Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
serving districts in
Volume 4, Issue 6, February 2015 Page 1
What is a “language objective”? In Explicitly Designed Instruction for English Learners (2013, pp. 69-70), Hollingsworth and Ybarra describe language objectives as statements of how the teacher will intentionally advance the use of the English language during the lesson and further students’ language development through structured listening, speaking, reading, and writing activities. Echevarría, Vogt and Short in Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners (2012, pp. 33-34) recommend thinking about four major categories when creating language objectives: academic vocabulary; language skills and function; language structures or grammar; and language learning strategies. In other words, language
Every year teachers are confronted with new challenges as new students with unique needs enter their classrooms. Students who are English Language Learners, or ELLs, are a growing population that can present new challenges to even experienced teachers. As of 2012, 19% of ELLs were classified as students with disabilities, compared to just 14% of their non-ELL peers. The general consensus is that this overrepresentation is due to limited knowledge on how to effectively instruct these students. This article describes one of the first steps in effective instruction for ELLs and students with language difficulties: ensuring that, in addition to a content objective, every lesson has a meaningful language objective as well.
Supporting English Language Learners Through Language Objectives
By John Boniello, Bilingual Special Education Specialist
RSE-TASC REPORTER LOWER HUDSON REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT CENTER
Inside this issue:
Supporting ELLs Through Language Objectives
1
RSE-TASC Workshops 2
Community Events 3
School Tool 3
Bright Spot 4
Contact Information 4
(cont. on pg. 3)
objectives describe the vocabulary students will need to understand and use during the lesson; the language skills and functions students will need to engage in during the lesson; the language structures and grammar they will be expected to use; and the meta-cognitive strategies
School-Wide Systems
Instructional Interventions
Improving the Sentence: Research-Based Writing Strategies for
Struggling Students: 2/2 *Wait
List*
Effective Instruction for English Language Learners: Specially
Designed Academic Instruction (3
days):2/3, 2/10 & 2/24
Improving the Sentence: Research-Based Writing Strategies for
Struggling Students: 2/25
Explicit Instruction: Providing Access to Curriculum for
Struggling Students (3-Day): 3/2,
3/17 and 4/9
Specially Designed Instruction: 3/12
Explicit and Specially Designed Instruction Lesson Study Group (2
of 3): 3/23
Technology Supports for Students with Disabilities: 3/26
Research-Based Comprehension Strategies for Struggling Students:
4/20
Explicit and Specially Designed Instruction Lesson Study Group (3
of 3): 4/30
Effective Instruction for English Language Learners: Specially
Designed Academic Instruction (3
days): 5/6, 5/11 & 5/18
Behavior & Discipline
Supports
PBIS Coaches’ Forum for Specialized School Settings: 2/4
PBIS New Coaches’ Forum: 2/25
Tier 3 Interventions for Students with Disabilities who are English
Language Learners in PreK-5; 2/26
Data-Based Decision-Making for School-Wide PBIS: 3/3
Tier 3 Interventions for Students with Disabilities who are English
Language Learners in 6-12; 3/3
PBIS Advanced Coaches’ Forum: 3/10
PBIS Forum for Administrators: 3/24
Developing Behavior Improvement Plans for Preschoolers (2-Day): 4/8
& 4/22
PBIS Lesson Planning: 4/14
PBIS New Coaches Forum: 4/24
Alternatives to Suspension: 5/4
Transition Planning and
Post-Secondary Supports
CDOS Commencement Credential for Principals: 2/24
Career Development and Occupational Studies (CDOS)
Commencement Credential: 3/12
Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential
(SACC): 3/25
Transition Planning: 4/13
Graduation Options: 4/17
Assessment, Transition Planning and IEP Goals for High School
Students: 4/23
Individualized Educational
Planning & the CSE Process
Measurable Annual IEP Goals: 2/13 *Wait List*
Language Acquisition vs. Learning Disability, 2/23
Progress Monitoring in the IEP: 2/25 *Wait List*
Educational Benefit: IEP Self-Review Process: 3/10
Educational Benefit: IEP Self-Review Process: 3/24
Language Acquisition vs. Learning Disability: 4/13
To Register for our Regional Workshops
Please go to
www.pnwboces.org/catalog to
register online. Click on the
down arrow next to the box that
says “Click one or more
options…”, then select
RSE-TASC and click
“Search”. Scroll down the
webpage until you see the
workshop in which you are
interested and then click on its
name to see details and enroll..
Lower Hudson RSE-TASC Regional Trainings What Works for Students with Disabilities
Mark Your Calendar
RSE-TASC REPORTER LOWER HUDSON REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT CENTER
Volume 4, Issue 6, February 2015 Page 2
Leadership for Struggling
Learners
CSE Roundtable: 2/5 *Wait
List*
Rockland County Regional Early Childhood Administrators
Forum for Promoting Social-
Emotional Development; 3/4
Administrator Training: Teaching Writing Skills Across
the Curriculum: A Pathway to
School Improvement: 3/5
Putnam/Northern Westchester Regional Early Childhood
Administrators Forum for
Promoting Social-Emotional
Development; 3/13
Southern Westchester Regional Early Childhood Administrators
Forum for Promoting Social-
Emotional Development: 3/25
CPSE Colloquium: 3/26
CSE Roundtable: 4/29
Please register for workshops in which you
are interested even if they have a wait list.
Whenever possible, we will add additional
sessions for registrants on the wait list.
Understanding Your Child’s Individualized Education Program; 2/3/15, Putnam Independent Living Services, [email protected]
Learning Style Approaches in Teaching English Language Learners, Grades K-5; begins 2/6/15, PNW BOCES, www.pnwboces.org/catalog
Learning Style Approaches to Behavior Management for Special Needs Students, Grades 3-8; begins 2/6/15, PNW BOCES, www.pnwboces.org/catalog
Volume 4, Issue 6, February 2015 Page 3
RSE-TASC REPORTER LOWER HUDSON REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT CENTER
they will need to plan and monitor their learning.
Language objectives can be conceptualized around the four language functions: Listening: Listening objectives are
needed when students are purposely exposed to spoken language, including vocabulary words or sentence structures. The vocabulary may be a content word (e.g. mitochondria, photosynthesis, tectonic plate) or a general academic word (e.g. analyze, formulate, statement). An example of a sentence
structure would be if the teacher is reading a text with passive voice and the teacher plans to explicitly tell students to listen to how the sentence is phrased and what it means to use passive voice.
Speaking: Speaking objectives are needed when there is a structured speaking activity requiring students to use new vocabulary or academic content. Structured academic talk has been shown to play a major role in language development for students and should be included in lessons whenever possible (Francis, Lesaux, Kieffer & Rivera, 2006).
These objectives might include how students will use sentence frames or starters, rehearsal strategies, or language structures in conversation.
Reading: Reading objectives describe how the teacher will facilitate student reading of an academic text rather than how the teacher will teach reading. These might include objectives for having students read for a purpose or to identify new information and vocabulary words.
Writing: Writing objectives are
(cont. from pg. 1)
(cont. on pg. 4)
For more information on writing language objectives you can visit http://www.colorincolorado.org/article/49646/, which has a great description of language objectives and some examples.
John Hollingsworth’s Explicit Direct Instruction for English Learners was the source of most of the information in the main article. For more on explicit direct instruction visit http://dataworks-ed.com/ where you can find videos, the research backing for EDI, and many other materials you may find helpful.
School Tool: Writing Effective Language Objectives
Community Events for February
Strategies for Working with Students with Emotional Disabilities; begins 2/9/15, PNW BOCES, www.pnwboces.org/catalog
Schools That Really Care: Expanding RTI to Address Social & Emotional Needs; 2/10/15, PNW BOCES, www.pnwboces.org/catalog
Transition from CPSE to CSE: Going to Kindergarten; 2/11/15, Greenville Elementary School, Scarsdale, Contact: Paula Ceddia 914-472-7769
Flipped Classroom; begins 2/16/15, PNW BOCES, www.pnwboces.org/catalog
Dyslexia: What It Is and What to Do About It!; starts 2/16/15, Everyone Reading, https://pci.nycenet.edu/aspdp/PublicPages/login.aspx
The Close Read: A Vehicle for ALL STUDENTS to Read Complex Text; 2/26/15, SW BOCES, www.swboces.org/support.cfm
Volume 4, Issue 6, February 2015 Page 4
(cont. from pg. 3)
RSE-TASC REPORTER LOWER HUDSON REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT CENTER
needed when the teacher is explicitly teaching writing skills or strategies, such as the structure of paragraphs or sentences, essay writing, outlining, or editing. The purpose of the writing activity must be made explicit and intentional, and students need to be taught self-monitoring strategies to ensure that their writing achieves that purpose.
Language objectives are the first step to creating effective lessons for ELLs. They are needed for all language
Patti Slobogin, Coordinator Leslie Zedlovich, Jr. Administrative Assistant Pamela DiCioccio, Workshop Specialist Felecia Morris, Sr. Office Assistant Regional Trainers: John Boniello, Bilingual Special Education Specialist Kit Casey, Transition Specialist Sara Fienup, Behavior Specialist Jennifer Gensior, Regional Special Education Trainer Dale Langley, Behavior Specialist Erin Leskovic, Preschool Behavior Specialist
Laurie Levine, Regional Special Education Trainer Stephanie Wozniak, Transition Specialist Special Education School Improvement Specialists (SESIS): Randy Ascher, Yonkers City Schools Andrew J. Ecker, Putnam Northern Westchester Denise Jaffe, Southern Westchester Barbara Kestenbaum, Rockland John McCabe, Special Act and Approved Private Schools Ann Narcisse, Special Act and Approved Private Schools Martha Trujillo-Torp, Yonkers City Schools
RSE-TASC Staff—Contact us at 914-248-2289
learners at all grade levels and in all content areas. For English language learners, as well as for any student who struggles with listening, speaking, reading and writing, we are all language teachers and must plan accordingly. While this article just scratches the surface of this important topic, readers can use the references and the School Tools on page 3 to learn more. References Echevarria, J.J., Vogt, M. & Short, D.J., Eds.
(2012). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP® model (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Francis, D., Lesaux, N., Kieffer, M., & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: Book 1: Research-based recommendations for instruction and academic interventions
(pp. 27-28). Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center of
Instruction. Hollingsworth, J., & Ybarra, S. (2013). Explicit
Direct Instruction for English Learners.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012, January 1).
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN® FRAMEWORK. Retrieved January 5, 2015, from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf
Bright Spot Our February Bright Spot comes from Elizabeth Peralta from Scholastic Academy in Yonkers City Schools.
Elizabeth has been working with Special Education School Improvement Specialist, Martha Trujillo-Torp to
implement Explicit Instruction in her classroom. Here are the strategies Elizabeth has been implementing and
the improved student outcomes she has observed:
White board and dry erase marker for each student: “I love how I can immediately monitor all of my students’ responses and reteach the skill right away if needed. All students are actively engaged and they
love them!”
Non-volunteers with popsicle sticks: “First, I ask a question and then select a stick. Students are all engaged because they don’t know whose name will be chosen. In the past, I used to call on the same
students because those students were willing to participate. When I used to call on students who didn’t
want to participate, they thought I was picking on them. Now, it is simple and fair. I also notice students get
excited when their names are selected.”
Think-Pair-Share: “I have noticed that my students are formulating better responses since they have time to think. Students who are usually reluctant to speak out loud are now more comfortable sharing their
responses with a classmate. I love to see all of my students engaged and becoming better active listeners.”
Sit up, Listen, Ask/Answer, Nod/Notes and Track the Teacher (SLANT): “I am amazed at how effective this command can be. It is brief and I get my students’ attention immediately. Most of the time it works, but
there are times that some of my students are distracted so they do not respond to the command. When this
occurs, I then begin to praise the students who are exhibiting the behavior and the students who were not
responding begin to follow.”