lRVPsteamjeejctor

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 lRVPsteamjeejctor

    1/3

    The capacity of atmospheric liquid storage tanks should be

    at least 1.5 times the size of the transportation equipment,

    typically 4,000 to 7,500 gal for tank trucks and up to 34,500

    gal for tank cars. A shipment by barge may be as large as

    420,000 gal. The maximum size for a single cone-roof or

    floating-roof tank is approximately 20,000,000 gal, which

    corresponds to a diameter of about 300 ft and a height of

    about 50 ft. Storage of liquid feeds, products, and interme-

    diates may also be provided on-site in so-called surge tanksor day tanks, which provide residence times of 10 min to

    one day. Equations for estimating the f.o.b.purchase costs of

    open, cone-roof, and floating-roof tanks are included in

    Table 22.32.

    For liquid stored at pressures greater than 3 psig or under

    vacuum, spherical or horizontal (or vertical) cylindrical

    (bullet) pressure vessels are used. Vertical vessels are not

    normally used for volumes greater than 1,000 gal. Horizontal

    pressure vessels for storage are at least as large as 350,000

    gal. Spherical pressure vessels are also common, with more

    than 5,000 having been constructed worldwide. For liquid

    storage, spheres as large as 94 ft in diameter (3,000,000 gal)

    have been installed. The design and costing of cylindrical

    pressure vessels is considered in detail in Section 22.5.

    Purchase costs are plotted in Figure 22.13. For spherical

    pressure vessels, Eq. (22.60) for cylindrical pressure vessels

    is revised to:

    PdDi (22 72)

    In the rough region, the available vacuum systems in-

    clude: (1) one-, two-, and three-stage ejectors driven with

    steam and with or without interstage surface or barometric

    (direct-contact) condensers, (2) one- or two-stage liquid-ring

    pumpsusing oil or water as the sealant, and (3) dry vacuum

    pumpsincluding rotary lobe, claw, and screw compressors.

    Although the first two systems have been the most widely

    used dry vacuum pumps are gaining attention because they

    Table22.30 Lower Limits of Suction Pressure and Capacities

    of Vacuum Systemsa

    System Type

    Lower Limit

    of Suction

    Pressure (torr)

    Volumetric Flow

    Range at Suction

    Conditions (ft3/min)

    Steam-jet ejectors 101,000,000

    One-stage 100

    Two-stage 15

    Three-stage 2

    Liquid-ring pumps 318,000

    One-stage water sealed 50

    Two-stage water sealed 25

    Oil-sealed 10

    Dry vacuum pumps

    Three-stage rotary-lobe 1.5 60240

    Three-stage claw 0.3 60270

    Screw compressor 0.1 501,400

    aReprinted with permission from Ryans and Bays (2001).

    22.6 Purchase Costs of Other Chemical Processing Equipment 589

  • 8/12/2019 lRVPsteamjeejctor

    2/3

    PdDi (22 72) used dry vacuum pumps are gaining attention because they

    equipment operating under a vacuum, the air leakage leaving

    the equipment will be accompanied by volatile process

    components. To partially recover these components and

    reduce the load on the vacuum pump, the exiting gas should

    first pass through a precondenser before proceeding to the

    vacuum system. Theflow rates of process components still in

    the gas leaving the precondenser with the air can be deter-

    mined by a flash calculation as illustrated in the example

    below.Note, in Table 22.30, that steam-jet ejector systems can

    handle a very wide range of conditions. They have no moving

    parts and are inexpensiveto maintain, but arevery inefficient

    because of the high usage of motive steam. The maximum

    compression ratio per stage is approximately 7.5. The re-

    quired motive steam rate for each stage depends on the ratio

    of suction pressure-to-discharge pressure, steam pressure,

    temperature, gas properties, and ejector nozzle-to-throat

    ratio. A reasonably conservative range for the total motive

    steam requirement for all stages, when using 100-psig steamto evacuate mostly air, is 510 lb of steam per pound of gas

    being pumped. A detailed procedure for designing an ejector

    vacuum system is given by Sandler and Luckiewicz (1987).

    Liquid-ring pumps are limited to a suction pressure of

    10 torr with a moderate capacity and efficiency (2550%).

    Dry vacuum pumps can achieve very low pressures at higher

    efficiencies, but only for low capacities. Since vacuum

    pumps are actually gas compressors, a tendency exists for

    the gas temperature to increase in an amount corresponding

    EXAMPLE 22.18

    A vacuum distillation column produces an overhead vapor of

    1,365 kmol/hr of ethylbenzene and 63 kmol/hr of styrene at 30

    kPa. The volume of the column, vapor line, condenser, and reflux

    drum is 50,000 ft3. The overhead vapor is sent to a condenser

    where most of the vapor is condensed. The remaining vapor at

    508C and 25 kPa is sent to a vacuum system. Determine the air

    leakage rate in the distillation operation and the flow rate to the

    vacuum system. Select an appropriate vacuum system and deter-

    mine its f.o.b. purchase cost at a CE cost index of 550.

    SOLUTION

    The amount of air leakage, W, is estimated from Eq. (22.73).

    Using a pressure of 25 kPa 188 torr:

    W 5f0:02980:03088ln188

    0:0005733ln1882g50; 0000:66 227lb/hr

    This is equivalent to 103 kg/hr or 3.6 kmol/hr. Adding this to the

    overhead vapor and performing a flash calculation at 508C and

    25 kPa (188 torr) gives a vapor leaving the reflux drum and

    entering the vacuum system of 3.6 kmol/hr of air and 0.7 kmol/hr

    of ethylbenzene. The volumetric flow rate to the vacuum system

    is 272 ft3/min. The flow rate in pounds per hour is 394. From

    Table 22.30, applicablevacuum systems are a single-stage steam-

    jet ejector, a single-stage liquid-ring pump, and a screw compres-

    sor. The three-stage claw unit is just out of the range of the

    volumetric flow rate

    590 Chapter 22 Cost Accounting and Capital Cost Estimation

  • 8/12/2019 lRVPsteamjeejctor

    3/3

    Conveyors

    Belt Width, W, in. Length, L, ft 1460 in., up to 300 ft CP 21:5WL Does not include motor or drive

    Screw Diameter, D, in. Length, L, ft 620 in., up to 300 ft CP 70:5DL0:59 Does not include motor,

    drive, lid, or jacket

    Vibratory Width, W, in. Length, L, ft 1236 in., up to 100 ft CP 81:6W0:57L0:87 Does not include motor or drive

    Bucket elevators Bucket width, W, in. Height, L, f t 6 2 0 i n., 1 5 15 0 ft CP 610W0:5L0:57 Does not include motor or drive

    P ne um at ic c onve yo rs S ol id s fl ow r ate ,m, lb/s

    Equivalent length, L, feet

    330 lb/s, 30600 ft CP 15; 200M0:63L0:20 Includes blower, motor, piping,

    rotary valve, and cyclone

    Storage tanks

    Open Volume, V, gal 1,00030,000 gal CP 18V0:72 Fiberglass

    Cone roof Volume, V, gal 10,0001,000,000 gal CP 265V0:51 Carbon steel, pressure to 3 psig

    Floating roof Volume, V, gal 30,0001,000,000 gal CP 475V0:51 Carbon steel, pressure to 3 psig

    Spherical, 030 psig Volume, V, gal 10,0001,000,000 gal CP 60V0:72 Carbon steel

    Spherical, 30200 ps ig Volume ,V, gal 10,000750,000 gal CP 47V0:78 Carbon steel

    Gas holders Volume, V, ft3 4,000400,000 ft3 CP 3; 170V0:43 Carbon steel, pressure to 3 psig

    Vacuum systems

    O ne-stage j et eject or (lb /h r)/(su ct io n p ressure, t orr) 0 .1 1 00 l b/ hr-t orr CP 1; 690S0:41 See Table 22.31 for multistage units

    and condensers

    Liquid-ring pumps Flow at s uction, ft3/min 50350 ft 3/min CP 8; 250S0:35 Stainless steel with sealant

    recirculation

    Three-stage lobe Flow at suction, ft3/min 60240 ft 3/min CP 7; 120S0:41 Includes intercoolers

    Three-stage claw Flow at suction, ft3/min 60270 ft 3/min CP 8; 630S0:36 Includes intercoolers

    Sc rew com pre ssors Flow at s uction, ft3/min 50350 ft 3/min CP 9; 590S0:38 With protective controls

    Wastewater treatment

    Primary Wastewater rate, Q, ga l/ mi n 7 5 75, 00 0 g al /m in CBM 14; 800Q0:64 Bare-module cost

    P ri ma ry + S ec ond ar y Wa st ew at er r ate ,Q, ga l/ mi n 7 5 75, 00 0 g al /m in CBM 43; 000Q0:64 Bare-module cost

    Primary + Secondary + Tertiary Wastewater rate,Q, ga l/ mi n 7 5 75, 00 0 g al /m in CBM 88; 000Q0:64 Bare-module cost

    595