Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2008 CONFIDENTIAL
Prepared for
LNG Shipping Market, Financing and Flagging
Marine Money Cyprus Forum
April 2017
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 1
Poten & Partners (UK) Ltd. 101 Wigmore Street
London W1U 1QU
UK
Prepared for Marine Money Cyprus Forum
LNG Shipping Market, Financing and Flagging
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 2
Agenda
• LNG Shipping Market
• LNG Shipowners
• LNG Ship Financing
• Ship Flag
• Conclusion
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 3
LNG Shipping Market
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 4
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Num
ber
of S
hips
On Order
Operat ionalFleet
Lay-Up/ SemiLay-Up/ UnderConversion
Scrapped
The LNG fleet is set to reach 500 ships by 2018
*excludes floating liquefaction and small-scale ships
LNG Fleet Growth*
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 5
LNG Shipowners
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 6
There is a large pool of LNG shipowners
Shipowners by LNG Fleet Size (10+ ships, incl. orderbook)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MO
L
NYK
Nak
ilat
K-Li
ne
Teek
ay L
NG
Par
tner
s
Mar
an G
as M
ariti
me
MIS
C
Gas
Log
Iino
Line
s
Gol
ar L
NG
BW G
roup
Chi
na L
NG
Shi
ppin
g
Dyn
agas
Kore
a Li
ne
BGT/
NLN
G
BP S
hipp
ing
Hyu
ndai
LN
G S
hipp
ing
SK S
hipp
ing
Knut
sen
OA
S Sh
ippi
ng
Hoe
gh L
NG
Num
ber
of S
hips
Part Ownership
Full Ownership
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 7
52%38%
10%
Independent
Project/Govt
Other
70%
22%
8%
Independent
Project/Govt
Other
Ownership shift from projects to independent owners
1990 2020*
*based on current fleet & orderbook
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 8
LNG Ship Financing
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 9
Independents are at the center of fundraising activity
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 10
LNG shipowners need to be able to raise large amounts of debt and equity • LNG carrier typically costs ~ $200 million
• ARC7 LNG icebreaker costs $320 million
• ARC7 ships for Russia’s Yamal LNG
project will cost $4.8bn in total • Fundraising climbed in 2015, then edged
lower in 2016
4.9
6.8
5.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2014 2015 2016
$bill
ion
LNG Ship Fundraising
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 11
Shipping companies tap a variety of funding sources
• Corporate finance – raised by the
company for one or more vessels
• Project finance – limited recourse to the shipowner. Loan paid back from the ship’s earnings
• Leasing, sale and leaseback – prevails in Chinese transactions
• Capital markets – bonds and equities
Corporate finance Project finance
Leasing, sale and leaseback Capital markets
Funding Sources
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 12
Loans are the dominant method used by shipping companies to raise funds
• Loans are either corporate or provided via project finance structures
Loans Bonds Shares, IPOs MLP drop down Sale, leaseback
2014
2015 2016
Equity purchase
$4.88 bn $6.80 bn $5.36 bn
3.46 0.51
0.45
0.29 0.36
0.29
4.38 0.65
0.46
0.37
0.96
3.14 0.43
1.31
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 13
Most funding raised by LNG shipping companies is for LNGCs (trading vessels)
• However, the floating LNG sector is growing…
LNGC FSRU FLNG
2014
2015 2016
Not Specified
$4.88 bn $6.80 bn $5.36 bn
4.75
0.61
3.74
1.08
1.16
0.83
3.80
0.40
0.68
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 14
Financing developments in the year ahead
• More shipping companies are likely to seek financing for FSRUs this year
• FSRU financing will continue to follow a similar pattern to that used for LNGCs
• Sufficiently long charters that allow for steady earnings give banks security that loans will
be paid back
• Only the top names in shipping can finance vessels without employment • Golar is expecting to continue with its FLNG conversion projects
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 15
LNG Ship Flag
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 16
Having the ship flagged to a trustworthy country is “absolutely make or break” for the financing
Financing an LNG Vessel – Lenders’ Areas of Focus
• Risk transfer within the charter documentation
• Experience/Strength of the shipowners/ shipmanager
• Project-on-Project risk
• Acceptability of flag/ mortgage
• Experience of yard
• Vessel technology (including size)
• Level of security, given loan and swaps tend to rank pari passu
• Quality of Charterer and its jurisdiction
• Refund guarantee
Criteria directly influenced by the choice of the Flag
Source: Societe Generale
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 17
The decision to insure a ship is a case by case evaluation of numerous, mostly technical, criteria
• A ship’s flag is one aspect of numerous data considered for the decision to insure a ship • LNG ships are almost exclusively registered under large, reputable flags
• With a poor quality flag, a shipowner – particularly an LNG shipowner - is unlikely to get
financing, insurance, and a charter • Unless the country is notoriously inexperienced or troubled, the detailed flag state
performance is not the most critical evaluation criteria
• Insurers place a stronger emphasis on the quality of the Classification Societies and the shipowners’ reputation
• Flag’s rules on personal or pollution liabilities can escalate P&I premium
• In LNG Shipping, there is no clear link between the Flag State and the claims rate
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 18
Conclusion
MONTH 2009
© POTEN & PARTNERS 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© POTEN & PARTNERS APRIL 2017 Page 19
Conclusion
• LNG carriers and FSRUs will continue to be funded via diverse means
• This will depend on which pools of funding offer the best pricing and liquidity at the time
• FLNG funding is in its infancy
• Acceptance by international commercial banks will depend on the successful
implementation of these projects • Small scale sector is expected to continue to attract development bank support
• Assessment of LNG vessels by potential lenders will continue to be made on a case-by-
case basis
• Creditworthy owners with long charters will see better appetite from financiers than weaker competitors