Upload
halien
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Live, Virtual & Constructive
Challenges & Opportunities
Mark Phillips
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
Chief Engineer for LVC
Chief Architect ACES
2
Overview
• What is LVC (Fast Jet Context)
• Why LVC?
• A Systems View of LVC
• What has been Achieved to Date?
• Electro-Optical Targeting
• What’s Next?
• Questions
“Trust One Who Has Gone Through It!” Virgil
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
3
What is LVC?
Live Synthetic
Live Virtual Constructive
People Real Real Simulated
Equipment Real Simulated Simulated
Looks Straight Forward, Right?
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
4
Airspace Limitations
(Size, Altitude,
Weapons, Threats)
Peacetime Adversary Support
Stress 5th Gen Fighter Pilots
Flying Hour and
Force Structure
Reductions
Rapidly Advancing Threat
Realistic Scenarios and Tactics
Reduce Cost / Maximize Training
Why is it Important
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
5
Link 16 Net
MROC
MPA
AWACS
LVC Bigger Problem
LVC Requires a Separate Wireless Network to C2
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
Why ?
6
LVC – Mixed Realities
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
Platform 1Virtual
Platform 2Live
Wired Communications
Wireless – Data Link
Range
Range ControlInstructor
Operations Station
SAM 1 Live Radar
Virtual Missile
Constructive Threat Environment
SAM 2 Live/Virtual
SAM 1 Constructive
SAM 2 Constructive
Live IlluminationConstructive Illumination
Range Radio
Ground Station
Full Mission Simulators (FMS)
7
Jericho Design Principles
• Top-down design meets bottom-up innovation
• Strategy led: compass versus map
• Mission outcome focused
– aim to engage workforce and sustain momentum
– incremental improvement in joint war-fighting outcomes, sensitive to step function opportunities
– illuminate required organisational changes:
• AWC – the innovation centre of excellence, where mile deep mastery is integrated across the Joint Force
• supported by LVC experimentation and training
• confronting process challenges such as security management (federated interoperability) and risk appetite (fail culture)
How ?
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
8
When ?
RAAF CAF Directions -
Launched Plan Jericho - February 2015
Established Jericho Team model – O6 led in March 2015
Draft the future CONOPS - in 2015
Update C4ISR architecture / processes
Align Capability Roadmaps, Integrators and Enablers
Establish an Air Warfare Centre -by January 2016
Cross Group /Service innovation, experimentation &
integration
Concept demonstrators –e.g. OSA network
demonstrators
Prioritise acquisition of an LVC capability
Reassess acquisition and sustainment models
Industry partnerships above the project level
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
The Perfect Storm
9
Divide & Conquer
• The Problem Space for the Live Platform Can be Broken into Four
Distinct Elements
– Mission System Behavior
– Network (Wireless and Wired)
– Simulation Environment (Including the Range)
– Workflow (If not Done Correctly will Make LVC Expensive)
• Work all LVC Problems Separately but Concurrently (No Need to
boil the Ocean)
• Key Design Assumptions
– Minimal Mission System Impact
– Minimal Hardware and Wiring Modification Impact (If Possible
None!)
– Do not Ride the C2 (e.g. Link 16) Network (Create a Separate LVC
Network)
– Use Open Specifications to Get Data to and from the Platform
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
10
Approach To LVC on F-16
• Interviews with SME’s – Understand the Use cases for Training
– What are the most important functional requirements
– What MUST Happen!
• Create Requirements from Use Cases and Technical Manuals
– Prioritize within R&D or Program Budget
– Assess Technical Risk
• Interface with Mission Systems Team
– Minimal Impact to Operation Flight Programs (OFP)
– Assess Changes and Tradeoffs Based on Architecture
• Establish Hardware in the Loop Test Environment
– Mimic Live Flight Environment with Real Hardware
– Incorporate Virtual and Constructive Systems
– Repeat Until Stable
• Live Flight Test
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
11
Mission System
Sensor 1
Sensor 2
Sensor n
PVI
A Systems View of LVC
FS
C
Platform Considerations:
• Architecture of the Vehicle
• Impact & Cost (OFP)
• Type and Duty Cycle of Bus
• Mission Types (Weapons)
• Conservation of Bandwidth
• Range (Latency, Distance)
• Sensors
Overall LVC Considerations:
• Security
• Network Design (Wired and Wireless)
• Simulation (Onboard/Offboard)
• Data Link
• Range Architecture
• Heterogeneous Platforms
• Workflow (Scenario Planning)
• Execution
• Mission Types (Use Cases)
Synthetic Considerations:
• Fidelity of Environment
• V&V
• Network Architecture
• Distributed Simulation (Platform to Range)
• Latency
• Protocols
• Interfaces
• Range assets (Threat Emitters)
• Effects
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
Technologies
• Radios
• Trusted Computing Environments
• Models & Simulations
• Sensors, Mission Systems
• Guards
12
Basic High Level Architecture for F-16
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
13
What has Been Achieved To Date
• After two years of testing:
– F-16 block 50 flew on June 24 2014 Fort Worth Texas
– Wingman (Medium Level Simulator)
– Threat Environment (Completely Ground Based)
– Altitude >30,000 Ft
– Scenario Modified on the Fly
– 14 Aggressors and SAM sites
CARD NO.
(1 of 1)
LVC SYSTEM A-A 2v4
Red Threat Maneuvering with SAM
RUN NO:
LVC-002
RUN NO:
General LMFD FCR RMFD HSD
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of LVC functions and symbology RANGE: LOCAL, LM North or South TARGET: 4 Red Air Notes:
MSTR MODE: SUB MODE:
AA D/C
RANGE:
80
RANGE: 80
1. VERIFY ON DL, KG-250, EMU, Link Establised, DVR (Record FCR and HSD Displays) 2. VERIFY tracks displayed on FCR and HSD 3. VERIFY accurate vector sticks/altitudes and smoothly tracking 4. VERIFY radar track files on LMFD (FCR) correlated with Link-16 tracks (when in range and inside Blue FCR azimuth/elevation coverage) 5. BL1 ENGAGE Sort targets, FCR lock on red WEST -use CRM/RWS Multi-target track mode 6. BL2 ENGAGE East 7. VERIFY -aspect angle, heading, speed, closure, altitude - weapons symbology, proper changes through engagement - HUD symbology accuracy 8. TMS Right - step between targets; observe proper symbology 9. TMS Right >1 sec - check transition/operation of CRM/TWS radar mode 10. TMS forward - enter STT on one of the tracks; other tracks fade 11. TMS aft - return to Multi-track mode -use CRM/RWS Multi-target track mode 12. Launch A-120 - @ 75% Rmax, observe symbology, flyout timing 13. MANEUVER - Crank/F—pole, maintain Blue formation - if targeted, execute defensive beam or drag 14. VERIFY - Red Air fade if defeated or Blue MORT
50nm
4 TARGETs + TOO +SAM
GS: A/R
MSL: A/R
F-16
• Data Link Worked as Predicted
• No Pod (Organic to Platform)
• No Simulation on Aircraft
• Four Radar Modes supported
• RWR (EW) Supported)
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
14
Base Objectives
Create an Ethernet Interface Control Document (ICD) that allows virtual
targets to be injected
Update the Sniper Operational Flight Program (OFP) to display all virtual
targets within the field of view as a symbology element
Update an aircraft interface to allow a pilot to enable or disable the
functionality
Update the OFP to allow the pilot to acquire the virtual target in both Air
to Ground and Air to Air Single Target Track
Additional Objectives
Update the OFP to allow the pilot to acquire the virtual target in Air to
Ground MTT
Allow the pilot to track both real and virtual targets
ACES & Electro Optical Targeting (Sniper)
Phase 1 Objectives
Completed all Phase 1 Objectives
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
15
Next?
• Partner with Governments to Understand the Art of the Doable
• Develop and recommend techniques, specifications and methods to
make LVC work across Heterogeneous Platforms
• Continue to Support Growth of Sensor and Mission System Needs
• Focus on Outcomes (Capability)
– One Mission Planning Capability (Live and Virtual Assets Treated
the Same)
– One Debrief for Live & Virtual (Competency Based?)
• We have Proven the Approach on the F-22 (Hardware in the Loop)
• F-35 is a Core Focus Moving Forward
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved
© 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved