1
28 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN JANUARY 2004 RODGER DOYLE news SCAN I n some parts of the world, such as Latin America, cohabitation is a widespread and ancient tradition, but in the U.S. and other Western countries, it barely existed three decades ago. In America today, for every 100 married couples, there are 10 unmarried cou- ples living together. But this statistic under- states the prevalence of the practice, as a third of all married women younger than 45 have cohabited at some point in their lives. Although an increasing number of older Americans do so, cohabitation takes place mostly among those 40 or younger and is gen- erally short-lived, with two thirds of unions lasting two years or less. Those who cohabit tend to have less income and education, are less religious, and are more likely than non- cohabitants to come from broken homes. Liv- ing together, more so for whites than blacks, is usually a prelude to marriage, although about one out of four cohabiting women do not see their unions as a first step to marriage but simply as an alternative to being single or dating. Some cohabitants live with parents, relatives or housemates. Cohabitation tends to be most prevalent in New England, Flori- da and the West and least prevalent in the South, the most conservatively religious re- gion in the U.S. Little evidence supports the popular no- tion that cohabitation is good training for marriage. Indeed, some research shows that those who cohabit are more likely to suffer marital discord and divorce. Other research, however, suggests that cohabitation as such is not to blame; rather it is the behavior of co- habitants, some of whom are prone to vio- lence and excessive drinking. Compared with those in married-couple families, children in cohabiting families tend be poorer, are not as well fed and are not read to as frequently; they also have more behavioral problems. Chil- dren living with married parents fare better, although their advantage over children living with cohabiting parents may reflect race, eth- nicity and their parents’ education. The num- ber of cohabiting couples with children is growing rapidly, and as things stand now, one in four children can expect to live in a cohab- iting family sometime during childhood. According to one theory, cohabitation thrives because women, with their growing fi- nancial independence, no longer feel the ur- gency of finding a husband to support them but nonetheless want to enjoy the benefits of a live-in partner. There is little evidence, how- ever, that affluent women find marriage less desirable. Another possible explanation is that women, particularly young women, may be more inclined to cohabit because of a grow- ing disenchantment with marriage, which they often see as a situation in which the wife takes on most of the domestic work. Still another explanation is that the need for an arrange- ment short of marriage was always there but remained unfulfilled until the 1970s, when feminism, oral contraception, more individ- ualistic attitudes and social activism com- bined to loosen the bonds of convention. The rise in cohabitation has only partial- ly made up for the decline in marriage. Fewer than 60 percent of those who cohabit have never married, and thus the increase in the never-marrieds in the past three decades re- sults only in part from rising cohabitation. Rodger Doyle can be reached at [email protected] Living Together IN THE U.S., COHABITATION IS HERE TO STAY BY RODGER DOYLE BY THE NUMBERS Family Status Percent Never married 58 Divorced, separated 37 Widowed 4 Children 43 No children 57 Age Percent Under 20 2 20–29 36 30–39 29 40–54 25 55–64 5 65+ 3 Race Percent White (non-Hispanic) 70 Black 13 Hispanic 14 Asian and Pacific Islanders 2 Native Americans 1 CHARACTERISTICS OF COHABITANTS Changes in Family Structure and Child Well-Being: Evidence from the 2002 National Survey of America’s Families. Gregory Acs and Sandi Nelson. Urban Institute, 2003. www.urban.org Unions 2003. The National Marriage Project. http://marriage.rutgers.edu Center for Family and Demographic Research. See papers by Wendy Manning, Susan Brown and Pamela Smock. www.bgsu.edu/ organizations/cfdr/main.html FURTHER READING SOURCE: U.S. Census. Data on cohabitants from Philip N. Cohen, University of California, Irvine. COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC.

Living Together

  • Upload
    rodger

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Living Together

28 S C I E N T I F I C A M E R I C A N J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 4

RO

DG

ER

DO

YLE

newsSCAN

In some parts of the world, such as LatinAmerica, cohabitation is a widespread andancient tradition, but in the U.S. and other

Western countries, it barely existed threedecades ago. In America today, for every 100married couples, there are 10 unmarried cou-ples living together. But this statistic under-states the prevalence of the practice, as a thirdof all married women younger than 45 havecohabited at some point in their lives.

Although an increasing number of olderAmericans do so, cohabitation takes place

mostly among those 40 or younger and is gen-erally short-lived, with two thirds of unionslasting two years or less. Those who cohabittend to have less income and education, areless religious, and are more likely than non-cohabitants to come from broken homes. Liv-ing together, more so for whites than blacks,is usually a prelude to marriage, althoughabout one out of four cohabiting women donot see their unions as a first step to marriagebut simply as an alternative to being single ordating. Some cohabitants live with parents,relatives or housemates. Cohabitation tendsto be most prevalent in New England, Flori-da and the West and least prevalent in theSouth, the most conservatively religious re-gion in the U.S.

Little evidence supports the popular no-tion that cohabitation is good training formarriage. Indeed, some research shows thatthose who cohabit are more likely to suffermarital discord and divorce. Other research,however, suggests that cohabitation as such isnot to blame; rather it is the behavior of co-habitants, some of whom are prone to vio-lence and excessive drinking. Compared withthose in married-couple families, children incohabiting families tend be poorer, are not aswell fed and are not read to as frequently; theyalso have more behavioral problems. Chil-dren living with married parents fare better,although their advantage over children livingwith cohabiting parents may reflect race, eth-nicity and their parents’ education. The num-ber of cohabiting couples with children isgrowing rapidly, and as things stand now, onein four children can expect to live in a cohab-iting family sometime during childhood.

According to one theory, cohabitationthrives because women, with their growing fi-nancial independence, no longer feel the ur-gency of finding a husband to support thembut nonetheless want to enjoy the benefits ofa live-in partner. There is little evidence, how-ever, that affluent women find marriage lessdesirable. Another possible explanation is thatwomen, particularly young women, may bemore inclined to cohabit because of a grow-ing disenchantment with marriage, which theyoften see as a situation in which the wife takeson most of the domestic work. Still anotherexplanation is that the need for an arrange-ment short of marriage was always there butremained unfulfilled until the 1970s, whenfeminism, oral contraception, more individ-ualistic attitudes and social activism com-bined to loosen the bonds of convention.

The rise in cohabitation has only partial-ly made up for the decline in marriage. Fewerthan 60 percent of those who cohabit havenever married, and thus the increase in thenever-marrieds in the past three decades re-sults only in part from rising cohabitation.

Rodger Doyle can be reached [email protected]

Living TogetherIN THE U.S., COHABITATION IS HERE TO STAY BY RODGER DOYLE

BY

THE

NU

MB

ER

S

Family Status PercentNever married 58Divorced, separated 37Widowed 4Children 43No children 57

Age PercentUnder 20 220–29 3630–39 2940–54 2555–64 565+ 3

Race PercentWhite (non-Hispanic) 70Black 13Hispanic 14Asian and Pacific Islanders 2Native Americans 1

CHARACTERISTICS OF COHABITANTS

Changes in Family Structureand Child Well-Being: Evidencefrom the 2002 National Survey

of America’s Families. Gregory Acs and Sandi Nelson.

Urban Institute, 2003.www.urban.org

Unions 2003. The National Marriage Project.

http://marriage.rutgers.edu

Center for Family and DemographicResearch. See papers by

Wendy Manning, Susan Brown andPamela Smock. www.bgsu.edu/

organizations/cfdr/main.html

FURTHERREADING

S O U R C E : U . S . C e n s u s . D a t a o n c o h a b i t a n t s f r o m P h i l i p N . C o h e n , U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a , I r v i n e .

COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC.