List of Cases in Agency

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

List of cases in Agency

Citation preview

  • x 1 2

    x

    xx

    x

    xxxx

    x

    xx

    x

    xx

    x Week No. 2

    x

    A.General Provisions (Art. 1767-1783)

    1. What is a contract of partnership? (Art. 1767)

    2. Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769)

    3. Distinction between partnership and a private corporation- 1 Fletcher, Cyc. Corp., Sec. 20

    4. Formalities required by law for the organization/constitution of partnership (Art. 1771, 1772, 1773, 1843)

    5. Different kinds of partnership

  • xx

    x

    x

    x

    xx

    x

    x

    xxx

    xx

    xx

    xx

    x Week No. 3

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    a)As to object (Art. 1777, 1778, 1780, 1783)

    i.Universal Partnershipii. Particular Partnershipb) As to liability of the partners

    i.General Partnership

    ii.Limited Partnership

    6. Different kinds of partners

    a)Industrial Partner

    b)Capitalist Partnerc)General Partnerd)Limited Partner

    e)Managing Partnerf)Silent Partner

    g)Ostensible Partnerh)Secret Partner

    i)Partner by Estoppel

    B. Obligations of the Partners (Art. 1784-1827)

    1. Obligations of the partners among themselves (Art. 1784-1809)

    a) Distribution of profits and losses of partnership

    i.With agreement

    ii.Without agreement

  • xx

    x

    x

    x

    xxx Week No. 4

    xx

    x

    x

    x

    xx

    b) Principle of Delectus Personae (Art. 1804)

    -Ortega, et al. v. CA, et al., 245 SCRA 529-Tocao, et al. v. CA, 342 SCRA 20

    -JG Summit Holdings v. CA, Sept. 24, 2003, G.R. No. 124293

    c) Management of Partnership (Art. 1800-1803)

    d) When partner can demand for a formal accounting of partnership affairs (Art. 1807, 1809)

    1. Property rights of a partner (Art. 1810-1814)

    a) Incidents of co-ownership (Art. 1811)

    b)Partners interest in the partnership (Art. 1812)

    c)Effect of conveyance of interest in the partnership to third persons (Art. 1813)d) Charging order upon partners interest (Art. 1814)

  • xx

    x

    x

    x (Art. 1816 in rel. to 1824)

    x

    xx (Art. 1818, par. 3)x

    x Weeks No. 5 and 6x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    2. Obligations of the partner with regard to third persons (Art. 1815-1827)

    a) Requisites prescribed by law in order that a partnership may be held liable to third persons for the act of one partner (Art. 1816, 1822, 1823, 1824)

    b) Concept of Mutual Agency (Art. 1818) c) Partners liability for partnership obligation (nature)

    -Liwanag vs. Workmens Compenstion Commission, 105 Phil. 741

    d) Prohibited acts of partners (unless authorized)

    C. Dissolution and Winding Up (Art. 1828-1842)

    1. Definition and Effects (Art. 1828, 1829)

    -difference between Dissolution and Winding Up

    2. Causes of dissolution (Art. 1830,1831)

  • xxx (Art. 1832, 1834)

    x

    x

    x

    x

    xxx Week No. 7

    x

    x

    x

    x

    xx

    xx Week No. 8x II. AGENCY

    x

    3. Effect of dissolution caused by act, death or insolvency of a partner (Art. 1833)

    4. Residual powers of managing partner and exceptions thereto

    5. Duty to wind up/ liquidate partnership affairs (Art. 1836)

    -Aldecoa & Co. vs. Warner, Barnes & Co., 16 Phil. 423

    -Po Yeng Cheo vs. Lim Ka Yan, 44 Phil. 172-Guidote vs. Borja, 53 Phil. 900

    6.Order of payment in the winding up of partnership liabilities (Art. 1839)

    D. Limited Partnership (Art. 1843-1867)1. Definition/ Concept/ Nature

    2.Power/ Duties/ Rights of a Limited Partner

    3.Entitlements of a limited partner after dissolution

  • xx 1. World Context

    x 2. Philippine Context

    x

    x

    x

    xx

    x

    x 1. Agency as a contract

    xx

    x

    A.Historical Context

    -Laws 28 and 32, Title 12, Partida 3

    -Spanish Civil Code (Civil Agency)

    -Spanish Code of Commerce (Commercial Agency)

    -Civil Code Art. 2270 (2)

    B. Nature, Concept and Purpose

    a) Definition (Art. 1868)

  • xx

    x

    x

    x

    x d) Purpose

    x 2. Agency as a relation

    x

    xx

    x Week No. 9

    x

    x a) Partnership (Art. 1767)

    b) Essential requisites/ elements (Art. 1318)

    -Rallos vs. Felix Go Chan & Sons Realty Corp., 81 SCRA 251

    c) Characteristics

    a) Fiduciary character

    b) Representative character

    3. Agency distinguished from/ compared with other relations

  • xx

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    xxx e) Loan (Art. 1933)x

    xx f) Sale (Art. 1458)

    x

    x

    b) Lease of Work or Service (Art. 1644)

    -Nielson & Company, Inc. v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company, 26 SCRA 540

    - De la Cruz v. Northern Theatrical Enterprises, 95 Phil. 739

    c) Independent Contractor (Art. 1713)

    - Fressel v. Mariano Uy Chaco & Co., 34 Phil 122

    - Shell Company of the Phil. V. Firemens Insurance, 100 Phil. 757

    - Africa v. Caltex Phil., Inc., 16 SCRA 448

    d) Negotiorum Gestio (Art. 2144-2145)

    - Jai Alai Corp. v. BPI, 66 SCRA 29

    - Quiroga v. Persons Hardware, 38 Phil. 501

    - Gonzalo Puyat and Sons v. Arco Amusement Co., 72 Phil. 402

  • xx

    x

    xx 133 SCRA 697

    xx

    x g) Trusteeship (Art. 1440)x - 2 C.J.S. 1034x

    xx

    x - 2 C.J.S. 1027

    x - 3 AmJur 2d 421

    x

    xx

    x - 2 C.J.S. 1027x

    - Velasco v. Universal Trading Co. v. Lim Teck Suan, 97 Phil. 171

    - Pearl Island Commercial Corp. v. Lim Tiang Tong, 101 Phil. 789- Lim v. People, 133 SCRA 333

    - Green Valley Poultry & allied Products, Inc. v. IAC

    - Bert Osmea & Associates v. CA, 120 SCRA 395

    h)Broker

    - Pacific Commercial Co. v. Yatco, 68 Phil. 398i)Guardianship

    - Fessenden v. Jones, 75 Am. Dec. 445

    - McDonald v. spring Valley, 120 N.E. 476, 2 ALR 1355j)Bailment

    k)Ship Agent

  • xx

    x Week No.10

    x

    x 1. General Classification

    x

    xxxx

    xxx

    x

    x 2. Kinds of Actual Agency

    x

    x

    - Switzerland Genral Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Ramirez, 96 SCRA 297

    C. Kinds, Creation and Existence

    a) Actual Agency (Art. 1868)

    b) Apparent or Ostensible Agency (Art. 1873)

    c) Agency by Estoppel

    - Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 553

    a) As to manner of creation (Art. 1869)

    b) As to character (Art. 1875)

  • xxx

    x

    xx

    xx

    xx

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    c) As to extent (Art. 1876)

    d) As to scope of authority (Art. 1877, 1878)

    3. Creation and Elements of Actual Agency

    a) Consent/ Mandate

    - Jimenez v. Rabot, 38 Phil. 357- Lian v. Puno, 31 Phil. 259

    - Katigbak v. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil. 622

  • xx

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    xx

    x Week No. 11x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x -U.S. vs. Kiene, 7 Phil. 736

    x -U.S. v. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791

    x

    - Amigo v. Teves, 96 Phil. 252

    - Villa v. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil. 126

    - Dir. Of Public Works v. Sing Juco, 53 Phil. 205- BPI v. De Coster, 47 Phil. 594

    - Germann & Co. v. Donaldson, 1 Phil. 63- Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 533

    - Municipal Council of Iloilo v. Evangelista, 55 Phil.290

    - Yu Chuck v. Kong Li Po, 46 Phil. 608- Insular Drug v. PNB, 58 Phil. 683

    D.Obligations of the Agent

    -Intl Films (China) v. Lyric Films Exchange, 63 Phil. 778

    -Nepomuceno, et al. v. Heredia, 7 Phil. 563

    -Domingo v. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131

    -Ojinaga v. Estate of Perez, 9 Phil. 185

  • xx

    x

    xx

    x

    x

    xx

    x Week 12x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    -De Borja v. De Borja, 58 Phil. 811

    -PNB v. Welch,Ffairchild, & Co., 44 Phil. 780

    -Harry Keeler Electric Co. v. Rodriguez, 44 Phil. 19-Austria v. CA, 39 SCRA 527

    E. Obligations of the Principal

    -Gonzales & Gomez v. Haberer, 47 Phil. 380

    -Albaladejo y Cia. Phil. Refining Co., 45 Phil. 556

    F. Modes of Extinguishment of Agency-Barretto v. Santa Maria, 26 Phil. 440

    -Coleongco v. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577

    -De Buncio & Co. v. Ong Guan Gan, 60 Phil. 696

    -New Manila Lumber Co., Inc. v. Republic, 107 Phil. 824

    -Infante v. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 693-Valera v. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695

    -Buason and Reyes v. Panuyas, 105 Phil. 795

  • xx

    x

    xx

    x Week No. 13x III. TRUSTS

    xxx

    x

    x

    x

    x

    xx 3. Resulting Trust

    x 4. Constructive Trustx Week No. 14

    x

    x 1. In relation to laches

    -Herrera, et al. v. Luy Kim Guam, 110 Phil. 1020-Del Rosario v. Abad, 104 Phil. 648-Pasno v. Ravina, 54 Phil. 378-Perez v. PNB, 17 SCRA 834

    A.DefinitionB.Parties

    C.Different Kinds of Trusts1. Express Trust (Art. 1443-1446)

    -Ramos v. Ramos, 61 SCRA 284

    2. Implied Trust (Art. 1447-1457)

    -CUAYCONG V. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192

    D.Enforcement of Trust

  • xxx

    x

    xx

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x -Ecsay v. CA, 61 SCRA 369

    x

    x

    a) Fabian v. Fabian, 21 SCRA 213

    b) Sotto v. Teves, 86 SCRA 154

    2. In relation to Statute of Limitations

    a) Gerona v. De Guzman, 11 SCRA 163

    E. Period of Prescription for Reconveyance of Real Property Based on Implied Trust-Carantes v. CA, 76 SCRA 514-Alarcon v. Bidin, 120 SCRA 390-Bueno v. Reyes, 27 SCRA 1179

    -Varsity Hills, Inc. v. Navarro, 43 SCRA 503

    -Jaramil v. CA, 78 SCRA 420

    -Vda. De Nacalaban vs. CA, 80 SCRA 428

  • xx

    x

    -Duque v. Domingo, 80 SCRA 654-Tongoy v. CA, 123 SCRA 99-Caragay-Lagno v. CA, 133 SCRA 718

  • 3 4

    - Santos vs. Sps. Reyes, 368 SCRA 261

    -Negado vs. Makabenta, 54 O.G. 4082-Yulo vs. Yang Chiaco Seng, L-12541, Aug. 28, 1959

    -Heirs of Tan Eng Kee vs. CA, 341 SCRA 740 (citing Evangelista vs. Collector of Internal Revenue, 54 O.G. 996)

  • i. Critique/ Articles

    -Espiritu, XV Lawyers Journal 297

  • ii. Other definitions

    - J.B.L. Reyes, XVI Lawyers Journal 138

  • -De la Pea v. Hidalgo, 16 Phil. 450

    -2 C.J.S. 1030

  • -J.B.L. Reyes 16 Lawyers Journal 138-Rallos v. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269-Compaia General de Tabacos v. Diaba, 20 Phil. 321

    - 2 C.J. 444-445- 2 C.J. 464-466

  • i. Manifestation of Mandate

    - Implied

    ii. Manifestation of Acceptance

    - Express (Art. 1869, 1874)

    - Conde v. CA, 199 SCRA 245

    -Express (Art. 1869, 1870)

    -Implied (Art. 1870-1872)

  • 5 6 7 8

    1

    23

    4

    5678

    9

    1011

    12

    131415

    16

    Collector of Internal Revenue, 54 O.G. 996)

  • 17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    2223

    24

    25

    262728

    2930

    3132

    333435

    36

    37

    38

    39

    40

  • 41

    42

    43

    44

    45

    464748

    4950

    51

    52

    53

    5455

  • 56

    57

    58

    59

    60

    61

    6263646566

    67

    68

    69

    70

  • 71

    7273

    74

    75

    76

    77

    78798081

    82

    83

    84

    858687888990

  • 9192

    93

    94

    95

    96

    9798

    99

    100

    101102

    103

  • 104105

    106

    107

    108

    109

    110

    111

    112113114

    115

    116

  • 117

    118

    119

    120

    121

    122

    123

    124125126127

    128129

    130

    131

  • 132

    133

    134

    135136

    137138

    139140141

    142143

    144

    145

    146

    147148

    149150

  • 151152153

    154

    155

    156

    157158159160

    161162163

    164

    165

    166

    167

  • 168

    169170

    171

    172173

    174175

    176177

    178

    179

    180

    181

    182

  • 183

    184

    185

    186

    187

    188

    189

    190

    191192193194

    195

    196

    197

    198

    199

    200

    201

  • 202

    203

    204

    205206

    207

    208

    209210211212

    213

    214

    215

    216

    217

    218

    219

    220

  • 221

    222

    223

    224225226227228229230

    231

    232

    233

    234

    235236

    237238

    239

    240

  • 241

    242243

    244

    245246

    247

    248

    249

    250

    251

    252

    253

    254

  • 255

    256

    257

  • Page 49 of 56

    LIST OF CASES IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION 1ATTY. RANADA / SATURDAY / FACULTY

    No. Case Title Topic1 Santos vs. Sps. Reyes, 368 SCRA 261 What is a contract of partnership? (Art. 1767)

    2 Heirs of Tan Eng Kee vs. CA, 341 SCRA 740

    3 Negado vs. Makabenta, 54 O.G. 4082

    4 Yulo vs. Yang Chiaco Seng, L-12541, Aug. 28, 19595 Ortega, et al. v. CA, et al., 245 SCRA 529 b) Principle of Delectus Personae (Art. 1804)6 Tocao, et al. v. CA, 342 SCRA 20 b) Principle of Delectus Personae (Art. 1804)

    7 JG Summit Holdings v. CA, Sept. 24, 2003, G.R. No. 124293 b) Principle of Delectus Personae (Art. 1804)

    8 Liwanag vs. Workmens Compenstion Commission, 105 Phil. 741 ok

    9 Aldecoa & Co. vs. Warner, Barnes & Co., 16 Phil. 423 5. Duty to wind up/ liquidate partnership affairs (Art. 1836) ok

    10 Po Yeng Cheo vs. Lim Ka Yan, 44 Phil. 172 5. Duty to wind up/ liquidate partnership affairs (Art. 1836) ok

    11 Guidote vs. Borja, 53 Phil. 900 5. Duty to wind up/ liquidate partnership affairs (Art. 1836) ok

    12 Rallos vs. Felix Go Chan & Sons Realty Corp., 81 SCRA 251 Essential requisites/ elements (Art. 1318) ok

    13 Lease of Work or Service (Art. 1644)

    14 De la Cruz v. Northern Theatrical Enterprises, 95 Phil. 739 Lease of Work or Service (Art. 1644) ok15 Fressel v. Mariano Uy Chaco & Co., 34 Phil 122 Independent Contractor (Art. 1713)

    16 Shell Company of the Phil. V. Firemens Insurance, 100 Phil. 757 Independent Contractor (Art. 1713)17 Africa v. Caltex Phil., Inc., 16 SCRA 448 Independent Contractor (Art. 1713)18 De la Pea v. Hidalgo, 16 Phil. 450 Negotiorum Gestio (Art. 2144-2145) ok19 Jai Alai Corp. v. BPI, 66 SCRA 29 Loan (Art. 1933) ok20 Quiroga v. Persons Hardware, 38 Phil. 501 Sale (Art. 1458) ok

    21 Gonzalo Puyat and Sons v. Arco Amusement Co., 72 Phil. 402

    22 Velasco v. Universal Trading Co. v. Lim Teck Suan, 97 Phil. 171

    23 Pearl Island Commercial Corp. v. Lim Tiang Tong, 101 Phil. 78924 Lim v. People, 133 SCRA 333 ok25 Green Valley Poultry & allied Products, Inc. v. IAC ok26 Bert Osmea & Associates v. CA, 120 SCRA 395 ok27 Pacific Commercial Co. v. Yatco, 68 Phil. 39828 Fessenden v. Jones, 75 Am. Dec. 445

    29 McDonald v. spring Valley, 120 N.E. 476, 2 ALR 1355

    30 Switzerland Genral Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Ramirez, 96 SCRA 29731 Rallos v. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269 Apparent or Ostensible Agency (Art. 1873)32 Compaia General de Tabacos v. Diaba, 20 Phil. 321 Apparent or Ostensible Agency (Art. 1873) ok33 Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 553 Agency by Estoppel ok34 Conde v. CA, 199 SCRA 245 Manifestation of Mandate - Implied ok35 Jimenez v. Rabot, 38 Phil. 357 Manifestation of Acceptance - Implied (1872) ok36 Lian v. Puno, 31 Phil. 259 ok37 Katigbak v. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil. 622 ok38 Amigo v. Teves, 96 Phil. 252 ok39 Villa v. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil. 12640 Dir. Of Public Works v. Sing Juco, 53 Phil. 20541 BPI v. De Coster, 47 Phil. 59442 Germann & Co. v. Donaldson, 1 Phil. 6343 Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 53344 Municipal Council of Iloilo v. Evangelista, 55 Phil.29045 Yu Chuck v. Kong Li Po, 46 Phil. 60846 Insular Drug v. PNB, 58 Phil. 683

    47 Intl Films (China) v. Lyric Films Exchange, 63 Phil. 778 ok48 Nepomuceno, et al. v. Heredia, 7 Phil. 563 ok49 Domingo v. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131 ok

    1.Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769)

    1.Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769)

    1.Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769)

    Partners liability for partnership obligation (nature) (Art. 1816 in rel. to 1824)

    Nielson & Company, Inc. v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company, 26 SCRA 540

    h)Brokerh)Guardianship

    h)Guardianship

    h)Guardianship

    A.Obligations of the Agent

  • Page 50 of 56

    No. Case Title Topic50 U.S. vs. Kiene, 7 Phil. 736 ok51 U.S. v. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791 ok52 Ojinaga v. Estate of Perez, 9 Phil. 185 ok53 De Borja v. De Borja, 58 Phil. 811 ok54 PNB v. Welch,Ffairchild, & Co., 44 Phil. 780 ok55 Harry Keeler Electric Co. v. Rodriguez, 44 Phil. 19 ok56 Austria v. CA, 39 SCRA 52757 Gonzales & Gomez v. Haberer, 47 Phil. 38058 Albaladejo y Cia. Phil. Refining Co., 45 Phil. 55659 Barretto v. Santa Maria, 26 Phil. 440 ok60 Coleongco v. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577 ok61 De Buncio & Co. v. Ong Guan Gan, 60 Phil. 696 ok

    62 New Manila Lumber Co., Inc. v. Republic, 107 Phil. 824 ok63 Infante v. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 693 ok64 Valera v. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695 ok65 Buason and Reyes v. Panuyas, 105 Phil. 795 ok66 Herrera, et al. v. Luy Kim Guam, 110 Phil. 102067 Del Rosario v. Abad, 104 Phil. 64868 Pasno v. Ravina, 54 Phil. 37869 Perez v. PNB, 17 SCRA 83470 Ramos v. Ramos, 61 SCRA 284 Express Trust (Art. 1443-1446)71 CUAYCONG V. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192 Implied Trust (Art. 1447-1457)72 Fabian v. Fabian, 21 SCRA 213 In relation to laches73 Sotto v. Teves, 86 SCRA 154 In relation to laches74 Gerona v. De Guzman, 11 SCRA 163 In relation to Statute of Limitations75 Carantes v. CA, 76 SCRA 51476 Alarcon v. Bidin, 120 SCRA 390 ok77 Bueno v. Reyes, 27 SCRA 117978 Varsity Hills, Inc. v. Navarro, 43 SCRA 50379 Ecsay v. CA, 61 SCRA 36980 Jaramil v. CA, 78 SCRA 420 ok81 Vda. De Nacalaban vs. CA, 80 SCRA 428 ok82 Duque v. Domingo, 80 SCRA 654 ok83 Tongoy v. CA, 123 SCRA 99 ok84 Caragay-Lagno v. CA, 133 SCRA 718 ok

    A.Obligations of the Agent

    A.Obligations of the PrincipalA.Obligations of the Principal

    A.Modes of Extinguishment of Agency

    E. Period of Prescription for Reconveyance of Real Property Based on Implied Trust

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    No.123456789

    1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435

  • 3637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Case TitleRallos vs. Felix Go Chan & Sons Realty Corp., 81 SCRA 251

    Nielson & Company, Inc. v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company, 26 SCRA 540

    De la Cruz v. Northern Theatrical Enterprises, 95 Phil. 739

    Fressel v. Mariano Uy Chaco & Co., 34 Phil 122

    Shell Company of the Phil. V. Firemens Insurance, 100 Phil. 757

    Africa v. Caltex Phil., Inc., 16 SCRA 448

    De la Pea v. Hidalgo, 16 Phil. 450Jai Alai Corp. v. BPI, 66 SCRA 29

    Quiroga v. Persons Hardware, 38 Phil. 501

    Gonzalo Puyat and Sons v. Arco Amusement Co., 72 Phil. 402

    Velasco v. Universal Trading Co. v. Lim Teck Suan, 97 Phil. 171

    Pearl Island Commercial Corp. v. Lim Tiang Tong, 101 Phil. 789

    Lim v. People, 133 SCRA 333

    Green Valley Poultry & allied Products, Inc. v. IAC

    Bert Osmea & Associates v. CA, 120 SCRA 395

    Pacific Commercial Co. v. Yatco, 68 Phil. 398

    Fessenden v. Jones, 75 Am. Dec. 445

    McDonald v. spring Valley, 120 N.E. 476, 2 ALR 1355

    Switzerland Genral Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Ramirez, 96 SCRA 297

    Rallos v. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269

    Compaia General de Tabacos v. Diaba, 20 Phil. 321

    Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 553

    Conde v. CA, 199 SCRA 245

    Jimenez v. Rabot, 38 Phil. 357

    Lian v. Puno, 31 Phil. 259

    Katigbak v. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil. 622

    Amigo v. Teves, 96 Phil. 252

    Villa v. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil. 126

    Dir. Of Public Works v. Sing Juco, 53 Phil. 205

    BPI v. De Coster, 47 Phil. 594

    Germann & Co. v. Donaldson, 1 Phil. 63

    Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 533

    Municipal Council of Iloilo v. Evangelista, 55 Phil.290

    Yu Chuck v. Kong Li Po, 46 Phil. 608

    Insular Drug v. PNB, 58 Phil. 683

  • Intl Films (China) v. Lyric Films Exchange, 63 Phil. 778

    Nepomuceno, et al. v. Heredia, 7 Phil. 563

    Domingo v. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131

    U.S. vs. Kiene, 7 Phil. 736

    U.S. v. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791

    Ojinaga v. Estate of Perez, 9 Phil. 185

    De Borja v. De Borja, 58 Phil. 811

    PNB v. Welch,Ffairchild, & Co., 44 Phil. 780

    Harry Keeler Electric Co. v. Rodriguez, 44 Phil. 19

    Austria v. CA, 39 SCRA 527

    Gonzales & Gomez v. Haberer, 47 Phil. 380

    Albaladejo y Cia. Phil. Refining Co., 45 Phil. 556

    Barretto v. Santa Maria, 26 Phil. 440

    Coleongco v. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577

    De Buncio & Co. v. Ong Guan Gan, 60 Phil. 696

    New Manila Lumber Co., Inc. v. Republic, 107 Phil. 824

    Infante v. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 693

    Valera v. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695

    Buason and Reyes v. Panuyas, 105 Phil. 795

    Herrera, et al. v. Luy Kim Guam, 110 Phil. 1020

    Del Rosario v. Abad, 104 Phil. 648

    Pasno v. Ravina, 54 Phil. 378

    Perez v. PNB, 17 SCRA 834

    Ramos v. Ramos, 61 SCRA 284

    Cuaycong V. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192

    Fabian v. Fabian, 21 SCRA 213Sotto v. Teves, 86 SCRA 154

    Gerona v. De Guzman, 11 SCRA 163

    Carantes v. CA, 76 SCRA 514

    Alarcon v. Bidin, 120 SCRA 390

    Bueno v. Reyes, 27 SCRA 1179

    Varsity Hills, Inc. v. Navarro, 43 SCRA 503

    Ecsay v. CA, 61 SCRA 369

    Jaramil v. CA, 78 SCRA 420

    Vda. De Nacalaban vs. CA, 80 SCRA 428

    Duque v. Domingo, 80 SCRA 654

    Tongoy v. CA, 123 SCRA 99

    Caragay-Lagno v. CA, 133 SCRA 718

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page No.1 ~ 2

    3 ~ 4

    5 ~ 6

    7 ~ 8

    9 ~ 10

    11 ~ 12

    13 ~ 14

    15 ~ 16

    17 ~ 18

    19 ~ 20

    21 ~ 22

    23 ~ 24

    25

    26

    27 ~ 28

    29 ~ 30

    31 ~ 32

    33 ~ 34

    35 ~ 36

    37 ~ 38

    39 ~ 40

    41 ~ 42

    43 ~ 44

    45 ~ 46

    47 ~ 48

    49 ~ 50

    51 ~ 52

    53 ~ 54

    55 ~ 56

    57 ~ 58

    59 ~ 60

    61 ~ 62

    63 ~ 64

    65 ~ 66

    67 ~ 68

  • 69 ~ 70

    71 ~ 72

    73 ~ 75

    76 ~ 77

    78 ~ 79

    80 ~ 81

    82 ~ 83

    84 ~ 86

    87 ~ 88

    89 ~ 90

    91 ~ 92

    93 ~ 94

    95 ~ 96

    97 ~ 98

    99 ~ 100

    101 ~ 102

    103 ~ 104

    105 ~ 106

    107 ~ 108

    109 ~ 110

    111 ~ 112

    113 ~ 114

    115 ~ 116

    117 ~ 118

    119 ~ 120

    121 ~ 122

    123 ~ 124

    125 ~ 126

    127 ~ 128

    129 ~ 130

    131

    132 ~ 133

    134 ~ 135

    136 ~ 137

    138 ~ 139

    140 ~ 141

    142 ~ 143

    144 ~ 145

    Sheet1Sheet2Sheet3