1
Lost but not forgotten : attrition in the Étude longitudinale du Lost but not forgotten : attrition in the Étude longitudinale du développement des enfants du Québec (ÉLDEQ), 1998-2004 développement des enfants du Québec (ÉLDEQ), 1998-2004 Julien BÉRARD-CHAGNON and Simona BIGNAMI-VAN ASSCHE Julien BÉRARD-CHAGNON and Simona BIGNAMI-VAN ASSCHE Département de démographie Département de démographie Project financed by the Fonds québécois de recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC) Project financed by the Fonds québécois de recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC) Background Background Longitudinal surveys are increasingly used in the social sciences to describe behaviour dynamics, to identify the influence Longitudinal surveys are increasingly used in the social sciences to describe behaviour dynamics, to identify the influence of past on current behaviours, and to make stronger causal inferences than it is possible with cross-sectional surveys. of past on current behaviours, and to make stronger causal inferences than it is possible with cross-sectional surveys. In demography, longitudinal data are particularly relevant for the study of family transitions and life course analysis. In demography, longitudinal data are particularly relevant for the study of family transitions and life course analysis. One of the main weaknesses of longitudinal surveys is that they are prone to attrition, that is, the loss of study subjects One of the main weaknesses of longitudinal surveys is that they are prone to attrition, that is, the loss of study subjects over time that is due to respondents leaving the study prematurely and permanently. over time that is due to respondents leaving the study prematurely and permanently. Why study survey attrition ? Why study survey attrition ? Reduces the sample size (thus Reduces the sample size (thus reducing the power of statistical reducing the power of statistical estimations). estimations). Makes the study of small sub- Makes the study of small sub- samples harder. samples harder. Affects sample representativeness. Affects sample representativeness. Might lead to selection bias. Might lead to selection bias. Data Data ÉLDEQ: Ongoing longitudinal survey aimed ÉLDEQ: Ongoing longitudinal survey aimed at studying the factors influencing child at studying the factors influencing child development in Québec for a cohort of 2120 development in Québec for a cohort of 2120 children born in 1997-98. children born in 1997-98. The ÉLDEQ survey team has made lots of The ÉLDEQ survey team has made lots of efforts to minimize attrition and track down efforts to minimize attrition and track down attritors. attritors. Selected sample for the analysis: waves 1- Selected sample for the analysis: waves 1- 8. 8. Attrition in the ÉLDEQ Attrition in the ÉLDEQ Cumulative attrition rate (%), w ƒLDEQ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Attrition is measured by the Attrition is measured by the participation to the main survey participation to the main survey instrument (QIRI). instrument (QIRI). Attrition was very low in the Attrition was very low in the first phase of the survey (waves first phase of the survey (waves 1-5, before the sampled children 1-5, before the sampled children entered primary school), but entered primary school), but high in the second phase (waves high in the second phase (waves 6-8). 6-8). Many factors (uncertainty Many factors (uncertainty about the future of the survey, about the future of the survey, increasing length of interviews, increasing length of interviews, etc.) explain this finding. etc.) explain this finding. Attritors’ characteristics Attritors’ characteristics Attritors have different characteristics than the other respondents Attritors have different characteristics than the other respondents in the sample. in the sample. Overall, attritors distinguish themselves from non-attritors by Overall, attritors distinguish themselves from non-attritors by their characteristics associated with instability, poverty, their characteristics associated with instability, poverty, immigration and social exclusion. immigration and social exclusion. Type of family arrangement at the time of the surv attrition groups ( p<0,05) 71,4% 82,8% 82,8% 12,7% 7,4% 10,7% 15,9% 9,8% 6,5% A B C Intact family Step-parents family Single-parent famil Mother's first spoken language for thre groups ( p<0,01) 50,8% 81,0% 84,9% 7,9% 7,4% 7,4% 41,3% 11,6% 7,7% A B C French English Other A : Wave 1 attritors B : Wave 5 attritors C : Non-attritors Mother's highest diploma for three attrition gro 32,3% 16,5% 15,1% 25,8% 27,3% 25,4% 21,0% 35,5% 29,6% 21,0% 20,7% 29,9% A B C No Highschool Highschool PS (except univ.) University Study objectives Study objectives 1. 1. Compare the Compare the characteristics of attritors characteristics of attritors and non-attritors using chi-square tests and non-attritors using chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA. and one-way ANOVA. 2. 2. Identify the Identify the factors influencing the factors influencing the probability of attrition probability of attrition using using multivariate probit regressions. multivariate probit regressions. 3. 3. Measure Measure attrition bias attrition bias using BGLW tests using BGLW tests for selected variables. for selected variables. Conclusions Conclusions Probability of attrition by mother's high wave 1 0,238 0,306 0,323 0,398 University PS (except univ.) Highschool No highschoo Probability of attrition Probability of attrition The probability of attrition is modeled using a The probability of attrition is modeled using a probit model with a set of background and other probit model with a set of background and other individual characteristics as independent variables. individual characteristics as independent variables. Most variables do not predict significatively the Most variables do not predict significatively the probability of attrition. probability of attrition. Attrition bias Attrition bias Attrition bias is evaluated by means of BGLW tests (Becketti, Attrition bias is evaluated by means of BGLW tests (Becketti, Gould, Lillard and Welch, 1988) by regressing a selected variable of Gould, Lillard and Welch, 1988) by regressing a selected variable of interest on a set of control variables plus a dichotomous variable interest on a set of control variables plus a dichotomous variable representing attrition in the following waves. The presence and representing attrition in the following waves. The presence and magnitude of attrition bias is inferred from the significance of the magnitude of attrition bias is inferred from the significance of the estimated coefficient for attrition in this equation. estimated coefficient for attrition in this equation. Attrition does not exert a signficant bias on most variables of Attrition does not exert a signficant bias on most variables of interest (e.g. delay in child’ growth) with the exception of interest (e.g. delay in child’ growth) with the exception of mothers’ mothers’ immigrant status immigrant status and and abortion abortion . . *** *** ** ** * Probability of attrition by immigration s mother, wave 1 0,214 0,343 Non-immigrant Immigrant *** *** Probability of attrition by whether the overprotective of her child (on a contin between 0 and 10), wave 1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Legend: * Legend: * p p <0,10; ** <0,10; ** p p <0,05; *** <0,05; *** p p <0,01. <0,01. Notes: The household’s characteristics included in the models are: household income, Notes: The household’s characteristics included in the models are: household income, household income squared, number of siblings, whether home is owned). The individual household income squared, number of siblings, whether home is owned). The individual characteristics of the mother included in the models are: age, highest diploma, occupation. characteristics of the mother included in the models are: age, highest diploma, occupation. All probabilities are calculated using the mean score for continuous variables and the mode All probabilities are calculated using the mean score for continuous variables and the mode for discrete variables. for discrete variables. Probability of attrition by whether the mo abortion, wave 1 0,257 0,209 Mother had an abortion Mother didn't have an abor ** ** Probability that the mother had an ab attrition status (attrition bias), 0,322 0,385 Attritors Non-attrito ** ** Legend: * Legend: * p p <0,10; ** <0,10; ** p p <0,05; *** <0,05; *** p p <0,01. <0,01. Note: The background characteristics considered for the BGLW tests are the same used for the probit models. Note: The background characteristics considered for the BGLW tests are the same used for the probit models. Mother's overprotection mean score by status (attrition bias), wave 1 4,58 4,38 Attritors Non-attrito Respondents’ attitude towards surveys (i.e. level of Respondents’ attitude towards surveys (i.e. level of education) and geographic mobility are the two most important education) and geographic mobility are the two most important factors associated with attrition. factors associated with attrition. Although attrition exerts important biases for univariate Although attrition exerts important biases for univariate analyses, it does not generally bias multivariate analyses. analyses, it does not generally bias multivariate analyses. The main effect of attrition for analyses of the ÉLDEQ data The main effect of attrition for analyses of the ÉLDEQ data is to decrease the sample size and thus reduce the power of is to decrease the sample size and thus reduce the power of statistical inferences. statistical inferences. Continuing efforts are made by the ÉLDEQ survey team to Continuing efforts are made by the ÉLDEQ survey team to track down respondents and thus limit attrition in future track down respondents and thus limit attrition in future waves. waves. Future research should focus on the consequences of Future research should focus on the consequences of attrition for longitudinal analyses of the ÉLDEQ data attrition for longitudinal analyses of the ÉLDEQ data (survival analysis and multi-level analysis). (survival analysis and multi-level analysis). Researchers using longitudinal survey data should always Researchers using longitudinal survey data should always check for attrition bias in their analyses. check for attrition bias in their analyses. Probability that the mother is immigrant status , wave 1 0,304 0,187 Attritors Non-attrito *** ***

Lost but not forgotten : attrition in the Étude longitudinale du développement des enfants du Québec (ÉLDEQ), 1998-2004 Julien BÉRARD-CHAGNON and Simona

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lost but not forgotten : attrition in the Étude longitudinale du développement des enfants du Québec (ÉLDEQ), 1998-2004 Julien BÉRARD-CHAGNON and Simona

Lost but not forgotten : attrition in the Étude longitudinale du développement des Lost but not forgotten : attrition in the Étude longitudinale du développement des enfants du Québec (ÉLDEQ), 1998-2004enfants du Québec (ÉLDEQ), 1998-2004

Julien BÉRARD-CHAGNON and Simona BIGNAMI-VAN ASSCHEJulien BÉRARD-CHAGNON and Simona BIGNAMI-VAN ASSCHE

Département de démographieDépartement de démographie

Project financed by the Fonds québécois de recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC)Project financed by the Fonds québécois de recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC)

BackgroundBackground

Longitudinal surveys are increasingly used in the social sciences to describe behaviour dynamics, to identify the influence of past on current behaviours, and to make Longitudinal surveys are increasingly used in the social sciences to describe behaviour dynamics, to identify the influence of past on current behaviours, and to make stronger causal inferences than it is possible with cross-sectional surveys. stronger causal inferences than it is possible with cross-sectional surveys.

In demography, longitudinal data are particularly relevant for the study of family transitions and life course analysis.In demography, longitudinal data are particularly relevant for the study of family transitions and life course analysis.

One of the main weaknesses of longitudinal surveys is that they are prone to attrition, that is, the loss of study subjects over time that is due to respondents leaving the One of the main weaknesses of longitudinal surveys is that they are prone to attrition, that is, the loss of study subjects over time that is due to respondents leaving the study prematurely and permanently.study prematurely and permanently.

Why study survey attrition ?Why study survey attrition ?

Reduces the sample size (thus reducing the Reduces the sample size (thus reducing the power of statistical estimations).power of statistical estimations).

Makes the study of small sub-samples harder.Makes the study of small sub-samples harder.

Affects sample representativeness.Affects sample representativeness.

Might lead to selection bias.Might lead to selection bias.

DataData

ÉLDEQ: Ongoing longitudinal survey aimed at studying ÉLDEQ: Ongoing longitudinal survey aimed at studying the factors influencing child development in Québec for a the factors influencing child development in Québec for a cohort of 2120 children born in 1997-98.cohort of 2120 children born in 1997-98.

The ÉLDEQ survey team has made lots of efforts to The ÉLDEQ survey team has made lots of efforts to minimize attrition and track down attritors.minimize attrition and track down attritors.

Selected sample for the analysis: waves 1-8.Selected sample for the analysis: waves 1-8.

Attrition in the ÉLDEQAttrition in the ÉLDEQCumulative attrition rate (%), waves 1-8,

ƒLDEQ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Attrition is measured by the participation Attrition is measured by the participation to the main survey instrument (QIRI).to the main survey instrument (QIRI).

Attrition was very low in the first phase of Attrition was very low in the first phase of the survey (waves 1-5, before the sampled the survey (waves 1-5, before the sampled children entered primary school), but high children entered primary school), but high in the second phase (waves 6-8).in the second phase (waves 6-8).

Many factors (uncertainty about the Many factors (uncertainty about the future of the survey, increasing length of future of the survey, increasing length of interviews, etc.) explain this finding.interviews, etc.) explain this finding.

Attritors’ characteristicsAttritors’ characteristics

Attritors have different characteristics than the other respondents in the sample.Attritors have different characteristics than the other respondents in the sample.

Overall, attritors distinguish themselves from non-attritors by their characteristics associated Overall, attritors distinguish themselves from non-attritors by their characteristics associated with instability, poverty, immigration and social exclusion.with instability, poverty, immigration and social exclusion.

Type of family arrangement at the time of the survey for three attrition groups (p<0,05)

71,4%

82,8% 82,8%

12,7%

7,4%10,7%

15,9%

9,8%6,5%

A B C

Intact family Step-parents family Single-parent family

Mother's first spoken language for three attrition groups (p<0,01)

50,8%

81,0%84,9%

7,9%

7,4%

7,4%

41,3%

11,6%7,7%

A B C

French English Other

A : Wave 1 attritors B : Wave 5 attritors C : Non-attritors

Mother's highest diploma for three attrition groups (p<0,01)

32,3%

16,5% 15,1%

25,8%

27,3%25,4%

21,0%

35,5%

29,6%

21,0% 20,7%

29,9%

A B C

No Highschool Highschool PS (except univ.) University

Study objectivesStudy objectives

1.1. Compare the Compare the characteristics of attritorscharacteristics of attritors and non- and non-attritors using chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA.attritors using chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA.

2.2. Identify the Identify the factors influencing the probability of attritionfactors influencing the probability of attrition using multivariate probit regressions.using multivariate probit regressions.

3.3. Measure Measure attrition biasattrition bias using BGLW tests for selected using BGLW tests for selected variables.variables.

ConclusionsConclusions

Probability of attrition by mother's highest diploma, wave 1

0,238

0,3060,323

0,398

University PS (except univ.) Highschool No highschool

Probability of attritionProbability of attrition

The probability of attrition is modeled using a probit model with a set of The probability of attrition is modeled using a probit model with a set of background and other individual characteristics as independent variables.background and other individual characteristics as independent variables.

Most variables do not predict significatively the probability of attrition.Most variables do not predict significatively the probability of attrition.

Attrition biasAttrition bias

Attrition bias is evaluated by means of BGLW tests (Becketti, Gould, Lillard and Welch, Attrition bias is evaluated by means of BGLW tests (Becketti, Gould, Lillard and Welch, 1988) by regressing a selected variable of interest on a set of control variables plus a 1988) by regressing a selected variable of interest on a set of control variables plus a dichotomous variable representing attrition in the following waves. The presence and dichotomous variable representing attrition in the following waves. The presence and magnitude of attrition bias is inferred from the significance of the estimated coefficient for magnitude of attrition bias is inferred from the significance of the estimated coefficient for attrition in this equation.attrition in this equation.

Attrition does not exert a signficant bias on most variables of interest (e.g. delay in child’ Attrition does not exert a signficant bias on most variables of interest (e.g. delay in child’ growth) with the exception of growth) with the exception of mothers’ immigrant statusmothers’ immigrant status and and abortionabortion..

******

******

Probability of attrition by immigration status of the mother, wave 1

0,214

0,343

Non-immigrant Immigrant

******

Probability of attrition by whether the mother is overprotective of her child (on a continuous scale

between 0 and 10), wave 1

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Legend: * Legend: * pp<0,10; ** <0,10; ** pp<0,05; *** <0,05; *** pp<0,01. <0,01.

Notes: The household’s characteristics included in the models are: household income, household income squared, number of Notes: The household’s characteristics included in the models are: household income, household income squared, number of siblings, whether home is owned). The individual characteristics of the mother included in the models are: age, highest siblings, whether home is owned). The individual characteristics of the mother included in the models are: age, highest diploma, occupation. All probabilities are calculated using the mean score for continuous variables and the mode for discrete diploma, occupation. All probabilities are calculated using the mean score for continuous variables and the mode for discrete variables.variables.

Probability of attrition by whether the mother had an abortion, wave 1

0,257

0,209

Mother had an abortion Mother didn't have an abortion

****

Probability that the mother had an abortion by attrition status (attrition bias), wave 1

0,322

0,385

Attritors Non-attritors

****

Legend: * Legend: * pp<0,10; ** <0,10; ** pp<0,05; *** <0,05; *** pp<0,01. <0,01.

Note: The background characteristics considered for the BGLW tests are the same used for the probit models.Note: The background characteristics considered for the BGLW tests are the same used for the probit models.

Mother's overprotection mean score by attrition status (attrition bias), wave 1

4,58

4,38

Attritors Non-attritors

Respondents’ attitude towards surveys (i.e. level of education) and geographic Respondents’ attitude towards surveys (i.e. level of education) and geographic mobility are the two most important factors associated with attrition. mobility are the two most important factors associated with attrition.

Although attrition exerts important biases for univariate analyses, it does not Although attrition exerts important biases for univariate analyses, it does not generally bias multivariate analyses.generally bias multivariate analyses.

The main effect of attrition for analyses of the ÉLDEQ data is to decrease the The main effect of attrition for analyses of the ÉLDEQ data is to decrease the sample size and thus reduce the power of statistical inferences.sample size and thus reduce the power of statistical inferences.

Continuing efforts are made by the ÉLDEQ survey team to track down Continuing efforts are made by the ÉLDEQ survey team to track down respondents and thus limit attrition in future waves. respondents and thus limit attrition in future waves.

Future research should focus on the consequences of attrition for longitudinal Future research should focus on the consequences of attrition for longitudinal analyses of the ÉLDEQ data (survival analysis and multi-level analysis).analyses of the ÉLDEQ data (survival analysis and multi-level analysis).

Researchers using longitudinal survey data should always check for attrition bias Researchers using longitudinal survey data should always check for attrition bias in their analyses.in their analyses.

Probability that the mother is immigrant by attrition status , wave 1

0,304

0,187

Attritors Non-attritors

******