Upload
jerold
View
32
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Looking Beyond the Words. Analyzing Impact Of The Companies Act, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions. February, 2013. Cross-Border M&A. 1. Merger Of Indian Company With Foreign Company. F Co. F Co. Foreign and Indian shareholders. Foreign Shareholders. Merger of I Co. with F Co. Overseas. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Looking Beyond the Words
Analyzing Impact Of The Companies Act, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
February, 2013
Cross-Border M&A
1
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 3Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Merger Of Indian Company With Foreign Company
F Co.
I Co.
Overseas
India
F Co.
Business of Indian Co
Overseas
India
Indian Shareholders
Merger of I Co. with F Co.
What the New Act Says… What the Old Act Says…
Merger of Indian company with a foreign company specifically allowed under the provisions of the New Companies Act subject to conditions:
Allowed only in specified overseas jurisdictions. (No notification from the MCA on specified overseas jurisdiction)
Merger subject to approval from RBI
GDR, cash or a combination of both could be used for discharge of consideration
It was specifically provided that in relation to a transaction of merger / amalgamation, the transferee company should be a company registered under the Companies Act
Thus, merger of an Indian company with foreign company was specifically prohibited
Foreign Shareholders
Foreign and Indian
shareholders
Business of Indian Co to continue as
branch of foreign Co
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 4Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Merger Of Indian Company With Foreign Company (Cont…)
Taxability of assets transferred by Indian company to Foreign Co – Exemption under Section 47 (vi) of the Income Tax Act, available only if the merged company is Indian company – Availing of exemption difficult
Taxability of shares transferred by Indian shareholder in lieu of GDR / cash of Foreign Co- Exemption under Section 47 (vii) of the Income Tax Act, available only if the merged company is Indian company – Availing of exemption difficult
Post merger, the Indian business would be considered as branch / permanent establishment of the Foreign Company
Tax rate applicable to profits of foreign Company would be 43.26% as against 33.99% for domestic companies
Income of the branch to be determined in accordance with the principles of Article 7 of the relevant DTAA i.e. profits attributable to the Branch
Relatively easy to repatriate profits from the branch to the parent
Tax
Considerations
Implications of foreign mergers
Substantive compliance requirements for Indian companies under Companies Act, would not be applicable
Post merger the Branch, would be considered as a foreign company and provisions of Section 592 to 602 of Companies Act would be applicable
Compliance with RBI regulations, as applicable to Branch applicable
Regulatory
considerations
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 5Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Cross-border M&A – Issues For Consideration
Overseas acquisitions by Indian companies generally through Special Purpose Vehicles(“SPV’s”) incorporated outside
India
Section 185 of New Act prohibits any loan/guarantee to subsidiaries ( whose board could be de-facto said to be
controlled or accustomed to act on behalf of holding company)
Circular dated 13 February 2014, allows provision of guarantees/ securities by holding to subsidiaries, only till section 186
(relating to loans and investment by company) of the New Act is notified
The case study below presumes the position after notification of section 186
Background
I Co.
Subsidiary
India
Overseas
TargetOverseas Bank
Situation under Old Act
Funding(100
MUSD)
Purchase of shares of target for 100 MUSD
Position under New ActI Co.
India
Overseas
Subsidiary
Target
100% shares of Subsidiary (20 MUSD)
100% shares of Subsidiary (100 MUSD)
• Entire acquisition to be funded by I Co through self funds. • Leveraged buyouts likely to be affected
Guarantee
Purchase of shares of target for 100 MUSD
Equity fund – 20Loan funds - 80
Equity fund – 100
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 6Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Domestic Acquisition By Foreign Company
Division A
New Co.
In various cases, inbound M&A deals have been
structured through ‘Subsidiarization’
The subsidiary structure also enabled ease of
entry of foreign investor in a new entity, with
desired business
Structure feasible under the Old Act as section
372A / 295 of the old Act, allowed loans between
holding-subsidiary
Section 185 of the New Act, prohibits loan / book
debts to a subsidiary by a holding Company (no
exemptions). Also Section 186, as proposed, does
not contain exemption for loans provided to a
100% subsidiary
This means entire consideration of Slump sale,
should be discharged in cash on Day 1 – Thereby
making structuring of such M&A deal structures
difficult
Background and Implications
Step ISlump sale of Division B to 100% subsidiary of Co. X for a definite consideration
Consideration to reflect as payable in books of New Co.
Division B
Divesting Co. X
Foreign Investor
India
Overseas
Step IIInvestment at an agreed valuation in New Co.
Step IIIInvestment proceeds to be used by New Co. to discharge its liability to Co.X for slump sale consideration
Acquisition structure under old Act
M&A provisions for Small Companies/ Holding-subsidiary
2
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 8Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
What's In The Bucket For Small Companies/Holding-Subsidiary ?
The New Act, recognizing the need for flexibility, has provided fast track route for merger of small
companies / holding or subsidiary companies
Merger between small companies; or
Merger between holding company and its 100% subsidiary; or
Merger between other class or classes of companies as may be prescribed
Fast track
mergers
Small Company (under the New Act)
Company other than a public company
Paid up capital does not exceed 50 lakh rupees or the amount prescribed (not more than INR 5
crore)
Turnover as per last profit and loss – Less than INR 2 crore or the amount prescribed (not more than
INR 20 crore)
Cannot be a holding / subsidiary company
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 9Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Fast Track Merger Scheme – Small Companies/ Holding-Subsidiaries
Notice of the Scheme to Registrar, OL of both the Transferee/Transferor Companies
Conduct general meetings of both the Transferee/Transferor Companies – Approval by shareholders having 90% of the total share capital
Transferee/Transferor Companies to file declaration of solvency with their respective Registrars
Transferee/Transferor Companies to gain approval of their respective creditors representing 90% of the total value of creditors. (21 days notice for obtaining approval in writing)
Transferee Company to file copy of scheme with the Central Government, Registrar and OL
If no objection, CG to register the Scheme
Objection by Registrar, OL, to be filed with CG within 30 days else deemed ‘no objection’
CG to decide to approve scheme or file objections with Tribunal (time limit to CG for raising objections is within 60 days of receipt of the Scheme), else deemed ‘no objection’
Tribunal, upon receipt of objections from the CG, shall pass order approving the scheme, otherwise normal procedure laid down under section 230 to be complied with
Issues (i) Whether Demerger covered under the provisions of section 233(ii) Can small companies/ holding-subsidiaries apply for normal course under a scheme of arrangement ?
Notice of the Scheme Convening GM
Creditors approvalDeclaration of solvency
Filing of Scheme with the CG
1 2
4
3
5
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 10Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Fast Track Merger Scheme – Small Companies/ Holding-Subsidiaries
Whether the Fast track merger scheme applicable for
Demerger of small/holding-subsidiaries ?
Can small companies/ holding-subsidiaries apply for normal route under a scheme of arrangement ?
Specifically provided that provision of Section 233 shall apply
mutatis mutandis to other types of Schemes referred in Section
230 or 232 (i.e. demerger, spin offs etc)
Thus, Demerger of small companies can be undertaken using the
Fast track process
Specific provision under section 233 allows a small
company/holding-subsidiary to apply for normal route for
merger / demerger
Issue for consideration : Whether merger of a small company with a foreign company permissible under the fast track merger
process?
Other Important Aspects
3
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 12Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Merger Of Listed Company With Unlisted Company
Shareholders of Co. A
Co. A (Listed)
Overseas
India
Shareholders of Co. A & Co. B
Merged C o. (A+B)
(Unlisted)
Overseas
India
Co. B (Unlisted)
Shareholders of Co. B
Co. A to merge with Co. B
Shareholder of the transferor company have an option to exit at a fair price if the merged entity remains unlisted, by payment of cash consideration
What the New Act Says… What the Old Act Says…
The New Act specifically provides that on merger of a listed company into an unlisted company, the transferee company shall remain unlisted unless it goes through the process of a listing through a public offering.
An exit opportunity is also being provided to the shareholders of the merged listed company at a fair price
No specific provisions under the old Act. The listing of the merged entity was practically possible subject to compliance with the SEBI laws
Historically, in certain cases companies have remain unlisted post merger/ demerger transactions involving listed entities
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 13Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Other Important Aspects
Under old Act, 365 day time gap was required between board approved buybacks (i.e. buy-backs upto 10%)
Under new Act, buyback possible after 3 years from which specified defaults (repayment of deposits / interest etc,) ceased to subsist
Minimum 1 year gap required between two buybacks (whether shareholder approved or board approved), even if buyback is within 25% limit.
Buy-Back
Implications of buy-back, issue of differential voting rights etc
Permits issue of shares with differential voting and dividend rights subject to restrictions / rules – Section 43
No exemption / relaxation to private limited companies, which was available earlier
Onerous conditions laid in Rules for issue of DVR shares, which inter-alia includes authorization in AOA and special resolution, track record of at least 10% dividend payout during past 3 financial years, no default in repayment of Investor or creditors dues and that the company has not been convicted of offence under RBI Act, SEBI Act, SCRA or other Special Acts
Differential
Voting Rights
(“DVR”)
Under new Act, investment not permitted through more than two layers of ‘Investment Companies’ – Section 186. This Restriction shall not apply to:
Company acquiring another company incorporated overseas having more than two layers, as per laws of that country
Subsidiary having investment subsidiaries for meeting any statutory requirements
Layered
structures
Prohibition on companies from holding shares through trusts, either on its behalf or on behalf of any subsidiaries/ associate companies on corporate restructuring / compromise / arrangement - Section 232
Treasury Stock
All
right
s re
serv
ed
| 14Impact Of CA, 2013 on Mergers & Acquisitions
Other Important Aspects (cont..)
Earlier Act provided for flexibility in the manner of recording the transaction of merger / demergers – thereby facilitating financial restructuring (set off of losses etc)
Specific provision in new law stipulates that the accounting must conform and comply with the accounting standards. (presently compliance with accounting standards is only mandatory for listed companies)
The new provision in the Companies Act, 2013 would even require an unlisted company to comply with the accounting standard norms
The auditor’s certificate stating that the scheme has been drawn in compliance with Accounting standards is now mandatory for all companies.
Scheme Accounting
Implications on Scheme Accounting, Objections, Notice etc
Under old Act, objections to scheme could be raised by any shareholder / creditor, without any threshold limit
Under New Act, objections can be raised only by persons holding not less than 10% of the shareholding or having outstanding debt amounting to not less than 5% of the total outstanding debt.
This has been done to prevent shareholders with very nominal shares to delay the procedures.
Objections to Scheme
Under old Act, the notice of scheme would be served to the Central Government, the Registrar of Companies and the Official Liquidator as per the directions of the High Court.
Under New Act, the notice of the scheme of the arrangement must be notified to all the regulatory authorities concerned like SEBI, Income Tax Department, RBI, Competition Commission of India (CCI), stock exchanges(as applicable) in addition to the provision of the Companies Act, 2013, NCLT, shareholders, creditors, etc.
Impact : Increased scrutiny of schemes by regulatory authorities.
Notice of
Scheme
NEW DELHISuite 4A, Plaza M 6, Jasola, New Delhi 110025‐ ‐ ‐
Tel: +91 (11) 4737 1000, Fax: +91 (11) 4737 1010, Email: [email protected]
MUMBAIThe Summit Level 2, Unit No. 210, Western Express Highway, Ville Parle (East), Mumbai – 400 001
T: +91 (22) 6455 9696, F: +91 (22) 2617 4676, Email: [email protected]
DEHRADUN75/7 Rajpur Road, Dehradun – 248001, Uttarakhand
Tel: +91(135) 2742026, Fax: +91(135) 2740186, Email: [email protected]
SINGAPORENangia & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd., 24 Raffles Place, #25-04A Clifford Centre, Singapore 048621