Macro Research

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    1/14

    Macroeconomic Determinant of Banks Lending Rate in the Philippines

    In Partial Fulfillment in the Subject

    Macroeconomics

    Bachelor of Science and Agricultural Economics

    Submitted by:

    Joriz Klenz Sabete,

    Ma. Belinda De Chavez

    Mary Joy Palaa

    Submitted to:

    Prof. Silverio V. Magallon Jr.

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    2/14

    Macroeconomic Determinants ofBanks Lending Rate in the Philippines

    By: Joriz Klenz Sabete, Ma. Belinda De Chavez and Mary Joy Palaa

    I- IntroductionPrime rate is the term applied in many countries to reference interest rate used

    by banks. It is the rate that commercial banks charge to its most creditworthy

    customers (Wikipedia). The fund was a formed as an investment medium to participate

    in bank loans from lending banks. These funds were a vehicle for banks to expand

    their equity or reduce their outstanding loans (Peter De Lio).

    The prime rate is the one of the most watch variables in the economy of any

    particular country. It is an important index used by banks to set rates on many

    consumer loan products, such as real estate, mortgage, credit cards, auto loans and

    others. Hence, prime rate gone, credit card rate will soon follow.

    The fluctuations of prime rate or banks lending rate are influenced by varieties

    of economic factors such as direct and indirect factor and it is a simple matter of

    Federal Reserve decisions. Its fluctuations are reflecting in the supply of funds,

    available for loans from lenders, and the demand, from barrowers. If the demand for

    borrowing is higher than the funds they have available, they can raise their rates or

    borrow money from other people by issuing bonds to institutions in the wholesale

    market. The trouble is the source of funds is more expensive. Therefore interest rates

    go up. If the banks and trust companies have lots of money to lend the consumer will

    get special rate discounts and the lenders will be very competitive, keeping rates low 1.

    The Philippine lending rates fluctuations result to swift decision concerning the

    status of a country. Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) lending rate increased seasonally

    to 3.2 percent from 2.8 percent as inflation continued to decline while prime rate was

    1The Financial Pipeline (http://www.finpipe.com/interest.htm).

    http://www.finpipe.com/interest.htmhttp://www.finpipe.com/interest.htmhttp://www.finpipe.com/interest.htmhttp://www.finpipe.com/interest.htm
  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    3/14

    on the rise (Chipongian, 2010)2. But eased by 2011 to 2 percent in the third quarter

    from 2.5 percent in the second quarter due to reduction in the average nominal bank

    lending rate while inflation remained steady (Agcaoili, 2011)3. As well as,

    unemployment and rising and falling of prices attributes to the swift decision related

    to economic difficulties which contributes to the fluctuation of banks lending rates.

    Consequently, this case must be pursued by an immense study too satisfy the

    concerns of the economy and the people lying on it.

    Objective

    The focal point in this study is to determine the effects money supply, to the

    occurring fluctuation of banks lending rate. Specifically, this aims to:

    To present the trend across time of the variables used, which are:o Banks Lending Rateso Money Supply

    Determine the correlation of money supply to interest rate.Scope and Limitation

    The study focuses on the effects of the given indicator money supply to banks

    lending rate as the predicted variable. The data drawn in this study was a time series

    data from 1980-2010 taken from the Philippine statistics. The researcher uses

    Ordinary Least Square (OLS) to minimize the sum of Residual Square with correlation

    approach. Through this, the behavior of the interest rate in response to the changes

    occur by the given variable will be realized.

    2Manila Bulletin Publishing Corporation (http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-

    rate-rising-trend).3 Philstar (http://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivership).

    http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trend
  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    4/14

    II- Literature Review and Analytical Framework

    Theory Base

    Base in the Keynesian Theory of liquidity preference framework developed by

    John Maynard Keynes determines that the equilibrium or change in the interest rates

    depends on the supply and demand for money.

    The liquidity preference framework suggests that money supply has a negative

    relationship to interest rate. As money supply increases, interest rate decreases with

    the same level of money demanded. This aims to increase the aggregate output

    (Lombra, 2000). In lowering interest rate more investors will encourage to invest, so

    the demand for labor increases. In increase in investment aggregate expenditure

    increases and in increase in aggregate expenditure, aggregate output will rise, under

    the concept of Aggregate Demand in the Goods and Money Market (Case et al., 2000).

    In a basic supply and demand application, given a constant demand for money,

    increasing the money supply will invariably lower interest rates because of the

    availability of money, more money around means its easy to get and will thus

    (borrowers can) command lower interest rates.

    Related Studies

    There were established studies related in interest rate or banks lending rate.

    This could be utilized as references or bases to satisfy the given theory and to expand

    the study.

    Interest rates movement is given a lot of attention by public because it serves

    as a stimulant of when was the right time to go on banks. Fluctuation in the banks

    lending rate could positively or negatively affect a particular economy as well as

    individuals wealth and debt. It is influence by personal decisions or whether to

    consume or to save. Moreover, the prime rate also affects the decision of business

    (Angie Arias, pdf, 2005).

    Base on the study of Felicia Omowunmi Olokoyo in 1 percent increase of money

    supply correspond 0.4 percent reduction to bank lending rate. She found out that due

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    5/14

    to macroeconomic instability changes in money supply has a negative long-run impact

    on the lending bank rate in Nigeria. Specifically, banks tend to reduce lending during

    periods of high liquidity basically because of possible low return on lending (and

    possibly low loan demand) and perhaps have to channel their funds towards

    alternative sources of income earning activities and investments.

    Furthermore, in the study of Madjed Bader et al. (2010), they found out that

    increasing money supply reduces banks lending rate or interest rate and allows

    investment to increase. As well as Raj Chetty (2007) found out that in increase in

    interest rate causes a reduction on interest rate. Moreover, base on the study of James

    E. Gunderson et al. (2007), in rise in interest rate reduces investment that results to

    low economic activity then demand for labor in the goods market decreases.

    Hence, the related studies on this research support the conceptualization on

    this research.

    Analytical Framework

    This pertains on how money supply affects banks lending ratesfluctuation.

    Figure 1. The Conceptual Framework of the Study

    Null hypothesis:

    Ho1: : Money Supply has no significant relationship to interest rate.

    INTEREST

    RATE

    Money Supply

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    6/14

    III- MethodologyThis study uses correlation analysis to determine the impact of money supply to

    interest rate.

    Research Design

    This research is a causal study which uses time series data analysis of the year

    1980-2010. Which tend to explain the effects of investment, price, money supply, and

    unemployment rate to banks lending rate and the response of it.

    Variable Measurement

    Variable Unit Definition

    Interest Rate -Percentage -It is also called bankslending rate.

    -The interest rate charged by

    banks on loans to prime

    customers.

    Money Supply -Percentage -Money and quasi money

    comprise the sum of currency

    outside banks, demand

    deposits other than those of

    the central government, and

    the time, savings, and foreign

    currency deposits of residentsectors other than the central

    government. This definition of

    money supply is frequently

    called M2.

    -it is the percentage annual

    growth of money supply.

    Source of Data

    The data was taken from World Bank4 from year 1981-2010 which are interest rate

    and money supply.

    4 http://data.worldbank.org/country/philippines

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    7/14

    IV- Result and DiscussionIn this part shows the result and the discussion of the given objectives.

    I. Trend Presentation of Macroeconomic VariableIn this section the trend of the different macroeconomic variables are being

    presented and interpreted.

    Banks Lending Rate

    It can be seen from the graph that the trend of banks lending rate is decreasing

    from 1980 to 2010. This due increasing investment and money supply. Moreover, it

    has the highest lending rate during 1985 with 28.61% and the lowest lending rate

    during 2009 with 8.57% because Philippines has decided to cut its interest rate by 25basis points ensure liquidity and boost market confidence amid the global economic

    crisis, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas affirmed5.

    Source: World Bank, 2012

    Figure I- Trend for Banks Lending Rate

    5Updated March 05, 2009, 05:30 PM.

    Philstar.com.http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleid=445785

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

    InterestR

    ate

    Year

    http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleid=445785http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleid=445785http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleid=445785http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleid=445785
  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    8/14

    Trend in Money Supply

    Money is used in virtually all economic transactions; it has a powerful effect on

    economic activity. In figure 1, it shows the fluctuating trend of money supply in the

    Philippines. Philippines experience the maximum of percentage increase money during

    1998 with 59.53% and minimum 21.97% in 1980. The cause for an increase of money

    supply works both through lowering interest rate which spurs or stimulate

    investment, and through putting more money in hands of consumers and vice versa.

    During 1980, the economy began to run into difficultly because of the declining

    world market for the Philippines exports. It is the under of Pres. Marcos regime and

    revive during 1986 in the time of Pres. Corazon Aquino. But in 1988 the economy

    again began to encounter difficulties. The trade deficit and the government budget

    deficit were a particular concern. But increase the supply of money until 1990 until it

    reaches to the peak in the year 1998. Due to rapid developing of subsector that

    increases the GNP through the introduced new technologies6.

    After the peak on 1998 it comes down to recession to 2006 and rise again until

    2010.

    Source: World Bank, 2012

    Figure II- Trend of Money Supply

    6Taken fromhttp://www.economy.com/home/products/databases.asp.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

    MoneySupply

    Year

    http://www.economy.com/home/products/databases.asphttp://www.economy.com/home/products/databases.asphttp://www.economy.com/home/products/databases.asphttp://www.economy.com/home/products/databases.asp
  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    9/14

    II. Correlation of Money Supply to Banks Lending RateBase on the correlation matrix, it shows that money supply has a negative

    relationship to interest rate. Thus, 66% can be explained of money supply to interest

    rate with the .000 significance level. Hence, there are highly correlated.

    Paired Correlation

    Correlation Significance

    INTEREST and MONEYSUPPLY

    -.665 .000

    V. ConclusionBase on the analysis in the correlation the null hypothesis is being rejected. It

    implies that money supply and interest rate has a negative relationship. Money supply

    could explain 66% to interest rate. Thus there are highly correlated.

    As a final point, as money supply increases, interest rate decreases. This

    encourages investors to invest that aims to increase aggregate output and the right

    time to lend in banks.

    I. Policy RecommendationTo redress the prevailing situation, this study drawn to these recommendations:

    Strict implementation of tight monetary fiscal policy to increase moneysupply that aims to decrease interest rate.

    Decrease interest rate to encourage investments that to increase theaggregate output in the economy.

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    10/14

    Appendix I

    Paired Correlation

    N Correlation Significance

    Pair 1 INTERESTandMONEYSUPPLY

    31 -.665 .000

    Descriptive Statistics

    N Minimum Maximum MeanStd.

    Deviation Variance

    INTEREST 31 8.57 28.61 15.0643 5.54725 30.772

    MONEYS 31 21.97 59.53 42.0289 13.60293 185.040

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    11/14

    Appendix II

    Data in the Model

    Obs. Interest Rate Money Supply

    1980 14.00 21.97

    1981 15.34 22.61

    1982 18.12 23.68

    1983 19.24 27.92

    1984 28.20 25.90

    1985 28.61 27.31

    1986 17.53 27.38

    1987 13.34 26.06

    1988 15.92 26.23

    1989 19.27 28.79

    1990 24.12 31.11

    1991 23.07 32.18

    1992 19.48 34.24

    1993 14.68 38.00

    1994 15.06 42.15

    1995 14.68 46.85

    1996 14.84 50.90

    1997 16.28 56.21

    1998 16.78 58.90

    1999 11.78 59.53

    2000 10.91 59.25

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    12/14

    2001 12.40 57.89

    2002 9.14 56.77

    2003 9.47 55.70

    2004 10.08 52.71

    2005 10.18 50.99

    2006 9.78 52.10

    2007 8.69 52.87

    2008 8.75 51.99

    2009 8.57 52.32

    2010 8.70 52.39

    Note: Highlighted figures are forecasted data.

  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    13/14

    References

    Theories and Related Studies:

    Angie Arias, 2005. Prime Rate in the United States (1980-2003). March 02,

    2012. (http://faculty.msmary.edu/stanton/EconMajor/metricsF05/list.htm ).

    Bureau of Market Research; pdf, 2011. Personal Income Estimates for South Africa,

    2011. March 03, 2012.

    (http://www.unisa.ac.za/contents/faculties/ems/docs/BMR_info_blurp_407.pdf)

    Charles Kahn, George Pennacchi and Ben Sopranzetti; pdf, 2000. Bank Consolidation

    and Consumer Loan Interest Rates. March 05, 2012.

    (http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/01/0114.pdf)

    Haavelmo, T. (1960) A Study in the Theory of Investment(Chicago: Chicago

    University Press). March 21, 2012.

    (http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdf)

    Haider Ali; pdf, (2011). Effect of the Unemployment Report on Interest Rate Future.

    March 22, 2012.

    (http://quantitativebrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nonfarm-4.pdf)

    Independent Management Consulting Services Ltd; pdf, 2003. Review of Factors

    Affecting Levels of Interest Rates in Zambia. March 19, 2012.

    (http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNACX610.pdf)

    James E. Gunderson and Frederic P. Sterbenz; pdf, 2007. The Impact on Interest

    Rates of Weekly Unemployment Announcement and their Revisions. March 22,

    2012.(http://69.175.2.130/~finman/Orlando/Papers/gundersonsterbenz_011507.pdf)

    Lawrence Agcaoili; PhilSTAR, November 06, 2011. Banks Real Lending Rate Ease to

    2%. March 05, 2012.

    (http://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-

    receivership)

    Lee C. Chipongian; Manilla Bulletin Publishing Corporation, July21, 2010. Banks

    Real Lending Rate on Rising Trend. March 05, 2012.

    (http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trend )

    Majed Bader and Ahmad and Ahmad Ibrahim Malawi; pdf, 2010. The Impact of

    Interest Rate on investment in Jordan: A Cointegration Analysis. March 22,

    2012. (http://www.eis.hu.edu.jo/Deanshipfiles/pub100592114.pdf)

    http://faculty.msmary.edu/stanton/EconMajor/metricsF05/list.htmhttp://faculty.msmary.edu/stanton/EconMajor/metricsF05/list.htmhttp://faculty.msmary.edu/stanton/EconMajor/metricsF05/list.htmhttp://www.unisa.ac.za/contents/faculties/ems/docs/BMR_info_blurp_407.pdfhttp://www.unisa.ac.za/contents/faculties/ems/docs/BMR_info_blurp_407.pdfhttp://www.unisa.ac.za/contents/faculties/ems/docs/BMR_info_blurp_407.pdfhttp://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/01/0114.pdfhttp://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/01/0114.pdfhttp://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/01/0114.pdfhttp://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdfhttp://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdfhttp://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdfhttp://quantitativebrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nonfarm-4.pdfhttp://quantitativebrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nonfarm-4.pdfhttp://quantitativebrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nonfarm-4.pdfhttp://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNACX610.pdfhttp://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNACX610.pdfhttp://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNACX610.pdfhttp://69.175.2.130/~finman/Orlando/Papers/gundersonsterbenz_011507.pdfhttp://69.175.2.130/~finman/Orlando/Papers/gundersonsterbenz_011507.pdfhttp://69.175.2.130/~finman/Orlando/Papers/gundersonsterbenz_011507.pdfhttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://www.eis.hu.edu.jo/Deanshipfiles/pub100592114.pdfhttp://www.eis.hu.edu.jo/Deanshipfiles/pub100592114.pdfhttp://www.eis.hu.edu.jo/Deanshipfiles/pub100592114.pdfhttp://www.eis.hu.edu.jo/Deanshipfiles/pub100592114.pdfhttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/268064/banks-real-lending-rate-rising-trendhttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://beta2.philstar.com/business/744951/101258/prime-bank-now-under-receivershiphttp://69.175.2.130/~finman/Orlando/Papers/gundersonsterbenz_011507.pdfhttp://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNACX610.pdfhttp://quantitativebrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nonfarm-4.pdfhttp://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdfhttp://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/01/0114.pdfhttp://www.unisa.ac.za/contents/faculties/ems/docs/BMR_info_blurp_407.pdfhttp://faculty.msmary.edu/stanton/EconMajor/metricsF05/list.htm
  • 8/2/2019 Macro Research

    14/14

    Micheal J. Dueker; pdf, 2000. Aggregate Price Shocks and financial Instability: An

    Historical Analysis. March 02, 2012. (http://www.nber.org/papers/w7652.pdf)

    Raj Chetty; pdf, 2007. Interest Rates, Irreversibility, and Backward-Bending

    Investment. March 22, 2012.

    (http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdf)

    Raymond E. Lombra and H. Kaufman; JSTOR, 2000. Interest Rate Seasonality and

    the Specification of Money Demand Function. Review of Economics and

    Statistics (May 1975), pp. 252-255

    http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1924014?uid=3738824&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=

    4&sid=55943552763

    Why Interest Rate Change. March 06, 2012. (http://www.finpipe.com/interest.htm)

    Yap Voon-Choong; pdf, 2000. Factors Affecting Banks Risk Exposure: Evidence from

    Malaysia. March 19,2012. (http://www.eurojournals.com/ejefas_19_09.pdf)

    Data

    (http://data.worldbank.org/country/philippines )

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w7652.pdfhttp://www.nber.org/papers/w7652.pdfhttp://www.nber.org/papers/w7652.pdfhttp://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdfhttp://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdfhttp://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1924014?uid=3738824&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=55943552763http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1924014?uid=3738824&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=55943552763http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1924014?uid=3738824&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=55943552763http://www.finpipe.com/interest.htmhttp://www.finpipe.com/interest.htmhttp://www.finpipe.com/interest.htmhttp://www.eurojournals.com/ejefas_19_09.pdfhttp://www.eurojournals.com/ejefas_19_09.pdfhttp://www.eurojournals.com/ejefas_19_09.pdfhttp://data.worldbank.org/country/philippineshttp://data.worldbank.org/country/philippineshttp://data.worldbank.org/country/philippineshttp://data.worldbank.org/country/philippineshttp://www.eurojournals.com/ejefas_19_09.pdfhttp://www.finpipe.com/interest.htmhttp://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1924014?uid=3738824&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=55943552763http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1924014?uid=3738824&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=55943552763http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/chetty/files/investment_restud.pdfhttp://www.nber.org/papers/w7652.pdf