43
5/24/2018 LNVvs.Gebhardt:IntervenorsMotionforJudicialNoticeJerryKerely-slidepdf.com http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lnv-vs-gebhardt-intervenors-motion-for-judicial-notice-jerrykerely 1/43 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE LNV CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 3:12-CV-468-TAV- ) CATHERINE GEBHARDT ) ) Defendant. ) INTERVENERS’ MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTIC CRIMINAL INDICTMENT AND CONVICTION BY JU JERRY D. KERLEY Comes Now the Interveners, representing themselves, pursuant to Rule 201 Judicial Adjudicative Facts hereby requests this Court take Judicial Notice of the documents herein and in support states as follows: 1. THE INTERVENERS move this Court to take judicial notice of: Superseding I ndictment of JERRY D. KERLEY, Un ited States of Ameri ca Whaley and Jerry D. Kerl ey, Case No. 3:10-cr-169 (E.D. Tenn.)  (attached “Exhibit A.) 

LNV vs. Gebhardt: Intervenors Motion for Judicial Notice JerryKerely

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LNV vs. Gebhardt, Case No: 3:12-CV-468-TAV-HBG; Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville. Other LNV victims file motions for intervention under federal rule 24 then file a motion for relief of judgement under federal rule 60(b)(4).

Citation preview

  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

    AT KNOXVILLE

    LNV CORPORATION, )

    )

    Plaintiff, )

    )

    v. ) No.: 3:12-CV-468-TAV-HBG

    )

    CATHERINE GEBHARDT )

    )

    Defendant. )

    INTERVENERS MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF CRIMINAL INDICTMENT AND CONVICTION BY JURY OF

    JERRY D. KERLEY

    Comes Now the Interveners, representing themselves, pursuant to Rule 201 Judicial Notice of

    Adjudicative Facts hereby requests this Court take Judicial Notice of the documents described

    herein and in support states as follows:

    1. THE INTERVENERS move this Court to take judicial notice of:

    Superseding Indictment of JERRY D. KERLEY, United States of America v. Jeffrey

    Whaley and Jerry D. Kerley, Case No. 3:10-cr-169 (E.D. Tenn.) (attached hereto as

    Exhibit A.)

    Judgment in the Criminal Case of JERRY D. KERLEY, United States of America v.

    Jeffrey Whaley and Jerry D. Kerley, Case No. 3:10-cr-169 (E.D. Tenn.) (attached

    hereto as Exhibit B.)

  • 2. Under Federal Rule of Evidence 201 the court may judicially notice a fact that is not

    subject to reasonable dispute because it: (1) is generally known within the trial courts

    territorial jurisdiction; or (2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources

    whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. The Court may take judicial notice of

    records of any court of record of the United States.

    3. On June 6, 2013, Jerry D. Kerley, the owner of Guaranty Land Title Company located at

    204 Parkway, Sevierville, Tennessee, was found guilty by a jury of his peers and

    convicted in favor of the United States for the following crimes:

    Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud

    Wire Fraud Affecting a Financial Institution

    Bank Fraud

    False Statements to a Financial Institution

    Money Laundering

    4. THE INTERVENERS moves this Court to take Judicial Notice of Kerleys indictment

    and conviction because these documents confirm that Kerely engaged in a fraud scheme

    involving mortgage transactions. GEBHARDT contends in her pleadings that the deed of

    trust and the adjustable note rider filed with the Sevier County recorder are not the same

    documents she signed at the closing of her mortgage. Kerely, on behalf of his company,

    Guaranty Land Title Company prepared the GEBHARDT loan origination documents.

    Kerely was present at the closing of the loan and did not sign any document as a notary

    because a notary was present who notarized them yet the documents filed with the Sevier

  • County recorder are notarized by Kerely. These documents filed with the Sevier County

    recorder are not initialed by GEBHARDT whereas she had initialed each page of the

    documents she signed at closing. When GEBHARDT personally obtained her origination

    documents from Guaranty Land Title Company because her then attorney Doug Taylor

    refused to do so she discovered a loan application with her signature that she had never

    filled out. The information on this loan application was untrue and gives GEBHARDT

    genuine cause for concern about how many such loan applications falsified by Kerley

    were used and how. A title search uncovered a hidden and highly suspicious assignment

    that further clouds the chain of title. Several suspicious deeds of trust and other land

    records filed prior to GEBHARDTs purchase of the property may implicate the seller,

    Ron Sullivan, as a participant of a fraud scheme devised and executed by Kerley and his

    known accomplices or other accomplices, yet unknown.

    5. Kerely was convicted of crimes he committed from about August 30, 2005 to about

    March 9, 2006. His conviction of these specific crimes shows he has the capacity and

    propensity for committing such crimes; and that he was caught committing them during

    this time frame which in no way excludes the possibility that he committed similar crimes

    using similar means and methods earlier than 2005.

    GEBHARDT also contends in her pleadings that she discovered through an audit of her

    origination documents prepared by a Certified Professional Accountant that the broker

    Joyce Linger and Kerley tacked an additional amount into the loan above the purchase

    price of the home that was not an amount she intended to borrow; based on the crimes

    and the manner and means identified in Kerelys criminal indictment used to commit his

  • crimes it is highly probably that Kerley and/or Linger kept this money after the loan

    funded.

    6. By way of background, Kerley was convicted of wire fraud, and of knowingly and

    willfully participating in a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money by means

    of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and omissions and that for

    purposes of executing such scheme and artifice he transferred by wire in interstate

    commerce, writings, signs and signals in violation of Title 18, USC 1343, thereby

    affecting a financial institution AND he used materially false and fraudulent pretenses,

    representations and omissions to fund and disburse mortgage loans.

    7. Kerley conspired with others in the commission of his crimes. Kerely and those he

    conspired with used materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and

    omissions to fund and disburse mortgage loans for other borrowers (straw borrowers)

    to purchase real properties and to obtain, for the personal benefit of the co-conspirators, a

    portion of the money loaned and disbursed to fund the straw borrowers purchases of

    the real properties. Kerley and his co-conspirators also conspired that some fraudulent

    real estate transactions involved straw, or nominee sellers and they orchestrated

    fraudulent transactions known as property flips where the property would be resold at a

    substantially higher price to an unsuspecting straw buyer.

    8. A review of the land records and loan origination documents shows it is highly probable

    that Ron Sullivan was either knowingly or unknowingly a straw seller and that

    GEBHARDT was unknowingly used by Kerley and Linger as a straw buyer and as

    such she was deceived as to the risks, duties, or obligations incurred.

  • 9. The documents attached hereto as Exhibits A and B may be accessed online from

    PACER under United States of America v. Jeffrey Whaley and Jerry D. Kerley, Case No.

    3:10-cr-169 (E.D. Tenn.).

    10. Timely written notice of this request is hereby given by email and postal mail service

    upon Plaintiffs counsel as required by law.

    WHEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 THE INTERVENERS move

    this Court take Judicial Notice of the Information and Conviction of Jerry Kerely and

    unknown co-conspirators, United States of America v. Jeffrey Whaley and Jerry D.

    Kerley, Case No. 3:10-cr-169 (E.D. Tenn.) without hearing, and for such other and

    further relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.

    RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on this _____ day of May, 2014

    THE INTERVENERS

    __________________________________________________________________

    DENISE SUBRAMANIAM as Representative for THE INTERVENERS

  • CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    The undersigned hereby certifies that the copy of the foregoing motion of the Interveners

    has been forwarded by regular U.S. Mail upon the following:

    Ronald G. Steen Jr. and

    Kevin P. Hartley

    STITES & HARBISON, PLLC

    Sun Trust Plaza

    401 Commerce Street

    Suite 800

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37219

    SUBMITTED on this _____ day of May, 2014

    __________________________________________________________________

    DENISE SUBRAMANIAM as Representative for THE INTERVENERS