Macroinvertebrate Counts; Now and Then Comparing and contrasting 2000’s macroinvertebrate count, to 2008’s macroinvertebrate count

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1

Macroinvertebrate Counts; Now and Then Comparing and contrasting 2000s macroinvertebrate count, to 2008s macroinvertebrate count. Slide 2 Macroinvertebrates Group1- Sensitive organisms, Includes pollution- sensitive organisms such as mayfly, stonefly, and caddisfly larva, which are typically found in good quality water. Group 2- Somewhat sensitive organisms includes somewhat pollution- tolerant organisms such as, crayfish, sowbugs and clams, found in fair- quality water. Group 3- Tolerant organisms includes pollution- tolerant organisms such as, worms, leeches, and midges, found in poor-quality water. Slide 3 How we did it! First we would take our plastic container with sediments Then we would search the sediments carefully for any kind of movement We would make sure not to harm the organisms in anyway Once we found something we would determine what kind of macroinvertebrate it was by looking at the pictures on the ice container which was used to isolate the macros in their rightful place. Lastly all the groups would combine their macroinvertebrate counts to form one biosurvey This is how we separated and determined what group and what macroinvertebrate it was. Slide 4 How does 2000s Macro Count Compare to 2008s Depends on how much pollution the stream or creek has experienced over the years. How much the past and present students have found out about are streams. For example, if the past students worked harder to find out the streams problems they would have probably been more successful to make the stream better. Slide 5 Patcongs Macroinvertebrate Counts (1) Group I20002008 Stonefly Nymphs00 Caddisfly Larva162 Water Penny Larva 00 Riffle Beetle00 Mayfly Nymphs02 Gilled Snail20 Dobsonfly Larva60 Index Value- 6#s greater than 0 x 3= 9 #s greater than 0 x 3=6 Slide 6 Patcongs Macroinvertebrate Counts (2) Group II20002008 Crayfish 1 0 Sowbugs 10 0 Scuds 23 11 Alderfly Larva 11 0 Fishfly Larva 8 3 Damselfly Nymphs 23 8 Watersnipe Fly Larva 0 1 Crane Fly Larva 2 0 Beetle Larva 8 8 Dragonfly Larva 2 4 Clams 11 2 Index Value- 14 #s greater than 0 x 2= 20 #s greater than 0 x 2 =14 Slide 7 Patcongs Macroinvertebrate Counts (3) Group III20002008 Aquatic Worms610 Midge Fly Larva50 Blackfly Larva31 Leeches00 Pouch/Pond Snails00 Other Snails00 Index Value-2 Total Index Value- 22 #s greater than 0 x 1 = 3 All Index Values added together= 32 #s greater than 0 x 1 = 2 All Index Values added together to get 22. Slide 8 Is the Water Quality For Patcong Creek Acceptable in 2008 & 2000? Poor, Fair, Good, or Excellent Excellent= (> 22) Good= (17-22) Fair= (11-16) Poor= ( Is the Water Quality for Miry Run Acceptable in 2008? Poor, Fair, Good, or Excellent Excellent= (> 22) Good= (17-22) Fair= (11-16) Poor= (