22
REDD: Consultants, cost curves and safeguards UN Climate Change Conference Bonn, 7 June 2011

M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

REDD: Consultants, cost curves and safeguardsUN Climate Change ConferenceBonn, 7 June 2011

Page 2: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

REDD+Reducing emissions from deforestation.

Page 3: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey & CompanyIncrease in deforestation and carbon emissions?

Page 4: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

METHOD

Page 5: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

METHOD

Page 6: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

METHOD

Independent discussion of McKinsey cost curveProfessor Paul Ekins, Energy Institute, University of London

Greenpeace analysis of REDD-related documentsGuyanaPapua New GuineaDemocratic Republic of the CongoIndonesia

Page 7: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

KEY FINDINGS

Page 8: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey’s advice does not lead to a cessation of deforestation or forest degradation.

Page 9: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey’s cost curve is fundamentally flawedand its rationale is closed to scrutiny.

Page 10: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey’s approach allows rainforest nations to claim REDD+ funding for preventing destruction that was unlikely to have ever happened.

Page 11: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey-advised studies barely acknowledge governance issues within rainforest nations.

Page 12: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey-inspired plans fail to address major drivers of deforestation; they reward the industries that cause it.

Page 13: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey-advised studies play down the environmental impact of industrial logging and plantations; they exaggerate the impact of smallholders and farmers.

Page 14: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey’s advice has informed national plans which have then been criticised by funding institutions and are unfit for purpose.

Page 15: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

RECOMMENDATIONS

McKinsey: publish the data, assumptions and analysis behind its cost curve methodology.

McKinsey: commit to reviewing and revising its methodology.

McKinsey: reject logging as a climate mitigation measure.

Page 16: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

RECOMMENDATIONS

McKinsey: publish the data, assumptions and analysis behind its cost curve methodology.

McKinsey: commit to reviewing and revising its methodology.

McKinsey: reject logging as a climate mitigation measure.

Page 17: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

RECOMMENDATIONS

McKinsey: publish the data, assumptions and analysis behind its cost curve methodology.

McKinsey: commit to reviewing and revising its methodology.

McKinsey: reject logging as a climate mitigation measure.

Page 18: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

www.greenpeace.org.uk

Page 19: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

McKinsey’s bad influence on national plans to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation.

Page 20: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter
Page 21: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter
Page 22: M kpresentation 07-06-11-ritter

RECOMMENDATIONS

McKinsey: publish the data, assumptions and analysis behind its cost curve methodology.

McKinsey: commit to reviewing and revising its methodology.

McKinsey: reject logging as a climate mitigation measure.