .?~-----~ '· \

disaccommodation to occur with a relaxation time o:r 243 'l ')t!" /

seconds. Calculation o.f rela~~fon times :ror carbon di:r:ru­

sion {14) (15) indicates the~· second peak to occur at

-19°0, while the experimentally determined maximum occurred

at -22°0. The agreement between the two temperatures is

satis.factory considering the uncertainty in the values o:r Q

and --r 0 •

The normalized reluctivity di.f.ference at 1 and 10 min­

utes .for iron-nitrogen alloys is plotted in .fig. 7 as a

function oi' temperature. The low temperature maximum i'or

nitrogen di.f.fusion was calculated to occur at -34° and

experimentally observed at -30° .for Fe-Ti-N and -31° .for

Fe-Mn-N. Again, the agreement is satis.factory considering

the uncertainty in the values o.f Q and~0 • An additional

disaccommodation peak was .found at higher temperatures in

each Fe- substitutional -N sample. The additional peak .for

Fe-V-N occurred at +10°0 .for Fe-Cr-N at -14°C .for Fe-Mn-N

at -21°0 and .for Fe-Ti-N at +12°C. The resultant curve o.f

Fe-Mn-N was decomposed into the regular Fe-N curve with

maximum at -34°C and the additional disaccommodation curve

23

Figure 6

Norma1ized re1uctivity difference Ar versus tem­

perature 9 for Fe-Mn-C, Fe-V-C and Fe-Cr-C.

1.0 tJ:

FE-C m a c FE-V-C IAAA FE-CR-C

0.8 G00 FE-r .. ~~-c L. <l

I.L 0 LL - O.G c )-t--> 0.4 -t-0 . m :::) ....I LLI 0:: 0.2

• II 0: 0 z a

0.0 -:so -20 -10 0 + 10 +20

TE~~PERATURE a [oc]

Figure 7

Normalized reluctivity difference ~r versus tem­

perature 9 for Fe-Mn-N, Fe-Ti-N, Fe-Cr-N and Fe-V-N.

25

2.4

2.2

2.0

1.8 L-

<J

1&1 1.6

~ :z ~ a:: ~ I.&... I.&... iS :1:::: . :::::... i= ~ ~ 1.0 __. ~ a: I ,- f I

I I

~ I ~ o.e I ...._. I :::::i I

I ~ I

:E I , a: • C> I :z I ,

I 0.4 ~ , , ,. , _,

-, ' ...

' ... , \ \

FE-\.

TO

\

'',, • ... ,

... , '

3-78

I I I I I I

• I I ,

I

' I

' I

I I

FE-V..L.N I

___ .-.IIIIi

, I

I I

I , I

I I I ,

, I I

I , I

I I I I I

I I I

I I

TO

... , • .......

..... ..... '-.. ------------

3.28

• ' • ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • ' ' ' ' •

' \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • ' '

o.ol I I I 1 1 1 - ._ , , 1

0 + 10 + 20 -1-30 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10

TEMPERATURE e [·c]

!

S!.

with max~um at -21°0. Data were normalized to the pouk

value o~ the Fe-N curve at -34°C. The Fe-Cr-N curve was

similarly decomposed into the regular Fe-U curve at -34°C and the additional disaccomrnodation curve with maximum at

-~00, and then normalized to the peak value o~ the Fe-N

curve at -34°C, Fe-Ti-N and Fe-V-N curves were not decom­

posed as the two peaks are su~~iciently apart.

A decrease o~ initial permeability showed nitride

formation in Fe - 1 at. ~ V - N and Fe - 1 at. ~ Ti - N to

be pl .. onounced.

27

28

IV. DISCUSSION

The after-effect of the initial permeability can be

caused by reorientation of defects with symmetry lower than

that of the host lattice, by long range diffusion o£ defects

over distances comparable to Bloch Wall thicknesses and by

thermally activated motion o£ Bloch Walls (11). Considering

the temperatures at lvhich the disacco:mmodations take place,

it is generally concluded that the reorientation mechanism

is operative.

The results of this investigation indicate that (1)

varying the substitutional element in ternary iron-carbon

al.loys does not affect the reorientation of' interstitial car­

bon and (2) varying the substitutional element in iron-nitro­

gen alloys has a non-uniform affect on nitrogen reorientation.

Seeing a definite additional after-effect of initial

permeability in each Fe- substitutional -N alloy raises a

significant question: Was the additional af'ter-ef'fect

caused by the additional strain component or by the elec­

tronic interactions produced by a variation of' the substitu­

tional?

The data presented here provide a qualitative basis for

rationalizing the operative mechanism of the additional af'ter­

ef'.fect. of' initial permeabi1ity. An argument based on addi­

tional favorable strain components and electronic interactions

can be made in explaining results of iron-nitrogen studies.

The additional amplitudes of the disaccommodations are much

J.arger in chromium and vanadium than in titanium or manga-/'1 .,

nese. As_ the i<:>nic radii of chromium and~_are both

29

smaller than that of iron, adding a substitutional chromium

or vanadium increases the effective distance betl-reen lattice

centers. The addition thus decreases the free energy level

of the six neighboring interstitial sites, partiaJ.ly con­

tributing to an additional after-effect of permeability.

Noting that the ionic radii of titanium and manganese are

larger than that of iron while seeing small additional dis­

accommodation amplitudes in these samples, points to the

electronic interactions between interstitial-substitutional

pairs as being the primary contributor to the additional

after-effect of permeability. The oxidation state of nitro-

gen is ±3, while that of vanadium, titanium, manganese and

chromium can be +3. Formation of a N-V, N-Ti, N-Mn or

Ni-Cr pair will thus approach a ground state level and

create an energy barrier surrounding the pair that decreases

the mobiJ.ity of the interstitial. The decreased mobility

of seJ.ected interstitial~ leads to an additional disaccommo­

dation peak. As the +3 oxidation state for chromium is its

most stable state, the J.argest additional disaccommodation

would be expected in Fe-Cr-N samples, as the results verify.

Similar arguments may be made to expJ.ain the·lack of an

additional. after-effect of permeabiJ.ity in Fe- substitutional

-c alloys. The primary cause is believed to be the large

value o£ ionic radius £or carbon. The radius or carbon is

approximately three t~es as large as iron. Thererore,

any change in lattice dimension introduced by a substitu­

tional will not signiricantly alter interstitial mobility.

The oxidation state or carbon is ±4. As no substitutional

investigated has its most stable state as +4, large energy

barriers around c- substitutional pairs will not be devel­

oped in this case. Electronic interactions are thereby not

signi£icant to cause additional disaccommodations.

30

V. CONCLUSIONS

Measurements o~ the initial permeability o~ dilute

iron-base transition metal (manganese, chromium, vanadium,

titanium) alloys containing carbon or nitrogen were made.

Over the temperature range investigated with iron-carbon

alloys, -30°0 to +20°0, no evidence of an additional dis­

accommodation was ~ound. Over the temperature range inves­

tigated ~or di~fusion o~ interstitial nitrogen, -50°0 to

-30°0, a strongly temperature dependent extra disaccommoda­

tion was found.

Data were analyzed in terms of a single Debye relaxa­

tion on the basis o~ Wert•s values of activation energies

for carbon and nitrogen di~~usion in bee alpha-iron.

The extra disaccommodation in Fe- substitutional -N

is attributed primarily to electronic stabilization of

interstitial substitutional pairs, while the absence of an

extra disaccommodation in Fe- substitutional -c alloys is

explained on the basis of strain energy arguments.

31

I

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. ZENER, C. (1948) Elasticity and Ane1asticity o~ Metals. University o~ Chicago Press, Chicago.

2. ADLER, E. and C • RADELOFF, ZS. Angew. Phys. 20, 346 (1966). -

SNOEK, J. L.' Physica §. (1939) 161.

SNOEK, J. L.' Physica §. (1939) 591.

SNOEK, J. L.' Physica § (1941) 711.

6. REED-HILL, R. E. (1964) Physical Metallurgy Principles, 2nd ed., Van Nostrand, New York, p. 222.

32

7. AZAROFF, L. V. and J. J. BROPHY (1963) Electronic Processes in Materials, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 384.

8.

9.

10.

11.

l.2.

13.

14.

15.

WEISS, P. , J. Phys. , §., 661-690.

LEVY, P. M., J. Phys. Chem. Solids ~' 415 (1965).

WUTTIG, M. and H. K. BIRNBAUM, J. Phys. Chem. Solids E:L, 22$-234 ( 1966) •

REIDER, H., z. Metallk • .2!J:, 229 (1963) •

SMITH, R. P., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 68, 1163 (1946).

BOSMAN, A. J., thesis, Amsterdrum Univ. 1960.

WERT, C., Phys. Rev. 12, 601 (1950).

_WERT, C. and C. ZENER, Phys. Rev. J2., 1169 ( 1949) •

33

VITA

The author was born on October 30, 1944, in Independence,

Missouri. He received his primary and secondary education

in .Kansas City, Missouri. He has received his college educa­

tion from Kansas City Junior College, in Kansas City, Mis­

souri; and the University of Missouri - Rolla. He received

a Bachelor of Science Degree in Metallurgical Engineering

from the University of Missouri - Rolla in June, 1966.

He has been enrolled in the Graduate School of the

University of Missouri - Rolla since September, 1966, and has

held a student teaching assistantship for the period Septem­

ber, 1966 to June, 1967, and the Alcoa Metallurgical Fellow­

ship for the period September, 1967 to June, 1968.