64
FINAL AGENDA DATE/TIME: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 9:00 a.m. COMMITTEE: Infrastructure / Economic Development COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS: Carabelli and Mijac COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Committee of the Whole LOCATION: Room 126, Oakland University/Anton Frankel Center, 20 S. Main Street Mount Clemens, MI 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Adoption of Agenda as amended to include Items 9n and 9o 4. Approval of Minutes dated June 15, 2016 (on website) 5. Public Participation (5 minutes maximum per speaker, or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson, related only to issues on the agenda) 6. Central Campus Renovations Update; Jeff Atkins, Plante Moran Cresa (page 1) 7. Budget Amendment – Urban & Community Forestry Grant Program/ (page 12) Department of Planning and Economic Development 8. Annual update on Sanilac/St. Clair Conservation District and Macomb Conservation District; (page 25) Joe Kautz, Administrator for Sanilac/St. Clair Conservation District 9. Receive and File a. 06-10-16 Correspondence from Enbridge RE: Support of Line 5 (page 27) b. SEMCOG and MAC “Pulse of the Region” Survey on Parks and Recreation (page 29) c. 2016 Pavement Preservation Map (page 47) d. Department of Roads Project Info Sheet: Schoenherr Road/14-15 Mile (page 48) e. Department of Roads Project Info Sheet: W.P. Rosso Hwy/Jefferson Ave Intersection (page 49) f. Department of Roads Project Info Sheet: Mound Road/Rinke to south of I-696 (page 50) Macomb County Board of Commissioners Dave Flynn – Board Chair Kathy Tocco – Vice Chair Steve Marino – Sergeant-At-Arms District 1 – Andrey Duzyj District 2 – Marv Sauger District 3 – Veronica Klinefelt District 5 – Rob Mijac District 6 – Jim Carabelli District 7 – Don Brown District 8 – Kathy Vosburg District 9 – Fred Miller District 12 – Bob Smith District 13 – Joe Sabatini

Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

FINAL AGENDA DATETIME Tuesday July 19 2016 900 am COMMITTEE Infrastructure Economic Development COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS Carabelli and Mijac COMMITTEE MEMBERS Committee of the Whole LOCATION Room 126 Oakland UniversityAnton Frankel Center 20 S Main Street Mount Clemens MI

1 Call to Order 2 Pledge of Allegiance 3 Adoption of Agenda as amended to include Items 9n and 9o

4 Approval of Minutes dated June 15 2016 (on website)

5 Public Participation

(5 minutes maximum per speaker or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson related only to issues on the agenda)

6 Central Campus Renovations Update Jeff Atkins Plante Moran Cresa (page 1)

7 Budget Amendment ndash Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program (page 12) Department of Planning and Economic Development

8 Annual update on SanilacSt Clair Conservation District and Macomb Conservation District (page 25) Joe Kautz Administrator for SanilacSt Clair Conservation District

9 Receive and File a 06-10-16 Correspondence from Enbridge RE Support of Line 5 (page 27) b SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation (page 29) c 2016 Pavement Preservation Map (page 47) d Department of Roads Project Info Sheet Schoenherr Road14-15 Mile (page 48) e Department of Roads Project Info Sheet WP Rosso HwyJefferson Ave Intersection (page 49) f Department of Roads Project Info Sheet Mound RoadRinke to south of I-696 (page 50)

Macomb County Board of Commissioners Dave Flynn ndash Board Chair Kathy Tocco ndash Vice Chair Steve Marino ndash Sergeant-At-Arms

District 1 ndash Andrey Duzyj District 2 ndash Marv Sauger District 3 ndash Veronica Klinefelt District 5 ndash Rob Mijac District 6 ndash Jim Carabelli District 7 ndash Don Brown District 8 ndash Kathy Vosburg District 9 ndash Fred Miller District 12 ndash Bob Smith District 13 ndash Joe Sabatini

FINAL AGENDA INFRASTRUCTUREECONIMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ndash July 19 2016 Page 2 of 2

g Department of Roads Project Info Sheet 14 Mile RoadM-53 to 2500 East of M53 (page 51) h Department of Roads Project Info Sheet 14 MileRyan to Mound (page 52) i Department of Roads Project Information Sheet 19 MileHayes to Romeo Plank (page 53) j Department of Roads 07-08-16 Bid Tabulation Quinn Road over Clinton Harrison Drain (page 54) k Department of Roads 07-08-16 Bid Tabulation Lakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair(page 55) l Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Verification (page 56)

Verelien Orchards Inc m Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58)

Verification Verelien Orchards Inc n Detroit Free Press Article Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill risk (page 60) o PACE Update First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project (page 62)

10 New Business

11 Public Participation

(5 minutes maximum per speaker or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson)

12 Adjournment

NOTE AFTER THE MEETING THERE WILL BE A CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS TOUR OF THE OLD COUNTY BUILDING (Facilitated by Plante Moran Cresa and Clark Construction)

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 1

Macomb County Renovations

Monthly Progress Report July 2016

14784

Trade Hours worked in June 2016 1 recordable safety incident

(Cut on hand working without glove Did not follow 100 glove policy)

127544

Trade Hours worked to date on the project since May 2015

SAFETY

Parking Structure

Trade Hours to date 3815 Man Days = 30520 Man hours

Old County Building

Trade hours to date 11012 Man Days = 88096 Man hours

Administration Building

Trade hours to date 1116 Man Days = 8928 Man hours

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Title Macomb County Central Campus Renovations

Program Manager Plante Moran Cresa

Construction Manager Clark Construction

Architect (Project 1) Wakely Associates

Architect (Project 2) Partners in Architecture

Technology Designer Metro Tech

1

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 2

Program Budget

CLOCKWORKSCHEDULE ndash SEE ATTACHED FOR MASTER SCHEDULE

Parking Structure

Firemanrsquos stair installed

Traffic coating placed

Ornamental Fencing installed

Glass doors installed

Roofing complete

Terrazzo flooring Complete

Carpet and rubber stair being installed

Landscape being installed

Old County Building

Lights are installed on all floors

Inspections complete on floors 13-3

Elevator Lobby tile complete on floors 12-5

Carpet installed on floors 12-2

Ceiling tile installed floors 13-2

Drywall on 1st floor for vaulted ceiling started

MEP Testing and Balancing

Inspections on floors 2 amp 1 to be complete

Carpet to be installed on floors 1 amp 2

Elevator Lobby Tile on Floors 1-4 amp 13

Stairwell remediation work to start

Elevator Modernization work on going

Elevator Jambs to start

Gas switch over

2

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 3

Administration Building

5th and 6th drywall installed

5th 6th and 9th floor glass walls field measured

New wood stair being built

9th floor framing completed

9th floor drywall

9th floor electrical being installed

Old boilers were demoed and new boilers were in place and being hooked up

3

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 4

CONNECT

ConnectTM is a web-based platform where all project data and documents are stored shared and accessible online with 24 hour access by Macomb County This allows Macomb County to track the progress of the project in real-time ensures that all parties are working off of the current documents (reducing the risk of errors) and minimizes communication costs and delays

Parking Structure

Request for Information One Hundred Thirty-Two (132) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with one (1) RFI remaining open

Submittals One Hundred Thirty-Four (134) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Old County Building

Request for Information Three Hundred Twenty-Six (326) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with ten (10) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Two Hundred Seventy-Four (274) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Administration Building

Request for Information Seventy-Eight (78) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with twelve (12) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Fifty-three (53) submittal packages are currently in the system with four (4) submittal packages remaining open

CRITIQUE

CritiqueTM is an experience-based tool that enables our project team to drastically reduce if not eliminate errors omissions and risky elements of design before a project starts It is deliverable based on years of systematic tracking from lessons learned on similar projects Benefits include reduction in owner change orders efficient and smooth construction process as issues are caught in the planning phase and reduction in warranty issues

Parking Structure

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Eighteen (18) Bulletins (Proposal Requests) Old County Building

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Twenty-One (21) Bulletins Administration Building

There have been two (2) Addendums issued and Twelve (12) Bulletins

4

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 5

CLARITY

ClarityTM is a Building Information Modeling (BIM) review process that enables Clark Construction Company to ensure before construction starts that MEP trade contractors will install their systems without interfering with each other This results in a reduced number of Owner change orders minimizes schedule delays as clashes are detected prior to mobilizing to complete the work and overall smoother construction flow

BIM coordination sign-off is complete for the Old County Building The final BIM model will be included in the closeout documents for the project It was agreed to do drawing coordination in lieu of BIM on Administration Circuit Court Talmer and Clemens Buildings as a Valued Engineering item This provided savings in cost and schedule This was accepted on all building where construction was performed per floor in occupied buildings After demolition is complete a full scan of the floor is required to initiate the BIM process adding a two week delay to the schedule There are numerous clash detection meetings required to complete the BIM process It was determined valuable to use at the Old County Building only

Technology

5

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 6

TECHNOLOGY

Parking Structure

Fiber optic connection to new IT Closet has been completed

Surveillance System infrastructure and Access Control System installation is nearly complete

Old County Building

Low Voltage Cabling is nearly complete

Low Voltage Cabling is currently in progress of being terminated on the IT Closet side

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Courtroom AV installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation has started

DocketCall (digital courtroom docket display) installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Emergency Notification System will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Administration Building

Low Voltage Cabling installation is in progress on Floors 5 6 and 9

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation to begin on Floors 5 6 and 9

BOC Auditorium AV design is nearly complete and will be reviewed with BOC Administration Once approved installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

CLOSER

CloserTM is a structured process agreed upon early between Macomb County Clark Construction Company Partners in Architecture and Wakely Associates and all Subcontractors on closing out the project within thirty (30) days of Substantial Completion The result is prompt turnover and use of your new facility

Parking Structure

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Punch List has been issued for the parking structure and scheduled to be performed on 71516 for the Welcome Center

Old County Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Incomplete work lists are currently being worked on for all floors

Punch List for Floors 12 issued to contractors Punch List on 11 thru 5 to be performed this month

Administration Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters to the contractors will be issued 6 weeks prior to completion of each floor

6

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 2: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

FINAL AGENDA INFRASTRUCTUREECONIMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ndash July 19 2016 Page 2 of 2

g Department of Roads Project Info Sheet 14 Mile RoadM-53 to 2500 East of M53 (page 51) h Department of Roads Project Info Sheet 14 MileRyan to Mound (page 52) i Department of Roads Project Information Sheet 19 MileHayes to Romeo Plank (page 53) j Department of Roads 07-08-16 Bid Tabulation Quinn Road over Clinton Harrison Drain (page 54) k Department of Roads 07-08-16 Bid Tabulation Lakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair(page 55) l Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Verification (page 56)

Verelien Orchards Inc m Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58)

Verification Verelien Orchards Inc n Detroit Free Press Article Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill risk (page 60) o PACE Update First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project (page 62)

10 New Business

11 Public Participation

(5 minutes maximum per speaker or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson)

12 Adjournment

NOTE AFTER THE MEETING THERE WILL BE A CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS TOUR OF THE OLD COUNTY BUILDING (Facilitated by Plante Moran Cresa and Clark Construction)

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 1

Macomb County Renovations

Monthly Progress Report July 2016

14784

Trade Hours worked in June 2016 1 recordable safety incident

(Cut on hand working without glove Did not follow 100 glove policy)

127544

Trade Hours worked to date on the project since May 2015

SAFETY

Parking Structure

Trade Hours to date 3815 Man Days = 30520 Man hours

Old County Building

Trade hours to date 11012 Man Days = 88096 Man hours

Administration Building

Trade hours to date 1116 Man Days = 8928 Man hours

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Title Macomb County Central Campus Renovations

Program Manager Plante Moran Cresa

Construction Manager Clark Construction

Architect (Project 1) Wakely Associates

Architect (Project 2) Partners in Architecture

Technology Designer Metro Tech

1

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 2

Program Budget

CLOCKWORKSCHEDULE ndash SEE ATTACHED FOR MASTER SCHEDULE

Parking Structure

Firemanrsquos stair installed

Traffic coating placed

Ornamental Fencing installed

Glass doors installed

Roofing complete

Terrazzo flooring Complete

Carpet and rubber stair being installed

Landscape being installed

Old County Building

Lights are installed on all floors

Inspections complete on floors 13-3

Elevator Lobby tile complete on floors 12-5

Carpet installed on floors 12-2

Ceiling tile installed floors 13-2

Drywall on 1st floor for vaulted ceiling started

MEP Testing and Balancing

Inspections on floors 2 amp 1 to be complete

Carpet to be installed on floors 1 amp 2

Elevator Lobby Tile on Floors 1-4 amp 13

Stairwell remediation work to start

Elevator Modernization work on going

Elevator Jambs to start

Gas switch over

2

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 3

Administration Building

5th and 6th drywall installed

5th 6th and 9th floor glass walls field measured

New wood stair being built

9th floor framing completed

9th floor drywall

9th floor electrical being installed

Old boilers were demoed and new boilers were in place and being hooked up

3

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 4

CONNECT

ConnectTM is a web-based platform where all project data and documents are stored shared and accessible online with 24 hour access by Macomb County This allows Macomb County to track the progress of the project in real-time ensures that all parties are working off of the current documents (reducing the risk of errors) and minimizes communication costs and delays

Parking Structure

Request for Information One Hundred Thirty-Two (132) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with one (1) RFI remaining open

Submittals One Hundred Thirty-Four (134) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Old County Building

Request for Information Three Hundred Twenty-Six (326) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with ten (10) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Two Hundred Seventy-Four (274) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Administration Building

Request for Information Seventy-Eight (78) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with twelve (12) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Fifty-three (53) submittal packages are currently in the system with four (4) submittal packages remaining open

CRITIQUE

CritiqueTM is an experience-based tool that enables our project team to drastically reduce if not eliminate errors omissions and risky elements of design before a project starts It is deliverable based on years of systematic tracking from lessons learned on similar projects Benefits include reduction in owner change orders efficient and smooth construction process as issues are caught in the planning phase and reduction in warranty issues

Parking Structure

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Eighteen (18) Bulletins (Proposal Requests) Old County Building

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Twenty-One (21) Bulletins Administration Building

There have been two (2) Addendums issued and Twelve (12) Bulletins

4

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 5

CLARITY

ClarityTM is a Building Information Modeling (BIM) review process that enables Clark Construction Company to ensure before construction starts that MEP trade contractors will install their systems without interfering with each other This results in a reduced number of Owner change orders minimizes schedule delays as clashes are detected prior to mobilizing to complete the work and overall smoother construction flow

BIM coordination sign-off is complete for the Old County Building The final BIM model will be included in the closeout documents for the project It was agreed to do drawing coordination in lieu of BIM on Administration Circuit Court Talmer and Clemens Buildings as a Valued Engineering item This provided savings in cost and schedule This was accepted on all building where construction was performed per floor in occupied buildings After demolition is complete a full scan of the floor is required to initiate the BIM process adding a two week delay to the schedule There are numerous clash detection meetings required to complete the BIM process It was determined valuable to use at the Old County Building only

Technology

5

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 6

TECHNOLOGY

Parking Structure

Fiber optic connection to new IT Closet has been completed

Surveillance System infrastructure and Access Control System installation is nearly complete

Old County Building

Low Voltage Cabling is nearly complete

Low Voltage Cabling is currently in progress of being terminated on the IT Closet side

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Courtroom AV installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation has started

DocketCall (digital courtroom docket display) installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Emergency Notification System will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Administration Building

Low Voltage Cabling installation is in progress on Floors 5 6 and 9

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation to begin on Floors 5 6 and 9

BOC Auditorium AV design is nearly complete and will be reviewed with BOC Administration Once approved installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

CLOSER

CloserTM is a structured process agreed upon early between Macomb County Clark Construction Company Partners in Architecture and Wakely Associates and all Subcontractors on closing out the project within thirty (30) days of Substantial Completion The result is prompt turnover and use of your new facility

Parking Structure

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Punch List has been issued for the parking structure and scheduled to be performed on 71516 for the Welcome Center

Old County Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Incomplete work lists are currently being worked on for all floors

Punch List for Floors 12 issued to contractors Punch List on 11 thru 5 to be performed this month

Administration Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters to the contractors will be issued 6 weeks prior to completion of each floor

6

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 3: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 1

Macomb County Renovations

Monthly Progress Report July 2016

14784

Trade Hours worked in June 2016 1 recordable safety incident

(Cut on hand working without glove Did not follow 100 glove policy)

127544

Trade Hours worked to date on the project since May 2015

SAFETY

Parking Structure

Trade Hours to date 3815 Man Days = 30520 Man hours

Old County Building

Trade hours to date 11012 Man Days = 88096 Man hours

Administration Building

Trade hours to date 1116 Man Days = 8928 Man hours

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Title Macomb County Central Campus Renovations

Program Manager Plante Moran Cresa

Construction Manager Clark Construction

Architect (Project 1) Wakely Associates

Architect (Project 2) Partners in Architecture

Technology Designer Metro Tech

1

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 2

Program Budget

CLOCKWORKSCHEDULE ndash SEE ATTACHED FOR MASTER SCHEDULE

Parking Structure

Firemanrsquos stair installed

Traffic coating placed

Ornamental Fencing installed

Glass doors installed

Roofing complete

Terrazzo flooring Complete

Carpet and rubber stair being installed

Landscape being installed

Old County Building

Lights are installed on all floors

Inspections complete on floors 13-3

Elevator Lobby tile complete on floors 12-5

Carpet installed on floors 12-2

Ceiling tile installed floors 13-2

Drywall on 1st floor for vaulted ceiling started

MEP Testing and Balancing

Inspections on floors 2 amp 1 to be complete

Carpet to be installed on floors 1 amp 2

Elevator Lobby Tile on Floors 1-4 amp 13

Stairwell remediation work to start

Elevator Modernization work on going

Elevator Jambs to start

Gas switch over

2

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 3

Administration Building

5th and 6th drywall installed

5th 6th and 9th floor glass walls field measured

New wood stair being built

9th floor framing completed

9th floor drywall

9th floor electrical being installed

Old boilers were demoed and new boilers were in place and being hooked up

3

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 4

CONNECT

ConnectTM is a web-based platform where all project data and documents are stored shared and accessible online with 24 hour access by Macomb County This allows Macomb County to track the progress of the project in real-time ensures that all parties are working off of the current documents (reducing the risk of errors) and minimizes communication costs and delays

Parking Structure

Request for Information One Hundred Thirty-Two (132) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with one (1) RFI remaining open

Submittals One Hundred Thirty-Four (134) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Old County Building

Request for Information Three Hundred Twenty-Six (326) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with ten (10) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Two Hundred Seventy-Four (274) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Administration Building

Request for Information Seventy-Eight (78) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with twelve (12) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Fifty-three (53) submittal packages are currently in the system with four (4) submittal packages remaining open

CRITIQUE

CritiqueTM is an experience-based tool that enables our project team to drastically reduce if not eliminate errors omissions and risky elements of design before a project starts It is deliverable based on years of systematic tracking from lessons learned on similar projects Benefits include reduction in owner change orders efficient and smooth construction process as issues are caught in the planning phase and reduction in warranty issues

Parking Structure

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Eighteen (18) Bulletins (Proposal Requests) Old County Building

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Twenty-One (21) Bulletins Administration Building

There have been two (2) Addendums issued and Twelve (12) Bulletins

4

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 5

CLARITY

ClarityTM is a Building Information Modeling (BIM) review process that enables Clark Construction Company to ensure before construction starts that MEP trade contractors will install their systems without interfering with each other This results in a reduced number of Owner change orders minimizes schedule delays as clashes are detected prior to mobilizing to complete the work and overall smoother construction flow

BIM coordination sign-off is complete for the Old County Building The final BIM model will be included in the closeout documents for the project It was agreed to do drawing coordination in lieu of BIM on Administration Circuit Court Talmer and Clemens Buildings as a Valued Engineering item This provided savings in cost and schedule This was accepted on all building where construction was performed per floor in occupied buildings After demolition is complete a full scan of the floor is required to initiate the BIM process adding a two week delay to the schedule There are numerous clash detection meetings required to complete the BIM process It was determined valuable to use at the Old County Building only

Technology

5

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 6

TECHNOLOGY

Parking Structure

Fiber optic connection to new IT Closet has been completed

Surveillance System infrastructure and Access Control System installation is nearly complete

Old County Building

Low Voltage Cabling is nearly complete

Low Voltage Cabling is currently in progress of being terminated on the IT Closet side

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Courtroom AV installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation has started

DocketCall (digital courtroom docket display) installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Emergency Notification System will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Administration Building

Low Voltage Cabling installation is in progress on Floors 5 6 and 9

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation to begin on Floors 5 6 and 9

BOC Auditorium AV design is nearly complete and will be reviewed with BOC Administration Once approved installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

CLOSER

CloserTM is a structured process agreed upon early between Macomb County Clark Construction Company Partners in Architecture and Wakely Associates and all Subcontractors on closing out the project within thirty (30) days of Substantial Completion The result is prompt turnover and use of your new facility

Parking Structure

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Punch List has been issued for the parking structure and scheduled to be performed on 71516 for the Welcome Center

Old County Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Incomplete work lists are currently being worked on for all floors

Punch List for Floors 12 issued to contractors Punch List on 11 thru 5 to be performed this month

Administration Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters to the contractors will be issued 6 weeks prior to completion of each floor

6

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 4: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 2

Program Budget

CLOCKWORKSCHEDULE ndash SEE ATTACHED FOR MASTER SCHEDULE

Parking Structure

Firemanrsquos stair installed

Traffic coating placed

Ornamental Fencing installed

Glass doors installed

Roofing complete

Terrazzo flooring Complete

Carpet and rubber stair being installed

Landscape being installed

Old County Building

Lights are installed on all floors

Inspections complete on floors 13-3

Elevator Lobby tile complete on floors 12-5

Carpet installed on floors 12-2

Ceiling tile installed floors 13-2

Drywall on 1st floor for vaulted ceiling started

MEP Testing and Balancing

Inspections on floors 2 amp 1 to be complete

Carpet to be installed on floors 1 amp 2

Elevator Lobby Tile on Floors 1-4 amp 13

Stairwell remediation work to start

Elevator Modernization work on going

Elevator Jambs to start

Gas switch over

2

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 3

Administration Building

5th and 6th drywall installed

5th 6th and 9th floor glass walls field measured

New wood stair being built

9th floor framing completed

9th floor drywall

9th floor electrical being installed

Old boilers were demoed and new boilers were in place and being hooked up

3

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 4

CONNECT

ConnectTM is a web-based platform where all project data and documents are stored shared and accessible online with 24 hour access by Macomb County This allows Macomb County to track the progress of the project in real-time ensures that all parties are working off of the current documents (reducing the risk of errors) and minimizes communication costs and delays

Parking Structure

Request for Information One Hundred Thirty-Two (132) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with one (1) RFI remaining open

Submittals One Hundred Thirty-Four (134) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Old County Building

Request for Information Three Hundred Twenty-Six (326) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with ten (10) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Two Hundred Seventy-Four (274) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Administration Building

Request for Information Seventy-Eight (78) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with twelve (12) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Fifty-three (53) submittal packages are currently in the system with four (4) submittal packages remaining open

CRITIQUE

CritiqueTM is an experience-based tool that enables our project team to drastically reduce if not eliminate errors omissions and risky elements of design before a project starts It is deliverable based on years of systematic tracking from lessons learned on similar projects Benefits include reduction in owner change orders efficient and smooth construction process as issues are caught in the planning phase and reduction in warranty issues

Parking Structure

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Eighteen (18) Bulletins (Proposal Requests) Old County Building

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Twenty-One (21) Bulletins Administration Building

There have been two (2) Addendums issued and Twelve (12) Bulletins

4

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 5

CLARITY

ClarityTM is a Building Information Modeling (BIM) review process that enables Clark Construction Company to ensure before construction starts that MEP trade contractors will install their systems without interfering with each other This results in a reduced number of Owner change orders minimizes schedule delays as clashes are detected prior to mobilizing to complete the work and overall smoother construction flow

BIM coordination sign-off is complete for the Old County Building The final BIM model will be included in the closeout documents for the project It was agreed to do drawing coordination in lieu of BIM on Administration Circuit Court Talmer and Clemens Buildings as a Valued Engineering item This provided savings in cost and schedule This was accepted on all building where construction was performed per floor in occupied buildings After demolition is complete a full scan of the floor is required to initiate the BIM process adding a two week delay to the schedule There are numerous clash detection meetings required to complete the BIM process It was determined valuable to use at the Old County Building only

Technology

5

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 6

TECHNOLOGY

Parking Structure

Fiber optic connection to new IT Closet has been completed

Surveillance System infrastructure and Access Control System installation is nearly complete

Old County Building

Low Voltage Cabling is nearly complete

Low Voltage Cabling is currently in progress of being terminated on the IT Closet side

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Courtroom AV installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation has started

DocketCall (digital courtroom docket display) installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Emergency Notification System will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Administration Building

Low Voltage Cabling installation is in progress on Floors 5 6 and 9

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation to begin on Floors 5 6 and 9

BOC Auditorium AV design is nearly complete and will be reviewed with BOC Administration Once approved installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

CLOSER

CloserTM is a structured process agreed upon early between Macomb County Clark Construction Company Partners in Architecture and Wakely Associates and all Subcontractors on closing out the project within thirty (30) days of Substantial Completion The result is prompt turnover and use of your new facility

Parking Structure

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Punch List has been issued for the parking structure and scheduled to be performed on 71516 for the Welcome Center

Old County Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Incomplete work lists are currently being worked on for all floors

Punch List for Floors 12 issued to contractors Punch List on 11 thru 5 to be performed this month

Administration Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters to the contractors will be issued 6 weeks prior to completion of each floor

6

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 5: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 3

Administration Building

5th and 6th drywall installed

5th 6th and 9th floor glass walls field measured

New wood stair being built

9th floor framing completed

9th floor drywall

9th floor electrical being installed

Old boilers were demoed and new boilers were in place and being hooked up

3

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 4

CONNECT

ConnectTM is a web-based platform where all project data and documents are stored shared and accessible online with 24 hour access by Macomb County This allows Macomb County to track the progress of the project in real-time ensures that all parties are working off of the current documents (reducing the risk of errors) and minimizes communication costs and delays

Parking Structure

Request for Information One Hundred Thirty-Two (132) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with one (1) RFI remaining open

Submittals One Hundred Thirty-Four (134) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Old County Building

Request for Information Three Hundred Twenty-Six (326) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with ten (10) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Two Hundred Seventy-Four (274) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Administration Building

Request for Information Seventy-Eight (78) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with twelve (12) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Fifty-three (53) submittal packages are currently in the system with four (4) submittal packages remaining open

CRITIQUE

CritiqueTM is an experience-based tool that enables our project team to drastically reduce if not eliminate errors omissions and risky elements of design before a project starts It is deliverable based on years of systematic tracking from lessons learned on similar projects Benefits include reduction in owner change orders efficient and smooth construction process as issues are caught in the planning phase and reduction in warranty issues

Parking Structure

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Eighteen (18) Bulletins (Proposal Requests) Old County Building

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Twenty-One (21) Bulletins Administration Building

There have been two (2) Addendums issued and Twelve (12) Bulletins

4

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 5

CLARITY

ClarityTM is a Building Information Modeling (BIM) review process that enables Clark Construction Company to ensure before construction starts that MEP trade contractors will install their systems without interfering with each other This results in a reduced number of Owner change orders minimizes schedule delays as clashes are detected prior to mobilizing to complete the work and overall smoother construction flow

BIM coordination sign-off is complete for the Old County Building The final BIM model will be included in the closeout documents for the project It was agreed to do drawing coordination in lieu of BIM on Administration Circuit Court Talmer and Clemens Buildings as a Valued Engineering item This provided savings in cost and schedule This was accepted on all building where construction was performed per floor in occupied buildings After demolition is complete a full scan of the floor is required to initiate the BIM process adding a two week delay to the schedule There are numerous clash detection meetings required to complete the BIM process It was determined valuable to use at the Old County Building only

Technology

5

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 6

TECHNOLOGY

Parking Structure

Fiber optic connection to new IT Closet has been completed

Surveillance System infrastructure and Access Control System installation is nearly complete

Old County Building

Low Voltage Cabling is nearly complete

Low Voltage Cabling is currently in progress of being terminated on the IT Closet side

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Courtroom AV installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation has started

DocketCall (digital courtroom docket display) installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Emergency Notification System will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Administration Building

Low Voltage Cabling installation is in progress on Floors 5 6 and 9

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation to begin on Floors 5 6 and 9

BOC Auditorium AV design is nearly complete and will be reviewed with BOC Administration Once approved installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

CLOSER

CloserTM is a structured process agreed upon early between Macomb County Clark Construction Company Partners in Architecture and Wakely Associates and all Subcontractors on closing out the project within thirty (30) days of Substantial Completion The result is prompt turnover and use of your new facility

Parking Structure

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Punch List has been issued for the parking structure and scheduled to be performed on 71516 for the Welcome Center

Old County Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Incomplete work lists are currently being worked on for all floors

Punch List for Floors 12 issued to contractors Punch List on 11 thru 5 to be performed this month

Administration Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters to the contractors will be issued 6 weeks prior to completion of each floor

6

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 6: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 4

CONNECT

ConnectTM is a web-based platform where all project data and documents are stored shared and accessible online with 24 hour access by Macomb County This allows Macomb County to track the progress of the project in real-time ensures that all parties are working off of the current documents (reducing the risk of errors) and minimizes communication costs and delays

Parking Structure

Request for Information One Hundred Thirty-Two (132) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with one (1) RFI remaining open

Submittals One Hundred Thirty-Four (134) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Old County Building

Request for Information Three Hundred Twenty-Six (326) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with ten (10) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Two Hundred Seventy-Four (274) submittal packages are currently in the system with one (1) submittal package remaining open

Administration Building

Request for Information Seventy-Eight (78) RFIrsquos have been issued to date for the project with twelve (12) RFIrsquos remaining open

Submittals Fifty-three (53) submittal packages are currently in the system with four (4) submittal packages remaining open

CRITIQUE

CritiqueTM is an experience-based tool that enables our project team to drastically reduce if not eliminate errors omissions and risky elements of design before a project starts It is deliverable based on years of systematic tracking from lessons learned on similar projects Benefits include reduction in owner change orders efficient and smooth construction process as issues are caught in the planning phase and reduction in warranty issues

Parking Structure

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Eighteen (18) Bulletins (Proposal Requests) Old County Building

There has been one (1) Addendum issued and Twenty-One (21) Bulletins Administration Building

There have been two (2) Addendums issued and Twelve (12) Bulletins

4

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 5

CLARITY

ClarityTM is a Building Information Modeling (BIM) review process that enables Clark Construction Company to ensure before construction starts that MEP trade contractors will install their systems without interfering with each other This results in a reduced number of Owner change orders minimizes schedule delays as clashes are detected prior to mobilizing to complete the work and overall smoother construction flow

BIM coordination sign-off is complete for the Old County Building The final BIM model will be included in the closeout documents for the project It was agreed to do drawing coordination in lieu of BIM on Administration Circuit Court Talmer and Clemens Buildings as a Valued Engineering item This provided savings in cost and schedule This was accepted on all building where construction was performed per floor in occupied buildings After demolition is complete a full scan of the floor is required to initiate the BIM process adding a two week delay to the schedule There are numerous clash detection meetings required to complete the BIM process It was determined valuable to use at the Old County Building only

Technology

5

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 6

TECHNOLOGY

Parking Structure

Fiber optic connection to new IT Closet has been completed

Surveillance System infrastructure and Access Control System installation is nearly complete

Old County Building

Low Voltage Cabling is nearly complete

Low Voltage Cabling is currently in progress of being terminated on the IT Closet side

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Courtroom AV installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation has started

DocketCall (digital courtroom docket display) installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Emergency Notification System will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Administration Building

Low Voltage Cabling installation is in progress on Floors 5 6 and 9

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation to begin on Floors 5 6 and 9

BOC Auditorium AV design is nearly complete and will be reviewed with BOC Administration Once approved installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

CLOSER

CloserTM is a structured process agreed upon early between Macomb County Clark Construction Company Partners in Architecture and Wakely Associates and all Subcontractors on closing out the project within thirty (30) days of Substantial Completion The result is prompt turnover and use of your new facility

Parking Structure

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Punch List has been issued for the parking structure and scheduled to be performed on 71516 for the Welcome Center

Old County Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Incomplete work lists are currently being worked on for all floors

Punch List for Floors 12 issued to contractors Punch List on 11 thru 5 to be performed this month

Administration Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters to the contractors will be issued 6 weeks prior to completion of each floor

6

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 7: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 5

CLARITY

ClarityTM is a Building Information Modeling (BIM) review process that enables Clark Construction Company to ensure before construction starts that MEP trade contractors will install their systems without interfering with each other This results in a reduced number of Owner change orders minimizes schedule delays as clashes are detected prior to mobilizing to complete the work and overall smoother construction flow

BIM coordination sign-off is complete for the Old County Building The final BIM model will be included in the closeout documents for the project It was agreed to do drawing coordination in lieu of BIM on Administration Circuit Court Talmer and Clemens Buildings as a Valued Engineering item This provided savings in cost and schedule This was accepted on all building where construction was performed per floor in occupied buildings After demolition is complete a full scan of the floor is required to initiate the BIM process adding a two week delay to the schedule There are numerous clash detection meetings required to complete the BIM process It was determined valuable to use at the Old County Building only

Technology

5

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 6

TECHNOLOGY

Parking Structure

Fiber optic connection to new IT Closet has been completed

Surveillance System infrastructure and Access Control System installation is nearly complete

Old County Building

Low Voltage Cabling is nearly complete

Low Voltage Cabling is currently in progress of being terminated on the IT Closet side

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Courtroom AV installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation has started

DocketCall (digital courtroom docket display) installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Emergency Notification System will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Administration Building

Low Voltage Cabling installation is in progress on Floors 5 6 and 9

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation to begin on Floors 5 6 and 9

BOC Auditorium AV design is nearly complete and will be reviewed with BOC Administration Once approved installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

CLOSER

CloserTM is a structured process agreed upon early between Macomb County Clark Construction Company Partners in Architecture and Wakely Associates and all Subcontractors on closing out the project within thirty (30) days of Substantial Completion The result is prompt turnover and use of your new facility

Parking Structure

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Punch List has been issued for the parking structure and scheduled to be performed on 71516 for the Welcome Center

Old County Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Incomplete work lists are currently being worked on for all floors

Punch List for Floors 12 issued to contractors Punch List on 11 thru 5 to be performed this month

Administration Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters to the contractors will be issued 6 weeks prior to completion of each floor

6

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 8: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 6

TECHNOLOGY

Parking Structure

Fiber optic connection to new IT Closet has been completed

Surveillance System infrastructure and Access Control System installation is nearly complete

Old County Building

Low Voltage Cabling is nearly complete

Low Voltage Cabling is currently in progress of being terminated on the IT Closet side

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Courtroom AV installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation has started

DocketCall (digital courtroom docket display) installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Emergency Notification System will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

Administration Building

Low Voltage Cabling installation is in progress on Floors 5 6 and 9

Network Equipment Wireless Network and VoIP Phones have been ordered

Surveillance System and Access Control System installation to begin on Floors 5 6 and 9

BOC Auditorium AV design is nearly complete and will be reviewed with BOC Administration Once approved installation will begin as construction is near completion and the space is ldquodust-freerdquo

CLOSER

CloserTM is a structured process agreed upon early between Macomb County Clark Construction Company Partners in Architecture and Wakely Associates and all Subcontractors on closing out the project within thirty (30) days of Substantial Completion The result is prompt turnover and use of your new facility

Parking Structure

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Punch List has been issued for the parking structure and scheduled to be performed on 71516 for the Welcome Center

Old County Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters were issued to contractors Closeout documents are being collected we have received approximately 30 of required documents

Incomplete work lists are currently being worked on for all floors

Punch List for Floors 12 issued to contractors Punch List on 11 thru 5 to be performed this month

Administration Building

Closeout document logs have been created and letters to the contractors will be issued 6 weeks prior to completion of each floor

6

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 9: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 7

PROGRESS PHOTOS

Parking Deck from Above

7

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 10: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 8

Firemanrsquos Stair at Parking Structure Retaining Wall at East Side of Parking Structure

Admin Building 9th Floor Conference Room Soffit Framing Administration Building 9th Floor Lobby Framing

New 5th Floor Drywall in Administration Building

8

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 11: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 9

12th Floor Reception Window at Old County Building

Full Wall Tile in Elevator Lobbies at Old County Building Tile Wainscoting with Finished Paint at Old County Building

9

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 12: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 10

Completed Conference Room in Old County Building

Old County Building 1st Floor Ceiling Grid Old County Building Arched Entry Ceiling Framing

10

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 13: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

712016 Make Macomb Your Home 11

Epoxy Flooring in Old County Building Mechanical Rooms New Gas Meter at Old County Building

11

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 14: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

To David Flynn Board Chair

Macomb County Executive Mark A Hackel

From Pamela J Lavers Deputy County Executive

Date July 5 2016

Mark F Deldin Deputy County Executive

RE Agenda Item- Planning amp Economic Development Budget Amendment Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Attached you will find documentation and a resolution from Planning amp Economic Development Director John Paul Rea to approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources

The Executive Office respectfully submits this agenda item for the Commissions consideration and recommends approval of the Grant Fund 361 budget amendment as stated above

PJLsmf

cc John Paul Rea Stephen Smigiel

12

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 15: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

MACOMB COUNTY MICHIGAN ~~~ -~

RESOLUTION Resolution to

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants - Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Additional Background Information (If Needed)

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenue side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

Committee Meeting Date

James Carabelli amp Robert Mijac Co-Chairs InfrastructureEconomic Development Committee

InfrastructureEconomic Development 7-19-16

13

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 16: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

DATE 06222016

-TO Office of County Executive ~ ~

FROM John Paul Rea AICP - Director

Macomb County Planning amp Economic Development RE REQUEST APPROVAL I ADOPTION OF

Budget Amendment - Planning Grants- Fund 361 SUBJECT

Approve a $49500 budget amendment under Planning Grants- Fund 361 for a Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION _ ______ - ~- __

The County has been awarded grant monies in the amount of $20000 from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources- Forest Resources Division to administer an Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

FISCAL IMPA~TFNANCING

The project will total $49500 with In-Kind Wages of $29500

On the revenu~ side State-Grants will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Revenue will be increased by $29500 On the expense side CS-Other will be increased by $20000 and In-Kind Wages will be increased by $29500

F~CTS AND PJWVISIQN~ L_LEGAL RJQUIREMENT~ If applica_le)_ NA

_IVI__P~CT ON_ C_JRRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

- z

14

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 17: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

0 c

foliO MDrll A Hockel Cot111t Pfteutii~

Department Leader

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 IXIcan Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288 CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION

Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

DEPARTMENT ROUTING amp AUTHORIZATIONS NOTES

1 RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT-

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT

fY Approved l

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

GRANT

~AWARD o Funded

Return By Date

01122016

~ RECEIVED gt -~

~ t JAN 1 5 2016 Q)-

RETURN TO

RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~ ()MACOMB COUNTY _c_middot_-l_t__amp~ ____ I FINANce

Date

~ Approved

D Approved with changes

D Rejected ~ RETURN TO bull A L 3 Mltult( ~_

RISKampCONTRACTMANA~~ Date

D BOC Review Required

D Approved with changes

D Rejected

RETURN TO RISK amp CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

~1lt~11 Date

0

~ iii

~ a FEB 0 2 2016 E ern

i toRPORATION COUNSEL c Q)

middot 0

0 E rn

ii5 0 Q) gt iii 0 Q)

a E Q)

E t Cl c Q)

0

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FEB 0 3 2016

RECEIVED

15

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 18: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

CONTRACT REVIEW ROUTING FORM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION

Department Leader Department Date

John Paul Rea Planning amp Economic Development 01052016 Contract Contact Person Contact Phone Number NOTE Contracts are returned Interoffice mail unless specified below

Gerard Santoro 469-6443 [ZPau Jennifer Belch for Pick Up 469-6288

CONTACT I PROGRAM INFORMATION Contract I Program Title

Urban amp Community Forestry Grant Program

Vendor Number (if known) Vendor Name

Original Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Amended Contract Amount

$ 2000000 $ $ 2000000 Contract Begin Dale Amendment Date Contract End Date

11302015 09152016 ~ tract If Renewal or Amendment what terms have changed (if any)

~New Renewal

Amendment

~ GRANT

~AWARD (County Recipient)

_ Funded (Program)

Vendor sectYes Disclosure IFAS

Form Attached No (NA)

Funding Source - Org Key I Object - (If known)

Targeted Committee Date

Amendment Number

Contract Bid If not bid out please explain Lowest Bid If not lowest bid please explain

Lives

0No

Oves

ONo Bid Number How many bidders responded Winning bidder Macomb County Entity

Oves [j No - Explain

Contract I Program Synopsis

OTHER CONTRACT INFORMATION

D CQNTRACT REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE ONLY DESIGNEE SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE ITEM BELOW (IF APPLICABLE) -- i- 1 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $35000 OR MORE FOR SERVICES SUPPLIES MATERIALS EQUIPMENT OR REAL ESTATE

2 AWARDING A CONTRACT OF $100000 OR MORE FOR CONSTRUCTION

3 AWARDING A CONTRACT MODIFICATION EXCEEDING 10 OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED CONTRACT AMOUNT -4 AWARDING A CONTRACT THAT EXCEEDS 5 YEARS IN LENGTH -5 EMPLOYER PAID FRINGE BENEFITS -6 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

7 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS AS DEFINED BY CHARTER SECTION 31 0

16

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 19: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

0 1 lt -ft~IG ~

Mark A Hackel County Executive

January 5 2016 Date

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 South Main Street 7th Floor + Mount Clemens Michigan 48043

Phone (586) 469-5285 Fax (586) 469-6787 wwwpedmacombgovorg

Office of County Executive County of Macomb One South Main gth Floor Mount Clemens Ml 48043

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUEST APPROVAL ADOPTION OF

Stephen N Cassin AICP Director

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

SUBJECT

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)- Forest Resources Division approved funding in the amount of $20000 towards comple-tion of project

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXECUTIVE SUBMIT TO THE BOARD

This award is under the $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

PURPOSE JUSTIFICATION

NA

FISCAL IMPACT FINANCING

This award is under $35000 limit and does not have to be approved by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

17

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 20: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

FACTS AND PROVISION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

NA

CONTRACTING PROCESS

NA

IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (PROJECTS)

NA

Respectfully submitted

Signature

John Paul Rea AICP- Director PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

PLANNING amp ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

21Page

18

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 21: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

Mr Gerard Santoro

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LANSING

November 30 2015

Macomb County Planning amp Econ Devl 1 S Main St 7th Fl Mt Clemens Ml 48043

Dear Mr Santoro

KEITH CREAGH DIRECTOR

Thank you for your interest in the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Community Forestry Grant program This program Is administered by the DNRs Urban and Community Forestry Program with funding from the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry (CFDA 1 0664)

The committee has completed reviews of the 2015-16 Community Forestry Grant applications and I am pleased to inform you that your request was among those recommended for funding

We have approved funding in the amount of $2000000 towards completion of your project If for any reason you are not able to use these grant funds please notify me as soon as possible so that I may reissue these funds to another project

I have enclosed two copies of the Grant Agreement (PR 4107 -3) Please review the information including the grant amount Federal Employer Identification Number tax number) and contact persons Information for accuracy

Please sign and return both copies of the Grant Agreement as soon as possible The grant ls no~ effective until I have signeddatsd the agreement

Also enclosed are the following forms bull Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107 -3A) bull Communlty Forestry Grant Program Volunteer Time Record (PR 401 0) bull Community Forestry Grantees Financial Grant Report (PR 4107-5) bull USDA Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace (Form AD~1 049) bull Request for Tax Payer Identification Number and Certification (Form W-9)

Grant payment will be made upon completion of the project Payment may be requested a soon as the project is completed it is not necessary to wait until the end of the grant period Payment requests must be made no later than 30 days after the grant expiration date The grant expires September 152016 and will not be extended beyond this date

Please contact me if you have any questions about the grant My return address Is DNR Forest Resources Division PO Box 30452 Lansing Ml48909-7952

KTSkr Enclosures

Since~ ~---_ Kevin Sayers t-lt-gt

517-284-5898 sayerslltmigov

CONSTITUTION HALL bull 625 WEST ALLEGAN STREET bull PO BOX 30028 bulllANSING MICHIGAN 48909-7528 www_michigangovdnrmiddot (517) 284-5900

19

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 22: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM

GRANT AGREEMENT I

Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 Subjectto the provisions of the law and the conditions herein contained

41 This grant is subject to federal and state terms and conditions listed at httplwwwwhitehousegovombqrimts attachwhich and contained in Ml DNR Attachment 1 (IC4167middot9)

Grant reimbursement may be made upon verification of actual expenditures an9 in accordance with conditions listed In 1 above

43 Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant

middot period ends and In accordance with the conditions listed In 1 above

Public Act 533 of 2004 requires that payments under this

contract be processed by electronic funds transfer (EFT) Contractor Is required to register to receive payment by EFT at the Contract amp Payment Express website

44 All statements publications or presentations concerning the grant will contain an acknowledgment of the Federal (USDA Forest Service) and Stales (DNR) participation and support Attachment 1 provides further Information

45 The Grantee hereby assures and certifies to comply with all Stale and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements Also the applicant assures and certifies with respect to the agreement that it possesses legal authority to apply for the grant

6 This contract is not valid until it has been signed by both the grantee and the Departments Representative The date of the Department Representatives signature will constitute the starting date of the grant

I the undersigned cerlify that I have read understand and agree to comply with this agreement the conditions listed above and in the referenced websites and attachments and have authority to enter into this agreement middotan behalf of Grantee

Date

URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM FOREST RESOURCES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POBOX30452 LANSING Ml48909-7952

The USDA Forest Service and Michigan Department of Natural Resources are equal opportunity employers PR4107-3 (Rev 11102014)

20

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 23: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Forest Resources Division

URBAN amp COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT

ATTACHMENT 1 Issued under authority of Part 5 of Act 451 PA 1994 as amended and the US Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 CFDA 10664 to provide information regarding terms and conditions of Community Forestry Program

grants Subject to the provisions of the Jaw and conditions herein contained

In this Attachment the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division is referred to as the Department Acting for the State is the Grant Officer Bill ONeill referred to as the State The Grant SupeNisor is Kevin Sayers

SECTION 1 GRANT

This grant consists of the Grantees Community Forestry Grant Application and Information (PR 41 07) Grant Agreement (PR4107-3) Grant Agreement Attachment 1 (IC 4107-3A) and other written and oral instructions from the Grant SupeNisor

SECTION 2 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

The State agrees to reimburse the Grantee for authorized expenditures as listed in the Grant Agreement upon verification of actual expenditures for both the 50 federal award portion and the 50 local match portion This sum is not to exceed the actual costs or grant award amount whichever is less Request for payments may be made when the project has been completed but must be received no later than 30 days after the grant period ends Final payment will be made upon completion of the project and compliance with State reporting and auditing requirements Failure to meet these deadlines may result in nonshyreimbursement to the Grantee

SECTION 3 REPORTING AND AUDITING REQUIREMENTS

As well as conferring with the DNR Grant SupeNisor the Grantee will file a final summary and financial report as well as any other progres reports as requested The final financial report will be submitted upon completion of the project The reports shall specify total expenditures broken down as to the federal portion and the Grantees share of costs Total expenditures will be broken down by major budget categories Reports will be accompal)ied by documentation showing that the charges are for allowable purposes and that the expenditure listings are accurate and suitable for audit In addition to the summary documentation submitted to the Department the Grantee will keep complete financial records such that all charges whether paid from grant funds or from the Grantees matching funds can be readily traced to their origins Basic documents required to be maintained for audit include purchase orders vouchers authorizing payments time records for individual employees and volunteers hours charged to this program

The Grantees progress report(s) will be submitted on forms supplied by the Department Supplementary information summarizing accomplishments will be included in narrative form The project and related reports are subject to audit by both the Department and the USDA ForestSeNice This may include both financial audits and site visits Grantees receiving $300000 or more of federal assistance in one year must comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 which includes an audit prepared by a recognized independent certified public accountant A copy of this report must be submitted to the Department

SECTION 4 ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT CHANGES

From time to time changes may be needed in the scope of the project and the grant All changes must qe approved by the

Grant SupeNisor Changes must be in writing and approved in advance

SECTION 5 STANDARDS OF WORK

In determining whether or not the Grantee has performed its obligations it is agreed and understood that the Grant Officer shall rely on the evaluation of the SupeNisor The Grant Officer or the SupeNisor may issue written or oral instructions Any instructions that affect the scope of work price period of performance or any other provision of the Grant must be in accordance with specific provisions of the Gran f The Grantee agrees that the performance of the seNices under this Grant shall be performed to high professional standards

SECTION 6 CANCELLATION

Cancellation of the Grant by the State may be for (a) default by the Grantee or (b) lack of further need for the seNice at the location named in the Grant Default is defined as the failure of the Grantee tomiddot comply with any term or condition of this Grant In case of default by the Grantee the State may cancel the Grant immediately and procure the seNices from other sources The State can make payment up to 20 of the grant award for any reimbursable non-cancelable expenditures that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant SupeNisor and com~tlies with other grant requirements In the event the State no longer needs the service specified in the Grant due to program changes changes in laws rules or regulations relocation of offices or lack offunding the State may cancel the Grant by giving the Grantee written notice of such cancellation thirty (30) days prior to the date of cancellation The Grantee can request reimbursement for reasonable non~ cancelable expenditures made prior to the date of the written notice of cancellation that have been completed to the satisfaction of the Grant Supervisor and complies with other grant requirements

SECTION 7 DISPUTES

Except as otherwise provided for in this Grant any dispute arising under this Grant which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Grant Officer who shall teduce hisher decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy to the Grantee The decision of the Grant Officer shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy the Grantee mails or otherwise furnishes to the Grant Officer a written appeal Pending final decision of disputes the Grantee shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Grant and in accordance with the Grant Officers decision

SECTION 8 0FF1CilLS NOT TO BENEFIT

No member of the Legislature of the State of Michigan or any individual employed by the State shall be allowed any share or part of this Gran_t or to any benefit that may arise

Page 1 of 4 IC4107-3A (Rev 71142014)

21

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 24: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SECTION 9 COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES

The Grantee warrants that heshe has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee to solicit or secure this Grant and that heshe has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Grantee any fee commission percentage brokerage fee gift or middot other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Grant For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this Grant without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Grant price or consideration the full amount of such commission percentage brokerage or contingent fee

SECTION 10 INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF GRANTEE

The parties agree that the Grantee in the performance of this Grant shall act in an independent capacity and not as officer employee or agent of the State and shall assure any and all obligations from liability that may arise out of or in connection with this grant middot

SECTION 11 ASSIGNABILITY

This Grant is not assignable by the Grantee either in whole or in part

SECTION 1-2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Final inspection and acceptance of all work required under this middot Grant shall be performed by the Supervisor the Grant Officer or such person as heshe may duly authorize in writing

SECTION 13 GRATUITIES

a The State may by written notice to the Grantee terminate the right of the Grantee to proceed under this Grant if it is found after notice and hearing by the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative that gratuities in the form of entertainment gifts or otherwise were offered or given by the Grantee or any agent or representative of the Grantee to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing a grant or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending or the making of any determinations with respecfto the performing of such grant provided that the existence of the facts upon which the Grant Officer or hisher duly authorized representative makes hisher duly authorized representative makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in any competent court

b The rights and remedies of the State provided in this paragraph shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Grant

SECTION 14 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF

PARTICIPATION

News Releases middotNews releases pertaining to this grant or the services study data or project to which it relates will not be made without prior written State approval and then only in accordance with the explicit written instructions from the State

Publication The Grantee will not use release or publish any analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement or any information derived therefrom until such analyses findings or techniques have been reported to the State in the manner prescribed by this agreement and have become public domain These analyses findings or techniques will be considered in the public domain when 1) they are submitted to the State and receive positive action 2) they are formally accepted by the State or 3) ninety (90) days elapse after submission to the State whichEver of the three may occur first No material may be published which is exempt from disclosure under Public Act No 442 of 1976 known as the Freedom of Information Act without express permission from the State The Grantee will provide the State for its review copies of all presentations of articles being submitted for publication at least thirty (30) days in advance Acknowledgment of State ParticipationSupport and Federal ParticipationSupport All publications or oral presentations concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain middotan acknowledgment of the States participation and support unless the State requests in writing that their participation and support not be acknowledged All publications or oral presentationsmiddot concerning the analyses findings results or techniques developed under this agreement will contain an acknowledgment of themiddotunited States Department of Agriculture Forest Services participation and support Furthermore Grantee may not receive fees for any article in excess of the cost of

middot preparation of published articles and excluding the cost of the research and compilation which was compensated under the Agreement

Where appropriate this credit line should be used for news releases publications reports and other communications This (brochure publication project or other appropriate title) was supported in part by a grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources Division and the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Program Where appropriate project signs or other information placards should acknowledge Department and USDA Forest SeNice support Specific wording will be determined by the Grantee and Grant Supervisor Use of DNR or USFS logos requires preapproval from the grant supervisor andor USFS

SECTION 15 NON OISCRIMINATION

In connection with the performance of work under this Grant the Grantee agrees as follows a In accordance with Act No 453 Public Acts of 1976 the

Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for middotemployment with respect to hire tenure terms conditions or privileges or employment or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race color religion~ national origin age sex height weight or marital status Breach of this covenant may be regarded as a material breach of this Grant

b The Grantee agrees that any and all subcontracts to this Grant where a portion of the work set forth in this Grant is to be performed shall contain a covenant the same as set forth in paragraph a

Page 2 of4 IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

22

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 25: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

c The Grantee will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status Such action shall include but not be limited to the following employment upgrading demotion or transfer recruitment advertising layoff or termination_ rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship middot

d The Grantee will in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Grantee state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration_ for employment without regard to their race color religion national origin age sex height weight or marital status

e The Grantee will comply with all relevant published rules regulations directives and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual State project

f In the event that the MCRC finds after a hearing held pursuant to its rules that a Grantee has not complied with the contractual obligations under this Grant the MCRC may as part of its order based upon such findings certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan which Administrativesoard may order the cancellation of the Grant found to have been violated andor declare the Grantee ineligible for future grants with the State of IV]ichlgan and its political and civil subdivisions departments and officers including the governing boards of institutions in higher education until the Grantee complies with said order of the MCRC Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the Grantee is declared ineligible to grant as a granting party in future grants In any case before the MCRC in which cancellation of an existing grant is a possibility the granting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the MCRC to participate in such proceedings

g The Grantee will comply With Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976 the Michigan Handicappers Civil Rights Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 PL 93-112 both of which prohibit discrimination against handicapped persons

SECTION 16 PRICE

Prices quoted by the Grantee shall be the maximum to be charged during the Grant period the State shall receive the benefit of any decrease in price that may occur

SECTION 17 TAXES

The State is exempt from Federal Excise Tax and State or Local Sales Tax Bid prices shall not include such taxes Exemption Certificates for Federal Excise Tax will be furnished upon request

SECTION 18 INDEMNIFICATION

The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State and its agents and employees from and against all claims damages losses and expenses including but not limited to reasonable attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the contracting out of and or performance of the work which includes all labor material and equipment required to produce

Page 3 of4

the commodity construction andor service required by the Grant provided that any such claim damage loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury sickness disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified

In any and all claims against the State or any of its agents or employees by any employee middotof the Grantee any subgrantee anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable the indemnification obligation under this Grant shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages compensation or benefits payable by or for the Grantee or any subgrantee under workers compensation acts disability benefit acts or other employee benefits acts

The obligations of the Grantee under this Grant shall not extend to the liability of the State its agents or employees arising out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps drawings opinions reports surveys middotchange orders designs or specifications or (2) the giving of or the failure to give directions or instructions by the State its agents or employees

SECTION 19 GRANTEES LIABILITY INSURANCE

The Grantee shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect himher from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Grantees operations under the Grant whether such operations be by himselfherself or by a subgrantee or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable

a Claims under workers compensation disability benefit and other similar employee benefit act A non-resident Grantee shall have insurance for benefits payable under Michigans Workers Compensation Law for any employee resident of and hired in Michigan and as respects to any other employee protected by workers compensation laws of any other state the Grantee shall have insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable to any such employee

b Claims for damages because of bodily injury occupational sickness or disease or death of hfs employee

c Claims for damages because of bodily injury sickness or disease or death of any person other than his employee subject to limits of liability of not less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

d Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom subject to a limit of liability of not less than $50000 each occurrence for non-automobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards

e Insurance for subparagraphs 3 and 4 non-automobile hazards on a combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300000 each occurrence and when applicable $300000 annual aggregate

IC4107-3A (Rev 7142014)

23

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 26: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability specified or required by law whichever is greater and shall include contractual liability insurance as applicable to the Grantees obligations under the indemnification clause of this Grant

SECTION 20 SOURCE OF FUNDS- TERMINATION The States payment of funds for purposes of this Grant is subject to and conditional upon the availability of funds for such purposes being Federal andor State funds No commitment is made by the State to continue or expand such activities The State may terminate this Grant immediately upon written notice to the Grantee at any time prior to the completion of this Grant if in the opinion of the State funding becomes unavailable for this service such funds are restricted In the event of termination reimbursement of reasonable non-cancelable expenditures in accordance with Section 6 may be provided

SECTION 21 FEES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING The Grantee shall not seek nor obtain funding through fees or charges to any clientmiddot receiving services for which the State reimburses the Grantee under this Grant The Grantee guarantees that any claims made to the State under this Grant shallmiddot not be financed by any source other than the State under the terms of this Grant If funding is received through any other source the Grantee shall delete from Grantee billings or shall immediately refund to the State the total amount representing such duplication offunding middot

middotSECTION 22 PUBLICATION MAPPROVALAND COPYRJGiT The State and Grantee shall have co-copyright property and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this Grant The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this Grant without prior written permission of the State However it is mutually agreed that the Grantee shall have the right to publish and disseminate work products under this Grant provided that the Grantee shall recover only costs associated with printing and mailing and further that such publication shall contain a reference to the State as being the holder of the copyright to the work This provision applies to press releases and written and visual materials specifically identified in this Grant and shall not restrict the rights of the Grantee to publish in scholarly journals or to present new basic information in any way

SECTION 23 RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS The Grantee shall maintain such records and accounts including property personnel and financial records as are deemed necessary by the Granting Officer to assure a proper accounting for all project funds Such records shall be the property of the State and made available for audit purposes The Grantee shall install and maintain an accounting system to identify and support all expenditures billed to the State under this Grant The accounting system must record all income and e~penses for the Grantees total program of which services provided under this Grant are a part The accounting system as a minimum shall consist of a chart of accounts cash receipts journal cash disbursements journal and general ledger All expenditures and income must be supported by vouchers and receipts that detail the reason for the transaction The Grantee shall maintain within the accounting system salary and fringe benefits accounts that break out positions hospitalization retirement workers compensation and other

middotfringe benefits The Grantee shall establish and maintain payroll middot

records for all employees The Grantee in establishing and allocating salary and wages for employees shall support these charges by electing to establish either 1 An adequate appointment and workload distribution system

accompanied by monthly reviews showing the actual changes in the workload distribution of each employee (ie an exception reporting system) or

2 A monthly_ after-the-fact certification system which requires persons in supervisory positions having first-hand knowledge of the services performed middotto report the distribution of effort (ie a positive reporting system)

SECTION 24 REVIEW AND MONITORING REPORTS The Grantee shall comply with all program and fiscal review reporting procedures as are or may be established by the State in completion of monitoring and progress reports at time intervals and on forms specified by the State Any additional reports as deemed necessary by the Supervisor shall be made and ~ubmitted by the Grantee upon request

SECTION 25 ExAMINATIONANDMAINTENANCEOFRECORDS The Grantee shall permit the State or any of its identified agents access to the facilities being utilized at any reasonable time to observe the operation of the program Further the Grantee shall retain all books records or other documents relevant to the Grant for six years after final payment at hisher cost and federal auditors and any other duly authorized by the State shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the material during the period If an audit is initiated prior to the expiration of the six year period and extends part that period all documents shall be maintained until the audit is completed The State shall provide findings and recommendations of audits to the Grantee The State shall adjust future payments or final payment if the findings of an audit indicate over or under payment to the Grantee in the period prior to the audit If no payments are due and owing the Grantee the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts which may be due the State The Grantee shall assure as a condition of any sale or transfer of ownership of the Grantee agency that the new purchasers or owners maintain the above described books records or other documents for any unexpired portion of the six year period after final payment under this Grant or the Grantee shall otherwise maintain the records as the State may direct The Grantee shall if heshe ceases business operations maintain the records as the State may direct

SECTION 26 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL lAWS RULES REGULATIONS The Grantee will comply with all State and Federal laws rules regulations policies guidelines and requirements including all applicable administrative requirements and cost principles found at httpwwwwhitehousegovombqrants default Choose the Which Circular do I follow link for direction on which set of requiremen~s to follow

Section 27- SUSPENDED AND DEBARRED PARTIES

Subawards to debarred and suspended parties Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or

middotpermit any award (subgrant or contract) as any tier to any party which is debarred suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs Lmder Executive Order 12549 Debarment and Suspension List of debarred parties httpslwwwsamgovportalpublicSAMI

Page4of4 tC41073A (Rev 7142014)

24

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 27: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Farm Bill Programs Initiative The 2016 funding year had the staff working with nearly 35 applicants generating 48 contracts some of which are applicants with multiple contracts Below is a breakdown of the contracts applied and what was approved for funding

This has allocated over $1000000 to fund 3500 acres within St Clair and Macomb Counties in a wide variety of conservation activity

Practices5 Agrichemical Handling Facility 3000 acres for 3 years Nutrient Management

06 acres Alley Cropping 4 On Farm Secondary Containment Facility28 acres Brush Management 98 acres for 3 years Prescribed Grazing15 acres Conservation Cover 150 acres for 3 years Residue Management No-Till

1200 acres for 3 years Conservatio Crop Rotation 1 Roof and Cover3000 acres for 3 years Cover Crop 3 Roof and Runoff Structure

3 Fence 2 Subsurface Drain50 acres Forage and Biomass Planting 10 acres TreeShrub Establishment

5 Grade Stabilization Structure 1 Underground Outlet2 acres Grassed Waterway 1 Waste Separation Facility

4 Heavy Use Area Protection 1 Waste Storage Facility6 acres Herbaceous Weed Control 7 Waste Transfer

4 High Tunnel System 2 Watering Facility3000 acres for 3 years Integrated Pest Management 4 Well Decommissioning

1 Livestock Pipeline This year they called for a second round of signup for applications that were not approved the first sign up This allows additional contracts to potentially be funded for FY 2016

At this time for our 2016 conservation planning we are working with 20 new applicants to apply for funding this fall for FY2017 Practices from Agrichemical Handling facility bank stabilization and many high tunnel systems We have also had to start a 2017 conservation planning in which we intend to service these if the 2016 conservation planning time allows Presently containing 7 applicants

Total Contracts Total Funding Acres

Contracts Approved

Funding Approved Acres

48 $2390154 5764 33 $1132581 3573

ROUND 2 APPLICANTS Contracts Obligations Acres

9 $1257573 2200

St Clair Conservation District USDA Service Center

2830 Wadhams Road Kimball MI 48074

wwwSanilacCDorgstclair PH 810-984-3865 ext5 | FAX 855-813-7689

Administrator email Joekautzminacdnetnet

25

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 28: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

OTHER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ACTIVITY

In other activity this past year the St Clair amp Sanilac Conservation District has spent time servicing Macomb County with the following programs or activities Partnering with the Macomb Conservation District Board of Directors The partnership of the St Clair and Sanilac CD is being expanded to the Macomb CD to help them with the troubled times This past spring the Macomb CD Board of Directors has decided that it would close the CD office due to lack of programs and available funding In an effort to preserve the popular reforestationtree sale program the partnership work together to send out mailings and advertisement throughout Macomb County Upon tree seedling pickup several people from Macomb thanked the conservation district for offering these ldquoout of countyrdquo services to them Currently we are trying to figure out logistics of offering a 3rd pickup location to be located in Macomb County for spring of 2017 Since closure of the Macomb CD office files and other needed paperwork have been re-located to the St Clair CD office to be available for servicing Macomb County residents As mentioned before the St Clair CD office is located with the St Clair amp Macomb County USDA This unique location offers an advantage to continue servicing landowners in the Macomb County agriculture sector with ease The St Clair and Sanilac Conservation Districtsrsquo Board of Directors also continue to explore options of Conservation District consolidation to create one board of directors encompassing combined counties and also creating equal representation within the jurisdictional boundaries This approach would decrease administrative overhead and offer more opportunity to secure conservationenvironmental programs to service residents of all counties Conservation Technical Assistance Initiative (CTAI) This past year the Conservation District has been busy looking for grants to utilize the Macomb appropriations of and additional $20000 to be used by the Conservation District Partnership Unfortunately we were unable to secure a grant that required match Good news however we secured a CTAI grant that is fully funded by MDARD and USDA With such great success with the Farm Bill Program Initiative in Macomb St Clair and Sanilac Counties these two agencies seen the need to fund an additional person to help NRCS with implementing the new projects that these funds are allocated to Continued Support The Farm Bill Program that Macomb County helps fund will be entering its thirdfinal year of the original grant this fall The Conservation District will be working with USDA-NRCS to renew this agreement beginning in the fall of 2017 Momentarily we donrsquot know how much local match will be required for a renewal of this agreement Once this required match is known the Conservation District will begin working with the Commissioners of both Macomb and St Clair Counties to continue this successful program In the past year Joe Kautz District Manager has met with the Executiversquos Office Joe and Mr Lorenzo had great conversation about Conservation District functions as well as discussion of the additional $20000 allocation The Conservation District will be scheduling another meeting with the Executiversquos Office to continue educating about the needs of conservation programs in Macomb County The Conservation District would like to secure the support from the Executiversquos Office for continued funding of the additional $20000 if needed for local match for more grants

26

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 29: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

AndrewKimDirectorofLegislativeAffairsMacombCountyBoardofCommissionersCountyAdministrationBuilding1SMainStreet9thFloorMountClemensMI48043June142016MacombCountyCommissionersIamwritinginsupportofLine5IwanttobesureyouandyourshaveallthefactsonthisimportantsourceofoilandgasfortheStateofMichiganasyouconsideranyresolutionstorestrictitsuseFirstitisimportanttoknowthatLine5iscrucialtomeetingthestatersquosenergyneedsItsuppliesmorethanhalfofthestatersquospropaneFurther30percentofthecrudeoildeliveredbyLine5servesMichiganarearefineriesLine5iscriticaltokeepingyourcarsandmanufacturinglinesmovingThatiswhytheStaterequesteditbebuiltbackthe1950storeplaceoiltankersandmoveenergysafelyandefficientlyacrosstheStraitsofMackinacIknowsafetyisyourprimaryconcernsoIwantedtoprovideyousomedetailsonhowour120employeesandcontractorsinthestateofMichiganworkyearroundtomaintainLine5ItrsquoswiththisinformationthatIcansaywithconfidencethatLine5issafe

1) Itwasconstructedtoincrediblyhighstandards

Line5wasoverengineeredandconstructedtothehigheststandardswhichmeetorexceedtodayrsquosstandardsfornewpipelineconstructionAttheStraitsofMackinacthe30rdquoLine5pipelinesplitsintotwo20-inch-diameterparallelpipelinesTheuniquedesignenhancessafetyintheStraitsasitlowersthepressureandstressonthelinesandminimizestheamountofproductcarriedperlineThosetwinpipelinesareseamlessnearly1rdquothickandcoatedwithfiber-reinforcedenamelcoatingrecognizedasoneofthemostsuperiorpipelineprotectionmaterialsintheworldDevelopedbyBechtelCorporationthesamefirmthatbuilttheMackinacBridgeLine5isavitalpieceofMichiganinfrastructure

2) Itisoperatedsafelyandwellmaintained

ThereisalotthatgoesintooperatingLine5safelytoprotecttheenvironmentLine5wastestedat1200psiandpermittedtooperateat600psibutactuallyoperatesat150PSIone-quarterthemaximumallowableoperationalpressureForcontexttheaveragewaterpressurerangeforagardenhoseis40to80psiThisreducesstressonthesystemWemitigatecorrosionthroughcathodicprotectionwherealow-levelelectricalcurrentisappliedtopreventthesteelfromreactingtotheenvironmentalconditionsWealsoroutinelycleantheinteriorwallsusingspecialtoolsThesearejustsomeoftheroutinemeasuresinplacetokeepLine5operatingsafely

3) Inspectionsshowitisverygoodcondition

TheEnbridgePipelineIntegrityteamworkswiththirdpartycontractorstocompletethoroughinternalandexternalinspectionsofLine5whicharereviewedbythePipelineandHazardousMaterialsSafetyAdministration

27

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 30: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

(PHMSA)thefederalpipelineregulatorRecentinspectionreportsshowthattheLine5crossingattheStraitswhilenotperfectisinverygoodconditionWeusestate-of-the-artremoteoperatedvehiclesandcertifieddiversexaminetheexternalprotectivecoatingonLine5reviewthescrewanchorsystemthatsecuresthepipetothelakebedandmeasurethedistancebetweensupportspansToinspectinsidethelinewerundevicescalledldquopigsrdquothatworklikesmallMRImachinestravelingthelinerecordingdataonthepipersquosthicknessandlookforcracksdentsorsignsofcorrosionThisdataissharedwithourfederalregulatorsandwesharedthisinformationwiththestateofMichiganWealsopostedkeyfindingsofourLine5StraitsdataonourwebsitehttpwwwenbridgecomLine5RecentlyPHMSAreviewednearlytwodecadesofdataontheStraitscrossinglookingatthingslikemetallosscrackingdeformationpipemovementandcombinationsofallthefindingsdatingbackto1998ItdeterminedthatnoremediationworkwasneededintheEastorWestsectionsoftheLine5StraitsofMackinaccrossingsandthatcurrentinspectionfrequencywasappropriategiventheconditionofLine5Thisreportcanbefoundat

phmsadotgovstaticfilesPHMSADownloadableFilesFilesEnbridge_Makinac_Straits_ILI_Reviewpdf

4) Itismonitoredcarefully247

Line5ismonitored247byadedicatedteamIfthereisachangeinpressureorflowautomaticshutoffvalvesoneithersideoftheStraitscrossingwillimmediatelyshutoffflowinminutesandtrainedresponderswillbeactivatedEverytwoweekshelicopterpilotsconductanaerialinspectionflyingoverthelinelookingforsignsofaleakorspillIn2015Enbridgeconducted113integritydigsndashaprocessofunearthingsectionsofpipetoconductavisualexaminationofanyissuesreportedbyinspectiontoolsndashtothetuneof$313million

5) CarefullycraftedandpracticedresponseplansandequipmentareinplaceifeverneededWhileourinspectionreportsshowusthelineisinverygoodconditionplansequipmentandresponseteamsareinplaceintheeventofareleaseAresponseplanwhichreflectsinputfromtheUSCoastGuardandEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyhasbeenreviewedbyEnbridgersquosfederalregulatorLocalEnbridgerespondersaretrainedonithaveexercisedwithlocalemergencyofficialsandarepreparedtorespondifanincidentweretohappenInSeptember2015Enbridgecompletedafull-scaleresponsepreparednessdrillintheStraitswithfederalstateandlocalemergencyrespondersWersquoreintheprocessoffurtherenhancingourresponsecapabilitybydeployingmoreequipmenttotheareasothatwecaninitiatecontainmentandcleanupevenfasterintheeventofaleakBasedonthesefactsandtheworkthateveryEnbridgeemployeeandcontractorputsintothesafeoperationandmaintenanceofthelineitshouldremaininoperationandcontinuetodelivertheenergyweMichigandersdemandJasonManshumManagerCommunityRelationsUSPublicAffairsLiquidsOperations

28

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 31: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC ldquoPulse of the Regionrdquo Survey on Parks and Recreation

Key Findings x 73 of respondents wish there were more hiking and biking trails as well as parks that connect by hiking and biking trails x In the last 12 months 81 of respondents participated in walking hiking or running 63 visited picnic areas or open spaces 58

participated in cycling x Level of agreement with the following statements about parks and recreation in Southeast Michigan (Scale 1 to 5 1 = Strongly Disagree

and 5 = Strongly Agree) 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities are important resources in Southeast Michigan 47 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on my quality of life 46 = Parks trails outdoor rec opportunities have a positive impact on the quality of life in my community 40 = Parks and trails in my community feel safe 38 = Parks and trails in my community are easy for me to access 38 = Parks and trails in my community are well maintained 36 = Parks in my community provide the types of recreation facilities and activities that I enjoy 32 = Parks and trails are well promoted within my community 27 = There are enough parks and trails in my community

x 82 of respondents drive to the park or trail they most often visit 25 bike 21 walk

x Time (50) is the largest deterrent keeping people from visiting parks Parks are too far from home (23) Parks donrsquot provide the recreation opportunities they prefer (22)

x 72 of respondents learn more about park recreation opportunities events andor programs from the Internet 63 social media 60 word of mouth

Methodology x SEMCOG and the Metropolitan Affairs Coalition worked in conjunction with Cobalt Community Research to conduct the quarterly ldquoPulse

of the Regionrdquo survey Cobalt is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization with a mission to provide research and education in the governmental and not-for-profit sectors

x This non-random survey was accessed through the MAC and SEMCOG websites and ran in the months of April and May of 2016 x 400 surveys were completed online

29

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 32: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 1 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (1 of 2)

25

49

2

24

53

28

1

18

57

38

0 4

53

39

1 7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Boat launches or marinas Canoe kayak paddle boardlaunches

Parks near water features(lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenitiesI visit (restaurants

shopping downtownareas)

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

30

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 33: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 2 of 23

How do you feel about the amount of recreation opportunities in your community (2 of 2)

55

39

1 5

73

19

1 7

73

22

1 5

48

37

3 12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

Parks within walkingdistance of my home

Parks that connect byhiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events atparks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

31

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 34: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 3 of 23

What recreational activities have you or members of your household participated in

22

12

30

36 41

50

15

58

8

23

5

31

14

23

16

32

23

18

63

41

7

22

53

39

27

12

81

14

1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

32

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 35: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 4 of 23

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

2125

82

0 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Walking Biking Driving Publictransportation

Ride sharing None I do not useor visit parks or

trails

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

33

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 36: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 5 of 23

Level of agreement with following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

47 47 46

27

36

4038 38

32

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

tre

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

ndtr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

deth

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

san

d ac

tiviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

acce

ss

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell

prom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

Scal

e 1

to 5

(5=

Stro

ngly

Agr

ee)

34

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 37: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 6 of 23

What prevents you from visiting parks

50

3

10

22 23

6 1

20

50

10

20

30

40

50

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

What prevents you from visiting parks

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

35

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 38: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 7 of 23

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

5

38

72

63

33

14

9

21

8

60

60

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

36

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 39: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 8 of 23

Respondent Type

61

39

3

13

24

28

21

12

3

13

1

28

20

8

22

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fem

ale

Mal

e

18 to

24

year

s old

25 to

34

year

s old

35 to

44

year

s old

45 to

54

year

s old

55 to

64

year

s old

65 y

ears

old

or o

ver

Livi

ngst

on

Mac

omb

Mon

roe

Oak

land

St C

lair

Was

hten

aw

Way

ne

Oth

er

What is yourgender

What is your age Which county do you live in

Perc

enta

ge S

peci

fyin

g

37

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 40: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 9 of 23

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

25 49 2 24 53 28 1 18 57 38 0 4 53 39 1 7Female 25 46 1 27 55 25 1 20 56 40 0 4 58 35 1 7

Male 25 54 3 18 52 31 1 16 59 36 - 5 45 47 - 918 to 24 years old 18 64 - 18 73 27 - - 73 18 - 9 40 60 - -25 to 34 years old 31 48 4 17 53 24 2 22 60 38 - 2 81 15 - 435 to 44 years old 20 58 3 18 52 32 - 16 58 39 - 3 55 42 - 345 to 54 years old 25 48 1 26 57 28 1 15 57 40 1 2 46 47 1 755 to 64 years old 28 46 1 25 54 23 1 22 60 38 - 3 49 40 3 9

65 years old or over 25 39 - 36 42 30 - 28 43 39 - 18 39 39 - 22Livingston - 82 - 18 46 27 - 27 36 64 - - 27 64 - 9

Macomb 29 59 4 8 70 24 - 6 67 33 - - 48 50 - 2Monroe 67 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 67 33 - -Oakland 25 36 4 36 50 23 1 26 54 35 - 11 53 33 1 13St Clair 22 62 - 16 43 37 1 19 51 47 1 1 49 43 1 6

Washtenaw 19 52 3 26 55 36 3 7 53 47 - - 44 50 3 3Wayne 31 45 - 24 63 21 - 17 70 28 - 2 70 26 - 4

Other 19 48 - 33 29 43 - 29 38 52 - 10 29 52 - 19

Canoe kayak paddle board launches

Parks near water features (lakes rivers)

Parks near other amenities I visit (restaurants shopping

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Boat launches or marinas

38

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 41: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 10 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

I wish

ther

e w

ere

mor

e

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

Ther

e ar

e to

o m

any

Don

t kno

w

55 39 1 5 73 19 1 7 73 22 1 5 48 37 3 1258 36 1 5 71 20 0 9 70 25 0 5 55 31 2 1252 44 - 4 77 16 1 5 78 17 1 4 37 46 4 1246 46 - 9 73 27 - - 64 36 - - 46 36 9 967 33 - - 77 19 - 4 79 21 - - 49 31 4 1664 34 - 2 79 16 - 5 77 21 - 2 46 42 3 951 43 2 4 77 17 1 5 76 21 1 3 51 36 3 1056 38 - 6 72 19 - 8 72 24 - 5 43 41 - 1636 50 - 14 51 22 4 22 59 18 2 21 52 32 2 1460 30 - 10 100 - - - 82 18 - - 18 64 - 1867 33 - - 77 21 - 2 83 15 - 2 50 36 - 1467 33 - - 100 - - - 100 - - - 33 67 - -52 44 - 4 73 16 1 11 73 17 1 9 45 40 3 1246 44 1 9 62 30 1 7 60 39 1 - 44 44 3 1045 52 - 3 84 16 - - 85 15 - - 42 39 - 1864 32 1 2 74 15 1 9 75 18 - 7 63 25 4 855 30 - 15 76 14 - 10 67 29 - 5 38 33 10 19

Parks within walking distance of my home

Parks that connect by hiking or biking trails

Hiking or biking trails Programming and events at parks

39

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 42: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 11 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Base

ball

soft

ball

Bask

etba

ll

Bird

wat

chin

g

Boat

ing

Cam

ping

Cano

eing

kay

akin

g p

addl

e bo

ardi

ng

Cros

s-co

untr

y sk

iing

Cycl

ing

Disc

gol

f cou

rses

Dog

park

s

Eque

stria

n

Fish

ing

Fitn

ess e

quip

men

t sta

tions

Golf

Ice

skat

ing

hock

ey

Prog

ram

min

g (n

atur

efa

rm c

ente

rs)

Mou

ntai

n bi

king

Fiel

d sp

orts

(soc

cer

foot

ball

cric

ket)

22 12 30 36 41 50 15 58 8 23 5 31 14 23 16 32 23 1823 12 34 37 44 54 13 54 7 25 6 29 15 20 17 35 14 1721 12 24 35 38 44 19 64 10 20 3 35 12 29 15 27 37 1918 18 9 36 73 73 36 73 36 27 - 36 27 36 36 18 27 2719 9 25 40 47 47 15 57 13 28 4 28 13 21 25 30 23 2130 20 18 44 50 50 13 59 6 20 3 36 11 20 19 47 28 2726 14 38 42 38 59 14 66 6 26 5 35 16 29 16 29 28 1716 7 38 27 39 51 20 61 7 21 8 30 13 21 14 29 19 1211 2 34 19 21 28 11 30 4 17 4 17 13 19 - 17 9 68 - 25 42 58 58 42 58 8 33 25 33 17 17 17 17 58 17

19 14 31 58 42 56 12 65 6 25 - 46 14 25 21 31 35 23- - 67 - 67 67 - 67 - 33 - - - - - 33 - -

20 14 20 30 36 49 23 59 10 24 2 26 13 28 15 32 23 1830 7 40 41 42 43 6 51 5 21 9 32 11 24 17 22 24 2018 24 49 21 46 64 15 67 9 18 - 33 15 18 18 33 24 1524 14 29 35 39 49 12 56 9 24 5 26 20 22 14 44 13 1715 - 25 30 55 50 20 55 10 15 15 35 - 15 15 25 20 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months

40

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 43: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 12 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Picn

ic a

reas

she

lters

or o

pen

spac

es

Play

grou

nds

Skat

e pa

rks

Sled

ding

Swim

min

g at

bea

ches

Swim

min

g at

poo

ls

Swim

min

g at

wat

er p

arks

or s

plas

h pa

ds

Tenn

is

Wal

king

hik

ing

or r

unni

ng

Oth

er

Non

e w

e do

not

use

rec

faci

litie

s

Wal

king

Biki

ng

Driv

ing

Publ

ic tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ride

shar

ing

Non

e I

do n

ot u

se o

r visi

t par

ks o

r tra

ils

63 41 7 22 53 39 27 12 81 14 1 21 25 82 0 1 164 46 5 24 58 46 32 12 85 13 1 25 22 85 0 2 161 32 8 21 47 29 20 12 74 14 1 16 31 76 - 1 136 55 9 27 64 36 27 27 82 18 - 18 46 73 - - -72 42 4 17 66 40 26 13 81 8 - 35 23 85 - 2 -76 64 7 43 61 52 51 14 79 11 - 25 21 82 - 2 -62 34 11 18 53 39 23 11 86 16 - 17 28 77 - 2 256 31 1 18 49 35 23 12 85 10 1 15 29 88 - - 147 23 6 4 32 23 - 4 66 26 6 24 20 78 2 - 267 17 - 25 50 33 8 - 58 8 - - 25 83 - - -75 52 4 25 58 44 27 6 90 14 - 20 30 82 - - -

100 33 33 - 67 - - - 100 33 - 33 67 67 - - -57 36 6 21 48 35 24 15 75 20 4 19 21 82 - - 261 40 5 26 69 41 36 14 78 4 - 19 19 89 1 - -61 46 12 24 46 46 21 9 82 18 - 30 27 73 - 3 -63 44 8 21 46 43 30 14 87 9 - 30 32 77 - 5 165 35 5 15 55 30 25 5 85 30 - 10 29 81 - - 5

Indicate the activities you or members of your household have participated in over the past 12 months (continued)

How do you travel to the park or trail you most often visit

41

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 44: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 13 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

are

impo

rtan

t re

sour

ces i

n SE

MI

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n m

y qu

ality

of l

ife

Park

s tr

ails

out

door

rec

oppo

rtun

ities

hav

e a

posit

ive

impa

ct o

n th

e qu

ality

of l

ife in

my

com

mun

ity

Ther

e ar

e en

ough

par

ks a

nd tr

ails

in m

y co

mm

unity

Park

s in

my

com

mun

ity p

rovi

de th

e ty

pes o

f rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s and

act

iviti

es th

at I

enjo

y

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity fe

el sa

fe

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re w

ell m

aint

aine

d

Park

s and

trai

ls in

my

com

mun

ity a

re e

asy

for m

e to

ac

cess

Park

s and

trai

ls ar

e w

ell p

rom

oted

with

in m

y co

mm

unity

47 47 46 27 36 40 38 38 3247 47 47 28 36 40 39 39 3347 47 46 25 35 41 37 37 3048 48 48 31 38 45 38 36 3148 47 47 25 37 40 35 34 2749 48 48 29 38 40 39 40 3345 45 45 28 36 40 39 40 3246 46 46 25 36 39 37 38 3248 48 47 23 32 41 42 37 3446 45 44 28 38 40 33 38 2847 47 47 25 35 39 37 36 2750 50 50 20 33 43 40 37 1348 47 47 27 36 41 39 37 3347 46 46 29 39 40 42 42 3549 49 48 27 39 44 41 37 3547 46 46 24 34 38 35 38 3047 45 46 27 30 40 37 35 29

Please indicate your level of agreement to the following statements Scale 1 to 5 (1=Strongly Disagree 5=Strongly Agree)

42

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 45: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 14 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

I don

t ha

ve e

noug

h tim

e

I hav

e po

or h

ealth

or l

imite

d m

obili

ty

Entr

ance

fees

are

too

high

They

don

t pr

ovid

e th

e re

crea

tion

oppo

rtun

ities

I pr

efer

Park

s are

too

far f

rom

whe

re I

live

Im u

naw

are

of p

arks

nea

rby

Im n

ot in

tere

sted

in p

arks

Non

e of

the

abov

e

Oth

er

50 3 10 22 23 6 1 20 548 4 11 20 27 7 1 18 452 2 8 25 18 4 1 23 655 - 9 9 36 27 - 9 1844 2 18 24 48 12 2 14 459 2 9 19 18 4 - 19 754 2 10 22 17 5 1 18 547 3 8 25 27 3 1 23 429 13 7 27 11 2 - 31 -50 - - - 17 8 - 33 -51 2 8 22 31 4 2 20 433 - - - 33 - - 33 -51 6 9 23 22 4 1 17 851 1 16 19 19 7 - 26 -50 3 3 31 19 13 - 22 648 5 10 20 30 5 1 18 443 - 14 43 10 5 - 10 14

What prevents you from visiting parks

43

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 46: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 15 of 23

FemaleMale

18 to 24 years old25 to 34 years old35 to 44 years old45 to 54 years old55 to 64 years old

65 years old or overLivingston

MacombMonroeOaklandSt Clair

WashtenawWayne

Other

Which county do you live in

Overall ScorePercentage Specifying

What is your age

SEMCOGMAC Pulse of the Region on

Parks and Recreation

What is your gender

Billb

oard

s

Park

s dep

artm

ent b

roch

ures

Inte

rnet

(par

ks w

ebsit

es D

NR)

Soci

al m

edia

(Fac

eboo

k T

witt

er)

New

spap

er a

rtic

les

Radi

o

Tele

visio

n

Flye

rs in

the

mai

l

Scho

ol fl

yers

new

slett

ers

Wor

d of

mou

th

Oth

er

5 38 72 63 33 14 9 21 8 60 67 43 71 69 36 15 9 22 10 61 53 28 74 54 27 12 8 18 4 59 6

- 40 100 80 10 10 - 10 - 70 10- 28 76 72 25 15 9 17 4 62 8

6 36 77 71 19 10 6 20 17 54 96 36 75 63 37 17 9 17 10 58 67 37 66 57 35 18 11 20 2 62 24 55 60 45 62 6 9 36 - 70 28 8 83 50 8 8 - 8 - 67 82 40 71 56 35 12 15 12 6 60 6

- 67 67 100 100 - - - - 67 -3 36 78 55 33 12 8 26 8 57 66 49 62 78 37 22 5 28 10 64 46 33 82 64 42 3 6 21 9 73 99 33 70 68 31 16 10 17 8 53 65 30 75 50 5 10 10 10 5 70 5

How do you learn more about parks recreation opportunities events andor programs

44

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 47: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 16 of 23

100Female 61

Male 3918 to 24 years old 325 to 34 years old 1335 to 44 years old 2445 to 54 years old 2855 to 64 years old 21

65 years old or over 12Livingston 3

Macomb 13Monroe 1Oakland 28St Clair 20

Washtenaw 8Wayne 22

Other 5

Tota

l Per

cent

age

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

45

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 48: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

SEMCOG and MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation

2016051 2016 Cobalt Community Research (c) 17 of 23

400Female 243

Male 15718 to 24 years old 1125 to 34 years old 5335 to 44 years old 9445 to 54 years old 11155 to 64 years old 84

65 years old or over 47Livingston 12

Macomb 52Monroe 3Oakland 111St Clair 81

Washtenaw 33Wayne 87

Other 21

Tota

l Cou

nt

Demographics

Totals

Which county do you live in

What is your age

What is your gender

46

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 49: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

47

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 50: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONEMOBILE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard SMART

MCDOR Shelby Service Center City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch

Macomb County Sheriff Department

WO 1611C

Robert Hallerman PE

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671Cipparrone Contracting - Robert Hallerman PE 810-499-8009

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

Schoenherr Road Repair

Cipparrone Contracting

This project includes 10 mi of concrete pavement joint and crack repair drainage structure adjustments concrete curb and gutter on Schoenherr Road from 14 Mile Road north to 15 Mile Road Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard PE (586) 463-8671

248-424-3888

1611C

August 12 2016

Through traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

810-499-8009

June 21 2016

RLB

48

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 51: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

PROJECT NAME WP Rosso Hwy and Jefferson Ave Intersection MCDRWO 1591

TERMINI WP Rosso Hwy from2000 west of Jefferson Ave

Jefferson Ave from 2000 north of WP Rosso Hwy

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR ML Chartier Excavating Inc Telephone (586)725-8373

9195 Marine City Highway office

Fair Haven MI 48023

EMERGENCY CALLS Scott Kicinski (810) 217-5762 Cell

(586) 725-8373 Office

ML Chartier Excavating Inc

PROJECT START DATE June 27 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION September 24 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1591

REMARKS Project completed by September 24 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office ChesterfieldHarrison Twp

MCDR Nightwatch School District Anchor Bay Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

159101

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

050 miles of intersection reconstruction including the construction of a roundabout and

approaches concrete pavement curb and gutter drainage immprovements and associated

work at WP Rosso Highway and Jefferson Avenue Macomb County

49

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 52: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

PROJECT NAME Mound Road from Rinke to south of I-696 MDOT STU50458-129648A

TERMINI Mound Road from 2000 south of 10 Mile to 2000 north of 10 Mile Road

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER Bryan Santo Telephone (586) 840-3044

(586) 292-5611 cell

CONTRACTOR Florence Cement Company Telephone (586) 997-2666

12585 23 Mile Road office

Shelby Twp MI 48315

EMERGENCY CALLS Mike Randazzo (586) 747-0899 Cell

(586) 997-2666 Office

Florence Cement Company

PROJECT START DATE June 23 2016

PROJECT COMPLETION August 20 2016

MCDR WORK ORDER 1544

REMARKS Project completed by August 20 2016 Through traffic shall be maintained

with various lane closures and intermittent flagging operations occurring

DISTRIBUTION Mark Hackel County Executive Michigan State Police

Mark Deldin Dept Co Exec Detroit Edison Co

Robert Hoepfner Dir MCDR Consumers Energy Co

Walt Schell MCDR Eng Dept Board of Co Commissioners - All Districts

Leo Ciavatta Maint Macomb Co Sheriffs Dept

AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

George Melistas Macomb Daily

Sue VanSteelandt United States Post Office

John Crumm Med Star Ambulance

MCDR Traffic Dept

MCDR Sign Shop Fire Dept City of Warren

MCDR Switchboard Police Dept City of Warren

MCDR Service Center 3 Clerks Office Ciry of Warren

MCDR Nightwatch School District Warren Public Schools

Project Engineer Bryan Santo PE

154401

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

038 miles of existing pavement cold milling concrete pavement and curb and gutter repairs joint

repairs HMA resurfacing pavement markings and restoration

50

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 53: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From M-53 to 2500 East of M53

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling HeightsMCDOR Nightwatch City of WarrenMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500

feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including

adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are

encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 5 2016

RLB

51

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 54: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI From Ryan to Mound

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONEMOBILE 586-291-0060

CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTIONJohn Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PE

Bob Hoepfner Michigan State Police

Sue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison Company

Walter Schell Consumers Energy Company

Leo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All Districts

George Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency Patrol

Lana Smith Permits Macomb Daily

MCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post Office

MCDOR Sign Shop Med Star Ambulance

MCDOR Switchboard City of Sterling Heights

MCDOR Nightwatch City of Warren

Macomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1599

(586) 783-4044

1599C

September 30 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations and Lane closures Local residents are encouraged to plan for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

July 18 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

14 MILE ROAD

Di Lisio Contracting Inc

This project includes 15200 square yards of milling existing pavement 23500 square yards of concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified 500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 7550 ton of HMA Modified placement including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes Macomb County

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dino DiLisio

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

52

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 55: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

PROJECT NAME

TERMINI HAYES TO ROMEO PLANK Clintion Township

PROJECT

PROJECT ENGINEER TELEPHONE

MOBILE 586-291-0060CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY CALLS

PROJECT START DATE

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE

RCMC WORK ORDER

REMARKS

DISTRIBUTION

John Crumm Project Engineer Robert Lee Blanchard PEBob Hoepfner Michigan State PoliceSue VanSteelandt Detroit Edison CompanyWalter Schell Consumers Energy CompanyLeo Ciavatta Board of Commissioners - All DistrictsGeorge Melistas Permits AAA Michigan Emergency PatrolLana Smith Permits Macomb DailyMCDOR Traffic Dept United States Post OfficeMCDOR Sign Shop Med Star AmbulanceMCDOR Switchboard Clinton TownshipMCDOR Nightwatch Utica SchoolsMacomb County Sheriff Department SMART

WO 1596

(248) 244-3300

1596C

October 15 2016

Traffic shall be maintained with intermittent flagging operations occurring Local residents are encouraged to plan

for delays due to construction We request your cooperation and patience

June 27 2016

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET

19 MILE ROAD Clinton Township

Ajax Paving Industries

This project includes 76400 square yards of milling existing pavement 5800 square yards of

concrete pavement removalreplacement 5000 square feet of Sidewalk Ramp ADA Modified

10500 feet of curb and gutter removalreplacement and 13500 ton of HMA Modified placement

including adjustments of all necessary storm and utility manholes in Clintion Township

Robert Lee Blanchard (586) 463-8671

Dave Marshall

Macomb County Department of Roads (586) 463-8671

RLB

53

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 56: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

10 days after award May 26 2017

$107687975

No DBE participation required

1607

332

$111259740

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing concrete bridgeapproach concrete curb gutter and sidewalk cofferdam steel pile and guardrail on Quinn Road over ClintonHarrison Drain Macomb County

010

MCS 50000-129315

16-5315

As-SubmitttedBidderZ Contractors Inc $111259740Dans Excavating Inc $111499115Nashville Construction Company $111636262Toebe Construction LLC $112115251C A Hull Co Inc $116970412Anlaan Corporation $118730186

6Total Number of Bidders

54

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 57: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

10 days after award November 15 2016

$173671600

500 DBE participation required

1607

1234

$195100330

Engineer Estimate

Low Bid

Pct OverUnder Estimate

Letting Call

Project

Start Date Completion Date

Local Agreement

Letting of July 08 2016

Description

Bridge removal and replacement with prestressed concrete box beams hot mix asphalt surfacing and guardrail onLakeshore Drive over canal to Lake St Clair Macomb County

003

BRO 50006-123025

16-5296

As-SubmitttedBidderDans Excavating Inc $195100330Z Contractors Inc $198000000Toebe Construction LLC $219605979

3Total Number of Bidders

55

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 58: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April 25 2016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DtRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARD) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Farmstead System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your FarmASyst MDARO staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Farmstead System at the time of the farm inspection

The MAEAP Farmstead System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification Is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Farmstead Improvement Action Plan We understand that you Intend to manage the Farmstead as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs) Changes In your farming operation may necessitate a review of your FarmASyst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying In compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards Farms with livestock that expand must be verified through the Site Selection and Odor Control for New and Expanding Livestock Operations GAAMPs as appropriate to remain In good standing as a MAEAP verified farm

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Farmstead System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P O BOX 3007 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 wwwmlchlgangovmda bull (517) 373middot1104 bull (800) 292middot3939

56

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 59: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

middotmiddot7 ~ amp~ 7 (~ 7

Joe Kelpinski Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcamnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

57

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 60: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR

William Verellen Verellen Orchards Inc 63260 Van Dyke Road Washington Ml 48095

Dear Mr William Verellen

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

April252016

JAMIE CLOVER ADAMS DIRECTOR

On November 18 2015 Ben Tirrell from the Michigan Department of Agriculture amp Rural Development (MDARO) visited your farm located at 63255 Van Dyke Road Washington Michigan to verify your farming operation through the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) This visit was made at your request to complete the verification requirements of the MAEAP Cropping System Your MAEAP verification risk assessment was completed by Rob Malcomnson with the Macomb Conservation District

After reviewing your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan and the required components of your Crop A Syst MDARD staff has verified that you have met all of the requirements set forth by the MAEAP Cropping System at the time of the farm Inspection

The MAEAP Cropping System verification Is valid for five years from the date of the farm visit This verification is approved on the basis that you have disclosed to the best of your knowledge all requested information pertaining to your Cropping System Improvement Action Plan We understand that you intend to manage your cropping operation as reviewed and follow the applicable Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices GAAMPs) Changes in your farming operation may necessitate a review of your Crop A Syst

Verification in good standing is contingent on updates as necessary as conditions change on your farm as well as staying in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and following the identified MAEAP standards

We encourage you to display a sign proudly at your verified site as a sign of your commitment to agricultural pollution prevention and successful completion of the MAEAP Cropping System requirements

CONSTITUTION HALL bull P 0 BOX 30017 bull LANSING MICHIGAN 48909 www mtchlgan govmda bull (517) 373-1104 bull (800) 292-3939

58

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 61: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

William Verellen April252016 Page2

Congratulations on your accomplishment Your continued participation in MAEAP Is proof that the combined efforts of committed individuals organizations and agencies can foster voluntary change in the agriculture industry

If I can be of any assistance to you please dont hesitate to contact me

JFKFG

Enclosures Certificate

cc Washington Township Clerk

Sincerely

u~7C~ 1 Joe Kelpinski

Program Manager MAEAP (517) 284-5609

Rob Malcomnson MAEAP Technician Arianna Welsh Chair Macomb Conservation District Vacant Executive Director Macomb Conservation District David Flynn Chair Macomb County Board of Commissioners Lapeer Conservation District Grant Host Senator Jack Brandenburg Representative Peter J Lucido Mr Keith Creagh Director MDEQ Ms Jamie Clover Adams Director MDARD Mr James Johnson Environmental Stewardship Division Director MDARD

59

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 62: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

Enbridge to pay $36M to assess Line 5 spill riskPaul Egan Detroit Free Press 804 pm EDT July 12 2016

LANSING mdash The state has selected two contractors to assess the spill risk of the Enbridge Line 5 pipelinesunder the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac and examine alternatives for moving the oil thepipelines carry officials announced Tuesday

Enbridge Energy the owner of the pipelines will pay the full cost of the studies regardless of the findings theMichigan Agency for Energy and Attorney General Bill Schuette said in news releases

Schuette said Enbridge has agreed put close to $36 million into an escrow fund to pay for the studiesoverseen by the state

ldquoThis announcement ensures the state will get the information it needs to best protect the Great Lakes and the citizens of Michiganrdquo said Valerie Braderexecutive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy ldquoMoreover these experts who will work solely for the people of Michigan will come at no cost tothe staterdquo

But the environmental coalition Oil amp Water Dont Mix criticized the agreement saying it will give Enbridge access to the final report ahead of the public

Dynamic Risk Assessment Systems headquartered in Calgary Alberta Canada was selected to evaluate the current pipelines and the alternatives tothem including the potential impacts of those alternatives the news release said

Det Norske Veritas (USA) is to conduct an independent risk analysis determining the potential financial risk of a worstshycase spill and what resourceswould be necessary to clean up and pay for damages from such a spill

There is growing concern about the risk of a leak from the pipelines under the Straits of Mackinac and what damage such a spill could do to the GreatLakes tourism and other aspects of Michigans economy

Last week groups demonstrated outside Schuettes home in Midland demanding an immediate shutdown of the pipelines

Enbridge insists the pipelines which were built in 1953 and carry nearly 23 million gallons of oil a day are safe Line 5 is a 30shyinch pipeline from SuperiorWis to Sarnia Ontario which splits into two 20shyinch lines under the straits

But others say the risk is too great given the age of the pipelines the damage a spill would do and Enbridges track record which includes a 2010pipeline burst and spill of more than 1 million gallons of heavy tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed

The studies expected to be completed in the summer of 2017 are intended to help state officials make decisions about the future of the pipelines

Enbridge spokesman Ryan Duffy said the company is pleased the state selected independent companies that understand energy infrastructure and theimportant role pipelines play in delivering energy as well as protecting the environment

We continuously monitor and inspect Line 5 and while its not perfect we know through our very rigorous inspection process that the line is in very goodcondition Duffy said We believe this additional analysis will reach the same conclusion

But environmentalists expressed concern that Enbridge will have at least five days to study the report before it is made public

Todayrsquos announced deal with Enbridge not only gives Enbridge a big leg up to publicly shoot down recommendations they donrsquot like it also providesthem an opportunity to lobby for changes in the report while the public is kept in the darkrdquo said David Holtz chair of the Michigan chapter of the SierraClub which is part of the Oil amp Water Dont Mix coalition

ldquoItrsquos extremely disappointing that the governor and attorney general are continuing to grant concessions to Enbridge that call into question whether theyare truly committed to ending the threat of a catastrophic oil spill in the Great Lakesrdquo

Related Schuettes Midland home targeted in Line 5 protest (storynewspolitics20160706schuettesshymidlandshyhomeshyattackedshymobshylineshy5shyprotest86778244)

(Photo Enbridge)

60

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 63: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

Seven proposals were submitted mdash three for the alternatives analysis and four for the risk analysis officials said The proposals were assessed by anintershyagency technical review team from the Michigan Agency for Energy Schuettes office the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality theMichigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Public Service Commission

ldquoThis agreement ensures that Michiganders can be certain these studies were prepared by experts without a preshyexisting agenda or desired outcomerdquosaid DEQ Director Keith Creagh ldquoWe will have the resources and the independence we need to do this rightrdquo

The selection of the contractors follows recommendations that were made by a technical review team composed of staff from those governmentagencies The Pipeline Safety Advisory Board and members of the public also provided input to the agencies in the development of the Requests forInformation (RFIs) that were issued on Feb 23

The studies were developed in response to recommendations from the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report coshychaired by Schuette releasedin July 2015

Contact Paul Egan 517shy372shy8660 or peganfreepresscom Follow him on Twitter paulegan4

Read or Share this story httponfreepcom29L6QrG

61

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project
Page 64: Macomb County Board of Commissionerscircuitcourt.macombgov.org/sites/default/files...m. Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Cropping System (page 58) Verification:

First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACEProject

Heller Machine Tools Is First Michigan Manufacturer to Use PACE Financing

On June 30 2016 Heller Machine Tools became the first manufacturing company in Michigan to use PACEfinancing to pay for a deep energy retrofit Heller is working with Levin Energy Partners ABM and Petros PACEFinance a national PACE lender to replace outdated and inefficient equipment and make the company even morecompetitive and profitable The facility upgrade will be the largest PACE financed project in Michigan to date oncecompleted helping the international manufacturing company pay for $978607 of energy saving improvements

Hellerrsquos project which is set to be completed in the fall of 2016 involves networked building controlscomprehensive lighting replacement server room cooling partial roof replacement HVAC and compressed airupgrades The work will be done by ABM an international provider of facility services for over 100 years Theseimprovements will save the company $16 million over fifteen years ndash with a positive cash flow of $368000 net ofall closing costs and PACE payments With PACE Heller looks not only to save money and eliminate energywaste but also have a positive and lasting impact on the environment

To learn more about this project via our most recent case study A Snapshot of Michigans Biggest PACE Project Yet

PACE District City of TroyProperty Owner Heller Machine ToolsContractor ABMProject Cost $978067Total Money Saved $16 MillionNet Positive Cash Flow $368000Energy Conservation MeasuresEnergy Reduction 460029 kWh less electricity and 658000000 therms less natural gasAnnual Carbon Emission Reductions 3575 metric tons

Thatrsquos like eliminating 857453 miles driven by average passenger cars each year

62

  • PMC Monthly Report July
  • Agenda Item-PLN Bud Amdmt Urban-Comm Forestry
  • FarmBill_StClairMacomb 2016
  • Enbridge Response to Resolution Letter June 2016
  • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Pulse of the Region Survey on Parks and Recreation RESULTS
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Community Study Results
    • (2016051) SEMCOG-MAC Final Results
      • Charts
      • Cross tabulations
      • Demographics_Percentage
      • Demographics_Count
      • Comments - Other activities
      • Comments - Prevents you from vi
      • Comments - Learn more
          • 07-08-16_2016PAVEPRES Conc
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Schoenherr Rd From 14 to 15 Mile
          • 159101 info sheet
          • 154401 info sheet
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 14 Mile 1599 2
          • PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET 19 Mile Clinton TWP 1596
          • 07-08-16 Quinn_BidResults
          • 07-08-16 SouthLakeshore_BidResults
          • William Verellen Farmstead
          • William Verellen Cropping
          • Enbridge to pay $35 Million for Study
          • First Manufacturer in Michigan Closes $1 Million PACE Project