27
1 M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler and Z. Celik-Butler, Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington http://www.uta.edu/engineering/nano/ Delta Pressure Sensors Delta Pressure Sensors

M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler and Z. Celik-Butler, Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

  • Upload
    manjit

  • View
    35

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Delta Pressure Sensors. M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler and Z. Celik-Butler, Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington http://www.uta.edu/engineering/nano/. Delta Pressure Sensor Final Model. Packaged piezo resistors ~ 25 n m. Unsealed cavity ~ 7.5 µm. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

1

M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler and Z. Celik-Butler,

Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

http://www.uta.edu/engineering/nano/

Delta Pressure SensorsDelta Pressure Sensors

Page 2: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

2

Delta Pressure Sensor Model

Passivation layer ~ 600 nm

packaging layer ~ 1.35 µm

Unsealed cavity ~ 7.5 µm

Packaged piezo resistors ~ 25 nm

Z-scale exaggerated 5 times

Delta Pressure Sensor Final Model

Delta pressure (differential pressure) sensor is a type of pressure sensor which is used to detect pressure changes Delta pressure measures the pressure between two different points Here the pressure sensor is not sealed

Page 3: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

3

STRAIN YY PLOT STRAIN XX PLOT

Delta Pressure Sensor Results

DISPLACEMENT PLOTMISES STRESS PLOT

Page 4: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

4

Delta Pressure Sensor Fabrication

STEP 1 On a clean wafer spin-coat ~ 40 µm flexible polyimide as the substrate layer followed by 600 nm passivation layer

STEP 2 Spin polyimide and cure

STEP 3 Deposit ~ 2 µm membrane layer

STEP 4 Deposit ~ 25 nm thick Piezoresistors

NEXT STEPS Deposit ~ 500 nm thick aluminum as the metallization layer Deposit ~ 100 nm thick packaging layer to package the pressure sensors Ash the sacrificial layer using oxygen plasma to suspend the membrane Etch the silicon wafer from the back side to get access to the bond pads and characterize the delta pressure sensors

Passivation layer ~ 600 nm

membrane layer ~ 2 µm

packaging layer ~ 0.1 µm

Unsealed cavity ~ 7.5 µm

Packaged piezo resistors ~ 25 nm

Z-scale exaggerated 5 times

Piezo resistors ~ 25 nm

Passivation layer ~ 600 nm

Silicon nitride membrane layer ~ 2 µm

Sacrificial layer ~ 7.5µm

Page 5: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

5

Delta Pressure Sensor Fabrication StepsMembrane Layer + Packaging

Layer 1.35 µm

Metallization Layer Aluminum 0.5 µm

Piezoresistors

Polyimide completely gone Polyimide completely gone

Page 6: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

6

Delta Pressure Sensor Characterization

1 2 3 4Vout Vin Vout Vin R1

R2 R3

R4

Vin Vout

R1

R3R2

R4

The electrical circuit is complete with two active piezoresistors (R1 and R3) and two passive piezoresistors (R2 and R4) in a Wheatstone bridge configuration

The current-voltage characteristics is plotted and the true resistances are found

Page 7: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

7

Delta Pressure Sensor Characterization

P1 and P2 are passive piezoresistors whereas A1 and A2 are active piezoresistors RP1=9.386 KΩ RA1=9.987 KΩ RP2=9.824 KΩ RA2=6.625 KΩ

Page 8: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

İsmail Erkin Gönenli

Advisor: Zeynep Çelik-Butler

Department of Electrical EngineeringThe University of Texas, Arlington

Page 9: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

• Membrane serves to amplify the pressure, convert into mechanical strain and then transfer it to the piezoresistor.

• Piezoresistors convert strain into resistance change which is transferred intoelectrical signal by the Wheatstone bridge.

Wheatstone BridgePiezoresistors

Membrane

R1

R2R3R4

Membrane

R1

R2 R3

R4

Vin Vout

Active

Passive

Page 10: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

• Linear coupling between mechanical stress and change in resistivity given by:

ttllRΔR σΠσΠ

where R/R is the change in resistance, l and t and l and t arelongitudinal and transverse piezoresistive coefficients and appliedstresses respectively.

Direction of Stress

Direction of Current Flow

Transverse stress t Longitudinal stress l

Direction of stress and current flow arethe same

• S. Sze, “Semiconductor Sensors” , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York , 1994

Page 11: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

Device 1 Device 2

Device 3 Device 4 Device 5

110 µm x 110 µm90 µm x 90 µm

90 µm x 90 µm90 µm x 90 µm

90 µm x 90 µm

42.43 µm x 21.21 µm

35.36 µm x 21.21 µm

35.36 µm x 21.21 µm42.43 µm x 21.21 µm

x-axis

y-ax

is

4.5 m

16.5

m

4 m

4.5 m

16.5

m

4 m

4.5 m

16.5

m

4 m

2.5 m

13.5

m

4 m

9 m

2.6 m

3.8 m

6.8 m

Page 12: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

Device 6 Device 7

Device 8 Device 9 Device 10

x-axis

y-ax

is

110 µm x 110 µm90 µm x 90 µm

14.14 µm x 14.14 µm4.5 m

16.5

m

4 m

80 µm x 80 µm80 µm x 80 µm

80 µm x 80 µm

21.21 µm x 14.14 µm21.21 µm x 14.14 µm

2.5 m

9 m

4 m

2.5 m

13.5

m

4 m

42.43 µm x 21.21 µm

28.28 µm x 14.14 µm

2.5 m

11

m

4 m

9 m

2.6 m

3.8 m

6.8 m

Page 13: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

fixed

fixed

fixed

50 kPa load applied to the topof the membrane

fixed

• Simulations were performed using CoventorwareTM

• Twenty one pressure sensors with different membrane and piezoresistor dimensions and shapes were simulated among which ten showing best properties were selected.

• The normalized change in resistance is found to be 0.84-3.5% assuming a gauge factor of 50.

• Differential output voltages between 4.18-17.20 mV were obtained for 1 V input with a sensitivity range of 0.08 mV/kPa-0.34 mV/kPa.

Page 14: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

TOTAL

TOTALAVG Area

StrainStrain

dxdy

dxdyYYXX ][

εxx used for these parts

εyy used for these parts

Axis transformation has been applied

a- Calculation of the Average Strain

2 2cos sin sin cosx xx yy xy Axis transformation

Page 15: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

inout VVRR

RR

2

b- Calculation of the Output Voltage and Percent Change in Resistance

where 50 is the gauge factor for polysilicon

50*AVGRR Strain

for half bridge wheatstone structure

Page 16: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

• Si/ Si3N4 passivation layer/ flexible substrate (50 µm)/ Si3N4/ sacrificial layer/ Si3N4 membrane layer (~1.9 µm).

• Deep reactive ion etch to etch Si3N4 membrane and open trenches.• Trenches on flexible substrate were fabricated by lift-off

Trenches

Page 17: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

• Al layer (~0.5 µm)/ a-Si layer (~0.5 µm).• Piezoresistor fabrication.

Piezoresistors

Page 18: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

• Al metallization layer (~0.5 µm).• Patterning metallization layer.• Al bond pads (~0.5 µm).

Bond pads

Metallization

Page 19: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

• Oxygen plasma ashing to release the structure.

Page 20: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

• Non-linear I-V characteristics with resistances tens to hundreds of k were obtained

Before wire bonding After wire bonding

Page 21: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

R2 R4R3

R1

Vin

Vout

+-

Output voltage ismeasured here.

Input voltage is applied here.

Probe to apply pressure to the center.

• A maximum differential output voltage of 13.7 mV has been obtained for 1V bias at full membrane deflection.

Page 22: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

Device 1 Device 2 Device 3 Device 6110 µm x 110 µm 90 µm x 90 µm

• Four devices (Device 1, Device 2, Device 3 and Device 6) giving the highest voltage output in response to pressure were selected for determination of the actual piezoresistive gauge factor.

110 µm x 110 µm 90 µm x 90 µm

A

A’

Membrane (1.9 µm)Sacrificiallayer (3.1 µm)

Si substrate

Before removal of sacrificial layer

After removal of sacrificial layer

3.1 µm gap afterremoval of sacrificiallayer which is usedto support thestructure during fabrication

A

A

A’

A’

Page 23: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

The height given asaround 5 µm includesthe membrane whichis around 1.9 µm thick.The remainder is the distance taken at fullmembrane deflection.

Page 24: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

Applied Pressure: 78 MPa Applied Pressure: 120 MPa

Device 2

110 µm x 110 µm 90 µm x 90 µm

Device 1

Page 25: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

Device 3 Device 6

Applied Pressure: 128 MPa Applied Pressure: 73 MPa

110 µm x 110 µm 90 µm x 90 µm

Page 26: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

Device 1Results in Response to 78 MPa :Average Strain: 7.05 10-4

Change in Resistance (%) : 3.52Output Voltage: 17.30 mV for 1 V input

Device 2Results in Response to 120 MPa :Average Strain: 9.9 10-4

Change in Resistance (%) : 4.95Output Voltage: 24.15 mV for 1 V input

Device 3Results in Response to 128 MPa :Average Strain: 9.46 10-4

Change in Resistance (%) : 4.73Output Voltage: 23.10 mV for 1 V input

Device 6Results in Response to 73 MPa :Average Strain: 7.53 10-4

Change in Resistance (%) : 3.76Output Voltage: 18.45 mV for 1 V input

Page 27: M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler  and Z. Celik-Butler,  Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington

Sample Actual Gauge Factor Type of Device

1 6.36 Device 3

2 19.998 Device 1

3 18.533 Device 3

4 24.121 Device 6

5 22.878 Device 1

6 25.764 Device 1

7 13.615 Device 6

8 17.766 Device 3

9 6.079 Device 2

10 29.366 Device 3

11 14.903 Device 3

12 7.992 Device 6