Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cell Health Cell Health
Reporter Gene Expression Reporter Gene Expression
Cell Health
Reporter Gene Expression
6 30 54 78 102 126 150 174 198 222 246 270 294 3180.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Hours Post Plasmid LNP Treatment
Neurite Length (mm) / Cell Body Cluster
Representative ImagesPhase - Formulation No.4 @ 78h
GFP Fluorescence - Formulation No.4 @ 78h
Neurite Length (mm) / Cell Body Cluster
Neurite Length (mm) / Cell Body Cluster
Untreated
Formulation 1
Formulation 3Formulation 4
Formulation 2
Untreated
Formulation 1
Formulation 3Formulation 4
Formulation 2
Untreated
Formulation 1
Formulation 3Formulation 4
Formulation 2
Untreated
Formulation 1
Formulation 3Formulation 4
Formulation 2
Untreated
Formulation 1
Formulation 3Formulation 4
Formulation 2
Untreated
Formulation 1
Formulation 3Formulation 4
Formulation 2
6 30 54 78 102 126 150 174 198 222 246 270 294 3180
25
50
75
100
Hours Post Plasmid LNP Treatment
% of phase cell bodies that are GFP Positive
% of phase cell bodies that are GFP Positive
% of phase cell bodies that are GFP Positive
0
40
80
120
160
0
40
80
120
160
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0n.s.
n.s.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.5 3 4PEG-DMG (mol %)
Diameter, Z. Avg (nm) PDI
Encapsulation Efficiency (%)
Diameter, Z. Avg (nm) PDI
4 6 8N/P ratio
n.s.
n.s.
Lipid Composition CL:DSPC:Cholesterol:PEG-DMG50:10:48.5:1.5 mol%CL = cationic lipid as labeled on x-axis
Init. Lipid Conc. 50 mM
mRNA GFP (996 nt), 0.025 mg
N/P Ratio 4
Organic Solvent Ethanol
Aqueous Phase 0.695 mg/mL mRNA in 100mMSodium Acetate
Instrument Setting 3x
Downstream Processing 4x Dilution in nuclease-free PBS
Lipid Composition PNI-ILa:DSPC:Cholesterol:PEG-DMG 50:10:38.5:1.5 mol%
Init. Lipid Conc. 50 mM
N/P Ratio
mRNA Mass (mg) Conc. (mg/mL)
GFP (996nt)
Aqueous Phase mRNA in 100 mM Sodium Acetate
Organic Solvent Ethanol
Instrument Setting 3x
Downstream Processing 4x Dilution in nuclease-free PBS
1.5 3 4
Encapsulation Efficiency (%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
PEG-DMG (mol %)
n.s.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Encapsulation Efficiency (%)
Diameter, Z. Avg (nm) PDI
0
50
100
150
200
DOTAP DOTMAIonizable/cationic lipid
n.s.
0
20
40
60
80
100
PNI-ILa
DOTAP DOTMA PNI-ILaIonizable/cationic lipid
4 6 80.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
N/P ratio
4 6 8
0.025 0.0167 0.01250.695 0.464 0.347
6 18 30 42 54 66 78 90 102 114 126 138 150 1620.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Hours Post Plasmid LNP Treatment
6 18 30 42 54 66 78 90 102 114 126 138 150 1620
20
40
60
Hours Post Plasmid LNP Treatment
6 18 30 42 54 66 78 90 102 114 126 138 150 1620.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Hours Post Plasmid LNP Treatment
6 18 30 42 54 66 78 90 102 114 126 138 150 1620
20
40
60
Hours Post Plasmid LNP Treatment
Cell Type iPSC-Derived NPCs
N/P Ratio 6
Payload GFP Plasmid
Treatment Point Day 1 of differentiation protocol
Dose 0.6 µg DNA /mL media
Apo-E 1 µg/mL media
Biological Assay Live-cell imaging:Phase: Neurite LengthFluorescence: GFP Expr.
Capture Frequency 6 Hours
Total Observed Period
21 Days
Representative ImagesPhase - Formulation No.3 @ 96h
GFP Fluorescence - Formulation No.3 @ 96h
Cell Type iPSC-Derived NPCs
N/P Ratio 4
Payload GFP Plasmid
Treatment Point Day 14 of differentiation
Dose 0.6 µg DNA /mL media
Apo-E 1 µg/mL media
Biological Assay Live-cell imaging:Phase: Neurite LengthFluorescence: GFP Expr.
Capture Frequency 6 Hours
Total Observed Period 7 Days
1Precision NanoSystems Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), 3Department of Zoology, 4Stem Cell Program and Institute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis Health Systems, Sacramento, CA, USA, 5Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
• Nucleic acid therapies permit access to previously undruggable pathways to treat or potentially cure a wide range of diseases, and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are the most clinically advanced non-viral delivery systems
• Significant need exists for robust manufacturing of LNPs at all scales, particularly at very low volumes to enable efficient screening of lipid components and nucleic acid payloads at earlier stages of drug development
• Here, we demonstrate the use of a low volume microfluidic device that provides consistent, controlled formulation conditions for encapsulating just tens of micrograms of mRNA and plasmids into LNPs
• LNP materials were systematically screened for size, polydispersity index, and activity in clinically relevant induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neuroprogenitor cells (NPCs) and cortical neurons
25-250 µL 1 - 15 mL 10 - 1000 mL 24L in 4.5h
NanoAssemblr™ Systems Span all Scales
Gene Delivery by Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP)
Spark™ Benchtop Blaze™ 8x Scale-Up
Systems employed in this study
Microfludic Nanoparticle Production
The NanoAssemblr™ platform uses microfluidics to precisely control the manufacturing of nanoparticles from microlitre to litre scales.
The NanoAssemblr Spark Workflow
• Uptake of LNPs occurs via low density lipoprotein receptor mediated endocytosis. Ionizable cationic lipids mediate endosomal disruption and release of nucleic acid
• LNPs were tested for expression in clinically relevant iPSC-derived NPCs and cortical neurons
• Formulations were rapidly produced with minimum consumption of valuable mRNA and plasmid
• Formulation volumes were < 100µL and required only 12-25 µg of nucleic acid
• Formulations were produced in sterile hood and immediately characterized or applied directly to iPSC-derived cells in culture
!"#"
!#"#"#"
#"
!
!
!
#"
#"
Nucleic Acid-LNP
Uptake
Nucleic AcidReleased
pH Change
Cytoplasm
Cell Membrane
Highest PEG concentration reduces encapsulation efficiency
Ionizable cationic lipid produces LNPs with lower size and PDI
Encapsulation efficiency and size reach threshold at N/P ≥ 6
Size measured by DLS and Encapsulation Efficiency by Ribogreen assay. Values represent the mean of triplicate formulations. Error bars are the standard deviation. Means grouped by a horizontal line are not significantly different (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P>0.05).
Further Details
Size measured by DLS and Encapsulation Efficiency by Ribogreen assay. Values represent the mean of triplicate formulations. Error bars are the standard deviation and are not drawn when error is less than the size of the symbol. Means grouped by a horizontal line are not significantly different (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P>0.05).
Further Details
Size measured by DLS and Encapsulation Efficiency by Ribogreen assay. Values represent the mean of triplicate formulations. Error bars are the standard deviation and are not drawn when error is less than the size of the symbol. Means grouped by a horizontal line are not significantly different (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P>0.05).
Further Details
Lipid Composition PNI-ILa:DSPC:Cholesterol:PEG-DMG50:10:40-x:x | x = 1.5, 3, 5 mol%
Init. Lipid Conc. 50 mM
mRNA GFP (996 nt), 0.025 mg
N/P Ratio 4
Organic Solvent Ethanol
Aqueous Phase 0.695 mg/mL mRNA in 100mMSodium Acetate
Instrument Setting 3x
Downstream Processing 4x Dilution in nuclease-free PBS
Formulation Details
Formulation Details
Formulation Details
Formulations with similar properties perform differently in iPSC-derrived NPCs undergoing differentiation: Biological activity is a necessary screen
A
Systematic screening of plasmid LNP formulations in mature human iPSC-derived cortical neurons: N/P ratio had a profound impact
N/P 6: Impacts Cell Health and Has Low Reporter Expression
B N/P 4: No Impact on Cell Health and Has Strong Expression of Reporter Gene
Treatment Details
• Formulation composition affects neuronal development: formulations 1 and 2 exhibit large decrease in neurite length that is not recovered over time
• Reporter gene expression peaks ~78h after treatment and appreciable expression is still present 14d following treatment
• The same formulations that do not impact neurite length also display high GFP expression, with approximately 80% of cell bodies expressing GFP by 78 hours
Treatment Details
• The N/P ratio is important to formulation efficacy for plasmid delivery to human iPSC-derived cortical neurons.
• Different N/P ratios were tested to identify candidate formulations with optimal performance in this therapeutically relevant cell type.
B Formulations 3 & 4 Exhibit the Least Impact on Neurite Health and The Highest Reporter Gene Expression
1Formulation Number
2 3 4
1Formulation Number
2 3 4
0
50
100
Encapsulation Effiency N/P 6N/P 4
Diameter, Z. Avg (nm)N/P 6 N/P 6
PDI
N/P 4N/P 4
0
100
200
0.0
0.2
0.4
A Physical properties similar between formulations with different lipids and N/P ratios
Further Details
• A panel of formulations containing PNI-ILa with different helper lipids was created at two N/P ratios
• Formulations 2, 3, and 4 have similar properties
• Panel was created rapidly with the Spark at µg quantities with encapsulation efficiency > 80%
Size measured by DLS and Encapsulation Efficiency by Ribogreen assay. Values represent the mean of duplicate formulations. Error bars are the standard deviation and are not drawn where error is smaller than the symbol.
1. Pipette Reagents In
2. Cap 3. Insert
4. Push “Start” 5. Pipette Particles Out
6. Dilute
Ready!
Characterizeor
Apply Directlyto Cells<10s
a cb
Buffer +mRNA
mRNA-LNP
Ethanol +lipids
LaminarMixing in < 1 ms
1
2
3
Purpose and Objectives Screening microgram mRNA formulations
Methods
Case Study: Optimizing LNP formulations for plasmid expression in iPSCs
Conclusions
• Microliter formulations containing microgram quantities of mRNA were rapidly produced using the NanoAssemblr Spark microfluidic system to systematically screen compositions against properties and activity
• PEG-lipid content ≥ 4 mol% reduced encapsulation efficiency; PNI-ILa produced LNPs with more favourable size and PDI than other cationic lipids; N/P ratios > 6 did not appreciably affect properties
• A panel of 4 formulations formulated at N/P 6 and N/P 4 were rapidly developed for testing in iPSC-derived neurons
• On iPSC-derived NPCs, formulations 3 and 4 outperformed 1 and 2 in terms of cell tolerance and reporter gene expression
• On iPSC-derived cortical neurons, all formulations at N/P 4 were better tolerated than N/P 6, and formulations 3 and 4 at N/P = 4 were most effective in inducing reporter gene expression
• Despite similar phsyical properties, formulations had very different in vitro efficacy• The Spark is ideal for efficient screening of formulations with valuable payloads in
clinically relevant cell types
/company/precision-nanosystems-inc @PrecisionNanowww.precisionnanosystems.com [email protected]
Low Volume Production Of Nanoparticles That Are Effective Transfection Systems In iPSC-derived Cells, Immune Cells and Other Primary Cell CulturesAndrew Brown, Chelsea Cayabyab, Rebecca A. G. De Souza, Tara Fernandez, Grace Tharmarajah, Anitha Thomas, Samuel Clarke and Euan Ramsay Precision NanoSystems Inc, Vancouver, BC, Canada
This poster is interactve!Download the free “layar” app on your
smartphone or tablet and use it to scan this poster. Enriched features are indicated with this logo.
Detailed Materials & Methods: Scan with Layar app.
Time lapse video of iPSC-NPCs growing and expressing GFP over 21 day period: Scan with Layar app.
Time lapse video of iPSC-derived cortical neurons growing and expressing GFP over 6 day period: Scan with Layar app.