Upload
t-v-gubanova
View
220
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1624
ISSN 0036-0236, Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2007, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1624–1628. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2007.Original Russian Text © T.V. Gubanova, I K. Garkushin, 2007, published in Zhurnal Neorganicheskoi Khimii, 2007, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1726–1730.
TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS
Differential thermal analysis (DTA) was used tostudy the title five-component system. A Pt–Pt/10Rhthermocouple served as the temperature gage. A KSP-4automated potentiometer was used as a recorder.Freshly calcined
Al
2
O
3
served as a reference. The cool-ing rate was 15 K/min. The temperature range of thestudy was
300–900°ë
. All compositions wereexpressed in molar percent; temperature, in degreescentigrade. The sample size was 0.2 g.
The starting chemicals (high purity grade
Li
2
SO
4
,chemically pure grade LiCl, analytical grade LiF, andpure grade
Li
2
MoO
4
) were calcined or fused (LiCl).Lithium metavanadate was synthesized by the proce-dure described in [1]. Reagent purity was monitoredusing X-ray powder diffraction (DRON-3,
Cu
K
α
radia-tion,
Ni
β
-filter).
The specific enthalpy of melting of the eutecticcomposition was determined by quantitative DTA. ADTA setup with thermocouples attached to the bottomof crucibles was used. Three cooling and three heatingcurves were recorded for the eutectic composition anda reference (
K
2
Cr
2
O
7
, polymorphic transition at
397°ë(125.2
±
7)
kJ/kg). DTA peak areas were determined inaccordance with the recommendations of the Interna-tional Confederation for Thermal Analysis and Calo-rimetry [2]. The specific enthalpy of melting was calcu-lated from [3]
(1)
Here,
∆
t
H
ref
is the specific enthalpy of phase transitionin the reference, with the transition temperature close tothat in the test composition, kJ/kg;
S
E
and
S
ref
are theDTA peak areas due to eutectic melting and the phasetransition in the reference, respectively; and
T
E
,
and
T
ref
are the melting temperature of the eutectic compositionand the phase-transition temperature in the reference,
∆mHE ∆tHref
SE
Sref--------
TE
T ref--------= , kJ/kg.
respectively, K. The final value of the enthalpy wasfound as the average of three measurements.
EXPERIMENTAL
Experimental design in the
LiF–LiCl–LiVO
3
–Li
2
SO
4
–Li
2
MO
4
system was carried out according to theprojective thermogravimetry rules [4]. Phase-transitionparameters for the individual compounds were takenfrom [5]. All two-, three-, and four-component systemsthat are subsystems of the LiF–LiCl–
LiVO
3
–Li
2
SO
4
–Li
2
MoO
4
system were studied in [1, 6–19]. In this study,we refined some parameters, namely, the melting tem-peratures and compositions of alloys at invariant pointsin the two- and three-component systems (table). Dataon the subsystems are displayed on the phase diagramof the five-component system.
For the experimental study of the five-componentsystem, we chose the 3D polythermal section
Ä
BCD
:
Ä
, [70.0% LiCl + 30.0% LiF];
B
, [70.0% LiCl + 30.0%Li
2
SO
4
];
C
, [70.0% LiCl + 30.0% Li
2
MoO
4
];
D
, [70.0%LiCl + 30.0% LiVO
3
] (Figs. 2, 3). Section
ABCD
ispositioned in the lithium chloride crystallization vol-ume, where the components have higher melt solubili-ties.
Proceeding from the positions of the projections ofthe invariant points in three- and four-component sys-tems in the region of the
ABCD
3D section, we chose2D polythermal section
abc
:
a,
[70.0% LiCl + 18.0%Li
2
SO
4
+ 12.0% LiF];
b
, [70.0% LiCl + 18.0% Li
2
SO
4
+12.0% Li
2
MoO
4
];
c
, [70.0% LiCl + 18.0% Li
2
SO
4
+12.0% LiVO
3
] (Figs. 3, 4). Then, 1D isopleth
KL
waschosen in this 2D section:
K
, [70.0% LiCl + 18.0%Li
2
SO
4
+ 7.2% Li
2
MoO
4
+ 4.8% LiF];
L
, [70.0% LiCl +18.0% Li
2
SO
4
+ 7.2% Li
2
MoO
4
+
4.8%
LiVO
3
](Fig. 5).
From the
KL
phase diagram, we determined , theprojection of the quintuple eutectic point, at which qua-
E*
LiF–LiCl–LiVO
3
–Li
2
SO
4
–Li
2
MoO
4
System
T. V. Gubanova and I. K. Garkushin
Samara State Technical University, Samara, Russia
Received November 30, 2006
Abstract
—Phase equilibria in the LiF–LiCl–LiVO
3
–Li
2
SO
4
–Li
2
MoO
4
system have been studied by differen-tial thermal analysis. The eutectic composition has been determined as follows (mol %): LiF, 17.4; LiCl, 42.0;LiVO
3
, 17.4; Li
2
SO
4
, 11.6; and Li
2
MoO
4
, 11.6, with the melting temperature equal to
363°ë
and the enthalpyof melting equal to (
284
±
7
) kJ/kg.
DOI:
10.1134/S0036023607100269
PHYSICOCHEMICAL ANALYSISOF INORGANIC SYSTEMS
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Vol. 52
No. 10
2007
LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 SYSTEM 1625
Characteristics of invariant points in two-, three-, and four-component subsystems
System Point typeComponent concentration*, mol %
Melting temperature, °C
1 2 3 4
LiF–LiCl [6] Eutectic 29.5 70.5 496
LiF–LiVO3 [7] " 23.0 77.0 573
LiF–Li2SO4 [6] Eutectic 41.0 59.0 530
Peritectic 26.0 74.0 575
LiF–Li2MoO4 [7] Eutectic 38.0 62.0 609
LiCl–Li2VO3 [7] " 55.0 45.0 491
LiCl–Li2SO4 [6] Eutectic 60.5 39.5 485
Peritectic 30.0 70.0 575
LiCl–Li2MoO4 [8] Eutectic 73.4 26.6 501
LiVO3–Li2SO4 [9] " 87.0 13.0 591
LiVO3–Li2MoO4 [10] " 73.0 27.0 533
Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 [6] " 62.0 38.0 581
LiF–LiCl–LiVO3 [11] " 17.0 50.8 32.2 463
LiF–LiCl–Li2SO4 [9] " 25.0 48.0 27.0 445
LiF–LiCl–Li2MoO4 [12] " 19.4 61.3 19.3 436
LiF–LiVO3–Li2SO4 [1] Eutectic 38.0 18.0 44.0 497
Peritectic 3.0 83.0 13.5 575
LiF–LiVO3–Li2MoO4 [13] Eutectic 18.0 53.0 29.0 493
LiF–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 [1] Eutectic 30.1 43.4 26.5 501
Peritectic 1.5 61.0 37.5 575
LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4 [14] " 49.0 38.25 12.75 449
5.5 80.0 14.5 575
LiCl–LiVO3–Li2MoO4 [15] Eutectic 49.5 33.7 16.8 440
LiCl–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 [16] Eutectic 58.5 23.6 17.9 445
Peritectic 7.5 55.0 37.0 575
LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 [13] Eutectic 63.0 15.0 22.0 491
LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4 [9] " 21.5 47.2 15.2 16.1 416
LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2MoO4 [17] " 16.5 47.0 28.8 7.6 387
LiF–LiCl–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 [18, 19] " 16.2 51.5 16.2 16.2 402
LiF–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 [20] " 25.0 43.8 14.8 16.5 428
Lil–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 [11] " 48.5 33.5 3.6 41.4 416
* Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 denote the ordinal numbers of salts in the system.
1626
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 52 No. 10 2007
GUBANOVA, GARKUSHIN
ternary and quinary crystallization lines meet. From thecomposition of the meeting point, the ratio between the
lithium fluoride and lithium metavanadate concentra-tions in the quinary eutectic was derived (Fig. 4).
491°
610°
449°
485°
575°
591°
581°
575°
575°
858°
485° 575°
Li2SO4 LiVO3620°
533°491°
440°
491°LiCl610°
LiF849°
445°530°
575°
Li2SO4858°
575°
530°
445°
501°610°
B
C Li2MoO4702°
533°
A
ACB
501°
496°436°
463°
573° 575° 573°
497°
449°
485° 575°496°
491°609°
493°
573°591°620°
LiVO3
LiVO3LiF449°533°
491°
497°
530°
575°501°
609°
620°
LiCl
LiClD
D
Li2MoO4Li2SO4Li2MoO4702°
581° 581°702°858°
LiF849°
Fig. 1. Development of the subsystems of the LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 system.
445°
402°
436°
445°
c
a
a
B
A
D
b
445°416° 416°
440°449°
387°
436°
C70% LiCl30% Li2SO4
70% LiCl30% LiF
A A70% LiCl
30% LiVO3
70% LiCl30% LiF
70% LiCl30% LiF
70% LiCl30% Li2MoO4
463° 463°
Fig. 2. Phase diagram for isopleth ABCD in the LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 system.
LE3 402°
E2 416°
K
E*
E*
b
a c
70% LiClE1 416°
18% Li2SO412% LiF
70% LiCl18% Li2SO412% Li2MoO4
70% LiCl18% Li2SO412% LiVO3
Fig. 3. Phase diagram of isopleth abc in the LiF–LiCL–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 system.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 52 No. 10 2007
LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 SYSTEM 1627
The consecutive studies of sections b– – (Fig. 5),
– (Fig. 6), and LiCl–E*– (Fig. 7) revealed aconstant component ratio (LiF : LiVO3 : Li2MoO4 :Li2SO4) in quinary eutectic E* and the composition ofthe quintuple invariant point (mol %): LiF, 17.4; LiCl,42.0; LiVO3, 17.4; Li2SO4, 11.6; and Li2MoO4, 11.6.
E* E*
E* E* E*
The eutectic phase reaction is L LiF + LiCl +LiVO3 + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4.
The specific enthalpy of melting for the eutecticcomposition calculated from the results of three mea-surements is 284 kJ/kg.
In summary, we have studied the phase complex ofthe LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 system and
500
1.2
E3 402°
E*
2.4 3.6 4.80
T, °C
L
L + LiCl
L + LiCl + Li2SO4
L + LiCl + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4
LiF + LiCl + LiVO3 + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4
LiVO3, mol % 4.8% LiVO37.2% Li2MoO418% Li2SO470% LiCl
4.8% LiF7.2% Li2MoO418% Li2SO470% LiCl
L + LiF + LiCl + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4
K
L + LiCl + LiVO3 + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4
E2 416°
L
Fig. 4. Phase diagram of isopleth KL in the LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 system.
500
7.2
E*
4.8 3.6 2.4b
T, °CL
L + LiCl
L + LiCl + Li2SO4
L + LiCl + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4
LiF + LiCl + LiVO3 + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4
Li2MoO4,mol %70% LiCl18% Li2SO412% Li2MoO4
6.0
E*
400
500
16
E*
12 10 818
T, °C L
L + LiCl
L + LiCl + Li2SO4
LiF + LiCl + LiVO3 + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4
Li2SO4, mol %70% LiCl18% Li2SO4
14
E*
400
6
Fig. 5. Phase diagram of isopleth b– – in theLiF−LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 system.
E* E* Fig. 6. Phase diagram of isopleth – in the LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 system.
E* E*
1628
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 52 No. 10 2007
GUBANOVA, GARKUSHIN
experimentally determined the composition, meltingtemperature, and enthalpy of melting for the eutecticalloy in the LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 sys-tem. This alloy can be used as a working medium inheat storages [20].
REFERENCES1. T. V. Gubanova and I. K. Garkushin, Zh. Neorg. Khim.
50 (11), 1892 (2005) [Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 50 (11),1772 (2005)].
2. V. P. Evgunov, Vvedenie v termicheskii analiz (Samara)[in Russian].
3. N. A. Vasina, E. S. Gryzlova, and S. G. Shaposhnikova,The Thermophysical Properties of Multinary Salt Sys-tems (Khimiya, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].
4. A. S. Trunin and A. S. Kosmynin, Projective ThermalAnalysis as a Method to Study Heterogeneous Equilibriain Condensed Multinary Systems (Kuibyshev, 1977) [inRussian].
5. The Thermal Constants of Compounds. Handbook,Ed. by V. P. Glushko (VINITI, Mosocw, 1981), Issue10, part 1 [in Russian].
6. Phase Diagrams for Salt Systems, Ed. by V. I. Posy-paiko and E. A. Alekseeva (Metallurgiya, Moscow,1977), Part 3 [in Russian].
7. Melting of Salt Systems. Handbook Ed. by N. K. Vosk-resenskaya (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1961), Vol. 1[in Russian].
8. A. S. Trunin, I. K. Garkushin, A. M. Gasanaliev, andM. A. Dibirov, Izv. Severo-Kavkazsk. Tsentra Vyssh.Shkoly. Estestv. Nauki, No. 3, 53 (1980).
9. Zh. A. Koshkarov, Candidate’s Dissertation in Chemis-try (Inst. of Natural Sciences, Ulan-Ude, 1987).
10. I. N. Belyaev, T. G. Lupeiko, and V. I. Vyalikova,Zh. Neorg. Khim. 20 (9), 2483 (1975).
11. I. K. Garkushin, T. V. Gubanova, A. S. Petrov, andB. V. Anipchenko, Phase Equilibria in Systems of SomeAlkali Metavanadates (Mashinostroenie-1, Moscow) [inRussian].
12. A. I. Sechnoi, I. K. Garkushin, and A. S. Trunin, USSRInventor’s Certificate No. 1274287 (1986).
13. T. V. Gubanova, I. M. Kondratyuk, and I. K. Garkushin,Zh. Neorg. Khim. 50 (12), 2079–2083 (2005) [Russ. J.Inorg. Chem. 50 (12), 1953 (2005)].
14. T. V. Lekomtseva, B. V. Anipchenko, and I. K. Gar-kushin, Zh. Neorg. Khim. 47 (10), 1719 (2002) [Russ. J.Inorg. Chem. 47 (10), 1578 (2002)].
15. B. V. Anipchenko, T. V. Lekomtseva, and I. K. Gar-kushin, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim. Tekh-nol. 41 (6), 134 (1998).
16. T. V. Lekomtseva, B. V. Anipchenko, and I. K. Gar-kushin, Zh. Neorg. Khim. 47 (9), 1548 (2002) [Russ. J.Inorg. Chem. 47 (9), 1418 (2002)].
17. T. V. Gubanova, I. M. Kondratyuk, and I. K. Garkushin,Zh. Neorg. Khim. 51 (3), 522 (2006) [Russ. J. Inorg.Chem. 51 (3), 474 (2006)].
18. I. K. Garkushin, T. V. Gubanova, I. M. Kondratyuk, et al.,RF Patent No. 2004134641 (2004).
19. T. V. Gubanova, E. I. Frolov, and I. K. Garkushin,Zh. Neorg. Khim. 52 (2), 308 (2007) [Russ. J. Inorg.Chem. 52 (2), 265 (2007)].
20. I. K. Garkushin, T. V. Gubanova, I. M. Kondratyuk, et al.,RF Patent No. 2004134642, (2004).
500
90
E*
70 60 50100
T, °C
L
L + LiCl
LiF + LiCl + LiVO3 + Li2SO4 + Li2MoO4
LiCl, mol %80
400
40
600
LiCl
E* 363°
Fig. 7. Phase diagram of invariant section LiCl– –E* inthe LiF–LiCl–LiVO3–Li2SO4–Li2MoO4 system.
E*