Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Link to DOF microsite/presentation:
http://taxreform.dof.gov.ph/
publication/recent-presentations/
1
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Package 2+Alcohol excise tax reform
As of 20 August 2019
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Policy objectives
1. Attain better health outcomes
a. Achieve 10 percent reduction in harmful alcohol consumption by 2025
b. Reduce related diseases and hazards
2. Raise revenues for Universal Health Care
a. Sustain 100 percent PhilHealth coverage
b. Provide outpatient check-ups and medications
4
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Ten reasons why we need to raise alcohol excise tax
5
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Top 10 reasons why we need to raise alcohol excise tax
1. To finance the funding gap of the UHC;2. To reduce alcohol-related deaths from sickness;3. To reduce harmful effects of alcohol on health;4. To reduce the healthcare cost, especially for poor Filipinos;5. To reduce fatal injury and sudden deaths from alcohol consumption;6. To reduce the high prevalence of alcohol consumption, especially binge drinking;7. To protect the youth from marketing strategies that induce them to consume
more alcohol;8. To discourage consumption of unhealthy products;9. To reduce the economic cost of alcohol; and10. To rebalance the revenue sharing from 70:30 to 60:40 for tobacco and alcohol,
respectively.6
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Funding gap before the enactment of the increase in tobacco taxes (RA 11346)
7
1. To finance the funding gap of the Universal Health Care (UHC).
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Totals may not add up due to rounding.
Funding gap after the enactment of the RA 11346 and HB 1026 as amended
1. To finance the funding gap of the Universal Health Care (UHC).
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
10
UHC benefits for all Filipinos
These are some of the specific benefits that Filipinos will receive under UHC if fully implemented.
1. To finance the funding gap of the Universal Health Care (UHC).
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
13
4.7 7.2 8.7 10.3
11.4 12.6 14.2 15.2 17.2
19.7
2.6 4.7 5.1
7.0 9.7
12.1
15.8
22.1
33.8
67.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th
PH
P b
illio
ns
Decile
Unhealthy products spending (alcohol, tobacco and sweetened beverages) Medical care spendingSource: PSA, FIES 2015
The poor spend more on unhealthyproducts than on healthcare.
1. To finance the funding gap of the Universal Health Care (UHC).
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
2. To reduce alcohol-related deaths from sickness.
Sources: Global Burden of Disease Study, 2017; DOH
31
25
15
31
25
17
32
26
18
32
27
19
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
No reform HOR DOH-DOF
Tho
usa
nd
dea
ths
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
15,098 deaths can be avertedfrom harmful use of alcohol
on year 1 with DOH-DOF
44
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Worldwide, harmful use of alcohol causes:
26 percent of all mouth cancer cases11 percent of all colorectal cancer cases5 percent of all breast cancer cases7 percent of all hypertensive heart disease48 percent of all liver cirrhosis cases 26 percent of pancreatitis cases20 percent of all tuberculosis cases
Source: World Health Organization (WHO), 2018
2. To reduce alcohol-related deaths from sickness.
46
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Alcohol accounts for5 percent of the Philippines’ years of human life lost to illness, disability, and premature death.
(GBD 2010 data from Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation)
2. To reduce alcohol-related deaths from sickness.
47
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Alcohol, like tobacco, causes deaths in all age groups.
However, young people are disproportionately susceptible to risk of death from alcohol (IHME 2018).
2. To reduce alcohol-related deaths from sickness.The youth die from alcohol far more than from tobacco
48
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.Brain1. Stroke, seizures, coma and
death2. Addiction and withdrawal3. Brain shrinkage4. Learning and memory loss5. Loss of coordination6. Anxiety, depression and
personality disorders
Lungs
1. Lung infection like tuberculosis and pneumonia
2. Breathing may stop, then death
Liver
1. Cirrhosis2. Fibrosis3. Alcoholic hepatitis4. Liver failure5. Fatty liver
Pancreas1. Chronic
pancreatitis
Intestines1. Cancer2. Ulcer3. Abdominal pain,
nausea, vomiting and diarrhea
4. Inflammation, irritation and hemorrhaging
Eyes1. Blurred vision
Stomach1. Peptic ulcers2. Irritated lining and
bleeding lesions
Heart1. Cardiomyopathy
(weakens heart and muscle to pump)
2. Enlarged heart3. Irregular heart beat4. High blood pressure
Throat1. Cancer2. Irritation, bleeding
and difficulty of swallowing
Mouth1. Risk of cancer2. Slurred speech
Reproductive system1. Impotence in men2. Infertility, early
menopause and menstrual irregularity in women
Bones1. Early onset of
osteoporosis
Muscles1. Weak and soft
muscles
3. To reduce harmful effects of alcohol on health.
33 major disease categories
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
4. To reduce the healthcare cost,especially for poor Filipinos.
Liver cancer drugs PHP million per treatment
Pembrolizumab 3.2
Regorafenib 2.7
Sorafenib 1.6
Source: DOH
Liver transplants PHP million per treatment
National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI)
1.5 to 2.5
Private hospitals 3 to 4
51
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
PhilHealth claims due to alcohol is PHP 68 million per year.
At 42 percent support value of PhilHealth, actual hospital cost is around PHP 162 million.
This means out-of-pocket cost of sick people can reach PHP 94 million, an amount the poor cannot afford.Source: PhilHealth
4. To reduce the healthcare cost,especially for poor Filipinos.
53
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Alcohol consumption is also widely considered as risk factor for intimate partner violence and sexually transmitted infections (National Institute on Drug Abuse 2015).
Sexually transmitted infections [STIs] include HIV, which are already at epidemic rate in the Philippines (DOH 2016).
4. To reduce the healthcare cost,especially for poor Filipinos.
55
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
5. To reduce fatal injury and sudden deaths from alcohol consumption.
Source: Department of Health Online National Electronic Injury Surveillance System
Particulars 2016 2017 2018 Total
Road accidents (fatal and non-fatal)
2,562 4,599 3,211 10,372
Injuries incurred from violence in relation to alcohol intake
1,408 1,560 535 3,503
Injury cases from drowning while in the influence of alcohol
5 9 4 18
56
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Socio-economic costs of road accidents
PHP 5.9 million is lost per fatal road accident, of
which:
1. PHP 4.3 million (73 percent) is lost labor output;
2. PHP 861,395 (15 percent) is social cost of pain,
grief, and suffering;
3. PHP 431,024 (8 percent) is medical cost;
4. PHP 305,968 (5 percent) is funeral, property
damage, and administration costs.
Adjusted for inflationSource: De Leon, Mark Richmund M., Primitivo C. Cal and Ricardo G. Sigua. 2005. “Estimation of socio-economic cost of road accidents in Metro Manila.” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol. 6, pp. 3183 – 3198
5. To reduce fatal injury and sudden deaths from alcohol consumption.
Up to PHP 19.0 billion in social cost.
58
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
More women experience physical violence from husbands who consume alcohol.
Source: Department of Health, 2019
Husband's alcohol consumptionNumber of women
2008 2013 2017
Does not drink 1,504 1,678 4,098
Drinks 4,859 4,953 6,705
Gets drunk very often 546 528 754
5. To reduce fatal injury and sudden deaths from alcohol consumption.
59
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
6. To reduce the high prevalence of alcohol consumption…
RA 8424 RA 9334Global
Financial Crisis
RA 10351
60
RA 10963
8.2 8.510.8
15.7
19.8
24.5
30.6
53.0
26.9
48.2
44.9
46.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1998 2003 2008 2013 2015 2018
Perc
ent
PH
P
Effective tax rate Drinking prevalence
Sources: Effective tax rate data from the Department of Finance; and drinking prevalence data from Food and Nutrition Research Institute
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
6. …as well as binge drinking among adults.
56.2 54.9 55.760.8
58.5
64.4
37.841.1
31.0
0
25
50
75
2013 2015 2018*
Perc
ent
Prevalence of binge drinking amongcurrent adult drinkers aged 20-59 years old
All Male Female
Source: FNRI Clinical and Health Survey - 2008, 2015, 2018**Based on preliminary reports, no official report released yet**Standard drink generally has a net alcohol content of 10 grams of ethanol (depending on the country or site).
61
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
6. …and among the poorest current adult drinkers.
62
54.2 54.3
60.653.2
49 48.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2013 2015 2018
Perc
ent
Prevalence of binge drinking among poorest andrichest current adult drinkers aged 20-59 years old
Poorest RichestNote: The poorest and richest belong to the first and fifth quintile, respectively.Source: FNRI Clinical and Health Survey - 2008, 2015, 2018**Based on preliminary reports, no official report released yet**Standard drink generally has a net alcohol content of 10 grams of ethanol (depending on the country or site).
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Note: The poorest belong to the first wealth quintile.Source: FNRI Clinical and Health Survey - 2008, 2015, 2018**Based on preliminary reports, no official report released yet**Standard drink generally has a net alcohol content of 10 grams of ethanol (depending on the country or site).
6. …and among the poorest current adult drinkers.
63
46.4
38.7
40.3
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
2013 2015 2018
Perc
ent
Prevalence of current drinkers amongpoorest adults aged 20-59 years old
54.2 54.3
60.6
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
2013 2015 2018
Perc
ent
Prevalence of binge drinking among poorest current adult drinkers
aged 20-59 years old
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
7. To protect the youth from marketing strategies that induces them to consume more alcohol.
Some supermarkets even display alcopops next to regular fruit juices.
Taken on July 24, 2019 around 12nn at Puregold, San Andres, Manila
65
Taken on August 17, 2019 around 7:30 pm at Robinson’s Manila
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
7. To protect the youth from marketing strategies that induces them to consume more alcohol.
Enticing packaging to the youth (with straw!)66
Retrieved at Gaz Cocktail’s Instagram page (www.instagram.com/gazcocktail) on 17 August 2019 at 8:30 pm.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
7. To protect the youth from marketing strategies that induces them to consume more alcohol.
67
Packaging is intended to mislead consumers.
Retrieved at Gaz Cocktail’s Instagram page (www.instagram.com/gazcocktail) on 17 August 2019 at 8:30 pm.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5 percentSuggested Retail Price: PHP 34.00Content: 320 mL
Alcohol by volume (ABV): 7 percentSuggested Retail Price: PHP 25.00Content: 200 mL
…and also more affordable than a bottle of beer.
70
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Price promotions, sponsorships, online competitions,including company websites, social networking sites, and Youtube
72
7. To protect the youth from marketing strategiesthat induce them to consume more alcohol.
Source: Gaz Cocktail’s Instagram page
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Source: Bureau of Internal Revenue
Increasing alcohol consumption indicates thatthere is room for further excise tax increases.
4
11 13 14 14 16 17
287
371 416 398 408
441 458
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Collection (PHP billion)
Removals (Million proof liters)
19 22 25 28 35
43 50
1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4
1.6 1.8
2.0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Collection (PHP billion)
Removals (Billion liters)
26 34 39
53 48 63
73
1.2 1.1 1.2
1.6 1.4
1.8 2.0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Collection (PHP million)
Removals (Million gauge liters)
Distilled spiritsFermented liquors Wines
34 29 27
58
30
69
1.2 1.0
0.8
1.6
0.9
1.8
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Collection (PHP million)
Removals (Million proof liters)
Alcopops
8. To discourage consumption of unhealthy products.
73
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
83.3 83.5 84.4 83.5 80.5 79.2 82.3 83.5 83.5 78.465.8 64.4 65.9 69.1 70.5 71.6
16.7 16.5 15.6 16.5 19.4 20.7 17.5 16.4 16.420.6
33.3 34.7 33.1 29.9 28.1 27.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Perc
ent
Excise tax collection from alcohol products(Percent distribution)
Fermented liquors Distilled spirits WinesNote: 2017 Includes deficiency excise tax collected from Mighty Corporation amounting to P3,484,451,686.02
2018 Includes TRAIN incremental revenue for tobacco2003-2012 Collections based BIR Collection per GFS Classification (Cash Collection)2013-2018 Excise Tax Cash Collections based on Certifications submitted by BIR and BOC
8. To discourage consumption of unhealthy products.
74
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
On a per capita basis, Filipinos consume more distilled spirits than the rest of the world in 2017.
76
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Philippines Asia-Pacific Global
Tho
usa
nd
mill
ilite
rs
Brandy Gin & genever Liqueurs Rum Specialty spirits Tequila & mescal Vodka Whiskey
11.0
9.3
8.0
Source: GlobalData. “Country profile: Spirits in the Philippines”. 2018.
8. To discourage consumption of unhealthy products.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
8. To discourage consumption of unhealthy products.
78
0.27
0.64 0.68 0.72 0.77
1.11 1.15
1.68
2.11
0
1
2
3
Saigon Beer Red Horse/SanMiguel
Red Horse/SanMiguel (HB
1026)
Red Horse/SanMiguel (DOH-
DOF)
Beer Lao Singha Beer Bintang Carlsberg Tiger Beer
Vietnam Philippines Philippines Philippines Laos Thailand Indonesia Malaysia Singapore
U.S
. do
llars
Comparative price of popular beers(330 ml cans) in ASEAN
Using 2018 CPI and FOREX2019 prices from various online sources
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
9.711.7
21.7
24.627.3
40.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
China Philippines Hongkong Indonesia Thailand Singapore
U.S
. do
llars
Source: GlobalBrandPrices.com 2017
Comparative prices of Gordon’sLondon dry gin (700 ml) in ASEAN
8. To discourage consumption of unhealthy products.
81
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
9. To reduce the economic cost of alcohol:
PHP 211 billion to the economy by 2020
190.8211.2
232.7256.8
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2019 2020 2021 2022P
HP
bill
ion
Economic cost
Sources: DBCC, July 2018; Rehm, 2009
Economic cost of alcohol is estimated at over one percent of GDP for middle income countries like the Philippines.
83
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
10. To rebalance the revenue sharing from 70:30 to 60:40 for tobacco and alcohol, respectively.
59%
41%
2010
Tobacco Alcohol
70%
30%
2015
Tobacco Alcohol
58%
42%
2020
Tobacco Alcohol
88
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
The proposed reform on alcohol excise tax
90
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
DOH-DOF proposal key features
Distilled spirits Fermented liquors Wines
1. Maintain the structure of having specific tax per liter.
2. Increase the unitary specific tax following the schedule.
3. Increase the indexation rate of the specific tax to 10 percent.
4. Remove the distinction of fermented liquors brewed and sold at microbreweries.
5. Tax alcopops as fermented liquors since they are marketed as beer substitute.
1. Maintain the structure of having both ad valorem and specific tax per proof liter.
2. Increase the ad valorem tax rate from 20 to 25 percent.
3. Increase the unitary specific tax following the schedule.
4. Increase the indexation rate of the specific tax to 10 percent.
1. Maintain the structure:• For sparkling wines, maintain the
two-tiered tax structure, based on net retail price.
• For still wines and carbonated wines, maintain the three-tiered specific tax, based on alcohol by volume.
• For fortified wines, maintain the tax as distilled spirits
2. Increase the specific tax following the schedule.
3. Increase the indexation rate of the specific tax to 10 percent. 91
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Specific excise tax rates (PHP per liter)of fermented liquors (e.g., beer)
92
25
4045
5055
61
35
0
20
40
60
80
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
PH
P
DOH-DOF
Fermented liquors other than brewed
Brewed and sold at microbreweries
25
32 34 3639
41
35
0
20
40
60
80
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
PH
P
HB 1026
Fermented liquors other than brewed
Brewed and sold at microbreweries
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Excise tax rates of alcopopsDOH-DOF
23
3234
3639
41
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Perc
ent
PH
P
Specific Ad valorem
HB 1026
93
23
40
45
50
55
6120
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Pe
rcen
t
PH
P
Specific Ad valorem
For 2019, alcopops are taxed as distilled spirits with specific tax rate of PHP 22 per liter and ad valorem rate of 20 percent. Starting 2020, they will be taxed as fermented liquor with specific rate on a volume basis.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Specific excise tax rates (PHP per proof liter) of distilled spirits (e.g., brandy, rum, whiskey, vodka, and gin)
23
40
45
5055
61
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
PH
P
DOH-DOF
23
35
40
4548
52
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024P
HP
HB 1026
94
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Ad valorem excise tax rates (NRP per proof) of distilled spirits (e.g., brandy, rum, whiskey, vodka, and gin)
DOH-DOF HB 1026
20
25 25 25 25 25
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Perc
ent
2022 22 22 22 22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Pe
rcen
t
95
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Preliminary estimates. Totals may not add up due to rounding.
DOH-DOF 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Fermented liquors 24.7 31.4 37.8 44.0 50.8 188.8
Alcopops 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 2.7
Distilled spirits 8.2 9.8 11.4 12.9 14.5 56.7
Wines 0.04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8
Total 33.3 41.8 49.9 57.7 66.3 249.0
Estimated incremental revenue (PHP billions)
HB 1026 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
Fermented liquors 10.3 12.0 13.5 15.8 18.4 70.0
Alcopops 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.9
Distilled spirits 5.2 6.8 8.4 9.2 10.0 39.5
Wines 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 4.0
Total 16.6 19.9 23.0 26.2 29.7 115.498
Preliminary estimates. Totals may not add up due to rounding.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
100
To finance the funding gap of the Universal Health Care (UHC).
Totals may not add up due to rounding.
Funding gap after the enactment of the increase in tobacco taxes (RA 11346)
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Cross country comparison
101
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Multi-tiered
Unitary
Excise tax structure of
fermented liquors among
ASEAN countries
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Multi-tiered
Unitary
Excise tax structure of
distilled spirits among
ASEAN countries
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Multi-tiered
Unitary
Excise tax structure of
wines among ASEAN
countries
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Excise tax structure of
fermented liquors
among ASEAN countries
Specific (liter)
Specific (proof liter)
Ad valorem
Mixed
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Specific (liter)
Specific (proof liter)
Ad valorem
Mixed
Excise tax structure of
distilled spirits among
ASEAN countries
106
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Excise tax structure of
wines among
ASEAN countries
Specific (liter)
Specific (proof liter)
Ad valorem
Mixed
107
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Impact on prices
108
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Fermented liquors
Red Horse Beer/1000 mlManufacturer: San Miguel BreweryAlcohol content: 6.8 percentProof: 13.6 percent Proof liter: 13.6 percentNet retail price: PHP 51.16
2020 (no reform) 2020 (with reform)
PHP
SRP 86.90Excise 26.43
PHP
93.14 HB 1026
Excise: 32.00
102.10 DOH-DOF
Excise: 40.00
109
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Alcopops
Gaz/200mlManufacturer: Destilleria Limtuaco, Inc.Alcohol content: 7.0 percentProof: 14.0 percentProof liter: 2.8 percentNRP: PHP 21.08
2020 (No reform) 2020 (With reform)
PHP
SRP 25.03Total excise 1.27
PHP
30.78 HB 1026
Excise: 6.40
32.57 DOH-DOF
Excise: 8.00
111
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Distilled spirits
Emperador Light (brandy)/750mlManufacturer: Emperador Distillers, Inc (EDI)Alcohol content: 27.5 percentProof: 55.0 percentProof liter: 41.3 percentNRP: PHP 66.07
2020 (No reform) 2020 (With reform)
PHP
SRP 93.38Total excise 17.30
PHP
99.12 HB 1026
Excise: 22.43
102.65 DOH-DOF
Excise: 25.58114
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Responding to 10 concerns of stakeholders
115
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Responding to 10 concerns of stakeholders
1. The current tax structure is not fair because there are different tax rates for different alcohol products
2. A multi-tiered tax system based on net retail price (NRP) is more equitable than a unitary tax system.
3. Higher excise taxes will increase smuggling and illicit trade of alcohol.
4. Higher excise taxes will lead to job losses in the alcohol industry, and increase inflation.
5. Higher taxes can hurt the alcohol industry as well as the economy.
6. Higher excise taxes are regressive.
7. Alcohol taxes have a heavier burden on lower income groups.
8. Increasing alcohol excise will just make people shift to drugs.
9. Drinking alcohol is a coping mechanism, part of our culture, or a recreational activity which should not be taxed.
10. Increasing taxes will not change the behavior of current drinkers.116
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
1. The current tax structure is not fair because there are different tax rates for different alcohol products.
A. The 15th Congress, in its wisdom, legislated the current tax structure in the Sin Tax Reform to address weaknesses in the previous excise tax regime.
B. The ad valorem tax of spirits makes its taxation more equitable because of the wide price range across products.
C. The specific tax based on alcohol content of spirits help mitigate the risk of high-dose alcohol consumption.
D. The simpler specific tax on fermented liquor is due to its similar tax burden and alcohol content.
CONCERN 1 RESPONSE
117
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
2. A multi-tiered tax system based on net retail price (NRP) is more equitable than a unitary tax system.
A. A multi-tiered structure based on NRP does not discourage consumption.
B. It only works to encourage downward shifting to cheaper variants.
CONCERN 2 RESPONSE
119
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
3. Higher excise taxes will increase smuggling and illicit trade of alcohol.
A. Higher taxes are not the primary determinant of high levels of illicit trade in a country.
B. It is determined by the level of governance and enforcement.
C. This can be addressed by strengthening tax administration.
CONCERN 3 RESPONSE
121
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
4. Higher excise taxes will lead to job losses in the alcohol industry, and increase inflation.
A. The 2012 sin tax reform shows a slight decrease in employment in alcohol manufacturers but this quickly recovered in the following years since demand increased due to higher income of people.
CONCERN 4 RESPONSE
ParticularsEmployment in
distilling (spirits)Employment in
fermenting (beer)
2010 1,342 3,631
2013 1,066 3,888
2014 665 3,888
2015 1,340 4,087-40
0
40
80
120
2013 2014 2015
Pe
rce
nt
Growth rate of alcohol industry employment
Distilling, rectifying and blending of spirits
Manufacture of malt liquors and maltSource: ASPBI 123
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
5. Higher taxes can hurt the alcohol industry as well as the economy, and increase inflation.
A. Historical data show that higher excise taxes do not hurt the economy. Despite the sin tax reform in 2013, revenues of alcohol firms continued to grow.
B. Inflation impact is additional 0.12 percentage points only.
CONCERN 5 RESPONSE
0
40
80
120
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
PH
P b
illio
ns
Revenues of top alcohol companies in (in PHP billion)
San Miguel Brewery Inc. Asia Brewery Inc
Emperador Disillers Inc. Ginebra San Miguel Inc
Tanduay Distillers Inc Destileria Limtuaco and Company, Inc.
Source: SEC125
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
6. Higher excise taxes are regressive.
A. Sin products are equally dangerous to health regardless of socioeconomic status.
B. This regressive tax is really meant to help the poor stop consuming alcohol products.
CONCERN 6 RESPONSE
128
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
7. Alcohol taxes have a heavier burden on lower income groups.
A. According to the WHO, the harms caused by alcohol consumption (per liter) is greater for the poor than the rich, especially since the poor has little access to healthcare.
CONCERN 7 RESPONSE
130
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
8. Increasing alcohol excise will just make people shift to drugs.
A. Studies show that those who drink are more likely to smoke and use illegal drugs.
B. By increasing alcohol excise tax, we can reduce the consumption of all three unhealthy products.
CONCERN 8 RESPONSE
132
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
9. Drinking alcohol is a coping mechanism, part of our culture, or a recreational activity which should not be taxed.
A. Our proposal is not prohibiting the consumption of alcohol, rather, it is discouraging harmful consumption as it is linked to negative health and social effects.
B. It is also discouraging binge drinking among the youth, who faces the highest risk.
CONCERN 9 RESPONSE
133
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
10. Increasing taxes will not change the behavior of current drinkers.
A. Increasing alcohol excise taxes will reduce accessibility of alcohol, especially among the youth and poor, who are the most price-sensitive and faces highest risk.
B. This will result in less health and social issues linked with alcohol consumption.
CONCERN 10 RESPONSE
134
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Summary
136
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
1. Ensure financial sustainability for health expenditure programs
Reforming alcohol taxation is a sustainable financing source for the full implementation of the UHC law.
The DOH and DOF proposed alcohol reform will result in an additional PHP 249 billion over the next five years.
137
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
2. Discourage excessive alcohol consumption for better health and social outcomes…
With the DOH and DOF proposal, the consumption of spirits, beer, and wine will be reduced by 18.3 percent, 20.6 percent, and 4.7 percent, respectively, after a four year implementation.
138
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
3. …and significant number of lives saved.
Consequently, this reform will result in almost 57,000 lives saved between 2020 and 2024.
Source: Salvador, Dante, Michael Mo and Reneepearl Kim Sales. n.d. “Simulating the health impact of updating alcohol tax rates in the Philippines.” Department of Health, Philippines.
140
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
4. Ensure a healthy, world class workforce needed to support our transition to a high income country status.
This alcohol excise tax reform is both a revenue and a health measure that will allow us to achieve a healthy world class workforce, capitalizing on our demographic dividend that most other countries do not have.
141
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Link to DOF microsite/presentation:
http://taxreform.dof.gov.ph/
publication/recent-presentations/
142
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Thank you.