Linear Non

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/22/2019 Linear Non

    1/2

    Linear and non-linear learningWhat is linear learning?Some aspects of our educational system reflect its machine-age origins. If you look closely you will see the ethos of the factory: The textbooks, the curricula,the classrooms, and the schedules we follow. These are products of a 19th century factory model.They havent changed much over the centuries. To this day, the bell rings and we take our places for 45 mins of instruction in neat rows. Then we receive mass-produced content that was designed around standardized tests tests that do not accommodate individual learning needs.The delivery model is that of the conveyor-belt. If the system is to work as a whole, the content has to be delivered in a very particular way: It has to be delivered in a linear format.Textbook exampleYou can see the linear format at work in textbooks that stagger information: Inmost textbooks youre not supposed to proceed to Unit 2 until youve learned Unit 1.Nor will you will understand Unit 3 until you have mastered Unit 2, and so on. Almost all textbooks are designed, literally, along such lines.Let me give you an example from English language textbooks. For decades, they have traditionally begun with present tense (or aspect) verbs and usually with the3rd person. He goes, and she eats, etc. These are commonly the first item in along and linear sequence of items.From there, the books invariably proceed to simple past tense, then past continuous, and then on to the perfect aspect, and so on. This is the order in which mo

    st newcomers to English meet the language. Its also an example of linear delivery.Linear is arbitraryThe striking thing about the linear approach is how arbitrary it is. The sequences of language items I mentioned have nothing to do with how and when learners actually acquire the elements - still less to do with what they would encounter in the wild. The linear sequence is arbitrary.Its also the case that, in real life (and even in school life) learners of spokenEnglish do not acquire the very first item of the entire sequence the simple present tense - until they reach an advanced stage of fluency. The first will be last and theres nothing the textbook writer can do about this.So, its interesting that Chinese speakers of English who have mastered many complex grammatical items continue to say he go rather than he goes. For some reason th

    third persona singulars is a late acquired morpheme in some cases very late. Again, this is the direct opposite of what textbook order suggests.ExpediencyThe textbook sequence of items exists for reasons other than a natural order oflearning. Its presented out of an order of teaching expediency. This qualifies aswhat we might call a teacher-centric approach.One assumption behind the linear approach is, of course, that if it is taught then the learning will follow, regardless of any natural order of acquisition. Thatis problematic, to say the least.Non-linear learningSo, what is non-linear learning? On one level, non-linear learning is the way that we naturally learned for a couple of hundred thousand years. In nature, linear learning doesnt exist. People didnt learn to swim or hunt in a linear way throug

    h a staggered, textbook process. We learned instead by doing, through direct experience, through dealing with things as they arose, and through discovering whatit was that was important at the time. But most of all, we learned through making connections between stuff we already knew and the stuff we didnt. This meantwe actively constructed the knowledge as we needed it. It was all very subjective and individual and not linear.In real life, children learn their mother tongue through random exposure. They make sense of the language by identifying patterns and they connect and store thepatterns that work. Our brains are designed to work/learn this way, but it is asubjective process because each individual experiences distinct social and psyc

  • 8/22/2019 Linear Non

    2/2

    hological phenomena. It is not an objective one size fit, but an experience thatis entirely unique. Yet we all end up fluent in our native language.Learning in the natural environment was not linear. There is a level on which itwas actually quite random. It was situational.Networks, not linesIf anything, non-linear learning has more to do with a network than a line. Its about experience and connecting the dots in our distant past that meant remembering that a certain plant could be eaten, another could heal illness, while others should be avoided, etc.This type of learning has a neurological basis: Our neural networks form the basis of memory/knowledge and even the brain itself. The web, like the brain, is all about links and nodes. Its network qualities have massive implications for learning that I think were just beginning to see. The rise of the web has meant therise of a certain type of learning and its based on a network of connections rather than on linear sequences.This doesnt mean we have to put an end to linear learning far from it but it doesmean we have to be open to other possibilities, and the web is providing those.Networks are everywhere and, as Jay Cross persuasively argues, they are changing everything, including how we learn. The last time that happened we had the Enlightenment on our hands.Writing techniques: Learning to write in a non-linear wayThrough recent work on a writing program for professionals, Ive once again seen the limitations of the grammar-book and the linear approach.The problem with the to z books on writing is that they suppress all context. W

    hich means that each learner is forced to follow the book and jump through the same hoops, regardless of different needs?If todays lesson happens to be on the split infinitive then the split infinitive itis and thats what we do end of discussion. As a learner, it means that the content has nothing to do with your life, your experience, or with anything you mightactually want to learn. The effect is one-size-fits-nobody.In order to combat the linearity problem, Ive developed an approach that I call writing techniques. With writing techniques the learner is encouraged to developfirst, her own interpretation of good writing. She is guided in how to close readthe texts to see the techniques below the surface that make it effective and sheis presented with a number of techniques that are selected by the tutor as highly effective .With enough skill in place to be able to make judgment calls, the learner is the

    n encouraged to close read her own writing and find the gaps. The task then becomes to find out how acknowledged writers (from Gladwell to Chekov) solve his problems and learn from there. This approach subjective, connectivist, and non-linear.For more on the writing techniques go here.Note: I updated this post for clarity in Sept 2012.Ken Carroll