Upload
blimundo
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Loss Aggregate 2extended
Citation preview
*Sliding Scale Commission ExampleProvisional Commission: 30%If the loss ratio is less than 65%, then the commission increases by 1 point for each point decrease in loss ratio up to a maximum commission of 35% at a 60% loss ratioIf the loss ratio is greater than 65%, the commission decreases by 0.5 for each 1 point increase in LR down to a minimum comm. of 25% at a 75% loss ratioIf the expected loss ratio is 65% is the expected commission 30%?
*Sliding Scale Commission - Solution
PC Example 1
Profit Commission Example
Profit Commission:50%After10%Reins Margin
Ceding Commission:30%
Cost of PCCR
Loss Ratio Bandat avg LRat avg LR
LowHighAvg in BandProbabilityin Bandin Band
20%30%25%2.8%17.5%72.5%
30%40%35%9.4%12.5%77.5%
40%50%45%15.2%7.5%82.5%
50%60%55%20.9%2.5%87.5%
60%70%65%17.4%0.0%95.0%
70%80%75%15.1%0.0%105.0%
80%90%85%10.1%0.0%115.0%
90%100%95%5.8%0.0%125.0%
100%150%125%1.4%0.0%155.0%
150%200%175%1.1%0.0%205.0%
200%300%250%0.5%0.0%280.0%
300%400%350%0.3%0.0%380.0%
Average:65.0%100.0%3.3%98.3%
Cost of Profit Comm & CR at expected LR doesn't equal expected Cost of Profit Comm and expected CR
LR Dist
Estimating a Lognormal Distribution of Loss Ratios
On LevelModeled
YearLRCDFLR
199365.5%10.0%48.8%
199470.0%20.0%52.6%
199555.0%30.0%55.5%30.0%40.0%37.9%
199648.0%40.0%58.1%
199772.0%50.0%60.6%
199865.0%60.0%63.3%
199955.0%70.0%66.2%
Mean LR:61.5%80.0%69.9%
standard deviation:8.92%90.0%75.3%
Calculated CV:0.1595.0%80.0%
Selected CV:0.1798.0%85.8%
Lognormal Mu:(0.500)99.0%89.8%
Lognormal Sigma:0.169
Convoluting Cat & Noncat LR's
Convolution of Cat and Noncat LR's
Disretized Cat LR's
Non cat0%30%60%100%
LRProb60%20%15%5%
40%10%6.0%2.0%1.5%0.5%
55%25%15.0%5.0%3.8%1.3%
65%35%21.0%7.0%5.3%1.8%
77%25%15.0%5.0%3.8%1.3%
100%5%3.0%1.0%0.8%0.3%
Total Loss Ratios
These probabilities40%70%100%140%
correspond to55%85%115%155%
these total LR's65%95%125%165%
77%107%137%177%
100%130%160%200%
Parameter Uncertainty
Parameter Uncertainty
1) Simulate Expected Loss Ratio
Simulated random variable from 0 to 0.33: Choose 60%
Simulated random variable from 0.33 to 0.67: Choose 65%
Simulated random variable from 0.67 to 1,00: Choose 70%
Simulated Random Variable:0.8
Simulated Expected Loss Ratio:70.0%
2) Calculate New Lognormal Parameters
Sigma (same as original selection):0.17
Simulated Lognormal Mu:(0.37)
Mu = LN(Expected LR) - Sigma^2/2
3) Simulate Loss Ratio for Year Based on New Lognormal Mu
Simulated Random Variable (CDFi):0.842
# of St. Deviations Away from Mean [Normsinv(CDFi)]:1.00
Simulated Loss Ratio:81.7%
Exp (mu + Normsinv(CDFi) x sigma)
Count Sim Data
Claim Count Simulation Data
(Note)2001
SPI atReportedCountEst UltAnnualFreqTrendedExposureLevel
2001 RateClaimDevelClaimFreqTrend toClaimAdjClaim
YearLevelCountFactorCountTrend2001CountFactorCount
199110,0002.01.02.00.0%1.1042.211.603.53
199210,5001.01.01.00.0%1.1041.101.521.68
199311,0251.01.01.00.0%1.1041.101.451.60
199411,5761.01.11.10.0%1.1041.161.381.60
199512,1553.01.13.30.0%1.1043.641.324.80
199612,7630.01.20.00.0%1.1040.01.250.0
199713,4010.01.30.02.0%1.0820.01.190.0
199814,0710.01.50.02.0%1.0610.01.140.0
199914,7751.02.02.02.0%1.0402.081.082.25
200015,5131.03.53.52.0%1.0203.571.033.68
200116,0002.0%
Average:1.92
Variance:2.82
Note: Exposure Adj Factor Yr i = 2001 SPI / SPI year iSelected Variance:3.11
Count Sim
Claim Count Simulation
(A)Selected Mean Claim Count/Poisson Gamma1.92
(B)Selected Variance of Claim Count Distribution3.11
(C)Contagion Parameter [(Variance / Mean -1) / Mean]0.32
(D)Gamma Distribution Alpha (1/C)3.08
(E)Gamma Distribution Beta (C)0.32
(F)Simulated Gamma CDF0.412
(G)Simulated Gamma Random Variable0.78
(H)Simulated Poisson Gamma (A) X (G)1.50
Simulated Poisson Parameter1.50
Simulated Poisson CDF:0.808
Year 1 Simulated Claim Count:2
ProbProb
ClaimPoissonCountClaimPoissonCount
CountProbability
*Loss Ratio CorridorsA loss ratio corridor is a provision that forces the ceding company to retain losses that would be otherwise ceded to the reinsurance treatyLoss ratio corridor of 100% of the losses between a 75% and 85% LRIf gross LR equals 75%, then ceded LR is 75%If gross LR equals 80%, then ceded LR is 75%If gross LR equals 85%, then ceded LR is 75%If gross LR equals 100%, then ceded LR is ???
*Loss Ratio CapThis is the maximum loss ratio that could be ceded to the treaty.Example: 200% Loss Ratio CapIf LR before cap is 150%, then ceded LR is 150%If LR before cap is 250%, then ceded LR is 200%
*Loss Ratio Corridor ExampleReinsurance treaty has a loss ratio corridor of 50% of the losses between a loss ratio of 70% and 80%.Use the aggregate distribution to your right to estimate the expected ceded LR net of the corridor
PC Example 1
Profit Commission Example
Profit Commission:50%After10%Reins Margin
Ceding Commission:30%
Cost of PCCR
Loss Ratio Bandat avg LRat avg LR
LowHighAvg in BandProbabilityin Bandin Band
20%30%25%4.6%17.5%72.5%
30%40%35%8.1%12.5%77.5%
40%50%45%15.1%7.5%82.5%
50%60%55%20.9%2.5%87.5%
60%70%65%17.4%0.0%95.0%
70%80%75%14.4%0.0%105.0%
80%90%85%10.8%0.0%115.0%
90%100%95%5.4%0.0%125.0%
100%150%122%1.4%0.0%152.0%
150%200%270%1.1%0.0%300.0%
200%300%244%0.5%0.0%274.0%
300%400%235%0.3%0.0%265.0%
Average:65.26%100.0%3.48%98.7%
Cost of Profit Comm & CR at expected LR doesn't equal expected Cost of Profit Comm and expected CR
LR Dist
Estimating a Lognormal Distribution of Loss Ratios
On LevelModeled
YearLRCDFLR
199365.5%10.0%48.1%
199470.0%20.0%52.1%
199555.0%30.0%55.1%
199648.0%40.0%57.9%
199772.0%50.0%60.5%
199865.0%60.0%63.3%
199955.0%70.0%66.5%
Mean LR:61.5%80.0%70.3%
Calculated CV:0.1590.0%76.1%
Selected CV:0.1895.0%81.2%
Lognormal Mu:(0.502)98.0%87.3%
Lognormal Sigma:0.17999.0%91.7%
Count Sim Data
Claim Count Simulation Data
(Note)2001
SPI atReportedCountEst UltAnnualFreqTrendedExposureLevel
2001 RateClaimDevelClaimFreqTrend toClaimAdjClaim
YearLevelCountFactorCountTrend2001CountFactorCount
199110,0002.01.02.00.0%1.1042.211.603.53
199210,5001.01.01.00.0%1.1041.101.521.68
199311,0251.01.01.00.0%1.1041.101.451.60
199411,5761.01.11.10.0%1.1041.161.381.60
199512,1553.01.13.30.0%1.1043.641.324.80
199612,7630.01.20.00.0%1.1040.01.250.0
199713,4010.01.30.02.0%1.0820.01.190.0
199814,0710.01.50.02.0%1.0610.01.140.0
199914,7751.02.02.02.0%1.0402.081.082.25
200015,5131.03.53.52.0%1.0203.571.033.68
200116,0002.0%
Average:1.92
Variance:2.82
Note: Exposure Adj Factor Yr i = 2001 SPI / SPI year iSelected Variance:3.11
Count Sim
Claim Count Simulation
(A)Selected Mean Claim Count/Poisson Gamma1.92
(B)Selected Variance of Claim Count Distribution3.11
(C)Contagion Parameter:0.32
(D)(Variance / Mean -1) / Mean
(E)Gamma Distribution Alpha3.08
(F)Gamma Distribution Beta0.32
(G)Simulated Gamma CDF0.412
(H)Simulated Gamma Random Variable0.78
(I)Simulated Poisson Gamma (A) X (I)1.50
Simulated Poisson Gamma1.50
Simulated Poisson CDF:0.808
Year 1 Simulated Claim Count:2
ProbProb
ClaimPoissonCountClaimPoissonCount
CountProbability
*Loss Ratio Corridor Example Solution
PC Example 1
Profit Commission Example
Profit Commission:50%After10%Reins Margin
Ceding Commission:30%
Cost of PCCR
Loss Ratio Bandat avg LRat avg LR
LowHighAvg in BandProbabilityin Bandin Band
20%30%25%4.6%17.5%72.5%
30%40%35%8.1%12.5%77.5%
40%50%45%15.1%7.5%82.5%
50%60%55%20.9%2.5%87.5%
60%70%65%17.4%0.0%95.0%
70%80%75%14.4%0.0%105.0%
80%90%85%10.8%0.0%115.0%
90%100%95%5.4%0.0%125.0%
100%150%122%1.4%0.0%152.0%
150%200%270%1.1%0.0%300.0%
200%300%244%0.5%0.0%274.0%
300%400%335%0.3%0.0%365.0%
Average:65.53%100.0%3.48%99.0%
Cost of Profit Comm & CR at expected LR doesn't equal expected Cost of Profit Comm and expected CR
LR Dist
Estimating a Lognormal Distribution of Loss Ratios
On LevelModeled
YearLRCDFLR
199365.5%10.0%48.8%
199470.0%20.0%52.6%
199555.0%30.0%55.5%30.0%40.0%37.9%
199648.0%40.0%58.1%
199772.0%50.0%60.6%
199865.0%60.0%63.3%
199955.0%70.0%66.2%
Mean LR:61.5%80.0%69.9%
standard deviation:8.92%90.0%75.3%
Calculated CV:0.1595.0%80.0%
Selected CV:0.1798.0%85.8%
Lognormal Mu:(0.500)99.0%89.8%
Lognormal Sigma:0.169
Convoluting Cat & Noncat LR's
Convolution of Cat and Noncat LR's
Disretized Cat LR's
Non cat0%30%60%100%
LRProb60%20%15%5%
40%10%6.0%2.0%1.5%0.5%
55%25%15.0%5.0%3.8%1.3%
65%35%21.0%7.0%5.3%1.8%
77%25%15.0%5.0%3.8%1.3%
100%5%3.0%1.0%0.8%0.3%
Total Loss Ratios
These probabilities40%70%100%140%
correspond to55%85%115%155%
these total LR's65%95%125%165%
77%107%137%177%
100%130%160%200%
Count Sim Data
Claim Count Simulation Data
(Note)2001
SPI atReportedCountEst UltAnnualFreqTrendedExposureLevel
2001 RateClaimDevelClaimFreqTrend toClaimAdjClaim
YearLevelCountFactorCountTrend2001CountFactorCount
199110,0002.01.02.00.0%1.1042.211.603.53
199210,5001.01.01.00.0%1.1041.101.521.68
199311,0251.01.01.00.0%1.1041.101.451.60
199411,5761.01.11.10.0%1.1041.161.381.60
199512,1553.01.13.30.0%1.1043.641.324.80
199612,7630.01.20.00.0%1.1040.01.250.0
199713,4010.01.30.02.0%1.0820.01.190.0
199814,0710.01.50.02.0%1.0610.01.140.0
199914,7751.02.02.02.0%1.0402.081.082.25
200015,5131.03.53.52.0%1.0203.571.033.68
200116,0002.0%
Average:1.92
Variance:2.82
Note: Exposure Adj Factor Yr i = 2001 SPI / SPI year iSelected Variance:3.11
Count Sim
Claim Count Simulation
(A)Selected Mean Claim Count/Poisson Gamma1.92
(B)Selected Variance of Claim Count Distribution3.11
(C)Contagion Parameter [(Variance / Mean -1) / Mean]0.32
(D)Gamma Distribution Alpha (1/C)3.08
(E)Gamma Distribution Beta (C)0.32
(F)Simulated Gamma CDF0.412
(G)Simulated Gamma Random Variable0.78
(H)Simulated Poisson Gamma (A) X (G)1.50
Simulated Poisson Parameter1.50
Simulated Poisson CDF:0.808
Year 1 Simulated Claim Count:2
ProbProb
ClaimPoissonCountClaimPoissonCount
CountProbability