18
Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Local Government Case Study –

Fairfax County

Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEMFairfax County GovernmentFacilities Management Department (FMD)

July 11, 2008

Page 2: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Facilities Management Department

• Facilities Management Department (FMD) is responsible for managing 170+ facilities

• Operate and maintain 8 million gross SF• Pay utilities for 6 million gross SF

Note: This does not include facilities operated by Parks, Schools, Housing or Public Works

FMD also manages annual utility costs of approximately $10 million (and rising!)

Energy Goal was established in FY2001 – to reduce energy consumption and energy costs

Page 3: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Where We Began

• Baseline usage established

• Installed Energy Management Control Systems (EMCS) in existing buildings

• Made EMCS standard for new buildings

• Review new building designs

• Cost management

• Picked “low hanging fruit” using ESCO

Page 4: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Completed Energy Projects

• Public Safety Complex Meter Totalization• Lighting retrofit in facilities

– T-12 lamps consume 40W each– T-8 lamps consume 32W each– Reduced 4 lamps to 3 per fixture for additional watts

reduction, overall light output remains the same

• Lighting and Variable Frequency Drive retrofit at the Government Center Complex

Page 5: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Government Center Complex Energy Project Results

calendar year energy cost energy usage (kBtu) $/kBtu2005 $1,618,417.53 103,615,608 $0.015622006 $1,625,827.53 98,381,255 $0.01653

Energy project use reduction 5.05%Energy project cost reduction -0.46%Cost avoidance in 2006 $ $86,501.80Cost avoidance in 2007 $ $90,554.31

$177,056.10Two Year Total Cost Avoidance

Page 6: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

ResultsTotal energy consumption

500,000,000

505,000,000

510,000,000

515,000,000

520,000,000

525,000,000

530,000,000

535,000,000

540,000,000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

kBtu

Page 7: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

ResultsConsumption/gross SF

9092949698

100102104106108110

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

kBtu/SF

Page 8: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Historical Electric Costs

$0.045

$0.050

$0.055

$0.060

$0.065

$0.070

$0.075

$0.080

$0.085

electric

Page 9: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Historical Gas costs

Flo

yd Is

ab

el

Katr

ina

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

natural gas

Page 10: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Results• Even when consumption decreases,

expenditures continue increasing

480,000,000

500,000,000

520,000,000

540,000,000

560,000,000

580,000,000

600,000,000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Est 2

008

Est 2

009

$0$2,000,000$4,000,000$6,000,000$8,000,000$10,000,000$12,000,000$14,000,000$16,000,000

kBtu $

Page 11: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Energy Benchmarking

$0.0

$0.5

$1.0

$1.5

$2.0

$2.5

$3.0

2005

Actual

2006

Actual

2007

Actual

2008

Estimate

2009

Estimate

109.0

110.0

111.0

112.0

113.0

114.0

115.0

116.0

117.0

118.0

119.0

Utility Cost/SF BOMA cost/SF kbtu/SF

Page 12: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

ResultsConsumption and cost savings per year

460,000,000

480,000,000

500,000,000

520,000,000

540,000,000

560,000,000

580,000,000

600,000,000

baseline

actual

Total cost avoidance since 2001 exceeds $4 million

Page 13: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Results

• FMD’s Goal was 10% kBtu/SF reduction over 10 years (average 1%/ year)

• Between FY01-FY07, total kBtu/SF was reduced by 11.1%, which is 1.85% average reduction per year.

Page 14: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Where we are now

• Budget constraints = no funds for energy projects

• Past Capital Renewal budget requests have made primarily based on maintenance needs.

• Budget constraints = less funds for Capital Renewal

New Capital Renewal budget request priorities =

High energy user + High maintenance

Page 15: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Capital Renewal Combined with Energy Saving Strategies

John Marshall Library HVAC renovation resulted in 28.8% energy consumption savings

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

AprM

ayJ un J ul

AugSep

Oct

Nov

DecJ an Feb M

ar

Before

After

Page 16: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

• The Ugly - Limited Resources means it will take longer to implement energy saving opportunities

»Money»Staffing»Time

• The Bad – no additional project resources for the next several years

• The Good - FY2009 budget establishes one full time staff position as Countywide Energy Coordinator

Page 17: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Where We Are Going

• Develop new reduction goals

• Prioritize projects to meet multiple needs and limited funding

• Other possibilities available– Evaluate renewable energy technologies– Demand side management– Work with code officials and engineers– Commissioning and Re-Commissioning

Page 18: Local Government Case Study – Fairfax County Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEM Fairfax County Government Facilities Management Department (FMD) July 11, 2008

Contact Information

Jennifer L. Gorter, PE, CEMFairfax County GovernmentFacilities Management Department

Projects, Engineering, & Energy

12000 Government Center Parkway

Suite 424

Fairfax, VA 22035

703-324-2808

[email protected]