LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged

8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged

1/44

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HONORABLE ANDREW J . GUILFORD, JUDGE PRESIDING; COURTROOM 100

CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPTCHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN I I I ,

P l a i n t i f f ( s ) ,

v s . No. SACV 10-1573-AG(PLAx)

DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL INFORMATIONSYSTEMS INC., ET AL

Defendant(s) .

REPORTER'S DAILY TRANSCRIPT OF PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGSSANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2011

DENISE PADDOCKCSR 10199, CMRS, RMR, CRRt r ansc r ip t s@ocrecord . com

U.S. DISTRICT COURT REPORTER


2/44

A P P EA RAN C E S022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLNSACV 10 -1573 -AG(PLAx )

IN BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF:

IN BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT:

Phi l ip J BergLaw Off i ces o f Phi l ip J Berg555 Andorra Glen Cour t , Su i t e 12Lafaye t t e Hi l l , PA 19444-2531610-825-3134Fax: 610-834-7659Email : phi l jberg@gmai l .com

Orly Taitz:Law Off i ces o f Dr. Orly Ta i t z26302 La Paz, Sui te 211Miss ion Vie jo , CA 92691949-683-5411Email : dr t a i t z@yahoo .comWill iam C HaggertyFord, Walker , Hagger ty & Behar1 World Trade Ct r , 27th FloorLong Beach, CA 90831-2700562-983-2500Email : bi l [email protected] A RossBradley and Gmelich700 N Brand Blvd, 10th FloorGlendale , CA 91203-1202818-243-5200Fax: 818-243-5266Email : j ross@bglawyers .com


3/44

1234

09:49 56789

09:49 1011121314

09:49 1516171819

09502021222324

095025

022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)

SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2011THE CLERK: I tem 7, SACV 10-1573-AG(PLAx):

Char les Edward Lincoln , I I I v Dayl igh t Chemical In format ionSystems, In c . , e t a l .

MR. ROSS: Good morning, Your Honor.Jonathan Ross on b eh a l f o f Defendants Yosef Tai tz

and Dayl igh t Chemical In format ion Systems.MR. BERG: Phi l ip Berg on b e h a l f of the P l a i n t i f f ,

Char les L inco ln , s u b j e c t t o the ru l ing on my pro hac v i c e ,Your Honor.

MR. HAGGERTY: Will iam Hagger ty , Your Honor,s u b s t i t u t i n g in on b e h a l f of Lewis Br i sbo i s fo r Orly T ai t zand the Law Of f i c e s o f Orly T a i t z .

I apolog ize to th e c o u r t . The s u b s t i t u t i o n wase l ec t r o n i ca l l y f i l ed bu t no t f i l ed d i r e c t l y here wi th t h i sdepar tment , so I d o n ' t th ink t h a t you have th e s igneds u b s t i t u t i o n .

THE CLERK: We're j u s t wai t ing fo r th e e-mai lc op i e s , Judge.h is o f f i c e .

He was going to send it when he go t back to

THE COURT: A ll r i g h t .to address today .

We have a couple o f i tems

I would l i k e to address the pending p e t i t i o n fo rpro hac vice admiss ion .

I a l so want to engage in our normal schedul ing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1


4/44

1234

09:50 56789

0950 1011121314

0951 1516171819

0951 2021222324

0951 25


confe rence where we s e t a trial da te and make those kinds o fd e te rmin a t io n s .

An d before I do t h a t , I would l i ke to ask what i sth e l i k e l ih o o d t h a t t h i s w i l l cont inue to be a f ed e ra lac t ion?

Mr. Berg, t h e re was a motion to dismiss brough t

2

ag a in s t your RICO c la ims . I gran ted t h a t mot ion , but g ran tedleave to amend. I f - - if t h i s i s in f ed e ra l co u r t , onlybased on t h a t RICO c la im, it i s in f ed e ra l co u r t by a veryt h in t h read .

When I asked you about t h i s th e l a s t t ime you werehere , I must say I was very puzz led when you sa id t h e re was amal ic ious pr ose c u t i on cla im, which I th ink would have noth ingto do with f ed e ra l j u r i s d i c t i o n .

MR. BERG: You ' re r i g h t and I apolog ize ,Your Honor.

THE COURT: So what i s th e l i k e l i h o o d t h a t t h i sw i l l remain in my cour t?

MR. BERG: I f th e RICO cla im - - we have to f i l e anamended compla in t . We have two more weeks to do t h a t ,Your Honor, and I an t i c ipa te a motion to di smiss a f t e r t h a t .

I f the RICO cla im i s o u t , then we still have a casehere - - and I wasn ' t up on it l a s t t ime - - based ond iv e r s i t y , Your Honor.

Char les Lincoln r e s i d e s in Texas and th e o t h e r



5/44

1234

09:51 56789

0952 1011121314

0952 1516171819

09522021222324

095225


ac t io n s a re here i n Ca l i fo rn i a , so we would have d i v e r s i t yj u r i s d i c t i o n .

THE COURT: Any response from the defense aboutd iv e r s i t y j u r i s d i c t i o n ?

And to be hones t , l e t me say t h i s . I 'm going frommemory now, Mr. Berg, so I could be wrong. I d o n ' t th inkyour o r i g i n a l complaint a l l eg ed d iv e r s i t y . I th ink thedefense an t i c ipa ted a d i v e r s i t y cla im and kind of t a lk edabout it, even though it wasn ' t c l ea r ly s e t fo r th in yourcompla in t .

Your f a i l u r e to s e t it fo r th made me th ink t h a t wew e r e n ' t fac ing d i v e r s i t y i s s u e s .

Yes.MS. TAITZ: I d i d n ' t have a chance to i n t roduce

myself , and I 'm Orly T ai t z and I 'm r ep resen t in gAppeal ing Den t i s t ry .

3

I would l i k e to s t a t e t h a t d i v e r s i ty was no t in th ecompla in t ; it was not in the f i r s t amended complaint e i t h e r .And it came about j u s t now and I have a l ready p resen ted t h i sco u r t with evidence t h a t Mr. Lincoln ran fo r o f f i c e here inth e St a t e of Cal i fo rn i a l a s t year when he f i l ed h iscompla in t .

In or de r to run fo r o f f i ce , he had to f i l e a - - th edocument ' s showing h e ' s the permanent r e s i d en t of C a l i f o r n i a .

Ad d i t io n a l ly , he f i l ed numerous l eg a l ac t io n s as a



6/44

1234

09:53 56789

0953 1011121314

0953 1516171819

09532021222324

095425

022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)4

r e s i d e n t of C a l i f o r n i a .Thi rd , Mr. Linco ln was sanc t ioned n e a r l y a q u a r t e r

o f a mi l l i o n d o l l a r s in the s t a t e o f Texas . 150,000THE COURT: What does t h a t have to do with

d i v e r s i t y ?MS. TAITZ: His main occupa t ion i s f i l i n g t h i s type

o f l a w s u i t s . He was preventedTHE COURT: My under s tand ing o f d i v e r s i t y y o u ' r e

not f i t t i n g i n t o .

moment.

o f Texas .

MS. TAITZ: I f I - - if I can g e t leeway o f j u s t a

He i s no t a l lowed to f i l e any l a wsu i t s in th e s t a t eHis main occupa t ion i s f i l i n g l a w s u i t s , so he has

no jo b in th e s t a t e o f Texas ; he has no bus iness in th e s t a t eo f Texas . He i s not a l lowed to f i l e h is - - h is - - h is on lyoccupa t ion i s f i l i n g t he se type of f r i v o lo u s l awsu i t s . Hewas prevented

THE COURT: I gave you some leeway he r e . You ' restill not t a l k i n g d i v e r s i t y to me. You ' re t a l k i n g a l l s o r t so f o th e r t h i n g s , but t h a t l a s t little b i t o f in format ionisn't he lp ing me in a d i v e r s i t y an a l y s i s .

MS. TAITZ: For d i v e r s i t y he needs to be r e s i d e n to f th e s t a t e o f Texas . He needs to re s id e t h e re .

THE COURT: I under s tand and noth ing t h a t you sa idprovided any evidence to me a t a l l t h a t he w a s n ' t l i v i n g in



7/44

1234

09:54 56789

0954 1011121314

0954 1516171819

09542021222324

095525


Texas - - or res id ing in Texas.MS. TAITZ: His own complaint shows - -THE COURT: Now you ' re back to something t h a t ' s

r e l ev an t . The f i r s t i s su es were r e l ev an t when you weresay ing t h a t h is complaint says t h i s , bu t when you went o f f ont h a t sanct ion de a l you l o s t me on d iv e r s i t y .

Le t ' s t r y and focus he r e .MS. TAITZ: A ll I t r i e d to s t a t e i s t h a t he has no

occupa t ion in the s t a t e o f Texas because he i s not al lowed towork t he re . His only occupa t ion i s f i l i n g l aw su i t s . He wast o ld he i s not al lowed to f i l e in the s t a t e o f Texas, f ed e ra lo r s t a t e co u r t .

THE COURT: I unders t and .MS. TAITZ: But a l so , accord ing to h is compla in t ,

he has been r e s i d i n g i n Ca l i fo rn i a dur ing t h i s year .THE COURT: Okay. You sa id t h a t a t th e beginn ing

and I go t t h a t . That w i l l be very r e l ev an t to a d i v e r s i t yan a l y s i s .

So, Mr. Berg, you ' re going - - someone w i l l bef i l i n g a compla in t , an amended compla in t , and we w i l l look a tth e j u r i s d i c t i o n i s su e f i r s t . F i r s t w e ' l l look a t whetherRICO i s going to surv ive a second motion to d i sm i s s ; and, indoing t h a t , p lease under s tand two b ig cases

MR. BERG: I do under s tand them now.THE COURT: - - Iqbal/Twombly. I f you Google them



8/44

1234

09:55 56789

0955 1011121314

0955 1516171819

09562021222324

095625


you w i l l get t ens of thousands o f h i t s and t h a t ' s a l l t h a td i s t r i c t cour t s a re paying a t t e n t i o n to these days .

6

MR. BERG: Your Honor, I d id t h a t as soon as I l e f there l a s t t ime and I apolog ize .

THE COURT: W e ' l l check and see if RICO stillsurv ives and if it d o e s n ' t on th e d i v e r s i t y i s su e , w e ' l l thenhave to look a t th e d i v e r s i t y i s su e .

You've got ten a preview o f some of the th ings wemight hear on th e d iv e r s i t y i s su e .

That ' s no t before me now. I was j u s t th ink ingmaybe we would g e t some ea r ly de te rmina t ion t h a t you weregoing to s t a t e co u r t , which i s a very good co u r t ac ross th es t r e e t .

This co u r t i s very pro tec t ive o f f e d e r a lj u r i s d i c t i o n . The law r eq u i re s t h a t I be pro tec t ive o ffed e ra l j u r i s d i c t i o n .

From a f e d e r a l i s t p o in t o f view the law r eq u i re st h a t I al low s t a t e cour t s to make ru l i n g s i n mat te r s wheres t a t e co u r t s have t r a d i t i o n a l l y made ru l i n g s .

So t hose w i l l a l l be thoughts t h a t I have in mind.Okay.

ap p l i ca t i o n .Now let's t u rn t o the pro hac vice

Mr. Berg, you have f i l ed a l e t t e r on February 24th ,2011.

You ' re aware o f t h a t l e t t e r ?



9/44

1234

09:56 56789

0956 1011121314

0957 1516171819

09572021222324

095725


MR. BERG: Yes, Your Honor.THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . I - - I th ink t h a t l e t t e r i s

an ex p a r t e communicat ion and so I am not going to accep t th el e t t e r o r pay heed to th e arguments made in t h a t .

You reques ted t h a t th e l e t t e r be sea l ed if it bef i l ed . I am no t going to f i l e it. I am n o t , t h e r e f o r e ,going t o s ea l it but I am a lso no t going to read it.

I t ' s an ex pa r t e communicat ion .MR. BERG: Your Honor, on t h a t t o p i c , I th ink we

have - - a major problem has developed f u r t h e r by a f i l i n g a t7:30 t h i s morning by Orly T a i t z .

THE COURT: When I was t ak ing th e bench I heardt he re was a f i l i n g a t 7:30 . I d o n ' t know wh at ' s in it.

You might r ea l i z e , Counse l , o r maybe you d o n ' t ,t h a t 6:00 , 7:00 on Friday I 'm ge t t ing ready fo r th e hea r inghere today . Over th e weekend I 'm read ing t h in g s fo r thehea r ing here today and when I get to c o u r t on Monday morningI 'm ge t t ing ready fo r , you know, 30 d i f f e r e n t h ea r in g s , so Id id no t read what was f i l ed a t 7:30 .

How does t h a t c rea t e a problem?MR. BERG: Well , it c rea t e s a problem because

Orly T ai t z has now cont inued to do what she ' s done ongoing .In th e - - on th e pageTHE COURT: L et me ask you t h i s .MR. BERG: Yes.



10/44

1234

09:57 56789

0957 1011121314

0958 1516171819

09582021222324

095825


THE COURT: Are you d i r e c t i n g your argument towhether I should read your February 24th l e t t e r ?

That ' s th e i ssue I 'm r a i s i n g .ru l ing on t h a t .

I ' ve t o ld you my

Do you wish to address t h a t fu r ther?MR. BERG: I t probably d o e s n ' t mat ter in l i g h t of

what she f i l ed t h i s morning.THE COURT: Okay. Then I'll s t and by my ru l i n g .The l e t t e r w i l l no t be read o r cons ide red . I

cons ider it to be an ex p a r t e communicat ion.

8

I f I were to f i l e it, I would not s e a l it.not sea l it.

I would

f i l e it.

MR. BERG: Okay.THE COURT: So g ran t in g your wishes , I w i l l no tTherefore , I w i l l not sea l it and I w i l l a lso no t

cons ider it.MR. BERG: Let me - - l e t me j u s t th ink t h a t through

fo r a moment, only because o f what she f i l ed t h i s morning.I bel ieve t h a t Orly Tai tz has overstepped her

bounds and the mat ter t h a t th e ex pa r t e l e t t e r dealswith - - a mat ter t h a t i s not publ ic .pr iva te u n t i l th e mat te r i s reso lved .

It's a mat ter t h a t i s

It deals with th e d i s c ip l i n a r y proceed ings inPennsylvania .

THE COURT: Well , are th e ex i s t en ce o f the



11/44

1234

09:58 56789

0958 1011121314

0959 1516171819

09592021222324

095925


d i s c ip l i n a r y proceed ings - -MS. TAITZ: (Shakes head . )THE COURT: You d o n ' t need to shake your head,

Counsel .Are the ex i s t en ce of th e d i s c ip l i n a r y proceed ings

p r i v a t e? The ex i s t en ce i s p u b l i c .

p u b l i c .MR. BERG: Once it i s scheduled , t h a t p a r t i s

THE COURT: So th e hear ing has been scheduled .MR. BERG: Yes.THE COURT: So th e answer to my ques t ion i s , yes ,

the ex is tence o f the proceed ings a re p u b l i c .MR. BERG: Correc t .THE COURT: I s there anyth ing you d esc r ib e in your

l e t t e r o t h e r than the f a c t t h a t the p ro ceed in g ' s goingforward?

MR. BERG: No , bu t the problem - -THE COURT: Okay. But then I c a n ' t - - wh y would I

s e a l it, Counsel?Let me a lso tell you someth ing , and I would th ink

a l l of you would under s tand th e F i r s t Amendment to th eConst i tu t ion and p u b l i c access to our co u r t s , and I 'm j u s tnot i n c l i n ed to sea l t h i n g s .

I th ink it l eaves the impress ion with th e p u b l i ct h a t th e c ou r t i s doing something behind c losed doors . I


9


12/44

1234

09:59 56789

0959 1011121314

1000 1516171819

10002021222324

100025


b e l i ev e in a very open courtroom and I am not i n c l i n ed tos e a l documents unless ex t r emely good cause i s shown, and youh av en ' t shown me good cause fo r sea l i n g your l e t t e r .

MR. BERG: Okay. But , Your Honor - - now I rememberth e - -

THE COURT: We're ge t t ing o f f t r ack . Again, I wantto focus on th e motion pro hac vice and I want to focus onth e schedul ing conference .

MR. BERG: Based on t h a t and my t hought s , because Inow remember th e f u l l conten t o f t h a t l e t t e r , which goes to ar e so l u t i o n , I would l i k e it not to be read, not to be f i l ed .

THE COURT: Your l e t t e r to me?MR. BERG: To you.THE COURT: It sounds l i k e we ' re in agreement .MR. BERG: Okay.THE COURT: Done.MR. BERG: Now, th e next p a r t o f t h i s , though, i s

t h a t th e f i l i n g t h i s morning a t 7:30 - - and I happened tocheck th e docket - - Ms. Orly Tai tz has o v e r s t a t ed . Ib e l i ev e , Your Honor, and I d o n ' t have it with me. Maybe

THE COURT: Let me ask , what do the papers go to?Again, Ms. T ai t z , I d o n ' t - - it's hard fo r me to

read t h in g s f i l ed a t 7 :30 .What does the i s su e go to?MS. TAITZ: I was no t planning fo r you to



13/44

1234

10:00 56789

1000 1011121314

1000 1516171819

1001 2021222324

1001 25


read it a t 7:30 .This i s ac tua l ly in wr i t ing what I was planning to

p resen t here in co u r t . As you s t a t ed th e p a r t i e s need toprovide i n format ion in regards to the d i s c ip l i n a r y hear ing .So I provided - - I ca l l ed

THE COURT: Why d id you wai t u n t i l 7:30 to providet ha t ?

MS. TAITZ: I had to t r a v e l to Arizona . I wasmeet ing with a government - -

THE COURT: That d o e s n ' t mat t e r . This c ou r t i simpor tan t t oo .

MS. TAITZ: I was no t planning to make it - -THE REPORTER: I c a n ' t hear you very wel l .THE COURT: Why d o n ' t you s t ep to th e microphone.Step as i d e , Mr. Berg.MS. TAITZ: It was j u s t a wri t t en v ers io n o f what I

was planning to provide here , pursuan t to your o rd e r s ,Your Honor. You asked to prov ide the c ou r t wi th th e s t a t u si n format ion in regards to d i s c ip l i n a r y board hear ing ag a in s tMr. Berg in th e su p e r io r c ou r t o f Pennsy lvan ia .

THE COURT: A ll r i g h t .MS. TAITZ: I ca l l ed them and t hey provided a copy

o f the p e t i t i o n fo r d i s c ip l i n e a g a i n s t him. They providedh is answer. And as p a r t of h is answer the - - t hey a lsoprovided a sworn a f f i d a v i t by h is p a ra l eg a l , Lisa L i b e r i ,



14/44

1234

10:01 56789

1001 1011121314

1002 1516171819

10022021222324

100225


t h a t s t a t e s t h a t she i s h is p a ra l eg a l , t h a t s h e ' s beenworking with him s i nc e 2006.

The case - -THE COURT: Okay. So you f i l ed a d d i t i o n a l

i n f o r m a t ion on th e pro hac v i c e motion .MS. TAITZ: Yes, yes .THE COURT: T h a t ' s what I need to know.Mr. Berg , I 'm s o r r y to i n t e r r u p t you. I j u s t

12

wanted to see if t h i s was r e l e v a n t t o t he two mat te r s heretoday , the schedul ing conference and th e pro hac v i c e motion .

MR. BERG: I t h in k the o r de r was fo r me to supp lyda t a by l a s t week, l a s t - - I 'm so r ry - - Thursday o r Fr iday .

So first o f f , her s would be l a t e ; bu t I d o n ' tb e l i ev e you 've d i r ec t ed Ms. T ai t z to f i l e r e s pons e s .

THE COURT: Go ahead.MR. BERG: I b e l i ev e it was j u s t fo r me to f i l e a

r esponse .And what Ms. T ai t z d id , acco rd ing to an e xc e r p t o f

he r l e t t e r here - - and I t h in k , Your Honor, she hasove r s t e ppe d , because th e proceed ings I 'm t a l k i n g abou t , p a r ti s pub l i c and p a r t a re p r i v a t e - - the f a c t o f a he a r ing i sp u b l i c .

Your Honor, in th e r esponse she f i l e d t oday shesa ys , in p a r t " judge on t h i s case reques ted" - - "T a i t z ca l l edMare," M-a- r -e - - M-a- r - c -e (ph) , "Marcee Sloan and adv i sed



15/44

1234

10:02 56789

1003 1011121314

1003 1516171819

10032021222324

100325


her t h a t At torney Berg f i l ed a pro hac vice in a f ed e ra ld i s t r i c t c ou r t i n Ca l i fo rn i a and th e judge on t h i s casereques ted an update rega rd ing th e s t a tu s of the d i s c ip l i n a r yboard hear ing ag a in s t Berg."

I b e l i ev e , and I have not had t ime to check it,Your Honor - -

THE COURT: Can I sum up and say you d o n ' t b e l i ev eI should review t hose papers in de te rmin ing your pro hac viceapp l ica t ion?

MR. BERG: Yes, t h a t ' s p a r t o f it, Your Honor; bu tt h e o th e r p a r t - -

THE COURT: Okay. So t h a t ' s reques t N o . 1 .I j u s t need to know what we ' r e d i scu s s in g . You

fo lks have a tendency to unrave l in to a mi l l i o n d i f f e r e n taspec t s o f your feud with each o t h e r .

We're focus ing now on your pro hac v i c e .You say I should not read t hose papers .I w i l l cons ide r your r eq u es t .What i s th e next poin t?MR. BERG: But th e problem i s , I bel ieve - - and

w e ' l l check it fu r t h e r - - t h a t she conveyed to thed i s c ip l i n a r y board t h a t she was c a l l i n g on your b eh a l f ,Your Honor, because t hose documents t h a t were sen t to hershould not have been sen t t o her because they werec o n f i d e n t i a l documents; and I b e l i ev e if you had g o t t en them



16/44

1234

10:03 56789

1004 1011121314

1004 1516171819

10042021222324

100425


o r you had read them t h a t t hey would no t become p a r t of ther ecord because - -

THE COURT: You 've made a r e que s t t h a t I no tcons ide r the documents .to t h i s cour t?

Are you a l so making a no the r r e que s t

MR. BERG: I 'm making a r e que s t t h a t t h i s c o u r tf ind o u t how t hey go t those mat e r i a l s , because by g e t t i n gt hos e m a t e r i a l s s h e ' s no w f i l ed it and it's now allover th eIn t e rn e t . This has been pub l i s he d and it's sp read - - becauset h a t ' s what she does .

This document has been f i l e d in your case anda l r e a dy it's allover th e In t e rn e t , and I t h in k t h a t by doingt h a t she v i o l a t ed h er oa th as an a t t o r n e y because she knowsth e d i s c i p l i n a ry board proceed ings a re p r i v a t e . And a l so Ib e l i ev e she conveyed t h a t she was c a l l i n g on your b e h a l f ,Your Honor , and I would l i k e t he c ou r t to make t h a t i n q u i rybecause if she was f i l i n g on your b e h a l f I t h in k sa nc t i onsshould go ag a in s t he r .

THE COURT: I w i l l t ake t h a t r e que s t underco n s id e ra t io n .

I s th e re any th ing e l s e you would l i k e to say onyour pro hac v i c e mot ion?

MR. BERG: No. On my mot ion I submi t ted , Ib e l i ev e t h a t - - I would r e que s t t h i s c ou r t to g r a n t me prohac vice in t h i s c a s e .



17/44

1234

10:05 56789

1005 1011121314

1005 1516171819

10052021222324

100525


There i s a p u b l i c record . There i s a d i s c ip l i n a r yproceed ing pending , bu t u n t i l the mat te r i s re so lved I amstill in good s tand ing . I have been prac t i c ing law now fo r40 - - w e l l , 39 and a h a l f y ea r s , Your Honor, and I ' v e had - t h i s mat t e r i s before t h e co u r t a t t h a t t ime .

THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . Now, when you say t h a t , ana t t o rn ey can be in good s t and ing wi th the sanct ion orderst h a t have been imposed ag a in s t you?

MR. BERG: No - - yes , I am in good s tand ing .i s - - no sanct ion or de r has been ag a i n s t me in t h i sproceed ing .

There

THE COURT: Can an a t t o rn ey be in good s t and ingwhen a co u r t has sa i d , "This c ou r t has grown weary o fMr. Berg ' s cont inuous and brazen di s re spec t towards t h i sco u r t and h is own c l i e n t s . Mr. Berg ' s own ac t ions inc lud ingth e i n s t an t motion fo r r eco n s id e ra t io n se rve to d iv e r tj u d i c i a l re sources from l eg i t i ma t e mat t e r s , and t h i s c ou r tcannot in good consc ience a l low t h i s conduct to gounpubl ished"?

Now, my ques t ion i s - - it's a l eg a l ques t ion - - Id o n ' t mean to pre judge or p re load .

Can you be in good s t and ing when a judge has i s suedsuch a s ta tement?

MR. BERG: Where are you reading from? What casei s t h a t , Your Honor, if I may?



18/44

1234

10:06 56789

1006 1011121314

1006 1516171819

10062021222324

100625


THE COURT: I b e l i ev e t h a t i s the Holsworth versusBerg case ou t o f t he Eas te rn D i s t r i c t o f Pennsy lvan ia .

MR. BERG: That t h a t case has long beenr e so l ve d , Your Honor.

THE COURT: Okay. So j u s t - -MR. BERG: Okay.THE COURT: Le t ' s be c lea r : Your a nswe r ' s , "Yes,

Your Honor, I can be in good s t and ing d esp i t e t h a t order . "MR. BERG: Yes, Your Honor.THE COURT: And you can say, "Your Honor" - - you ' re

in prac t i ce fo r many decades ; along th e way a judge mightsanct ion you and t h a t does not make you not in good s tand ing .

I 'm j u s t asking t h a t ques t ion and I t h in k I j u s tgave your answer.

MR. BERG: Yes.THE COURT: Okay. A ll r i g h t .Anything e l se , t hen , on the good s tand ing i s sue?And a lso the way you j u s t phrased your answer a few

moments ago, it - - a re you conceding t h a t it's poss ib lefo l lowing t h i s d i s c ip l i n a r y mat te r you would not be in goods t and ing?

MR. BERG: No.THE COURT: T h a t ' s not p o ss ib l e?MR. BERG: I guess it's p o ss i b l e .THE COURT: Well , if th e ru l ing goes ag a in s t you,



19/44

1234

10:07 56789

1007 1011121314

1007 1516171819

10072021222324

100725


you would t hen no t be in good s t and ing because you would thenno t be a l lowed to p r a c t i c e ; r i g h t ?

MR. BERG: Well , if the ru l in g would go ag a in s t me,then t h e r e i s a whole - - t h e r e ' s a whole - - remember, in t h i sUni ted S t a t e s o f America you ' r e innocent u n t i l proven g u i l t y .T he r e ' s a pr oc e s s . That would be a he a r i ng . Af t e r t h a thear ing t h e r e ' s an appea l pr oc e s s and t hen t h e r e i s a no the rappea l pr oc e s s .

THE COURT: Okay. L et me ask you t h i s - - I'lll e a ve it a t t h a t .

MR. BERG: Your honor - - and u n t i l th e f i n a l appeali s over , t h e r e ' s - - no ac t io n i s t a ke n .

THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . I s your c l i e n t here inc o u r t today?

MR. BERG: No, he i s no t .THE COURT: Okay, t h a t ' s f i n e . C l i en t s d o n ' t need

to be here in co u r t .MR. BERG: I had asked him to be he r e .THE COURT: Pa r t o f my concern i s my - - f r a nk l y ,

should I even be a l lowing you to make an appearance? becauseth e pro hac v i c e i s no t gr a n t e d . But I a l so t h i nk in th eUni ted S t a t e s you ' r e innocent u n t i l proven g u i l t y and so I 'ma l lowing you to make your appearances u n t i l we make a ru l in gon t h a t .

A ll r i g h t . Anyth ing e l se on th e pro hac v i c e , and



20/44

1234

10:07 56789

1008 1011121314

1008 1516171819

10082021222324

100825


th e answer i s no?MR. BERG: No.THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . L e t ' s t u rn then to th e

de f e ns e , focus ing only on th e pro hac v ice . I ' v e r ead yourpa pe r s ; t hey a re voluminous . There a re some sa nc t i on o rd e r s .

L et me ask you, can an a t t o r n e y be a member in goods t and ing and e l i g i b l e to p r a c t i c e before a c o u r t a f t e r asa nc t i on o r de r has i s sue d with those words?

MS. TAITZ: I d o n ' t know th e ru l e s of thePennsylvania Supreme Court .

THE COURT: Well , th e ru l e s o f t h i s c o u r t a re whatI j u s t s a i d . He has to be in good s t a nd i ng .

Do you t h in k it's p o ss ib l e he could be in goods t and ing a f t e r such a sa nc t i on o r de r i s i s sued?

MS. TAITZ: I 'm so r ry , Your Honor, I d o n ' t know th eanswer .

THE COURT: Okay. Good answer .MS. TAITZ: But if I might s t a t e , t he s a nc t i on

proceed ings a re open to the p u b l i c . I have ca l l ed th ed i s c i p l i n a r y board , I have t a l k e d t o t he s e c r e t a r y o f th eboard , and I t a lk ed t o t he c oo r d i na t o r . As a mat te r o f f a c t ,I asked if I can t r a v e l t o t he hear ing and t hey s a i d , yes , iti s open to th e p u b l i c .

So Mr. B e r g ' s s t a t e m e n t t h a t t h i s i s n o t open, it'sno t t r u e .



21/44

1234

10:09 56789

1009 1 0

11121314

1009 1516171819

10102021222324

101025


They pos t e d on th e Webs i t e an announcement t h a tt h e r e i s a hear ing by th e d i s c i p l i n a r y board .

19

I have c a l l e d , I have s t a t e d t h a t Mr. Berg - wha t ' s w r i t t en in th e papers - - asked fo r pro hac v i c e . Thejudge on th e case wants to know th e s t a t u s o f th e case andshe has e-mai l ed me a copy of the compla in t and a copy o f h isanswer . But what i s most t ro u b l in g and what t h i s i n d iv id u a lhas done fo r the l a s t ye a r and a h a l f he i s working wi th aconvic ted document f o r ge r , a woman by th e name of - -

THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . So you b e l i ev e t h a t ifsomeone h i r e s a document f o r ge r t he y canno t be in goods t and ing to p r a c t i c e before t h e i r home s t a t e ?

T h a t ' s t he s t anda rd I 'm app ly ing he r e .MS. TAITZ: Well , t h a t ' s why t h e re a re proceed ings

ag a in s t Mr. Berg. The d i s c i p l i n a ry board of the SupremeCour t o f Pennsylvania has sugges ted from - -

THE COURT: I 'm no t he a r ing a ye s - o r - no answer tomy que s t i on .

MS. TAITZ: Well , t he y have asked t he p roba t iondepar tmen t to forward th e f i l e to them, so t h e r e i s an o ta t io n in h er f i l e t h a t it was forwarded to th e SupremeCour t o f Pennsy lvan ia . They found t h i s ou t j u s t r e c e n t l y ,and I b e l i ev e t h a t more evidence i s going to be coming andt h e r e might be more charges ag a in s t Mr. Berg wi th th ed i s c i p l i n a r y board o f Pennsy lvan ia .



22/44

1234

10: 10 56789

1011 1011121314

1011 1516171819

10 11 2021222324

10 11 25


So it i s my under s tand ing t h a t t h a t p a r t i c u l a rhear ing was pos tponed to March. They a re p rov id ing moreev idence . My under s tand ing i s t h a t h is - - t h a t t h e re w i l l besan c t io n s ag a in s t Mr. Berg and t h a t ' s why I 'm asking t h i shonorab le c ou r t not t o g ran t Mr. Berg pro hac vice u n t i l th ed i s c i p l i n a r y ac t io n ag a in s t him i s r e so l ve d .

THE COURT: Now, when you say t h a t , a re youconceding t h a t your oppos i t i on to h is pro hac vice depends ont h a t d i s c i p l i n a r y hear ing and noth ing e l s e?

MS. TAITZ: Well , t h i s - - Your Honor, you have - -THE COURT: Boy, it sure would be nice if you could

say "yes" or "no" and then g ive an e xp l a na t i on , bu t I'lll i s t e n to the e xp l a na t i on .

MS. TAITZ: Ac t ua l l y , it d o e s n ' t because he wasa l read y sanc t ioned twice by th e f ed e ra l c ou r t sys tem.

THE COURT: So it seems to me your argument shouldbe if I c a n ' t deny it based on the prev ious san c t io n s thend o n ' t g r a n t it u n t i l I hear th e r e s u l t s of th e hea r ing .

MS. TAITZ: Ac t ua l l y , t h a t might be one answer .Another answer i s you have a r i g h t to deny pro hac vice basedon the f a c t t h a t he was a l read y sanc t ioned twice .

THE COURT: You d i d n ' t hear what I s a i d .T h a t ' s ex ac t ly what I j u s t s a i d .Okay. Go ahead.Anyth ing e l se on the pro hac vice?



23/44

1234

10: 12 56789

10121011121314

10121516171819

10132021222324

101325


MS. TAITZ: J u s t to give an i dea of the l ev e l o fmalice t h a t I have exper ienced coming from Mr. Berg, not onlyhe ' s using a convic ted document fo rg e r , Lisa L i b e r i , who i scur ren t ly on probat ion u n t i l March 21s t

THE COURT: Do you t h in k when I , in t h i s co u r t ,f ind someone g u i l t y o f forging documents , it's then myr e s p o n s ib i l i t y to make sure they never ge t ano the r job?

MS. TAITZ: No, t h a t ' s not what I 'm say ing .What I 'm say ing , Your Honor, i s t h a t th e h i s t o ry of

f i l i n g s and plead ings f i l ed by Mr. Berg in a case t h a t i ssomewhat re l a t ed to t h i s in Pennsy lvan ia , shows t h a t not onlyt h i s woman was convic ted , they cont inued f i l i n g forgeddocuments of p e r ju red a f f i d a v i t s .

He i s c la iming t h a t she i s working in h is o f f i c e inPennsylvania whi le she i s on p ro b a t io n , not a l lowed to l i v et h e re i n Pennsy lvan ia . According to the terms of he rp ro b a t io n , t h i s woman can r e s i d e only i n Ca l i fo rn i a o rNew Mexico and she had to f i l e an a f f i d a v i t with th ed i s c ip l i n a r y board saying t h a t she i s r i g h t there inPennsylvania working in h is o f f i ce . And t h a t i s re l a t ed to ap r i o r case where there was misconduct by him and he i s usingher to s o r t o f suppor t h is p o i n t .

So it's no t only t h a t t h i s woman was convic ted o fforge ry b efo re . This i s an ongoing conduct t h a t i sg re a t l y - - g re a t l y undermines t h e co u r t and t h a t caused



24/44

1234

10: 13 56789

10131011121314

10141516171819

10142021222324

101425


enormous emot ional d i s t r e s s and f i n an c i a l damages to a l o t o fpe op le .

THE COURT: Well , b e l i ev e me, t h i s c ou r t i s ve r yf i rm in its oppos i t i on t o p e r j u ry and I t h i nk it's de c i s i onsr eg u l a r l y r e f l e c t t h a t ; bu t it seems to me you ' r e making a" g u i l t by assoc ia t ion" argument ; i s t h a t co r rec t ?

MS. TAITZ: No. No. I f you - -THE COURT: You ' re no t say ing Mr. Berg f i l e d those

f r a udu l e n t documents?MS. TAITZ: Yes. Yes, he d id . Mr. Berg has f i l e d

a pe r j u r e d a f f i d a v i t .THE COURT: Well , t hen what does t h a t have to do

with t h i s o th e r woman?MS. TAITZ: Well , in h is pe r j u r e d - - in h is

d i s c i p l i n a r y proceed ing a compla in t was f i l e d because hed i d n ' t answer to th e

THE COURT: So maybe I should focus on whatMr. Berg has done r a t h e r t han what someone he has h i red

MS. TAITZ: Oh, I am j u s t say ing t h a t n o t on ly hei s commit t ing p e r j u r y , he i s subo r d i na t i ng p e r j u r y by us ing adocument f o r ge r who i s concur r ing wi th him in h er sworna f f i d a v i t . Both o f them have f i l e d sworn a f f i d a v i t s wi th th ed i s c i p l i n a r y board o f Pennsylvania say ing t h a t , indeed , hehas responded t o h i s c l i e n t , t h a t the c l i e n t accused him o fde f r a ud ing he r , t h a t h is case was dismissed because he d i d n ' t



25/44

1234

10: 14 56789

10151011121314

10151516171819

10152021222324

101525


f i l e proper motion and t h a t he def rauded her and fo r a yearkep t l y in g t o he r and t e l l i n g her t h a t the case i s going on.

THE COURT: Okay.MS. TAITZ: So he committed p e r j u ry by say ing , no,

I provided t h i s i n format ion to the c l i e n t , and he brought as t a t ement from t h i s - - from t h i s fo rg e r , t h i s woman who haste n fe lony convic t ions in fo rgery and t h e f t and i s no tal lowed to res ide in Pennsylvania , who f i l ed a s t a t ementsay ing I am h is a s s i s t a n t in h is o f f i c e , and, yes , Mr. Bergf i l ed proper documents and ca l l ed the - - th e - - th e c l i e n tand d i d n ' t do anyth ing wrong.

THE COURT: Okay. Let me ask t h i s . Mr. Berg sayst h a t you t o ld th e d i s c ip l i n a r y fo lks in Pennsylvania t h a t youwere ca l l i n g on my b eh a l f .

I s t h a t t ru e?MS. TAITZ: No, t h a t ' s not what I s a i d .THE COURT: Okay. I'll take your answer, "no."You' re denying t h a t .Let me j u s t say to a l l p a r t i e s here , please be very

ca re fu l about what you a t t r i b u t e to t h i s co u r t . You haveabso lu te F i r s t Amendment r igh t s to t a lk about t h i s case and Iwouldn ' t be su rp r i sed if on th e In t e rn e t y o u ' r e a l r ead y doingt h a t .

J u s t be very ca re fu l , p a r t i c u l a r l y when you ' ret a lk ing to fo lks l i ke d i s c ip l i n a r y boards about what you say



26/44

1

2

34

10: 15 5

6789

10161011121314

10161516171819

10162021222324

101625


about what t h i s c ou r t has done .I f I see people a re gather ing i n format ion o r us ing

miss ta tements about t h i s c ou r t to t h e i r advantage t h a t ' ssomething I 'm going to have to dea l wi th .

Do you have anyth ing fu r t h e r to say on the i s su e ofth e pro hac v ice ap p l i ca t io n ?

MS. TAITZ: Yes.THE COURT: I ' v e read a l l your papers . They ' re

ve ry thorough, very complete .You can see I ' v e tabbed them.

I ' v e read them a l l comple te ly .

Anything e l se on the pro hac vice ap p l i ca t i o n s?MS. TAITZ: Yes. Pro hac vice was no t gran ted to

Mr. Berg, and s p e c i f i c a l l y you i s sued a n o t i ce say ing youdecl ined to g ran t it and t h e re fo re the c l i e n t

THE COURT: Now I 'm confused.What pro hac v ice wasn ' t gran ted?MS. TAITZ: It was not gran ted . You s t a t ed t h a t

you d ec l in ed to g ran t u n t i l t h e re i s a hear ing , u n t i l youknow wh at ' s happening with th e d i s c ip l i n a r y board inPennsylvania .

THE COURT: Well , t h a t ' s s o r t o f what I sa i d , bu tgo ahead.

MS. TAITZ: There fore th e c l i e n t , Mr. Lincoln , wassupposed to be here in co u r t .

THE COURT: I ' v e a l ready ru led on t h a t . He need



27/44

1234

10: 16 56789

10171011121314

10171516171819

10172021222324

101725


not be here .Go ahead.MS. TAITZ: I have f i l ed one more motion .Mr. Lincoln i s ordered in contempt of cour t andTHE COURT: What ' s the motion? Is t h a t pending

before me r i g h t now?

20th.

MS. TAITZ: Yes, it was - - it was f i l e d .THE COURT: When d id you f i l e t h i s ?MS. TAITZ: I th ink it was two weeks ago on th e

THE COURT: The motion i s what?

25

MS. TAITZ: To extend $150,000 o f sanct ions ag a i n s tMr. Lincoln t h a t were assessed ag a i n s t him by the ch ie fjudge of the Western D i s t r i c t o f Texas.

THE COURT: No. I 'm not the enforcement arm fo rt h a t co u r t . I enforce my own orders .

So y o u ' l l have to go back to t h a t co u r t .A ll r i g h t .Anything e l se on the motion pro hac vice?MR. HAGGERTY: No, Your Honor.MR. BERG: Ju s t a b r i e f response .Ms. Tai tz was a l lud ing to fac t s t h a t d o n ' t ex i s t a t

t h i s t ime. I mean, s h e ' s t a lk ing about a document beingforged and submi t t ing documents

THE COURT: Okay.



28/44

1234

10: 17 56789

10181011121314

10181516171819

10182021222324

101825


MR. BERG: Thank you.THE COURT: L et me ask t h i s .I 'm t roub led by g e t t i n g f i l i n g s a t 7:30 i n the

morning and Ms. T ai t z t a l k i n g about t h i s motion and t h a tmot ion .

26

What would the p a r t i e s th ink if I i s sued an or de rt h a t you need to seek l eave o f t h i s co u r t before you f i l ed adocument?

Do you have anyth ing to say about t h a t , Mr. Berg?MR. BERG: I would encourage t h a t .THE COURT: A ll r i g h t .And, Ms. T a i t z , o r any defendant?MR. ROSS: Yes, Your Honor.Jonathan Ross on b eh a l f o f Defendant Yosef T ai t z

and Dayl igh t Chemical .THE COURT: Do you under s tand what I 'm cons ide r ing

to propose? We're now here a t a schedul ing conferencede te rmin ing how t h i s case w i l l p ro g res s .

The volume o f documents , r i g h t and l e f t , i nc l ud i nga t 7:30 t h i s morning, make it d i f f i c u l t fo r the co u r t to keepup. I f ind some of t he documents unnecessa ry .

What about an or de r t h a t you must f i r s t have l eaveo f t h i s cour t be fore you f i l e anything?

MR. ROSS: Well , Your Honor, my concern i s so le lyas to my c l i e n t s . We've only f i l ed one mot ion , th e o r i g i n a l



29/44

1234

10: 18 56789

10191011121314

10191516171819

10192021222324

101925


motion to di smiss which the co u r t gran ted o u t s id e o f onecause o f ac t io n quantum merui t , but no t as to - -

THE COURT: So you oppose t h a t idea?

27

MR. ROSS: As to my c l i e n t I oppose t h a t i d ea . Wehave not been abusive .

THE COURT: Other defendants?MS. TAITZ: I oppose because I have exper ience with

Mr. Berg in Pennsylvania where we - - I askedTHE COURT: Mr. Berg i s w i l l i n g to submit to an

o rd e r from me hold on. Hold on. That ' s anothe r littlet h in g . You have to wa i t u n t i l I f i n i s h t a l k i n g . I 'm doingmost of the l i s t en in g bu t occas iona l ly I g e t to t a l k .

Mr. Berg agreed to submit to an or de r from me t h a tt h e re w i l l be no f i l i n g s wi thout my approval .

Go ahead .MS. TAITZ: What Mr. Berg does , in r e a l i t y , he

submi t ted in Pennsylvania and then he cont inued f i l i n gemergency l e t t e r s .

THE COURT: He wouldn ' t be al lowed to do t h a t underth e ru l ing I ' v e made and he sa i d he would accep t it.

MR. ROSS: He accep ted it t h e re and then hecont inued f i l i n g emergency l e t t e r s .

THE COURT: Then he would be sa nc t i one d .Do you have anyth ing e l se to say about my proposa l

t h a t l eave of co u r t be obta ined be fore f i l i n g something?



30/44

1234

10: 19 56789

1020 1011121314

1020 1516171819

10202021222324

102025


MS. TAITZ: I 'm j u s t concerned because my - - myproblem was t h a t he - - as a mat te r o f fac t , I unders tand Iunder s tand t h a t h is a s s i s t a n t i s th e one t h a t was f i l i n gt hose emergency l e t t e r s . They were voluminous , and as Isa id - - I asked fo r it. Th e judge t h e re i n Pennsylvaniagran ted and - - as a m a t t e r o f fac t , he was not al lowed tof i l e anyth ing u n t i l th e i s su e o f j u r i s d i c t i o n i s r e so l ve d .

THE COURT: Okay. Now we ' r e g e t t i n g o f f t r a c k .I w i l l no t ye t impose t h a t or de r bu t I am going to

c ons i de r t h a t or de r based on th e f i l i n g s I g e t i n the f u t u r e .So be a l e r t to th e f a c t t h a t we may u l t i ma t e l y

impose t h a t o rd e r .We now tu rn to th e schedul ing confe rence , Counsel ,

and we do have l o t s o f o th e r fo lks ou t here and I apolog izeto you a l l t h a t t he se i n i t i a l mat te r s have t aken some t ime .

But moving along, I see both s id es agree t h a t t h i si s a j u ry trial and t hey have proposed t h a t it be t r i e d onMay 12 th , 2012, and t hey are t a l k i n g about a f i v e - t o s ix -d aytrial.

I s t h a t th e agreement of the p a r t i e s ?MS. TAITZ: No, Your Honor, because it was

agreement was reached before you dismissed t he case . Nowt h e re i s no ca s e .

Depending on what w i l l be f i l ed and what w i l l be - -THE COURT: So what do you propose fo r



31/44

1234

10:20 56789

1021 1011121314

1021 1516171819

1021 2021222324

1021 25


a t r i a l date?MS. TAITZ:THE COURT:

confe rence .

I bel ieve we need to postponeOkay. We're a t a schedul ing

My order says a t r i a l date w i l l be s e t a t th eschedul ing conference , so we w i l l s e t a t r i a l d a t e .

29

What do th e defense propose? I thought the defensewas in agreement t h a t it would be March 12th .

MR. HAGGERTY: I am in agreement with t h a t ,Your Honor.

B i l l Haggerty on b eh a l f o f the Law Off ices o f OrlyTai tz and Orly T ai t z as an i n d i v i d u a l .

However, we a re wai t ing a second amended compla in t .THE COURT: I unders t and .MR. HAGGERTY: And I d o n ' tTHE COURT: That i s o f t en th e case .MR. HAGGERTY: So I d o n ' t know. I f we' re j u s t

t a lk ing about a quantum merui t cla im it's going to be l e s sthan f i v e o r s ix days.

THE COURT: Okay.MR. HAGGERTY: I f t h e re ' s 12 o r 13 causes o f ac t ion

t h a t somehow he i s ab le to p lead , it might go to f ive ors ix days , so it i s d i f f i c u l t a t t h i s t ime to l e t Your Honorknow if I agree with t h a t .

THE COURT: Okay. I unders t and . Fa i r enough.



32/44

1234

10:21 56789

1022 1011121314

1022 1516171819

10222021222324

102225


That p a r a l l e l s what Ms. Tai tz sa i d .

2012.

Ms. Bredahl , i s March 12th a Tuesday?THE CLERK: No, it's a Monday.THE COURT: We s t a r t our t r i a l s on Tuesday.We're going to s t a r t t h i s trial on March 13th ,

30

We are going to s e t it fo r s ix days.j u ry trial.

It w i l l be a

The p r e t r i a l confe rence - - and you want to w r i t et h i s down - - w i l l t ake p lace on - -

THE CLERK: February 27th .THE COURT: - - February 27th , 2012.And the d i sc ove r y cu t o f f w i l l be - -THE CLERK: December 13 t h .THE COURT: December 13th , 2011.I f you fill in those d a tes on the f ro n t page of the

schedul ing orde r which i s av a i l ab l e here when you check in ,it w i l l produce o th e r d a t e s and it w i l l a lso produce o th e rru l e s on how to conduct the l i t i g a t i o n .

So I urge you - - in f a c t , I o rd e r you to bef ami l i a r with the da tes produced by t h a t schedul ing orde rbes ides what we've j u s t done here .

Now, I'll say to you and I'll say to everyone e l sein the cour t room here on a schedul ing confe rence , whenp a r t i e s appear fo r schedul ing conference I a lso o rd e r them to



33/44

1234

10:22 56789

1023 1011121314

1023 1516171819

10232021222324

102325


d i sc uss the r e so l u t i o n o f t h i s case when t he y l e a ve .You w i l l no t have a trial in t h i s c ou r t un le s s

you 've appeared be f o r e a t h i rd p a r t y media to r t o d i sc us ss e t t l e m e n t .

Now i s a good t ime to beg in t hos e d i s c u s s i o n s ,perhaps even to s e t t l e th e case as you l eave . So I 'm

31

or de r i ng t he p a r t i e s here to t a l k to Mr. Berg and d i sc uss t hep o s s i b i l i t i e s o f how t h i s case might be r e s o lve d and a l so tod i sc uss what t h i r d p a r t y media to r might be i nvo lved as th etrial da t e of May 13 th app roaches .

A ll r i g h t . I 'm going to t ake the - MR. BERG: Your HonorTHE COURT: Yes.MR. BERG: you sa id May 1 3 t h .THE COURT: I meant March 13 .MR. BERG: I a po log i z e .THE COURT: No, no, p l e a s e . That was a good p o i n t .Mr. Berg , I 'm go ing to t ake t he ma t t e r o f your pro

hac vice admiss ion under submiss ion and ru l e on t h a t s h o r t l y .I d id have a que s t i on . I b e l i ev e somewhere I read

t h a t Mr. Linco ln was an ex te rn to numerous f e de r a l j udge s .I s t h a t t r ue ?MR. BERG: That i s c o r r e c t .THE COURT: So he was an ex te rn to Judge Reinhard t .

Do you know when?



34/44

1234

10:23 56789

1024 1011121314

1024 1516171819

10242021222324

102425


MR. BERG: I d o n ' t have t h a t i n f ro n t o f me,Your Honor .

THE COURT: And do you know what o t h e r f e de r a ljudge he was an ex te rn to?

MR. BERG: I 'm no t sure . I can g e t t h a t to youl a t e r today .

THE COURT: T h a t ' s n o t im por t a n t .So we've argued th e admiss ion of t he pro hac v i c e ,

we've s e t our trial d a t e , and Mr. - - I'm s o r r y , was itMr. Ross?

MR. ROSS: Yes, Your Honor, me?MR. HAGGERTY: Hagger ty .THE COURT: Oh, Mr. Hagger ty , t h e re you a r e .Mr. Hagger ty , if a f t e r th e motion t o d i sm i s s , th e

case ge t s ex t remely s i m p l i f i e d and you want to move up th etrial d a t e , j u s t br ing it up as soon as we g e t a r e so l u t i o non th e mot ion to d i sm i s s .

So I 'm hear ing what y o u ' r e s a y ing .I f ind t h a t e f f i c i e n c y i s promoted by a t l e a s t

having a da te to aim a t , and in a l l f a i r n e s s it's b e s t to aima t a wor s t - c a se sc e na r i o I s h o u l d n ' t say wor s t - c a sescenar io - - th e sc e na r i o of a l a rg e compla in t .

I f you want to move up th e trial da t e a f t e r - - whenand if you succeed in nar rowing th e compla in t , I'll look a tsuch motions .



35/44

1234

10:24 56789

10111213141516171819202122232425

022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx) 33

Anything fu r t h e r from th e p a r t i e s , then?ALL RESPONSE: No, Your Honor .Thank you.THE COURT: Okay.(End o f proceed ings . )

***C er t i f i c a t e

I hereby c e r t i f y t h a t th e fo regoing i s a t rue andco r re c t t r a n s c r i p t of the s t en o g rap h i ca l l y recordedproceed ings in th e above mat t e r .

Fees charged fo r t h i s t r a n sc r i p t , l e s s any c i r c u i tfee redu c t ion and/or d ep o s i t , a re in conformance wi th theregu la t i ons of the j u d i c i a l confe ren ce of the

D i < . l l o l ~ "" r>


36/44

$$150,000 [1] -

25:12

0

022811 [1] - 2:203/22/2011 [1] -

33:14

1

1 [2] - 2:12 ,

13:12

10-1573-AG(PLAx

[3] - 1:10, 2:2 ,

1:2

10199 [2] - 1:24,

33:14

10D [2] - 1:4, 2:2

10th [1] - 2:16

12 [2] - 2:4 ,

29:21

12th [3] -

28:18 , 29:8

, 30:2

13 [2] - 29:21

, 31:15

13th [5] - 30:5

, 30:14 ,

30:15 , 31:10

, 31:14

150,000 [1] -

4:3

19444-2531 [1] - 2:5

2

2006 [1] - 12:2

2011 [4] - 1:18

, 1:1 ,

6:24 , 30:15

2012 [3] -

28:18 , 30:6

, 30:12

20th [1] -

25:10

211 [1] - 2:921st [1] - 21:4

24th [2] - 6:23

, 8:2

26302 [1] - 2:9

27th [3] - 2:12 ,

30:11 , 30:12

28 [2] - 1:18 ,

1:1

3

30 [1] - 7:18

39 [1] - 15:4

4

40 [1] - 15:4

5

555 [1] - 2:4

562-983-2500 [1] -

2:13

6

610-825-3134 [1] -

2:5

610-834-7659 [1] -

2:6

6:00 [1] - 7:15

7

7 [1] - 1:2

700 [1] - 2:16

7:00 [1] - 7:15

7:30 [9] - 7:11

, 7:13 ,

7:19 , 10:18

, 10:23 ,

11:1 , 11:6, 26:3 ,

26:20

8

818-243-5200 [1] -

2:17

818-243-5266 [1] -

2:17

9

90831-2700 [1] - 2:1391203-1202 [1] - 2:16

92691 [1] - 2:9

949-683-5411 [1] -

2:10

A

able [1] -

29:22

absolute [1] -

23:21

abusive [1] -

27:5

accept [2] -

7:3 , 27:20

accepted [1] -

27:21access [1] -

9:22

according [3]

- 5:14 , 12:18

, 21:16

accused [1] -

22:24

action [5] - 2:5

, 17:12 ,

20:6 , 27:2

, 29:21

actions [3] -

3:1 , 3:25

, 15:15additional [1]

- 12:4

additionally [1]

- 3:25

address [3] -

1:22 , 1:23

, 8:5

admission [3]

- 1:24 , 31:19

, 32:8

advantage [1]

- 24:3

advised [1] -

12:25

affidavit [4] -

11:25 , 21:18

, 22:11 ,

22:22

affidavits [2] -

21:13 , 22:22

ago [2] - 16:19

, 25:9

agree [2] -

28:16 , 29:24

agreed [1] -

27:13

agreement [5]

- 10:14 , 28:20

, 28:22 ,29:8 , 29:9

ahead [5] -

12:15 , 20:24

, 24:22 ,

25:2 , 27:15

aim [2] - 32:20

AL [1] - 1:13

al [1] - 1:4

alert [1] -

28:11

alleged [1] -

3:7

allow [2] -

6:18 , 15:18

allowed [9] -

4:12 , 4:15

, 5:9 ,5:11 , 17:2

, 21:15 ,

23:8 , 27:19

, 28:6

allowing [2] -

17:20 , 17:23

alluding [1] -

25:22

amend [1] -

2:8

amended [4] -

2:20 , 3:18

, 5:20 ,

29:13

Amendment [2]

- 9:21 ,

23:21

America [1] -

17:5

ANA [2] - 1:17 ,

1:1

analysis [2] -

4:21 , 5:18

Andorra [1] - 2:4

ANDREW [1] - 1:4

announcement [1]

- 19:1

answer[14] -

9:11 , 11:24

, 16:14 ,

16:18 , 18:1

, 18:16 ,

18:17 , 19:7

, 19:17 ,

20:19 , 20:20

, 22:16 ,

23:17

answer's [1] -

16:7

anticipate [1]

- 2:21

anticipated [1]

- 3:8apologize [5] -

1:14 , 2:15

, 6:4 ,

28:14 , 31:16

appeal [3] -

17:7 , 17:8

, 17:11

Appealing [1]

- 3:16


022811 DCCD GUILFORD 10D LINCOLN

1

appear[1] -

30:25

appearance [1]

- 17:20

appearances [1]

- 17:23

appeared [1] -

31:3application [3]

- 6:22 ,

13:9 , 24:6

applications [1]

- 24:11

applying [1] -

19:13

approaches [1]

- 31:10

approval [1] -

27:14

argued [1] -

32:8

argument [3] -8:1 , 20:16

, 22:6

arguments [1]

- 7:4

Arizona [1] -

11:8

arm [1] - 25:15

aside [1] -

11:15

aspects [1] -

13:15

assessed [1] -

25:13

assistant [2] -

23:9 , 28:3

association [1]

- 22:6

attention [1] -

6:2

Attorney [1] -

13:1

attorney [4] -

14:13 , 15:7

, 15:12 ,

18:6

attribute [1] -

23:20

available [1] -

30:17

aware [1] -

6:25

B

based [6] - 2:9

, 2:23 ,

10:9 , 20:17


37/44

, 20:20 ,

28:10

Beach [1] - 2:13

become [1] -

14:1

begin [1] -

31:5

beginning [1] - 5:16

BEHALF [2] - 2:3,

2:8

behalf[9] - 1:6

, 1:8 ,

1:12 , 13:22

, 14:15 ,

14:17 , 23:14

, 26:14 ,

29:11

Behar[1] - 2:12

behind [1] -

9:25

bench [1] -7:12

BERG [49] -

1:8 , 2:15

, 2:19 ,

5:24 , 6:3

, 7:1 , 7:9

, 7:21 ,

7:25 , 8:6

, 8:13 ,

8:17 , 9:7

, 9:10 ,

9:13 , 9:17

, 10:4 ,

10:9 , 10:13,

10:15 , 10:17

, 12:11 ,

12:16 , 13:10

, 13:20 ,

14:6 , 14:23

, 15:9 ,

15:24 , 16:3

, 16:6 ,

16:9 , 16:15

, 16:22 ,

16:24 , 17:3

, 17:11 ,

17:15 , 17:18

, 18:2 ,

25:21 , 26:1, 26:10 ,

31:12 , 31:14

, 31:16 ,

31:23 , 32:1

, 32:5

Berg [31] - 2:3, 2:4

, 1:8 , 3:6

, 5:19 ,

6:23 , 11:20

, 12:8 ,

13:1 , 13:4

, 16:2 ,

19:3 , 19:15

, 19:24 ,

20:4 , 20:5

, 21:2 ,

21:10 , 22:8, 22:10 ,

22:18 , 23:9

, 23:12 ,

24:13 , 26:9

, 27:8 ,

27:9 , 27:13

, 27:16 ,

31:7 , 31:18

berg [2] - 2:6

, 11:15

berg's [1] -

18:24

Berg's [2] -

15:14 , 15:15

best [1] -

32:20

big [1] - 5:23

Bill [1] - 29:11

[email protected] [1] -

2:14

bit [1] - 4:20

Blvd [1] - 2:16

board [12] -

11:19 , 13:4

, 13:22 ,

14:14 , 18:20

, 18:21 ,

19:2 , 19:15

, 19:25 ,

21:19 , 22:23

, 24:19

boards [1] -

23:25

bounds [1] -

8:20

boy [1] - 20:11

Bradley [1] - 2:15

Brand [1] - 2:16

brazen [1] -

15:14

Bredahl [1] -

30:2

brief[1] -25:21

bring [1] -

32:16

Brisbois [1] -

1:12

brought [2] -

2:6 , 23:5

business [1] -

4:14

C

CA [3] - 2:9, 2:13,

2:16

California [7] -

3:1 , 3:21

, 3:24 ,4:1 , 5:15

, 13:2 ,

21:17

CALIFORNIA [3] -

1:2, 1:17 , 1:1

cannot [2] -

15:18 , 19:11

careful [2] -

23:20 , 23:24

case [26] -

2:22 , 12:3

, 12:24 ,

13:2 , 14:11

, 14:25 ,

15:24 , 16:2

, 16:3 ,

19:5 , 21:10

, 21:21 ,

22:25 , 23:2

, 23:21 ,

26:18 , 28:22

, 28:23 ,

29:16 , 31:1

, 31:6 ,

31:8 , 32:15

, 32:21

cases [1] -

5:23

caused [1] -21:25

causes [1] -

29:21

CENTRAL [1] - 1:2

certificate [1] - 33:7

certify [1] - 33:8

chance [1] -

3:14

charged [1] - 33:11

charges [1] -

19:24

CHARLES [1] - 1:6

Charles [3] - 1:3

, 1:9 ,2:25

check [5] - 6:5

, 10:19 ,

13:5 , 13:21

, 30:17

CHEMICAL [1] - 1:13

Chemical [3] - 1:3

, 1:7 ,

26:15

chief[1] -

25:13

circuit [1] - 33:11

claim [6] - 2:9

, 2:13 ,

2:19 , 2:22

, 3:8 ,

29:18claiming [1] -

21:14

claims [1] -

2:7

clear[1] - 16:7

clearly [1] -

3:9

CLERK [5] -

1:2 , 1:18

, 30:3 ,

30:11 , 30:14

client [8] -

17:13 , 22:24

, 23:5 ,23:10 , 24:14

, 24:23 ,

27:4

clients [3] -

15:15 , 17:16

, 26:25

closed [1] -

9:25

CMRS [2] - 1:24,

33:14

coming [2] -

19:23 , 21:2

committed [1]

- 23:4

committing [1]

- 22:20

communication [3]

- 7:3 ,

7:8 , 8:10

complaint [16]

- 2:20 , 3:7

, 3:10 ,

3:18 , 3:22

, 5:2 , 5:5

, 5:14 ,

5:20 , 19:6

, 22:15 ,

29:13 , 32:22

, 32:24complete [1] -

24:9

completely [1]

- 24:9

conceding [2]

- 16:19 , 20:8

concern [2] -

17:19 , 26:24

concerned [1]



2

- 28:1

concurring [1]

- 22:21

conduct [3] -

15:18 , 21:24

, 30:19

conference [11]

- 2:1 ,10:8 , 12:10

, 26:17 ,

28:13 , 29:4

, 29:6 ,

30:9 , 30:24

, 30:25, 33:13

confidential [1]

- 13:25

conformance [1] -

33:12

confused [1] -

24:15

conscience [1]

- 15:18

consider[5] -

8:10 , 8:16

, 13:18 ,

14:4 , 28:10

consideration [1]

- 14:20

considered [1]

- 8:9

considering [1]

- 26:16

Constitution [1]

- 9:22

contempt [1] -

25:4

content [1] -

10:10

continue [1] -

2:4

continued [4]

- 7:22 , 21:12

, 27:17 ,

27:22

continuous [1]

- 15:14

conveyed [2] -

13:21 , 14:15

convicted [4]

- 19:9 , 21:3

, 21:12 ,21:23

convictions [1]

- 23:7

coordinator[1]

- 18:21

copies [1] -

1:19

copy [3] -

11:22 , 19:6


38/44

correct [4] -

9:13 , 22:6

, 31:23, 33:9

Counsel [4] -

7:14 , 9:4

, 9:19 ,

28:13

couple [1] -1:21

COURT [107] - 1:1,

1:25 , 1:21

, 2:17 ,

3:3 , 4:4 ,

4:8 , 4:18

, 4:24 ,

5:3 , 5:13

, 5:16 ,

5:25 , 6:5

, 7:2 ,

7:12 , 7:24

, 8:1 , 8:8

, 8:14 ,

8:25 , 9:3

, 9:9 ,

9:11 , 9:14

, 9:18 ,

10:6 , 10:12

, 10:14 ,

10:16 , 10:21

, 11:6 ,

11:10 , 11:14

, 11:21 ,

12:4 , 12:7

, 12:15 ,

13:7 , 13:12

, 14:3 ,

14:19 , 15:6, 15:12 ,

16:1 , 16:5

, 16:7 ,

16:10 , 16:16

, 16:23 ,

16:25 , 17:9

, 17:13 ,

17:16 , 17:19

, 18:3 ,

18:11 , 18:17

, 19:10 ,

19:17 , 20:7

, 20:11 ,

20:16 , 20:22, 21:5 ,

22:3 , 22:8

, 22:12 ,

22:17 , 23:3

, 23:12 ,

23:17 , 24:8

, 24:15 ,

24:21 , 24:25

, 25:5 ,

25:8 , 25:11

, 25:15 ,

25:25 , 26:2

, 26:11 ,

26:16 , 27:3

, 27:6 ,

27:9 , 27:19

, 27:23 ,

28:8 , 28:25, 29:3 ,

29:14 , 29:16

, 29:20 ,

29:25 , 30:4

, 30:12 ,

30:15 , 31:13

, 31:15 ,

31:17 , 31:24

, 32:3 ,

32:7 , 32:13

, 33:4

court [47] -

1:14 , 2:8

, 2:9 ,

2:18 , 3:20

, 5:12 ,

6:12 , 6:14

, 7:17 ,

9:25 , 11:3

, 11:10 ,

11:18 , 11:20

, 13:2 ,

14:5 , 14:6

, 14:16 ,

14:24 , 15:5

, 15:13 ,

15:15 , 15:17

, 17:14 ,

17:17 , 18:7, 18:11 ,

20:5 , 20:15

, 21:5 ,

21:25 , 22:3

, 23:20 ,

24:1 , 24:3

, 24:24 ,

25:4 , 25:16

, 25:17 ,

26:7 , 26:20

, 26:23 ,

27:1 , 27:25

, 31:2

Court[4]

- 2:4

,18:10 , 19:16

, 19:22

courtroom [2]

- 10:1 , 30:24

COURTROOM [1] -

1:4

courts [4] -

6:2 , 6:18

, 6:19 ,

9:22

CR [1] - 2:2

create [1] -

7:20

creates [1] -

7:21

CRR [2] - 1:24, 33:14

CSR [2] - 1:24, 33:14Ctr[1] - 2:12

cutoff[1] -

30:13

D

DAILY [1] - 1:17

damages [1] -

22:1

data [1] -

12:12

date [9] - 2:1

, 29:1 ,

29:5 , 29:6

, 31:10 ,

32:9 , 32:16

, 32:20 ,

32:23

DATE [1] - 33:14

dates [3] -

30:16 , 30:18

, 30:21

Daylight [3] - 1:3

, 1:7 ,

26:15

DAYLIGHT [1] - 1:13

days [4] - 6:2

, 29:19 ,29:23 , 30:7

DCCD [1] - 2:2

deal [2] - 5:6

, 24:4

deals [2] -

8:20 , 8:23

decades [1] -

16:11

December[2]

- 30:14 , 30:15

decisions [1] -

22:4

declined [2] -

24:14 , 24:18DEFENDANT [1] -

2:8

defendant [1]

- 26:12

Defendant [1]

- 26:14

Defendant(s) [1] -

1:15

defendants [1]

- 27:6

Defendants [1]

- 1:6

defense [5] -

3:3 , 3:8 ,

18:4 , 29:7

defrauded [1]

- 23:1defrauding [1]

- 22:25

DENISE [2] - 1:24,

33:14

Dentistry [1] -

3:16

deny [2] -

20:17 , 20:20

denying [1] -

23:18

department [2]

- 1:16 ,

19:20

deposit [1] - 33:12describe [1] -

9:14

despite [1] -

16:8

determination [1]

- 6:11

determinations [1]

- 2:2

determining [2]

- 13:8 ,

26:18

developed [1]

- 7:10

different [2] -

7:18 , 13:14

difficult [2] -

26:20 , 29:23

directed [1] -

12:14

directing [1] -

8:1

directly [1] -

1:15

disciplinary [22]

- 8:23 ,

9:1 , 9:5 ,

11:4 , 11:19

, 13:3 ,

13:22 , 14:14

, 15:1 ,

16:20 , 18:20

, 19:2 ,

19:15 , 19:25

, 20:6 ,

20:9 , 21:19

, 22:15 ,

22:23 , 23:13

, 23:25 ,



3

24:19

discipline [1] -

11:23

discovery [1] -

30:13

discuss [4] -

31:1 , 31:3

, 31:7 ,31:9

discussing [1]

- 13:13

discussions [1]

- 31:5

dismiss [6] -

2:6 , 2:21

, 5:22 ,

27:1 , 32:14

, 32:17

dismissed [2]

- 22:25 , 28:22

disrespect [1]

- 15:14distress [1] -

22:1

DISTRICT [3] - 1:1,

1:2, 1:25

District [2] -

16:2 , 25:14

district [2] -

6:2 , 13:2

diversity [17] -

2:24 , 3:1

, 3:4 , 3:7

, 3:8 ,

3:12 , 3:17

, 4:5 , 4:8

, 4:19 ,

4:21 , 4:22

, 5:6 ,

5:17 , 6:6

, 6:7 , 6:9

divert [1] -

15:16

docket [1] -

10:19

document [7]

- 14:11 , 19:9

, 19:11 ,

21:3 , 22:21

, 25:23 ,

26:8document's [1]

- 3:24

documents [11]

- 10:2 ,

13:23 , 13:25

, 14:4 ,

21:6 , 21:13

, 22:9 ,

23:10 , 25:24


39/44

, 26:19 ,

26:21

dollars [1] -

4:3

done [6] - 7:22

, 10:16 ,

19:8 , 22:18

, 24:1 ,30:22

doors [1] -

9:25

down [1] -

30:10

Dr[1] - 2:8

dr_taitz@yahoo.

com [1] - 2:10

during [1] -

5:15

E

e-mail [1] -

1:18

e-mailed [1] -

19:6

early [1] - 6:11

Eastern [1] -

16:2

EDWARD [1] - 1:6

Edward [1] - 1:3

efficiency [1] -

32:19

either[1] -

3:18

electronically [1]

- 1:15eligible [1] -

18:7

Email [4] - 2:6, 2:10,

2:14, 2:18

emergency [3]

- 27:18 , 27:22

, 28:4

emotional [1]

- 22:1

encourage [1]

- 26:10

End [1] - 33:5

enforce [1] -

25:16enforcement [1]

- 25:15

engage [1] -

1:25

enormous [1]

- 22:1

ET [1] - 1:13

et [1] - 1:4

evidence [4] -

3:20 , 4:25

, 19:23 ,

20:3

ex [4] - 7:3

, 7:8 ,

8:10 , 8:20

exactly [1] -

20:23excerpt [1] -

12:18

exist [1] -

25:22

existence [4] -

8:25 , 9:5

, 9:6 ,

9:12

experience [1]

- 27:7

experienced [1]

- 21:2

explanation [2]

- 20:12

,20:13

extend [1] -

25:12

extern [3] -

31:21 , 31:24

, 32:4

extremely [2] -

10:2 , 32:15

F

facing [1] -

3:12

fact [8] - 9:15, 12:21 ,

18:21 , 20:21

, 28:2 ,

28:6 , 28:11

, 30:20

facts [1] -

25:22

failure [1] -

3:11

fair[1] - 29:25

fairness [1] -

32:20

familiar[1] -

30:21Fax [2] - 2:6, 2:17

February [4] -

6:23 , 8:2

, 30:11 ,

30:12

FEBRUARY [2] -

1:18 , 1:1

federal [11] -

2:4 , 2:8 ,

2:9 , 2:14

, 5:11 ,

6:14 , 6:16

, 13:1 ,

20:15 , 31:21

, 32:3

federalist [1] -

6:17fee [1] - 33:12

fees [1] - 33:11

felony [1] -

23:7

feud [1] -

13:15

few [1] - 16:18

file [17] - 2:19

, 3:23 ,

4:12 , 4:15

, 5:11 ,

7:6 , 8:11

, 8:15 ,

12:14 , 12:16

, 19:20 ,

19:21 , 21:18

, 23:1 ,

25:8 , 26:23

, 28:7

filed [28] -

1:15 , 3:21

, 3:25 ,

6:23 , 7:6

, 7:19 ,

8:7 , 8:18

, 10:11 ,

10:23 , 12:4

, 12:23 ,

13:1 , 14:8

, 14:11 ,

21:10 , 22:8

, 22:10 ,

22:15 , 22:22

, 23:8 ,

23:10 , 25:3

, 25:7 ,

26:7 , 26:25

, 28:24

filing [14] - 4:6

, 4:13 ,

4:16 , 5:10

, 5:20 ,

7:10 , 7:13, 10:18 ,

14:17 , 21:12

, 27:17 ,

27:22 , 27:25

, 28:3

filings [4] -

21:10 , 26:3

, 27:14 ,

28:10

fill [1] - 30:16

final [1] -

17:11

financial [1] -

22:1

fine [1] - 17:16

finish [1] -

27:11firm [1] - 22:4

first [6] - 3:18

, 5:4 ,

5:21 , 12:13

, 26:22

First [2] - 9:21

, 23:21

fitting [1] - 4:9

five [3] - 28:18

, 29:19 ,

29:22

Floor[2] - 2:12, 2:16

focus [4] - 5:7

, 10:7 ,22:17

focusing [2] -

13:16 , 18:4

folks [4] -

13:14 , 23:13

, 23:25 ,

28:14

following [1] -

16:20

Ford [1] - 2:12

foregoing [1] - 33:8

forged [2] -

21:12 , 25:24

forger[5] -

19:9 , 19:11

, 21:3 ,

22:21 , 23:6

forgery [2] -

21:24 , 23:7

forging [1] -

21:6

forth [2] - 3:9

, 3:11

forward [2] -

9:16 , 19:20

forwarded [1]

- 19:21

frankly [1] -

17:19

fraudulent [1]

- 22:9

Friday [2] -

7:15 , 12:12

frivolous [1] -

4:16

front [2] -

30:16 , 32:1

full [1] - 10:10



4

future [1] -

28:10

G

gathering [1] -

24:2

Glen [1] - 2:4

Glendale [1] - 2:16

Gmelich [1] - 2:15

Google [1] -

5:25

government [1]

- 11:9

grant [5] -

14:24 , 20:5

, 20:18 ,

24:14 , 24:18

granted [8] -

2:7 , 17:21

, 24:12 ,

24:16 , 24:17

, 27:1 ,

28:6

granting [1] -

8:14

greatly [2] -

21:25

grown [1] -

15:13

guess [1] -

16:24

GUILFORD [2] - 1:4,

2:2

guilt [1] - 22:6

guilty [3] -17:5 , 17:22

, 21:6

H

hac [26] - 1:9

, 1:24 ,

6:21 , 10:7

, 12:5 ,

12:10 , 13:1

, 13:8 ,

13:16 , 14:22

, 14:25 ,

17:21 , 17:25

, 18:4 ,

19:4 , 20:5

, 20:8 ,

20:20 , 20:25

, 24:6 ,

24:11 , 24:12

, 24:16 ,

25:19 , 31:19

, 32:8


40/44

Haggerty [7] - 2:11,

2:12 , 1:11

, 29:11 ,

32:12 , 32:13

, 32:14

HAGGERTY [7]

- 1:11 ,

25:20 , 29:9, 29:15 ,

29:17 , 29:21

, 32:12

half[2] - 15:4

, 19:8

hard [1] -

10:22

head [2] - 9:2

, 9:3

hear[4] - 6:9

, 11:13 ,

20:18 , 20:22

heard [1] -

7:12

hearing [17] -

7:15 , 7:17

, 9:9 ,

11:4 , 11:19

, 12:21 ,

13:4 , 17:6

, 17:7 ,

18:22 , 19:2

, 19:17 ,

20:2 , 20:9

, 20:18 ,

24:18 , 32:18

hearings [1] -

7:18

heed [1] - 7:4

helping [1] -

4:21

hereby [1] - 33:8

Hill [1] - 2:5

hired [1] -

22:18

hires [1] -

19:11

history [1] -

21:9

hits [1] - 6:1

hold [2] -

27:10

Holsworth [1] - 16:1

home [1] -

19:12

honest [1] -

3:5

Honor[37] -

1:5 , 1:10

, 1:11 ,

2:16 , 2:21

, 2:24 ,

6:3 , 7:1 ,

7:9 , 10:4

, 10:20 ,

11:18 , 12:19

, 12:23 ,

13:6 , 13:10

, 13:23 ,14:16 , 15:4

, 15:25 ,

16:4 , 16:8

, 16:9 ,

16:10 , 18:15

, 20:10 ,

21:9 , 25:20

, 26:13 ,

26:24 , 28:21

, 29:10 ,

29:23 , 31:12

, 32:2 ,

32:11 , 33:2

honor[1] -

17:11

HONORABLE [1] -

1:4

honorable [1]

- 20:5

I

idea [3] - 21:1

, 27:3 ,

27:4

III [2] - 1:6, 1:3

important [2] -

11:11 , 32:7impose [2] -

28:9 , 28:12

imposed [1] -

15:8

impression [1]

- 9:24

INC [1] - 1:13

Inc [1] - 1:4

inclined [2] -

9:23 , 10:1

including [2] -

15:15 , 26:19

indeed [1] -

22:23individual [2]

- 19:7 , 29:12

information [6]

- 4:20 ,

11:4 , 11:19

, 12:5 ,

23:5 , 24:2

Information [2] - 1:3

, 1:7

INFORMATION [1] -

1:13

initial [1] -

28:15

innocent [2] -

17:5 , 17:22

inquiry [1] -

14:16instant [1] -

15:16

Internet [3] -

14:9 , 14:12

, 23:22

interrupt [1] -

12:8

introduce [1] -

3:14

involved [1] -

31:9

Iqbal/Twombly [1]

- 5:25

issue [9] -5:21 , 6:6

, 6:7 , 6:9

, 8:3 ,

10:24 , 16:17

, 24:5 ,

28:7

issued [5] -

15:22 , 18:8

, 18:14 ,

24:13 , 26:6

issues [2] -

3:12 , 5:4

Item [1] - 1:2

items [1] -

1:21

J

ob [2] - 4:14

, 21:7

Jonathan [3] - 2:15

, 1:6 ,

26:14

ross@bglawyers.

com [1] - 2:18

JUDGE [1] - 1:4

Judge [2] -

1:19 , 31:24udge [8] -

12:24 , 13:2

, 15:22 ,

16:11 , 19:5

, 25:14 ,

28:5 , 32:4

udges [1] -

31:21

udicial [2] -

15:17, 33:13

urisdiction [7]

- 2:14 ,

3:2 , 3:4 ,

5:21 , 6:15

, 6:16 ,

28:7

ury [2] - 28:17, 30:8

K

keep [1] -

26:20

kept [1] - 23:2

kind [1] - 3:8

kinds [1] - 2:1

knows [1] -

14:13

L

Lafayette [1] - 2:5

large [1] -

32:22

last [8] - 2:11

, 2:23 ,

3:21 , 4:20

, 6:4 ,

12:12 , 19:8

late [1] - 12:13

law [3] - 6:15

, 6:17 ,

15:3

Law [4] - 2:4, 2:8, 1:13 ,

29:11

lawsuits [5] -

4:7 , 4:12

, 4:13 ,

4:16 , 5:10

least [1] -

32:19

leave [7] - 2:8

, 17:10 ,

26:7 , 26:22

, 27:25 ,

31:1 , 31:6

leaves [1] -

9:24

leeway [2] -

4:10 , 4:18

left [2] - 6:3

, 26:19

legal [2] - 3:25

, 15:20

legitimate [1]

- 15:17

less [2] -



5

29:18, 33:11

letter[13] -

6:23 , 6:25

, 7:2 , 7:4

, 7:5 , 8:2

, 8:9 ,

8:20 , 9:15

, 10:3 ,10:10 , 10:12

, 12:19

letters [3] -

27:18 , 27:22

, 28:4

level [1] - 21:1

Lewis [1] -

1:12

Liberi [2] -

11:25 , 21:3

light [1] - 8:6

likelihood [2]

- 2:4 , 2:17

Lincoln[9]

- 1:3, 1:9 ,

2:25 , 3:20

, 4:2 ,

24:23 , 25:4

, 25:13 ,

31:21

LINCOLN [2] - 1:6,

2:2

Lisa [2] -

11:25 , 21:3

listen [1] -

20:13

listening [1] -

27:12

litigation [1] -

30:19

live [1] - 21:15

living [1] -

4:25

look [4] - 5:20

, 5:21 ,

6:7 , 32:24

lost [1] - 5:6

lot [1] - 22:1

lots [1] - 28:14

lying [1] - 23:2

M

made [5] -

3:11 , 6:19

, 7:4 ,

14:3 , 27:20

mail [1] - 1:18

mailed [1] -

19:6

main [2] - 4:6


41/44

, 4:13

major[1] -

7:10

malice [1] -

21:2

malicious [1] -

2:13

MARCE [1] -12:25

Marcee [1] -

12:25

March [6] -

20:2 , 21:4

, 29:8 ,

30:2 , 30:5

, 31:15

Mare [1] -

12:25

MARE [1] -

12:25

materials [2] -

14:7 , 14:8matter[14] -

8:6 , 8:20

, 8:21 ,

8:22 , 11:10

, 15:2 ,

15:5 , 16:20

, 18:21 ,

28:2 , 28:6

, 31:18, 33:10

matters [4] -

6:18 , 12:9

, 15:17 ,

28:15

mean [2] -

15:21 , 25:23

meant [1] -

31:15

mediator[2] -

31:3 , 31:9

meeting [1] -

11:9

member[1] -

18:6

memory [1] -

3:6

meruit [2] -

27:2 , 29:18

Mexico [1] -

21:18microphone [1]

- 11:14

might [9] - 6:9

, 7:14 ,

16:11 , 18:18

, 19:24 ,

20:19 , 29:22

, 31:8 ,

31:9

million [2] -

4:3 , 13:14

mind [1] - 6:20

misconduct [1]

- 21:21

Mission [1] - 2:9

misstatements [1]

- 24:3moment [2] -

4:11 , 8:18

moments [1] -

16:19

Monday [2] -

7:17 , 30:3

MONDAY [2] - 1:18

, 1:1

morning [8] -

1:5 , 7:11

, 7:17 ,

8:7 , 8:18

, 10:18 ,

26:4 , 26:20most [2] - 19:7

, 27:12

motion [21] -

2:6 , 2:7 ,

2:21 , 5:22

, 10:7 ,

12:5 , 12:10

, 14:22 ,

14:23 , 15:16

, 23:1 ,

25:3 , 25:5

, 25:11 ,

25:19 , 26:4

, 26:5 ,

26:25 , 27:1

, 32:14 ,

32:17

motions [1] -

32:25

move [2] -

32:15 , 32:23

moving [1] -

28:16

MR [62] - 1:5

, 1:8 ,

1:11 , 2:15

, 2:19 ,

5:24 , 6:3

, 7:1 , 7:9, 7:21 ,

7:25 , 8:6

, 8:13 ,

8:17 , 9:7

, 9:10 ,

9:13 , 9:17

, 10:4 ,

10:9 , 10:13,

10:15 , 10:17

, 12:11 ,

12:16 , 13:10

, 13:20 ,

14:6 , 14:23

, 15:9 ,

15:24 , 16:3

, 16:6 ,

16:9 , 16:15, 16:22 ,

16:24 , 17:3

, 17:11 ,

17:15 , 17:18

, 18:2 ,

25:20 , 25:21

, 26:1 ,

26:10 , 26:13

, 26:24 ,

27:4 , 27:21

, 29:9 ,

29:15 , 29:17

, 29:21 ,

31:12 , 31:14

, 31:16 ,

31:23 , 32:1

, 32:5 ,

32:11 , 32:12

MS [43] - 3:14

, 4:6 ,

4:10 , 4:22

, 5:2 , 5:8

, 5:14 ,

9:2 , 10:25

, 11:8 ,

11:12 , 11:16

, 11:22 ,

12:6 , 18:9

, 18:15 ,18:18 , 19:14

, 19:19 ,

20:10 , 20:14

, 20:19 ,

21:1 , 21:8

, 22:7 ,

22:10 , 22:14

, 22:19 ,

23:4 , 23:16

, 24:7 ,

24:12 , 24:17

, 24:23 ,

25:3 , 25:7

, 25:9 ,

25:12 , 27:7

, 27:16 ,

28:1 , 28:21

, 29:2

must [2] - 2:12

, 26:22

N

name [1] -

19:9

narrowing [1]

- 32:24

nearly [1] - 4:2need [8] - 9:3

, 11:3 ,

12:7 , 13:13

, 17:16 ,

24:25 , 26:7

, 29:2

needs [2] -

4:22 , 4:23

never[1] -

21:7

New [1] -

21:18

next [2] -

10:17 , 13:19

nice [1] -

20:11

normal [1] -

1:25

notation [1] -

19:21

nothing [3] -

2:13 , 4:24

, 20:9

notice [1] -

24:13

numerous [2]

- 3:25 , 31:21

O

oath [1] -

14:13

obtained [1] -

27:25

occasionally [1]

- 27:12

occupation [5]

- 4:6 ,

4:13 , 4:16

, 5:9 ,

5:10

office[6]

-1:20 , 3:20

, 3:23 ,

21:14 , 21:20

, 23:9

Offices [4] - 2:4, 2:8

, 1:13 ,

29:11

often [1] -

29:16

once [1] - 9:7



6

one [5] - 20:19

, 25:3 ,

26:25 , 27:1

, 28:3

ongoing [2] -

7:22 , 21:24

open [4] - 10:1

, 18:19 ,18:23 , 18:24

oppose [3] -

27:3 , 27:4

, 27:7

opposition [2]

- 20:8 , 22:4

order[18] -

3:23 , 12:11

, 15:10 ,

16:8 , 18:8

, 18:14 ,

26:6 , 26:22

, 27:10 ,

27:13 , 28:9

, 28:10 ,

28:12 , 29:5

, 30:17 ,

30:20 , 30:21

, 30:25

ordered [1] -

25:4

ordering [1] -

31:7

orders [4] -

11:17 , 15:7

, 18:5 ,

25:16

original [2] -

3:7 , 26:25

Orly [11] - 2:8, 2:8

, 1:12 ,

1:13 , 3:15

, 7:11 ,

7:22 , 8:19

, 10:19 ,

29:11 , 29:12

outside [1] -

27:1

overstated [1]

- 10:19

overstepped [2]

- 8:19 ,

12:20own [4] - 5:2

, 15:15 ,

25:16

P

PA [1] - 2:5

PADDOCK [2] - 1:24,


42/44

33:14

page [2] - 7:23

, 30:16

papers [6] -

10:21 , 13:8

, 13:17 ,

18:5 , 19:4

, 24:8paralegal [2] -

11:25 , 12:1

parallels [1] -

30:1

part [10] - 9:7

, 10:17 ,

11:24 , 12:20

, 12:21 ,

12:24 , 13:10

, 13:11 ,

14:1 , 17:19

parte [4] - 7:3

, 7:8 ,

8:10 , 8:20

particular [1] -

20:1

particularly [1]

- 23:24

parties [7] -

11:3 , 23:19

, 26:6 ,

28:20 , 30:25

, 31:7 ,

33:1

party [2] -

31:3 , 31:9

pay [1] - 7:4

paying [1] -

6:2

Paz [1] - 2:9

pending [3] -

1:

Documents

LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged