MACHINE VISION GROUP Head-tracking virtual 3-D display for mobile devices Miguel Bordallo López, Jari Hannuksela, Olli Silvén* and Lixin Fan**, * University

MACHINE VISION GROUP

Head-tracking virtual 3-D display for mobile devices

Miguel Bordallo López*, Jari Hannuksela*, Olli Silvén* and Lixin Fan**,

* University of Oulu, Finland** Nokia Research Center, Tampere, Finland


Contents

IntroductionHead-tracking 3D virtual display

• Interaction design• Face-tracking for mobile devices• Mobile device’s constrains

• Field of view• Energy efficiency

ImplementationLatency considerationsPerformanceSummary


Introduction3D virtual displays

Calculate the relative position of the user respect to the screen

Calculate the angle of the user’s point of view

Render an image according to the point of view

Result is a Virtual Window: - Shows realistic 3D objects - Based on parallax effect* Video from Johnny Lee (Wiimote head tracking project)

The position information is used to render the 3D UI/content as if the user watched it from different angles. The technology enable users to watch the content from different angles and become more immersed.


IntroductionMobile 3D virtual displays

• Mobile head-coupled display can take advantage of the small size• Movement of either user or device

• Mobile Devices have cameras and sensors integrated• No need for external periferics

• Can increase UI functionalities• New applications and concepts• Realistic 3D objects can be rendered and perceived

• New interaction methods can be developed• We know what the user looks at and we can use that

information


Demo


Head-tracking mobile virtual 3D display

A simple use case


Interaction design


• Head-coupled displays require robust and fast face-tracking

• Based on multiscale LBP, Cascade classifier and AdaBoost

• Excellent results in face recognition and authentication, face detection, facial expression recognition, gender classification

IntroductionMobile face-tracking


IntroductionEvaluating the distance to the screen

• Essential to compute de relative angle • Ground truth determined With Kinect• Two methods evaluated:• Face size obtained with face tracking

• Flickering between frames• No extra computations needed• Good accuracy

• Motion estimation library: • Harris corners + BLUE• Computes changes of scale between frames• Presents about 10% more accuracy• Less flickering between frames• Needs extra computations:

• Introduces latency, decreases framerate• Worse input sequence for tracking• More differences between frames


Mobile constrainsField of view

• Front Camera is on the device’s corner and

not pointing to the user:

• Reduced field of view (<45dg)• Assymmetric FoV• Even more reduced effective FoV• Considerable minimum

distance to the screen

• User often outside of the point of view

• Tracking sometimes lost • Need to show viewfinder on the

screen


Mobile constrainsField of view

• Implemented solution: Wide angle lens

• Dramatically increases the effective field of view (<160dg)

• Requires calibrated lens• Requires de-warping routine

• Implemented with lookup tables

• Problems when several faces are on the field of view


Mobile constrainsEnergy efficiency

Practical challenge of camera-based UI is to have an always active camera

Lower framerate -> High UI starting latenciesHigher framerate -> Small energy-efficiency

Application processor (even in mobile) is power hungry

Specific processors closer to the sensors are needed

Current devices include HW-codecs and GPUs:Better energy efficiency due to small EPI

Mobile GPU already programable:OpenGL ESOpenCL Embeded Porfile


Energy efficiencyGPU-accelerated face-tracking

Computational and energy costs per VGA frame of feature extraction

GPU can be treated as an independent entityCan be use concurrently with CPU

Use of GPU for feature extraction (format conversion + multiscaling + LBP)Mobile GPUs still not very efficient for certain tasks


Implementation

• Demo platform: N900 (Qt + Gstreamer + openGL ES)

• Based on face-tracking external library

• Implementation details:

• Input image resolution : 320x240

• Frame rate: 16-20 fps.

• Base latency: 90-100 ms.

• Accepted field of view: < 45dg hori. & < 35dg vert.

• User’s distance range: 25 - 300 cm.


ImplementationSimple block diagram


ImplementationTask distribution



Camera module Application ProcessorCPU

Graphics ProcessorGPU

TouchscreenDisplay



Camera module

Application Processor

Graphics Processor

Touchscreen


Mobile constrainsLatency

• User interface latency is a critical issue• Latency > 100ms. Very disturbing• Realistic 3D rendering even more sensitive • Not realistic if it happened a while ago !!!


Mobile constrainsLatency hiding

A possible solution: Latency hiding

Requires good knowledge of the system’s timing

Predict the current position based on motion vector


Performance

Demo platform: Nokia N900 ARM cortex A8, 600 MHz + PowerVR535 GPU

Comparison platform: Nokia N9ARM cortex A8, 1 GHz + PowerVR535 GPU


Remaining problems

• Face-tracking based 3D User Interfaces provide support for new concepts• Face tracking can be offered as a platform level

• Current mobile platforms still present several shortcomings• Energy efficiency compromises battery life• Camera not designed for UI purposes• Single camera implies difficult 3D context recognition


Thank you

Any question?


LBP fragment shader implementation

• Access the image via texture lookup• Fetch the selected picture pixel• Fetch the neighbours values• Compute binary vector• Multiply by weighting factor

• Uses OpenGL ES interface• Two versions:

– Version 1: calculates LBP map in one grayscale channel

– Version 2: calculates 4 LBP maps in RGBA channels


Preprocessing

Create quad

Divide texture &Convert to grayscale

Render each piecein one channel


GPU assisted face analysis process

Documents

MACHINE VISION GROUP Head-tracking virtual 3-D display for mobile devices Miguel Bordallo López*, Jari Hannuksela*, Olli Silvén* and Lixin Fan**, * University

MACHINE VISION GROUP Head-tracking virtual 3-D display for mobile devices Miguel Bordallo López, Jari Hannuksela, Olli Silvén* and Lixin Fan**, * University