Utilizing EHS Resources Through Major Restructuring(and still provide service to clients)

October 17, 2012

Who is PG&E?

Incorporated 1905 One of the largest

bi ti t lcombination natural gas and electric utilities in the United States20 000 l 20,000 employees provide service to approximately 15 million CaliforniansCalifornians

70,000-square-mile service area

“PG&E” refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company a subsidiary of PG&E Corpoation. ©2011 Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved.

Who is PG&E?

Nearly 160,000 circuit miles of electric transmission and distribution lines.

Approximately 49,000 miles of natural gas transmission and distribution pipelines

Generation capacity of over 7,300 MW

5.1 million electric customer accounts

4.3 million natural gas customer accounts (as of July, 2011).

“PG&E” refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. ©2011 Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved.

Environmental Organization - October 2011

Environmental Land and EnvironmentalEnvironmental Operations

Land and Environmental Management

Environmental Remediation

Environmental Policy

4

October 2011

Environmental Land and EnvironmentalEnvironmental Operations

Land and Environmental Management

No VP!

Environmental Remediation

Environmental Policy

5

6

Environmental Remediation

Environmental Policy

7

Environmental Operations

8

Land and EnvironmentalLand and Environmental Management

9

New VP Priorities

• Focus groups held

• Cross functional; department widep• What’s working• What’s not

• Outreach to clients

• One point of contactE dit d it• Expedited permits

• One point of contact• Faster permits• One point of contact• One point of contact

• Creation of systems and standards group

10

The problem

• Too many projects, too little time

• Sporadic coverage for programmatic issuesp g p g

• Divided Resources – people doing multiple projects on multiple timeframes with varying sense of urgency

• Confusion as to “who’s on first” within Environmental

C f i ith li t j t t t• Confusion with clients on project status

11

Developing the solution

• How best to structure

• By line of business?y• By type of work?• By current employee team?• A combination?

• How best to deploy resources

100 i / t /h t SME 150 bi l i t /l d l / 200• 100 air/water/hazmat SMEs, 150 biologists/land planners/ 200 surveyors/land agents

12

Developing the solution, 2

• Ultimately decision was made to align by types of work

• Distribution (Gas & Electric)( )• Transmission

• Gas• Electric

• Energy Supply

13

Developing the solution, 3

• Deploying resources

• Look at past chargeback practicesp g p

• Other considerations

• Geographical location• Pending business needs• Personal preference/skill set

• Headcount neutral exercise

14

Transition

• Identifying projects

• Developing process for warm handoffp g p

• Establishing Systems and Standards group

• Spinning Land Management into their own group

15

Environmental Organization – October 2012

Vice PresidentEnvironmentalJanet Loduca

Di t

DirectorLand Mgmt

Doug Mayekawa

Executive AsstMary Nicolini

DirectorEnv Mgmt

TransmissionRebecca Doidge

(Interim)

Doug Mayekawa

DirectorEnv Policy

Diane Ross-LeechDirectorEnv Mgmt

Distribution & Shared Services

Megan LumDirector

Systems & StandardsDiane Thurman

Diane Ross-Leech

DirectorEnv Mgmt

Energy SupplyMariano Mandler

DirectorEnv Remediation

Tom Wilson

Env Mgmt – Distribution & Shared Services

DirectorDistribution and Shared Services

Megan Lum

ManagerFacilities

Angela Risdon (interim)

Admin FunctionsVince Putong

Vasi YiannakopoulosMabel Perez

ManagerProjectsVacant

Air SMEG M

SouthSupervisor – Dave

Germann

Mabel PerezElaine Harp

Vacant

Land ConsultantP MGary Ma Germann

(6 EFS, 1 LP)

SPCC/W t SMECentral

Pam Money

Central Hub – San Ramon(1 LPA, 1 LP, 2 Bio,

1 EFS, 1 *CRS)HCP

SPCC/Water SMEVacant

Supervisor – Andrea Ricci(6 EFS, 1 LP)

Supervisor – Bill Coleman(HCP Admin, 3 LPA

Progrmmatic Permits Admin)

Hazmat SMEAnke Neumann

NorthSupervisor – Hugo Jurado

(interim)(7 EFS, 1 LP, 1 Bio)

Env Mgmt TransmissionDirector

TransmissionREBECCA DOIDGE

(Interim)

ManagerET&S Projects and

FacilitiesCHIP KOCH

ManagerGT Projects and

FacilitiesBRIAN FRANTZ

Land ConsultantT-LINE

GLEN LUBCKE

SupervisorSan Francisco - Projects

NICOLE KELNER

Land ConsultantGas

ROB STIVING

SupervisorProjects - Planning & Permitting

JENNIFER DARCANGELO

Land ConsultantGIS/500kV/RRDBOB MASUOKA

SupervisorSan Ramon – Projects

STEPHANIE CIMINO (Interim)

Land ConsultantGas

DON TRIPLETT

SupervisorProjects - Air, Water, Haz

DANIEL SANCHEZ

Land ConsultantConstruction Compliance

KEVIN JANIK

Supervisor Sacramento – Projects

LONN MAIER

SupervisorGT Facilities

HEATHER CRAWFORD

SupervisorSubstations Area-wide

SHAWN HOOVER

Supervisor Fresno – Projects

SARAH GASSNER

90 Days After…..

• Both benefits and challenges identified

• Benefits:

• Improved relationships with clients• Improved planning for future work coordination• Integrated teams allowing improved project support

• Challenges:

• Increased need for communication across Environmental teams• Work assignments in some groups are changing

• Require more communication to maintain continuity• Require more communication to maintain continuity• Adjustment to new reporting relationships

19

20