30
Libraries in the Information Age Improving Library Feedback Library Connect , November 2016 Ruarri Rogan, [email protected] Solutions Enablement

Libraries in the Information Age - concert.stpi.narl.org.twconcert.stpi.narl.org.tw/year/file/Ruarri Rogan_Elsevier.pdf · Libraries in the Information Age . ... Questions our customers

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

| 1 | 1 | 1

Libraries in the Information Age Improving Library Feedback

Library Connect , November 2016 Ruarri Rogan, [email protected] Solutions Enablement

| 2 | 2 | 2

Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins

2

AGENDA

Part 1

Part 2

|

Feedback: the library as brain

3

| 4 | 4 | 4

Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins

4

AGENDA

Part 1

Part 2

|

The Need for Feedback

| 6

| 7

| 8

| 9

| 10

| 11 | 11 | 11

Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins

11

AGENDA

Part 1

Part 2

|

1. Help me understand and communicate value of

your products 2. Help me generate stories to share with my

community of researchers and students. 3. Help me stay up to date with new developments

and offerings.

12

Questions our customers tell us that they’re faced with:

| 13 | 13 | 13

13

Usage reports Value stories Inst. Insights

1. COUNTER usage reports. Being a founding member Elsevier has always supported COUNTER and reported in a compliant way via our website and SUSHI protocol Since 2002

2. Personalised value analytics Multiple metrics regarding research outcomes at institutional level using the power of Scopus. Since 2012

3. Product Insights for Customers. Free personalised value analytics at institutional level using the power of Scopus, Mendeley and big data analytics From now on

Product Insights for Customers

14

Product Insights for Customers

| 15 | 15 | 15

Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins

15

AGENDA

Part 1

Part 2

| 16 | 16 | 16

16

Future Developments

Value communication

Story Telling & Education

Update on new tools & content

Near future widgets

Scopus Backfile Subject

Collections Mendeley

| 17 | 17 | 17

Who Gets to Access E-PIC?

17

Scopus Product

ScienceDirect Product

SciVal Product

Other products

Mendeley Institutional

Edition

ScienceDirect Value metrics

Scopus Value

metrics

SciVal Value

metrics

Other product Value

metrics

Mendeley Value

metrics

Paid Product

Offerings for end users

Complementary engagement analytics for subscribing purchasers

Elsevier suite of information solutions

| 18 | 18 | 18

Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins

AGENDA

Part 1

Part 2

| 19 | 19 | 19

“In 2013… 13% of citations were to articles >= 20 years old… an increase of 36% since 1990... Now that finding and reading relevant older articles is about as easy as finding and reading recently published articles, significant advances aren’t getting lost on the shelves and are influencing work worldwide for years after.”

Google Inc., November 2014

New technology opens up older content

| 20 | 20 | 20

Trends in backfiles “Literature Citations in the Internet Era,”

“Although many factors affect citation practices, two things are clear: Researchers are increasingly relying on older science, and citations are increasingly dispersed across a larger proportion of papers and journals” Larivière et al., in Literature Citations in the Internet Era, Science, 2009

| 21 | 21 | 21

The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007

| 22 | 22 | 22

Trends in backfiles

0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 3000000 3500000 4000000

Veterinary Science and Veterinary MedicinePublic Health and Health Policy

MathematicsCell Press

Inorganic ChemistryDecision Sciences

The LancetEconomics, Econometrics and Finance

Immunology and MicrobiologyHigh Energy/Nuclear Physics and Astronomy

Business, Management and AccountingEnergy and Power

Pharmacology, Toxicology and PharmaceuticsChemical Engineering

Organic ChemistrySocial Science

Computer SciencePsychology

NeurosciencePhysical and Analytical Chemistry

Environmental SciencePhysics General

Earth and Planetary SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences

Engineering and TechnologyMaterials Science

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyMedicine and Dentistry

Turnaways By Backfile Subject Package - Global - 2015

| 23 | 23 | 23

Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins

AGENDA

Part 1

Part 2

| 24 | 24 | 24

Hypothesis 1: Technology has reinvigorated history

| 25 | 25 | 25

Hypothesis 1: Technology has reinvigorated history Elsevier’s Investment in rescue & digitisation of classic content

Case in point: The Lancet – Volume 1, Number 1, 1823

| 26 | 26 | 26

Hypothesis 2a: Some ideas are ahead of their time ‘aka Sleeping beauties’

The Sleeping Beauty L.J. Romans, Physics Letters B • Published in 1986 • Article only cited 10 years after publication • Then cited intensively more than 60 times

The Prince J. Polchinski, Physics Review Letters 75 Published in 1995 Picked up Romans’ articles

| 27 | 27 | 27

Hypothesis 2b: Technology is not always ready for science

| 28 | 28 | 28

Hypothesis 3: It’s an issue of funding

“a growing cited half-life might also reflect major structural shifts in the way science is funded and the way scientists are rewarded. A gradual move to fund incremental and applied research may result in fewer fundamental and theoretical studies being published. Giving credit to these founders may require authors cite an increasingly aging literature.” Phil Davies

| 29 | 29 | 29

Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins

AGENDA

Part 1

Part 2

| 30 | 30 | 30

Thank you! For queries about E-PIC, speak to me afterward, or e-mail me at [email protected]