Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Lifting the gender veil on ICT statistics in AfricaAlison Gillwald & Mariama Deen-Swarray
WSIS Forum 2013: Measuring ICT and Gender
Thursday, 30 May 13
2
Outline Conceptualising gender and ICTs
MethodologyWomen and incomeWomen and educationMarital statusPay phoneMobile access and useInternet access and useComputer access and useModelling gender and ICT
Thursday, 30 May 13
RIA Household & Individual SME ICT survey‣ Lack of data - decision relevant data for
ICT policy making and regulation
‣ PARTNERSHIP ON MEASURING ICT FOR DEVELOPMENT: delivers all indicators required by the Partnership for household, individuals, and businesses
‣ COST EFFECTIVE: Using Enumerator Areas (EA) of national census sample frames and samples households, small business simultaneously minimizes costs.
‣ SCOPE :Apart from delivering ICT indicators required by international bodies the survey delivers data and analysis for several regulatory functions such as pricing regulation, number portability and universal access.
‣ LINKAGES:explains interactions between households, individuals and informal and small businesses on ICT access and usage.
3Thursday, 30 May 13
4
Methodology
Thursday, 30 May 13
RIA Household, Individual, SME survey 2013: Botswana, Cameroon, Ethiopia,Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique,Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda,South Africa,Uganda, Tanzania.
Methodology
5
• Step 2: EAs will be sampled for each stratum using probability proportional to size (PPS).
• Step 3: For each EA two listings will be compiled, one for house-holds and one for businesses. The listings serve as sample frame for the simple random sections.
• Step 4: 24 Households and 10 businesses will be sampled using simple random sample for each selected EA.
• Step 5: From all household members 15 years or older or visitor staying the night at the house one will be randomly selected based on simple random sampling.
HH SampleHH Sample
TotalHH Sample Business Sample
Total
Botswana 900 400 1,300
Cameroon 1,200 500 1,700
Ethiopia 1,600 600 2,200
Ghana 1,200 500 1,700
Kenya 1,200 500 1,700
Mozambique 1,200 500 1,700
Namibia 900 400 1,300
Nigeria 1,600 600 2,200
Rwanda 1,200 500 1,700
South Africa 1,600 600 2,200
Tanzania 1,200 500 1,700
Uganda 1,200 500 1,700
Tunisia 1,200 500 1,700
Total 15,300 6,200 21,500
Sample SizeThe desired level of accuracy for the survey was set to a confidence level of 95% and an absolute precision (relative margin of error) of 5%. The population proportion P was set conservatively to 0.5 which yields the largest sample size (Lwanga & Lemeshow, 1991). The minimum sample size was determined by the following equation (Rea & Parker, 1997):
n =Z
ap(1 − p)
Cp
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
2
=1.96 0.5(1 − 0.5)
0.05
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
2
= 384
Inserting the parameters for the survey yields the minimum sample size for simple random sampling. Due to the sampling method chosen for the survey the minimum sample size has to be multiplied by the design effect variable (Lwanga & Lemeshow, 1991). In the absence of empirical data from previous surveys that would have suggested a differed value, the default value of two was chosen for the design effect (UNSD, 2005). This yields then a minimum sample size of 768 per country for households and individuals. The actual sample size for countries is slightly larger than the minimum requirement to compensate for clustering effects and have a wide enough spread of EAs through out a country. For the businesses a design effect of 1 is assumed leading to a minimum sample of 384 businesses for each country.
Survey Characteris-tics
Household & Indi-viduals
Businesses
Target PopulationAll households
Individuals 15 years or older.
all businesses
Domains 1 = national level1 = national levelTabulation groups Urban, Rural NationalOversampling Urban 60% Rural 40%Urban 60% Rural 40%Clustering Enumerator Areas (EA) national Census Enumerator Areas (EA) national Census None Response Random substitutionRandom substitutionSample Frame Census sample from from NSOCensus sample from from NSOConfidence Level 95% 95%Design Factor 2 1Absolute precision 5% 5%Population Proportion 0.5, for maximum sample size0.5, for maximum sample sizeMinimum Sample Size 768 384
WeightingFour weights will be constructed, for households, individuals, small businesses and public institutions. The weights are based on the inverse selection probabilities1 and gross up the data to national level when applied.
Household weight: HHw = DW1
PHH *PEA
Individual weight: INDw = DW1
PHH *PEA *PI
Business Weight: Busw = DW 1PBus *PEAI
Household Selection Probability: PHHw =n
HHEA
EA Selection Probability: PEAw = mHHEA
HHSTRATA
RESEARCH ICT AFRICA
2 2011 Brief Survey Methodology
1 See UNSD (2005) page 119 for a detailed discussion on sampling weights.
Thursday, 30 May 13
Fixed, mobile, PC, Internet penetration, TV, radioSA Census and RIA survey 2011
6
Table : Summary of ICT Access in South Africa from Census 2012 and Research ICT Africa Household & Individual User Survey 2012
Table : Summary of ICT Access in South Africa from Census 2012 and Research ICT Africa Household & Individual User Survey 2012
Table : Summary of ICT Access in South Africa from Census 2012 and Research ICT Africa Household & Individual User Survey 2012
Table : Summary of ICT Access in South Africa from Census 2012 and Research ICT Africa Household & Individual User Survey 2012
Table : Summary of ICT Access in South Africa from Census 2012 and Research ICT Africa Household & Individual User Survey 2012
Census DataCensus Data RIA Survey DataRIA Survey Data
2006 2011 2007 2011
Households with Fixed Line
18.5% 14.5% 18.2% 18.0%
Households with Computer
15.6% 21.4% 14.8% 24.5%
Household with Radio 76.5% 67.5% 77.7% 62.3%
Households with Television
65.5% 74.5% 71.1% 78.2%
Households with Internet 35.2% table : Summary of ICT Access in South Africa from Census 2012 and Research ICT Africa Household & Individual User Survey 2012
19.7% (Household)33.7% (Individual)
Cellphone Ownership 72.7% 88.9% 62.1% 84.2%
Thursday, 30 May 13
7
GENDER
Exclusion
Inclusion
Country Dummy
Ethnicity/culture
Marital status
Income
Age
Education
Pay phones
Fixed phones
Mobile phones
Internet
AccessOwnership
UseAffordability/ Skills
ImpactHuman, economic and
social development
GENDER ANALYSIS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Conceptual framework
Thursday, 30 May 13
8
Analysis & Findings
Thursday, 30 May 13
Income
9
Table 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individualsTable 1 – General sample statistics of randomly selected individuals
Country
% females
Average individual income US $Average individual income US $Average individual income US $
Average income US$ pppAverage income US$ pppAverage income US$ ppp Average
age
% with a bank account% with a bank account% with a bank account
Country
% females
Average individual income US $Average individual income US $Average individual income US $
Average income US$ pppAverage income US$ pppAverage income US$ ppp Average
ageAll Male Female
Country
% females
All Male Female All Male Female
Average age
All Male Female
Botswana 59.1% 270 340 222 460 579 378 34 48.4 52.4 45.6
Cameroon 51.9% 72 94 52 145 189 104 33 10.9 10.8 10.9
Ethiopia 44.8% 27 39 12 69 101 30 34 3.7 4.3 3.0
Ghana 55.1% 87 117 63 183 244 134 34 29.4 35.5 24.5
Kenya 61.9% 85 119 64 154 214 116 28 44.5 57.6 36.4
Namibia 56.8% 194 279 130 270 387 181 40 56.3 51.1 60.3
Nigeria 46.9% 102 151 47 171 252 78 34 30.5 39.8 20.0
Rwanda 49.9% 28 36 21 57 72 42 30 16.3 17.4 15.2
South Africa
54.2% 402 617 221 595 914 328 36 58.9 62.7 55.7
Tanzania 54.4% 35 45 26 89 115 68 34 6.2 7.4 5.1
Uganda 44.0% 52 59 42 126 144 102 31 15.2 18.7 10.7
Thursday, 30 May 13
Income and Access to Bank Accounts
10
South Africa
Botswana
Namibia
Nigeria
Ghana
Kenya
Cameroon
Uganda
Tanzania
Ethiopia
Rwanda 42
30
68
102
104
116
134
78
181
378
328
72
101
115
144
189
214
244
252
387
579
914
Average Monthly Individual Income US$ PPP
Male Female
South Africa
Namibia
Botswana
Kenya
Nigeria
Ghana
Rwanda
Uganda
Cameroon
Tanzania
Ethiopia 3
5.1
10.9
10.7
15.2
24.5
20
36.4
45.6
60.3
55.7
4.3
7.4
10.8
18.7
17.4
35.5
39.8
57.6
52.4
51.1
62.7
3.7
6.2
10.9
15.2
16.3
29.4
30.5
44.5
48.4
56.3
58.9
share of individuals with Bank Accounts
All Male Female
Thursday, 30 May 13
Main Activity Engaged in...
More men than women who are students across all countries and likewise for those who are employed.
More men than women reported to be self-employed across all countries except in Ghana and Kenya
More women are among the unemployed in 9 of the 11 countries.
There is a comparatively large number of women who are housewives or involved in unpaid house work.
In general women are less involved than their male counterparts in income generating activities
11Thursday, 30 May 13
Education
12
Table 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statisticsTable 2 – Gender disaggregated educational statistics
Highest Education: TertiaryHighest Education: TertiaryHighest Education: Tertiary Highest Education: SecondaryHighest Education: SecondaryHighest Education: Secondary Highest Education: PrimaryHighest Education: PrimaryHighest Education: Primary
All Male Female All Male Female All Male Female
Botswana20.5% 21.9% 19.4% 53.9% 53.9% 54.0% 18.7% 19.3% 18.2%
Cameroon 7.4% 8.6% 6.2% 22.8% 19.2% 26.2% 30.6% 30.7% 30.6%
Ethiopia 2.1% 2.4% 1.8% 1.8% 1.3% 2.4% 13.1% 16.4% 8.9%
Ghana 10.5% 15.8% 6.2% 36.6% 38.9% 34.8% 27.3% 25.3% 28.9%
Kenya 26.2% 32.7% 22.3% 41.4% 41.1% 41.7% 27.4% 22.8% 30.2%
Namibia 7.1% 8.4% 6.1% 27.8% 24.3% 30.4% 45.2% 42.4% 47.4%
Nigeria 14.8% 19.5% 9.6% 37.8% 40.3% 34.9% 18.7% 18.1% 19.3%
Rwanda 1.2% 1.7% 0.7% 15.3% 16.8% 13.7% 58.4% 59.4% 57.4%
South Africa 13.3% 18.0% 9.1% 65.3% 65.8% 64.8% 17.0% 13.2% 20.2%
Tanzania 1.4% 1.5% 1.2% 11.1% 14.9% 7.8% 72.0% 73.3% 70.9%
Uganda 9.1% 11.2% 6.3% 29.9% 33.3% 25.6% 44.2% 44.6% 43.7%
Thursday, 30 May 13
Gender disaggregated Educational Statistics
13
Kenya
Botswana
Nigeria
South Africa
Ghana
Uganda
Cameroon
Namibia
Ethiopia
Tanzania
Rwanda 0.7
1.2
1.8
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.2
9.1
9.6
19.4
22.3
1.7
1.5
2.4
8.4
8.6
11.2
15.8
18
19.5
21.9
32.7
1.2
1.4
2.1
7.1
7.4
9.1
10.5
13.3
14.8
20.5
26.2
share of individuals who have attained tertiary education
All Male Female
South AfricaBotswana
KenyaNigeriaGhana
UgandaNamibia
CameroonRwanda
TanzaniaEthiopia 2.4
7.8
13.7
26.2
30.4
25.6
34.8
34.9
41.7
54
64.8
1.3
14.9
16.8
19.2
24.3
33.3
38.9
40.3
41.1
53.9
65.8
1.8
11.1
15.3
22.8
27.8
29.9
36.6
37.8
41.4
53.9
65.3
share of individuals who have secondary schooling as highest level of education
All Male Female
TanzaniaRwandaNamibiaUganda
CameroonKenyaGhana
BotswanaNigeria
South AfricaEthiopia 8.9
20.219.318.2
28.930.2
30.643.747.4
57.470.9
16.413.218.119.3
25.322.8
30.744.642.4
59.473.3
13.117
18.718.727.327.430.6
44.245.2
58.472
share of individuals with primary schooling as highest level of education
All Male Female
Thursday, 30 May 13
Mobile Phone Adoption
14
There has been an increase in mobile adoption from 2007/08 to 2011/12. Adoption in Ghana remained almost fixed.
Adoption is much higher among women in Botswana, Namibia and Cameroon (2011/12)
26.4%&
56.2%&
56.0%&
83.8%&
26.2%&
41.7%&
11.8%&
27.6%&
24.8%&
60.8%&
61.2%&
33.1%&
44.2%&
76.5%&
53.3%&
55.2%&
56.4%&
86.3%&
59.7%&
76.1%&
12.2%&
34.5%&
46.9%&
67.9%&
17.6%&
30.9%&
7.5%&
21.2%&
10.4%&
57.2%&
58.2%&
39.4%&
44.9%&
54.9%&
45.4%&
57.0%&
64.9%&
82.4%&
58.9%&
82.7%&
19%&
47%&
50%&
74%&
21%&
36%&
10%&
24%&
3%&
18%&
59%&
60%&
36%&
45%&
66%&
49%&
56%&
61%&
84%&
59%&
80%&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
2007/2008&
2011/2012&
Ugand a&
Kenya&Tanzan
ia&
Rwand
a&Ethiop
ia&
Ghana&Ca
mer
oon&
Nigeria&Nam
ibi
a&South&
Africa&Bo
tsw
ana&
share&of&individuals&that&own&a&mobile&phone...(16+&for&2007/2008)&Male& Female& NaQonal&
Thursday, 30 May 13
15
Table 3: Monthly Expenditure on Mobile PhoneTable 3: Monthly Expenditure on Mobile PhoneTable 3: Monthly Expenditure on Mobile PhoneTable 3: Monthly Expenditure on Mobile PhoneTable 3: Monthly Expenditure on Mobile PhoneTable 3: Monthly Expenditure on Mobile PhoneTable 3: Monthly Expenditure on Mobile Phone
Monthly average mobile expenditure in US$ PPPMonthly average mobile expenditure in US$ PPPMonthly average mobile expenditure in US$ PPP Monthly average mobile expenditure in US$Monthly average mobile expenditure in US$Monthly average mobile expenditure in US$
All Male Female All Male Female
Botswana 28.58 34.65 24.91 16.83 20.40 14.67
Cameroon 20.69 23.01 18.57 10.38 11.54 9.31
Ethiopia 6.77 6.67 7.08 2.71 2.67 2.84
Ghana 20.29 21.64 19.10 9.81 10.47 9.24
Kenya 17.49 18.82 16.48 9.66 10.40 9.11
Namibia 20.91 26.07 17.08 15.07 18.79 12.31
Nigeria 20.15 23.78 14.43 12.37 14.59 8.86
Rwanda 8.27 7.79 8.89 4.08 3.84 4.38
South Africa 28.63 37.75 20.60 19.34 25.50 13.92
Tanzania 22.51 22.05 23.02 8.76 8.59 8.96
Uganda 13.08 13.95 11.27 5.40 5.76 4.65
Thursday, 30 May 13
Average Monthly Expenditure on Mobile Phone Use
16
South Africa
Botswana
Namibia
Nigeria
Cameroon
Tanzania
Ghana
Kenya
Uganda
Rwanda
Ethiopia 7.08
8.89
11.27
16.48
19.10
23.02
18.57
14.43
17.08
24.91
20.60
6.67
7.79
13.95
18.82
21.64
22.05
23.01
23.78
26.07
34.65
37.75
Monthly Expenditure on Mobile Phone in US$ PPP
Male Female
Thursday, 30 May 13
17
Table 4: Mobile phone use and access across 11 African countriesTable 4: Mobile phone use and access across 11 African countriesTable 4: Mobile phone use and access across 11 African countriesTable 4: Mobile phone use and access across 11 African countriesTable 4: Mobile phone use and access across 11 African countries
Mobile Phone (Multiple Responses)Mobile Phone (Multiple Responses)Mobile Phone (Multiple Responses)
All Male Female
Main reasons for using the mobile
phone
missed call/please call me 83.8% 85.7% 86.5%
Main reasons for using the mobile
phone
sending/receiving text 83.2% 85.2% 88.2%
Main reasons for using the mobile
phone
playing games 48.0% 46.3% 42.7%Main reasons for using the mobile
phonesending/receiving money 18.8% 27.5% 34.9%
Main reasons for using the mobile
phonebrowsing the internet 17.2% 21.5% 16.0%
Main reasons for using the mobile
phone
downloading applications 15.1% 18.2% 12.9%
Main reasons for using the mobile
phone
reading/writing emails 13.6% 16.1% 11.7%
Why individuals do not have a mobile phone
cannot afford it 80.9% 81.3% 83.7%
Why individuals do not have a mobile phone
no electricity at home to charge 56.7% 57.7% 55.8%
Why individuals do not have a mobile phone
phone got stolen 19.5% 21.4% 18.8%Why individuals do not have a mobile phone no coverage where I live 18.6% 19.9% 16.4%
Why individuals do not have a mobile phone
don’t have anyone to call 19.1% 19.1% 19.3%
Why individuals do not have a mobile phone
phone is broken 7.4% 7.5% 8.0%
Thursday, 30 May 13
Mobile phone use and access across 11 African countries
18
missed call/please call me
sending/receiving text
playing games
sending/receiving money
browsing the internet
downloading applications
reading/writing emails 11.7
12.9
16
34.9
42.7
88.2
86.5
16.1
18.2
21.5
27.5
46.3
85.2
85.7
13.6
15.1
17.2
18.8
48.0
83.2
83.8
main reasons why individuals use mobile phones
All Male Female
cannot afford it
no electricity at home to charge
phone got stolen
no coverage where I live
don’t have anyone to call
phone is broken 8
19.3
16.4
18.8
55.8
83.7
7.5
19.1
19.9
21.4
57.7
81.3
7.4
19.1
18.6
19.5
56.7
80.9
reasons why individuals do not have a phone...
All Male Female
Thursday, 30 May 13
Internet Use
The emergence of mobile internet and the wider adoption of mobile phones has contributed positively to internet use.
8.5% of those using the internet did so first on their computer whilst 7% used it first on their mobile phones.
Internet use in the countries surveyed increased to 15.5% in 2011/12 from less than 10% in 2007/8.
Internet use in all countries in general and by gender increased between 2007/8 and 2011/12;
There are more men using the internet than women in all countries, except in Cameroon and Tanzania but with very little difference.
19Thursday, 30 May 13
20
3.7%%11.8%%
21.1%%35.8%%
3.4%%
6.9%%
3.9%%8.1%%
17.8%%13.1%%13.4%%16.4%%
22.8%%11.2%%
18.7%%20.4%%
40.6%%10.1%%
32.6%%
1.1%%3.1%%
11.5%%20.5%%
3.5%%
5.2%%
1.1%%3.2%%
8.5%%12.8%%14.7%%7.6%%
13.4%%7.2%%
14.2%%11.3%%
28.6%%4.0%%
26.5%%
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
2007/2008
2011/2012
Uga
nda
Keny
a Ta
nzan
ia R
wan
da E
thio
pia
Gha
na
Cam
eroo
n N
iger
ia
Nam
ibia
Sout
h Af
rica
Bots
wan
a
share&of&individuals&that&use&the&Internet...&Male% Female%
Thursday, 30 May 13
21
Table 5: Internet use and access across 11 African countriesTable 5: Internet use and access across 11 African countriesTable 5: Internet use and access across 11 African countriesTable 5: Internet use and access across 11 African countriesTable 5: Internet use and access across 11 African countries
Internet Use Internet Use Internet Use
All Male Female
Whether using the internet increases an individuals
contact with people who...
share same hobbies/recreational activities 59.6% 59.1% 60.4%
Whether using the internet increases an individuals
contact with people who...
share same political views 30.8% 37.7% 20.1%Whether using
the internet increases an individuals
contact with people who...
share religious beliefs 47.1% 46.5% 47.9%
Whether using the internet increases an individuals
contact with people who... are family and friends 69.9% 71.6% 67.4%
Whether using the internet increases an individuals
contact with people who...
are colleagues 58.1% 58.3% 57.9%
Why individuals do not use the
Internet (multiple responses)
don’t know how to use it 68.7% 66.8% 70.5%
Why individuals do not use the
Internet (multiple responses)
no computer/internet connection 65.2% 65.4% 65.1%Why individuals do not use the
Internet (multiple responses)
don’t know what the Internet is 64.6% 60.7% 68.5%Why individuals do not use the
Internet (multiple responses) too expensive 54.6% 53.0% 56.0%
Why individuals do not use the
Internet (multiple responses)
no interest/not useful 38.5% 38.3% 38.8%
Why individuals do not use the
Internet (multiple responses)
too slow, limited bandwidth 13.4% 15.8% 11.2%
Thursday, 30 May 13
Internet use and access across 11 African Countries
22
share same hobbies/recreational activities
share same political views
share religious beliefs
are family and friends
are colleagues 57.9
67.4
47.9
20.1
60.4
58.3
71.6
46.5
37.7
59.1
58.1
69.9
47.1
30.8
59.6
share of individuals who reported that using the internet increase contact with people who....
All Male Female
don’t know how to use it
no computer/internet connection
don’t know what the Internet is
too expensive
no interest/not useful
too slow, limited bandwidth 11.2
38.8
56
68.5
65.1
70.5
15.8
38.3
53
60.7
65.4
66.8
13.4
38.5
54.6
64.6
65.2
68.7
why individuals do not use the internet (multiple responses)
All Male Female
Thursday, 30 May 13
Computer Use
23
Table 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownershipTable 6 Computer use and ownership
Country
Share of individuals (15 or older) that use a ComputerShare of individuals (15 or older) that use a ComputerShare of individuals (15 or older) that use a Computer
Share of computer users (15+) that own a personal desktop
Share of computer users (15+) that own a personal desktop
Share of computer users (15+) that own a personal desktop
Share of computer users (15+) that own a personal laptop
Share of computer users (15+) that own a personal laptop
Share of computer users (15+) that own a personal laptop
Country All Male Female All Male Female All Male Female
Cameroon 15.1% 15.6% 14.6% 30.2% 35.2% 25.3% 13.2% 21.2% 5.2%
Ethiopia 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 12.1% 10.7% 13.8% 15.7% 18.7% 11.8%
Ghana 10.0% 14.2% 6.6% 48.0% 39.8% 62.5% 41.1% 55.1% 16.3%
Kenya 21.2% 29.3% 16.2% 35.7% 34.4% 37.1% 23.8% 25.7% 21.7%
Namibia 13.0% 15.9% 10.8% 30.8% 39.8% 22.7% 57.6% 58.5% 56.6%
Nigeria 7.5% 11.2% 3.3% 12.2% 12.4% 11.7% 58.6% 65.1% 33.9%
Rwanda 3.5% 2.5% 4.5% 45.3% 14.6% 62.4% 7.8% 16.5% 3.0%
South Africa 29.1% 36.2% 23.1% 44.4% 42.8% 46.4% 34.6% 39.4% 28.8%
Tanzania 1.9% 1.7% 2.0% 18.6% 24.2% 14.8% 43.2% 77.1% 20.1%
Uganda 4.8% 5.6% 3.7% 33.8% 31.7% 37.7% 19.0% 19.3% 18.5%
Computer use is still relatively low across African countries. The RIA 2011/12 results show that computer use among individuals is above 10% in only 4 of the countries surveyed.
Only in South Africa is computer use close to 30% and in Kenya it is slightly above 20%.
There are more men than women making use of computers in all countries with the exception of Ethiopia (at par), Tanzania and Rwanda (slightly more women); the gender gap much wider in Kenya and South Africa.
Thursday, 30 May 13
Computer use and ownership
24
South Africa
Kenya
Cameroon
Namibia
Nigeria
Ghana
Uganda
Rwanda
Ethiopia
Tanzania 2
2
4.5
3.7
6.6
3.3
10.8
14.6
16.2
23.1
1.7
2
2.5
5.6
14.2
11.2
15.9
15.6
29.3
36.2
1.9
2
3.5
4.8
10
7.5
13
15.1
21.2
29.1
share of individuals (15+) that use a computer
All Male Female
Ghana
Rwanda
South Africa
Kenya
Uganda
Namibia
Cameroon
Tanzania
Nigeria
Ethiopia 13.8
11.7
14.8
25.3
22.7
37.7
37.1
46.4
62.4
62.5
10.7
12.4
24.2
35.2
39.8
31.7
34.4
42.8
14.6
39.8
12.1
12.2
18.6
30.2
30.8
33.8
35.7
44.4
45.3
48
share of computer users that own a personal desktop
All Male Female
NigeriaNamibia
TanzaniaGhana
South AfricaKenya
UgandaEthiopia
CameroonRwanda 3
5.2
11.8
18.5
21.7
28.8
16.3
20.1
56.6
33.9
16.5
21.2
18.7
19.3
25.7
39.4
55.1
77.1
58.5
65.1
7.8
13.2
15.7
19
23.8
34.6
41.1
43.2
57.6
58.6
share of computer users that own a personal laptop
All Male Female
Computer use is still relatively low across African countries. The RIA 2011/12 results show that computer use among individuals is above 10% in only 4 of the countries surveyed.
Only in South Africa is computer use close to 30% and in Kenya it is slightly above 20%.
There are more men than women making use of computers in all countries with the exception of Ethiopia (at par), Tanzania and Rwanda (slightly more women); the gender gap much wider in Kenya and South Africa.
Thursday, 30 May 13
25
Table 7: Location and main use of computers across 10 African countriesTable 7: Location and main use of computers across 10 African countriesTable 7: Location and main use of computers across 10 African countriesTable 7: Location and main use of computers across 10 African countriesTable 7: Location and main use of computers across 10 African countries
Computer (Multiple responses)Computer (Multiple responses)Computer (Multiple responses)
All Male Female
Where do you use a computer...
work 40.1% 44.4% 33.2%
Where do you use a computer...
school/university 33.0% 33.9% 31.6%
Where do you use a computer...
library 8.7% 8.2% 9.6%Where do you use a computer... at home 60.1% 61.6% 57.7%
Where do you use a computer...
internet cafe 49.3% 52.1% 44.9%
Where do you use a computer...
at a friends place 36.6% 41.5% 28.9%
What do you use your computer
for...
writing letters, editing documents 75.3% 78.1% 70.7%
What do you use your computer
for...
calculations using spreadsheets 53.4% 55.1% 50.8%
What do you use your computer
for...
browsing the internet 72.9% 72.9% 72.9%What do you use
your computer for... programming 40.9% 45.2% 34.2%
What do you use your computer
for...
remixing content found online 37.7% 41.2% 32.1%
What do you use your computer
for...
playing games 63.5% 64.4% 62.0%
Thursday, 30 May 13
Location and main use of computers (multiple responses)
26
at home
internet cafe
work
at a friend’s place
school/university
library 9.6
31.6
28.9
33.2
44.9
57.7
8.2
33.9
41.5
44.4
52.1
61.6
8.7
33
36.6
40.1
49.3
60.1
where individuals make use of computers...
All Male Female
writing letters, editing documents
browsing the internet
playing games
calculations using spreadsheets
programming
remixing content found online 32.1
34.2
50.8
62
72.9
70.7
41.2
45.2
55.1
64.4
72.9
78.1
37.7
40.9
53.4
63.5
72.9
75.3
what individuals use their computers for.....
All Male Female
Thursday, 30 May 13
Public Pay Phones
Some individuals still make use of public pay phones. The results do not show a significant difference in the use of public phones by gender.
The telephone kiosk or umbrella operator appear to have replaced the use of the formal telephone booths. The results show that slightly more women are using the telephone kiosk/umbrella operators to make calls.
The issue of affordability is shown as the main reason why public pay phones/community phones are still being used. More women than men claim that they use public pay phones because it is cheaper.
27Thursday, 30 May 13
28
Table 8: Use of Pay PhonesTable 8: Use of Pay PhonesTable 8: Use of Pay PhonesTable 8: Use of Pay Phones
Public Pay PhonesPublic Pay Phones
Male Female
Use of a pay phone in the last 3 monthUse of a pay phone in the last 3 month 18.8% 18.6%
How often do you use a public phone
More than once a day 6.8% 8.0%
How often do you use a public phone
Everyday or almost everyday 13.1% 13.3%How often do you use a
public phone At least once a week 41.6% 40.8%How often do you use a
public phone
At least once a month 24.7% 26.9%
How often do you use a public phone
Less thank once a month 13.8% 11.0%
Type of public phone use most
Telephone booth (fixed line operator) 16.7% 15.6%Type of public phone use
most Telephone kiosk, umbrella operator 82.0% 83.9%
Main reasons for using a public pay phone
Main reasons for using a public pay phone
do not have a fixed line phone at home 8.4% 8.8%
Main reasons for using a public pay phone
do not have a mobile phone 23.0% 22.0%Main reasons for using a
public pay phone use it because it is cheaper 45.7% 49.1%Main reasons for using a
public pay phone
easier than having to recharge airtime mobile 13.4% 13.9%
Main reasons for using a public pay phone
difficulties charging the battery of mobile 6.9% 3.9%
What makes you use a particular community/public
pay phone
Price of calls 55.9% 58.9%
What makes you use a particular community/public
pay phone
Convenience (e.g. close to my house) 36.4% 34.7%What makes you use a particular community/public
pay phone Security 3.7% 3.0%
Thursday, 30 May 13
Access to and use of Public Pay Phones
29
At least once a week
At least once a month
Less than once a month
Everyday or almost everyday
More than once a day 8
13.3
11
26.9
40.8
6.8
13.1
13.8
24.7
41.6
frequency with which individuals use a public phone...
Male Female
Telephone booth (fixed line operator) Telephone kiosk, umbrella operator
83.9
15.6
82.0
16.7
type of public phone mostly used...
Male Female
it is cheaper
no mobile phone
easier than to recharge airtime on mobile
no fixed line phone at home
difficulting charge mobile phone battery 3.9
8.8
13.9
22.0
49.1
6.9
8.4
13.4
23.0
45.7
main reasons why individuals use public pay phones...
Male Female
price of calls
convenience (proximity)
security 3.0
34.7
58.9
3.7
36.4
55.9
reasons for using a particular community/public pay phone...
Male Female
Thursday, 30 May 13
Income & EducationEmpirical Findings
Being female, location and being single have a negative impact on income in most countries.
The age variable, the number of years of formal education, the years of work experience, mobile ownership and using the internet are positively related to income.
Country analysis - the gender variable has a negative correlation to income in South Africa but not highly significant relationship.
The urban-rural divide in income is not significant in Cameroon and South Africa.
Being a woman has a negative causal relationship to education.
In Namibia, South Africa and Botswana being a woman shows a positive correlation to income.
Household income, having a mobile phone and using the internet are positive determinants of level of education.
The findings show that an individual who is single has a better chance of gaining higher education in comparison to one who is married in Uganda and Cameroon;
30Thursday, 30 May 13
Mobile AdoptionEmpirical Findings
Being a woman is negatively correlated to mobile phone ownership but shows no causal relationship.
There is only a significant relationship in Ethiopia and Rwanda.
In South Africa and Botswana, being a woman has a positive and significant relationship to mobile adoption.
Income and education variables are found to have a positive and significant relationship to mobile adoption across all countries.
Being female and married shows a negative causal relationship in comparison to being male and married only in Ethiopia and Ghana.
31Thursday, 30 May 13
Internet & Computer UseBeing a woman had a negative effect on Internet use. In Ethiopia, Ghana and Nigeria this indicated a causal relationship (high significant).
Income and education show a positive causal effect on internet use. These variables have the same impact across all countries, though income shows no causal effect on internet use in Ghana and Ethiopia.
Ghana is considered to have one of the stronger economies in Africa, and one of the most dynamic mobile markets and yet it lags behind South Africa, Botswana, Kenya, Nigeria, Namibia and Cameroon in terms of internet use.
Being a student increases the probability of using the internet.
In Namibia, being female and married show a positive causal relationship to internet use.
Being a woman, location and age had a negative causal effect on computer use. This is the case in South Africa, Nigeria and Kenya.
Income, years of formal education, being a student, being employed and being female and married showed a positive causal effect on the use of computers.
32Thursday, 30 May 13
ConclusionThis sex-disaggregated overview indicates that women and men are not equally able to access and use ICTs. Women generally have less access to ICTs and use them sub-optimally and this increases as the technologies and services become more sophisticated and expensive.The study confirms in the adoption models that education and income have a positive impact on ownership and use of ICTs. The gender disparities found in income and education, indicate they are key contributors if inclusion is to be achieved. The positive and causal relationship between education and income further points to the importance and need for ensuring equity in education. Income was not a significant factor of internet adoption and use in Ghana and Ethiopia.Internet access seems to be wide spread in learning institutions, but women have less access to higher education where Internet provisioning is more available..Women use public phones mainly because of affordability issues. The points of policy intervention therefore need to focus on far more fundamental intergenerational issues of education and income equity than localised ICT aggregated access points.
33Thursday, 30 May 13
34
This research is made possible with the support of the IDRC
Thursday, 30 May 13