16
2012 Adult Language Group NSW Speech Pathology Evidence Based Practice Network Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic feature analysis? Revisiting a classic therapy technique

Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

2012 Adult Language Group NSW Speech Pathology Evidence Based Practice Network

Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders)

Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member

Presented by Claire Layfield

What's new for semantic feature analysis?

Revisiting a classic therapy technique

Page 2: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Semantic Feature Analysis

Aphasia is frequently associated with semantic breakdown

Semantic feature analysis is a technique that underpins the general philosophy behind many treatments for semantic impairments

Page 3: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Semantics

Object, picture or idea

purrs

cat dog rabbit

fish

barksfur pet4-legs scales

houserobinPhonological Lexicon

Phonological Buffer/ Phonemes

æ td o gk

Semantic word

retrieval impairment

Slide modified with thanks to Lyndsey Nickels

Page 4: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Semantic Feature Analysis

GROUP ACTION

PROPERTIES ASSOCIATION(Boyle, 2001; Boyle, 2004; Coelho, McHugh, & Boyle, 2004; Kiran, & Johnson,2008; Kiran, 2008; Rider, Wright, Marshall & Page, 2008)

Page 5: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Semantic Feature Analysis Semantic feature analysis therapy is

provided at word level BUT our treatment goals are discourse based

Clinical Question: For people with aphasia, in what circumstances does SFA improve Naming of treated items Naming of untreated items Generalisation to spontaneous speech

Page 6: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Semantic Feature Analysis: CAPS

Initial searching by the group found 23 articles

From these 16 were CAPPED

The others were excluded because Treatment data was not available (e.g. expert

commentary) Treatment was not applicable (e.g. neuroimaging) The participants had speech and language

impairments in addition to aphasia

Page 7: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

The Evidence: Research Design

Research design Single case experimental design Case series

Low level of evidence on NHMRC evidence hierarchy.

BUT well designed single case and case series, can be more powerful in terms of clinical applicability.

Page 8: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

The Evidence: Participants

No correlation between treatment efficacy and Type of aphasia Severity of aphasia Time post onset Aetiology

Representative of the group caseload

Page 9: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

The Evidence : Intervention

Variability noted in Treatment schedules Therapy duration Individual vs group based

Variability noted in therapy administration Cueing hierarchies, prompts, responses to

errors Added components of discourse (put word into

phrase)

Page 10: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

The Evidence: Measurement

Measures included confrontational naming (typically treated

and untreated items) Standardised measures Generalisation measures typically

discourse based (CIU, words and error production rates)

Participation measures: Social validity questionnaire

Page 11: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

The Evidence: Outcomes

Treated items increased and maintained

Untreated items Similar trends but reduced in magnitude

Standardised assessments Small improvements to overall scores

Generalisation At best “modest” improvements in

discourse based measurements maintained over time

Page 12: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Applying these results to clinical practice

Semantic feature analysis Appears to be clinically feasible Increases naming, reduces perseveration, and

this transfers to conversation in the short term

What remains in question is Is this technique more beneficial than other

therapy techniques and Is there a way of combining this technique with a

second level of phrase/sentence level therapy which may generate and maintain functional communication improvements

Page 13: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Future Research

Research investigating Semantic feature analysis vs other techniques

which is controlled for therapy dosage Semantic feature analysis in group vs individual

settings Systematic investigation of enhancing

maintenance and generalisation Outcomes from acute and chronic phases of

therapy would all be helpful to determine the extent

and nature of the therapy benefits reported in the literature to date

Page 14: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

Questions???

Digs holes in new lawn

Barks in the

middle of the night

Best FriendJumps to get clean clothes off the

line

Steals shoes

and chews them

Target = Ruby

Page 15: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

References Antonucci, S. M. (2009). Use of semantic feature analysis in group aphasia treatment. Aphasiology, 23(7-8), 854-866. Boyle, M. (2001). Semantic Feature Analysis: The Evidence for Treating Lexical Impairments in Aphasia. . Perspectives on

Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 11, 23-28. Boyle, M. (2004). Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language

Pathology, 13(3), 236-249. Boyle, M. (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: What's in a name? Topics in Stroke

Rehabilitation, 17(6), 411-422. Boyle, M. (2011). Discourse treatment for word retrieval impairment in aphasia: The story so far. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1308-1326. Boyle, M., & Coelho, C. A. (1995). Application of Semantic Feature Analysis as a Treatment for Aphasic Dysnomia. American Journal of

Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 94-98. Cermak, L. S., Stiassny, D., & Uhly, B. (1984). Reconstructive Retrieval Deficits in Broca's Aphasia. Brain and Language, 21(1), 95-104. Coelho, C. A., McHugh, R. E., & Boyle, M. (2000). Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication.

Aphasiology, 14(2), 133-142. Conley, A., & Coelho, C. A. (2003). Treatment of word retrieval impairment in chronic Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology, 17(3), 203-211. Davis, L. A., & Stanton, S. T. (2005). Semantic feature analysis as a functional therapy tool. Contemporary Issues in Communication

Science & Disorders, 32, 85-92. Falconer, C., & Antonucci, S. M. (2012). Use of semantic feature analysis in group discourse treatment for aphasia: Extension and

expansion. Aphasiology, 26(1), 64-82. Hashimoto, N., & Frome, A. (2011). The use of a modified semantic features analysis approach in aphasia. Journal of Communication

Disorders, 44(4), 459-469. Kiran, S., Ntourou, K., Eubanks, M., & Shamapant, S. (2005). Typicality of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia: Further evidence for

the semantic complexity effect. Brain and Language, 95(1 SPEC. ISS.), 178-180. Kiran, S., & Roberts, P. M. (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment in spanish-english and french-english bilingual aphasia.

Aphasiology, 24(2), 231-261.

Page 16: Linda Jones, Julia Murphy and Claire Layfield (Group Co-Leaders) Lyndsey Nickels - Academic Member Presented by Claire Layfield What's new for semantic

References Kiran, S., & Viswanathan, M. (2008). Effect of model-based treatment on oral reading abilities in severe alexia: a case study. Journal of

Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 43-59. Law, S.-P., Wong, W., Sung, F., & Hon, J. (2006). A study of semantic treatment of three Chinese anomic patients. Neuropsychological

Rehabilitation, 16(6), 601-629. Law, S. P., Yeung, O., & Chiu, K. M. Y. (2008). Treatment for anomia in Chinese using an ortho-phonological cueing method. Aphasiology,

22(2), 139-163. Leonard, C., Rochon, E., & Laird, L. (2008). Treating naming impairments in aphasia: Findings from a phonological components analysis

treatment. Aphasiology, 22(9), 923-947. Lowell, S., Beeson, P. M., & Holland, A. L. (1995). The Efficacy of a Semantic Cueing Procedure on Naming Performance of Adults with

Aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 109-114. Marcotte, K., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2010). The neural correlates of semantic feature analysis in chronic aphasia: discordant patterns according

to the etiology. Seminars in speech and language, 31(1), 52-63. Marcotte, K., Damien, B., De Preaumont, M., Genereux, S., Hubert, M., & Ansaldo, A. (2010). Neural correlates of semantic feature

analysis in chronic aphasia: A multiple single-case study. Stroke, 41(7), e499. Marcotte, K., Vitali, P., Delgado, A. P., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2006). The neural correlates of therapy with semantic feature analysis in chronic

anomia: an event-related fMRI study... 44th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Victoria, British Columbia 15th-17th October 2006. Brain & Language, 99(1-2), 206-207.

Peach, R. K., & Reuter, K. A. (2010). A discourse-based approach to semantic feature analysis for the treatment of aphasic word retrieval failures. Aphasiology, 24(9), 971-990.

Rider, J. D., Wright, H. H., Marshall, R. C., & Page, J. L. (2008). Using semantic feature analysis to improve contextual discourse in adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(2), 161-172.

Rose, M., & Douglas, J. (2008). Treating a semantic word production deficit in aphasia with verbal and gesture methods. Aphasiology, 22(1), 20-41.

Viswanathan, M., & Kiran, S. (2005). Treatment for pure alexia using a model based approach: Evidence from one acute aphasic individual. Brain and Language, 95(1 SPEC. ISS.), 204-206.

Wambaugh, J. L., & Ferguson, M. (2007). Application of semantic feature analysis to retrieval of action names in aphasia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 44(3), 381-394