210
LSHTM Research Online Blencowe, H; Cousens, S; Jassir, FB; Say, L; Chou, D; Mathers, C; Hogan, D; Shiekh, S; Qureshi, ZU; You, D; +87 more... Lawn, JE; Lancet Stillbirth Epidemiology Investigator Group; , COLLAB- ORATORS; Zhu, J; Liang, J; Mu, Y; Li, X; Costello, A; Colbourn, T; Fottrell, E; Prost, A; Osrin, D; King, C; Neuman, M; Shah More, N; Azad, K; Manandhar, D; Nair, N; Tripathy, P; Kumar, R; Newtonraj, A; Kaur, M; Gupta, M; Dhaliwal, LK; Aggarwal, N; Venkateshashan; Chawla, D; Hurja, A; Shivkumar, P; Jain, M; Gathwala, G; Nanda, S; Gupta, S; Singal, S; Kumar, R; Sharma, S; Mohi, M; Minhas, S; Prasad, R; Verma, S; Raina, N; Musafi li, A; Varghese, B; Pattison, R; Hirst, J; Waiswa, P; Kadobera, D; Kujala, S; Bergstrom, A; Phiri, T; Hall, JA; Day, LT; Saha, SL; Alam, Su; Rahman, A; El-Arifeen, S; Rubayet, S; Hassan, AA; Smith, L; Manktelow, BN; Draper, ES; Zhong, N; Langhoff -Roos, J; Flenady, V; Allvee, K; Gissler, M; Lack, N; Wangdi, S; Cap, J; Podmanicka, Z; Szamotulska, K; Hukkelhoven, C; Dijs-Elsinga, J; Kyprianou, T; Klungsøyr, K; de Maria Herandez, F; Curteanu, A; Barros, H; a Correia, S; Tsiklauri, S; Lundqvist, E; Ilboudo, TF; Bah, A; Jawara, L; Zeitlin, J; Isakova, J; Poppe, O; (2016) National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global health, 4 (2). e98-e108. ISSN 2214-109X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2 Downloaded from: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2 Usage Guidelines: Please refer to usage guidelines at https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/policies.html or alternatively contact [email protected]. Available under license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk

LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

LSHTM Research Online

Blencowe, H; Cousens, S; Jassir, FB; Say, L; Chou, D; Mathers, C; Hogan, D; Shiekh, S; Qureshi,ZU; You, D; +87 more... Lawn, JE; Lancet Stillbirth Epidemiology Investigator Group; , COLLAB-ORATORS; Zhu, J; Liang, J; Mu, Y; Li, X; Costello, A; Colbourn, T; Fottrell, E; Prost, A; Osrin,D; King, C; Neuman, M; Shah More, N; Azad, K; Manandhar, D; Nair, N; Tripathy, P; Kumar, R;Newtonraj, A; Kaur, M; Gupta, M; Dhaliwal, LK; Aggarwal, N; Venkateshashan; Chawla, D; Hurja,A; Shivkumar, P; Jain, M; Gathwala, G; Nanda, S; Gupta, S; Singal, S; Kumar, R; Sharma, S; Mohi,M; Minhas, S; Prasad, R; Verma, S; Raina, N; Musafi li, A; Varghese, B; Pattison, R; Hirst, J; Waiswa,P; Kadobera, D; Kujala, S; Bergstrom, A; Phiri, T; Hall, JA; Day, LT; Saha, SL; Alam, Su; Rahman,A; El-Arifeen, S; Rubayet, S; Hassan, AA; Smith, L; Manktelow, BN; Draper, ES; Zhong, N; Langhoff-Roos, J; Flenady, V; Allvee, K; Gissler, M; Lack, N; Wangdi, S; Cap, J; Podmanicka, Z; Szamotulska,K; Hukkelhoven, C; Dijs-Elsinga, J; Kyprianou, T; Klungsøyr, K; de Maria Herandez, F; Curteanu, A;Barros, H; a Correia, S; Tsiklauri, S; Lundqvist, E; Ilboudo, TF; Bah, A; Jawara, L; Zeitlin, J; Isakova,J; Poppe, O; (2016) National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trendsfrom 2000: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global health, 4 (2). e98-e108. ISSN 2214-109X DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2

Downloaded from: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2

Usage Guidelines:

Please refer to usage guidelines at https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/policies.html or alternativelycontact [email protected].

Available under license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/

https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk

Page 2: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

Supplementary appendixThis appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed. We post it as supplied by the authors.

Supplement to: Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, et al, for The Lancet Stillbirth Epidemiology Investigator Group. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2016; published online Jan 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2.

Page 3: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

1

National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with

trends from 2000: a systematic analysis

Authors Hannah Blencowe, Simon Cousens, Fiorella Bianchi Jassir, Lale Say, Doris Chou, Colin Mathers, Dan Hogan, Suhail Shiekh, Zeshan U Qureshi, Danhzen You, Joy E Lawn

For the Lancet Stillbirth investigator group

Contents Definitions and country groupings.......................................................................................................... 3

Countries by region ............................................................................................................................. 3

Data inputs .............................................................................................................................................. 5

Strategy for systematic searches of the published literature ............................................................. 5

Search terms: .................................................................................................................................. 5

SBR:NMR quality criteria ..................................................................................................................... 8

Table limitations of SBR28:NMR ratio as quality criteria: ............................................................... 8

Trends in SBR:NMR ratio in HIC countries ...................................................................................... 8

SBR:NMR ratio in higher mortality settings .................................................................................. 10

Input data meeting inclusion criteria included N=2207 ................................................................... 12

Summary of stillbirth rate data inputs meeting inclusion criteria by Millennium Development Goal

region ................................................................................................................................................ 66

Data availability over time by region ................................................................................................ 67

Comparison with previous data inputs ............................................................................................. 67

Overall input data: ........................................................................................................................ 67

National or Nationally representative data only: ......................................................................... 67

Quality categorisation of national routine data ............................................................................... 68

Table of countries with higher quality national routine data ....................................................... 70

Predictor variables ................................................................................................................................ 70

Identification of predictor variables for model input ....................................................................... 70

Source of potential predictor variables tested in models ................................................................ 71

Data adjustments: ................................................................................................................................. 72

Small countries .................................................................................................................................. 72

Non-standard definitions in Developed Region ................................................................................ 72

Adjusting for 1000g to ≥28 week definition ................................................................................. 72

Adjusting for ≥24 weeks to ≥28 weeks definition ......................................................................... 73

Adjusting for ≥22 weeks to ≥28 weeks definition ......................................................................... 74

Adjusting for ≥20 weeks to ≥28 weeks definition ......................................................................... 74

Page 4: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

2

Adjusting for ‘all fetal deaths’ to ≥28 weeks definition ................................................................ 74

Adjusting where no definition is given ......................................................................................... 74

Table - summary of adjustments: ................................................................................................. 75

Non-standard definitions in Other Regions ...................................................................................... 75

Implausibility criteria ........................................................................................................................ 76

Model selection .................................................................................................................................... 76

Final model equation ........................................................................................................................ 77

Figure: Diagnostic plots for the stillbirth prediction regression model ............................................ 78

Loess region plots for countries using own data .............................................................................. 80

Calculation of stillbirth numbers....................................................................................................... 99

Uncertainty estimation ..................................................................................................................... 99

Results ................................................................................................................................................. 100

Table: Estimated stillbirth rate by country for 2000 and 2015 ....................................................... 100

Graphs by country of data inputs and stillbirth rate estimates with associated uncertainty ........ 105

Graphs of input data and estimated stillbirth rates by region ........................................................... 203

Comparison of neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate data and estimates: ........................................ 207

References .......................................................................................................................................... 208

Page 5: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

3

Definitions and country groupings

Countries by region

Developed Region Southern Asia Caucasus and Central Asia

Eastern Asia Latin America and

the Caribbean North Africa and

Middle East South-eastern

Asia and Oceania Sub-Saharan Africa

Albania Andorra Australia Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Japan Latvia Lithuania

Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka

Armenia Azerbaijan Georgia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan

China Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Mongolia Republic of Korea

Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru

Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Libya Morocco Occupied Palestinian Territory Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen

Brunei Darussalam Cambodia Cook Islands Fiji Indonesia Kiribati Lao People’s Democratic Republic Malaysia Marshall Islands Micronesia (Federated States of) Myanmar Nauru Niue Palau Papua New Guinea Philippines Samoa Singapore Solomon Islands Thailand Timor-Leste

Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cameroon Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia

Page 6: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

4

Developed Region Southern Asia Caucasus and Central Asia

Eastern Asia Latin America and

the Caribbean North Africa and

Middle East South-eastern

Asia and Oceania Sub-Saharan Africa

Malta Monaco Montenegro Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Russian Federation San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Ukraine United Kingdom United States of America

Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Suriname Trinidad and Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)

Tonga Tuvalu Vanuatu Viet Nam

Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia South Africa South Sudan Sudan Swaziland Togo Uganda United Republic of Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe

Page 7: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

5

Data inputs

Strategy for systematic searches of the published literature Databases searched: Pubmed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science (LILACS), and WHO

regional databases (Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office [EMRO] Index Medicus, African Index

Medicus, Pan American Health Organization [PAHO] Latin America and Caribbean Virtual Health

Library, South East Asian Region [SEARO] Index Medicus, and Western Pacific Region [WPRO] Index

Medicus.

Search terms: (("stillbirth"[MeSH Terms] OR "stillbirth"[All Fields] OR ("still"[All Fields] AND "birth"[All Fields]) OR

"still birth"[All Fields]) OR ("foetal death"[All Fields] OR "fetal death"[MeSH Terms] OR ("fetal"[All

Fields] AND "death"[All Fields]) OR "fetal death"[All Fields]) OR ("perinatal mortality"[MeSH Terms]

OR ("perinatal"[All Fields] AND "mortality"[All Fields]) OR "perinatal mortality"[All Fields])) AND

(timing[All Fields] OR rate[All Fields] OR "epidemiology"[Subheading] OR "epidemiology"[All Fields]

OR "prevalence"[All Fields] OR "prevalence"[MeSH Terms] OR "incidence"[All Fields] OR

"incidence"[MeSH Terms])

AND

("Developing Countries"[Mesh] OR "developing country"[All Fields] OR "developing countries"[All Fields] OR "developing nation"[All Fields] OR "developing nations"[All Fields] OR "under-developed country"[All Fields] OR "under-developed countries"[All Fields] OR "under developed country"[All Fields] OR "under developed countries"[All Fields] OR "under-developed nations"[All Fields] OR "under developed nations"[All Fields] OR "third world country"[All Fields] OR "third world countries"[All Fields] OR "third world nation"[All Fields] OR "third world nations"[All Fields] OR "less developed country"[All Fields] OR "less developed countries"[All Fields] OR "less-developed country"[All Fields] OR "less-developed countries"[All Fields] OR "less developed nations"[All Fields] OR "less-developed nations"[All Fields] OR "Low Resource Setting" [All Fields] OR "Low Resource Settings"[All Fields] OR “Poor countries” OR “Poor nations” OR “Poor country” OR “Poor nation” OR “LMIC” OR “Resource poor setting” OR “Resource poor country” OR “Resource poor nation”) OR (“Countries, Developing” OR “Country, Developing” OR “Developing Country” OR “Least Developed Country” OR “Countries, Least Developed” OR “Country, Least Developed” OR “Developed Countries, Least” OR “Developed Country, Least” OR “Least Developed Country” OR “Less-Developed Country” OR “Countries, Less-Developed” OR “Country, Less-Developed” OR “Less Developed Countries” OR “Less-Developed Country” OR “Under-developed Nations” OR “Nation, Under-Developed” OR “Under Developed Nations” OR “Under-Developed Nation” OR “Third-World Countries” OR “Countries, Third-World” OR “Country, Third-World” OR “Third World Countries” OR “Third-World Country” OR “Third-World Nations” OR “Nation, Third-World” OR “Nations, Third World” OR “Third World Nations” OR “Third-World Nation” OR “Under-Developed Countries” OR “Countries, Under-Developed” OR “Country, Under-Developed” OR “Under Developed Countries” OR “Under-Developed Country” OR “Developing Nations” OR “Nations, Developing” OR “Less-Developed Nations” OR “Less Developed Nations” OR “Less-Developed Nation” OR “Nation, Less-Developed” OR “Nations, Less-Developed”) OR (“Low income countries” OR “Low income country” OR “Low income nations” OR “Low income nation” OR “Middle income countries” OR “Middle income nations” OR “Middle income country” OR “Middle income nation” OR (“Africa” OR “Africa South of the Sahara” OR “Sub-Saharan Africa” OR “Asia” or “South America” OR “Central America” OR “Latin America” OR “Polynesia” OR “Middle East” OR “South East Asia”) OR “Africa” OR “Africa South of the Sahara” OR “Sub-Saharan Africa” OR “Asia” or “South America” OR “Central America”

Page 8: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

6

OR “Latin America” OR “Polynesia” OR “Middle East” OR “South East Asia”) OR (“Afghanistan” OR “Bangladesh” OR “Benin” OR “Burkina Faso” OR “Burundi” OR “Cambodia” OR “Central African Republic” OR “Chad” OR “Comoros” OR “Democratic Republic of Congo” OR “Democratic Republic of the Congo” OR (“Democratic” AND “Republic” AND “Congo”) OR “Zaire” OR “Eritrea” OR “Ethiopia” OR “Gambia” OR “Guinea” OR “Guinea-bissau” OR (“guinea” AND “Bissau”) OR “guinea Bissau” OR “guinea-bisau” OR (“guinea” AND “bisau”) OR “guinea bisau” OR “Haiti” OR “Haïti” OR “Kenya” OR (“Democratic” AND “Korea”) OR “North Korea” OR “DPRK” OR “Kyrgyz Republic” OR “Kyrgyzstan” OR “Liberia” OR “Madagascar” OR “Malawi” OR “Mali” OR “Mozambique” OR “Myanmar” OR “Burma” OR “Nepal” OR “Niger” OR “Rwanda” OR “Sierra Leone” OR “Somalia” OR “South Sudan” OR “Tajikistan” OR “Tanzania” OR “Togo” OR “Uganda” OR “Zimbabwe”) OR (“Armenia” OR “Bhutan” OR “Bolivia” OR “Cameroon” OR “Cape Verde” OR (“Republic of Congo”) OR “Cote d’Ivoire” OR “Côte d’Ivoire” OR “Ivory Coast” OR “Djibouti” OR “Egypt” OR “Arab Republic of Egypt” OR “El Salvador” OR (“Georgia (republic)” OR “Georgia Republic” OR “Republic of Georgia” NOT “Atlanta, Georgia”) OR “Ghana” OR “Guatemala” OR “Guyana” OR “Honduras” OR “Indonesia” OR “India” OR “Kiribati” OR “Kosovo” OR “Lao PDR” OR “Laos” OR “Lesotho” OR “Mauritania” OR “Micronesia” OR (“Federated” AND “States” AND “Micronesia”) OR “Moldova” OR (“Republic” AND “Moldova”) OR “Mongolia” OR “Morocco” OR “Nicaragua” OR “Nigeria” OR “Pakistan” OR “Papua New Guinea” OR “Paraguay” OR “Philippines” OR (“Samoa” NOT “American Samoa”) OR “Sao Tome” OR “São Tomé” (“Sao” AND “Tome” AND “Principe”) OR (“São” AND “Tomé” AND “Príncipe”) OR “Senegal” OR “Solomon Islands” OR “Sri Lanka” OR “Sudan” OR “Swaziland” OR “Syria” OR “Syrian Arab Republic” OR “East Timor” OR (“East” AND “Timor”) OR “Timor Leste” OR “Timor-Leste” OR (“Timor” AND “Leste”) OR “Ukraine” OR “Uzbekistan” OR “Vanuatu” OR “Vietnam” OR “Viet Nam” OR “West Bank and Gaza” OR “Yemen” OR “Republic of Yemen” OR “Yemen Republic” OR “Zambia”) OR (“Angola” OR “Albania” OR “Algeria” OR “American Samoa” OR “Argentina” OR “Azerbaijan” OR “Belarus” OR “Byelarus” OR “Belize” OR “Bosnia” OR (“Bosnia” AND “Herzegovina”) OR “Botswana” OR “Brazil” OR “Bulgaria” OR “China” OR “Colombia” OR “Costa Rica” OR “Cuba” OR “Dominica” OR “Dominican Republic” OR “Ecuador” OR “Fiji” OR “Gabon” OR “Grenada” OR “Hungary” OR “Iran” OR “Islamic Republic of Iran” OR “Iraq” OR “Jamaica” OR “Jordan” OR “Kazakhstan” OR “Lebanon” OR “Libya” OR “Republic of Macedonia” OR “Macedonia” OR “Macedonia Republic” OR “FYR of Macedonia” OR “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” OR “Macedonia (Republic)” OR (“Macedonia” AND “(Republic)”) OR “Malaysia” OR “Maldives” OR “Indian Ocean Islands” OR “Marshall Islands” OR “Mauritius” OR (“Mexico” NOT “New Mexico”) OR “Montenegro” OR “Namibia” OR “Palau” OR “Panama” OR “Peru” OR “Romania” OR “Serbia” OR (“Serbia” AND “Montenegro”) OR “Seychelles” OR “South Africa” OR “St. Lucia” OR “St Lucia” OR “Saint Lucia” OR “Saint Vincent and the Grenadines” OR “St Vincent and the Grenadines” OR “Suriname” OR “Surinam” OR “Thailand” OR “Tonga” OR “Tunisia” OR “Turkey” OR “Turkmenistan” OR “Tuvalu” OR “Venezuela”)

Page 9: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

7

Flow figure for updated systematic review

Exclusion criteria:

1. No data on intrapartum or stillbirth rates 2. Data only on specific sub-population (eg high risk diabetics, one particular ethnic minority,

high risk deliveries only in tertiary hospital) 3. <50 pregnant women 4. Duplicate publications 5. Median year of data collection prior to 1990 or unknown 6. Country has good national routine data available

(Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Bulgaria, Canada,

Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany,

Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania,

Luxembourg, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Philippines, Poland,

Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent

and the Grenadines, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, The

former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Trinidad and Tobago, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of

America, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of).)

All databases after exclusion of duplicates:

n= 683 from 1st January, 1990 to 31st

December, 1994

n= 1293 from 1st September, 2010 to

19th January 2015

After screening: n=123

Included: n=33

16 excluded, were pre-1990

10 excluded, had <12 months

data

30 excluded, had no SBR or

IPSBR from general pop

7 excluded, were duplicate

4 excluded, were from country

with good national data

7 excluded, were unable to get

paper/translate paper to English

16 excluded, had <50 pregnant

women included

Page 10: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

8

Eight studies included in the previous estimates were excluded in this round of estimates as our inclusion criteria for SBR:NMR ratio were more conservative. Groups and listserves used to identify contacts with possible population based stillbirth data: MHFT, HNN, Child2015, BetterCare together.

SBR:NMR quality criteria As detailed in the main paper, we used SBR(28weeks):NMR ratio as a quality criteria and excluded

data sources not meeting this criteria. This quality criteria was chosen as it was available across most

data sources, and would be expected not show large fluctuations across settings over time.

However, even in high-income settings this is affected by some misclassification of stillbirth versus

neonatal deaths,1 and this may be even greater in LMIC as evidenced by the reduction in stillbirth

rates associated with the ‘Helping Babies Breathe’ program in Tanzania where fresh stillbirths were

reduced by 24% (95%CI:10 – 36%), and with resuscitation training in 6 LMIC countries where overall

stillbirth rates were reduced by 31% (95%CI:21-46%).2,3

Table limitations of SBR28:NMR ratio as quality criteria: Scenarios shown in the table below highlight situations in which the stillbirth to neonatal mortality

rate ratio may be affected by different scenarios.

Scenario Effect on SBR(GA28):NMR ratio

Low capture of neonatal deaths or better stillbirth

capture eg weaker HMIS, CRVS, facility studies

Small population with large year on year variation

of both SBR and NMR – reporting large number of

stillbirths in given year

Misclassification of neonatal deaths as fresh

stillbirths

Increased

Low capture of both neonatal deaths and stillbirths Within normal range

Under-capture of stillbirths> under-capture of

neonatal deaths

Small population with large year on year variation

of both SBR and NMR – reporting large number of

neonatal deaths in given year

Misclassification of fresh stillbirths as neonatal

deaths

Decreased

Trends in SBR:NMR ratio in HIC countries Ability to track the SBR28:NMR ratio over time is hampered by several factors, including :

Page 11: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

9

1) Gestational age was not routinely assessed in most settings until @30 years ago, and

reporting was therefore based on birthweight

2) Neonatal mortality was also rarely separated out from infant mortality before 1970s-1980s,

when the relative important contribution of neonatal mortality to infant mortality when

recognised (corresponding also with the development of neonatal medicine as a sub-

specialty)

Historical data located during the course of the searches under-taken for these estimates was used

to demonstrate the association between SBR:NMR ratio over time.

The figure A below shows the relationship between SBR (measured as ≥1000g) and NMR in 5 Nordic

Countries from 1975 to 2012. A gradual increase in the ratio over this period as neonatal mortality is

reduced at a more rapid rate that stillbirth rates. Data using the 28 week definition were not

available for the full time series, however based on our analysis, it would be expected that the

SBR28:NMR ratio would follow a similar trend, with slightly higher ratios. Data for England and

Wales for 1980 to 1992 using the 28 week definition however reported only a very slight increase

from 0.94 to 1.05.

Figure A:

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

SBR

10

00

g:N

MR

rat

io

SBR1000:NMR ratio in 5 Nordic Countries 1975 to 2012

Denmark

Finland

Iceland

Norway

Sweden

Page 12: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

10

Figure B: SBR:NMR ratio versus NMR for 5 Nordic countries

From these five Nordic countries when plotting the sbr:nmr ratio versus the overall reported nmr

that the ratio remains around 1 – 1.5, until the NMR reaches very low level (around 3 per 1,000

livebirths). These data as to the changing ratio do not support the addition of an upper ratio limit for

high income/ low mortality settings.

SBR:NMR ratio in higher mortality settings High quality stillbirth rate data are lacking from most high mortality settings. We examined

relationship of stillbirth rates with neonatal mortality over time from England and Wales, where

stillbirth rate (late fetal death) and neonatal rate data are available annually from 1927-1991.

12

34

56

0 2 4 6nmr

ratio predicted ratio

Page 13: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

11

Figure C: showing relationship with sbr:nmr ratio as England and Wales transition from a high

neonatal mortality to a low neonatal mortality setting.

This graph shows very little variation in sbr:nmr ratio in the NMR range 10 – 35 per 1,000 livebirths,

with ratios between 1 and 1.4.

Figure D: Scatter plot of the relationship between SBR:NMR ratio by NMR for all available

‘population based’ LMIC data

11.2

1.4

1.6

0 10 20 30 40nmr

01

23

SB

R2

8 to

natio

na

l N

MR

0 20 40 60 80nmr_final

Page 14: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

12

Input data meeting inclusion criteria included N=2207 Classified by study type/ quality criteria:

1=High quality national routine information system data

2=Lower quality national routine information system data

3= Nationally representative retrospective household surveys

4= Sub-national population based

5=Sub-national other

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Afghanistan Dott 2004 500g NG 45.9 5

Afghanistan DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 402 20.6 3

Afghanistan WHOMCS 2011 1000g 468 23.1 5

Albania DHS survey 2005 28 weeks 6 3.8 3

Albania Ministry of Health 2010 22 weeks NG 4.2 2

Algeria National Statistical Office 1990 Not defined NG 21.4 2

Algeria National Statistical Office 2000 Not defined NG 24.7 2

Algeria WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 111 19.5 5

Algeria WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 244 25.7 4

Algeria National Statistical Office 2008 Not defined NG 19.9 2

Algeria National Statistical Office 2009 Not defined NG 18.4 2

Algeria National Statistical Office 2010 Not defined NG 18.2 2

Algeria National Statistical Office 2011 Not defined NG 16.7 2

Algeria National Statistical Office 2012 Not defined NG 15.9 2

Algeria National Statistical Office 2013 Not defined NG 15.4 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 1999 Not defined 5 5.9 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2000 Not defined 1 1.3 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2001 Not defined 1 1.3 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2002 Not defined 0 0.0 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2003 Not defined 3 4.0 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2004 Not defined 5 6.1 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2005 Not defined 0 0.0 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2006 Not defined 1 1.2 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2007 Not defined 0 0.0 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2008 Not defined 2 2.3 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2009 Not defined 3 3.6 2

Andorra Eurozone WHO 2010 Not defined 0 0.0 2

Angola WHO Global Survey 2005 1000g 169 30.5 4

Argentina consultation 1995 1000g NG 8.3 1

Argentina consultation 1996 1000g NG 8.2 1

Argentina consultation 1997 1000g NG 7.3 1

Argentina consultation 1998 1000g NG 7.5 1

Argentina consultation 1999 1000g NG 7.5 1

Page 15: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

13

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Argentina National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 5108 7.2 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 4833 7.0 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 4850 6.9 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 4663 6.6 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 4409 6.0 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 3812 5.3 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 3773 5.4 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 3736 5.3 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 3898 5.2 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 3920 5.2 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 3429 4.5 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 3527 4.6 1

Argentina National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 3731 5.0 1

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1990 Not defined 1313 16.2 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1991 Not defined 1295 16.4 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1992 Not defined 1046 14.6 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1993 Not defined 874 14.6 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1994 Not defined 733 14.1 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1996 Not defined NG 13.7 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1997 Not defined NG 12.9 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1998 Not defined NG 12.3 2

Armenia DHS survey 1998 28 weeks NG 14.9 3

Armenia Eurozone WHO 1999 Not defined NG 14.3 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 2000 Not defined NG 13.7 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 2001 Not defined NG 12.5 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 2002 Not defined NG 12.7 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 2003 Not defined NG 19.4 2

Armenia DHS survey 2003 28 weeks NG 7.9 3

Armenia Eurozone WHO 2004 Not defined NG 18.1 2

Armenia Eurozone WHO 2005 500g NG 17.4 2

Armenia Armenia Demographic Handbook 2006 500g 662 17.3 2

Armenia Armenia Demographic Handbook 2007 500g 563 13.8 2

Armenia DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 8 5.5 3

Armenia Armenia Demographic Handbook 2008 500g 601 14.4 2

Armenia Armenia Demographic Handbook 2009 500g 802 17.7 2

Armenia Armenia Demographic Handbook 2010 500g 844 18.5 2

Armenia Armenia Demographic Handbook 2011 500g 850 19.2 2

Armenia Armenia Demographic Handbook 2012 500g 808 18.7 2

Armenia Armenia Demographic Handbook 2013 500g 711 16.7 2

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 1992 20 weeks 1767 6.7 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 1993 20 weeks 1665 6.4 1

Page 16: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

14

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 1994 20 weeks 1745 6.7 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 1995 1000g NG 3.8 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 1996 1000g NG 3.4 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 1997 1000g NG 3.4 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 1998 1000g NG 3.5 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 1999 1000g NG 3.3 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2000 28 weeks 880 3.4 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2001 1000g NG 3.1 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2002 1000g NG 2.9 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2003 1000g NG 3.1 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2004 28 weeks 797 3.1 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2005 28 weeks 826 3.1 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2006 28 weeks 859 3.1 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2007 28 weeks 849 2.9 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2008 28 weeks 883 3.0 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2009 28 weeks 926 3.1 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2010 28 weeks 907 3.1 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2011 28 weeks 846 2.8 1

Australia National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) 2012 28 weeks 902 2.9 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1990 1000g 325 3.6 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1991 1000g 321 3.4 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1992 1000g 339 3.5 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1993 1000g 317 3.3 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1994 1000g 307 3.3 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1995 1000g 389 4.4 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1996 1000g 399 4.5 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1997 1000g 363 4.3 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1998 1000g 334 4.1 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 1999 1000g 316 4.0 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2000 1000g 331 4.2 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2001 1000g 278 3.7 1

Page 17: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

15

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2002 1000g 338 4.3 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2003 1000g 307 4.0 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2004 1000g 313 3.9 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2005 1000g 289 3.7 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2006 1000g 313 4.0 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2007 1000g 291 3.8 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2008 1000g 258 3.3 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2009 1000g 284 3.7 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2010 1000g 296 3.7 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2011 1000g 294 3.7 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2012 1000g 260 3.3 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2013 1000g 272 3.4 1

Austria MOH National Statistical Office 2014 1000g 273 3.3 1

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 1998 500g NG 13.6 2

Azerbaijan DHS survey 1998 28 weeks 68 22.0 3

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2000 500g NG 13.1 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2001 500g NG 14.2 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2002 500g NG 12.8 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2003 500g NG 12.6 2

Azerbaijan DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 37 15.9 3

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2004 500g NG 12.5 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2005 500g NG 11.3 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2006 500g NG 11.2 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2007 500g NG 11.9 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2008 500g NG 11.8 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2009 500g 1719 11.2 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2010 500g 2054 12.2 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2011 500g 1988 11.2 2

Azerbaijan Eurozone WHO 2012 500g 2108 11.9 2

Bahamas vital statistics report 2006 1996 22 weeks NG 12.9 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2007 1997 22 weeks NG 12.3 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2008 1998 22 weeks NG 4.4 2

Bahamas vital statistics report 2009 1999 22 weeks NG 14.0 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2010 2000 22 weeks NG 11.9 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2011 2001 22 weeks NG 9.5 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2012 2002 22 weeks NG 10.4 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2013 2003 22 weeks NG 17.8 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2014 2004 22 weeks NG 18.6 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2009 2005 22 weeks 86 15.3 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2009 2006 22 weeks 72 13.4 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2009 2007 22 weeks 83 14.0 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2009 2008 22 weeks 82 14.7 1

Bahamas vital statistics report 2009 2009 22 weeks 74 13.6 1

Page 18: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

16

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Bahrain National Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks NG 11.0 2

Bahrain National Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks NG 12.0 2

Bahrain National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks NG 8.7 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks NG 10.8 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks NG 8.6 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks NG 10.0 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks NG 8.7 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks NG 9.8 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks NG 7.2 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks NG 8.2 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks NG 7.4 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks NG 6.2 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks NG 6.8 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks NG 6.6 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 95 5.3 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 104 5.7 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 140 7.9 1

Bahrain National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 125 6.5 1

Bangladesh Matlab 1991 1000g 96 34.8 4

Bangladesh Matlab 1992 1000g 95 34.8 4

Bangladesh Matlab 1993 1000g 102 34.7 4

Bangladesh Matlab 1994 1000g 90 33.9 4

Bangladesh McCord 1995 Not defined NG 80.3 5

Bangladesh DHS survey 1995 1000g NG 32.5 3

Bangladesh Matlab 1995 1000g 92 32.4 4

Bangladesh Matlab 1997 1000g 87 31.6 4

Bangladesh DHS survey 1998 1000g NG 28.3 3

Bangladesh Matlab 1998 1000g 82 29.2 4

Bangladesh Matlab 1999 1000g 76 28.4 4

Bangladesh Matlab 2000 1000g 77 27.9 4

Bangladesh Azad 2001 1000g 266 70.9 5

Bangladesh Matlab 2001 1000g 81 27.9 4

Bangladesh DHS survey 2002 1000g 269 37.0 3

Bangladesh Matlab 2002 1000g 78 26.8 4

Bangladesh Cherry 2002 Not defined NG 34.1 4

Bangladesh Matlab 2003 1000g 75 26.7 4

Bangladesh Matlab 2004 1000g 90 36.1 4

Bangladesh Baqui 2004 1000g 1748 36.3 4

Bangladesh West (JiVitA) 2004 1000g 703 47.9 4

Bangladesh DHS survey 2005 1000g 175 28.1 3

Bangladesh Matlab 2005 1000g 71 26.5 4

Bangladesh Matlab 2005 1000g 96 35.4 4

Bangladesh Matlab 2006 1000g 60 20.1 4

Page 19: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

17

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Bangladesh Matlab 2006 1000g 62 23.6 4

Bangladesh Prost 2006 22 weeks 521 34.1 4

Bangladesh Azad 2006 1000g NG 34.3 4

Bangladesh Ellis 2006.

5 1000g 1068 33.4 4

Bangladesh Matlab 2007.

5 1000g 49 19.2 4

Bangladesh Day 2008 1000g 131 37.5 5

Bangladesh DHS survey 2008 1000g 232 25.7 3

Bangladesh Shah 2008 28 weeks 1443 38.6 4

Bangladesh Matlab 2008.

5 1000g 52 19.1 4

Bangladesh Nahar 2008.

5 1000g 574 25.8 4

Bangladesh Day 2009 1000g 128 41.6 5

Bangladesh Sikder 2009 Not defined 1216 44.2 4

Bangladesh Matlab 2009.

5 1000g 48 18.5 4

Bangladesh Day 2010 1000g 123 36.6 5

Bangladesh Matlab 2010 1000g 44 17.0 4

Bangladesh Prost 2010 22 weeks 232 26.3 4

Bangladesh West (JiVitA-3) 2010 28 weeks 716 48.2 4

Bangladesh Day 2011 1000g 128 33.1 5

Bangladesh HMIS 2011 Not defined 17868 29.5 2

Bangladesh Matlab 2011 1000g 31 11.6 4

Bangladesh Owais 2011 Not defined 44 18.1 4

Bangladesh Day 2012 1000g 121 32.9 5

Bangladesh HMIS 2012 Not defined 18904 28.5 2

Bangladesh Matlab 2012 1000g 29 11.0 4

Bangladesh Day 2013 1000g 114 31.3 5

Bangladesh HMIS 2013 Not defined 16974 27.9 2

Bangladesh Matlab 2013 1000g 28 10.7 4

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 1990 1000g 954 6.7 2

Belarus Eurozone WHO 1993 500g 1151 9.7 2

Belarus Eurozone WHO 1994 500g 1032 9.2 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 1995 1000g 645 6.3 2

Belarus Eurozone WHO 1995 500g NG 8.6 2

Belarus Eurozone WHO 1996 500g NG 7.2 2

Belarus Eurozone WHO 1997 500g NG 7.4 2

Belarus Eurozone WHO 1998 500g NG 6.7 2

Belarus Eurozone WHO 1999 500g NG 6.1 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2000 1000g 404 4.3 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2001 1000g 423 4.6 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2002 1000g 354 4.0 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2003 1000g 325 3.7 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2004 1000g 322 3.6 2

Page 20: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

18

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2005 500g 465 5.1 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2006 500g 472 4.9 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2007 500g 407 3.9 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2008 500g 386 3.6 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2009 500g 358 3.3 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2010 500g 296 2.7 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2011 500g 275 2.5 2

Belarus Demographic yearbook 2013 2012 500g 275 2.4 2

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1990 28 weeks 677 5.4 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1991 28 weeks 642 5.1 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1992 28 weeks 648 5.2 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1993 28 weeks 604 5.0 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1994 28 weeks 507 4.3 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1995 28 weeks 578 5.0 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1996 28 weeks 542 4.6 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1997 28 weeks 545 4.7 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1998 22 weeks 512 4.5 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 1999 22 weeks 487 4.3 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2000 22 weeks 488 4.2 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2001 22 weeks 473 4.1 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2002 22 weeks 486 4.3 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2003 22 weeks 516 4.6 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2004 22 weeks 488 4.2 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2005 22 weeks 466 3.9 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2006 22 weeks 497 4.1 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2007 22 weeks 516 4.1 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2008 22 weeks 573 4.5 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2009 22 weeks 660 5.2 1

Belgium Eurozone WHO 2010 22 weeks 646 4.9 1

Benin Denoeud 2005 500g NG 46.7 5

Benin MOH report 2009 Not defined 5612 22.9 2

Benin MOH report 2010 Not defined 6487 24.4 2

Benin MOH report 2011 Not defined 7277 25.1 2

Benin MOH report 2012 Not defined 7490 23.9 2

Benin MOH report 2013 Not defined 7129 22.6 2

Bolivia DHS survey 2001 28 weeks 123 11.7 3

Bolivia DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 98 11.1 3

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1990 1000g NG 8.7 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1991 1000g NG 9.2 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1992 1000g NG 4.7 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1993 1000g NG 11.2 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1994 1000g NG 7.0 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1995 1000g NG 16.3 5

Page 21: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

19

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1996 1000g NG 13.0 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1997 1000g NG 11.3 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Demografska statistika Demographics 2008 1997 28 weeks 167 4.8 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1998 1000g NG 9.7 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Demografska statistika Demographics 2008 1998 28 weeks 146 4.6 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 1999 1000g NG 7.1 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Demografska statistika Demographics 2008 1999 28 weeks 154 5.5 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina FATUSIC 1999 1000g NG 10.5 4

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 2000 1000g NG 11.7 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2000 28 weeks 159 4.0 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 2001 1000g NG 7.0 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2001 28 weeks 193 5.1 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina SKOKIC 2001 500g NG 7.7 4

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 2002 1000g NG 6.2 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2002 28 weeks 138 3.9 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 2003 1000g NG 6.6 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2003 28 weeks 150 4.2 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 2004 1000g NG 6.1 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2004 28 weeks 168 4.8 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Fatusic 2005 1000g NG 5.6 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2005 28 weeks 147 4.2 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2006 28 weeks 160 4.7 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2007 28 weeks 174 5.1 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2008 28 weeks 171 5.0 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2009 28 weeks 136 3.9 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2010 28 weeks 143 4.2 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2011 28 weeks 118 3.7 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2012 28 weeks 120 3.7 2

Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013 28 weeks 102 3.3 2

Botswana Health Statistics Report 2009 2009 28 weeks 731 15.0 2

Botswana Vital Stats 2011 28 weeks 498 12.5 2

Brazil MOH webportal 1994 1000g 37172 14.2 2

Page 22: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

20

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Brazil MOH webportal 1995 1000g 41799 14.6 2

Brazil MOH webportal 1996 500g 40434 13.5 2

Brazil Duarte 1996 500g NG 22.7 4

Brazil National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks NG 9.5 2

Brazil MOH webportal 1997 500g 41473 13.5 2

Brazil Nurdan 1997 500g NG 15.9 4

Brazil MOH webportal 1998 500g 40321 12.6 2

Brazil MOH webportal 1999 500g 40824 12.4 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks NG 7.3 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2000 500g 39429 12.1 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks NG 7.3 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2001 500g 38759 12.3 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks NG 7.0 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2002 500g 37417 12.1 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2003 500g 37129 12.1 2

Brazil WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 71 6.9 5

Brazil MOH webportal 2004 500g 36214 11.8 2

Brazil WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 20 4.3 4

Brazil BARROS 2004 1000g NG 9.9 4

Brazil Amorim 2005 500g 135 33.4 5

Brazil National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks NG 5.5 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2005 500g 34233 11.2 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks NG 5.6 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2006 500g 33434 11.2 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks NG 5.5 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2007 500g 32165 11.0 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks NG 5.6 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2008 500g 32065 10.8 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks NG 5.6 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2009 500g 32147 11.0 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 16736 5.6 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2010 500g 30929 10.7 2

Brazil INTERGROWTH-21 2010 28 weeks 52 7.7 4

Brazil WHOMCS 2011 1000g 18 5.2 5

Brazil National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 17595 5.7 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2011 500g 31613 10.7 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 18053 5.9 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2012 500g 32229 11.0 2

Brazil National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 17812 5.9 2

Brazil MOH webportal 2013 500g 31818 10.8 2

Brunei Darussalam consultation: MoH 1995 24 weeks NG 8.1 2

Brunei Darussalam consultation: MoH 1996 24 weeks NG 7.4 2

Brunei Darussalam consultation: MoH 1997 24 weeks NG 5.2 2

Page 23: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

21

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Brunei Darussalam consultation: MoH 1998 24 weeks NG 6.2 2

Brunei Darussalam consultation: MoH 1999 24 weeks NG 5.8 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2000 24 weeks NG 6.5 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2001 24 weeks NG 6.9 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2002 24 weeks NG 6.7 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2003 24 weeks NG 6.8 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2004 24 weeks NG 6.0 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2005 24 weeks NG 6.1 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2006 24 weeks NG 4.6 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2007 24 weeks NG 6.3 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2008 24 weeks NG 6.4 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2009 24 weeks NG 4.8 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2010 24 weeks NG 5.5 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2011 24 weeks NG 3.7 2

Brunei Darussalam Health Information Booklet 2012 24 weeks NG 3.9 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 1990 1000g 641 6.1 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 1995 1000g 458 6.3 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 1996 1000g 555 7.6 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 1997 1000g 492 6.2 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 1998 1000g 484 7.5 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 1999 1000g 490 7.4 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2000 1000g 555 7.5 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2001 1000g 500 7.3 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2002 1000g 539 8.0 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2003 1000g 549 8.1 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2004 1000g 547 7.8 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2005 1000g 565 7.9 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2006 1000g 517 6.9 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2007 1000g 566 7.5 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2008 1000g 571 7.3 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2009 1000g 538 6.6 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2010 1000g 479 6.3 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2011 1000g 443 6.2 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2012 1000g 412 5.9 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2013 1000g 358 5.3 2

Bulgaria National Statistical Institute 2014 1000g 367 5.4 2

Burkina Faso Chalumeau - Moma trial 1995 22 weeks NG 20.9 4

Burkina Faso DHS survey 2001 28 weeks 166 15.1 3

Burkina Faso Annuaires statistique sante 2003 Not defined 6141 22.3 2

Burkina Faso Roberfroid 2005 Not defined 26 20.6 4

Burkina Faso Lindert 2007 Not defined 5 25.3 5

Burkina Faso Annuaires statistique sante 2011 Not defined 13473 23.4 2

Burkina Faso Annuaires statistique sante 2012 Not defined 13645 21.9 2

Page 24: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

22

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Burkina Faso Annuaires statistique sante 2013 Not defined 13011 21.5 2

Burundi DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 159 19.5 3

Cambodia WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 47 22.8 5

Cambodia DHS survey 2008 28 weeks 72 8.7 3

Cambodia WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 34 9.9 4

Cambodia WHOMCS 2010 1000g 64 15.9 5

Canada Statistics Canada 1991 20 weeks 2294 5.7 1

Canada Statistics Canada 1992 20 weeks 2520 6.3 1

Canada Statistics Canada 1993 20 weeks 2335 6.0 1

Canada Consultation 1995 1000g NG 3.6 1

Canada Consultation 1996 1000g NG 3.5 1

Canada Consultation 1997 1000g NG 3.5 1

Canada Consultation 1998 1000g NG 3.2 1

Canada Consultation 1999 1000g NG 3.3 1

Canada Consultation updated 2000 1000g 642 3.2 1

Canada Consultation updated 2001 1000g 681 3.4 1

Canada Consultation updated 2002 1000g 619 3.1 1

Canada Consultation updated 2003 1000g 616 3.0 1

Canada Consultation updated 2004 1000g 620 3.0 1

Canada Consultation updated 2005 1000g 625 3.0 1

Canada Consultation updated 2006 1000g 668 3.1 1

Canada Consultation updated 2007 1000g 713 3.1 1

Canada Consultation updated 2008 1000g 733 3.1 1

Canada Consultation updated 2009 1000g 757 3.2 1

Canada Consultation updated 2010 1000g 869 3.7 1

Cape Verde DHS survey 1995 28 weeks 87 20.2 3

Cape Verde DHS survey 2002 28 weeks 21 9.4 3

Chad MOH report 2012 Not defined 3119 30.0 2

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1990 All 1789 5.8 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1991 All 1754 5.8 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1992 All 1667 5.6 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1993 All 1535 5.3 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1994 All 1321 4.6 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1995 All 1277 4.6 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1996 All 1244 4.5 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1997 All 1240 4.6 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1998 All 1161 4.4 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 1999 All 1080 4.2 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2000 All 1116 4.4 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2001 All 1278 5.1 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2002 All 1197 4.9 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2003 All 1404 5.9 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2004 All 1510 6.5 1

Page 25: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

23

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2005 All 1841 7.9 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2006 28 weeks 928 4.0 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2007 28 weeks 894 3.7 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2008 28 weeks 891 3.6 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2009 28 weeks 1046 4.1 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2010 28 weeks 918 3.6 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2011 28 weeks 858 3.4 1

Chile Estadisticas vitales informe annual 2012 28 weeks 846 3.5 1

China consultation: MoH 1996 1000g NG 13.3 2

China Wen 1997 500g NG 15.0 5

China Wu 1999 1000g 76 24.0 4

China consultation: MoH 2000 1000g NG 12.9 2

China Zeng 2003 28 weeks 99 30.6 4

China Xu 2004.

5 Not defined 211 10.3 5

China Xu 2004.

5 20 weeks 210 10.3 4

China Xu 2004.

5 20 weeks 193 47.2 4

China Liu 2007.

5 28 weeks 28 4.7 4

China WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 48 3.8 4

China consultation: MoH 2009 1000g NG 10.3 2

China Sun 2010 22 weeks 241 3.9 4

China China NMNSS 2013 28 weeks 20200 12.8 5

China Zhong 2013 28 weeks NG 3.3 4

China China NMNSS 2013 28 weeks 3398 7.0 4

China China NMNSS 2013 28 weeks 14257 7.5 4

Colombia National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks 5972 8.2 2

Colombia DHS survey 1998 28 weeks 53 11.5 3

Colombia National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks 6150 8.2 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 4774 6.3 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 5705 7.8 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 5422 7.7 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 7102 9.9 2

Colombia DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 91 6.6 3

Colombia National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 7679 10.5 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 9675 13.3 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 11431 15.7 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 3904 5.5 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 3948 5.5 2

Colombia DHS survey 2008 28 weeks 86 5.4 3

Colombia National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 3801 5.4 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 3448 5.2 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 3503 5.2 2

Page 26: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

24

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Colombia National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 4788 7.0 2

Colombia National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 5280 8.0 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 1992 Not defined 4 7.5 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 1993 Not defined 5 9.8 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 1994 Not defined 4 7.0 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 1995 Not defined 2 3.9 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 1996 Not defined 4 7.8 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 1997 Not defined 7 16.7 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 1998 Not defined 3 7.7 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 1999 Not defined 4 11.0 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2000 Not defined 4 12.8 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2001 Not defined 2 6.5 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2002 Not defined 2 6.8 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2003 Not defined 1 3.4 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2004 Not defined 3 9.5 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2005 Not defined 6 19.8 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2006 Not defined 3 9.7 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2007 Not defined 3 9.3 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2008 Not defined 3 10.1 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2009 Not defined 3 10.6 2

Cook Islands National Statistical Office 2010 Not defined 2 6.9 2

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 1995 22 weeks NG 8.6 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 1996 22 weeks NG 8.4 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 1997 22 weeks NG 7.9 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 1998 22 weeks NG 7.5 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 1999 22 weeks NG 6.9 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2000 22 weeks NG 6.8 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2001 22 weeks 510 7.0 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2002 22 weeks 465 6.5 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2003 22 weeks 471 6.6 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2004 22 weeks 524 7.1 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2005 22 weeks 503 6.6 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2006 22 weeks 549 7.3 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2007 22 weeks 446 6.2 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2008 22 weeks 528 7.1 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2009 22 weeks 517 7.0 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2010 22 weeks 496 6.9 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2011 22 weeks 471 6.4 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2012 22 weeks 491 6.7 1

Costa Rica National Statistical Office 2013 22 weeks 485 6.8 1

Cote d'Ivoire Chalumeau - Moma trial 1995 22 weeks NG 33.9 4

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1990 28 weeks 246 4.4 1

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1991 28 weeks 235 4.3 1

Page 27: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

25

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1992 28 weeks 215 4.3 1

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1993 28 weeks 199 4.1 1

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1994 28 weeks 221 4.5 1

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1995 28 weeks 215 4.3 1

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1996 28 weeks 235 4.4 1

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1997 28 weeks 253 4.6 1

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1998 28 weeks 225 4.8 1

Croatia 2013 statistical yearbook 1999 28 weeks 205 4.5 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2000 22 weeks 229 5.2 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2001 22 weeks 216 5.2 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2002 22 weeks 189 4.7 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2003 22 weeks 180 4.5 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2004 22 weeks 179 4.4 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2005 22 weeks 186 4.4 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2006 22 weeks 182 4.4 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2007 22 weeks 160 3.8 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2008 22 weeks 176 4.0 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2009 22 weeks 177 4.0 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2010 22 weeks 185 4.3 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2011 22 weeks 145 3.5 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2012 22 weeks 130 3.1 1

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 2013 22 weeks 144 3.6 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1990 28 weeks 1896 10.1 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1991 1000g 1891 10.8 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1992 28 weeks 1713 10.8 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1993 28 weeks 1695 11.0 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1994 28 weeks 1622 10.9 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks 1597 10.7 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks 1441 10.2 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks 1655 10.7 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks 1680 11.0 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks 1643 10.8 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 1629 11.2 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2001 500g 1982 14.1 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2002 500g 1983 13.8 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2003 500g 1868 13.5 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2004 500g 1675 13.0 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2005 500g 1639 13.4 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2006 500g 1438 12.8 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2007 500g 1395 12.3 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2008 500g 1513 12.2 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2009 500g 1460 11.1 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2010 500g 1344 10.4 1

Page 28: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

26

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Cuba National Statistical Office 2011 500g 1365 10.2 1

Cuba National Statistical Office 2012 500g 1262 9.9 1

Cyprus Perinatal Health Indicators 2007 28 weeks 8 3.6 2

Cyprus Perinatal Health Indicators 2008 28 weeks 7 2.9 2

Cyprus Perinatal Health Indicators 2009 28 weeks 8 2.7 2

Cyprus Perinatal Health Indicators 2010 28 weeks 14 4.2 2

Cyprus Perinatal Health Indicators 2011 28 weeks 15 4.3 2

Cyprus Perinatal Health Indicators 2012 28 weeks 13 3.2 2

Cyprus Perinatal Health Indicators 2012 22 weeks 42 4.1 2

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1990 1000g 530 4.0 2

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1991 1000g 496 3.8 2

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1992 1000g 437 3.6 2

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1993 1000g 445 3.7 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1994 1000g 336 3.1 2

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1995 1000g 300 3.1 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1996 1000g 317 3.5 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1997 1000g 273 3.0 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1998 1000g 294 3.2 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 1999 1000g 303 3.4 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2000 1000g 259 2.8 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2001 1000g 263 2.9 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2002 1000g 261 2.8 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2003 1000g 272 2.9 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2004 1000g 265 2.7 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2005 1000g 287 2.8 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2006 1000g 299 2.8 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2007 1000g 315 2.7 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2008 1000g 272 2.3 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2009 1000g 319 2.7 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2010 1000g 293 2.5 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2011 1000g 317 2.9 1

Czech Republic Czech Statistical Office - Population 2012 500g 379 3.5 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1990 1000g 264 4.1 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1991 1000g 263 4.1 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1992 1000g 297 4.4 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1993 1000g 283 4.2 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1994 1000g 281 4.0 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1995 1000g 280 4.0 1

Page 29: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

27

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1996 1000g 282 4.1 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1997 1000g 278 4.1 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1998 1000g 239 3.6 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 1999 1000g 231 3.5 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2000 1000g 186 2.7 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2001 1000g 210 3.2 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2002 1000g 184 2.9 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2003 1000g 205 3.2 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2004 1000g 145 2.2 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2005 1000g 160 2.5 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2006 1000g 150 2.3 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2007 1000g 148 2.3 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2008 1000g 137 2.1 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2009 1000g 120 1.9 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2010 1000g 115 1.8 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2011 1000g 102 1.7 1

Denmark Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries. 2012 1000g 106 1.8 1

Djibouti consultation: MoH 2009 Not defined NG 35.2 2

Dominican Republic DHS survey 2000 28 weeks 89 8.1 3

DR Congo WHO Global Survey 2005 1000g 12 28.6 5

DR Congo WHO Global Survey 2005 1000g 248 31.7 4

DR Congo McClure 2006 1000g 240 30.0 4

DR Congo McClure 2007.

5 1000g 355 24.8 4

DR Congo Ntambue 2010 1000g 177 15.2 4

DR Congo WHOMCS 2011 1000g 44 63.4 5

DR Congo WHOMCS 2011 1000g 163 30.5 4

Ecuador RHS 1994 28 weeks 3532 11.1 3

Ecuador DHS survey 1997 28 weeks 90 8.9 3

Ecuador DHS survey 2002 28 weeks 112 15.1 3

Ecuador WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 61 6.3 5

Ecuador WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 15 7.5 4

Ecuador National Statistical Office 2008 All 2006 6.8 2

Page 30: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

28

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Ecuador National Statistical Office 2009 All 1916 6.4 2

Ecuador WHOMCS 2010 1000g 10 7.2 5

Ecuador National Statistical Office 2010 All 1815 6.2 2

Ecuador WHOMCS 2010 1000g 42 9.4 4

Ecuador National Statistical Office 2011 All 1672 5.5 2

Ecuador National Statistical Office 2012 All 1717 5.7 2

Ecuador National Statistical Office 2013 All 1643 7.4 2

Egypt STANTON 1995 Not defined 34 17.5 3

Egypt DHS survey 1998 28 weeks 166 14.4 3

Egypt Campbell 1998 28 weeks NG 16.9 3

Egypt DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 129 9.4 3

Egypt DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 87 8.1 3

El Salvador DHS survey 1992 28 weeks 28 14.2 3

El Salvador DHS survey 1996 28 weeks 120 12.1 3

El Salvador DHS survey 2000 28 weeks 90 12.8 3

El Salvador DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 77 11.9 3

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 1992 28 weeks 140 7.7 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 1993 28 weeks 96 6.3 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 1994 28 weeks 97 6.9 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 1995 28 weeks 79 5.9 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 1996 28 weeks 73 5.5 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 1997 28 weeks 82 6.5 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 1998 28 weeks 79 6.5 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 1999 28 weeks 62 5.0 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2000 28 weeks 51 3.9 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2001 28 weeks 59 4.6 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2002 28 weeks 61 4.7 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2003 28 weeks 55 4.2 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2004 28 weeks 43 3.1 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2005 28 weeks 68 4.7 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2006 28 weeks 46 3.1 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2007 28 weeks 50 3.2 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2008 28 weeks 52 3.2 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2009 28 weeks 64 4.0 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2010 28 weeks 43 2.7 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2011 28 weeks 42 2.8 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2012 28 weeks 36 2.5 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2013 28 weeks 31 2.2 1

Estonia Estonian Birth Registry 2014 28 weeks 40 2.9 1

Ethiopia BERHANE 1998 1000g NG 19.0 4

Ethiopia berhan 2002 1000g NG 65.6 5

Ethiopia Yaya 2008 1000g 226 19.2 4

Ethiopia Bayou 2009 1000g 394 78.3 5

Page 31: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

29

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Ethiopia DHS survey 2009 28 weeks 204 16.9 3

Ethiopia Assefa 2009.

5 Not defined 27 20.4 4

Ethiopia Andargie 2010 Not defined 41 23.4 4

Ethiopia Adane 2013 1000g 34 71.0 5

Fiji MOH annual report 2003 1000g NG 8.9 2

Fiji MOH annual report 2004 1000g NG 11.2 2

Fiji MOH annual report 2005 1000g NG 11.6 2

Fiji MOH annual report 2009 1000g NG 9.0 2

Fiji MOH annual report 2010 1000g NG 8.3 2

Fiji MOH annual report 2011 1000g NG 12.4 2

Fiji MOH annual report 2012 1000g NG 10.9 2

Fiji MOH annual report 2013 1000g NG 9.0 2

Finland Consultation 1990 28 weeks 198 3.0 1

Finland Consultation 1991 28 weeks 225 3.5 1

Finland Consultation 1992 28 weeks 189 2.8 1

Finland Consultation 1993 28 weeks 175 2.7 1

Finland Consultation 1994 28 weeks 167 2.6 1

Finland Consultation 1995 28 weeks 192 3.1 1

Finland Consultation 1996 28 weeks 167 2.8 1

Finland Consultation 1997 28 weeks 176 3.0 1

Finland Consultation 1998 28 weeks 148 2.6 1

Finland Consultation 1999 28 weeks 130 2.3 1

Finland Consultation 2000 28 weeks 147 2.6 1

Finland Consultation 2001 28 weeks 145 2.6 1

Finland Consultation 2002 28 weeks 135 2.4 1

Finland Consultation 2003 28 weeks 134 2.4 1

Finland Consultation 2004 28 weeks 117 2.0 1

Finland Consultation 2005 28 weeks 115 2.0 1

Finland Consultation 2006 28 weeks 137 2.3 1

Finland Consultation 2007 28 weeks 151 2.6 1

Finland Consultation 2008 28 weeks 124 2.1 1

Finland Consultation 2009 28 weeks 131 2.2 1

Finland Consultation 2010 28 weeks 120 2.0 1

Finland Consultation 2011 28 weeks 113 1.9 1

Finland Consultation 2012 28 weeks 116 1.9 1

Finland Consultation 2013 28 weeks 106 1.8 1

Finland Consultation 2014 28 weeks 112 1.9 1

France National Statistical Office 1990 1000g 4488 5.9 1

France National Statistical Office 1991 1000g 4364 5.7 1

France National Statistical Office 1992 1000g 4055 5.4 1

France National Statistical Office 1993 1000g 3791 5.3 1

France National Statistical Office 1994 1000g 3633 5.1 1

France National Statistical Office 1995 1000g 3859 5.3 1

Page 32: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

30

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

France National Statistical Office 1996 1000g 3689 5.0 1

France National Statistical Office 1997 1000g 3576 4.9 1

France National Statistical Office 1998 1000g 3685 5.0 1

France National Statistical Office 1999 1000g 3442 4.6 1

France National Statistical Office 2000 1000g 3559 4.6 1

France National Statistical Office 2001 1000g 3741 4.8 1

France National Statistical Office 2002 500g 6259 8.2 1

France National Statistical Office 2003 500g 6862 8.9 1

France National Statistical Office 2004 500g 7054 9.1 1

France National Statistical Office 2005 500g 6964 8.9 1

France Eurozone WHO 2006 500g 7531 9.4 1

France Eurozone WHO 2007 500g 7246 9.1 1

France Eurozone WHO 2008 500g 8356 10.4 1

France Eurozone WHO 2009 500g 9377 11.7 1

France Eurozone WHO 2010 500g 8206 10.1 1

France Eurozone WHO 2011 500g 7649 9.6 1

France L'etat de la sante 2012 28 weeks NG 4.3 1

France L'etat de la sante 2013 22 weeks NG 8.9 1

Gambia Ceesay 1992 Not defined 24 23.5 4

Gambia HMIS 2013 Not defined 1734 27.0 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 1995 22 weeks NG 11.5 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 1996 22 weeks NG 17.7 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 1997 22 weeks NG 20.1 2

Georgia DHS survey 1997 1000g 47 15.6 3

Georgia GEOSTAT 1998 22 weeks NG 22.3 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 1999 22 weeks NG 19.3 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2000 22 weeks NG 17.6 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2001 22 weeks NG 15.4 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2002 22 weeks NG 15.3 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2003 22 weeks NG 17.3 2

Georgia DHS survey 2003 1000g 35 15.9 3

Georgia GEOSTAT 2004 22 weeks NG 17.2 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2005 22 weeks NG 15.6 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2006 22 weeks 712 14.7 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2007 22 weeks 632 12.7 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2008 22 weeks 660 11.5 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2009 22 weeks 484 7.6 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2010 22 weeks 653 10.3 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2011 22 weeks 563 9.6 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2012 22 weeks 664 11.5 2

Georgia GEOSTAT 2013 22 weeks 567 9.7 2

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1990 1000g 3202 3.5 1

Page 33: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

31

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1991 1000g 2741 3.3 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1992 1000g 2660 3.3 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1993 1000g 2467 3.1 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1994 500g 3113 4.0 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1995 500g 3405 4.4 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1996 500g 3573 4.5 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1997 500g 3510 4.3 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1998 500g 3190 4.0 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 1999 500g 3118 4.0 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 2000 500g 3084 4.0 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 2001 500g 2881 3.9 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 2002 500g 2700 3.7 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 2003 500g 2699 3.8 1

Germany EURO-PERISTAT project 2004 1000g NG 2.6 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 2005 500g 2487 3.6 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 2006 500g 2420 3.6 1

Germany National Statistical Office/Eurozone WHO 2007 500g 2371 3.5 1

Germany Byndesauswertung 2008 28 weeks 1559 2.3 1

Germany Byndesauswertung 2009 28 weeks 1444 2.2 1

Germany Byndesauswertung 2010 28 weeks 1429 2.2 1

Germany Byndesauswertung 2011 28 weeks 1466 2.3 1

Germany Byndesauswertung 2012 28 weeks 1512 2.3 1

Germany Byndesauswertung 2013 28 weeks 1574 2.4 1

Ghana Edmond 2003 1000g NG 32.6 4

Ghana Ha 2005.

5 24 weeks 2601 32.4 4

Ghana DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 40 13.6 3

Greece National Statistical Office 1990 All 735 7.1 1

Greece National Statistical Office 1991 All 706 6.8 1

Greece National Statistical Office 1992 All 629 6.0 1

Greece National Statistical Office 1993 All 679 6.6 1

Greece National Statistical Office 1994 All 599 5.7 1

Greece National Statistical Office 1995 All 645 6.3 1

Page 34: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

32

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Greece National Statistical Office 1996 All 599 5.9 1

Greece National Statistical Office 1997 All 628 6.1 1

Greece National Statistical Office 1998 All 597 5.9 1

Greece National Statistical Office 1999 All 624 6.2 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2000 All 540 5.2 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2001 All 588 5.7 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2002 All 510 4.9 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2003 All 504 4.8 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2004 All 477 4.5 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2005 All 421 3.9 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2006 All 376 3.3 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2007 All 434 3.9 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2008 All 392 3.3 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2009 All 505 4.3 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2010 All 500 4.3 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2011 All 431 4.0 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2012 All 446 4.4 1

Greece National Statistical Office 2013 All 376 4.0 1

Guatemala National Statistical Office 1999 Not defined NG 15.2 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2000 Not defined 6164 14.3 2

Guatemala DHS survey 2000 28 weeks 104 17.6 3

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2001 Not defined 5686 13.5 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2002 Not defined 5631 14.3 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2003 20 weeks 5318 14.0 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2004 20 weeks 5124 13.2 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2005 20 weeks 4693 12.4 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2006 20 weeks 4499 12.1 2

Guatemala DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 183 19.4 3

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2007 20 weeks 4265 11.5 2

Guatemala McClure 2007.

5 1000g 253 15.0 4

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2008 20 weeks 3947 10.6 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 2934 8.3 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2009 20 weeks 3207 9.1 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 3062 8.5 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 2927 7.8 2

Guatemala Saleem 2011 1000g 398 20.0 4

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 2782 7.2 2

Guatemala National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 2967 7.7 2

Guinea DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 98 15.2 3

Guinea-Bissau Kaestrel 2001 28 weeks 31 56.0 4

Guyana DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 28 14.7 3

Honduras DHS survey 1994 28 weeks 86 10.6 3

Honduras DHS survey 1999 28 weeks 130 15.8 3

Page 35: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

33

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Honduras DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 124 12.1 3

Honduras DHS survey 2009 28 weeks 102 9.9 3

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1990 28 weeks 699 5.5 2

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1991 28 weeks 575 4.5 2

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1992 28 weeks 509 4.2 2

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1993 28 weeks 425 3.6 2

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1994 28 weeks 408 3.5 2

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks 393 3.5 2

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks 397 3.8 2

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks 480 4.8 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks 433 4.4 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks 365 3.8 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 406 4.1 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 414 4.2 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 398 4.1 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 421 4.4 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 360 3.8 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 394 4.0 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 380 3.8 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 383 3.9 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 332 3.3 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 398 4.1 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 304 3.4 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 309 3.5 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 303 3.3 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 301 3.4 1

Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office 2014 28 weeks 339 3.7 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 1992 28 weeks 16 3.5 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 1993 28 weeks 9 1.9 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 1994 28 weeks 15 3.4 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks 8 1.9 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks 20 4.6 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks 13 3.1 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks 9 2.1 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks 19 4.6 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 15 3.5 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 11 2.7 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 7 1.7 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 4 1.0 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 15 3.5 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 8 1.9 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 15 3.4 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 7 1.5 1

Page 36: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

34

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Iceland National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 11 2.3 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 12 2.4 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 9 1.8 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 4 0.9 1

Iceland National Statistical Office 2014 28 weeks 11 2.5 1

India Bai 1991.

5 1000g 357 27.0 4

India Khandait 1995 Not defined NG 24.5 5

India Chandra 1995 Not defined NG 26.7 5

India Bang 1996 1000g NG 40.9 4

India Williams 1997 All NG 24.7 3

India Sinha 1998 Not defined NG 23.8 4

India PAUL 2000 Not defined NG 87.7 5

India Biswas 2002 Not defined NG 38.5 5

India Patel 2003 Not defined NG 18.5 5

India DLHS-2 2003 28 weeks 3499 18.3 3

India BAQUI 2003 1000g NG 31.8 4

India BALIGA 2004 Not defined NG 34.3 5

India DHS survey 2004 1000g 1105 19.2 3

India Gupta 2004 20 weeks NG 41.4 4

India McClure 2006 1000g 257 21.0 4

India McClure 2006 1000g 280 27.0 4

India Prost 2006.

5 22 weeks 280 30.2 4

India DLHS-3 2007 28 weeks 2876 13.9 3

India McClure 2007.

5 1000g 842 18.5 4

India McClure 2007.

5 1000g 526 27.3 4

India McClure 2007.

5 1000g 212 28.6 4

India WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 39 36.7 5

India Bbhandari 2008 28 weeks 836 26.4 4

India WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 931 41.3 4

India HMIS 2009 28 weeks 269586 15.6 2

India Goudar 2009.

5 1000g 124 29.6 4

India HMIS 2010 28 weeks 259354 14.5 2

India Spector 2010 Not defined 22 22.7 4

India WHOMCS 2011 1000g 713 36.9 5

India HMIS 2011 28 weeks 277714 17.1 2

India Kochar 2011 28 weeks 283 18.7 3

India Saleem 2011 1000g 1607 25.7 4

India WHOMCS 2011 1000g 277 26.0 4

India Saleem 2011 1000g 824 27.9 4

India HMIS 2012 28 weeks 297882 16.7 2

Page 37: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

35

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

India Kumar 2013 28 weeks 281 17.1 4

India Varghese unpublished 2014 28 weeks 4116 20.4 4

Indonesia DHS survey 1995 1000g NG 10.0 3

Indonesia DHS survey 2001 1000g NG 9.6 3

Indonesia Sunawang 2002 28 weeks 8 21.1 4

Indonesia Shankar 2003 1000g NG 17.7 4

Indonesia Poespoprodj 2005 Not defined NG 21.1 5

Indonesia DHS survey 2005 1000g NG 10.4 3

Indonesia Burke 2007 1000g 24 13.4 4

Indonesia DHS survey 2010 1000g 181 10.6 3

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 1999 20 weeks 41 10.6 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2000 20 weeks 43 10.5 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2001 20 weeks 42 10.4 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2002 20 weeks 43 10.3 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2003 20 weeks 38 10.1 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Abdi-Rad 2003 Not defined NG 17.6 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2004 20 weeks 34 9.9 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2005 20 weeks 34 9.4 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2006 20 weeks 30 9.0 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hadavi 2006.

5 20 weeks 127 12.7 4

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2007 20 weeks 31 8.7 5

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Hajian-Tilaki 2008 20 weeks 32 8.7 5

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1990 1000g 327 6.1 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1991 1000g 301 5.7 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1992 1000g 285 5.5 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1993 1000g 291 5.9 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1994 1000g 297 6.1 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1995 500g 330 6.7 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1996 500g 334 6.6 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1997 500g 368 6.9 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1998 500g 328 6.0 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 1999 500g 311 5.7 1

Ireland Eurozone WHO 2000 500g 325 5.9 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2001 22 weeks 339 5.8 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2002 22 weeks 343 5.6 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2003 22 weeks 357 5.8 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2004 22 weeks 339 5.4 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2005 22 weeks 306 5.0 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2006 22 weeks 308 4.7 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2007 22 weeks 393 5.5 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2008 22 weeks 358 4.7 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2009 22 weeks 372 4.9 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2010 22 weeks 355 4.7 1

Page 38: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

36

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2011 22 weeks 297 4.0 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2012 2012 22 weeks 281 3.9 1

Ireland Perinatal Statistics Report 2013 2013 22 weeks 277 4.0 1

Israel consultation 1995 1000g NG 4.4 1

Israel consultation 2000 1000g NG 4.2 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2002 1000g 519 3.7 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2003 1000g 532 3.7 1

Israel consultation 2004 1000g 462 3.4 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2005 1000g 504 3.5 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2006 1000g 556 3.7 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2007 1000g 537 3.5 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2008 1000g 526 3.3 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2009 1000g 529 3.3 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2010 1000g 500 3.0 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2011 1000g 507 3.0 1

Israel National Statistical Office 2012 1000g 585 3.4 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1990 1000g 3103 5.4 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1991 1000g 3079 5.4 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1992 1000g 2762 4.8 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1993 1000g 2596 4.7 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1994 1000g 2377 4.4 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1995 1000g 2218 4.2 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1996 1000g 2186 4.1 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1997 1000g 2168 4.0 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1998 1000g 2089 3.9 1

Italy National Statistical Office 1999 1000g 1965 3.7 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2000 1000g 1818 3.4 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2001 1000g 1868 3.5 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2002 1000g 1655 3.2 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2003 1000g 1660 3.2 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2004 1000g 1658 3.0 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2005 1000g 1766 3.2 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2006 1000g 1628 2.9 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2007 1000g 1575 2.8 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2008 1000g 1549 2.7 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2009 1000g 1552 2.7 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2010 1000g 1510 2.7 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2011 1000g 1463 2.7 1

Italy National Statistical Office 2012 1000g 1522 2.9 1

Jamaica National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks NG 18.9 2

Jamaica National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks NG 18.0 2

Jamaica National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks NG 16.8 2

Jamaica National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks NG 19.2 2

Page 39: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

37

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Jamaica National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks NG 16.9 2

Jamaica DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 53 11.9 3

Jamaica National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks NG 16.2 2

Jamaica Pan-American Health Orginization 2008 28 weeks NG 17.0 2

Jamaica Pan-American Health Orginization 2009 28 weeks NG 16.6 2

Jamaica Pan-American Health Orginization 2010 28 weeks NG 14.7 2

Japan National Statistical Office 1990 500g 11367 9.2 1

Japan National Statistical Office 1991 500g 8258 6.7 1

Japan National Statistical Office 1992 500g 7758 6.4 1

Japan National Statistical Office 1993 500g 7191 6.0 1

Japan National Statistical Office 1994 500g 7200 5.8 1

Japan Consultation 1995 500g 6580 5.5 1

Japan Consultation 1996 500g 6333 5.2 1

Japan Consultation 1997 500g 6009 5.0 1

Japan Consultation 1998 500g 5804 4.8 1

Japan Consultation 1999 500g 5567 4.7 1

Japan Consultation 2000 500g 5362 4.5 1

Japan Consultation 2001 500g 5114 4.3 1

Japan Consultation 2002 500g 4959 4.3 1

Japan Consultation 2003 500g 4626 4.1 1

Japan Consultation 2004 500g 4357 3.9 1

Japan Consultation 2005 500g 4058 3.8 1

Japan Consultation 2006 500g 4047 3.7 1

Japan Consultation 2007 500g 3854 3.5 1

Japan Consultation 2008 500g 3751 3.4 1

Japan Consultation 2009 500g 3645 3.4 1

Japan Updated in consultation 2010 500g 3637 3.4 1

Japan Updated in consultation 2011 500g 3491 3.3 1

Japan Updated in consultation 2012 500g 3343 3.2 1

Jordan DHS survey 2000 28 weeks 59 10.0 3

Jordan Al-Rabee 2000 Not defined NG 18.3 3

Jordan DHS survey 2005 28 weeks 58 5.8 3

Jordan DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 81 8.8 3

Jordan DHS survey 2010 28 weeks 51 5.2 3

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1990 1000g 3692 10.1 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1991 1000g 3474 9.7 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1992 1000g 3184 9.3 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1993 1000g 2710 8.5 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1994 1000g 2705 8.7 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1995 1000g NG 8.8 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1996 1000g NG 9.3 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1997 1000g NG 9.4 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1998 1000g NG 9.2 2

Page 40: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

38

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 1999 1000g NG 8.9 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2000 1000g NG 8.5 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2001 1000g NG 7.9 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2002 1000g NG 7.8 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2003 1000g NG 7.2 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2004 1000g NG 6.6 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2005 1000g NG 6.8 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2006 1000g NG 6.8 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2007 1000g NG 6.7 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2008 500g NG 11.7 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2009 500g 3713 10.3 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2010 500g 3488 9.4 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2011 500g 3501 9.3 2

Kazakhstan Eurozone WHO 2012 500g 3745 9.7 2

Kenya Kavoo-Linge and K.O. Rogo 1990 1000g 74 34.1 5

Kenya DHS survey 1996 28 weeks NG 13.5 3

Kenya Gichangi 1997 Not defined NG 13.8 5

Kenya Mwanyumba 1999 1000g NG 57.1 5

Kenya English 2000 Not defined NG 57.6 5

Kenya DHS survey 2001 28 weeks 84 13.6 3

Kenya WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 267 45.0 5

Kenya WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 331 24.9 4

Kenya DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 68 11.5 3

Kenya McClure 2007.

5 1000g 142 22.4 4

Kenya INTERGROWTH-21 2011 28 weeks 70 9.1 5

Kenya WHOMCS 2011 1000g 264 29.5 5

Kenya Saleem 2011 1000g 581 21.2 4

Kenya WHOMCS 2011 1000g 317 29.7 4

Kenya DHIS2 2014 Not defined NG 39.4 2

Kuwait National Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks NG 7.3 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks NG 7.8 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks NG 6.5 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks NG 7.2 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks NG 6.2 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks NG 6.4 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks NG 6.9 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 325 7.4 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 307 6.9 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 355 7.5 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 375 7.3 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 347 6.5 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 374 6.9 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 367 6.7 1

Page 41: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

39

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 335 5.9 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 346 6.0 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 313 5.3 1

Kuwait National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 355 5.9 1

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 1990 28 weeks 1149 8.8 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 1991 28 weeks 1108 8.5 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 759 7.5 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 879 8.3 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2004 All 1437 12.9 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2005 All 1586 14.2 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2006 All 1621 13.2 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2007 All 1730 13.8 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2008 All 1664 12.9 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2009 All 1703 12.4 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2010 All 1624 11.0 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2011 All 1675 11.1 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2012 All 1575 10.1 2

Kyrgyzstan National Statistical Office 2013 All 1549 9.9 2

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1990 22 weeks 226 5.9 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1991 22 weeks 315 9.0 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1992 22 weeks 340 10.7 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1993 22 weeks 276 10.2 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1994 22 weeks 244 10.0 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1995 22 weeks 194 8.9 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1996 22 weeks 187 9.4 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1997 22 weeks 169 8.9 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1998 22 weeks 179 9.6 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 1999 22 weeks 165 8.4 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2000 500g 158 7.7 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2001 22 weeks 138 6.9 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2002 22 weeks 176 8.7 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2003 500g 130 6.1 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2004 22 weeks 136 6.6 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2005 22 weeks 132 6.0 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2006 22 weeks 154 6.7 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2007 22 weeks 121 5.0 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2008 22 weeks 150 6.1 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2009 22 weeks 130 5.9 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2010 22 weeks 109 5.5 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2011 22 weeks 112 5.9 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2012 22 weeks 105 5.2 1

Latvia Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia 2013 22 weeks 114 5.5 1

Lebanon WHOMCS 2011 1000g 15 8.4 5

Page 42: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

40

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Lebanon National Statistical Office 2011 Not defined 1005 12.8 2

Lebanon WHOMCS 2011 1000g 12 6.4 4

Lebanon National Statistical Office 2012 Not defined 994 12.3 2

Lesotho DHS survey 2006 1000g 63 16.6 3

Liberia DHS survey 2004 28 weeks 81 14.3 3

Liberia DHS survey 2010 28 weeks 70 10.7 3

Liberia Moseson 2011.

5 1000g 322 44.4 4

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1990 Not defined 305 5.3 2

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1991 Not defined 408 7.2 2

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1992 Not defined 434 7.9 2

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1993 Not defined 372 7.8 2

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1994 Not defined 295 6.9 2

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1995 Not defined 285 6.9 1

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1996 Not defined 234 6.0 1

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1997 Not defined 248 6.5 1

Lithuania Eurozone WHO 1998 Not defined 240 6.4 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 1999 1000g NG 4.3 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 1999 Not defined 207 5.7 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2000 1000g NG 5.3 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2001 1000g NG 4.2 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2002 1000g NG 5.0 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2003 1000g NG 4.3 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2004 1000g NG 3.9 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2005 1000g NG 3.9 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2006 1000g NG 3.5 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2007 1000g NG 3.8 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2008 1000g NG 3.7 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2009 1000g NG 3.6 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2010 1000g NG 3.3 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2011 1000g NG 3.3 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2012 1000g NG 3.2 1

Lithuania Statistics Lithuania 2013 1000g NG 3.0 1

Luxembourg National Statistical Office 1992 All 24 4.6 1

Luxembourg National Statistical Office 1993 All 22 4.1 1

Luxembourg National Statistical Office 1994 All 20 3.7 1

Luxembourg National Statistical Office 1995 All 24 4.4 1

Luxembourg Consultation 1996 1000g NG 2.6 1

Luxembourg Consultation 1998 All NG 5.7 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2000 1000g NG 4.0 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2001 1000g NG 3.3 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2002 1000g NG 3.5 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2003 1000g NG 2.6 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2004 1000g NG 2.7 1

Page 43: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

41

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Luxembourg Consultation 2005 1000g NG 3.7 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2007 1000g NG 3.3 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2008 28 weeks 16 3.0 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2009 28 weeks 23 4.2 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2010 28 weeks 17 3.0 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2011 28 weeks 19 3.5 1

Luxembourg Consultation 2012 28 weeks 22 3.7 1

Madagascar DHS survey 2001 28 weeks 86 13.5 3

Madagascar DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 175 13.6 3

Malawi Kulmala 1996 Not defined NG 47.4 4

Malawi DHS survey 1998 28 weeks 163 13.2 3

Malawi DHS survey 2002 28 weeks 168 15.4 3

Malawi Metaferia 2005 Not defined NG 33.9 5

Malawi DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 316 15.8 3

Malawi Prost 2007.

5 22 weeks 65 19.5 4

Malawi Colbourn 2009 Not defined 615 31.6 4

Malawi Hall unpublished 2013 28 weeks 66 16.6 4

Malawi DHIS2 maternity register jan-jun 2014 2014 1000g 3532 16.6 2

Malaysia Al-Mohdzar 1991 Not defined 139 19.5 5

Malaysia National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks NG 4.4 2

Malaysia National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 2213 4.5 2

Malaysia National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 2305 4.5 2

Malaysia National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 2222 4.3 2

Maldives Consultation 1999 1000g NG 11.5 2

Maldives Consultation 2000 1000g NG 13.0 2

Maldives Consultation 2001 1000g NG 10.7 2

Maldives Consultation 2002 1000g NG 12.0 2

Maldives Consultation 2003 1000g NG 13.6 2

Maldives Consultation 2004 1000g NG 8.9 2

Maldives Consultation 2005 1000g NG 8.0 2

Maldives Consultation 2006 1000g NG 10.8 2

Maldives National Statistical Office 2007 1000g 58 8.8 2

Maldives DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 34 9.0 3

Maldives National Statistical Office 2008 1000g 49 7.0 2

Maldives National Statistical Office 2009 1000g 54 7.4 2

Maldives National Statistical Office 2010 1000g 48 6.8 2

Maldives National Statistical Office 2011 1000g 43 6.0 2

Malta Eurozone WHO 1992 1000g 28 5.1 1

Malta Eurozone WHO 1993 1000g 25 4.8 1

Malta Eurozone WHO 1994 1000g 33 6.8 1

Malta Eurozone WHO 1995 1000g 17 3.7 1

Malta Eurozone WHO 1996 1000g 29 5.8 1

Malta Eurozone WHO 1997 1000g 24 4.9 1

Page 44: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

42

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Malta Eurozone WHO 1998 1000g 23 5.1 1

Malta Eurozone WHO 1999 1000g 27 6.2 1

Malta Consultation 2000 28 weeks 14 3.2 1

Malta Consultation 2001 28 weeks 17 4.3 1

Malta Consultation 2002 28 weeks 16 4.1 1

Malta Consultation 2003 28 weeks 15 3.7 1

Malta Consultation 2004 28 weeks 15 3.9 1

Malta Consultation 2005 28 weeks 7 1.8 1

Malta Consultation 2006 28 weeks 7 1.8 1

Malta Consultation 2007 28 weeks 8 2.1 1

Malta Consultation 2008 28 weeks 22 5.2 1

Malta Consultation 2009 28 weeks 17 4.1 1

Malta Consultation 2010 28 weeks 14 3.5 1

Malta Consultation 2011 28 weeks 19 4.4 1

Malta Consultation 2012 28 weeks 11 2.6 1

Mauritania Chalumeau - Moma trial 1995 22 weeks NG 30.1 4

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1990 28 weeks 348 15.7 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1991 28 weeks 386 17.7 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1992 28 weeks 286 12.7 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1993 28 weeks 333 15.1 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1994 28 weeks 271 12.7 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1995 28 weeks 297 14.8 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1996 28 weeks 264 13.0 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1997 28 weeks 253 12.9 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1998 28 weeks 221 11.7 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 1999 28 weeks 219 11.1 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2000 28 weeks 263 13.4 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2001 28 weeks 234 12.2 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2002 28 weeks 197 10.2 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2003 28 weeks 205 10.9 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2004 28 weeks 167 9.1 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2005 28 weeks 173 9.6 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2006 28 weeks 135 8.0 1

Page 45: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

43

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2007 28 weeks 157 9.6 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2008 28 weeks 159 10.1 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2009 28 weeks 133 9.0 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2010 28 weeks 95 6.6 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2011 28 weeks 136 9.6 1

Mauritius Family planning & demographic yearbook 2012 2012 28 weeks 132 9.5 1

Mexico National Statistical Office 1995 Not defined NG 8.1 2

Mexico National Statistical Office 1996 Not defined NG 7.8 2

Mexico National Statistical Office 1997 Not defined NG 7.7 2

Mexico National Statistical Office 1998 Not defined NG 8.0 2

Mexico National Statistical Office 1999 Not defined NG 7.8 2

Mexico National Statistical Office 2000 Not defined NG 7.8 2

Mexico National Statistical Office 2001 1000g NG 5.5 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2002 28 weeks 14971 5.5 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2003 28 weeks 14513 5.4 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2004 28 weeks 14098 5.3 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2005 28 weeks 13641 5.3 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2006 28 weeks 12816 5.1 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2007 28 weeks 12335 4.6 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2008 28 weeks 11937 4.5 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2009 28 weeks 11459 4.4 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2010 28 weeks 11188 4.2 2

Mexico estadisticas vitales INEGI 2011 28 weeks 11096 4.3 2

Monaco Eurozone WHO 1992 Not defined 5 18.5 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2000 22 weeks 606 11.7 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2001 22 weeks 582 11.9 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2002 22 weeks 537 11.6 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2003 22 weeks 548 12.1 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2004 22 weeks 480 10.7 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2005 22 weeks 439 9.6 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2006 22 weeks 440 9.2 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2007 22 weeks 429 7.6 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2008 22 weeks 480 7.5 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2009 22 weeks 441 6.4 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2010 22 weeks 486 7.3 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2011 22 weeks 499 7.0 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2012 22 weeks 507 6.7 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2013 22 weeks 539 6.7 2

Mongolia Center for health development, NSO 2014 22 weeks 528 6.4 2

Montenegro Eurozone WHO 1990 28 weeks 41 4.4 2

Page 46: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

44

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Montenegro Eurozone WHO 1991 28 weeks 44 4.6 2

Montenegro Eurozone WHO 1992 28 weeks 47 4.9 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 1993 28 weeks 51 5.7 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 1994 28 weeks 37 4.1 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 1995 28 weeks 44 4.6 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 1996 28 weeks 60 6.6 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 1997 28 weeks 51 5.8 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 1998 28 weeks 50 5.4 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 1999 28 weeks 28 3.2 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2000 28 weeks 37 4.0 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2001 28 weeks 53 6.0 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2002 28 weeks 47 5.5 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2003 28 weeks 42 5.0 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2004 28 weeks 38 4.8 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2005 28 weeks 27 3.7 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2006 28 weeks 20 2.6 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2007 28 weeks 22 2.8 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2008 28 weeks 34 4.1 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2009 28 weeks 43 5.0 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2010 28 weeks 23 3.1 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2011 28 weeks 37 5.1 2

Montenegro Statistical Yearbook 2012 2012 28 weeks 32 4.3 2

Morocco MOH 1994 Not defined 6522 35.9 2

Morocco MOH 1995 Not defined 6304 33.8 2

Morocco MOH 1996 Not defined 5936 32.0 2

Morocco MOH 1997 Not defined 6220 31.6 2

Morocco MOH 1998 Not defined 6668 32.9 2

Morocco MOH 1999 Not defined 6358 31.5 2

Morocco MOH 2000 Not defined 6831 31.0 2

Morocco MOH 2001 Not defined 6219 28.7 2

Morocco DHS survey 2001 28 weeks 102 16.6 3

Morocco MOH 2002 Not defined 6475 28.5 2

Morocco MOH 2003 Not defined 6416 27.2 2

Morocco MOH 2004 Not defined 6593 26.5 2

Morocco MOH 2005 Not defined 6543 25.1 2

Morocco MOH 2006 Not defined 6602 24.9 2

Morocco MOH 2007 Not defined 6410 23.0 2

Morocco MOH 2008 Not defined 6235 20.1 2

Morocco MOH 2009 Not defined 6979 19.7 2

Morocco MOH 2010 Not defined 7283 19.1 2

Morocco MOH 2011 Not defined 7476 18.8 2

Morocco MOH 2012 Not defined 7575 18.6 2

Mozambique DHS survey 2001 28 weeks 211 19.5 3

Page 47: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

45

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Mozambique DHS survey 2008 28 weeks 127 10.7 3

Namibia DHS survey 2004 28 weeks 46 9.1 3

Namibia DHS survey 2010 28 weeks 39 8.1 3

Nepal JAHN 1997 Not defined NG 70.0 5

Nepal Christian 1999 28 weeks 28 35.4 4

Nepal Dali 2000 1000g NG 24.8 5

Nepal manandhar 2001 Not defined NG 30.1 5

Nepal Prost 2002 22 weeks 77 23.3 4

Nepal manandhar 2002 1000g NG 23.9 4

Nepal Osrin 2002.

5 20 weeks 33 29.0 4

Nepal Shrestha 2004 1000g NG 14.5 5

Nepal DHS survey 2004 28 weeks NG 22.2 3

Nepal Lee 2004.

5 1000g 869 35.4 4

Nepal Manandhar 2006.

5 22 weeks 82 16.7 5

Nepal WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 178 21.5 4

Nepal DHS survey 2009 28 weeks 53 9.7 3

Nepal WHOMCS 2010 1000g 99 19.1 5

Nepal WHOMCS 2010 1000g 117 20.2 4

Netherlands Eurozone WHO 1996 24 weeks 1221 6.4 1

Netherlands Eurozone WHO 1997 24 weeks 1279 6.6 1

Netherlands Eurozone WHO 1998 24 weeks 1271 6.3 1

Netherlands Eurozone WHO 1999 24 weeks 1263 6.3 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2000 28 weeks 966 5.1 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2001 28 weeks 991 5.3 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2002 28 weeks 921 5.0 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2003 28 weeks 850 4.5 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2004 28 weeks 763 4.3 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2005 28 weeks 735 4.2 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2006 28 weeks 661 3.8 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2007 28 weeks 590 3.5 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2008 28 weeks 618 3.5 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2009 28 weeks 543 3.1 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2010 28 weeks 515 2.9 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2011 28 weeks 520 3.0 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2012 28 weeks 460 2.7 1

Netherlands Perinatal care in The Netherlands 2013 28 weeks 372 2.2 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 1990 28 weeks 247 4.1 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 1991 28 weeks 275 4.6 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 1992 28 weeks 237 4.0 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 1993 28 weeks 179 3.0 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 1994 28 weeks 185 3.2 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks 245 4.2 1

Page 48: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

46

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

New Zealand Consultation 1996 1000g NG 3.8 1

New Zealand Consultation 1997 1000g NG 3.9 1

New Zealand Consultation 1998 1000g NG 3.4 1

New Zealand Consultation 1999 1000g NG 3.8 1

New Zealand Consultation 2000 1000g NG 3.3 1

New Zealand Consultation 2001 1000g NG 3.4 1

New Zealand Consultation 2002 1000g NG 3.2 1

New Zealand Consultation 2003 1000g NG 3.5 1

New Zealand Consultation 2004 1000g NG 3.8 1

New Zealand Consultation 2005 1000g NG 3.2 1

New Zealand Consultation 2006 1000g NG 3.0 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 2007 1000g 211 3.2 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 2008 1000g 207 3.2 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 2009 1000g 229 3.6 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 2010 1000g 199 3.1 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 2011 1000g 190 3.1 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 2012 1000g 166 2.7 1

New Zealand National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 164 2.8 1

Nicaragua DHS survey 1999 28 weeks 65 9.9 3

Nicaragua WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 14 8.5 5

Nicaragua DHS survey 2004 28 weeks 89 9.9 3

Nicaragua WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 27 6.9 4

Nicaragua WHOMCS 2010 1000g 19 4.5 4

Niger Chalumeau - Moma trial 1995 22 weeks NG 19.6 4

Niger HMIS 2002 1000g 2913 40.5 2

Niger HMIS 2003 1000g 2234 29.6 2

Niger WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 97 55.7 5

Niger HMIS 2004 1000g 1954 26.9 2

Niger Zagre 2004 Not defined 44 31.9 4

Niger WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 207 33.3 4

Niger HMIS 2005 1000g 3064 36.7 2

Niger HMIS 2007 1000g 3063 25.2 2

Niger HMIS 2008 1000g 3105 24.0 2

Niger HMIS 2009 1000g 3791 25.3 2

Niger DHS survey 2010 28 weeks 225 16.6 3

Niger WHOMCS 2011 1000g 30 76.5 5

Niger HMIS 2011 1000g 4439 20.1 2

Niger WHOMCS 2011 1000g 291 28.2 4

Niger HMIS 2012 1000g 4924 20.6 2

Nigeria Akpala 1990 1000g 61 41.1 4

Nigeria Adimora 1997 500g NG 68.1 5

Nigeria WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 475 72.3 4

Nigeria Onyiriuka 2006 1000g NG 39.7 5

Page 49: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

47

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Nigeria Mutihir 2006.

5 1000g 158 40.5 5

Nigeria WHOMCS 2011 1000g 131 46.7 5

Nigeria WHOMCS 2011 1000g 613 69.0 4

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1990 28 weeks 270 4.4 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1991 28 weeks 266 4.4 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1992 28 weeks 236 3.9 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1993 28 weeks 239 4.0 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1994 28 weeks 248 4.1 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1995 28 weeks 217 3.6 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1996 28 weeks 264 4.3 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1997 28 weeks 212 3.5 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1998 28 weeks 230 3.9 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1999 28 weeks 220 3.7 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2000 28 weeks 207 3.5 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2001 28 weeks 226 4.0 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2002 28 weeks 170 3.0 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2003 28 weeks 176 3.1 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2004 28 weeks 168 2.9 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2005 28 weeks 151 2.6 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2006 28 weeks 166 2.8 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2007 28 weeks 182 3.1 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2008 28 weeks 174 2.8 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2009 28 weeks 164 2.6 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2010 28 weeks 166 2.7 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2011 28 weeks 166 2.7 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2012 28 weeks 149 2.4 1

Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2013 28 weeks 143 2.4 1

Oman Bhat 2000 500g NG 10.7 5

Oman Patel 2002 500g 154 9.1 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2003 500g 381 9.4 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2004 500g 346 8.4 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2005 500g 387 9.1 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2006 500g 371 8.4 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2007 500g 447 9.4 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2008 500g 453 8.9 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2009 500g 496 8.8 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2010 500g 446 7.9 2

Oman INTERGROWTH-21 2010 28 weeks 35 4.6 4

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2011 500g 465 8.0 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2012 500g 516 8.3 2

Oman Statistical Yearbook 2014 2013 500g 497 7.4 2

Pakistan Naseem 1996 Not defined NG 36.0 5

Pakistan Jokhio 1998 24 weeks 638 71.0 4

Page 50: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

48

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Pakistan Korejo 2001 1000g NG 73.4 5

Pakistan Khaskheli 2003 Not defined NG 71.7 5

Pakistan Bhutta 2003 Not defined NG 60.5 4

Pakistan Jehan 2004 Not defined NG 33.6 4

Pakistan Bhutta 2005 28 weeks 48 53.5 4

Pakistan McClure 2006 1000g 330 33.7 4

Pakistan Bhutta 2007 Not defined 1010 43.9 4

Pakistan McClure 2007.

5 1000g 1466 32.0 4

Pakistan DHS survey 2010 28 weeks 412 33.3 3

Pakistan WHOMCS 2011 1000g 300 29.6 5

Pakistan WHOMCS 2011 1000g 82 31.8 4

Pakistan Saleem 2011 1000g 2237 56.1 4

Palestine National Statistical Office 1991 Not defined NG 10.5 2

Palestine National Statistical Office 2002 Not defined 584 6.1 2

Palestine National Statistical Office 2005 Not defined 776 7.5 2

Palestine National Statistical Office 2010 Not defined 616 4.9 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 372 6.0 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 371 6.0 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 378 6.0 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 319 5.0 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 394 6.0 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 415 6.1 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 449 6.5 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 358 5.2 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 396 5.8 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 399 5.4 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 426 5.6 2

Panama National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 370 5.0 2

Papua New Guinea Klufio 1990 Not defined 15 22.2 5

Papua New Guinea AMOA 1996 500g NG 22.0 5

Paraguay DHS survey 2002 28 weeks 67 14.2 3

Paraguay WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 43 12.6 5

Paraguay DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 62 16.7 3

Peru DHS survey 1998 28 weeks 114 9.2 3

Peru Oliveros Donahue 1999 Not defined NG 16.3 5

Peru Ticona Rendon 2001 1000g NG 14.1 5

Peru DHS survey 2001 28 weeks 54 8.3 3

Peru WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 144 10.8 5

Peru DHS survey 2005 28 weeks 104 12.1 3

Peru Gonzales 2005 1000g NG 11.6 4

Peru DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 80 8.5 3

Peru DHS survey 2008 28 weeks 52 6.1 3

Peru DHS survey 2009 28 weeks 69 8.1 3

Page 51: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

49

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Peru WHOMCS 2010 1000g 100 8.2 5

Peru DHS survey 2010 28 weeks 140 8.1 3

Peru WHOMCS 2010 1000g 17 6.1 4

Peru DHS survey 2011 28 weeks 149 8.7 3

Philippines NSO 1990 All 11915 7.3 2

Philippines DHS survey 1996 28 weeks NG 12.0 3

Philippines DHS survey 2001 28 weeks 76 10.8 3

Philippines NSO 2005 All 10351 6.1 2

Philippines DHS survey 2006 28 weeks 93 14.4 3

Philippines WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 152 11.6 4

Philippines WHOMCS 2010 1000g 101 11.7 5

Philippines WHOMCS 2010 1000g 21 10.7 4

Philippines DHS survey 2011 28 weeks 83 11.7 3

Poland Demographic year book of Poland 2007 1990 1000g 3940 7.1 1

Poland Eurozone WHO 1993 500g 3398 6.8 2

Poland Eurozone WHO 1994 500g 3813 7.9 1

Poland Eurozone WHO 1995 500g 3203 7.3 1

Poland Eurozone WHO 1996 500g 3008 7.0 1

Poland Eurozone WHO 1997 500g 2531 6.1 2

Poland Eurozone WHO 1998 500g 2484 6.2 2

Poland Eurozone WHO 1999 500g 2377 6.2 1

Poland Demographic year book of poland 2000 1000g NG 4.3 1

Poland Eurozone WHO 2001 500g 2042 5.5 1

Poland Eurozone WHO 2002 500g 1761 5.0 1

Poland Eurozone WHO 2003 500g 1713 4.9 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2004 28 weeks 1342 3.8 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2005 28 weeks 1283 3.5 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2006 28 weeks 1338 3.6 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2007 28 weeks 1346 3.5 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2008 28 weeks 1422 3.4 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2009 28 weeks 1157 2.8 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2010 28 weeks 1226 3.0 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2011 28 weeks 1182 3.0 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2012 28 weeks 1174 3.0 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2013 28 weeks 1016 2.8 1

Poland Updated at consultation 2014 28 weeks 928 2.5 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 1996 28 weeks 538 4.9 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 1997 28 weeks 461 4.1 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 1998 28 weeks 454 4.0 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 1999 28 weeks 437 3.8 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2000 28 weeks 445 3.7 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2001 28 weeks 390 3.4 1

Page 52: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

50

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2002 28 weeks 390 3.4 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2003 28 weeks 351 3.1 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2004 28 weeks 299 2.7 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2005 28 weeks 306 2.8 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2006 28 weeks 326 3.1 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2007 28 weeks 289 2.8 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2008 28 weeks 265 2.5 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2009 28 weeks 293 2.9 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2010 28 weeks 242 2.4 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2011 28 weeks 228 2.3 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2012 28 weeks 249 2.8 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2013 28 weeks 181 2.2 1

Portugal Statistics Portugal 2014 28 weeks 188 2.3 1

Qatar National Statistical Office 1990 28 weeks 66 6.0 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 1991 28 weeks 78 7.9 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 1992 28 weeks 68 6.5 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 1993 28 weeks 87 8.0 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks 68 6.5 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks 72 6.9 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks 55 5.2 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks 70 6.5 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks 77 6.9 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 76 6.6 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 75 6.0 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 62 5.0 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 81 6.2 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 64 4.8 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 97 7.1 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 79 5.5 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 95 6.0 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 133 7.5 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 123 6.6 2

Qatar National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 130 6.6 2

Qatar WHOMCS 2011 1000g 16 4.1 5

Republic of Korea Korea Statistics 2009 28 weeks 1025 2.3 1

Republic of Korea Korea Statistics 2010 28 weeks 950 2.0 1

Republic of Korea Korea Statistics 2011 28 weeks 924 2.0 1

Republic of Korea Korea Statistics 2012 28 weeks 963 2.0 1

Republic of Korea Korea Statistics 2013 28 weeks 931 2.1 1

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1991 22 weeks 1084 14.3 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1992 22 weeks 1056 14.7 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1993 22 weeks 947 14.1 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1994 22 weeks 925 14.7 2

Page 53: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

51

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1995 22 weeks NG 12.4 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1996 22 weeks NG 13.4 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1997 22 weeks NG 11.7 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1998 22 weeks NG 11.5 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 1999 22 weeks NG 11.6 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2000 22 weeks NG 10.6 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2001 22 weeks NG 11.6 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2002 22 weeks NG 11.8 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2003 22 weeks NG 9.6 2

Republic of Moldova DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 23 14.3 3

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2004 22 weeks NG 9.8 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2005 22 weeks NG 8.9 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2006 22 weeks NG 8.5 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2007 22 weeks NG 7.5 2

Republic of Moldova Eurozone WHO 2008 22 weeks NG 7.6 2

Republic of Moldova Ala Curteanu perinatal audit 2009 1000g 178 5.4 2

Republic of Moldova Ala Curteanu perinatal audit 2010 1000g 205 5.7 2

Republic of Moldova Ala Curteanu perinatal audit 2011 1000g 170 5.4 2

Republic of Moldova Ala Curteanu perinatal audit 2012 1000g 163 5.0 2

Republic of Moldova Ala Curteanu perinatal audit 2013 1000g 179 5.1 2

Romania Eurozone WHO 1990 1000g 2231 7.0 1

Romania Eurozone WHO 1991 1000g 1910 6.9 1

Romania Eurozone WHO 1992 1000g 1700 6.5 1

Romania Eurozone WHO 1993 1000g 1582 6.3 1

Romania Eurozone WHO 1994 1000g 1623 6.5 1

Romania Eurozone WHO 1995 1000g 1472 6.2 1

Romania Eurozone WHO 1996 1000g 1428 6.1 1

Romania National Statistical Office 1997 1000g NG 6.2 1

Romania National Statistical Office 1998 1000g NG 6.3 1

Romania National Statistical Office 1999 1000g NG 6.2 1

Romania RHS 1999 28 weeks 25 11.8 3

Romania National Statistical Office 2000 1000g NG 5.9 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2001 1000g NG 5.8 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2002 1000g NG 6.2 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2003 1000g NG 6.0 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2004 1000g NG 6.0 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2005 1000g NG 5.6 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2006 1000g NG 5.1 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2007 1000g NG 4.6 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2008 1000g NG 4.4 1

Romania National Statistical Office 2009 1000g NG 4.2 1

Romania Eurozone WHO 2010 1000g 856 4.0 1

Romania Eurozone WHO 2011 1000g 811 4.1 1

Page 54: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

52

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Romania Eurozone WHO 2012 1000g 779 3.9 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1990 1000g 18165 9.1 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1991 1000g 15729 8.7 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1992 1000g 13243 8.3 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1993 1000g 10825 7.8 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1994 1000g 11012 7.8 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1995 1000g 10159 7.4 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1996 1000g 10245 7.8 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1997 1000g 10183 8.0 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1998 1000g 9761 7.5 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 1999 1000g 8864 7.2 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2000 1000g 8494 6.7 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2001 1000g 8711 6.6 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2002 1000g 8998 6.4 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2003 1000g 9043 6.1 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2004 1000g 8745 5.8 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2005 1000g 8328 5.7 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2006 1000g 7934 5.3 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2007 1000g 8612 5.3 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2008 1000g 8594 5.0 1

Russian Federation Russia Demograhic yearbook 2010 2009 1000g 8380 4.7 1

Russian Federation National Statistical Office 2010 1000g 8300 4.6 1

Russian Federation National Statistical Office 2011 1000g 8109 4.5 1

Rwanda DHS survey 1998 28 weeks 151 18.1 3

Rwanda DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 160 18.0 3

Rwanda Rwanda HMIS 2008 22 weeks 3092 12.5 2

Rwanda DHS survey 2008 28 weeks 154 16.6 3

Rwanda Rwanda HMIS 2009 22 weeks 4202 17.0 2

Rwanda Rwanda HMIS 2010 22 weeks 4043 17.0 2

Rwanda Rwanda HMIS 2011 22 weeks 5343 18.1 2

Rwanda Aimable Muafili 2012 22 weeks 158 18.4 5

Rwanda Rwanda HMIS 2012 22 weeks 4990 17.2 2

Rwanda Rwanda HMIS 2013 22 weeks 5510 18.2 2

Rwanda Rwanda HMIS 2014 22 weeks 6228 19.4 2

Saint Lucia National Statistical Office 2004 Not defined NG 15.0 1

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines National Statistical Office 2009 1000g NG 11.8 1

San Marino National Statistical Office 2010 Not defined NG 3.0 2

San Marino National Statistical Office 2011 Not defined 1 3.1 2

San Marino National Statistical Office 2013 Not defined NG 3.1 2

Saudi Arabia Archibong 1999 500g NG 10.1 4

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated from previous provisional 2002 Not defined 4161 17.0 2

Saudi Arabia Khashoggi 2002 500g NG 6.1 4

Page 55: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

53

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated from previous provisional 2003 Not defined 3863 16.4 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated from previous provisional 2004 Not defined 4600 18.4 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated from previous provisional 2005 Not defined 4704 19.0 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated from previous provisional 2006 Not defined 4418 17.6 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated from previous provisional 2007 Not defined 4165 16.1 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated 2008 Not defined 3631 13.9 2

Saudi Arabia Consultation 2008 Not defined NG 14.1 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated 2009 Not defined 3985 15.1 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated 2010 Not defined 4137 15.7 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated 2011 Not defined 2984 11.7 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated 2012 Not defined 3210 12.0 2

Saudi Arabia Statistical Yearbook 2014 - updated 2013 Not defined NG 13.2 2

Senegal Chalumeau - Moma trial 1995 22 weeks NG 22.9 4

Senegal Chalumeau - Moma trial 1995 22 weeks NG 31.0 4

Senegal Consultation 2003 Not defined NG 43.0 2

Senegal DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 215 20.0 3

Senegal Consultation 2004 Not defined NG 24.0 2

Senegal Consultation 2005 Not defined NG 25.0 2

Senegal Consultation 2006 Not defined NG 28.0 2

Senegal Consultation 2007 Not defined NG 30.0 2

Senegal Consultation 2008 Not defined NG 31.0 2

Senegal Annuaire statistique sanitaires 2010 2009 1000g NG 17.6 2

Senegal HMIS 2009 Not defined NG 33.0 2

Senegal DHS survey 2009 28 weeks 192 16.5 3

Senegal Annuaire statistique sanitaires 2010 2010 1000g 1042 17.2 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2003 1990 1000g 547 6.0 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2004 1991 1000g 521 5.7 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2005 1992 1000g 495 5.7 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2006 1993 1000g 523 5.9 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2007 1994 1000g 546 6.4 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2008 1995 1000g 556 6.4 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2009 1996 1000g 506 6.1 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2010 1997 1000g 450 5.6 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2011 1998 1000g 428 5.6 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2012 1999 1000g 386 5.3 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2000 1000g 370 5.0 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2001 1000g 418 5.3 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2002 1000g 432 5.5 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2003 1000g 411 5.2 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2004 1000g 419 5.3 2

Page 56: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

54

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2005 1000g 361 5.0 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2006 1000g 365 5.1 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2007 1000g 369 5.4 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2008 1000g 345 5.0 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2009 1000g 366 5.2 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2010 1000g 388 5.6 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2011 1000g 328 5.0 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2012 1000g 370 5.5 2

Serbia Demography statistics 2013 2013 1000g 307 4.7 2

Seychelles Consultation 1997 Not defined NG 8.1 2

Seychelles Consultation 1998 Not defined NG 9.1 2

Seychelles Consultation 1999 Not defined NG 7.5 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2000 28 weeks 12 7.9 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2001 28 weeks 9 6.3 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2002 28 weeks 15 10.1 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2003 28 weeks 18 12.0 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2004 28 weeks 7 4.9 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2005 28 weeks 13 8.5 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2006 28 weeks 16 10.9 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2007 28 weeks 12 8.0 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2008 28 weeks 15 9.7 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2009 28 weeks 11 7.0 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2010 28 weeks 9 6.0 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2011 28 weeks 18 11.1 2

Seychelles Consultation 2015 2012 28 weeks 15 9.1 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1990 1000g 206 4.0 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1991 1000g 198 4.0 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1992 1000g 171 3.4 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1993 1000g 168 3.3 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1994 1000g 167 3.4 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1995 1000g 140 2.9 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1996 1000g 150 3.1 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1997 1000g 139 2.9 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1998 1000g 133 3.0 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 1999 1000g 125 2.9 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2000 1000g 143 3.0 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2001 1000g 107 2.6 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2002 1000g 114 2.8 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2003 1000g 95 2.5 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2004 1000g 115 3.1 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2005 1000g 102 2.7 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2006 1000g 99 2.6 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2007 1000g 90 2.3 2

Page 57: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

55

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Singapore National Statistical Office 2008 1000g 86 2.2 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2009 1000g 79 2.0 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2010 1000g 99 2.6 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2011 1000g 106 2.7 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2012 1000g 111 2.6 2

Singapore National Statistical Office 2013 1000g 80 2.0 2

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 215 3.9 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 207 4.0 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 194 3.8 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 217 4.2 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 211 3.9 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 195 3.6 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 218 4.0 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 207 3.8 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 226 3.9 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 228 3.7 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 189 3.1 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 190 3.1 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 180 3.2 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 163 3.0 1

Slovakia Slovak National Statistical Office 2014 28 weeks 166 3.0 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 1990 28 weeks 100 4.5 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 1991 28 weeks 106 4.9 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 1992 28 weeks 110 5.5 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 1993 28 weeks 95 4.8 1

Slovenia Eurozone WHO 1994 28 weeks 104 5.3 1

Slovenia Eurozone WHO 1995 28 weeks 84 4.4 1

Slovenia Eurozone WHO 1996 28 weeks 105 5.6 1

Slovenia Eurozone WHO 1997 28 weeks 89 4.9 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 1998 22 weeks 117 6.5 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 1999 22 weeks 87 4.9 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2000 22 weeks 68 3.7 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2001 22 weeks 85 4.8 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2002 22 weeks 93 5.3 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2003 22 weeks 94 5.4 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2004 22 weeks 98 5.4 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2005 22 weeks 112 6.1 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2006 22 weeks 82 4.3 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2007 22 weeks 101 5.1 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2008 22 weeks 109 4.8 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2009 22 weeks 119 5.4 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2010 22 weeks 100 4.5 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2011 22 weeks 112 5.1 1

Page 58: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

56

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2012 22 weeks 94 4.3 1

Slovenia Demographic yearbook 2013 22 weeks 98 4.6 1

South Africa SAStatistics 1997 26 weeks 5982 6.2 2

South Africa SAStatistics 1998 26 weeks 7729 8.5 2

South Africa PPIP 1999 1000g 976 13.8 5

South Africa PPIP 1999 1000g 2413 20.4 5

South Africa SAStatistics 1999 26 weeks 11968 12.7 2

South Africa PPIP 1999 1000g 1665 19.2 4

South Africa PPIP 2000 1000g 637 28.0 5

South Africa SAStatistics 2000 26 weeks 12564 13.3 2

South Africa PPIP 2000 1000g 199 14.6 4

South Africa PPIP 2000 1000g 1149 27.4 4

South Africa PPIP 2001 1000g 970 15.6 5

South Africa PPIP 2001 1000g 2845 24.2 5

South Africa PPIP 2001 1000g 1399 26.6 5

South Africa SAStatistics 2001 26 weeks 14183 15.1 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2001 All NG 27.0 2

South Africa PPIP 2001 1000g 8962 23.1 4

South Africa SAStatistics 2002 26 weeks 13287 14.4 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2002 All NG 29.0 2

South Africa PPIP 2003 1000g 2379 35.2 5

South Africa SAStatistics 2003 26 weeks 14640 15.7 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2003 All NG 32.0 2

South Africa PPIP 2004 1000g NG 16.9 5

South Africa SAStatistics 2004 26 weeks 15821 15.5 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2004 All NG 27.0 2

South Africa PPIP 2004 1000g NG 19.4 4

South Africa PPIP 2004 1000g NG 20.2 4

South Africa SAStatistics 2005 26 weeks 13824 13.0 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2005 All NG 24.9 2

South Africa SAStatistics 2006 26 weeks 14212 13.0 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2006 All NG 23.5 2

South Africa PPIP 2006 500g 11742 24.4 4

South Africa SAStatistics 2007 26 weeks 14222 13.2 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2007 All NG 23.2 2

South Africa SAStatistics 2008 26 weeks 14626 13.4 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2008 All NG 22.5 2

South Africa PPIP 2008 1000g 18096 18.9 4

South Africa SAStatistics 2009 26 weeks 13353 13.1 2

South Africa DHIS from HSTA 2009 All NG 23.4 2

South Africa Ntuli 2009.

5 1000g 218 38.9 5

South Africa SAStatistics 2010 26 weeks 14863 14.8 2

South Africa PPIP 2010 1000g 24106 18.3 4

Page 59: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

57

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

South Africa SAStatistics 2011 26 weeks 13852 13.9 2

South Africa PPIP 2012 1000g 24554 17.6 4

Spain Eurozone WHO 1990 500g 1617 4.0 2

Spain Eurozone WHO 1991 500g 1564 3.9 2

Spain Eurozone WHO 1992 500g 1602 4.0 2

Spain Eurozone WHO 1993 500g 1439 3.7 2

Spain Eurozone WHO 1994 500g 1387 3.7 2

Spain Eurozone WHO 1995 500g 1254 3.4 2

Spain National Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks 1227 3.4 1

Spain National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks 1338 3.6 1

Spain National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks 1267 3.5 1

Spain National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks 1275 3.3 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 1295 3.2 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 1341 3.3 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 1261 3.0 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 1318 3.0 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 1265 2.8 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 1323 2.8 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 1387 2.9 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 1309 2.7 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 1413 2.7 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 1350 2.7 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 1310 2.7 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 1296 2.7 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 1265 2.8 1

Spain National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 1196 2.8 1

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1990 Not defined 1995 13.4 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1991 Not defined 1551 8.5 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1992 Not defined 1587 9.5 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1993 Not defined 1929 11.0 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1994 Not defined 1516 7.7 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1995 Not defined 1390 7.2 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1996 Not defined 1113 5.6 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1997 Not defined 1177 5.4 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1998 Not defined 1469 6.7 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 1999 Not defined 1305 6.0 2

Sri Lanka DHS survey 2003 1000g 62 8.8 3

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 1072 4.6 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 1072 4.6 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 1224 5.0 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 1108 4.7 2

Sri Lanka MOH report 2007 1000g 3184 8.8 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 1333 3.6 2

Page 60: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

58

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Sri Lanka WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 67 4.5 4

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 1149 3.0 2

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 958 2.6 2

Sri Lanka WHOMCS 2011 1000g 55 5.3 5

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 998 2.7 2

Sri Lanka WHOMCS 2011 1000g 48 6.3 4

Sri Lanka National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 972 2.7 2

Sudan Ibrahim 1990 28 weeks 150 24.1 4

Sudan Haggaz 2004 1000g 206 20.5 5

Sudan Elhassan 2005 1000g NG 28.8 5

Sudan Bader 2008 1000g NG 22.0 5

Sudan Hassan 2008 1000g 46 35.6 5

Sudan Ali 2009 1000g 44 32.8 5

Sudan Ali 2010.

5 1000g 25 30.4 4

Suriname Updated at consultation 2000 22 weeks 240 23.9 2

Suriname Updated at consultation 2003 22 weeks 248 25.1 2

Suriname Updated at consultation 2004 22 weeks 243 26.1 2

Suriname Updated at consultation 2005 22 weeks 155 17.6 2

Suriname Updated at consultation 2006 22 weeks 138 15.0 2

Suriname Updated at consultation 2008 22 weeks 212 20.6 2

Suriname Updated at consultation 2009 22 weeks 195 19.5 2

Suriname Updated at consultation 2010 22 weeks 203 20.5 2

Suriname Updated at consultation 2011 22 weeks 180 18.2 2

Swaziland DHS survey 2004 28 weeks 35 12.2 3

Swaziland Annual Health Statistics 2011 2009 Not defined NG 7.0 2

Swaziland Annual Health Statistics 2011 2010 Not defined NG 15.0 2

Swaziland Annual Health Statistics 2011 2011 Not defined 204 10.0 2

Sweden Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries 1990 1000g 393 3.2 1

Sweden Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries 1991 1000g 422 3.4 1

Sweden Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries 1992 1000g 341 2.8 1

Sweden Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries 1993 1000g 368 3.1 1

Sweden Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries 1994 1000g 322 2.9 1

Sweden Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries 1995 1000g 321 3.1 1

Sweden Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries 1996 1000g 288 3.0 1

Sweden Perinatal statistics in the Nordic countries 1997 1000g 307 3.5 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 1998 28 weeks 298 3.5 1

Page 61: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

59

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 1999 28 weeks 318 3.7 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2000 28 weeks 338 3.8 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2001 28 weeks 328 3.6 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2002 28 weeks 325 3.4 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2003 28 weeks 331 3.4 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2004 28 weeks 314 3.1 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2005 28 weeks 295 2.9 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2006 28 weeks 305 2.9 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2007 28 weeks 320 3.0 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2008 28 weeks 327 3.0 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2009 28 weeks 323 3.0 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2010 28 weeks 316 2.8 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2011 28 weeks 331 3.0 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2012 28 weeks 323 2.9 1

Sweden National Board of Health and Welfare 2013 28 weeks 319 2.8 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2005 22 weeks 307 4.2 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2006 22 weeks 342 4.6 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2007 22 weeks 297 4.0 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2008 22 weeks 341 4.4 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2009 22 weeks 345 4.4 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2010 22 weeks 346 4.3 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2011 22 weeks 349 4.3 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2012 22 weeks 350 4.2 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2013 22 weeks 402 4.8 1

Switzerland National Statistical Office 2014 22 weeks 368 4.3 1

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 1990 Not defined 3136 15.0 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 1991 Not defined 2904 13.5 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 1992 Not defined 2740 15.0 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 1993 Not defined 2234 11.8 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 1994 Not defined 2816 14.5 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 1995 Not defined NG 10.8 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 1997 Not defined NG 11.3 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 1998 Not defined NG 10.6 2

Page 62: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

60

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2001 Not defined NG 11.9 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2002 Not defined NG 11.9 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2003 Not defined NG 10.0 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2004 Not defined NG 11.7 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2005 Not defined NG 11.0 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2006 Not defined NG 11.6 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2007 Not defined 2360 11.7 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2008 Not defined 1968 9.6 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2009 Not defined 2280 11.3 2

Tajikistan DHS survey 2009 28 weeks 45 8.5 3

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2010 Not defined 2975 12.3 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2011 Not defined 2873 12.7 2

Tajikistan Eurozone WHO 2012 Not defined 2882 12.8 2

Thailand Chongsuvivatwong 1991 Not defined 36 15.3 4

Thailand Mo-suwwan 2001 Not defined NG 6.8 4

Thailand WHO Global Survey 2008 1000g 32 3.4 4

Thailand WHOMCS 2011 1000g 28 4.5 5

Thailand WHOMCS 2011 1000g 13 4.9 4

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 1994 28 weeks 330 10.4 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks 286 9.5 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks 309 10.6 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks 299 11.0 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks 303 11.2 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks 278 11.0 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 266 10.1 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 284 11.6 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 291 11.9 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 232 9.7 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 258 10.9 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 215 9.5 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 201 8.8 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 215 9.4 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 222 9.6 1

Page 63: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

61

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 226 9.5 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 211 8.6 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 202 8.8 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 184 7.7 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 196 8.4 1

Togo MOH report 2008 Not defined 3828 31.9 2

Togo MOH report 2009 Not defined 3832 31.1 2

Togo MOH report 2010 Not defined 3904 28.7 2

Togo MOH report 2011 Not defined 3900 27.0 2

Togo MOH report 2012 Not defined 4055 26.4 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1990 28 weeks 317 13.1 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1991 28 weeks 289 12.8 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1992 28 weeks 337 14.4 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1993 28 weeks 239 11.2 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1994 28 weeks 231 11.6 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1995 28 weeks 270 13.8 2

Trinidad and Tobago Bassaw 1996 500g NG 15.1 5

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1996 28 weeks 261 14.3 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1997 28 weeks 225 12.0 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1998 28 weeks 243 13.4 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 1999 28 weeks 228 12.3 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2000 28 weeks 223 12.1 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2001 28 weeks 246 13.4 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2002 28 weeks 275 15.9 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 238 13.1 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 244 14.0 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 282 16.1 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 233 12.7 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 197 10.3 2

Trinidad and Tobago National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 169 8.4 2

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2002 Not defined 1500 9.1 2

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2003 Not defined 1550 9.1 2

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2004 Not defined 1525 9.1 2

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2005 Not defined 1640 9.5 2

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2006 Not defined 1576 9.0 2

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2007 Not defined 1580 8.8 2

Tunisia Nouaili 2007.

5 22 weeks 87 11.8 5

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2008 Not defined 1582 8.6 2

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2009 Not defined 1757 9.4 2

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2010 Not defined 1995 10.1 2

Page 64: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

62

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Tunisia National Statistical Office 2011 Not defined 2074 10.2 2

Turkey DHS1993 1990 28 weeks NG 12.0 3

Turkey DHS1993 1991 28 weeks NG 19.0 3

Turkey DHS1993 1992 28 weeks NG 11.0 3

Turkey DHS1998 1996 28 weeks NG 15.0 3

Turkey Durukan 1998 500g NG 16.5 5

Turkey Ecevit A 1998 22 weeks 541 23.8 5

Turkey Erdem 1999 500g NG 18.3 5

Turkey DHS2003 2001 28 weeks NG 13.0 3

Turkey DHS2008 2006 28 weeks 27 7.7 3

Turkey Eurozone WHO 2007 Not defined 7305 5.7 2

Turkey Eurozone WHO 2008 Not defined 7229 5.6 2

Turkey Ecevit A 2009 22 weeks 302 16.3 5

Turkey Arslan 2009 22 weeks 241 9.3 4

Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute 2010 28 weeks 4807 3.8 2

Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute 2011 28 weeks 5067 4.1 2

Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute 2012 28 weeks 5054 3.9 2

Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute 2013 28 weeks 5939 4.2 2

Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute 2014 28 weeks 6569 4.6 2

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 1991 Not defined 2415 18.8 2

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 1992 Not defined 2324 17.4 2

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 1993 Not defined 2380 17.2 2

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 1994 Not defined 2233 15.6 2

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 1995 Not defined NG 15.9 2

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 1996 Not defined NG 17.1 2

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 1997 Not defined NG 21.4 2

Turkmenistan DHS survey 1998 28 weeks 46 12.7 3

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 2000 Not defined 973 10.3 2

Turkmenistan Eurozone WHO 2002 Not defined 861 9.9 2

Uganda Byaruhanga 1998 500g NG 40.9 5

Uganda DHS survey 1998 28 weeks 126 16.2 3

Uganda WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 260 37.4 5

Uganda WHO Global Survey 2004 1000g 164 25.4 4

Uganda DHS survey 2005 28 weeks 142 16.6 3

Uganda Ndyomugyeni 2005.

5 28 weeks 108 20.7 4

Uganda Nankabirwa 2006.

5 1000g 16 19.2 4

Uganda DHS survey 2008 28 weeks 165 20.0 3

Uganda Iganga HDSS- unpublished 2009 28 weeks 136 16.1 4

Uganda WHOMCS 2011 1000g 273 32.8 5

Uganda WHOMCS 2011 1000g 22 10.5 4

Uganda MOH report 2012 1000g 20224 27.8 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1990 500g 11842 17.7 2

Page 65: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

63

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1991 500g 11018 17.2 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1992 500g 10900 17.9 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1993 500g 11368 20.6 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1994 500g 11090 21.4 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1995 500g NG 20.4 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1996 500g NG 21.5 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1997 500g NG 22.4 2

Ukraine RHS survey 1997 28 weeks 14 9.0 3

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1998 500g NG 22.8 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 1999 500g NG 22.0 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2000 500g NG 20.6 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2001 500g NG 19.6 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2002 500g NG 18.5 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2003 500g NG 16.9 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2004 500g NG 15.0 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2005 500g NG 10.8 2

Ukraine RHS survey 2005 28 weeks 4 3.4 3

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2006 500g NG 9.7 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2007 500g NG 6.5 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2008 500g NG 6.5 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2009 500g 3265 6.3 2

Ukraine Eurozone WHO 2010 500g 3221 6.4 2

United Arab Emirates Al Hosani 1999 Not defined 370 7.1 2

United Arab Emirates Al Hosani 2000 Not defined 424 7.8 2

United Arab Emirates Al Hosani 2001 Not defined 485 8.4 2

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1990 28 weeks 3721 4.6 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1991 28 weeks 3747 4.7 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1992 28 weeks 3427 4.4 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1993 24 weeks 4405 5.8 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1994 24 weeks 4351 5.8 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1995 24 weeks 4141 5.6 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1996 24 weeks 4075 5.5 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1997 24 weeks 3890 5.3 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1998 24 weeks 3890 5.4 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 1999 24 weeks 3724 5.3 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2000 24 weeks NG 5.4 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2001 24 weeks NG 5.4 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2002 24 weeks NG 5.7 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2003 24 weeks NG 5.7 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2004 24 weeks NG 5.7 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2005 24 weeks NG 5.3 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2006 24 weeks NG 5.3 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2007 24 weeks NG 5.2 1

Page 66: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

64

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 2008 24 weeks NG 5.1 1

United Kingdom CMACE 2009 report 2009 28 weeks NG 3.5 4

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 2010 24 weeks 4109 5.1 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 2011 24 weeks 4201 5.2 1

United Kingdom Eurozone WHO 2012 24 weeks 3938 4.8 1

United Kingdom 3 National Statistical Offices 2013 24 weeks 3628 4.6 1

United Republic of Tanzania wort 1997 Not defined NG 24.0 5

United Republic of Tanzania AMMP - Dar 2000 1000g NG 20.3 4

United Republic of Tanzania AMMP- Hai 2000 1000g NG 24.8 4

United Republic of Tanzania AMMP- Morogoro 2000 1000g NG 25.2 4

United Republic of Tanzania Kilonzo 2000 1000g NG 38.0 4

United Republic of Tanzania Kidanto 2001 500g NG 96.1 5

United Republic of Tanzania DHS survey 2002 28 weeks 165 18.6 3

United Republic of Tanzania Abu Habib 2002.

5 28 weeks 416 28.8 5

United Republic of Tanzania Habib 2003 500g NG 28.0 5

United Republic of Tanzania Mmbaga 2005.

5 28 weeks 1219 35.9 5

United Republic of Tanzania DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 143 17.2 3

United Republic of Tanzania Sorensen 2008 Not defined 24 21.0 5

United Republic of Tanzania Msemo 2009 1000g 300 36.3 5

United Republic of Tanzania Mosha 2012 28 weeks 41 42.4 4

United States National Statistical Office 1995 1000g NG 3.6 1

United States National Statistical Office 1996 1000g NG 3.6 1

United States National Statistical Office 1997 1000g NG 3.5 1

United States National Statistical Office 1999 1000g NG 3.4 1

United States National Statistical Office 2000 1000g NG 3.3 1

United States National Statistical Office 2001 1000g NG 3.3 1

United States National Statistical Office 2002 1000g NG 3.2 1

United States National Statistical Office 2003 28 weeks 12294 3.0 1

United States National Statistical Office 2004 28 weeks 12564 3.0 1

United States National Statistical Office 2005 28 weeks 12236 2.9 1

United States National Statistical Office 2006 28 weeks 12438 2.9 1

United States National Statistical Office 2007 28 weeks 12628 2.9 1

United States National Statistical Office 2008 28 weeks 12873 3.0 1

United States National Statistical Office 2009 28 weeks 11968 2.9 1

United States National Statistical Office 2010 28 weeks 11770 2.9 1

United States National Statistical Office 2011 28 weeks 11772 3.0 1

United States National Statistical Office 2012 28 weeks 11648 2.9 1

United States National Statistical Office 2013 28 weeks 11654 3.0 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 1992 Not defined 267 4.9 2

Uruguay National Statistical Office 1993 Not defined 504 8.9 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 1994 Not defined 543 9.6 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 1995 Not defined 629 11.0 1

Page 67: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

65

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Uruguay National Statistical Office 1996 Not defined 640 10.8 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 1997 Not defined 537 9.4 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 1998 Not defined 547 9.9 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 1999 Not defined 535 9.8 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2000 Not defined 546 10.2 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2001 Not defined 500 9.5 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2002 Not defined 456 8.7 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2003 Not defined 471 9.2 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2004 Not defined 460 9.1 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2005 Not defined 395 8.3 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2006 Not defined 418 8.8 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2007 Not defined 411 8.6 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2008 Not defined 198 4.2 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2009 Not defined 308 6.5 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2010 Not defined 318 6.7 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2011 Not defined 306 6.5 1

Uruguay National Statistical Office 2012 Not defined 313 6.5 1

Venezuela Faniete 2000 500g NG 20.1 5

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2000 Not defined 4529 8.1 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2001 Not defined 4149 7.7 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2002 Not defined 3852 7.8 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2003 Not defined 4094 7.8 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2004 Not defined 3534 6.9 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2005 Not defined 3159 6.1 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2006 Not defined 2989 5.6 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2007 Not defined 2889 5.4 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2008 Not defined 2770 5.1 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2009 Not defined 2631 4.9 2

Venezuela National Statistical Office 2010 Not defined 2151 3.9 2

Viet Nam Graner 2002 500g NG 15.9 4

Viet Nam Hirst 2008 22 weeks 122 25.3 5

Viet Nam Persson 2009.

5 28 weeks 151 8.9 4

Viet Nam Bergstrom 2013 22 weeks 44 5.6 4

Yemen Banajeh 1995 500g NG 47.2 5

Zambia DHS survey 2005 28 weeks 91 13.9 3

Zambia McClure 2006 1000g 201 29.0 4

Zambia Gill 2007 28 weeks 28 18.2 4

Zambia McClure 2007.

5 1000g 433 14.1 4

Zambia Stringer 2007.

5 1000g 2109 21.0 4

Zambia Chi 2008.

5 1000g 2739 23.7 4

Zambia Turnbull 2008.

5 1000g 50 27.0 4

Page 68: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

66

Country Data Source

Year data

collection Definition

# stillbirths

Reported stillbirth

rate Data type

Zambia Saleem 2011 1000g 440 21.0 4

Zimbabwe Majoko 1996 Not defined NG 13.7 5

Zimbabwe DHS survey 1997 28 weeks 53 14.7 3

Zimbabwe Feresu 1998 500g NG 57.4 5

Zimbabwe DHS survey 2003 28 weeks 40 7.6 3

Zimbabwe HMIS 2007 500g NG 17.0 2

Zimbabwe DHS survey 2007 28 weeks 85 15.0 3

Zimbabwe Tachiweyika 2009 1000g 58 36.4 4

Footnote: NG=Not given. DHS survey=Demographic and Health survey.4 RHS survey=Reproductive Health survey.4 WHOMCS=WHO multi-country survey on Maternal and Newborn Health5. WHO Global Survey= Global survey on maternal and perinatal health.6

Summary of stillbirth rate data inputs meeting inclusion criteria by Millennium

Development Goal region

020

40

60

80

SB

R a

dju

ste

d to

28 w

ee

k d

efin

itio

n

Dev

elop

ed re

gion

Sou

ther

n Asia

Cau

casu

s an

d Cen

tral A

sia

Eas

tern

Asia

Latin

Am

erica

and

the

Car

ibbe

an

N.A

frica

and

Mid

dle

Eas

t

Sou

th-e

aste

rn A

sia

Sub

-Sah

aran

Afri

ca

Page 69: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

67

Data availability over time by region

Comparison with previous data inputs

Overall input data:

Region

Number of countries Input data points

In Region With data (number of

new countries with data since last estimates)

Previous estimates

Current estimation

exercise

% increase in data

Developed region 49 48 (2) 589 1,003 70

Southern Asia 9 8 (0) 59 171 190

Caucasus and Central 8 8 (0) 117 131 12

Eastern Asia 4 2 (0) 7 36 414

Latin America and the 33 26 (5) 155 327 111 North Africa and Middle East 18 16 (2) 82 167 104

South-eastern Asia* 25 11 (4) 44 106 141

Sub-Saharan Africa 49 38 (9) 96 266 177

Total 195 157 (22) 1149 2,207 92

* Also includes Oceania

National or Nationally representative data only: Number of countries contributing at least one national data point by region

Page 70: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

68

National routine data

(% of countries)

National representative survey

(% of countries)

Any national data

(% of countries)

Region # of countrie

s in region

2015 estimate

s

2009 estimates

2015 estimate

s

2009 estimates

2015 estimate

s

2009 estimate

s

Developed region 49 49 (100) 43 (88) 4 (8) 0 (0) 49 (100) 43 (88)

Southern Asia 9 4 (44) 2 (22) 7 (78) 3 (33) 7 (78) 4 (44)

Caucasus and Central Asia

8 7 (88) 7 (88) 5 (63) 4 (50) 8 (100) 8 (100)

Eastern Asia 4 3 (75) 1 (25) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (75) 1 (25)

Latin America 33 18 (55) 12 (37) 12 (37) 6 (18) 26 (79) 18 (55)

N.Africa and Middle East

18 12 (67) 7 (39) 4 (22) 4 (22) 16 (89) 11 (61)

South-eastern Asia 25 6 (24) 2 (8) 3 (12) 2 (8) 8 (32) 4 (16)

Sub-Saharan Africa 49 18 (37) 5 (10) 21 (43) 19 (39) 30 (61) 24 (49)

Worldwide 195 117 (60) 80 (41) 56 (29) 38 (19) 147 (75) 113 (58)

Change in number of included datapoints by region

National routine data National representative survey

Any national data

Region 2015 estimates

(% increase)

2009 estimates

2015 estimates

(% increase)

2009 estimates

2015 estimates

(% increase)

2009 estimates

Developed region 979 (67) 585 5 0 984 (68) 585

Southern Asia 40 (233) 12 16 (100) 8 56 (180) 20

Caucasus and Central Asia

122 (9) 112 9 (29) 7 131 (10) 119

Eastern Asia 23 (667) 3 0 0 23 (667) 3

Latin America 268 (97) 136 33 (200) 11 301 (105) 147

N.Africa and Middle East

134 (106) 65 17 (70) 10 151 (101) 75

South-eastern Asia 75 (150) 30 9 (80) 5 84 (140) 35

Sub-Saharan Africa 114 (293) 29 38 (46) 26 152 (176) 55

Worldwide 1755 (81) 972 127 (90) 67 1882 (81) 1039

Quality categorisation of national routine data National level data were assessed as high quality using the following criteria:

CRVS strength CRVS capture of perinatal events Completeness of data

VR is considered ‘good quality’ for the purposes of maternal death reporting

Stillbirth rate (adjusted to 28 week definition): national UN-IGME NMR ratio >0.5 for all years

Earliest year of data available is before 2005

For given year female child mortality capture>85%

Latest year of data available is after 2010.

Number of years of data >0.5 *(max year – min year + 1).

Page 71: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

69

High quality data with partial time series were data fulfilling all above, apart from first and last data year. Low quality routine data included all other CRVS data points fulfilling overall inclusion criteria, but not meeting above criteria. Table of countries with female child mortality>85%:

Aruba Finland Malta

Anguilla Fiji Myanmar

Andorra France Montenegro

Argentina United Kingdom Montserrat

Antigua and Barbuda Greece Mauritius

Australia Grenada Malaysia

Austria China, Hong Kong SAR Netherlands

Belgium Croatia Norway

Bulgaria Hungary New Zealand

Bahrain Ireland Oman

Bahamas Iran (Islamic Republic of) Poland

Bosnia and Herzegovina Iraq Puerto Rico

Belize Iceland Portugal

Barbados Israel Romania

Brunei Darussalam Italy Russian Federation

Canada Jordan Sao Tome and Principe

Switzerland Japan Slovakia

Chile Saint Kitts and Nevis Slovenia

Cape Verde Republic of Korea Sweden

Costa Rica Kuwait Seychelles

Cuba Libya Syrian Arab Republic

Czech Republic Saint Lucia Tonga

Germany Sri Lanka Tunisia

Dominica Lithuania Turkey

Denmark Luxembourg Taiwan

Algeria Latvia Uruguay

Egypt Madagascar United States of America

Spain Maldives Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Estonia The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)

Page 72: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

70

Table of countries with higher quality national routine data

Argentina Germany Norway

Australia Greece Poland

Austria Hungary Portugal

Bahamas Iceland Republic of Korea

Bahrain Ireland Romania

Belgium Israel Russian Federation

Bulgaria Italy Saint Lucia

Canada Japan Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Chile Kuwait Slovakia

Costa Rica Latvia Slovenia

Croatia Lithuania Spain

Cuba Luxembourg Sweden

Czech Republic Malta Switzerland

Denmark Mauritius TFYR Macedonia

Estonia Mexico United Kingdom

Finland Netherlands United States of America

France New Zealand Uruguay

Predictor variables

Identification of predictor variables for model input Plausible covariates associated with stillbirth rate, were identified from the published literature.

These included distal determinants such as socio-economic factors, interacting and overlapping

demographic and biomedical factors, associated perinatal outcome markers and access to health

care:

Page 73: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

71

A comparable, complete time series for all countries for 1990 – 2015 was required for inclusion in

the model, thus limiting the number of predictors that it was possible to test. Possible predictors

were grouped into four categories: ‘Socio-economic indicators’, ‘Maternal demographic and

biomedical associated factors’, ‘Perinatal outcome indicators’, ‘Access to health care indicators’.

Socio-economic indicators Maternal demographic and biomedical associated indicators

Perinatal outcome

indicators

Access to health care

indicators

GINI co-efficient Maternal NCDs Maternal Mortality Ratio Proportion c-section

% population urban GFR NMR Protected at birth

GNI Malaria PFPR/ ITN coverage Low Birthweight rate* ANC1/ ANC4

Mean years female education % mothers over 35 Preterm birth rates Skilled attendant at

birth

MDG region

Adolescent fertility rate Rates of congenital

abnormalities

Legal status of

abortion

World bank region Adult female obesity

Syphilis Index

* low birthweight rate includes all livebirths with a birthweight of <2500g – and hence is a composite outcome marker for

fetal health, including both fetal or intra-uterine growth restriction and/ or preterm births.

Indicators in bold had data or estimates available for all countries for all years 2000 – 2015 and were tested in the model

fitting process.

The syphilis index was created to include 3 categories: syphilis prevalence<1%, syphilis prevalence 1 – 5%, and syphilis

prevalence>5% based on WHO worldwide estimates of syphilis prevalence in pregnancy.7

Logarithmic transformations were performed based on the observed relationship between the

stillbirth rates and the predictor of interest untransformed or transformed – if the relationship

between the transformed covariate and the rate was more linear than the relationship between the

untransformed covariate, the transformation was included.

Source of potential predictor variables tested in models Predictor Source Notes on Methodology

Low birthweight rate World Bank1, including data from MICS/ DHS surveys and CRVS data

For missing years of data, linear interpolation was used. Extrapolated assuming a flat trend

General fertility rate (GFR) Maternal mortality estimation inter-agency group (MMEIG)

Malaria PFPR/ITN coverage Malaria Atlas Project2

Adolescent fertility rate World Health Organization3

Adult female obesity Institute of Health Metrics Evaluation5

Syphilis index Newman et al7 (see above)

Neonatal mortality rate (NMR) Inter-agency group for mortality estimation (IGME) 2014

Projection

Proportion c-section World Health Organization3

Protected at birth World Health Organization3

ANC1/ANC4 World Health Organization3 Extrapolated assuming a flat trend

Page 74: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

72

Predictor Source Notes on Methodology

Skilled attendant at birth World Health Organization3 Extrapolated assuming a flat trend

GINI co-efficient World Bank1

% population urban World Bank1

Gross national income (GNI) World Bank1 For missing years of data, linear interpolation was used. Extrapolated with regression on GDP

Mean years female education United Nations population division (UNDP)4 For missing years of data, linear interpolation was used. Extrapolated assuming a flat trend

MDG region http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

World bank region World Bank1 1The World Bank (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator) 2Malaria Atlas Project (http://www.map.ox.ac.uk/ ) 3WHO Global Health Observatory (http://www.who.int/gho/en/) 4UN Population Division (http://esa.un.org/wpp/ ) 5IHME global data exchange (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/ihme_data)

Data adjustments:

Small countries For countries with time series of civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) stillbirth rate data and

large year on year variation in stillbirth rates (coefficients of variation >10%) due to small birth

cohorts, data were smoothed using a rolling average.

Countries where adjustments applied:

Adjusted with 3 years rolling average Adjusted with 5 years rolling average

Cook Islands Andorra Luxembourg Iceland Malta

Non-standard definitions in Developed Region For countries in the developed region, without own country data to inform the relationship between

stillbirth rates using the given definition, and the ≥28 week definition, the data were adjusted based

on meta-analyses of data from countries in the region with data.

Adjusting for 1000g to ≥28 week definition Data reporting 1000g cut off were adjusted using a meta analysis of 26 population based inputs from

23 HIC countries, including 6,839,018 births:

Page 75: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

73

Adjusting for ≥24 weeks to ≥28 weeks definition Data reporting ≥24 week cut off were adjusted using a meta analysis of 4 population based inputs

from 4 HIC countries, including 5,694,803 births (24,964 stillbirths):

Overall

Study

Portugal

Belgium: Flanders

Slovenia

Estonia

Germany

Luxembourg

USA

Slovak Republic

UK: Scotland

Malta

Ireland

Finland

Belgium: Brussels

France

Poland

Latvia

Norway

The Netherlands

UK: Northern Ireland

Lithuania

Czech Republic

UK: England and Wales

Austria

Hungary

Sweden

ID

Spain: Valencia

1.15 (1.13, 1.17)

1.02 (0.87, 1.20)

1.07 (0.86, 1.32)

1.02 (0.72, 1.44)

0.90 (0.48, 1.70)

1.07 (1.00, 1.14)

1.13 (0.54, 2.38)

1.21 (1.18, 1.24)

1.02 (0.76, 1.38)

1.13 (0.94, 1.35)

1.00 (0.49, 2.04)

1.12 (0.94, 1.34)

1.04 (0.80, 1.34)

1.32 (0.88, 2.00)

1.18 (0.84, 1.67)

1.07 (0.99, 1.15)

1.03 (0.78, 1.37)

1.03 (0.83, 1.29)

1.13 (1.02, 1.26)

1.04 (0.76, 1.41)

1.03 (0.79, 1.33)

0.94 (0.78, 1.12)

1.12 (1.06, 1.19)

1.07 (0.87, 1.30)

1.05 (0.90, 1.22)

1.10 (0.94, 1.29)

RR (95% CI)

1.05 (0.84, 1.32)

100.00

%

1.57

0.88

0.34

0.11

8.41

0.07

52.08

0.46

1.17

0.08

1.29

0.62

0.21

0.33

6.88

0.52

0.86

3.69

0.44

0.62

1.36

12.80

1.00

1.84

1.57

Weight

0.79

1.15 (1.13, 1.17)

1.02 (0.87, 1.20)

1.07 (0.86, 1.32)

1.02 (0.72, 1.44)

0.90 (0.48, 1.70)

1.07 (1.00, 1.14)

1.13 (0.54, 2.38)

1.21 (1.18, 1.24)

1.02 (0.76, 1.38)

1.13 (0.94, 1.35)

1.00 (0.49, 2.04)

1.12 (0.94, 1.34)

1.04 (0.80, 1.34)

1.32 (0.88, 2.00)

1.18 (0.84, 1.67)

1.07 (0.99, 1.15)

1.03 (0.78, 1.37)

1.03 (0.83, 1.29)

1.13 (1.02, 1.26)

1.04 (0.76, 1.41)

1.03 (0.79, 1.33)

0.94 (0.78, 1.12)

1.12 (1.06, 1.19)

1.07 (0.87, 1.30)

1.05 (0.90, 1.22)

1.10 (0.94, 1.29)

RR (95% CI)

1.05 (0.84, 1.32)

100.00

%

1.57

0.88

0.34

0.11

8.41

0.07

52.08

0.46

1.17

0.08

1.29

0.62

0.21

0.33

6.88

0.52

0.86

3.69

0.44

0.62

1.36

12.80

1.00

1.84

1.57

Weight

0.79

1.25 .5 .75 1 1.5 2

Relative Risk Stillbirth

Page 76: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

74

Adjusting for ≥22 weeks to ≥28 weeks definition Data reporting ≥22 week cut off were adjusted using a meta analysis of 139 population based inputs,

including 30,120,462 births (154,584 stillbirths):

RR=1.47 (1.46 – 1.47)

Adjusting for ≥20 weeks to ≥28 weeks definition Data reporting ≥20 week cut off were adjusted using a meta analysis of 56 population based inputs,

including 14,134,226 births (92,289 stillbirths):

RR=2.19 (2.17 – 2.22)

Adjusting for ‘all fetal deaths’ to ≥28 weeks definition Data reporting ‘all fetal deaths’ were adjusted using a meta analysis of 74 population based inputs,

including 13,890,261 births (105,113 stillbirths):

RR=1.51 (1.50 – 1.52)

These data suggest in practice similar to 22 week. Countries included in this analysis were Argentina,

Chile, Malta and Slovakia that plausibly had lower capture below 22 weeks. Also Portugal – where

only stillbirths at >24 weeks are required legally to be registered. Below this threshold registration is

voluntary.

Adjusting where no definition is given For countries in the developed region, where no definition was given it was assumed to have used a

≥22 week cut off and adjusted accordingly.

Data reporting using 25 or 26 week definitions were dropped as no adjustment factor was available.

Page 77: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

75

Table - summary of adjustments:

Stated definition # country data

years #stillbirths (# births)

Adjustment factor

95% confidence interval

≥28 weeks - - 1 (baseline) - ≥1000g

26 25,986

(6,839,018) 1.15 1.13 -1.17

≥24 weeks 4

24,964 (5,694,803)

0.72 0.71-0.74

≥22 weeks 139

154,584 (30,120,462)

0.68 0.68-0.69

≥20 weeks 56

92,289 (14,134,226)

0.46 0.45-0.46

All fetal deaths 74

105,113 (13,890,261)

0.66 0.66-0.67

The adjusted stillbirth rate is calculated as the reported stillbirth rate multiplied by the adjustment

factor. For example a data source reporting a stillbirth rate of 6.2 using the ≥22 week definition

would be adjusted as follows: 6.2*0.68 = 4.2 stillbirths ≥28 weeks per 1,000 total births.

The most commonly reported stillbirth definition in this region is the ≥22 week definition. For

countries in this region reporting stillbirth rates without a definition, it is assumed that the ≥22 week

definition is used and adjusted accordingly.

Note on data adjustments:

The relationship is highly dependent upon whether definitions include TOP or not and the capture of

stillbirths at the lower gestations. Ideally the analysis would have been undertaken separately based

on TOP policy and practice – however, insufficient data were available to inform this analysis.

Non-standard definitions in Other Regions For countries outside the developed region, no country had own country data available to inform

the relationship between stillbirth rates using the given definition, and the ≥28 week definition.

Therefore stillbirth rates using non-standard definitions were adjusted using facility based data

collected for the WHO GS and WHO MCS surveys.

Stated definition # country data

years #stillbirths (# births)

Adjustment factor

95% confidence interval

≥28 weeks or ≥1000g*

- - 1 (baseline) -

≥22 weeks or ≥500g*

96 11,911

(598,386) 0.89 0.87-0.91

*Many data sources report using birthweight rather than gestational age. Data were only available

for adjustment from ≥500g to ≥1000g, for the purposes of these estimates, it is assumed that these

approximate to the gestational age equivalents.

The most commonly reported stillbirth definition in this region is the ≥28 week definition (or

birthweight equivalent). No strong evidence of a difference between stillbirth rates was found

between studies in these regions using the 28 week definition and those providing no details of the

Page 78: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

76

gestational age or weight cut off used to define stillbirth (p<0.05). It was therefore assumed that the

28 week cut off was used in these cases. Data from demographic and health, and reproductive

health surveys report fetal deaths after the 7 month of pregnancy, using pregnancy or birth history

questionnaires. Reported fetal deaths at ≥7 months is used to approximate to ≥28 weeks.

Implausibility criteria In general, capture and reporting of stillbirths are more problematic than the capture of deaths in

liveborn neonates (and neonatal deaths are more challenging to capture than deaths in older

children or adults). Hence, under-ascertainment of stillbirths is a common problem across data

sources, especially when close to the threshold of viability or the threshold of reporting, for example

fetal deaths are more commonly coded as miscarriages when the health provider assesses the baby

to be below the limits of viability. In many high income countries this may affect fetal deaths

especially at 22 and 23 weeks gestation, in lower resource settings, without neonatal intensive care,

fetal deaths up to 30 weeks gestation may not be included in stillbirth figures.

We excluded datapoints likely to reflect poor case ascertainment based on conservative

‘implausibility’ criteria.

Model selection All identified predictor variables with full time series were included in the initial model. For

continuous variables, a univariate analysis was undertaken to identify whether the relationship

between the ln_sbr and the predictor was best described using a ln transformation, or using the

non-transformed predictor. For all variables the BIC was calculated. Predictors were retained when

the direction of the coefficient was plausible. General fertility rate, caesarean section group, and

syphilis were dropped as the direction of the coefficients were not plausible.

We sought to maximise the predicting power of the model, whilst reducing the noise within the

model from a large number of predictors. We removed one predictor at a time from the model,

commencing with the predictor with the largest BIC on univariate analysis, and re-fitted the model. If

the model was improved by removing this predictor (lower BIC compared to the model containing

the predictor), the predictor was dropped from the model. If the BIC was higher, the predictor was

retained. The p.falciparum parasite, gini index, skilled birth attendant, female obesity, proportion of

the population that are urban and protected at birth against tetanus were dropped as a result of

this process.

Effect of dropping predictor

Outcome BIC

Full Model

- 399.1

Dropping gini Improved BIC Dropped from model 380.9

Dropping malaria Improved BIC Dropped from model 378.2

Dropping syphilis index Improved BIC Dropped from model 357.7

Dropping lbw Worsened BIC Retained in model 360.5

Dropping region Worsened BIC Retained in model 362.6

Dropping Skilled Birth Attendance

Improved BIC Dropped from model 344.5

Dropping study type (context) Worsened BIC Retained in model 562.5

Dropping Obesity Improved BIC Dropped from model 339.7

Page 79: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

77

Dropping urban Improved BIC Dropped from model 320.8

Dropping Protected at birth Improved BIC Dropped from model 308.6

Dropping ANC Worsened BIC Retained in model 310.2

Dropping mean female education

Worsened BIC Retained in model 310.4

Dropping GNI Worsened BIC Retained in model 317.3

Dropping NMR Worsened BIC Retained in model 499.4

Final model 308.6

The final model included ln neonatal mortality rate, ln low birthweight, ln Gross National Income,

mean years of female education, coverage of 4 antenatal care visits, data type and region

Final model equation Log(Stillbirth rateij) = a + b(log(NMRij)) + c(log(LBWij)) + d(log(GNIij)) + e(mean_eduij) + f(ANC4ij) +

g(regionij) + h(datatypeij) + uj + eij

b() c() d() e() and f()represent functions each involving 2 parameters,

g() indicates a 3 parameter function associated with 3 dummy variables representing different

millennium development goal regionsh() indicates a 5 parameter function associated with 5 dummy

variables representing different data types (see paper for details)

uj represent country-specific random effects, assumed to be independent normally distributed with

constant variance

eij represent individual data point-level residuals, assumed to be independent normally distributed

with constant variance

Page 80: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

78

Figure: Diagnostic plots for the stillbirth prediction regression model

01

23

45

Obse

rved

ln(S

BR

)

0 1 2 3 4 5Predicted ln(SBR)

-1.5

-1-.

50

.51

1.5

Resid

uals

0 1 2 3 4Predicted ln(SBR)

Page 81: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

79

0.5

11

.5

Den

sity

-1 -.5 0 .5 1Estimated country-level random effects

0.5

11

.52

2.5

Den

sity

-1.5 -1 -.5 0 .5 1 1.5Residual ln(SBR) (observed-predicted)

Page 82: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

80

Loess region plots for countries using own data

Argentina

Australia

45

67

8

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

2.6

2.8

33

.23

.4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

Page 83: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

81

Austria

Bulgaria

3.5

44

.55

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8333333

Lowess smoother6

78

91

0

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8333333

Lowess smoother

Page 84: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

82

Chile

Costa Rica

34

56

7

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

5.6

5.8

66

.26

.4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

Page 85: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

83

Croatia

Cuba

22

.53

3.5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother6

78

91

01

1

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

Page 86: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

84

Czech Republic

Denmark

2.4

2.6

2.8

33

.23

.4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

1.5

22

.53

3.5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

Page 87: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

85

Estonia

Finland

23

45

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8333333

Lowess smoother

1.8

22

.22

.42

.6

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8333333

Lowess smoother

Page 88: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

86

Germany

Hungary

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

3.4

3.6

3.8

44

.24

.4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8333333

Lowess smoother

Page 89: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

87

Iceland

Ireland

11

.52

2.5

3

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

2.5

33

.54

4.5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

Page 90: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

88

Israel

Italy

3.5

44

.55

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8

Lowess smoother3

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

Page 91: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

89

Japan

Kuwait

22

.22

.42

.62

.83

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother5

5.5

66

.57

7.5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

Page 92: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

90

Latvia

Lithuania

3.5

44

.55

5.5

6

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother3

45

6

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

Page 93: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

91

Luxembourg

Macedonia

2.5

33

.54

4.5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8

Lowess smoother8

91

01

11

2

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

Page 94: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

92

Malta

Mauritius

2.5

33

.54

4.5

5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother6

81

01

21

4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

Page 95: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

93

Netherlands

New Zealand

23

45

6

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother2

2.5

33

.54

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

Page 96: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

94

Norway

Poland

22

.53

3.5

4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

2.5

33

.54

4.5

5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8333333

Lowess smoother

Page 97: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

95

Portugal

Romania

22

.53

3.5

4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8333333

Lowess smoother4

56

7

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .9615385

Lowess smoother

Page 98: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

96

Russia

Slovakia

45

67

8

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8

Lowess smoother3

3.5

44

.5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8333333

Lowess smoother

Page 99: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

97

Slovenia

Spain

2.5

33

.54

4.5

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

2.6

2.8

33

.23

.4

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

Page 100: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

98

Sweden

United Kingdom

2.8

33

.23

.43

.63

.8

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother3

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8928571

Lowess smoother

Page 101: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

99

United States of America

Calculation of stillbirth numbers Live birth estimates from the World Population Prospects: the 2015 revision8 were used to convert the stillbirth rate to the number of stillbirths using the formula: Number of stillbirths = (stillbirth rate*number of livebirths)/(1-stillbirth rate).

Uncertainty estimation Estimates of uncertainty were generated by drawing 1000 bootstrap samples from the estimation

dataset and using the parameter estimates obtained from each bootstrap sample to generate a new

set of predictions including the estimate of the variance of the country-specific random effects. We

used this estimate of the between country variance to draw, at random, a random effect for

countries not included in the bootstrap sample assuming that the random effects are normally

distributed with mean zero and variance equal to that estimated from the model. To obtain

worldwide and regional level estimates of uncertainty, we summed the data at worldwide or

regional level for each bootstrap prediction run and used the 2.5th and 97.5th centiles of the

resulting distributions around the estimated number of preterm births by country. Because about

half of the modelled countries had a country-specific random effect generated at random for each

bootstrap prediction, some of which were positive and others negative, the relative uncertainty at

the regional and worldwide level tends to be less than that at the individual country level.

For countries with high quality vital registration and with data on reported rates fulfilling the criteria

for high quality VR, we assumed that the standard error of the reported number of stillbirths was the

square root of the reported number (i.e., to follow a poisson distribution).

2.9

2.9

5

3

3.0

53

.1

sb

r28

a

2000 2005 2010 2015year

bandwidth = .8

Lowess smoother

Page 102: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

100

Results

Table: Estimated stillbirth rate by country for 2000 and 2015

Country

Stillbirth rate 2000

Number of

stillbirths 2000

Stillbirth rate 2015

Number of

stillbirths 2015

2000-2015

ARR % Source of estimate

Afghanistan 35.7 34794 26.7 28056 -1.9 Modelled estimate

Albania 5.8 300 4 180 -2.4 Modelled estimate

Algeria 26.0 15141 19.3 18774 -2 Modelled estimate

Andorra 2.1 1 1.6 1 -1.9 Modelled estimate

Angola 34.3 26201 27.3 30655 -1.5 Modelled estimate

Antigua and Barbuda 8.6 14 6.4 10 -1.9 Modelled estimate

Argentina 7.3 5095 4.6 3499 -3.1 Adjusted national data

Armenia 21.0 758 13.8 568 -2.8 Modelled estimate

Australia 3.4 821 2.7 813 -1.4 Adjusted national data

Austria 4.7 339 3.6 300 -1.6 Adjusted national data

Azerbaijan 25.2 3232 16.5 3925 -2.8 Modelled estimate

Bahamas 10.9 57 10.3 60 -0.4 Modelled estimate

Bahrain 9.5 121 5.5 121 -3.5 Modelled estimate

Bangladesh 42.3 160295 25.4 83060 -3.4 Modelled estimate

Barbados 9.0 32 8.5 29 -0.4 Modelled estimate

Belarus 5.6 521 3 373 -4.2 Modelled estimate

Belgium 3.5 385 3 382 -1.1 Modelled estimate

Belize 11.2 86 9.8 83 -0.9 Modelled estimate

Benin 36.1 10720 30.3 11746 -1.2 Modelled estimate

Bhutan 26.9 437 16 200 -3.4 Modelled estimate

Bolivia 17.7 4572 12.9 3209 -2.1 Modelled estimate

Bosnia and Herzegovina 6.7 328 5.4 170 -1.4 Modelled estimate

Botswana 17.5 840 15.2 895 -0.9 Modelled estimate

Brazil 12.1 46695 8.6 27808 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Brunei Darussalam 6.9 47 6.5 50 -0.4 Modelled estimate

Bulgaria 8.5 565 5.7 345 -2.6 Adjusted national data

Burkina Faso 29.4 15570 21.2 14911 -2.1 Modelled estimate

Burundi 35.9 10299 26.6 12661 -2 Modelled estimate

Cabo Verde 19.4 249 14.3 158 -2 Modelled estimate

Cambodia 20.8 6606 11.9 4311 -3.6 Modelled estimate

Cameroon 24.1 15570 19.6 16365 -1.4 Modelled estimate

Canada 3.5 1138 3.1 1162 -0.8 Modelled estimate

Central African Republic 37.3 5616 34.4 5843 -0.6 Modelled estimate

Chad 41.4 17490 39.9 25170 -0.2 Modelled estimate

Chile 3.9 996 3.1 716 -1.6 Adjusted national data

China 14.5 230279 7.2 122341 -4.6 Modelled estimate

Colombia 10.9 8992 8.1 6089 -2 Modelled estimate

Comoros 34.5 725 30.5 824 -0.8 Modelled estimate

Congo 21.0 2518 15.1 2504 -2.2 Modelled estimate

Page 103: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

101

Country

Stillbirth rate 2000

Number of

stillbirths 2000

Stillbirth rate 2015

Number of

stillbirths 2015

2000-2015

ARR % Source of estimate

Cook Islands 11.9 5 8.7 3 -2.1 Modelled estimate

Costa Rica 6.1 481 6 409 -0.1 Adjusted national data

Côte d'Ivoire 31.8 21833 26.7 22769 -1.2 Modelled estimate

Croatia 3.6 193 2 75 -3.9 Adjusted national data

Cuba 11.0 1720 6.2 726 -3.8 Adjusted national data

Cyprus 5.1 64 3.6 47 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Czech Republic 3.3 234 2.5 234 -1.8 Adjusted national data

Democratic People's Republic of Korea 19.4 7699 13.5 5161 -2.4 Modelled estimate

Democratic Republic of the Congo 34.2 76133 27.3 87780 -1.5 Modelled estimate

Denmark 3.4 216 1.7 90 -4.4 Adjusted national data

Djibouti 43.7 996 34.6 791 -1.6 Modelled estimate

Dominica 10.8 11 11.6 13 0.5 Modelled estimate

Dominican Republic 13.3 2780 11.1 2426 -1.2 Modelled estimate

Ecuador 10.9 3475 7.7 2531 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Egypt 18.0 31325 12.2 34656 -2.5 Modelled estimate

El Salvador 17.3 2457 12.2 1286 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Equatorial Guinea 21.2 444 16.2 469 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Eritrea 27.8 3546 22.5 3826 -1.4 Modelled estimate

Estonia 4.2 52 2.7 32 -3.1 Adjusted national data

Ethiopia 39.1 118872 29.7 96531 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Fiji 14.1 280 11.9 206 -1.1 Modelled estimate

Finland 2.7 138 1.8 107 -2.4 Adjusted national data

France 5.5 4196 4.7 3719 -1 Modelled estimate

Gabon 16.9 689 14 729 -1.3 Modelled estimate

Gambia 30.7 1719 23.9 2020 -1.7 Modelled estimate

Georgia 18.6 969 11.2 644 -3.3 Modelled estimate

Germany 2.7 2182 2.4 1680 -0.6 Adjusted national data

Ghana 29.6 19054 22.7 20841 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Greece 4.7 493 3.6 378 -1.9 Modelled estimate

Grenada 9.0 20 8 16 -0.8 Modelled estimate

Guatemala 16.9 6832 11.9 5362 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Guinea 27.1 10037 21.1 9856 -1.6 Modelled estimate

Guinea-Bissau 52.5 2834 36.7 2482 -2.4 Modelled estimate

Guyana 19.8 374 17.2 301 -0.9 Modelled estimate

Haiti 28.6 7835 24.9 6578 -0.9 Modelled estimate

Honduras 17.7 3533 12.6 2074 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Hungary 4.2 360 3.7 320 -0.9 Adjusted national data

Iceland 2.9 11 1.3 5 -5.4 Adjusted national data

India 33.3 957939 23 592086 -2.4 Modelled estimate

Indonesia 17.7 78240 13.2 73435 -1.9 Modelled estimate

Iran (Islamic Republic of) 9.4 12224 6.4 8726 -2.5 Modelled estimate

Iraq 19.6 16932 15.5 19285 -1.5 Modelled estimate

Ireland 4.6 276 2.7 183 -3.5 Adjusted national data

Page 104: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

102

Country

Stillbirth rate 2000

Number of

stillbirths 2000

Stillbirth rate 2015

Number of

stillbirths 2015

2000-2015

ARR % Source of estimate

Israel 4.8 635 4.2 737 -0.9 Adjusted national data

Italy 4.0 2046 3.3 1592 -1.1 Adjusted national data

Jamaica 21.0 1232 18.8 766 -0.7 Modelled estimate

Japan 3.1 3630 2.1 2172 -2.6 Adjusted national data

Jordan 13.0 1964 10.5 2183 -1.4 Modelled estimate

Kazakhstan 11.1 2356 6.5 2556 -3.5 Modelled estimate

Kenya 26.4 31695 22.5 34985 -1.1 Modelled estimate

Kiribati 18.5 49 16.3 47 -0.8 Modelled estimate

Kuwait 6.6 305 5.1 354 -1.7 Adjusted national data

Kyrgyzstan 13.8 1520 10.2 1783 -2 Modelled estimate

Lao People's Democratic Republic 31.6 5264 23.7 4214 -1.9 Modelled estimate

Latvia 5.3 97 3.6 57 -2.6 Adjusted national data

Lebanon 13.9 863 9.9 1020 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Lesotho 24.2 1461 19.5 1245 -1.4 Modelled estimate

Liberia 31.5 3944 21.4 3309 -2.5 Modelled estimate

Libya 12.5 1518 8.8 1101 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Lithuania 5.8 203 3.2 105 -3.8 Adjusted national data

Luxembourg 3.9 21 2.8 19 -2.1 Adjusted national data

Madagascar 21.5 14146 18.2 15235 -1.1 Modelled estimate

Malawi 28.7 14027 21.8 14036 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Malaysia 8.0 4459 5.8 3242 -2.1 Modelled estimate

Maldives 19.2 121 7.7 61 -5.9 Modelled estimate

Mali 44.0 23313 32.5 24410 -2 Modelled estimate

Malta 4.9 23 3.5 13 -2.3 Adjusted national data

Marshall Islands 16.9 39 15.6 21 -0.5 Modelled estimate

Mauritania 32.5 3396 27.1 3659 -1.2 Modelled estimate

Mauritius 13.1 224 9.5 136 -2.1 Adjusted national data

Mexico 7.0 17527 5.5 13093 -1.6 Modelled estimate

Micronesia (Federated States of) 20.7 69 17.8 45 -1 Modelled estimate

Monaco 8.4 2 5.7 3 -2.6 Modelled estimate

Mongolia 12.4 604 7.3 522 -3.5 Modelled estimate

Montenegro 5.9 50 3.9 27 -2.8 Modelled estimate

Morocco 33.8 21334 24.5 18144 -2.1 Modelled estimate

Mozambique 27.1 22164 19.1 20724 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Myanmar 29.8 35573 20 18745 -2.6 Modelled estimate

Namibia 13.2 765 11.3 850 -1.1 Modelled estimate

Nauru 17.8 3 15.5 2 -0.9 Modelled estimate

Nepal 28.0 22101 18.4 10332 -2.8 Modelled estimate

Netherlands 5.3 1018 1.8 329 -6.8 Adjusted national data

New Zealand 3.5 185 2.3 134 -2.8 Adjusted national data

Nicaragua 10.9 1495 7.4 895 -2.5 Modelled estimate

Niger 39.0 23257 36.7 36216 -0.4 Modelled estimate

Nigeria 52.3 278524 42.9 313706 -1.3 Modelled estimate

Page 105: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

103

Country

Stillbirth rate 2000

Number of

stillbirths 2000

Stillbirth rate 2015

Number of

stillbirths 2015

2000-2015

ARR % Source of estimate

Niue 11.4 0 9.7 0 -1 Modelled estimate

Norway 3.7 215 2.2 133 -3.4 Adjusted national data

Occupied Palestinian Territory 9.6 1149 7.5 1131 -1.7 Modelled estimate

Oman 9.9 549 8.5 691 -1.1 Modelled estimate

Pakistan 53.3 252258 43.1 242556 -1.4 Modelled estimate

Palau 10.1 3 8.4 3 -1.2 Modelled estimate

Panama 8.7 639 6.1 464 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Papua New Guinea 18.8 3585 15.9 3383 -1.1 Modelled estimate

Paraguay 18.8 2813 13.4 1832 -2.2 Modelled estimate

Peru 13.7 8505 9 5623 -2.8 Modelled estimate

Philippines 14.3 33182 10.9 25811 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Poland 4.7 1666 2.3 851 -4.5 Adjusted national data

Portugal 3.7 401 2.2 182 -3.5 Adjusted national data

Qatar 7.5 91 5.8 165 -1.7 Modelled estimate

Republic of Korea 2.8 1420 2.1 980 -1.7 Modelled estimate

Republic of Moldova 10.3 491 7.9 342 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Romania 6.8 1814 4.1 690 -3.2 Adjusted national data

Russian Federation 7.7 11462 4.5 8747 -3.6 Adjusted national data

Rwanda 27.1 9825 17.3 5925 -2.9 Modelled estimate

Saint Kitts and Nevis 9.5 10 7.5 7 -1.5 Modelled estimate

Saint Lucia 12.9 40 12.1 34 -0.4 Modelled estimate

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 12.3 27 10.7 18 -0.9 Modelled estimate

Samoa 12.0 61 11.1 50 -0.5 Modelled estimate

San Marino 2.7 1 2.5 1 -0.6 Modelled estimate

Sao Tome and Principe 24.3 131 16.3 105 -2.6 Modelled estimate

Saudi Arabia 18.9 10984 13.9 8702 -2 Modelled estimate

Senegal 34.7 13687 24.5 14540 -2.3 Modelled estimate

Serbia 7.8 1003 6 554 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Seychelles 11.4 16 9.5 16 -1.2 Modelled estimate

Sierra Leone 39.1 7070 24.4 5447 -3.1 Modelled estimate

Singapore 3.5 150 2.6 137 -2.1 Modelled estimate

Slovakia 3.9 196 2.9 159 -1.9 Adjusted national data

Slovenia 2.7 50 2.9 63 0.5 Adjusted national data

Solomon Islands 19.7 277 17.6 298 -0.7 Modelled estimate

Somalia 39.2 14593 35.5 16400 -0.7 Modelled estimate

South Africa 22.4 26862 17.4 17985 -1.7 Modelled estimate

South Sudan 35.9 10521 30.1 13429 -1.2 Modelled estimate

Spain 3.3 1238 2.9 1068 -0.9 Adjusted national data

Sri Lanka 7.5 2549 4.9 1530 -2.9 Modelled estimate

Sudan 29.2 32419 24.4 32338 -1.2 Modelled estimate

Suriname 24.0 265 19.3 193 -1.4 Modelled estimate

Swaziland 15.9 537 12.3 457 -1.7 Modelled estimate

Sweden 3.8 270 2.8 323 -1.9 Adjusted national data

Page 106: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

104

Country

Stillbirth rate 2000

Number of

stillbirths 2000

Stillbirth rate 2015

Number of

stillbirths 2015

2000-2015

ARR % Source of estimate

Switzerland 3.2 246 2.8 241 -0.9 Modelled estimate

Syrian Arab Republic 14.5 7755 11.1 4777 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Tajikistan 19.0 3702 14 3799 -2 Modelled estimate

Thailand 7.7 6948 5 3697 -2.9 Modelled estimate

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 10.8 281 7.7 192 -2.2 Adjusted national data

Timor-Leste 26.3 1068 17.8 943 -2.6 Modelled estimate

Togo 44.2 8614 34.2 8865 -1.7 Modelled estimate

Tonga 9.2 24 8.6 22 -0.5 Modelled estimate

Trinidad and Tobago 17.6 330 11.1 212 -3 Modelled estimate

Tunisia 14.8 2538 9.2 1944 -3.1 Modelled estimate

Turkey 12.7 18239 7 9914 -3.9 Modelled estimate

Turkmenistan 22.4 2053 17 1977 -1.8 Modelled estimate

Tuvalu 17.0 5 13.8 3 -1.4 Modelled estimate

Uganda 29.4 33032 21 34151 -2.2 Modelled estimate

Ukraine 12.3 5003 8.8 3841 -2.2 Modelled estimate

United Arab Emirates 8.9 452 7.4 719 -1.2 Modelled estimate

United Kingdom 3.7 2511 2.9 2237 -1.4 Adjusted national data

United Republic of Tanzania 31.6 43764 22.4 47060 -2.3 Modelled estimate

United States of America 3.1 11612 3 11261 -0.4 Adjusted national data

Uruguay 8.5 450 6.6 318 -1.7 Modelled estimate

Uzbekistan 15.6 8601 12 8155 -1.7 Modelled estimate

Vanuatu 14.1 86 13.9 96 -0.1 Modelled estimate

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 9.0 5236 7.1 4308 -1.5 Modelled estimate

Viet Nam 15.0 18062 10.1 16122 -2.6 Modelled estimate

Yemen 36.6 24548 29 24646 -1.5 Modelled estimate

Zambia 26.3 12105 20.9 13126 -1.5 Modelled estimate

Zimbabwe 19.9 7993 20.6 11493 0.2 Modelled estimate

Footnote: rates only are reported for countries with <50 stillbirths in 2015

Page 107: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

105

Graph of regional trends in stillbirth rate 2000 – 2015

Graphs by country of data inputs and stillbirth rate estimates with associated

uncertainty

Graph legend for marker colour to indicate data type:

Dark Green = High quality national routine information system data

Light Green = Lower quality national routine information system data

Orange = Nationally representative retrospective household surveys

Blue = Sub-national population based

Maroon = Sub-national other

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

REG

ION

AL

STIL

LBIR

TH R

ATE

Developed region

Southern Asia

Caucasus and Central Asia

Eastern Asia

Latin America and theCaribbean

N.Africa and Middle East

South-eastern Asia

Page 108: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

106

Afghanistan:

Angola:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

10

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

2

Page 109: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

107

Albania:

Andorra:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

30

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

4

Page 110: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

108

United Arab Emirates:

Argentina:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

50

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

6

Page 111: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

109

Armenia:

Antigua and Barbuda:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

70

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

8

Page 112: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

110

Australia:

Austria:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

90

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

10

Page 113: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

111

Azerbaijan:

Burundi:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

110

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

12

Page 114: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

112

Belgium:

Benin:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

130

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

14

Page 115: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

113

Burkina Faso:

Bangladesh:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

150

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

16

Page 116: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

114

Bulgaria:

Bahrain:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

170

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

18

Page 117: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

115

Bahamas:

Bosnia and Herzegovina:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

190

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

20

Page 118: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

116

Belarus:

Belize:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

210

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

22

Page 119: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

117

Bolivia (Plurinational State of):

Brazil:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

230

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

24

Page 120: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

118

Barbados:

Brunei Darussalam:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

250

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

26

Page 121: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

119

Bhutan:

Botswana:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

270

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

28

Page 122: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

120

Central African Republic:

Canada:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

290

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

30

Page 123: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

121

Switzerland:

Chile:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

310

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

32

Page 124: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

122

China:

Côte d'Ivoire:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

330

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

34

Page 125: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

123

Cameroon:

Democratic Republic of the Congo:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

350

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

36

Page 126: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

124

Congo:

Cook Islands:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

370

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

38

Page 127: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

125

Colombia:

Comoros:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

390

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

40

Page 128: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

126

Cabo Verde:

Costa Rica:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

410

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

42

Page 129: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

127

Cuba:

Cyprus:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

430

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

44

Page 130: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

128

Czech Republic:

Germany:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

450

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

46

Page 131: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

129

Djibouti:

Dominica:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

470

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

48

Page 132: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

130

Denmark:

Dominican Republic:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

490

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

50

Page 133: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

131

Algeria:

Ecuador:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

510

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

52

Page 134: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

132

Egypt:

Eritrea:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

530

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

54

Page 135: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

133

Spain:

Estonia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

550

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

56

Page 136: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

134

Ethiopia:

Finland:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

570

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

58

Page 137: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

135

Fiji:

France:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

590

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

60

Page 138: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

136

Micronesia (Federated States of):

Gabon:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

610

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

62

Page 139: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

137

United Kingdom:

Georgia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

630

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

64

Page 140: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

138

Ghana:

Guinea:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

650

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

66

Page 141: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

139

Gambia:

Guinea-Bissau:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

670

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

68

Page 142: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

140

Equatorial Guinea:

Greece:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

690

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

70

Page 143: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

141

Grenada:

Guatemala:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

710

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

72

Page 144: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

142

Guyana:

Honduras:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

730

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

74

Page 145: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

143

Croatia

Haiti:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

750

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

76

Page 146: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

144

Hungary:

Indonesia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

770

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

78

Page 147: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

145

India:

Ireland:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

790

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

80

Page 148: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

146

Iran (Islamic Republic of):

Iraq:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

810

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

82

Page 149: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

147

Iceland:

Israel:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

830

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

84

Page 150: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

148

Italy:

Jamaica:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

850

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

86

Page 151: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

149

Jordan:

Japan:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

870

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

88

Page 152: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

150

Kazakhstan:

Kenya:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

890

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

90

Page 153: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

151

Kyrgyzstan:

Cambodia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

910

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

92

Page 154: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

152

Kiribati:

Saint Kitts and Nevis:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

930

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

94

Page 155: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

153

Republic of Korea:

Kuwait:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

950

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

96

Page 156: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

154

Lao People’s Democratic Republic:

Lebanon:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

970

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

98

Page 157: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

155

Liberia:

Libya:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

990

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

100

Page 158: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

156

Saint Lucia:

Sri Lanka:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1010

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

102

Page 159: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

157

Lesotho:

Lithuania:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1030

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

104

Page 160: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

158

Luxembourg:

Latvia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1050

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

106

Page 161: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

159

Morocco:

Monaco:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1070

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

108

Page 162: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

160

Republic of Moldova:

Madagascar:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1090

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

110

Page 163: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

161

Maldives:

Mexico:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1110

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

112

Page 164: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

162

Marshall Islands:

The former Yugoslav Republic of:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1130

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

114

Page 165: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

163

Mali:

Malta:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1150

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

116

Page 166: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

164

Myanmar:

Montenegro:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1170

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

118

Page 167: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

165

Mongolia:

Mozambique:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1190

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

120

Page 168: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

166

Mauritania:

Mauritius:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1210

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

122

Page 169: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

167

Malawi:

Malaysia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1230

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

124

Page 170: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

168

Namibia:

Niger:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1250

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

126

Page 171: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

169

Nigeria:

Nicaragua:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1270

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

128

Page 172: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

170

Niue:

Netherlands:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1290

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

130

Page 173: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

171

Norway:

Nepal:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1310

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

132

Page 174: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

172

Nauru:

New Zealand:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1330

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

134

Page 175: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

173

Oman:

Pakistan:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1350

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

136

Page 176: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

174

Panama:

Peru:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1370

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

138

Page 177: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

175

Philippines:

Palau:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1390

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

140

Page 178: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

176

Papua New Guinea:

Poland:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1410

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

142

Page 179: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

177

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea:

Portugal:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1430

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

144

Page 180: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

178

Paraguay:

Occupied Palestinian Territory:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1450

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

146

Page 181: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

179

Qatar:

Romania:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1470

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

148

Page 182: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

180

Russian Federation:

Rwanda:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1490

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

150

Page 183: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

181

Saudi Arabia:

Sudan:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1510

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

152

Page 184: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

182

Senegal:

Singapore:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1530

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

154

Page 185: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

183

Solomon Islands:

Sierra Leone:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1550

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

156

Page 186: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

184

El Salvador:

San Marino:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1570

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

158

Page 187: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

185

Somalia:

Serbia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1590

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

160

Page 188: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

186

South Sudan:

Sao Tome and Principe:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1610

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

162

Page 189: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

187

Suriname:

Slovakia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1630

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

164

Page 190: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

188

Slovenia:

Sweden:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1650

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

166

Page 191: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

189

Swaziland:

Seychelles:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1670

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

168

Page 192: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

190

Syrian Arab Republic:

Chad:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1690

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

170

Page 193: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

191

Togo:

Thailand:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1710

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

172

Page 194: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

192

Tajikistan:

Turkmenistan:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1730

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

174

Page 195: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

193

Timor-Leste:

Tonga:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1750

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

176

Page 196: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

194

Trinidad and Tobago:

Tunisia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1770

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

178

Page 197: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

195

Turkey:

Tuvalu:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1790

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

180

Page 198: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

196

United Republic of Tanzania:

Uganda:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1810

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

182

Page 199: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

197

Ukraine:

Uruguay:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1830

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

184

Page 200: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

198

United States:

Uzbekistan:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1850

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

186

Page 201: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

199

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines:

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of):

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1870

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

188

Page 202: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

200

Viet Nam:

Vanuatu:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1890

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

190

Page 203: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

201

Samoa:

Yemen:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1910

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

192

Page 204: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

202

South Africa:

Zambia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1930

51

01

52

02

53

03

54

04

55

05

56

0

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

194

Page 205: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

203

Zimbabwe:

Graphs of input data and estimated stillbirth rates by region Developed region:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Stillb

irth

rate

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1950

510

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Stillb

irth

ra

te

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

1

Page 206: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

204

South Asia:

Caucasus and Central Asia:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Stillb

irth

ra

te

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

20

510

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Stillb

irth

ra

te

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

3

Page 207: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

205

East Asia:

Latin America and the Caribbean

North Africa and Middle East:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Stillb

irth

ra

te

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

40

510

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Stillb

irth

ra

te

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

5

Page 208: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

206

South-East Asia and Oceania:

Sub-Saharan Africa:

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Stillb

irth

ra

te

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

60

510

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Stillb

irth

ra

te

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

7

Page 209: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

207

Comparison of neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate data and

estimates: 1990-1999 2000-2009 Since 2010

Neonatal Mortality Rate

Number of countries with annual national data for neonatal mortality rate (CRVS, SRS or surveillance data)

60 (48*) 74 (55*) 73 (57*)

Frequency of global and country estimates for neonatal mortality rate

Intermittent estimates up to a decade apart

Transition to alternative year estimates and then annual estimates

Annual by UN IGME and IHME

Stillbirth Rate

Number of countries with annual national data for stillbirth rate+

54 85 86

Frequency of global and country estimates for stillbirth rate

No global estimates published

No country-level

systematic estimates.

Two global and regional estimates published for year 2000

First WHO country

level estimates for 193

countries published

2011 (for year 2009).

Second WHO country level estimates (this study)

05

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Stillb

irth

ra

te

2000 2005 2010 2015Year

8

Page 210: LSHTM Research Onlineresearchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2534182/2/Blencowe et al 2016...Supplementary appendix This appendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed

208

*number of countries with data fulfilling inclusion criteria for neonatal mortality rate model are given in brackets +data routine data for more than 5 years in whole decade or more than 2 years since 2010 from any national routine

source including CRVS, birth registry and HMIS

References

1. Woods CR, Davis DW, Duncan SD, Myers JA, O'Shea TM. Variation in classification of live birth with newborn period death versus fetal death at the local level may impact reported infant mortality rate. BMC pediatrics 2014; 14: 108. 2. Msemo G, Massawe A, Mmbando D, et al. Newborn mortality and fresh stillbirth rates in Tanzania after helping babies breathe training. Pediatrics 2013; 131(2): e353-60. 3. Carlo WA, Goudar SS, Jehan I, et al. Newborn-care training and perinatal mortality in developing countries. The New England journal of medicine 2010; 362(7): 614-23. 4. The DHS Program. http://www.dhsprogram.com/. 5. Vogel JP, Souza JP, Mori R, et al. Maternal complications and perinatal mortality: findings of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG 2014; 121 Suppl 1: 76-88. 6. The World Health Organization. Global survey on maternal and perinatal health http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/maternal_perinatal/globalsurvey/en/. 7. Newman L, Kamb M, Hawkes S, et al. Global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy and associated adverse outcomes: analysis of multinational antenatal surveillance data. PLoS Med 2013; 10(2): e1001396. 8. UN Population Division. World Population Prospects: the 2015 Revision. http://esaunorg/wpp/indexhtm 2015.