Upload
zechariah-hailey
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lidar Data Applications for Natural Resource
Management
Lidar Data Applications for Natural Resource
Management
Tom Bobbe, Mark Finco, Ken Brewer, Denise Tom Bobbe, Mark Finco, Ken Brewer, Denise LaesLaes
USDA Forest ServiceUSDA Forest ServiceRemote Sensing Applications CenterRemote Sensing Applications Center
Salt Lake City, UtahSalt Lake City, Utah
Geospatial 2007 ConferenceGeospatial 2007 ConferenceThursday - May 10, 2007Thursday - May 10, 2007
Tom Bobbe, Mark Finco, Ken Brewer, Denise Tom Bobbe, Mark Finco, Ken Brewer, Denise LaesLaes
USDA Forest ServiceUSDA Forest ServiceRemote Sensing Applications CenterRemote Sensing Applications Center
Salt Lake City, UtahSalt Lake City, Utah
Geospatial 2007 ConferenceGeospatial 2007 ConferenceThursday - May 10, 2007Thursday - May 10, 2007
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Lidar system fundamentals
Resource management applications Digital Terrain Models
Vegetation Models
Lidar applications in the Forest Service
Lidar acquisition specifications
Lidar system fundamentals
Resource management applications Digital Terrain Models
Vegetation Models
Lidar applications in the Forest Service
Lidar acquisition specifications
Fundamentals of LidarFundamentals of Lidar
Lidar Basics: Lidar = Light Detection
And Ranging Scanning Infrared Laser
Rangefinder 80-150 thousand pulses
per second result in typical point densities between 8 per 1-m2 to 1 per 4-m2 (called post spacing)
Multiple returns from a single pulse are possible
Coupled with IMU/GPS provides very accurate X,Y,Z point clouds (~15-cm in Z).
Lidar Basics: Lidar = Light Detection
And Ranging Scanning Infrared Laser
Rangefinder 80-150 thousand pulses
per second result in typical point densities between 8 per 1-m2 to 1 per 4-m2 (called post spacing)
Multiple returns from a single pulse are possible
Coupled with IMU/GPS provides very accurate X,Y,Z point clouds (~15-cm in Z).
Characteristics of Lidar DataCharacteristics of Lidar Data
Point data, but … Large volume of data
Assume: 1 to 4 pulses / m2
Assume: 2 returns per pulse Assume: 6 values per return Equals: 0.38 – 1.52 GB per acre, or
3.71 – 14.84 TB per 10,000 acres Because of data volume
Often standard GIS analyses don’t work Require special pre-processing for analysis
Point data, but … Large volume of data
Assume: 1 to 4 pulses / m2
Assume: 2 returns per pulse Assume: 6 values per return Equals: 0.38 – 1.52 GB per acre, or
3.71 – 14.84 TB per 10,000 acres Because of data volume
Often standard GIS analyses don’t work Require special pre-processing for analysis
Examples of Lidar Point CloudsExamples of Lidar Point Clouds
This lidar point cloud transect crosses a forest roadThis lidar point cloud transect crosses a forest road
In this 3-D perspective of a lidar point cloud note the buildings
Points Colored by Height
Highest
Lowest
Multiple return lidar Multiple return lidar
Multiple return lidar contributes to forest structure measurements
1st return is not just top of canopy
Last (4th) return is not just the ground
First analytical step typically filters ground returns from all returns
Multiple return lidar contributes to forest structure measurements
1st return is not just top of canopy
Last (4th) return is not just the ground
First analytical step typically filters ground returns from all returns
Figures Courtesy of PNW Seattle Laboratory
All Returns
3rd Return
4th Return
2nd Return
1st Return
Primary Application – High Resolution DTMPrimary Application – High Resolution DTM
10-m DEM / 1-m Lidar DTM Comparison10-m DEM / 1-m Lidar DTM Comparison
New and important features are recognizable on the 1-meter digital terrain model (micro-hydrologic patterns, roads / trails, and other man-made features)
New and important features are recognizable on the 1-meter digital terrain model (micro-hydrologic patterns, roads / trails, and other man-made features)
USGS 10-meter Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Lidar-derived 1-m Digital Terrain Model (DTM)
Site ASite A
Site BSite B
Site ASite A
Site BSite B
Comparison AreasComparison Areas
USGS 10-meter Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Lidar-derived 1-m Digital Terrain Model (DTM)
Site A
Site B
DTM’s are just the beginning however …DTM’s are just the beginning however …
Tools are being developed in the Forest Service and commercial sector to extract information about the vegetation
Individual Tree Measurements(potentially height, crown base height, crown diameter depending on crown spacing)
Canopy Height, Cover, Density
Vegetation Structural Characteristics
Fusion SoftwareFusion Software
Developed by USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station (McCaughey, Reutebuch & Andersen)
Originally intended for PNW internal use RSAC agreed to distribute and provide support for FS users
Capabilities include:
View lidar data quickly and easily Handles almost any format of lidar data Creates surfaces (bare earth models (DTMs), canopy surface
models) QA/QC of vendor-processed data Easily measures heights of features Large number of forestry-related measurements And much more…
Developed by USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station (McCaughey, Reutebuch & Andersen)
Originally intended for PNW internal use RSAC agreed to distribute and provide support for FS users
Capabilities include:
View lidar data quickly and easily Handles almost any format of lidar data Creates surfaces (bare earth models (DTMs), canopy surface
models) QA/QC of vendor-processed data Easily measures heights of features Large number of forestry-related measurements And much more…
Fusion TutorialFusion Tutorial
Lidar TutorialLidar Tutorial
USFS PNW’s FUSION SoftwareUSFS PNW’s FUSION Software
Individual Tree MeasurementsIndividual Tree Measurements
Lidar and ground measurements relationships Lidar and ground measurements relationships
Fitted : LNMAXHT + LNMEANHT + LNCV + LNP25 + LNP50 + LNP90 + LND
LN
H40
0 1 2 3 4 5
01
23
45
Dominant height (r 2 = 0.98)
Figures Courtesy of PNW Seattle Laboratory
Strong relationships with ground measured variables
Height, Basal Area, Volume, Crown Bulk Density, etc.
Relationships verified by numerous researchers
McGaughy, Reutebuch & Andersen (USFS PNW)
Hudak and Evans (USFS RMRS) Lefsky (Colorado State) Evans (Mississippi State) Wynne (Virginia Tech) Popescu (Texas A&M) Naesset (Norway) Many others …
Strong relationships with ground measured variables
Height, Basal Area, Volume, Crown Bulk Density, etc.
Relationships verified by numerous researchers
McGaughy, Reutebuch & Andersen (USFS PNW)
Hudak and Evans (USFS RMRS) Lefsky (Colorado State) Evans (Mississippi State) Wynne (Virginia Tech) Popescu (Texas A&M) Naesset (Norway) Many others …
Lidar Applications in the USFSLidar Applications in the USFS
Recent tally of lidar applications in the USFS(Lachowski and Reutebuch)
Recent tally of lidar applications in the USFS(Lachowski and Reutebuch)
More detail and full report at http://fsweb.rsac.fs.fed.us/documents/0073-RPT2.pdf
More detail and full report at http://fsweb.rsac.fs.fed.us/documents/0073-RPT2.pdf
Lidar Mission SpecificationsLidar Mission Specifications
Wide lidar usage (in resource mapping) is just in its infancy
Like aerial photos – specifications are linked to information requirements
Currently no industry standards for specific applications
2 Areas to specify Acquisition specs Processing and Delivery
specs
Wide lidar usage (in resource mapping) is just in its infancy
Like aerial photos – specifications are linked to information requirements
Currently no industry standards for specific applications
2 Areas to specify Acquisition specs Processing and Delivery
specs
GovernmentGovernment
VendorVendor
Sp
ecs
QA
/ QC
Lidar Specifications – AcquisitionLidar Specifications – Acquisition
Acquisition Specifications Point density (post spacing)
DTM -> based on vertical accuracy requirements Vegetation Applications
1.5 point per square meter absolute minimum 4-6 points per square meter are preferable
Specify whether collected leaf on or leaf off Multiple returns per pulse Maximum 15-degree off nadir scan angle unfiltered data Flight lines should have 50% “side lap” (30% minimum) Cross flights for calibration Attributes delivered: X, Y, Z, Intensity, Scan Angle, Return
# High resolution digital imagery (if possible)
Acquisition Specifications Point density (post spacing)
DTM -> based on vertical accuracy requirements Vegetation Applications
1.5 point per square meter absolute minimum 4-6 points per square meter are preferable
Specify whether collected leaf on or leaf off Multiple returns per pulse Maximum 15-degree off nadir scan angle unfiltered data Flight lines should have 50% “side lap” (30% minimum) Cross flights for calibration Attributes delivered: X, Y, Z, Intensity, Scan Angle, Return
# High resolution digital imagery (if possible)
Lidar Specifications – Processing and DeliveryLidar Specifications – Processing and Delivery
Vendor Processing and Delivery Specifications Lidar data delivered in overlapping tiles GIS dataset of the tiling system GIS dataset of the flight lines Report on GPS ground station locations Geographic projection information (including
vertical datum) Heights should be orthometric heights Report that lists all files delivered Optional:
Tiled points filtered for bare earth returns A high resolution DTM
Vendor Processing and Delivery Specifications Lidar data delivered in overlapping tiles GIS dataset of the tiling system GIS dataset of the flight lines Report on GPS ground station locations Geographic projection information (including
vertical datum) Heights should be orthometric heights Report that lists all files delivered Optional:
Tiled points filtered for bare earth returns A high resolution DTM
Approximate Costs of AcquisitionApproximate Costs of Acquisition
Basic Data Collection and Post-processing Depends on study area size
($0.50 -$2.50/acre for 1M – 15k acres) ~$1/acre for a 250K acre project
Raw lidar data Bare earth First surface
Basic Data Collection and Post-processing Depends on study area size
($0.50 -$2.50/acre for 1M – 15k acres) ~$1/acre for a 250K acre project
Raw lidar data Bare earth First surface
Mobilization $8k – $15k
Administration Project and flight planning Weather contingency Pre-collection tasks
Mobilization $8k – $15k
Administration Project and flight planning Weather contingency Pre-collection tasks
Advanced Processing Additional $3 – $7/acre
Canopy cover Tree height Forest biomass Other vegetation derivatives
Advanced Processing Additional $3 – $7/acre
Canopy cover Tree height Forest biomass Other vegetation derivatives
Summary Summary
Lidar is an exciting (relatively) new technology Provides measurements! Vegetation structural information are its strengths Existing research provides a strong foundation
Lidar processing requires special skills/tools Data volume can be an issue Specialized software (not just ESRI products)
required for efficient large scale analysis Lidar missions
Specifications becoming better understood Still expensive, but costs coming down Multiple resource applications & consortia allow for
cost sharing
Lidar is an exciting (relatively) new technology Provides measurements! Vegetation structural information are its strengths Existing research provides a strong foundation
Lidar processing requires special skills/tools Data volume can be an issue Specialized software (not just ESRI products)
required for efficient large scale analysis Lidar missions
Specifications becoming better understood Still expensive, but costs coming down Multiple resource applications & consortia allow for
cost sharing