LOS BanosAt the Crossroads of California

www.losbanos.org

AGENDA

JOINTCITY COUNCIL AND

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS520 J Street

Los Banos, California

SEPTEMBER 21, 2011

If you require special assistance to attend or participate in this meeting, please call theCity Clerk's Office @ (209) 827-7000 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

The City of Los Banos complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990.* * * * * * * ** * * * * * * *

Si requiere asistencia especial para atender 0 participar en esta junta por favor lIame a la oficinade la Secretaria de la ciudad al (209) 827-7000 a 10 menos de 48 horas previas de la junta.

La Cuidad de Los Banos cumple con la Acta de Americanos con Deshabilidad (ADA) de 1990.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council / Redevelopment Agencyregarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the meeting

and in the City Clerk's office located at City Hall, 520 J Street, Los Banos, Californiaduring normal business hours. In addition, such writings and documents may be posted

on the City's website at www.losbanos.org.* * * * * * * ** * * * * * * *

Cualquier escritura 0 10$ documentos proporcionaron a una mayoria del Ayuntamiento / Agencia deReurbanizaci6ncon respecto a cualquier articulo en este orden del dia sera hecho disponible para la

inspecci6n publica en la reuni6n y en la oficina de la Secretaria de la ciudad en City Hall, 520 J Street, Los Banos,California durante horas de oficina normales. Ademas, tales escrituras y los documentos

pueden ser anunciados en el website de la ciudad en www./osbanos.org.

1 CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM

2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3 ROLL CALL

Faria _, Silveira_, Sousa _, Stone _, Villalta _

4 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGENDA.

Los Banos City Council / Redevelopment Agency Agenda - September 21.2011 Page 10f3

5 PRESENTATION - PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING CONSTITUTION WEEK.

6 PUBLIC FORUM (Members of the public may address the City Council IRedevelopment Agency Members on any item of public interest that is within thejurisdiction of the City Council I Redevelopment Agency; includes agenda and non­agenda items. No action will be taken on non-agenda items. Speakers are limitedto a five (5) minute presentation. Detailed guidelines are posted on the CouncilChamber informational table)

7 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA. (Items on theConsent Agenda are considered to be routine and will be voted on in one motionunless removed from the Consent Agenda by a City Council I RedevelopmentAgency Member)

A. Check Register for #131077 - #131381 in the Amount of $986,668.71.

Recommendation. Approve the check register as submitted.

B. Minutes for the September 7, 2011 City Council I Redevelopment AgencyMeeting

Recommendation Approve the minutes as submitted.

C City Council Resolution No. 5354 - Approving the Expansion of the MercedCounty Regional Enterprise Zone Boundaries.

Recommendation Adopt the resolutIon as submitted.

8 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (RTIF) UPDATE

Recommendation: Receive staff report and direction from the City Council on how to proceed.

9 CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBER APPOINTMENT TO THEIMPLEMENTATION TEAM FOR THE 10-YEAR PLAN TO ENDHOMELESSNESS

RecommendatIon: Receive staff report and appoint a City Council Member to the ImplementationTeam.

10 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT UPDATE

Recommendation: Informational item only

11 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY UPDATE

12 ADVISEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICES (One Report)

13 CITY MANAGER I EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT

Los Banos City Council / Redevelopment Agency Agenda - September 21, 2011 Page 2 of3

14 CITY COUNCIL / REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBER REPORTS

A. Elizabeth Stone

B Tom Faria

C Scott Silveira

D Joe Sousa

E Mayor Mike Villalta

15 CLOSED SESSION - CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTINGLITIGATION, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (A) OF SECTION 54956 9 OF THEGOVERNMENT CODE NAME OF CASE LARRY ANDERSON, ET AL VS CITYOF LOS BANOS, COUNTY OF MERCED SUPERIOR COURT CASE NOCY002069

16 ADJOURNMENT

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoingagenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.

'£.c.~(}fA ~~Lucille L. Mallonee. City Clerk . Dated this 15th day of Seotember 2011

Los Banos City Council / Redevelopment Agency Agenda - September 21.2011 Page 30f3

CK #131077 - #131381 09/21/11Bank ReconciliationChecks By Date

0911212011 - 8:57 AM

User: jdemelo

Cleared and Not Cleared Checks

Check No Check Date Name Comment ModuleVoid Clear Date Amount

131100 09/02/2011 A & A Portables Inc AP 78.68131101 09/02/2011 Abbott & Kindermann, LLP AP 268.97131102 09/02/2011 ABS Direct, Inc. AP 3,282.64131103 09/02/2011 AECOM Water ( Boyle) AP 2,579.85131104 09/02/2011 Aflac-Customer Service AP 165.90131105 09/02/2011 Aflac-Customer Service AP 212.80131106 09/02/2011 Aflac-Customer Service AP 53.90131107 09/02/2011 Aflac-Customer Service AP 122.89131108 09/0212011 All American Plumbing AP 199.86131109 09/02/2011 Ameripride Valley Uniform Serv AP 408.12131110 09/02/2011 Aramark Uniform Ser Inc AP 1,032.42131111 09/02/2011 AT&T AP 356.69131112 09/02/2011 AT&T AP 379.92131113 09/02/2011 Bank ofAmerica AP 87,261.33131114 09/02/2011 Bank ofAmerica AP 3,053.71131115 09/02/2011 Bank ofAmerica AP 12,233.44131116 09/0212011 Baker Supplies & Repair AP 97.28131117 09/0212011 Bear Cat Mfg Inc AP 1,143.15131118 09/02/2011 Board ofEqualization AP Void 2,732.00131119 09/02/2011 Borelli Real Estate Service AP 90.00131120 09/02/2011 Bruce's Tire Inc AP 443.32

" 131121 09/02/2011 BSK AP 3,734.30131122 09/02/2011 Capture Technologies Inc AP 2,099.00131123 09/02/2011 Paul S. Cardoza AP 75.00131124 09/02/2011 Cases Plus, Inc. AP 5,726.24131125 09/02/2011 Chevron Usa Inc AP 79.74131126 09/02/2011 Comcast AP 122.42131127 09/02/2011 CSI Forensic Supply AP 112.55131128 09/02/2011 Dakota Pump Inc AP 986.57131129 09/0212011 Dept of Transportation AP 2,004.77131130 09/02/2011 Duncan Printing Co. Inc. AP 339.41131131 09/02/2011 Emergency Vehide Outfitters AP 202.28131132 09/02/2011 F S RodIne AP 1,144.88131133 09/02/2011 Fastenal Company AP 1,691.73131134 09/02/2011 Federal Express AP 15.24131135 09/0212011 Ferrellgas, Inc. AP 42.92131136 09/02/2011 Franchise Tax Board AP 65.00131137 09/02/2011 Golden State Flow AP 1,634.70131138 09/02/2011 Galls Inc AP 232.26131139 09/02/2011 Darrall Gargano AP 342.30131140 09/0212011 Thomas W. Giraldin AP 150.00131141 09/02/2011 The Glass Shop AP 53.96131142 09/02/2011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 5,635.25131143 09/02/2011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 54.38131144 09/02/2011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 48.55131145 09/02/2011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 54.38131146 09/02/2011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 56.09131147 09/02/2011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 44.62131148 09/0212011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 45.37131149 09/02/2011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 24.78

BR - Checks by Date (09/12/2011 - 8:57 AM) Page

Check No Check Date Name Comment ModuleVoid Clear Date Amount

131150 0910212011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 30.45131151 0910212011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 74.57131152 0910212011 Hartford l.ife Ins Co AP 51.82131153 0910212011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 55.38131154 09102/2011 Hartford Life Ins Co AP 42.60131155 09102/2011 Hi Tech Emergency Vehicle Serv AP 26.20131156 0910212011 Holt Bros AP 584.08131157 09102/2011 Hotsy Pacific AP 379.50131158 09102/2011 Interstate Truck Center, l.l.C AP 238.77131159 0910212011 ICMA-RC Headquarters AP 680.00131160 09102/2011 Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. AP 3,101.42131161 09102/2011 In Shape Health Clubs Inc AP 605.00131162 09102/2011 The Iron Rod AP 163.66131163 09102/2011 Key Seal Products, Inc. AP Void 343.12131164 09102/2011 Kimball Midwest AP 379.02131165 09102/2011 Lehigh Hanson HeidelbergCement AP 483.53131166 09102/2011 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore AP 2,421.00131167 0910212011 l.os Banos Express Oil & l.ube AP 77.62131168 09102/2011 l.os Banos Feed & Ranch Supplie AP 45.26131169 09/02/2011 l.os Banos Police Assn AP 2,226.00131170 0910212011 l.os Banos Vet Clinic AP 168.00131171 09102/2011 Marfab Inc AP 319.46131172 09102/2011 Matson Alarm Co Inc AP 180.00131173 0910212011 McNamara Sports Inc AP 661.09131174 09102/2011 Merced County Dept OfAgricult AP 246.50131175 09102/2011 Merced County Sheriff AP 114.06131176 09102/2011 Richard Martinez AP 500.00131177 0910212011 Napa Auto Parts AP 468.30131178 0910212011 National Junior Basketballl.ea AP 84.00131179 09102/2011 Nest Environmental Services In AP 142.50131180 09102/2011 Nextel AP 187.96131181 09102/2011 The Office City AP 19.37131182 09102/2011 OSE AP 257.09131183 09102/2011 P G & E Company AP 6,322.35131184 09102/2011 Nationwide Retiremt Solut AP 1,660.00131185 09102/2011 PERS l.ong Term Care AP 451.16131186 09102/2011 Pinnacle Medical Group AP 233.00131187 09102/2011 Play Power l.T Farmington, INC. AP 31.21131188 0910212011 Precision Inspection Co., Inc. AP 255.00131189 09102/2011 Professional Fire Fighter AP 350.00131190 0910212011 Purchase Power Inc AP 4,000.00131191 0910212011 Jeremy Rahn AP 117.50131192 0910212011 Jerry Richard AP 56.00131193 09102/2011 Ronny's Landscaping AP 25,774.00131194 0910212011 Ronny's l.andscaping AP 14,866.00131195 0910212011 Safe TLite AP 796.87131196 09102/2011 Santos Ford Lincoln Mercury, I AP 70.08131197 0910212011 Save Mart Supermarkets AP 26.57131198 09102/2011 Seasons & Reasons, Lic AP 1,555.00131199 09102/2011 Shelwin Williams Co AP 156.04131200 0910212011 Springbrook Software, Inc. AP 10,500.00131201 09102/2011 Sorensens True Value AP Void 395.06131202 0910212011 Sprint AP 39.99131203 0910212011 State Disbursement Unit AP 276.00131204 09102/2011 State Disbursement Unit AP 441.00131205 09102/2011 State Disbursement Unit AP 221.00131206 0910212011 State Disbursement Unit AP 174.00131207 09102/2011 State Disbursement Unit AP 572.00131208 0910212011 State Disbursement Unit AP 208.50131209 09102/2011 Stradling Yocca Carlson & Raut AP 5,401.17131210 09102/2011 Talley Oil Inc. AP 7,727.00131211 09/02/2011 Tee-Dee-Us Auto Service AP 143.38

BR - Checks by Date (0911212011 - 8:57 AM) Page 2

Check No Check Date Name Comment ModuleVoid Clear Date Amount

131212 0910212011 Tenninix Processing Center AP 733.32131213 0910212011 Tire Wodd Car Care Center, In AP 1,040.14131214 0910212011 Tree Doctor Rx Landcare AP 5,740.00131215 09102/2011 Triangle Rock Products AP 273.44131216 09102/2011 U.S. Bancorp Equipment Finance AP 92.56131217 09102/2011 Realty Executives, Armando Dia AP 66.74131218 09102/2011 Steve & Claudia Curutchague AP 74.39131219 0910212011 Harmail Pooni AP 17.28131220 0910212011 Robert and Diana Gomez AP 40.82131221 09/0212011 Marisa Castaneda AP 15.30131222 09102/2011 DLP Real Estate, Inc. AP 5.85131223 09102/2011 FAS-ARM Utilities, LLC AP 62.57131224 09/0212011 Mayra Vargas-Iniguez AP 2.85131225 09/02/2011 Simeon and Raquel Lagroma, Jr AP 64.55131226 09/02/2011 Hannah Reid AP 38.39131227 09102/2011 James P Silva, Ranches AP 3.33131228 09102/2011 Ji Sheng AP 72.41131229 09102/2011 Robert Whitehead AP 49.97131230 09102/2011 U1ises Robles AP 38.63131231 09/0212011 Molly McColloch AP 31.80131232 0910212011 Jerrold Hillesheim AP 40.91131233 09102/2011 Neftali Flores AP 21.71131234 09102/2011 Youssef Hadweh AP 9.49131235 0910212011 ThienPham AP 70.44131236 0910212011 WeihuaSong AP 74.39131237 0910212011 Westamerica Bank - Cafeteria P AP 8,537.08131238 0910212011 Westside Water Conditioning AP 122.50131239 0910212011 Windecker Inc AP 1,409.94131240 09102/2011 Timothy C. Winek AP' 112.00131241 0910212011 Young's Air Conditioning AP 1,248.00131242 0910212011 Young's Automotive AP 908.36131243 09/0612011 Board ofEqualization AP 2,000.00131244 09106/2011 Board ofEqualization AP 732.00131246 0910912011 ABS Direct, Inc. AP 3,749.74131247 09109/2011 Ameripride Valley Unifonn Serv AP 262.56131248 09/09/2011 Aramark Uniform Ser Inc AP 247.05131249 0910912011 AT&T AP 15.57131250 09109/2011 Backflow Apparatus & Valve Co. AP 300.55131251 0910912011 Bank ofAmerica AP 5.60131252 09/0912011 Todd Baker AP 330.00131253 09109/2011 Jacob Bento AP 50.00131254 09109/2011 Bonander Pontiac, Inc. AP 98.48131255 0910912011 Brenntag Pacific Inc AP 2,179.25131256 09/09/2011 Bruce's Tire Inc AP 17.50131257 09109/2011 BSK AP 400.00131258 09109/2011 Cavenaugh & Associates AP 499.00131259 09109/2011 Cavenaugh & Associates AP 499.00131260 09/09/2011 City ofLivingston AP 120.00131261 0910912011 Courtesy AP 1,072.69131262 0910912011 City ofLos Banos Utility AP 35.45131263 09109/2011 Don's Mobile Glass AP 779.85131264 0910912011 EMEDCO AP 71.84131265 09109/2011 Emergency Vehicle Outfitters AP 400.83131266 0910912011 ABY MFG Group. Inc. AP 101.26131267 09/0912011 Fastenal Company AP 157.81131268 0910912011 Ferguson Enterprises Inc AP 337.45131269 09109/2011 Fisher Scientific Company, LLC AP 277.02131270 0910912011 Paula Fitzgerald AP 312.40131271 09109/2011 Alfonso Flores AP 238.00131272 09109/2011 Angelica Fernandez AP 50.00131273 09/0912011 Gibbs International, Inc AP 842.91131274 09109/2011 Surina Gonzales AP 238.00

BR - Checks by Date (09/1212011 - 8:57 AM) Page 3

Check No Check Date Name Comment ModuleVoid Clear Date Amount

131275 09109/2011 Gordon's Truck & Equipment Rep AP 235.97131276 0910912011 Grainger Parts Operations AP 20.12131277 0910912011 Greater San Joaquin Umpire Ass AP 1,848.00131278 0910912011 Greater Yosemite Council, BSA AP 200.00131279 09109/2011 Helena Chemical Co Inc AP 1,643.61131280 09109/2011 ZinaHolden AP 88.00131281 0910912011 Holt Bros AP 541.51131282 0910912011 Interstate Truck Center, LLC AP 123.15131283 09109/2011 Key Seal Products, Inc. AP 343.12131284 09109/2011 Los Banos Arts Council AP 1,149.43131285 09109/2011 Los Banos Express Oil & Lube AP 37.51131286 09109/2011 Los Banos Vet Clinic AP 3,916.25131287 0910912011 Marfab Inc AP 83.89131288 09/0912011 McElvany Inc AP 544,278.04131289 0910912011 McNamara Sports Inc AP 806.08131290 09109/2011 Merced County Association of G AP 15,136.00131291 09109/2011 Merced County Regional Waste M AP 2,837.79131292 0910912011 MetroPCS, Inc. AP 50.00131293 09109/2011 Napa Auto Parts AP 11.68131294 09/09/2011 Nextel AP 1,612.07131295 0910912011 North Central Laboratories AP 199.40131296 09109/2011 The Office City AP 237.04131297 09109/2011 OSE AP 1,537.77131298 0910912011 O'Reilly Auto Parts AP 3,695.08131299 0910912011 P G & E Company AP 10.12131300 0910912011 Pacifico Sol, Inc. AP 1,134.20131301 09109/2011 PERS - Public Employees AP 117,638.91131302 09/0912011 Pinnacle Medical Group AP 409.00131303 09109/2011 Precision Inspection Co., Inc. AP 47.50131304 09109/2011 Protech Security & Electronics AP 240.00131305 09/09/2011 Paula Perez AP 500.00131306 09109/2011 JeremyRahn AP 217.00131307 09109/2011 Razzari AP 251.01131308 0910912011 Recall Secure Destruction Serv AP 243.88131309 09109/2011 SNUAPCD AP 212.00131310 0910912011 SNUAPCD AP 80.00131311 0910912011 SNUAPCD AP 117.00131312 0910912011 Safe TLite AP 269.59131313 0910912011 The Saw Shop AP 84.00131314 0910912011 Save Mart Supermarkets AP 182.90131315 09/0912011 Sharpening Shop AP 831.64131316 0910912011 Sherwin Williams Co AP 16.70131317 09109/2011 Sierra Chemical Co AP 1,305.02131318 09109/2011 Sorensens True Value AP 809.54131319 09109/2011 Spriggs Inc AP 133.38131320 09109/2011 Nelida Sandoval AP 325.00131321 09109/2011 Talley Oil Inc. AP 2,720.69131322 09109/2011 Pravin Lal AP 29.19131323 09109/2011 Aaron and Rebecca Wallace AP 62.74131324 09109/2011 Pravin Lal AP 66.52131325 09109/2011 PravinLal AP 7.30131326 0910912011 Century 21 M & M, Mario Zazuet AP 52.45131327 09109/2011 Paul and Pearl Heras AP 79.62131328 0910912011 Dana & Bonny Howell AP 50.21131329 0910912011 Jaime Avelar AP 39.63131330 0910912011 PMZ Real Estate, Sandie Perry AP 1.52131331 0910912011 Realty Executives, Armando Dia AP 48.79131332 0910912011 Remax, Tammy Miller AP 4.19131333 09109/2011 Randell & Dawn Reinhardt AP 65.84131334 0910912011 Gilbert Sandoval AP 22.50131335 0910912011 Linda Mae Torres AP 16.59131336 09/09/2011 Remax, Tammy Miller AP 19.36

BR - Checks by Date (09/1212011 - 8:57 AM) Page 4

Check No Check Date Name Comment Module Void Clear Date Amount

131337 09/09/2011 Fred Thommen AP 87.50131338 09/09/2011 John & Paula Silva AP 36.97131339 09/09/2011 Berj Moosekian AP 24.63131340 09/09/2011 Bill & Linda Liu AP 79.62131341 09/09/2011 Jerry & Anna NiC;hols AP 16.81131342 09/09/2011 DLP Real Estate AP 73.70131343 09/09/2011 FemRenton AP 51.59131344 09/0912011 RockyPoon AP 69.17131345 09/09/2011 Elba & Luis Sanchez AP 50.76131346 09/0912011 Yolanda Gonzalez AP 33.52131347 09/0912011 Craig & Emily Morris AP 52.73131348 09/0912011 Silverio and Maria Ceja AP 30.83131349 09/09/2011 Steve Sequeira AP 59.30131350 09/09/2011 Pablo M or Josephine Dominguez AP 86.90131351 09/09/2011 Gloria Berber AP 19.29131352 09109/2011 Radames and Claudia Lopez AP 40.91131353 0910912011 Jesse Salinas AP 48.79131354 09109/2011 V. Lee George AP 43.96131355 09/09/2011 Craig & Craig Prof. Services, AP 48.79131356 09109/2011 Ignacio Esqueda AP 6.75131357 09109/2011 Jorge Diaz AP 42.95131358 09/0912011 IrmaChiu AP 16.06131359 09/09/2011 Zane Perry AP 16.59131360 09/09/2011 Robert Vargas AP 20.53131361 09109/2011 Shannon Colon AP 30.37131362 09109/2011 Lance Contreras AP 38.87131363 09109/2011 Jason Berriz AP 13.58131364 09109/2011 Century 21 M&M, Eblin Albomoz AP 41.59131365 09109/2011 Gloria Hollins AP 46.81131366 09109/2011 QingXin Yu AP 16.59131367 09/0912011 California Equity Management AP 9.74131368 09109/2011 Martha Ocana Casango AP 16.59

II.,131369 09/09/2011 Amarjeet Sidhu AP 15.98'1

" 131370 09/09/2011 Penik Tascian AP 75.68131371 09/09/2011 Arlette Crews AP 46.81131372 09/09/2011 MoiNguyen AP 48.79131373 09109/2011 Jeremy Jimenez AP 18.37131374 09/09/2011 Susana Reyes AP 58.63131375 09/0912011 Agustin Gonzalez AP 56.67131376 09/09/2011 Bonnie Stoetzl AP 68.66131377 09109/2011 Janice Falcone AP 100.00131378 09/09/2011 Jose Rumayor AP 77.05131379 09/09/2011 Merced Homes Realty AP 88.18131380 09/0912011 Westside Water Conditioning AP 214.50131381 09109/2011 Young's Air Conditioning AP 386.00

Total for Valid Checks: 986,668.71

Break in Check Sequence due to the followingCheck # 131077-131099, 131245 (payroll checks)

BR - Checks by Date (09/1212011 - 8:57 AM)

Total Valid Checks:Total Void Checks:

Total Checks:

Page

2783

281

5

CITY OF LOS BANOSCITY COUNCIL I REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MINUTES

SEPTEMBER 7, 2011

ACTION MINUTES - These minutes are prepared to depict actiontaken for agenda items presented to the City Council. For greaterdetail of this meeting refer to the electronic media (CD and/or audio)kept as a permanent record.

CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Pro Tem Faria called the City Council/RedevelopmentAgency Meeting to order at the hour of 7:00 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Police Chief Brizzee led the pledge of allegiance.

ROLL CALL - MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL I REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYPRESENT: Council Members Tom Faria, Scott Silveira, Joe Sousa, Elizabeth Stone,Absent: Mayor Michael Villalta.

STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: City Attorney Vaughn, City Clerk/Human ResourcesDirector Mallonee, City Manager Rath, Police Chief Brizzee, Fire Chief Guintini, PublicWorks Director/City Engineer Fachin, Redevelopment Agency Director Post, PlanningDirector Fitzgerald, Accounting & Budget Supervisor and Information TechnologyDirector Spalding.

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Motion by Silveira, seconded byStone to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion carried by the affirmative actionof all City Council / Redevelopment Agency Members present, Villalta absent.

PRESENTATION BY THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROLDISTRICT REGARDING THE HEALTHY AIR LIVING OUTREACH CAMPAIGN. JohnCadrette, Compliance Manager for the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control Districtfrom the Modesto Office spoke regarding the Healthy Air Living Outreach Campaignwhich included a PowerPoint presentation and a video.

There was Council Member discussion regarding if the pollution generated in the BayArea reach this area, how much pollution is generated and by what types of pollutants,how the Bay Area communities coastal onshore breezes and cooler temperatures allowfor high pollution levels and better air quality, if you exceed the standard in onecommunity in the San Joaquin Valley it counts the entire San Joaquin Valley, howMerced County has better air days then neighboring communities, the fairness of thesituation and regulations in sight of the economic issues.

Informational item only, no action to be taken.

PUBLIC FORUM: MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS ON ANY ITEM OF PUBLIC INTEREST

THAT IS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY; INCLUDES AGENDA ANDNON-AGENDA ITEMS. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS.SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO A FIVE (5) MINUTE PRESENTATION. DETAILEDGUIDELINES ARE POSTED ON THE COUNCIL CHAMBER INFORMATIONALTABLE. Mayor Pro Tem Faria opened the public forum. GARY WILBURN, Los BanosArts Council, spoke regarding their current plans and future events planned to includeThe Devil Mountain Jazz Band, Trailer Park Troubadours, Pianist Tom Bach, GuitaristDavid Burgess, and Singer Marcus James and his group, Irish singer ShamessKennedy, Pacheco Pass Quilters Show, how they received a grant from Target whichwill be used for an after school visual arts program, big night dinnerprogram/performance on March 18, 2012; STEVE HAMMOND, representing SenatorSal Canella's office and presented a 9-11 proclamation recognizing the 9-11 Eventbeing held on September 11, 2011 in Los Banos and asked Pastor Nelson to comeforward to received the recognition who than spoke of the 9-11 program events beingheld that day in remembrance of the 3000+ lives lost; JOHN WHALA, Los BanosChamber of Commerce, spoke regarding the upcoming Fall Street Faire on September17, 2011 and the events planned for the day, the October 8 & 9, 2011 Tomato Festival,and the Readers Choice Awards being held on October 20, 2011; ANNA BALATTIBROOKS and NANCY YOUNG-BURGESS, spoke regarding CASA and the fundraisingWild West Hoedown event being held on October 22, 2011 and encouraged all toattend or get involved in CASA who are advocates of the best interests of abused andneglected children in the court system. No one else came forward to speak and thepublic forum was closed.

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA. Motion by Sousa,seconded by Stone to approve the consent agenda as follows: Check Register for#130744 - #131076 in the Amount of $1,393,536.34; Minutes for the August 3, 2011City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting; Minutes for the August 12, 2011Adjourned City Council / Redevelopment Agency Meeting; Minutes for the August 17,2011 City Council/ Redevelopment Agency Meeting; Minutes for the August 24, 2011Adjourned City Council/ Redevelopment Agency Meeting; Street Closure Request fromthe Los Banos Chamber of Commerce to Hold the Annual Fall Street Faire on Saturday,September 17,2011 from 5:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m, in the Downtown Area and to Close i h

and K Streets, i h and J Streets, 5th and K Streets, 5th and J Streets, and if VendorCount Warrants it to Additionally Close off i h and I Streets, and 5th and I Streets, and toAllow Vendors to be Set Up in the Center of Each Street; City Council Resolution No.5351 - Approving the Revised Project List for the Use of Proposition 1B 2008-2009Cycle Allocated Funds; City Council Resolution No. 5352 - Approving the Acceptanceof an Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) in the Amount of $14,034(2011-DJ-BX-2348) and Amending the 201'1-2012 Fiscal Year (FY) Budget byIncreasing the Appropriation Amount of the JAG Account for Expenditures andRevenues in the Amount of $14,034; City Council Resolution No. 5353 - Approving aSide Letter/Contract Extension through June 30, 2012 by and between the City of LosBanos and the Los Banos Police Officers Association. The motion carried by theaffirmative action of all City Council/Redevelopment Agency Members present, Villaltaabsent.

'-0" _

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY UPDATE. No report.

ADVISEMENT OF PUBLIC NOTICES (One Report). Planning Director Fitzgeraldstated that a public hearing will be held by the Los Banos Planning Commission toconsider a Use Permit to allow the operation of a Home Occupation Business Licensewith one employee at a residence for Anthony Gomes Electric Service. The subjectproperty is located at 2028 Princeton Court, Assessor Parcel Number 083-310-058.

CITY MANAGER I EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT. No report.

CITY COUNCIL I REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBER REPORTS.

JOE SOUSA: Thanked Ann McCauley for all her hard work on the Movie Night, spokeregarding the National Conference for Community Action Agency that he recentlyattended and noted the number of people living at the poverty level, the September 9,2012 Annual Flag Raising Ceremony at Volta School in honor of 9-11 and encouragedall to attend and acknowledge those who have served and always remember and neverforget and thanked Ms. Susanna Hempworth and Ms. Whitehurst at for putting the eventon.

ELIZABETH STONE: Attended Movie Night and spoke to how absolutely incredible theevent was and thanked Ann McCauley for organizing the event, PG & E and Ronny'slandscaping for helping make it happen, reminded everyone about the Salute to SeniorFair being held on September 30, 2011 at the Community Center.

TOM FARIA: Reminded all about the 9-11 events being held on September 11, 2011,thanked all who had something to do with protecting us, how everyone works to protectus and he is the master of ceremonies at the 9-11 event. He noted how the schools arerunning quite well, Los Banos High School is shrinking and Pacheco High School isgrowing, not nearly so crowded on campus and everything is running smoothly, peaceand prosperity to all.

SCOTT SILVEIRA: Attended Movie Night with his family and how it was a great nightand a great time, thanked Ann McCauley for all her work, Annual Smorgasbord Dinnerbeing held at St. John's Lutheran Church being held on October 11, 2011, he statedthat he dropped his shoes off at the UPS store to add to the 9-11 Collection, and heechoed all the sentiments stated about 9-11 and encouraged all to attend.

MAYOR MICHAEL VILLALTA: Absent.

CLOSED SESSION - CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTINGLITIGATION, PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (A) OF SECTION 54956.9 OF THEGOVERNMENT CODE. NAME OF CASE: ' LARRY ANDERSON, ET AL VS. CITY OFLOS BANOS, COUNTY OF MERCED SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. CY002069.Direction to staff only; no action taken.

ADJOURNMENT. The meeting was adjourned at the hour of 8:30 p.m.

APPROVED:

Michael Villalta, MayorATTEST:

Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk

LOS BanosAi tile Crossroads (~r Ca/~forllia

TO:

FROM:

DATE:

Agenda Staff Report

Mayor & City Council Members

Elaine Post, RDA Director f-1'September 21,2011

SUBJECT: Expansion of the Merced County Regional Enterprise Zone Boundaries

TYPE OF REPORT:

Recommendation:

Consent Agenda

Approve and adopt the Resolution to expand the Merced County Regional EnterpriseZone Map

Background:

The City of Los Banos currently participates in the Merced County Regional EnterpriseZone which was established December 17, 2006 and has jurisdiction over the existingzone and proposed expansion area.

The Enterprise Zone can be expanded to include those businesses that are either newto the area or were missed during the initial Enterprise Zone process. Land includedwithin the expanded area is zoned for industrial, commercial or has a conditional usepermit for business.

Approving this Resolution would allow the City to participate in the Expansion of theZone.

Reviewed by:

-----~Rath, City Manager

Attachments:

ResolutionProposed Expansion Map - Merced CountyProposed Expansion Site Location MapExpansion ApplicationsLetter Requesting Expansion

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOSAPPROVING THE EXPANSION OF THE MERCED REGIONAL ENTERPRISE ZONE

BOUNDARIES

WHEREAS, the City of Los Banos currently participates in an enterprise zone that wasestablished on December 17, 2006 and has jurisdiction over the existing zone (Exhibit A) as wellas proposed expansion areas; and

WHEREAS, the City of Los Banos wishes to expand the boundaries of its enterprise zone toinclude the geographic areas set forth in the attached boundary map (Exhibit B), as inclusion intothe zone has been requested by the business owners; and

WHEREAS, land included with the proposed expansion area is zoned for industrial orcommercial use or has a Conditional Use Permit; and

WHEREAS, basic infrastructure is available to the area that would be included in the proposedexpansion area; and

WHEREAS, the City ofLos Banos will submit a written request as required to the CaliforniaDepartment ofHousing and Community Development to have its enterprise zone boundariesexpanded.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City ofLos Banos does hereby support andapprove the Merced County Regional Enterprise Zone expansion into the areas as shown inExhibit B.

The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Los Banos City Council on September21 2011, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Michael Villalta, Mayor

ATTEST:

Lucille Mallonee, City Clerk

J ---..i....t.-~~_,

/',/

//

MerCed

Merced County

I

,!c;]-l,,--- I!" !ill I'-----.J

r~1:/@J,ooi'I~ LJLIWJ

II

rc;--i\\\[jJj~-lJ@J "Ii~L:_~ L__,---'

'Iffil ' 1'0~'(0'--J ,0[Llg~~[f'l~) L ~EJ

"--1r L!l r

'~~;":,,II <}'>'

,'i~:;} --- -00 ----i

• i)''')'':' ';',' .' -.--- )...---------,..._y~,-"--------,-

~:~

:~~

~"~'"

~" .., g

[ ~."

,1' ,;:'_L.--/"

/'

Merced Regional Enterprise ZoneExpansion #2

~\

I!l

I!l

/' , '" 0 f"':~~":'/; 'c- .' "~ A / ~

~',--,,~' \ / " [",-----".i, . -----,/-----..-- --...-

\,/ / 0..; .-,.. , ".1-"\ 1---"1'" , ,-"I ' . "~,n,-::/'/

/ ~"'r' ,...-;.,,/c' ,'~

ii':~::' '/2,// "L~\

-< l.)! i, \

'(\

/ ~'. ~.""0 // 0 Mc.erceL.d ~tegional Enterprise Zone Expansion #2

" / Ity Iml s~ //."/ : Urban Plan Boundaries (SUDP)

"';/' " Sphere of Influence

,I, . iii ',:.1 Merced Regional Enterprise Zone /-1 ""lii3;;:;.../,,::0':" >,;;, ,'I''.',: ," , "1';11 1"'-"" 'V,"" VCU"L- -l', Jv"'- ."t:,;nr.'>~,'"\'~r~'/,1_l> \',":'< - (,:',;,;f ~, I,"

........ _\--L 0") (

tl:i

S.1-1'e"1-1'rt

>

~~~AU GIS data contained herein It. :Or reprer.enmtlon arnj general In~ulrle~ only MOSS makes no 'Warrsnly or guaran~e regillrdlng theqe a«uracy ofth" mapsordata MOSS Isnotrea~nslllie I'orany efrllTS oromlsslonalhalmlghtoccUf OIflclallnformatlon regB.rtIlng specificparcels,plansorott1efdallllllhouldbetlbt!unlldlromollleJalreCQl'doradop~dooumenl&

"'ERCED OATA SPECIAL SeRViCeS

W.ES

Map Pnntftd August 8, 2011o 15,000 30.000

i:sca.1BIn Faet

See Overview Mapfor Site'Location

------------....~....~127IL -:--: ~ ....'..;;;. ~/-----, .,/--------- \_-,,/

-----------....'....'.... '-'","........................-"-"-"..._-----_...

IOverview Mapl\,\,\

'>,I,\,

\"

" ",.......Site Location ' ...........

D Enterprise Zone Expansion #2

_ Enterprise Zone Expansion #1

D Merced Regional Enterprise Zone

Agricultural Zone

_ Commercial Zone

_ Industrial Zone

_ Conditional Use Permit Area

City Limits

Urban Plan Boundaries (SUDP)

Sphere of Influence

IW5SSIHf\CED Oll.fA SPECIAL S£RVIIJES

All GIS data contaIned herem IS for representation and generalmquines only MOSS makes no warranty or guaranteeregarding the accuracy afthe maps or data MOSS IS not responsible for any errors or omiSSions that might occur OmmalInformatlOn regarding speCIfic parcels, plans or other data should be obtamed from official record or adopted documents

Exhibit B

Map Pnnted August 8, 2011

500 1,000

Scale In Feet

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENTERPRISE ZONE MONTHLY REPORTEZ·Remittance-7/08

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDIVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

ENTERPRISE ZONE PROGRAM

Expansion Application August 1, 2011

Instructions: Applicant to complete Sections 1, 2, & 3. See Expansion Application Submission Guidelines for furtherinstructions.

Section 1. Contact Information Expansion Acreage

Enterprise Zone:Merced Regional Enterprise Zone Original Zone Acreage: 42,731

Basis· 15% X 20%Current ExpansionCapacity 4532.83 185.66 Acres

--- ----i~-d~~i;;~~--l 0 Acres

--"C~;;;~~~~;~/-[-'-----'-75~45-""'''A~;;~''P._~ __ ~ ..~~.~..._._...._.L .. ••• ._._••••_.__.. _. __

Other: 110.21 Acres

Cities of Atwater, Dos Palos, Gustine,Livingston, Los Banos, Merced and theunincorporated areas of Merced County

Jurisdictions:

ExpansionAcreage

1--- --1- -; RequestedContact Name: Andrea Baker TOTAL 185.66Acres

TelephoneNumber:

209-724-2003New Cumulative ZoneAcreage 44,793.83 Acres

ProposedExpansion Name:

Merced County Enterprise Zone ExpansionNumber 2

Balance(Remaining Capacity) 4347.17 Acres

Expansion Type:

Intra-jurisdictional Expansion:X ContiguousX Non-Contiguous

Inter-jurisdictional Expansion:o Adding a contiguous jurisdictiono Using a right-of-way to establish contiguity.

Section 2. Required Documentation

Exhibit Name Document (Optional) Applicant Comments

Exhibit A Cover Letter

Certified Resolution or Ordinance

Exhibit B(Jurisdiction Name) (Resolution #)

, ~"--

Exhibit C Map

Exhibit D Infrastructure Assessment

Exhibit E Street Range Listing

X Digitized

Exhibit F Boundary Descrip~ion .'»' _.J'!I?Q _~~~__~_"~o Description

Intra-jurisdictional X Exhibit G1Exhibit G Non-Contiguous Justification(if applicable) Inter-jurisdictional o Exhibit G2Right-of-way Description

*Basis: If the original enterprise zone area is no greater than 13 square miles (8,320 acres), the zone may be expanded by 20%.

Page 1 of 210/2009

Expansion Application (cont)

Section 3 Instructions: For each expansion identify the number of acres and the number of existing businesses within theproposed expansion area.

Original Zone Acreage: 42731 Original Expansion Capacity (acres): 6410.00

Expansion NameExpansion Acreage Requested

Exp#

Merced Regional Enterprise Zone

Expansion Number 2

185.66

Number of Businesses

EffectiveDate

Balance(Remaining

Acres)

Industrial I Commercial I Total

1 Merced County Enterprise Zone Expansion I 0Number 2

23 2 8/1/2011 14347.17

1-J- -1/DateEnterprise Zone Signatory

I have approved the information contained in this expansion application. I understand that the effective date of theexpansion will be the date the expansion approval letter is mailed by the Department.

~Wb.---/(' ftJ~~

Page 2 of2

~=-~,;o,.Jl"",,"~"l_"1.t.'t~'m.'!IJl~\iII~=n.~"t'=~M~~'<:\~iIi!"~~~lI.~~~~~~';:»~~il'~~~I\"=""'"'I'<l-"",=""""","""~imlii! """"-'I~"",~~-="'"~"3!'W"sI~~~~.=...lr,""""",....~:'!l!l;m~'IlIt'ttY~..iI::i:'~J:r~,~~~t~}~\1'1....1,'11"",::;rj::o"'ts,~cirl!!\:~~=<lWr""~'

STATE OF CALIFORNIAENTERPRISE ZONE MONTHLY REPORTEZ-Remittance-7/08

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDIVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

ENTERPRISE ZONE PROGRAM

Expansion Application August 1, 2011

Instructions: Applicant to complete Sections 1, 2, & 3. See Expansion Application Submission Guidelines for furtherinstructions.

Section 1. Contact Information Expansion Acreage

Enterprise Zone:Merced Regional Enterprise Zone Original Zone Acreage: 42,731

Basis* 15% X 20%

AcresTOTAL 117.66

Current ExpansionCapacity 4532._?.~_______________ 117.66 Acres

Industrial i 0 Acres---------------------+----------------------------------

Commercial ! 9.39 cres-------------Oth;~-r-------108:27-----A~~;~-

Cities of Atwater, Dos Palos, Gustine,Livingston, Los Banos, Merced and theunincorporated areas of Merced County

Andrea Baker

Jurisdictions:

Contact Name:

ExpansionAcreage

1-- -+ ---1 Requested

TelephoneNumber:

209-724-2003New Cumulative ZoneAcreage 44,725.83 Acres

ProposedExpansion Name:

Merced County Enterprise Zone ExpansionNumber 2

Balance(Remaining Capacity) 4415.17 Acres

Expansion Type:

Intra-jurisdictional Expansion:X ContiguousX Non-Contiguous

Inter-jurisdictional Expansion:o Adding a contiguous jurisdictiono Using a right-ot-way to establish contiguity.

Section 2. Required Documentation

Exhibit Name Document (Optional) Applicant Comments

Exhibit A Cover Letter

Certified Resolution or Ordinance

Exhibit B(Jurisdiction Name) (Resolution #)

Exhibit C Map

Exhibit D Infrastructure Assessment

Exhibit E Street Range Listing

X Digitized

Exhibit F Boundary Description Map

o Description

Intra-jurisdictional X Exhibit G1ExhibitG Non-Contiguous Justification(if applicable) Inter-jurisdictional o ExhibitG2Right-of-way Description

* Basis: If the original enterprise zone area is no greater than 13 square miles (8,320 acres), the zone may be expanded by 20%.

Page 1 of2~n/'lnnn

Expansion Application (cont)

Section 3 Instructions: For each expansion identify the number of acres and the number of existing businesses within theproposed expansion area.

Original Zone Acreage: 42731

Expansion Name

Original Expansion Capacity (acres): 6410.00

Expansion Acreage Requested

Exp#

Merced Regional Enterprise Zone

Expansion Number 2

67.34

Number ofBusinesses

Industrial I Commercial I Total

EffectiveDate

Balance(Remaining

Acres)

1 Merced County Enterprise Zone Expansion I 0Number 2

23 2 8/1/2011 14415.17

I have approved the information contained in this expansion application. I understand that the effective date of theexpansion will be the date the expansion approval letter is mailed by the Department.

Enterprise Zone Signatory Date

Page 2 of2

Enterprise Zone ManagerMerced Couney Departmentof Workforce Invesrment1880 Wardrobe AvenueMerced, CA 95341[209) 724-2001

Cley ofAtwater750 Bellevue RoadAtwater, CA 95301(209) 357-6369

Cley of Dos Palos2174 BlossomDos Pa los, CA 93620(209) 392-2174

Cley of Gustine

682 Third StreetGustine, CA 95322(209) 854-6471

City of LiVIngston1416 "C" StreetLivingston, CA 95334(209) 394-8041

CIty of Los Banos520 "J" Streetlos Bano~, CA 93635(209) 827-7000 Ext. 150

City of Merced678 West 18th StreetMerced, CA 95340(209) 385-4788

Couney of MercedCommerce, Aviation andEconomic Development2507 Heritage DriveAtwater, CA 95301(209) 385-7686

www.MercedRegionaIEZ.com

Aug 1,2011

John Nunn, Jr., Enterprise Zone Program ManagerDepartment of Housing and Community DevelopmentDivision of Financial A~sistance

J 800 Third Street, Suite 390Sacramento, CA 94252-2054

Re: Merced Regional Enterprise Zone Expansion #2

Dear Mr. Nunn:Enclosed is Merced Regional Enterprise Zone's completed expansion application. I am sub­mitting this application for your review and approval of the Merced Regional Enterprise ZoneExpansion #2 to include an additional 67.34 acres. Included in this application is the com­pleted Expansion application, the required documents, exhibits B-G, zoning verification ofCommercial Use Permits, and Resolutions provided by 7 jurisdictions that make up theMerced Regional Enterprise Zone.

This is Merced Regional Enterprise Zone's second expansion application. The initial zonewas set at 42,7300.96 acres. Using the expansion formula provided by the State of CaliforniaDepartment of Housing and Community Development the Merced Regional Enterprise Zonemay expand up to 6,410 acres. The Merced Regional Enterprise Zone is requesting an expan­sion of the existing zone of 185.66, leaving 4347.17 acres left for any future needs. The185.66 acres proposed for inclusion in the Merced Regional Enterprise Zone are both Con­tiguous and Non-Contiguous, and is comprised of 75.45 acres for Commercial and 110.21for Zoned Agriculture with attached Commercial Use Permit (CUP).

Since its inception on December 17, 2006 The Merced Regional Enterprise Zone has helped444 businesses create 1700 new jobs and retain up to 7768 existing jobs. With this expansion,we expect to increase those numbers.

The Merced County Department of Workforce Investment, as the Merced Regional Enter­prise Zone Manager, is submitting this expansion request for your consideration in accor­dance with regulations governing Enterprise Zone activity and expa~sion opportunities.Thank you for your time and consideration of this expansion request. Please feel free to con­tact me with questions or comments regarding this application.

Respectfully,

atlu~d::c~Andrea BakerMerced Regional Enterprise Zone Manager

At the Crossrol1'ls (~f Cal~fontit1

TO:

FROM:

DATE:

Agenda Staff Report

Honorable Mayor &City Council Members

Mark Fachin, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer~~September 21,2011

SUBJECT: Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) Update

TYPE OF REPORT: Non Consent

I

" Recommendation:That the City Council receive the staff report in regards to the Regional TransportationImpact Fee (RTIF), and provide direction to staff in regards to this matter.

Background:The following is a brief timeline in regards to the Regional Transportation Impact Fee(RTIF).

A) In May 2005, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the initial RTIFstudy prepared by Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG).

B) Effective August 1, 2005, the cities of Atwater, Dos Palos, Los Banos,Merced, and the County of Merced began collecting RTIF fees through theirpermitting process.

C) In August of 2008, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving theimplementation of the updated RTIF study.

D) On April 15, 2009, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1086 (seeAttachments) which established new non-residential RTIF fees, per theapproved updated RTIF study.

Discussion:The current RTIF fees that were adopted per Ordinance NO.1 086 are:

Residential, single-family $3,115 per dwelling unitResidential, multi-family $1,892 per dwelling unitRetail commercial, general $4,146 per 1,000 sq. ft.

floor areaRetail commercial, high $12,082 per 1,000 sq. ft.Turnover floor areaRetail commercial, low $2,780 per 1,000 sq. ft.Turnover floor areaRetail commercial, over $7,161 per 1,000 sq. ft.50,000 sq. ft. floor areaOffice commercial $3,337 per 1,000 sq. ft.

floor areaIndustriallAg processing $1,409 per 1,000 sq. ft.

floor area

The RTIF Project List is:

A Bellevue Rd - connection to 99 - from new interchange to AtwaterB Mission Ave. - improvement - from 59 to 99 (not adding lanes)C SR 59 "Atwater-Merced Highway" realign from SR 99 to Bellevue Road w/ new SR 99

interchange0 SR 59 - widen to 4 lanes - from Mission Ave. to Childs Ave.E SR 59 - widen to 4 lanes - from 152 to Mission Ave.F SR 140 "Bradley Overhead" - widen to 4/5 lanes - from Parsons to Santa Fe Ave.G SR 140 - widen to 4/5 lanes - from Santa Fe Ave. to Campus ParkwayH SR 140/33 "Gustine Truck Route" - bypass GustineI SR 152 "Los Banos Bypass"J SR 165 - widen to 4/5 lanes - from Hilmar to Stanislaus County or alternate project to

reduce traffic on SR 165 through HilmarK Dos Palos road improvementsL Winton Parkway interchange improvements and wideninQM Campus Parkway from SR99 to Yosemite Ave.

Please find in the Attachments, the September 8,2011 MCAG staff report to the MCAGGoverning Board of the Fiscal Year 2010/2011 4th quarter RTIF report.

Fiscal Impact:The adoption of the RTIF does not have a fiscal impact on existing businesses withinth? City, as long as they do not increase square footage and/or intensify use. This feeis paid by developers for residential, commercial, and industrial projects and is paid atthe time of development of those projects.

Reviewed by:

Steve

Attachments:Ordinance No. 1086MCAG Staff Report

ORDINANCE NO.1 086

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF LOS BANOS AMENDING CHAPTER 18OF TITLE 3 OF THE LOS BANOS MUNICIPALCODE RELATING TO THE REGIONALTRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (RTIF)

The City Council of the City of Los Banos does ordain as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council in May 2005, adopted a Resolution approving theinitial RTIF Study prepared by Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG);and

WHEREAS, in accordance with State Law requiring annual RTIF review, theMCAG Governing Board at their January 17, 2008 meeting, completed its annual reviewof the RTIF program with the approval of an updated RTIF Study; and

WHEREAS, the City Council in August 2008, adopted a Resolution approving theimplementation of the updated RTIF Study; and

WHEREAS, provisions in the Municipal Code relating to the RTIF need to beupdated.

Section 1. Chapter 18 of Title 3 of the City of Los Banos Municipal Code ishereby revised to read as follows:

Title 3

FINANCE

Chapter 18

Sections:Sec. 3-18.01Sec. 3-18.02Sec. 3-18.03Sec. 3-18.04Sec. 3-18.05Sec. 3-18.06Sec. 3-18.07Sec. 3-18.08Sec. 3-18.09Sec. 3-18.10Sec. 3-18.11Sec. 3-18.12Sec. 3-18.13Sec. 3-18.14Sec. 3-18.15

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE(RTIF)

Intent.Purpose.Specific Findings.DefinitionsApplicability.Establishment of regional transportation impact fee.Findings.Exemptions.Credits.Collection of Fee.Regional transportation impact fee fund.Appeal process.Annual fee and program review.Severability.Effective Date.

Sec. 3-18.01 Intent.

(a) The City Council of the City of Los Banos finds that future development within theCounty of Merced to the year 2030 will result in traffic volumes in excess ofcapacity on the regional system of arterials, highways, and freeways asdesignated in this Ordinance.

(b) The City Council of the City of Los Banos finds that failure to expand the capacityof the existing circulation system will result in new development causingunacceptable levels congestion on the arterials, highways, and freeways of theregional system.

(c) The City Council also finds and declares that, in the absence of this chapterimposing a fair-share traffic fee upon new development, existing and futuresources of revenue are inadequate to fund substantial portions of the regionaltransportation system improvements needed to avoid unacceptable levels ofcongestion and related adverse impacts caused by new development.

Sec. 3-18.02 Purpose.

(a) The City Council of the City of Los Banos finds and determines that adoption ofthis regional transportation impact fee ordinance will raise additional revenuesneeded to construct improvements to accommodate traffic that will be generatedby new development within the County and City of Los Banos.

(b) The City Council also finds and declares that the Regional Transportation ImpactFee Study (MCAG, January 18, 2008) has determined the extent to which thenew development of land will generate traffic volumes impacting the roadwaysystem and that this chapter establishes a fair and equitable method fordistributing unfunded costs of transportation improvements necessary toaccommodate traffic volumes generated by such development.

Sec. 3-18.03 Specific Findings.

The need for regional transportation improvements and for the regionaltransportation impact fee established by the ordinance codified in this chapter arebased on the finding of the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Study prepared bythe Merced County Association of Governments whose Governing Board iscomposed of City Council members and County Supervisors from the County's six(6) cities and the County Board of Supervisors. The study has established thatgrowth to the year 2030 will affect the entire regional transportation system andtherefore that the area of impact for future development is appropriately the entireCounty of Merced. The Study made the following additional findings:

(a) PopUlation and employment within the County of Merced is anticipated toincrease by ninety-eight (98%) percent and eighty-two (82%) percent,respectively by the year 2030 and will result in Levels of Service E and F (asdefined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th edition) on existing arterials,highways, and freeways.

(b) The Regional Transportation Plan (MCAG, 2007) modeled and evaluated theeffect of projected growth to the year 2030 on all major arterials, highways, andfreeways in Merced County and found that without expansion, the transportationsystem would suffer severe congestion. Further, the plan showed that therecommended transportation improvements would accommodate the trafficanticipated in the year 2030 at the desired Level of Service D.

(c) Existing and future sources of public revenues are insufficient to fund all theneeded transportation improvements.

(d) The revenues generated by this regional transportation impact fee will provideadditional funds necessary to construct the transportation improvements and willhelp provide the additional capacity needed in the year 2030 to accommodatethe traffic generated by new development in the Cities and County of Merced.

(e) The regional transportation impact fee is a fair and equitable method ofdistributing the cost of transportation improvements among the development thatwill generate the increased traffic.

Sec. 3-18.04 Definitions.

2

(a) "Merced County" means the unincorporated areas of the County of Merced andthe incorporated areas of the six (6) cities within Merced County.

(b) "Regional system" means the following street, road, and highway segments:

(1) State Highways: the portions of Interstate 5 and State Routes 33, 59, 99,140,152,165 that lie within Merced County.

(2) Bradbury Rd. from Hwy. 165 to Hwy. 99.(3) Bloss Ave. from Hwy. 165 to Hwy. 99.(4) Westside Blvd. from Hwy. 165 to Hwy 99.(5) Lincoln Blvd. from Hwy. 140 to Peach Ave. in Livingston.(6) Main St. in Livingston from Peach Ave. to Hwy. 99.(7) Livingston-Cressey Rd. from Hwy. 99 to Santa Fe Ave.(8) Olive Ave. from Livingston-Cressey Rd. in Livingston to Santa Fe Ave. in Winton.(9) Santa Fe Ave. from the Stanislaus County line to Hwy. 59 I Olive Ave. in Merced.(10) Santa Fe Ave. from Plainsburg Rd. in Planada to the Madera County line.(11) Applegate Rd. from Hwy. 140 to Hwy. 99 in Atwater.(12) Winton Way from Hwy. 99 in Atwater to Santa Fe Ave. in Winton.(13) Buhach Rd. from Hwy. 140 to Santa Fe Ave..(14) Bellevue Rd. from Hwy. 99 to Lake Rd. or the Campus Parkway, including gaps.(15) Olive Ave. in Merced from Hwy. 59 to Campus Parkway.(16) G St. in Merced from Hwy. 99 to Bellevue Rd.(17) Mission Ave. from Hwy. 59 to Campus Parkway.(18) Plainsburg Rd. from Hwy. 99 to Hwy. 140.(19) $andy Mush Rd. from Hwy. 59 to Hwy. 99.(20) Henry Miller Avenue-east from Interstate 5 in Santa Nella, across State Route 165 to

Turner Island Road.(21) Los Banos to Gustine Route-along Volta Road, Ingomar Grade, Cottonwood Road and

Hunt Road to Gustine.(22) Sandy Mush RoadlTurner Island Road-west from State Route 99, across State Route

59 to Turner Island Road and south to State Route 152.(23) Washington Road-from Indiana Avenue to Highway 59.(24) Hutchins Road-from Carlucci Road to Indiana Avenue.(25) Indiana Avenue-from Highway 152 to Washington Road.(26) Walnut Avenue-in the County, from Livingston to Santa Fe Drive.(27) Le Grand Road-in the County, from Hwy 99 to Santa Fe Avenue.(28) Minturn Road-in the County, from Le Grand Road to the Madera County line.(29) Oakdale Road-in the County, from Highway 59 to the Stanislaus County line.(30) La Grange Road-in the County, from Highway 59's termination in Snelling to the

Stanislaus County line.(31) Merced Falls Road-in the County, from Highway 59's termination in Snelling to the

Mariposa County line.(32) The future Campus Parkway-from Highway 99 to end of route at Yosemite Avenue or

UC Merced County.(33) Gurr Road-from State Route 140 near the McSwain area to Sandy Mush Road.

(c) The "Regional transportation plan" means the document adopted by the MercedCounty Association of Governments on May 17, 2007.

(d) "Average weekday peak-hour trips" mean the average number of peak-hourvehicle trips to or from a designated land use Monday through Friday.

(e) "Peak-hour" means the one-hour long period during which the maximum amountof traffic occurs. Often the peak-hour is a rush period when commuters travel toand from work.

(f) "Trip generation rate" means the number of average weekday peak-hour tripsgenerated by a particular land use. The land use categories correspond to thoseused in the regional travel model maintained by MCAG. The trip generation ratefor each land-use category is the rate published by the Institute of TransportationEngineers, 6th Edition. The land use categories and peak-hour trip generationrates are as follows:

Residential, single-familyITE Code 210

3

Residential, multi-family 0.61 trips per(ITE Code 220) dwellinQ unitRetail commercial, general 1.86 trips per 1,000(ITE Codes 800-912 except sq. ft. floor areathose listed below)Retail commercial, high 10.86 trips per 1,000turnover (ITE Codes 831-837, sq. ft. floor area844-847,851-853,911-912)Retail commercial, low 1.25 trips per 1,000turnover (ITE Codes 814, sq. ft. floor area823,848,860,862,890)Retail commercial, over 3.58 trips per 1,00050,000 sq. ft. gross floor area sq. ft. floor area(ITE Code 820, and any 800-999 with 50,000+ SQ. ft.)Office commercial (ITE Codes 1.79 trips per 1,000710-770) SQ. ft. floor areaIndustrial (ITE Code 110-170) 0.75 trips per 1,000

SQ. ft. floor area

(g) "Development" means any discretionary or ministerial action by the City resultingin the issuance of grading, building, plumbing, mechanical, or electrical permits,conditional use permits or certificates of occupancy issued by the City toconstruct, to change the use of, a building or property.

Where development applies to a change in use of, or enlargement of an existingbuilding, the average weekday peak-hour trips shall be only the additional trips inexcess of those associated with the existing use.

(h) "Merced County Association of Governments" means the joint powers agencydelegated to manage and administer the regional transportation impact fee andwhose members are the incorporated Cities and the County of Merced.

(i) "Merced County Association of Governments Regional Transportation ImpactFee Trust Fund" or "trust fund" means the account to which regionaltransportation impact fees collected under this chapter are deposited with theMerced County Treasurer by the Cities and County for any lawful use asprovided in this chapter.

(j) "Regional Transportation Impact Fee Policy Board" (RTIF Policy Board) meansthose members of the MCAG Governing Board whose appointing jurisdiction hasadopted the ordinance codified in this chapter.

Sec. 3-18.05 Applicability.

This chapter shall apply only to new development and to any reconstruction ofexisting buildings that will generate additional vehicular trips. The provisions of thischapter shall take effect May 15, 2009.

Sec. 3-18.06 Establishment of regional transportation impact fee.

(a) The regional transportation impact fee is not intended to be the sole source offunding for construction of the regional system. Furthermore, the total amount offees collected pursuant to this chapter shall not exceed the cost of constructionof the regional system.

(b) The Merced County Association of Governments has calculated the regionaltransportation impact fee according to the following procedure:

(1) MCAG determined the total costs of the regional transportationimprovements.

(2) MCAG established a capital improvements program. This will include eachregional transportation improvement project with its total project cost, and

4

sources of funds to pay for the project, specifically showing the amount foreach project to be funded through the regional transportation impact fee.

(3) MCAG determined the total amount to be funded by the fee by summing thefee shares of each project in the capital improvements program.

(4) MCAG determined the total number of peak-hour trips associated with newdevelopment, for each land use category listed in Section 3-18.04(f) of thischapter, by using the MCAG traffic model and subtracting the number ofpeak-hour trips generated in Merced County by each category in the year2005 from the number of such trips generated by the same category in theyear 2030.

(5) MCAG determined a per-trip cost by dividing the total amount to be funded bythe fee by the total number of trips associated with new development.

(6) MCAG determined a cost per unit of development for the land use categorieslisted in Section 3-18.04(f) of this chapter. This cost will be calculated bymultiplying the per-trip cost by the average peak-hour trips per unit ofdevelopment. Units of development will be dwelling units for residential landuses, and 1,000 square feet of floor area for commercial, industrial, and otherland uses.

(7) The fee for each new development is calculated by multiplying the cost perunit of development by the number of units being developed.

(c) As shown in the regional transportation impact fee study, MCAG has determinedthat the cost per peak-hour trip is Three Thousand One Hundred Fifteen andNo/10aths ($3,115.00) Dollars.

(d) The regional transportation impact fee study has calculated the followingtransportation impact fee schedule for these land use categories:

Residential, sinQle-familv $3,115 per dwellinQ unitResidential, multi-familv $1,892 per dwellinQ unitRetail commercial, general $4,146 per 1,000 sq. ft.

floor areaRetail commercial, high $12,082 per 1,000 sq. ft.Turnover floor areaRetail commercial, low $2,780 per 1,000 sq. ft.Turnover floor areaRetail commercial, over $7,161 per 1,000 sq. ft.50,000 sa. ft. floor areaOffice commercial $3,337 per 1,000 sq. ft.

floor areaIndustriallAg processing $1,409 per 1,000 sq. ft.

floor area

(e) Should the applicant believe the land use category in subsection (d) of thissection is not appropriate for their application, the applicant may propose a moreappropriate development category, subject to the approval of the City Manager ortheir designee, and alternative trip generation rate from the ITE Trip GenerationCode noted in this chapter for use in calculation of the appropriate trip generationrate, or;

(f) Should the applicant believe the land use category in subsection (d) of thissection is not appropriate for their application, the applicant may have prepared,at their own expense, a trip generation study conducted by a licensed trafficengineer that forecasts the anticipated peak-hour trips for the proposeddevelopment. The study procedure and results shall require the approval of theCity Manager or their designee.

Sec. 3-18.07 Findings.

5

The City Council finds that the RTIFS:

(a) Identifies the purpose of the RTIF;(b) Identifies the use to which the fee will be put, including specific facilities;(c) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of

development project on which the fee is imposed;(d) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility

and type of development project on which the fee is imposed; and(e) Shows a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of

the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development onwhich the fee is imposed.

Sec. 3-18.08 Exemptions.

The following developments are exempted from payment of the fee required by thischapter:

The reconstruction of any building that has been destroyed by fire, flood, or naturaldisaster so as the reconstructed building both continues the prior use and generatesthe same or fewer trips as the original building.

Sec. 3-18.09 Credits.

(a) Where an applicant, otherwise subject to this chapter dedicates and/or improvesthose regional roads, highways, or freeways identified in Exhibit A of this chapterbeyond the requirements established in subsection (b) of this section, theapplicant shall receive a credit against his regional transportation impact fee.That credit shall be an amount equal to the land value of dedicated land and/orthe actual engineering and construction costs incurred at the time of thedevelopment to the extent that the MCAG has included those costs in itsestimated cost of constructing the regional system.

(b) The fee required by this chapter shall be supplementary to any fees andconditions imposed upon projects under the provisions of the Subdivision MapAct, California Environmental Quality Act, and other State and local laws,ordinances, or administrative policy which may authorize the imposition ofconditions or contributions on development and the applicant shall not be entitledto any credits for such contributions or conditions.

(c) The in-Iieu-of-fee credit for any land dedications shall be based on the fair marketvalue of the land dedicated as determined by an appraisal process withconsultation with MCAG.

(d) Should the in-Iieu-of-fee credit exceed the applicant's total fee, the differencemay be credited against any of the applicant's future development which wouldbe subject to the fee, or a reimbursement agreement may be entered into.

(e) Should a developer be required to provide improvements which benefit adjacentundeveloped land, the developer may be reimbursed for a proportionate share ofthe cost of such improvements under special agreements with MCAG andcontingent upon future fees contributed from other benefited developments. In allcases, however, reimbursements under such special agreements must be timedto coincide with construction of the transportation project as scheduled in theCapital Improvement Plan adopted by MCAG.

Sec. 3-18.10 Collection of fee.

The RTIF shall be collected at the time when the City grants an occupancy permit forresidential structures or at the time of the issuance of a building permit fornonresidential structures.

For a change of use or other development subject to this chapter, that would notrequire a building permit, the fee shall be collected at the time of the issuance of ause, development, or business license permit, whichever occurs first

6

Sec. 3-18.11 Regional transportation impact fee fund.

(a) All monies collected from payments of the regional transportation impact fee shallbe deposited with the County Treasurer of Merced County in the trust fund.

(b) All monies in the trust fund shall be used solely for the delivery of the regionaltransportation projects identified in this chapter. Project delivery includespreparation of environmental and engineering documents, right-of-wayacquisition, construction, project support, and fund administration. All interest orother earnings of the trust fund shall be credited to the trust fund.

Sec. 3-18.12 Appeal process.

An applicant who disputes the amount of impact fee may file a written notice ofappeal with the City Manager or their designee. Within fifteen (15) days of theappeal, the City Manager or their designee shall provide written notification of his/herdecision. If unsatisfied with the decision of the City Manager or their designee, theapplicant may resubmit a written appeal to the City Council. Thereafter, the CityCouncil shall render its decision by a majority vote of those members present withinsixty (60) days of the filing of the appeal.

Sec. 3-18.13 Annual fee and program review.

(a) The City Council shall annually review, pursuant to Government Code Section66006, and if necessary amend the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Programto ensure that it continues to be a fair and equitable method to distribute thecosts of improvements necessary to accommodate traffic volumes generated byfuture growth. This review will coincide with the adoption of the five (5)-yearCapital Improvement Program pursuant to Government Code section 66006(d).In adjusting the fee program, the following shall be considered:

(1) Adding new transportation projects that meet program criteria;

(2) Deleting projects that have been completed;

(3) Adjust the average per trip cost to reflect changes in constructioncosts;

(4) Adjust the average per-trip cost to reflect changes in land values asindicated in an annual survey of local government costs for landsubject to right-of-way acquisition;

(5) Revise the average per-trip cost to reflect changes in the list ofregional projects as that list may be amended from time to time by theRTIF Policy Board.

(b) Unless otherwise amended by the City Council, the fees listed in Section 3­18.06(d) of this chapter shall be adjusted on July 1 of each year based upon theEngineering Construction Cost Index as published by the Engineering NewsRecord.

(c) Changes in the regional transportation impact fee resulting from the annualreview will have no effect on fees already paid into the trust fund.

(d) At the time of the annual review, the City Council shall make findings for any feesremaining unexpended and uncommitted in the trust fund for five (5) or moreyears after deposit demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the fee andthe purpose for which it was charged. Unless a need for such fees can bedemonstrated, the unexpended or uncommitted portion including interest that hasaccrued, shall be refunded to the current record owner of the developmentproject on a prorated basis.

Sec. 3-18.14 Severability.

7

If anyone or more of the terms, provisions, or sections of this chapter shall to anyextent be adjudged invalid, unenforceable, or void, by a court of competentjurisdiction, each and all of the remaining terms, provisions, and sections of thischapter shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable.

Sec. 3-18.15 Effective date.

The ordinance codified in this chapter shall go into effect and be in full force andoperation thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. The City Clerk shallcertify to the adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter and cause the sameto be posted and published once within fifteen (15) days after passage and adoptionas may be required by law; or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to bepublished a summary of this chapter and a certified copy of the text of this chaptershall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five (5) days prior to the date ofadoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter; and, within fifteen (15) days afteradoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summaryand shall post a certified copy of this chapter, together with the vote for and againstthe same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the Los BanosCity Council on the 1sl day of April 2009, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the LosBanos City Council on the 15th day of April 2009 by the following vote:

AYES:NOES:ABSENT:

ATTEST:

Council Members Sousa, Stone, Mayor JonesCouncil Member VillaItaCouncil Member Faria

APPROVED:

£~~~Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk

8

Exhibit A • List of Projects on the Regional System

The following transportation projects are those which when completed will togethermitigate the traffic impacts on the regional transportation system of future growth tothe year 2030 throughout Merced County. The City Council, upon adoption of thischapter, shall amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan to include theseregional projects and any amendments.

The Regional Transportation Impact Fee shall be solely for funding environmentalclearance analysis and reports, design engineering, right-of-way acquisition,construction, fund management, project support, and other necessary expenses forthe delivery of Regional System projects and any other purpose consistent with thischapter. The Fee may not be used for system maintenance.

RTIF PROJECT LIST

A Bellevue Rd - connection to 99 - from new interchanQe to AtwaterB Mission Ave. - improvement - from 59 to 99 (not addinQ lanes)C SR 59 "Atwater-Merced Highway" realign from SR 99 to Bellevue Road w/ new SR 99

interchanQeD SR 59 - widen to 4 lanes - from Mission Ave. to Childs Ave.E SR 59 - widen to 4 lanes - from 152 to Mission Ave.F SR 140 "Bradley Overhead" - widen to 4/5 lanes - from Parsons to Santa Fe Ave.G SR 140 - widen to 4/5 lanes - from Santa Fe Ave. to Campus ParkwavH SR 140/33 "Gustine Truck Route" - bypass GustineI SR 152 "Los Banos Bypass"J SR 165 - widen to 4/5 lanes - from Hilmar to Stanislaus County or alternate project to

reduce traffic on SR 165 throuQh HilmarK Dos Palos road improvementsL Winton Parkway interchange improvements and wideninaM Campus Parkway from SR99 to Yosemite Ave.

9

ITEM 16e

MEMORANDUM

DATE:

TO:

FROM:

RE:

SEPTEMBER 8, 2011

MCAG GOVERNING BOARD

JUDI PERRY, ACCOUNTANT

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR2010/11 - 4TH QUARTER

BACKGROUND

The Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) program collects one-time fees from newdevelopment to mitigate their impact on the regional road network.

Effective August 1, 2005, the cities of Atwater, Dos Palos, Los Banos, Merced and the County ofMerced began collecting RTIF fees through their permitting process. The City of Gustine begancollecting the fee effective August 22, 2005. The City of Livingston has not adopted an ordinanceor resolution to implement the RTIF program fee collection.

MCAG Governing Board and member jurisdictions are updated on the status of the fee collectionand the proposed transportation projects through staff report updates.

DISCUSSION

Attached please find:

1. Table one (l) showing fees collected for the current fiscal year by jurisdiction.2. Table two (2) showing fees collected to-date by jurisdiction.3. Table three (3) showing fees collected by project and total expenditures to date.

REQUESTED ACTION

For information only.

Attachments: Tables 1,2 and 3

TABLE 1REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES (RTlF)

COLLECTED BY JURISDICTION FOR FY 2010·2011

JURISDICTION 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR TOTAL

Atwater 0.00 54,63454 1,268.89 3,728.98 59,632.41Dos Palos 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00Gustine 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Livingston 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Los Banos 28,307.00 0.00 6,569.82 23,43208 58,308.90Merced City 17,883.76 7,253.02 70,886.93 4,113.52 100,137.23Merced County 66,068.53 78,993.27 28,683.18 88,809.24 262,554.22Interest Earnings 845.10 18,104.75 782.24 23,50553 43,237.62Total 113,104.39 158,985.58 108,191.06 143,589.35 523,870.38

TABLE 2REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES (RTIF)

COLLECTED BY JURISDICTION TO-DATE JUNE 30, 2011'

JURISDICTION FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 TOTALAtwater 16,748.00 24,337.58 47,186.97 0.00 0.00 59,632.41 147,904.96Dos Palos 31,625.00 57,080.00 17,707.00 3,115.00 0.00 000 109,527.00Gustine 18,711.00 46,443.19 8,510.00 66,076.96 0.00 000 139,741.15Livingston 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Los Banos 69,534.00 601,678.57 433,153.29 355,488.97 182,434 83 58,308.90 1,700,598.56Merced City 1,355,575.39 1,125,031.96 738,658.15 294,548.85 145,025.94 100,13723 3,758,977.52Merced County 973,25120 446,820.36 319,704.41 474,212.31 116,274.21 262,554.22 2,592,816.71Interest Earnings 32,060.00 141,768.17 155,912.48 114,747.50 62,057.04 43,237.62 549,782.81Total 2,497,504.59 2,443,159.83 1,720,832.30 1,308,189.59 505,792.02 523,870.38 8,999,348.71, Actual deposit amounts without refund deductions

TABLE 3FEES COLLECTED BY PROJECT (Thru 03/31/11)

FY 2005-2006 FY 2006-2007 FY 2007-2008 FY 2008-2009 FY 2009-2010 FY 2010-2011~ro.iect Name Total to Date Total Total (Net) ** Total (Net) ** Total (Net) ** Total (Net) ** Total (Net) **Denosit Amount: $8,328,943.09 $2,465,444.65 $2,288,772.38 $1,528,02777 $1,122,330.55 $443,73498 $480,632.76Allocations:Bellevue - Connect 99 $75,68306 $24,16496 $17,236.10 $19,448.97 $3,577.94 $1,044 16 $10,21093MIssion - 59 to 99 $39,99049 $12,696.36 $9,820.89 $6,51488 $5,65667 $2,52852 $2,77317AtwaterfMerced Expressway $2,484,201.59 $904,904.17 $678,93954 $465,80967 $210,66253 $84,581 18 $139,304.5059 - MISSIOn to Childs $399,460.87 $149,738.12 $130,15897 $85,90244 $18,049.74 $8,261.65 $7,3499559 - 152 to MissIOn $242,570.09 $82,73592 $81,83609 $52,75793 $14,009.55 $6,18540 $5,04520140 Bradley Overhead $780,319.00 $314,179 15 $244,969.54 $162,24684 $30,707.77 $13,613 51 $14,602.19140 - To Campus Parkway $431,80318 $173,811 99 $135,64698 $89,832.11 $16,94085 $7,514.85 $8,056.40140/33 Truck Route $250,30556 $84,23843 $69,503.24 $26,231.61 $56,18804 $4,723.43 $9,42081152 Los Banos Bvpass $2,590,337.06 $580,63001 $707,06537 $471,507.13 $477,22009 $187,213 27 $166,701.19165 - North of Hilmar $602,594.33 $113,691 09 $189,98285 $132,275.48 $97,10030 $41,23428 $28,310.33DP Road Improv $12,940.62 $000 $000 $000 $7,44752 $2,10049 $3,39261Wmton Parkway Interchange $32,212.15 $000 $000 $0.00 $14,57678 $5,788.27 $11,847 10Campus Parkway 99 - Yosemi $302,29012 $000 $000 $0.00 $158,96946 $74,508.62 $68,81204AdmimstratIon $84,23497 $24,654.45 $23,612.81 $15,500.71 $11,22331 $4,437.35 $4,80634

TOTAL all allocations $8,328,943 09 $2,465,444.65 $2,288,772 38 $1,528,02777 $1,122,33055 $443,73498 $480,632761st Qtr Interest Income $97,50584 $23018 $25,10349 $32,258.46 $28,28798 $10,78063 $845.102nd Qtr Interest Income $158,49479 $3,453.78 $34,42233 $45,691.52 $39,159.61 $17,66280 $18,104753rd Qtr Interest Income $148,565.07 $10,430.96 $45,215.18 $46,28414 $31,605.12 $14,24743 $782244th Qtr Interest Income $145,21705 $17,945.02 $37,02717 $31,67836 $15,69479 $19,36618 $23,50553TOTAL Interest $549,78275 $32,059.94 $141,768.17 $155,91248 $114,747.50 $62,057.04 $43,23762TOTAL $8,878,725.84 $2,497,504.59 $2,430,540.55 $1,683,940.25 $1,237,078.05 $505,792.02 $523,870.38

•• Net equals total deposits less refunds

Atwater Merced Expressway Project Expenditures though 06/3012011 $5,000,132.04

LOS BanosAt the Crossroads of California

TO:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT: Consideration of Appointment to the Implementation Team for the 10-YearPlan to End Homeless

TYPE OF REPORT:

Recommendation:

Agenda Item

That the City Council appoint a City Council Member to serve with the Planning Directoron behalf of the City of Los Banos on the Implementation Team for the 10-Year Plan toEnd Homeless.

Discussion:

Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG) is asking local jurisdictions toappoint representatives to be a part of the Implementation Team for the 10-Year Plan toEnd Homelessness. The Team will meet quarterly, assign achievement benchmarksand review overall progress on the 10-Year Plan.

SR/lm

LOS Banos

TO:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

TYPE OF REPORT:

Agenda Staff Report

Mayor & City Council Members

Rick Spalding, IT ManagerI1>fSeptember 21 J 2011

Review of IT Department Projects and Tasks

Informational Item

Recommendation:Staff has prepared this informational item for council review and to receive comments.There is no council action regarding this informational item.

Background:This report provides the public and the City Council with update information regardingprojects and tasks that the IT Department has accomplished thus far in 2011, as well ascurrent and future projects.

Attachments:Handouts of "Review of IT Department Projects and Tasks - September 21, 2011"presentation

Review of IT DepartmentProjects and Tasks

September 21, 2011

Rick Spalding

IT Director

Agenda ...

• Review projects completed so far in 2011(calendar year)

• Review current projects

• Future plans

9/12/2011

1

Completed Project: Field-based Reporting• Would allow officers to create reports from

mobile data computers

• Would allow reports to route through automatedworkflow for approval

• Project ultimately abandoned- Hundreds of hours spent by IT and PO staff getting the

application to work

- Problems with software caused delays in processingreports

- Officers did not save time typing reports on MOe'sdue to the inefficiency or malfunctions with theprocess and general slowness of the MOe/s

- Software company refunded license costs

Completed Project: ServerVirtualization for Police Department

Areas of concern:

• Criticality of several PO applications

• Several servers were Ifstand-alone1J- if the

server failed} the application would go out ofservice

• Expandability/scalability for new applications

• Expandability/scalability of data for existingapplications

9/12/2011

2

9/12/2011

Non-Virtualized PO VisionAir application and server configuration

RMS ServerCAD Server • Houses current and FBR Server• Internally redundant legacy records databases • RecenUy purchased• Files stored on server • Stand-alone server • Stand-alone server• Files routinely backed up. Files stored on server • Files stored on server• Vendor maintenance • Data Files routinely • Data files routIOely

costs backed up backed up

Mobile Server• Stand-alone

server• Files stored

on server

Several otherservers exist atPollee Station

Desktop PC's on PO network (approx 60)• Access to CAD, RMS, FBR, Mobile

Server, other applications• Includes

• Dispatch workstallons• Staff computers at PO (Command

staff, support staff, shared computersfor officers, etc)

• Staff computers al Annex(Invesllgators, PAL, etc)

Mobile Data Computers inPolice vehicles (approx 16)• Access to FBR,

VlslonMob,le• Car-Ie-car, car-to­

dispatch commumcatlonsuSing MDCs

Virtualized PO VisionAir application and server configuration

Mobile Data Computers inPollee vchlcles (approx 16)• Access to FBR,

VIsionMobile• Car-la-car, car-to­

dispatch commumcatlonsuSIOg MDCs

Several otherservers exist atPolice Station

Virtual Server Environment currently hosts

• CAD server• RMS server• Mobile server• Printer server (used to be housed

elsewhere)• Domain controller (used to be housed

elsewhere)

Desktop PC's on PO network (approx 60)Access to CAD, RMS, FBR, MobileServer, other applicationsIncludes• Dispatch wOrKslatlons• Staff computers al PO (Command

staff, support staff, shared computersfor officers, etc)

• Staff computers at Annex(Investigators, PAL, etc)

3

Completed Project: ServerVirtualization for Police Department

Benefits of new server setup:• If one physical server fails, the other automatically goes

into operation.• Each physical server hosts several "virtual servers". Failure

of one virtual server does not affect the other virtualservers on the same physical server.

• Storage for the virtual server environment is on oneredundant device rather than distributed.

• The server purchased for FBR was re-used as one of thephysical servers in the virtual server environment.

• Other applications will be migrated from physical servers tothe virtual server environment over time.

• Savings in power (fewer servers, less air conditioning) andspace to house equipment

Completed Project: Upgrades toCritical Applications for PD

• Applications upgraded prior to migration tothe virtualized server environment

• Added new functionality to -- and resolvedlong-standing issues with -- CAD} RMS} andMobile applications

9/12/2011

4

Completed Project: Public Safety RadioReplacement (support role)

• Replaced ""20-year old radio system for PD

• Replaced radio system for Fire that wasn'tdesigned for public safety use

• New radio system complies with radiomandates from federal government

• New radio system utilizes digital networkinfrastructure. Site-to-site connectivity isavailable for other applications.

• Radio equipment can be remotely accessed toaid in resolving problems.

Completed Project: MDC (singlelaptop) deployment

• Existing MDe's are at the end of theiranticipated service life

• Installed one laptop computer in a patrol carto test functionality

- Test existing applications

- Functionality issues (batterYI powerl ability for anofficer to work on the laptop out of the vehicle)

9/12/2011

5

Current Project: Exchange Deploymentfor email and collaboration

• Current email system is "decentralized"} andwide-scale collaboration is not feasible

• Goals:- Sharing of calendars, contact lists amongst staff

- Better access to email, calendar, contacts overremote-access devices for managementemployees

- Centrally manage storage of email• Current email environment stores all email to desktop

computer hard drives

• No process currently in place to manage old email

Cu rrent Project: Copier LeaseConsolidation

• Currently} City departments use 10 copiersfrom three different vendors

• Goals:- Reduce costs based on the volume of services and

equipment from one vendor

- Improve service based on the number of devicesin use from same vendor

- Utilize newer technology if available and practical

9/12/2011

6

Current Project: Review of ITdocumentation

• Goals:- Ensure the application "ownersll and IT agree on

su pport expectations

- Document routine tasks to be performed toensure the reliability of equipment andapplications

- Identify the age of equipment, determineanticipated lifespan, and recommend replacementcycle

Future Project: Mobile Data Computerreplacement

• Existing M DC equipment is at the end of life,unable to support additional applications

• Goals:- Deploy new equipment that provides faster and

more efficient use

- Working with Police Department, ensure thechosen alternative provides optimal support fortheir operation

- Research applications or services that are not inuse today that can be supported by newequipment

9/12/2011

7

Upcoming: Presentation to MunicipalInformation Systems organization

• Discuss solutions IT provided that reducedcosts for the City. Some areas that arehighlighted:

- Re-purpose, re-use, re-deploy existing equipmentto maximize functionality and reduce costs

- Look for alternatives to existing services with alow initial investment and a lower recurring costthan the existing service

- Examine staffing models to make sure that thecorrect employee is doing the job, reducing costs

9/12/2011

8

£

PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Date: September 16, 2011

Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing

Proposal: Los Banos Zoning Ordinance

Tn

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held by the Los BanosPlanning Commission to consider a recommendation to the Los Banos City Council tomake minor revisions to the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance amending Title 9,Chapter 3 of the Los Banos Municipal Code.

A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of thePlanning Commission on Wednesday, September 28, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the CouncilChambers of Los Banos City Hall located at 520 "J" Street. Questions regarding theabove-referenced item may be directed to Paula Fitzgerald, AICP, Planning Director atCity Hall or at (209) 827-7000, Ext.114.

Persons wishing to provide oral comments on the described proposal may do so at thismeeting or may provide written comments on this matter prior to the public meeting.Written comments may be sent by U.S. Mail or hand delievered to the City of Los BanosCity Hall at 520 "J" Street, Los Banos, California 93635. If no comments are receivedprior to or on the above date, it will be assumed that no comments are being offered.The public is also informed that should this matter, at some future date go to court, courttestimony is limited to only those issues raised at the hearings per Government CodeSection 65009.

THE CITY OF LOS BANOS

Stacy Souza ElmsAssistant Planner