Litigation Servicing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    1/19

    Litigation Forum - LitigationInvolving Servicing

    MBA Regulatory Compliance Conference / September 2011

    Standing, Affidavits & Other

    Procedural Challenges

    Leah Getlan

    Assistant General Counsel

    Capital One

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    2/19

    2

    Introduction

    RealtyTrac reports August 2011as 11th consecutive month of

    year over year activity decreasein foreclosures

    August foreclosure filings down33% from previous year

    But uptick in mortgage defaultsoverall, and first time defaultnotices at nine month high lastmonth (up 33% from previousmonth)

    Are Lenders Starting to PushThrough After Foreclosure

    Delays?

    How Will This Affect LitigationVolume?

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    3/19

    3

    IntroductionPassing the SATs

    Standing

    Affidavits

    Technical Violations of State Law

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    4/19

    4

    Standing

    Lender or Assignee Must Prove Ownership or

    Possession of the Note to Bring ForeclosureAction

    Complications:

    MERS

    Defective Assignments

    Lost Notes / Assignments

    Pooling and Servicing Agreements /Securitizations

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    5/19

    5

    Standing

    U.S. Bank National Association v. Ibanez

    (Mass. Jan. 7, 2011) Foreclosure sale void where securitization

    trustee cannot provide valid assignment of loanpre-foreclosure

    Securitization agreement / executed purchase& sale agreement with related schedulesattached can establish right to foreclose, even if

    no recordation in land records

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    6/19

    6

    Standing

    US Bank v. Congress (Cir. Ct. Ala., Feb. 23,

    2011)

    Trustee of securitized trust has standing tobring foreclosure if it holds the Note; party does

    not have to own the Note to have standing

    Listing of loan on PSA schedules evidence that

    loan transferred timely into trust

    Borrower does not have standing to invoke

    PSA choice of law provision

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    7/19

    7

    Standing

    Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v.

    Mitchell(N.J. Super. App. Div, Aug. 9, 2011)

    Foreclosing Plaintiff lacked standing when itinitiated foreclosure action one day before ittook assignment of the mortgage

    Amended pleading could not cure standingdefect

    Must own or possess the note to have standing

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    8/19

    8

    Standing - MERS

    Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans

    Inc, et al. (9th Cir. (Ariz.), Sept7, 2011)

    9th Circuit affirmed dismissal with prejudice of putativeclass action against MERS for conspiracy to commit fraud

    Security Instrument discloses the role and rights of MERSand plaintiff signed the contract and agreed to terms

    Borrowers suffered no injury as a result of MERS asbeneficiary (e.g. terms of loan, ability to repay or ability tomodify loan terms)

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    9/19

    9

    Standing - MERS

    Jenkins v. McCalla Raymer(N.D. Ga., Aug. 31,2011)

    Court dismissed putative class action and rejectedtheory that MERS assignment of SIs fraudulent

    Henderson v. MERS(Ala. , Sept. 9, 2011)

    As mortgagee and nominee of the originating

    lender, MERS has legal right to enforce terms ofthe mortgage, including foreclosure rights

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    10/19

    10

    Standing - MERSDallas County v. Merscorp Inc., et al(Dallas County,

    TX) Lawsuit brought by Dallas County D.A. alleging MERS

    tracking system violates Texas law

    BofA sued as shareholder of MERS for allegedly knowing

    the system would cause improper filing in Texas

    Residential Funding Co. LLC v. Saurman (Mich. App.,April 21, 2011)

    MERS cannot foreclose by advertisement under Michiganlaw because it did not own the requisite interest in the debt

    Contractual provisions providing right to foreclose toMERS could not override state law requirements

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    11/19

    11

    Affidavits

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    12/19

    12

    Affidavits

    Witnesses must have knowledge of the facts to which they

    are attesting Assertions should be supported by the evidence

    Complications:

    Overuse and inappropriate use of phrase personalknowledge

    Delegated review of business records & accountinformation

    Missing or defective documentation Delegated signatories

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    13/19

    13

    Affidavits

    Glarum v. LaSalle Bank, N.A. (Fla. 4thDCA,

    Sept. 7, 2011) Servicers foreclosure affidavit containing

    payment information from prior servicerconstituted inadmissible hearsay

    Business records exception to hearsay did notapply where affiant did not know who how orwhen data entries made and could not verify

    that the entries were correct

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    14/19

    14

    Affidavits

    Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v.Hansen (Ohio App., March 10, 2011)

    Foreclosure affidavit confirming unpaid balance andinterest rate and attaching screen shot from system

    did not meet business records exception to hearsaywhere affiant did not know who entered informationinto system and how the information was collectedand compiled

    To authenticate business records must be sufficientlyfamiliar with business operations and circumstancesof records preparation, maintenance & retrieval

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    15/19

    15

    Other Issues & Challenges

    Vacant Property Laws & Lawsuits

    City of LA v. Deutsche Bank City of Chicago vacant property bill

    Foreclosure Prevention Mediations

    Pasillas v. HSBC Bank USA Sanctions appropriateagainst lender for failure to strictly comply withForeclosure Mediation Program requirements regardingdocumentation and personal attendance by someone

    authorized to modify loan

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    16/19

    16

    FDCPA Case of Note

    Atwood v. Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger, PLLP(D. Minn, August 1, 2011)

    Class cert denied in lawsuit claiming second collection letterdemanding immediate payment sent after debt validation letterviolated FDCPA by overshadowing right to challenge validity of the

    debt

    Court found individual question existing as to when second letterreceived by each borrower

    Plaintiff failed to meet Rule 23(b)(3) because based on estimated sizeof class and FDCPA limit for class recovery, individual borrowers couldrecover $1000 statutory damages plus actual damages individually vs.$7.43 as a class

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    17/19

    17

    Tips From The Trenches

    Get it right from the beginning

    Bad facts make bad law - Dont litigate with badfacts

    Have witnesses personally review loan level data,understand where it comes from & be comfortablewith the facts

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    18/19

    18

    Tips From The Trenches

    Fully Engage in Loss Mitigation Discussions

    Early To Avoid Unnecessary Delays & Costs

    Document The Process

    Set Firm Deadlines and Expectations

    Always keep long term goals and the big picture inmind

  • 8/3/2019 Litigation Servicing

    19/19

    19

    Tips From The Trenches

    Hold high standards for foreclosure,

    eviction & bankruptcy proceedings

    Expediency should not be the only priority dont letthe need for speed cloud judgment

    Your reputation is on the line always