MACE Formats 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    1/46

    Training Topic Vs Name

    S.no Name of Perso Designation Level 5s TS Positive att 7QC Tools

    1 Ram oper oper Y N Y Y2 Shyam mgr top N Y Y Y

    3 Ghanshyam supp. middle Y Y Y Y

    4 Sonu oper oper Y Y N N

    5 monu mgr top Y Y N N

    6 Bhavesh mgr top N Y N N

    7 Pintu engg middle N Y N N

    8 Tinku engg middle Y Y N N

    9 ratiram mgr top Y N N N

    10 rajaram am top Y N Y Y11 ratanlal am top Y N Y Y

    12 joshi dm top N Y Y Y

    13 pk dm top N Y N Y

    14 rajeev oper oper N Y N N

    15 mandal oper oper N Y Y Y

    16 miglani supp. middle N Y Y Y

    17 parveen supp. middle N N Y Y

    18 jangra ae middle N N N Y

    19 vikasbh oper oper Y N Y Y

    20 vabhav engg middle Y Y N N

    21 anil engg middle Y Y Y N

    22 ajit am top Y Y N Y

    23 kky dm top Y Y Y Y

    24 ashok am top Y Y N Y

    25 teeka oper oper Y N Y N

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    2/46

    Kaizan

    Y

    N

    Y

    Y

    Y

    N

    N

    Y

    YY

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    Y

    Y

    N

    N

    N

    Y

    Y

    Y

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    3/46

    AA A B CMkt

    gEngg Dev

    2 Pre-Feasibility O O O O O

    5 Cost Estimation O O O O O

    10 BOM O O O O

    17 Process FMEA O O O O O O O

    18 Productivity Goals O O O O O

    Work Instruction for Resposibility(APQP)

    Purpose : To define the rank of new product for development & activities & responsibiliti

    process change of existing items.

    Scope : This WI is applicable for development of new product,Engg change and any Pr

    Method : Description,Rank of Development and responsibility is defined as below

    S.No Description

    Development Respo

    1 Reciept of drawing along with spec drg/ref.sample O O O O

    3 Clarification from customer for incomplete info O O O O O O

    4 Technical feasibility. O O O O O

    6 Reciept of LOI from customer O O O O O

    7 Preparation of PDF O O O O

    8 Preparation of Timing Chart O O O O O

    9 Process Flow Chart O O O O

    11 Passed History Study O O O

    12 Component Drawing O O O O

    13 Drawing Review O O O O

    14 Review of Process Flow chart O O O

    15 Listing of special Characteristics O O O O O

    16Evaluation of Regulatory/Statutory requirements,

    environmental Health & Safety IssuesO O O O

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    4/46

    22 Tool Manufacturing O O O O

    23 Gauge Testing Equipment O O O O

    24 Sourcing Raw Material/BOPs O O O O O25 Sample Trial Run O O O O O O

    26 Follow-Up Results during Product Development O O O O O

    27 Review with Customer O O O O

    28 Layout Plan O O

    29 Component Procurement O O O O O

    30 Ppk Study Plan O O O O

    31 Operator Process Instruction O O O O

    32 Logistic Study O O O O

    33 Packaging Specifications O34 Pre-Launch control Plan O O

    35 MSA Plan O O O O

    36 Production Trail Run,Pilot Lot O O O O O

    37 Process Product Validation O O O O O

    38 Process Capability Evaluation O O O O O

    39 MSA study O O O O

    40 PPAP O O O

    41 Customer Approval O O O O O

    43 Production control Plan O O O O O

    44 Production Source Approval O O O

    Rank

    AA

    Legend

    42 Feedback Analysis & Corrective Action O O O O O O

    That whenever the Environment (Containing comtaminants like Metallic Chips,Dust) or

    and the safety contents

    Development Rank:

    Details

    BThat Whenever there happens to be a Minor Deviation in the Component produced so f

    CThat whenever there happens to be extremely minor change in details related to the co

    becomes non mandatory(It becomes more of checks in regard to monitoring of the poin

    Absolutely new component : no Experience of Production so farA That the part happens to be similar to what had been produced so far but there happen

    material,Machining Methodology,In the structure or in the function.

    A component similar to the component produced so far but there happens to be

    That whenever there happens to be changed in production site

    That whenever the place/country of development happens to be different from the place

    Review Required/Important from discussion

    (Blank)

    LEGENDS:

    For Development Rank

    Definition

    Point to be Implemented

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    5/46

    Legend Definition

    For Responsibility

    Prime Responsibility

    Co-Responsibility

    00' New Issue

    Rev.No. Description

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    6/46

    QA Prod Matls

    O

    O

    Document No.

    es for product development , Engg change and any

    cess change of existing items.

    nsibility

    RemarksDocument

    Reference

    O O

    O

    O

    O

    O

    O

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    7/46

    O O O

    O O

    OO O

    O

    O

    O

    O O

    O O

    O O O

    O

    O O

    O

    O

    O

    O

    lse the degree of Moisture,Temperature,Pressure

    O O O

    ar(To implement only for inspection of initial product)

    ponent ,so much so that even the inspection

    s of variation in regard to 4M

    to be large scale difference in raw

    /country of production

    oint of view

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    8/46

    19/8/2004

    Date

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    9/46

    Advanced Product Quality Planning DateStatus Report Review No.:

    Diamond Point:

    Supplier Program

    Location Model Year

    Supplier Code Lead Part No.Risk Assessment Part Name

    New: Site X Technology Process Eng. Level

    Other Risks User Plant(s)

    Team Members Company/Title E-Mail Phone/Fax

    Build Level IPD Into Plant Status GYR Quantity Concurred P.I.S.T. P.I.P.C.

    Date (MRD) Present History No. SC's No. CC's % %

    G G

    1Risks: 1 = No Risk 3 = medium Risk (PSW part submission date can still be achieved - Special effort necessary) 5 = high (PSW part submission date endangered)

    APQP Elements GYR Risk Program Supplier Closed Resp. Remarks or

    Status Evaluation Need Timing Date Engineer Assistance Required

    Present History per Element Date Date Initials

    1 Customer Input Requirements G G 4/15/2005 4/13/2005 4/14/2005 OW2 Agreed GQA G Y 4/15/2005 4/13/2005 TF

    3 Product Feasibility G G 4/15/2005 4/13/2005 4/14/2005 AZ

    4 Sourcing Decision G G 4/15/2005 4/13/2005 4/14/2005 OW

    5 Change Management G G 5/20/2005 5/18/2005 AZ

    6 Environmental-Management/ IMDS/ ELV G G 6/3/2005 6/1/2005 5/22/2005 TF

    7 Prototype Build Control Plan G G 5/20/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 TF

    8 Design Verification Plan G G 4/29/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 AZ

    9* Facilities, Tools, Gauges G G 6/10/2005 6/8/2005 AZ

    10* Design FMEA R R 5/13/2005 5/11/2005 AZ11* DFMA @ Customer level G G 5/20/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 AZ

    12* Drawings and Specifications (Design Freeze) G G 5/20/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 AZ

    13 Information about Subcontractors G G 4/22/2005 4/20/2005 4/20/2005 OW

    14* Logistic Concept G G 4/29/2005 4/27/2005 4/28/2005 UE

    15* Packaging Specification (Serial & Spare Parts) G G 5/20/2005 5/18/2005 5/2/2005 UE

    16* Design Validation @ Supplier Level G G 5/13/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 AZ

    17* Design Validation @ Customer Level G G 5/20/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 AZ

    18* Measurement Syst. Analysis/ Measuring Agreem. G G 5/20/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 TF

    19 Definition of Team for Serial Support G G 6/3/2005 6/1/2005 6/1/2005 OW

    20 Definition of Quality Reporting G G 6/3/2005 6/1/2005 6/1/2005 TF

    21 Prelaunch Control Plan G G 4/29/2005 4/27/2005 4/27/2005 TF

    1

    1

    1

    3 In negociation

    2 Points to be cleared

    1

    1 1 Gauge may be unnecessary

    1

    1

    1

    1

    5 see below1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    10/46

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    11/46

    Part Name:

    Part Number

    Clause No.1.3

    Implementati

    on date

    TGR / TGW (PDCA Format)

    Defect / Problem Incharge Action Taken Target Date

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    12/46

    Status

    1st 2nd 3rd OK/NG

    Effectiveness of Checking

    Remarks

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    13/46

    Part Name __________________________________ Model _______________ Station _________________

    Part Number________________________________ Customer _____________________________________________

    Start date of Initial Supply Control ________________________________________________________________________

    End Date of Initial Supply Control ________________________________________________________________________

    Remarks.

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Incharge ( Product Development)

    Extended upto (If required) ______________________________________________________________________________

    Reason for Extention _________________________________________________________________________________

    Incharge ( Product Development)

    INTIAL SUPPLY CONTROL

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    14/46

    Clause No.2.7

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    15/46

    ________

    ________

    _________

    _________

    __________

    __________

    __________

    _________

    ___________

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    16/46

    Implemented Not Implemented

    1 Is the assembly line, stage under "ICP" is identified

    clearly --- "Under Initial Control Period" ?

    YES

    2 Are additional check points given in Supervisor

    check sheet for " ICP" ?

    YES

    3 Are additional check points given in Operator check

    sheet for " ICP" ?

    YES

    4 Are additional points in check sheet / WI for ICPclearly highlighted or is special identification of these

    additional points done ( Star mark etc) ?

    YES

    5 Are the Operators and respective Initial Flow Incharge

    aware of their / his responsibilities?

    YES

    6 Is the timing plan made detailing all the activities ? YES

    7 Is follow up of respective activities being done as per

    Timing Plan and is review status being updated in

    Timing Plan and are remarks for any delay or

    rescheduling recorded ?

    YES

    8 Is PDCA Approach followed for problem solving

    during ICP ? ( Rejection Analysis , rejection trend , To

    fillup the CM Sheet , to decide the actions and

    YES

    9 Is Process FMEA carried out ? YES

    10 Is cut off limit of RPN decided for taking actions on

    the basis of FMEA ?

    YES

    11 Is evaluation of Process capability done ?( Once in 3 months)

    YES

    12 Is supplier audit planned and is carried out at decided

    frequency?

    YES

    13 Are operators being trained for the work they are

    performing ? ( training record / training plan / Skill

    matrix)

    YES

    14 Are Managers and Supervisors clear about their

    added responsibilities ?

    YES

    15 Is problem solving technique used for the faced

    problems ( inhouse , customer line rejection)

    ( See Counter Measure sheet History of possible

    YES

    Status

    CHECK SHEET FOR " INITIAL CONTROL PHASE"

    1) NAME OF THE PRODUCT UNDER " Production Preparation Phase" --- WASHER ASSY. WINDSHIELD (YC-5)

    2) NAME OF THE CUSTOMER :--- MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED

    3) PART NUMBER :- 38400M68K00/K10

    4) DATE OF STARTING OF " ICP" :-

    5) TERMINATION DATE OF " ICP" ( Period for Initial Control ) :-

    6) PROJECT LEADER / CFT LEADER :-

    S No Points to be Implemented / Reviewed

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    17/46

    17 Are identification tags used to identify initial products

    from the changed process and is the identification

    controlled through out the subsequent supplier

    process till despatch ?

    18 Is Initial product supplied to customer with necessary

    inspection reports and with FPP tag ?

    19 Are all the instruments calibrated ?

    20 Are all the fixtures validated ? ( Is Drawing available?

    )

    21 Is MSA study carried out ?

    22 Are Breakdown trend maintained and is action plan

    made to reduce breakdown ?

    YES

    Signature of Initial Flow Incharge :-

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    18/46

    Responsibility /Remarks

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    19/46

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    20/46

    Implemented

    1 Are all the problems occuring before SOP are

    resolved ans a recheck done to confirm that they

    remain solved ?

    2 Is any new problem arising in Initial Control Period

    resolved ? ( Verify the concerned records)

    3 Is cross verification of all the additional check

    points given in Supervisor check / Operator check

    sheet and Work Instructions sheet for " ICP" done ?Is

    there still a need for these additional points ?

    Are these documents revised before terminating the

    ICP?

    4 Is Cpk > 1.67 ( If not , is action decided to increase

    the Cpk value? ) ( Verify from the SPC records)

    5 Is ICP at supplier's end over. Are all the incomingparts related to ICP product OK ?

    6 Are Acceptance Standard revised ( Remove the extra

    check points -- if there is no quality issue during ICP )

    7 Is History of all the problem faced during ICP

    maintained ( CM , rejection trends , History of

    possible reasons etc)

    8 Are Control Plan , FMEA rocess Flow Diagram ,Work Instructions. Operator and Supervisor Check

    sheets have been updated ( Highlight the marks

    related to Customer Complaint , Customer Line

    rejection or related to Critical Process)

    9 Is the skill matrix of Operators and their Competency

    records updated ?

    10 Are the necessary Limit samples , Sketches available

    on all the required stages as per Control Plan

    11 Are all the jigs and fixtures suitable for their respective

    CHECK SHEET FOR " TERMINATION OF INITIAL

    1) NAME OF THE PRODUCT UNDER " Production Preparation Phase" ---

    2) NAME OF THE CUSTOMER :---

    3) PART NUMBER :-

    4) DATE OF STARTING OF " ICP" :-

    5) TERMINATION DATE OF " ICP" :-

    6) PROJECT LEADER / CFT LEADER :-

    S No Points to be Implemented / Reviewed St

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    21/46

    12 Are all the jigs and fixtures validated at regular

    interval ?

    13 Is History sheet of all the machines maintained ?14 Is time study carried out ? Are action taken for line

    balancing ?

    15 Is OEE carried out for this line ? Is the line capable of

    meeting Customers requirements ?

    16 Is MSA records updated as per Control Plan?

    17 Is there any repeated Breakdown ?

    18 Are all the machines suitable for their respective

    usage ?

    19 Are Production trial and Mass Production trial records

    available ? ( Verify the records)

    Signature of CFT Members :-

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    22/46

    Not Implemented

    CONTROL PHASE"

    atus Responsibility /Remarks

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    23/46

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    24/46

    Part Number _____________________ Part Name _

    Control duration : From ___________________ To ________

    Extension (if any) _________________________________

    Reason of extension _________________________________

    Details of initial supply control :

    New component (Model) ___________________________

    Design change (ECN number) ______________________

    Process change :

    Process parameter change Su

    Tool/Die/Machine/Equipment change O

    Layout change Re

    S.No. Control Item UOM

    Specificat

    ion

    R

    c

    1 Customer complaints numbers 0

    2 Inprocess rejection ppm 30

    3 Incoming rejection ppm 30

    4 Cpk value 1.67

    5

    Result of c'measure taken

    aginst problems during

    production preparation

    current vs

    previous Effective

    6

    Result of c'measure taken

    aginst problems during initial

    supply control

    current vs

    previous Effective

    7 Any other

    Result of Initial Supply Control NG

    Initial control checks can be terminated NO

    Initial supply control period extended by da

    Ap

    C

    INITIAL SUPPLY CONTROL SIGN O

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    25/46

    __________________

    __________________

    _________________

    pplier change

    erator change

    located plant

    esult at end of

    ontrol duration Remarks

    OK

    YES

    ys

    proved by (Devp Incharge)

    FF

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    26/46

    Part Name

    Part Number

    Reason of IPP

    Date of Production

    Inspected by

    Signature

    Clause No.

    IPP Tags

    Initial Part Product Tag

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    27/46

    3.2

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    28/46

    Sect ion / Department

    List of Activities performed by Operator 1

    Are the operator verification sheets completed daily by all shifts ?

    Are the tagging procedures being followed?

    Are the Non conforming rejection are located in the specified area.

    Procedure for carrying activities done as per the Operation standard

    Clause No.11

    If Rating < 03, Operator counselling required, Training to be give

    OBSERVANCE OF OPERATOR

    Operator Name

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    29/46

    2 3 4 5

    Rating Criteria

    to Operator.

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    30/46

    SI NO.DATE OF

    OCCURRENCEPART NAME

    MODEL/

    CUSTOMERDEFECT REPEAT NO

    PLAN

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    31/46

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    32/46

    ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS ACTION TO BE TAKENTAR

    DATE

    ACTUAL

    CLOSURE

    DATE

    RESP.

    CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS VERIFICATION CHECKSHEET

    DO

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    33/46

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    34/46

    1 2 3 4 5 6 FMEACONTRO

    L PLAN

    INSPECTI

    ON STD

    WORK

    INSTRUCTIO

    NS

    QUALITY

    ALERT

    FOLLOW UP / DATESHorizontal

    Deployme

    nt

    INSTITUTIONALISE THE PROBLEM WITH UPDA

    CHECK ACT

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    35/46

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    36/46

    LESSON

    LEARNTREMARKS

    ION OF FOLLOWINGS

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    37/46

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    38/46

    1 6

    2 7

    3 8

    4 9

    5 10

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    End Point

    Unloading of Raw MaterialLoading of Finish

    Goods

    PART NAME:-

    PART NO:-

    MODEL:-

    Team Menber

    DEFECT POSSIBILITIES

    Orientation

    Proper Seating

    Damage

    Missing

    Starting Point

    Safety

    Identification

    Operation Missing

    Reverse

    Double

    Wrong parts (different parts)

    Date:-

    Process Precision Check

    OBSERVATIONSSl.No PROCESS STEPSDefect Possibilities

    STATUSACTION RESPONSIBILITYTARGET

    DATE

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    39/46

    Clause No 13

    MAKE A PLAN FOR PRECISION PRECISION

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    40/46

    S.NOPARAMETER TO

    CHECK1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 REMARKS

    X

    CHECKED BY

    OK AFTER CORRECTION APPROVED BY

    VERIFIED BY

    OKLEGAND NG

    DAILY INSPECTION OF INSTRUMENT / EQUIPMENT / MACHINE

    MONTH:-

    INSTRUMENT / EQUIPMENT / MACHINE NAME:-

    CONTROL NO:-

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    41/46

    QA Production

    Date Date

    Time Time

    Note: Retension period :

    In Charge Prod. In Charge QA

    Part Name

    Part No

    Model

    QUALITY ALERT / FLASH NOTE

    (Customer / In-house / Warranty / Supplier)

    DEFECTS:-

    PHOTO/SKETCH:-

    ACTION REQUIRED:-

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    42/46

    Apr. May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

    P

    A

    P

    A

    P

    A

    P

    AP

    A

    P

    A

    P

    A

    P

    A

    P

    A

    S.No Topic Date

    Month

    YEAR Prepared By Verified By Approve

    HigherMgt.

    MiddleMg

    t

    Operatorlevel

    ANNUAL TRAINING PLAN Vs ACHIEVEMENTNo. of

    Persons

    Faculit

    yDurationTopicCat.

    Next Date Sign.

    Sign.

    Total

    Date

    Reasion for Delay

    Plan/

    Actu

    al

    DepartmentFacilities

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    43/46

    Mar

    By

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    44/46

    Parameter

    No

    Pr.

    No

    1 6

    2 7

    3 8

    4 9

    5 10

    Parameter

    No1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    7

    9

    10

    Opr. Sign.

    Sup. Sign.

    LEGAND X

    Date Sketch (if any)Abnormality Action Taken Impl. Date Resp.

    Prepared By Approved By

    DAILY STARTUP CHECK SHEET(for Equipment/ Machine/ Instrument etc)

    Name:- No:- Deptt./Section:- Last Call/ Maint. Date:- Call/ Maint. Due Date:- Resp.:-

    Month

    Parameter Specification Check Method Freq.Parameter Specification Check Method Freq.

    OK AFTER CORRECTION APPROVED BYOK NG

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    45/46

    S.No Parameter to Check 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    7

    9

    10

    Opr. Sign.

    Sup. Sign.

    LEGAND X

    Date

    OK NG

    Abnormality Action Taken Impl. Date Resp.

    OK AFTER CORRECTION APPROVED BY

    Sketch (if any)

    DAILY STARTUP CHECK SHEET(for Equipment/ Machine/ Instrument etc)

    Deptt./Section:- Resp.:-Control No:-Inst/Equi.Name:-

  • 7/30/2019 MACE Formats 1

    46/46

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Remarks

    4 7

    TOPIC

    S.No EMP.NO PHOTO EMP.NAMECan work under supervision

    Plan

    Can handle independently

    Actual

    Can train other

    SKILL MATRIX

    Minium no.of person req. for skill level

    Minium no.of person req. for skill level

    Minium no.of person req. for skill level

    Revised on:

    De

    cember

    Ja

    nuary

    Fe

    bruary

    M

    arch

    Basic Knowledge only

    Minium no.of person req. for skill level

    Year

    April

    May

    June

    July

    A

    ugust

    September

    O

    ctober

    No

    vember

    1 A

    2 B

    3 C

    DATE REASION FOR DELAY

    4 D

    NEW DATENAME

    SIGN.

    DATE