Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
National Fire Protection Association
1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471
Phone: 617-770-3000 • Fax: 617-770-0700 • www.nfpa.org
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Technical Committee on Mass Evacuation and Sheltering
FROM: Yvonne Smith, Project Administrator
DATE: July 1, 2015
SUBJECT: NFPA 1616 First Draft TC Ballot Circulation (F2016)
The June 26, 2015 date for receipt of the NFPA 1616 First Draft ballot has ended.
The preliminary First Draft ballot results are shown on the attached report.
29 Members Eligible to Vote
3 Ballots Not Returned (Maloney, Witkowski, Voss)
In accordance with the NFPA Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards,
attached are reasons for negative votes for review so you may change your ballot if you wish.
Abstentions and affirmative comments are also included. Ballots received from alternate members
are not included unless the ballot from the principal member was not received.
If you wish to change your vote, the change must be received at NFPA on or Wednesday, July 8,
2015 at 11:59 p.m. Members who have not returned a ballot may do so now. Such changes
should be submitted through the NFPA Vote.net Ballot Site.
The return of ballots is required by the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA
Standards.
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 2
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Kevin R. Klein Believe AFN is becoming accepted internationally
Abstain 1
Election:1616_MEP-AAA_FD_Ballot_F2016
Results by Revision
FR-12, Global Input, See FR-12
Mark E. Tinsman FR-12-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
FR-22, Global Input, See FR-22
Total Voted : 26
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-22-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
FR-50, Global Input, See FR-50
Total Voted : 26
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-50-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
FR-1, Chapter 1, See FR-1
Total Voted : 26
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-1-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
FR-7, Section No. 2.2, See FR-7
Total Voted : 26
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 24
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 0
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
FR-67, Section No. 3.3.1, See FR-67
Total Voted : 26
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-67-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-65, New Section after 3.3.9, See FR-65
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-65-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-64-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
FR-64, Section No. 3.3.15, See FR-64
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-29-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-29, Section No. 3.3.17, See FR-29
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-4-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-4, Section No. 3.3.20, See FR-4
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-26-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
FR-26, Section No. 3.3.27, See FR-26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 24
Affirmative with Comment 0
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-28-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-28, Section No. 3.3.31, See FR-28
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-27-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-27, New Section after 3.3.34, See FR-27
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-17-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-17, Chapter 4 [Title Only], See FR-17
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-16-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-16, Section No. 4.3.3, See FR-16
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
FR-9, Section No. 4.4.2, See FR-9
Total Voted : 26
Mark E. Tinsman FR-9-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
FR-11, Section No. 4.5.3, See FR-11
Total Voted : 26
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-11-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 2
Lawrence J. Shudak I am not sure what the committee's response means["The TC recognizes the
revisions as suggested through the various PI submitted to clarify the intent of
this section of the document."] but the issues sited in the PI (#202)for clause
5.9.2 were not resolved. The term "when feasible" does not meet the manual of
style for language in the body of a standard because it is not enforceable and is a
recommendation. Directing that a risk analysis is to be completed to determine
whether redundancy is to be implemented is in line with the manual of style. The
PI (#202) for 5.9.2 also recommends other critical factors which need to be
considered in addition to reliability and interoperability. Referencing NFPA 72
resolves this issue.
FR-5, Chapter 5, See FR-5
Total Voted : 26
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-5-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
FR-18, Section No. 6.2, See FR-18
Total Voted : 26
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-18-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
FR-19, Section No. 6.5.2, See FR-19
Total Voted : 26
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-19-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
FR-63, Section No. 6.5.5, See FR-63
Total Voted : 26
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-63-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
FR-36, Section No. 6.6.2, See FR-36
Total Voted : 26
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-36-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
FR-20, Section No. 6.6.3, See FR-20
Total Voted : 26
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 2
Jim Reidy Singling out one affected group such as "those who identify as transgender in
various stages of transition" that is already covered by anti discrimination laws is
not necessary.The evacuation shelter plan can address all types potential
evacuees covered by anti discrimination laws. otherwise the plan would have to
identify every single type of potential special category of potential evacuee.
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-20-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-21-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-21, Section No. 7.6, See FR-21
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-15-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-15, Chapter 8, See FR-15
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-23-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
FR-23, Section No. A.3.3.27, See FR-23
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-24-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-24, Section No. A.4.7.1, See FR-24
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-25-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-25, Section No. A.6.5.1, See FR-25
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 24
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 0
Total Voted : 26
FR-31, Chapter C, See FR-31
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-61-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-61, Chapter D [Title Only], See FR-61
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein Need consistency with AFN. Here disabilities is not consistent with Global change
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-30-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-30, Section No. D.1, See FR-30
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-62-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
FR-62, Chapter E [Title Only], See FR-62
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-37-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-37, Section No. E.1, See FR-37
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein Seems a bit more simplistic that what actually goes on
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
FR-35, Section No. E.4, See FR-35
Total Voted : 26
Mark E. Tinsman FR-35-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
FR-40, Section No. E.5, See FR-40
Total Voted : 26
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-40-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
FR-34, Section No. E.6, See FR-34
Total Voted : 26
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-34-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
FR-51, New Section after E.9, See FR-51
Total Voted : 26
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein Needs some word-smithing, e.g., terms like "demob"
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-51-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
FR-52, New Section after E.9, See FR-52
Total Voted : 26
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-52-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
FR-32, Section No. E.9, See FR-32
Total Voted : 26
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein Don't know that "required by most health departments" is accurate
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-32-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 2
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
Kevin R. Klein See FR-12 comment. Also, Shouldn't global changes be just that?
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-53-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-53, Chapter F [Title Only], See FR-53
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein See FR-12 comment
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-47-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
FR-47, Section No. F.3.1, See FR-47
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein See FR-12 comment
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-44-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-44, Section No. F.3.2.1, See FR-44
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
FR-45, Section No. F.3.2.3, See FR-45
Total Voted : 26
Mark E. Tinsman FR-45-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein Again FR-12 comment for the AFN changes in this section. Others OK
Negative 1
FR-46, Section No. F.3.3, See FR-46
Total Voted : 26
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-46-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
FR-66, Chapter G, See FR-66
Total Voted : 26
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-16-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
FR-55, New Section after G.3, See FR-55
Total Voted : 26
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 2
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Kevin R. Klein I am uncomfortable with J.5 down. States change and not sure I want to refer an
example as a specific state.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-55-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-56, New Section after G.3, See FR-56
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein Needs word-smithing.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-56-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-57-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-57, New Section after G.3, See FR-57
Total Voted : 26
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein Needs to be shrunk down a bit
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-58-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
FR-58, New Section after G.3, See FR-58
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 1
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 2
FR-59, New Section after G.3, See FR-59
Total Voted : 26
Mark E. Tinsman FR-59-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Kevin R. Klein Not clear as to the fit
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 22
Affirmative with Comment 2
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Kevin R. Klein Not sure I remember seeing each of the acronyms
Negative 1
FR-60, New Section after G.3, See FR-60
Total Voted : 26
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-60-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Eligible to Vote: 29
Not Returned : 3
Michael C. Maloney,Edward Witkowski,Erika S. Voss
Vote Selection Votes Comments
Affirmative 23
Affirmative with Comment 1
FR-48, Chapter H, See FR-48
Total Voted : 26
Amir Mousavi No comment.
Negative 1
Susan M. Dooha We are now celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Regrettably, the timing of revisions seemingly did not permit consideration
of new detailed guidance from the U.S. District Court applying the Americans
with Disabilities Act to Emergency Preparedness planning and disaster response.
The Court’s interpretation of the law now has bearing on this document. See
Case 1:11-cv-06690-JMF Document 159 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 119.
Subsequent guidance in the form of settlement agreements was also approved
by the Court, to offer assistance to planners. It is my hope that this document will
be reopened to apply the Court’s guidance so that jurisdictions that struggle to
comply with the law will have the most current statement of the law’s
requirements.
Abstain 1
Mark E. Tinsman FR-48-NFPA 1616-2015 has been listed as withdrawn by Submitter, therefore
nothing against which to affirm or provide a negative response
Total Voted : 26
