Upload
tanmoy-chakraborty
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 1/31
Real Estate and Portfolio Theory
Lecture Map – Review of Portfolio Management Theories
Asset allocation using the efficient frontier
Immunization and liability hedging
– Role of Real Estate in an Investment Portfolio
– Asset selection within the Real Estate Asset
Class What do institutions want from their real estate
investments?
Is there a „best way‟ to select real estate investments?
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 2/31
Real Estate Investing in the Context of
Portfolio Theory
Investing in real estate offers an ideal fit withportfolio theory
– Efficient Frontier → low correlation → diversification → fixed income and
appreciation attributes – Immunization → fixed income attributes
→ „alpha‟ enhancementopportunities
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 3/31
Portfolio Management Theories
Efficient Frontier Theory – Optimize combination of assets along the “efficient frontier”
to maximize returns relative to acceptable level of risk
– Diversify portfolio using mean variance theory to reducecorrelation of returns
Immunization Strategies
– Select base portfolio to cover projected stream of liabilities – Balance of the portfolio invested to enhance returns – i.e.,
increase “alpha”
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 4/31
The Efficient Frontier
In theory, investors should maximize returns at themargin for the amount of risk they are willing to bear
“Risk” in this case is measured by the volatility of
returns and the correlation - or lack thereof - of relative returns across asset classes
Assets are worth more in combination thanindividually if optimally combined based on thecovariance of their returns
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 5/31
Defining the Frontier
Frontier represents unique combinations of assets that optimizerisk adjusted returns
– i.e., optimal covariance between holdings in portfolio At each point along the Frontier, there are no “dominant”
portfolios – i.e., no portfolios that offer greater return given the risk level
Any other asset combinations either increase risk for same or lower returns, or decrease return for at least the same level of risk
Adding imperfectly correlated assets to a portfolio extends theefficient frontier to the NW, providing better reward to riskpayoffs – The lower the correlation, the greater the benefit of diversification
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 6/31
Portfolio Selection Using Mean
Variance Analysis
Start with the expected returns and the
covariance between the different assetclasses.
Find the mean-variance efficient portfolio of the different asset classes.
– If the expected returns of the different assetclasses change over time, asset allocationschange
– Investment managers in practice are continually
“re-balancing” their portfolios against the target
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 7/31
Mathematics of Mean Variance Theory
R j – r f = a + B(R p – r f )If a is positive, then the portfolio underweights asset i.
Example: Suppose that real estate has a beta of .3 wrt the reference
portfolio, and an expected return of 4% above the risk free rate, and
the reference portfolio has an expected return of 6% above the risk
free rate. Then real estate will have an a of 2.2%, implying that the
reference portfolio underweights real estate.
To find the optimal portfolio, iterate until all the alphas are zero.
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 8/31
Real Estate and the Efficient Frontier
(from the NAREIT site)
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 9/31
CAPM and The Efficient Frontier
CAPM takes the risk adjusted return theory down to the assetlevel
If markets converge around risk/return expectations – themarket clearing price for assets – then only the relative risk of one asset versus others matters at the margin – Diversification should eliminate asset specific risk
– “Beta” management
Implies that all investors at any given risk level or return targetshould have basically the same assets in their portfolios at eachpoint along the curve
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 10/31
CAPM and Asset Allocation
Choosing the asset mix of your portfolio – Growth stocks – Value stocks – Fixed Income – Real Estate
Direct Commingled Funds REITs
Should the asset mix change over time? – Timing – Style Rotation
Does the CAPM really help with asset selection? – Especially with selecting real estate investments?
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 11/31
Special Challenges for Real Estate in
the Efficient Frontier Model
The mean variance asset allocation model suggests thatpension funds have been historically underweighting real estateand value stocks.
One theory is that these models ignore reinvestment risk.
– Suppose that expected rates of return on risky investmentsdecline.
– This causes asset prices to increase (which is good) butimplies that new investments will realize a lower rate of return (which is bad).
– Growth stocks tend to realize the highest returns in thesesituations, and thus provide the best hedge against areduction in reinvestment risk. Hence, growth stocksdeserve a higher allocation than implied by the mean
variance model.
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 12/31
Special Challenges for Real Estate with
the Efficient Frontier Model (cont.)
In practice, it is very difficult to measure covariances for realestate – A number of studies assume unrealistically low covariances for
real estate which result in very high allocations Versus the mean variance theory which traditionally has
underweighted real estate Historical data is not as robust as it is for stocks, bonds, making
measurement even more difficult
Private real estate markets are also fragmented, inefficient,illiquid – Some properties correlate well with bonds – single credit net lease
deals, multi-family – Others exhibit high volatility – hotels, suburban office – Performance can vary significantly between properties, markets
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 13/31
Another Challenge of the Mean
Variance Model
The mean variance model also ignores
pension liabilities. – Plan sponsors would like to generate income that
matches their liabilities.
– Liabilities are likely to increase with income
levels. – One might expect real estate returns to roughly
increase with increases in income, which wouldmake real estate more attractive than thepredictions of the mean variance model.
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 14/31
Real Estate, Re-Balancing the Portfolio
and the Efficient Frontier
Lack of liquidity in private real estate poses achallenge in re-balancing – Institutions favor direct deals that offer some
relative control over exit timing
Benchmarking against target returns andindexes is also problematic for real estate – Most targets are annual
– Most indexes are benchmarked quarterly
– Real estate is a long term asset!
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 15/31
REITS and the Efficient Frontier Model
Where do REITs fit in: are they really a differentasset class than real estate? – Need to also ask whether REITs are different than other
value stocks. The high allocation to REITs in some studiesignore the substitution between REITs and other valuestocks.
At least REITs offer the ability to build a long termdata base with the mark - to – market characteristicsof stock and bond indices – Should improve the analysis of REIT covariances over time
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 16/31
Portfolio Immunization
Investment strategy based on meeting planned and/or projected liabilities versus a target rate of return
Methodology splits the portfolio into two pieces: – Core investments indexed to liability streams
Generates income to match size, timing of liabilities Ties well with fixed income investments
– Balance of the portfolio invested to enhance total return Alternative assets, equities, etc. “Alpha” management
Works best with fully and/or overfunded pension plans – Underfunded plans are by definition behind the total return curve in
meeting even known liabilities – May need to take more risk to meet obligations
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 17/31
Portfolio Immunization (cont.)
Immunization is getting lots of attention in the
portfolio management world today: – “Post bubble” phenomenon
Institutional portfolios severely hurt by tech boom/bust
Portfolio discipline was missing in over-allocation totech, private equity and venture capital
Concern over looming obligations to retiring babyboomers
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 18/31
How Big was the Bubble?
D J I A S & P 5 0 0 N a s d a q
A ug 29, 2003 Price 9 , 4 1 6 1 , 0 0 8 1 , 8 1 0
Peak Price 1 1 , 7 2 3 1 , 5 2 7 5 , 0 4 8D ateofPeak 1/ 14/ 2000 3/24/ 2000 3/10/ 2000
Yearsto Peak Prospect i veR eturns (%)
1year 2 4 . 5 5 1 .5 1 7 8 .9
2years 1 1 . 6 2 3 .1 67 5years 4 . 5 8 .7 2 2 .8
10years 2 . 2 4 .2 1 0 .8
15years 1 . 5 2 .8 7.1
20years 1 . 1 2 .1 5.3
25years 0 . 9 1 .7 4.2
Returns Needed to Get Back to the Peak
DJIA S&P 500 Nasdaq
Aug 29, 2003 Price 9,416 1,008 1,810Peak Price 11,723 1,527 5,048
Date of Peak 1/14/2000 3/24/2000 3/10/2000
Years to Peak Prospective Returns (%)
1 year 24.5 51.5 178.9
2 years 11.6 23.1 67
5 years 4.5 8.7 22.8
10 years 2.2 4.2 10.8
15 years 1.5 2.8 7.1
20 years 1.1 2.1 5.3
25 years 0.9 1.7 4.2
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 19/31
Other Attractions of Immunization
Stop the proliferation of „asset classes‟ – Immunization would classify assets by their role in the
portfolio as opposed to role in diversification “what is the job” of each asset? Inflation hedge; current income; long term growth
– Addresses concern that covariance analysis may be lessrelative as the global economy gets more interdependent
– Will whole markets and asset classes become more
vulnerable to each other? How efficient is asset allocation today anyway?
– Look at real estate fundamentals vs. pricing – Are we creating another bubble of a different type?
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 20/31
Why Real Estate Looks So Good in the
Immunization World
Real estate combines return features of both bondsand stocks with low correlations to those asset
classes – Current income and total return – Same argument used by the efficient frontier model, but for
immunizers, the current income provides a hedge againstliabilities; growth component offers “alpha”
Real estate also offers multiple investment strategies
within the asset class to enhance alpha – Opportunistic plays – Property type and sector plays – Market selection
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 21/31
Does Immunization Work?(or, Does it Really Make Any Difference
Which Approach You Use?)
Does this strategy makes sense for portfolios that wereseverely damaged in the bust? –
Significant number of pension funds today are underfunded – Evidenced by stress on Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp.
Is the eventual portfolio outcome going to be that much differentunder this theory than under efficient frontier theory? – Both call for diversification
– Both require a minimum return target
– Both look to increase alpha on a relative basis, or against selectedbenchmarks
Can real estate be effectively used as an immunization tool?
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 22/31
Role of Real Estate in An Investment
Portfolio
Regardless of theory, widely agreed today that realestate should be a part of every investor‟s portfolio
Also generally agreed that investors are on averagesignificantly underweighted in real estate – Institutional universe has approximate 2% of assets in real
estate This small allocation still represents $80 billion in privates, $12
billion in REITS and REOC‟s
– Only the largest pension funds invest in real estate 25 largest funds control 74% of all pension fund investments in
real estate – Control 82% of all pension investments in REITs
– The rest of universe hasn‟t shown up for the party!
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 23/31
Institutional Real Estate Strategies
Involves Selection of Investment Vehicles andManagers
Primary Investment Vehicles: – Private Equity Real Estate Funds
Core
Value-Add
Opportunistic
– REITs Market proxies
Regional, property type plays
– Direct Deals
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 24/31
Institutional Real Estate Strategies
(cont.)
Implementation of any strategy is critically
dependent upon manager selection – Expertise and track record Deal experience
History of producing targeted returns
–
Transparency How good, frequent, honest is the reporting?
– Alignment of Interests Incentive-based reward structure
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 25/31
Institutional Real Estate Strategies
(cont.)
Institutions invest disproportionately inprivate, direct deals today – Public REIT markets, universe of private equity
funds too small to accommodate available capital
– Selection of, relationship with manager is key Real and/or perceived ability to influence operations and
outcome of the investment – Facilitates periodic rebalancing if needed
Less liquidity than a REIT, but more than a fund with agreater degree of control over the asset, exit timing
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 26/31
Real Estate Investment Strategies –
Moving Beyond the Vehicle
Real Estate provides multiple opportunities toenhance returns at the margin – “alpha” – in all
investment vehicles – Stage and/or strategy selection – Property type allocation – Regional allocation – Market Selection – Property Selection
What are the selection issues? – Correlation between strategies – Long term economic and demographic shifts
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 27/31
Return and Risk Attributes for InvestmentStages and Strategies
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
13%
14%
15%
16%
17%
18%
19%
20%
T a r g e t e d
U n l e v e r a g e d
I n t e r n a l R a t e
o f R e t u r n
Core
Re-capitalization
Lease-up,Re-tenantingor Renovation
Forward
CommitmentDevelopment
Core Re-capitalization
Renovation
Lease-up
Forward
Commitmenton Development Development
• Stable Market• Class A & B
Properties• Prime Location• Objective: 8-10%
IRR
• 80%
+
• Leasing Risk• JV Structure• Retain Control• Objective:
10-12% IRR
• Substantial Initial or Near-term Vacancy
• Low Initial Yield• Objective: 11-13%
IRR
• Major CapitalExpenditures
• Increase Revenues• Objective: 11-13% IRR
• Minimal ConstructionRisk
• Minimal Zoning/Entitlement Risk
• Fund at Completion• Leasing Risk• JV or Wholly-Owned• Objective: 12-14% IRR
• Limited ConstructionRisk
• Leasing Risk• Minimal Zoning and
Entitlement Risk• Objective: 13-18%
IRR
Development
EntityInvesting
Entity Investing
• Operating Partner Risk• Reduced Level of Control• 40-90% Leverage• Objective: 18% + IRR
Risk Attributes
Value-Added Strategies
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 28/31
Property Type Allocation
Office and Industrial properties are most cyclical,most closely reflect economic cycles
– Office → either the best or the worst performer. A laggingindicator. Time the cycles, underweight suburban“commodity” deals in general
– Industrial → generally outperforms office, more stablereturns than office. More of a leading indicator.
Retail and Multifamily are considered more stable – Retail → negative correlation with office, good absolutereturns. Reflects consumer-driven economy – Multifamily → considered defensive, counter-cyclical.
Influenced by demographic trends as well as job growth
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 29/31
Regional Allocation
Property type selection within regions is important – Gets back to economic base analysis! – What industries, activities drive the local economy and will be reflected in
real estate needs? East and West
– Higher returns, higher risk – More heavily concentrated in office product because of the financial focus
of coastal economies
Midwest – Correlated with the East coast, although more heavily industrial in nature
South – Low correlations with West, higher risk adjusted returns on average than
either coast – Long term demographic shifts favor the south
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 30/31
Market Selection
Drivers of Market Selection: – Employment growth and comparative economic strength – Ease of adding new supply
– Historical absorption track record – Property preferences → which do better in given market?
International vs. National Markets: – Direct comparisons are difficult to make
U.S. market is a “traded” market; foreign markets are not Long term holds might favor stability of yield in W. Europe
– Does the recommended diversification model apply here? – Prologis strategy: provide U.S.-style service to customers in foreign
markets – Goldman approach: move opportunistically in and out of international
markets
7/28/2019 LS.real Estate and Portfolio Theory
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lsreal-estate-and-portfolio-theory 31/31
Property Selection
Pick your size – Smaller assets has historically outperformed larger assets
Wider audience offers greater liquidity
If your holding period is short, evaluated exit opportunity Pick within asset classes
– Suburban vs. CBD office CBD considered more stable
– Regional mall vs. power center vs. neighborhood center Neighborhood center in favor
– Flex R&D vs. distribution
Flex R&D is more cyclical – Garden-style multifamily vs. high rise, urban condominium
Garden-style considered more generic and defensive
– Full service, limited service, resort hotels Luxury full service most defensive, resort most cyclical