28
Lydian’s Legal Update Webinar 12 December 2013 - Brussels

Lydian’s Legal Update Webinar · PDF fileIntroduction Welcome to Lydian’s Legal Update Webinar. This webinar is the last in a series of four this year. In order to guarantee the

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Lydian’s Legal Update Webinar

12 December 2013 - Brussels

Introduction

Welcome to Lydian’s Legal Update Webinar. This webinar is the last

in a series of four this year.

In order to guarantee the audio quality, you are all on listen only-

mode.

Should you have questions during the webinar, please do not

hesitate to use the Questions tool – Menu Go To Webinar.

At the end of the presentation we will deal with your most common

questions.

2

Agenda

Sales representatives: some recent case law

Employment team

The Constitutional Court of 7 November 2013 annuls important parts

of the Decree on Land and Building Policy: the end of the social

contribution for developers in housing construction projects?

Real Estate team

Anti-money laundering for lawyers

Corporate team

New Belgian Arbitration Act

Dispute Resolution team

3

Sales representatives – some recent case law

An Van Doorselaer

Associate

Employment team

E [email protected]

Sales representatives – some recent case law

A sales representative is an employee who: as his/her main obligation

searches for and visits clientele outside of the company premises

to negotiate and/or close contracts in the name of and for the employer (art. 88 ECA)

Therefore, the following are NOT sales representatives: A seller of phone subscriptions at a supermarket stand, who only

visits potential clients’ houses occasionally (Labour Court of Appeal Brussels, 16 November 2012)

Director Strategic Partnership who mainly operates through email and visits fairs, but not clients’ offices (Labour Court of Appeal Brussels, 7 December 2012)

5

Sales representatives – some recent case law

A qualification as a sales representative relevant for

amongst other things the:

Non-compete clause

Clientele indemnity

Non-compete clause: different rules (art. 104 ECA)

Example: Employer is not required to pay a non-competition

indemnity

BUT if present, employee is assumed to have brought in

clientele

6

Sales representatives – some recent case law

Clientele indemnity is due if:

Sales representative brought in new clients

Employment contract is terminated by employer without serious

cause or by employee for serious cause

Minimum seniority of one year exists

The indemnity is not due if employer proves termination does not

cause prejudice to the employee

7

Sales representatives – some recent case law

Clientele indemnity: Labour Court of Appeal Brussels, 2

November 2010

Employee sells glasses, has non-compete clause

Can employer prove employee did not bring in new clientele or

did not suffer prejudice due to dismissal?

Employer cannot prove employee did not bring in new clientele

(i.e. new clients or former clients); a decrease in business

numbers not sufficient

Employer cannot prove employee suffered no prejudice:

employee working for competitor and being able to visit the

same clients is not sufficient

Clientele indemnity due

8

Sales representatives – some recent case law

Clientele indemnity: Labour Court of Appeal Mons, 11

April 2013

Sales representative in real estate sector with no non-compete

clause

Can sales representative prove he brought in clientele?

Did not bring in clientele, as this must imply significant possibility

of future orders -> people who sell their houses are not loyal

clients who renew contract real estate agency

No clientele indemnity due

9

The Constitutional Court of 7 November 2013 annuls important

parts of the Decree on Land and Building Policy: the end of the

social contribution for developers in housing construction

projects?

Daphné Verbauwhede Associate

Real Estate team

E [email protected]

11

On 7 November 2013, the Constitutional Court nullified

important parts of the Decree on Land and Building Policy

Two judgments by the Constitutional Court regarding the decree

by the Flemish Region dated 27 March 2009 concerning the Land and Building Policy (“decreet Grond- en Pandenbeleid”):

1) Judgment dated 7 November 2013 no. 144/2013 concerning the regulations with regards to “living in your own region” (“wonen in eigen streek”)

2) Judgment dated 7 November 2013 no. 145/2013 concerning the regulations with regards to the social contributions for the implementation of a social housing policy

11

12

On 7 November 2013, the Constitutional Court nullified

important parts of the Decree on Land and Building Policy

§ 1) Judgment dated 7 November 2013 no. 144/2013 concerning

the regulations with regards to “living in your own region” (“wonen in eigen streek”)

What do these regulations imply?

Objective: the regulation imply that houses in certain municipalities, which have

experienced a strong and substantial immigration, are to be reserved for

municipalities’ own inhabitants.

Consequence: specific conditions to be complied with in case of a transfer of title of

certain lots and buildings constructed on them.

Condition: the existence of an adequate bond between the person acquiring the

property and the municipality in which the property is situated.

European Court of Justice dated 8 May 2013

The regulations violate several fundamental rights, such as freedom of movement

and establishment, the free rendering of services and the free movement of capital.

12

13

On 7 November 2013, the Constitutional Court nullified

important parts of the Decree on Land and Building Policy

Constitutional Court decision of 7 November 2013

The regulations conflict with several fundamental rights

Conditions of the Decree are increasingly less compatible with the

original objective of protecting the less-wealthy people when entering the

real estate market.

There exist less limiting and less discretionary measures to reach the

objectives set out in the Decree (e.g. subsidies).

Consequence: the regulations with regards to “living in your own

region” are to be nullified in its entirety.

This nullification has a retroactive effect, despite the request of the

Flemish Government to mitigate the nullification

13

14

On 7 November 2013, the Constitutional Court nullified

important parts of the Decree on Land and Building Policy

§ 2) Judgment dated 7 November 2013 nr. 145/2013 concerning the regulations with regards to the social contributions for the implementation of a social housing policy

In case of construction or subdivision projects of a certain dimension,

the principal or developer is obliged to reserve a certain percentage

of the houses or lots for social ends (this is the so-called “social

contribution”).

To compensate the principal or developer, the decree sets out a

number of tax incentives and subsidy mechanisms.

Constitutional court

These compensation measures can be considered as state aid, meaning that these

measures require prior notification to the European Commission

These measures are thus to be nullified

Because of that, private actors are subject to this social contribution without any

form of compensation

Such social contributions is not consistent with the objective to implement a social

housing policy

14

15

On 7 November 2013, the Constitutional Court nullified

important parts of the Decree on Land and Building Policy

This nullification has a retroactive effect as well, despite the request of

the Flemish Government to mitigate the nullification.

All projects developed in accordance with the Decree on Land and

Building Policy are hereby affected.

A tricky situation: the Constitutional Court nullifies the compensation

measures, but it does not explicitly nullify the social contribution.

Consequence: it is unclear how this social contribution is to be

implemented and realized.

An initiative by the Flemish Government or Flemish Parliament is

required!

15

Anti-money laundering for lawyers

Michaël Zadworny Associate

Corporate team

E [email protected]

Concept of Money Laundering

The conversion or transfer of money or assets in order to hide or disguise

their illegal origin or to help those involved in the realisation of a criminal act

— from where the money or assets come — to avoid the legal

consequences of their acts.

Hiding or disguising the nature, the origin, the place, the arrangement, the

movement, or the ownership of the money or the assets of which the illegal

origin is known.

Acquisition, detention, use of money or assets of which the illegal origin is

known.

Involvement in one of the acts described above (in the first three items),

(tentative) collaboration in committing such act, to help or incite or advise

someone to commit one of these acts or to ease its execution.

17

Legislative framework and scope of application

for lawyers

Repressive article 505 Criminal Code

unlimited application and criminal sanctions

Preventive limited application ( e.g. terrorism; illegal drug/weapon traffic; serious tax fraud)

and only administrative fines

specific restrictions for lawyers due to professional secrecy (e.g. defending or representing client in litigation)

Scope of application for lawyers participating in the act for and on behalf of his client in any financial or real estate

transaction

buying and selling of real property or business entities

managing of client money, securities or other assets

opening or managing bank, savings or securities accounts

organising monetary contributions that are necessary for the creation, operation or management of companies

creating, operating or managing of companies, trusts or similare entities

18

Legal requirements

Identification of clients

Ongoing monitoring

Retention of documents (five years)

Training of personnel

Reporting to the President of the Bar

19

Prohibition on disclosure and immunity

It is prohibited to inform the client or any third party that a

report was made to the Financial Intelligence Unit or that

a criminal investigation relating to money laundering is

taking place.

When a suspicious transaction is being reported, the

lawyer must stop working for the client.

Reporting in good faith of a suspicious transaction will

provide immunity for all civil, criminal or disciplinary

claims, and no professional sanctions can be imposed

on the lawyer.

20

Supervision and sanctions

Supervision

External supervision by:

Commission de contrôle or President of the Bar (OBFG)

The local Bars of the OVB

Investigations are conducted upon the request of the President of

the Bar or the CTIF/CFI, or by random selection

Sanctions

Disciplinary sanctions

Administrative fines of between EUR 250 and EUR 1.250.000

21

New Belgian Arbitration Act

Marijn De Ruysscher Associate

Dispute Resolution team

E [email protected]

What is arbitration?

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Solving disputes through a private dispute resolution

mechanism court proceedings

Ad Hoc or institutional arbitration (ICC, CEPANI, …)

Arbitral awards can be enforced like court decisions

Arbitration proceedings are always linked to a certain

country (= place of arbitration) and governed by that

country’s arbitration law

23

New, modern Belgian Arbitration Act

No modification, but completely new Act (Part VI of the

Judicial Code)

Based on the UNCITRAL Model Law (= modernization

and harmonization) with some Belgian accents

Goal = strengthening Belgium’s position as centre for

national and international arbitration

Entry into force: 1 September 2013 for all new arbitration

proceedings as from that date; pending arbitration

proceedings remain governed by former Arbitration Act

24

Highlights

New criterion for arbitrability: (i) any pecuniary claim, or

(ii) any non-pecuniary claim with regard to which a

settlement may be made

Electronic communication: confirmation of existing

practice

Contractual challenge procedure: expressly allowed to

avoid courts judging otherwise

25

Highlights

Modified setting aside proceedings

No longer possibility for appeal (avoid judicial backlog)

Only five courts of first instance have jurisdiction (specialization)

Certain grounds for setting aside have been removed (such as

those relating to certain formalities and “conflicting reasoning”)

One standardized delay: three months after receiving the award

26

Highlights

Remittance of the arbitral award to the arbitral tribunal

Possibility for the court deciding on the setting aside of an

arbitral award

Objective = to save an arbitral award when such possibility exists

by sending the arbitral award back to the arbitral tribunal

allowing it to remove grounds for setting aside

In line with new CEPANI Arbitration Rules

Experience from other Model Law countries: courts are reluctant

to use this option

27

Thank you for your attention.

Q&A

28