Mafileo Tupou

8/11/2019 Mafileo Tupou

1/3

1

Mafileo Tupou

Professor McEnaney

History 207

9/16/14

Primary Source Analysis

1. A man named Carl Schurz created this primary source. Based on the document he

seemed to be a journalist during the reconstruction of the South. Although he talks

about reconstructing the South, to bring it in harmony with the rest of American

society, I believe that Schurz was for the betterment of the South. Carl Schurz was a

strong advocate for free labor, but he argued that the South would not cooperate

with the North if the troops maintained in the South and if the Freedmens Bureau

was not abolished, Hence their anxiety to have their (South) State governments

restored at once, to have the troops withdrawn, and the Freedmens Bureau

abolished it would be far better for them to have the general order of society

firmly maintained by the federal power until things have arrived at a final

settlement.Schurz claimed an important step to reconstruction in the South was to

restore the damaged society due to the aftermath of the Civil War.

2. This document is telling me how chaotic it was in the immediate post-Civil War era.

After the Civil War, government was having a hard time just deciding how much

control they should have upon the defeated South. Schurz believed that less

government control in the South would make the process of reconstruction a lot

faster and more effective. The concept of power seemed to be a main focal point in

that time and age. Questions such as: how much power should the federal


2/3

2

government have on the state governments and how much control should the

federal government have on free labor lingered among the government officials, the

Southern farmers, and the slaves as well. African Americans after the war celebrated

their freedom and expected a lot more than just the abolition of slavery. Although

blacks in America were legally free and considered citizens of America, the constant

debate of free labor demonstrates that they were still considered property. The only

difference was that they had rights.

3. A big concept that comes to mind after reading Schurzs report is the definition of

freedom. Even though the source is about the reconstruction of the South and the

application of free labor and not necessarily freedom, everyones opinion on how

the country should go about reconstruction is based on that very idea. In Foner, the

author claims that many of the problems during the reconstruction period were

because of the different definitions of freedom, Although the freed people failed

to achieve full freedom as the understood it, their ongoing struggles to define the

meaning of freedom did much to shape the nations political and social agenda

during Reconstruction (81). Many white southerners believed that slaves were

unpreparedfor freedom, which stated that African Americans were still not

human. Vice versa, emancipated slaves thought they were well due of freedom and

the rights that came with it. Carl Schurzs demand for freelabor without the control

of the federal government brought the question of whether the South would just

return to its old ways (slavery). The abolition of slave just made freedom a national

policy, and not a born given right, The legal abolition of slavery posed the


3/3

3

definition of freedom as a concrete matter of national policy, rather than simply a

philosophical problem or matter of political theory (Foner 82).This idea clearly

displays why the South continues to fight for free labor in order to amend the

physical, political, and economical damage from the Civil War.

4. Schurzs documentmakes me realize how difficult and complicated the

Reconstruction of American was. In that period there were so many different ways

to go about rebuilding the country. Schurz, heavily South influenced, said that free

labor with less control from the federal government was the best process of

reconstruction the South. But was it necessary for him to rid of the Freedmans

Bureau? A group which protects the well-being of freed slaves? I see a lot of racist

connotation in his theories and I believe if the country were to go about in his

direction, then the Civil War would have been fought for nothing. The mere fact that

he did not even think about what sex-slaves thought about free labor shows me his

lack of interest of their well-being.

Documents

Mafileo Tupou