LIBERI v TAITZ (E.D. PA) - 147 - EXHIBITS by deft ORLY TAITZ - pdf.147.0

8/8/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ (E.D. PA) - 147 - EXHIBITS by deft ORLY TAITZ - pdf.147.0

1/58

l1j2i/2()10 13 44 94S1SB1603 GRLVlAITl IiCB2l:l fl 001/058

Exhibit 1

, ,

Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 147 Filed 10/21/10 Page 1 of 58


2/58

1 0 1 2 ~ / 2 ( l 1 : , l '8.44 134:;1:6137603 l J R ~ ..vTA:::TZ #01129 P (102/058f'wd: Fw: How abO!os

May ,_ you _ ..... Se


3/58

.' NOtapild

._Fw:

-.10/21/2(;:0 13:!l5 943ie87S03 ORLYT!\ITZ itCB22 p, OC3/059Fwd- Fw: How a this one Jim? -lnbox - YaIloo! Mall P"S.loIJI

IHI.w._ .,J,,,,,, __ Help"hEdor.. MAIL~ - " M a i l Plus - ~ . ~ + C ; ; ~ ' ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ; ~ ~ r ' -

-- . "---".-". - - ~ . - ~ .

* ~ r " ~ " tei1:zoffloesut com ___ friday, Octyahoo.""", From: Mony'TlJ;it.t' < Q J 1 y _ ~ W g m a i l m m >

,. ".- _.. .. - - -,.- . ' " - ~ -... ",niiOX (372JiJDrafIl; (49) ISent --F.......__ -Spam(262) I From: Nell SANI\EY


4/58

10/21/26 10 13:45 949 1 667803 ORLYTAITZ #OS2il p, 004;':150 Fwd: Fw: How 'iut Jhis_ Jim? - Inbox - Yahool MlIiI Page 3 of3

t4O'OCE. W;< ~ J M l I " ' B I i l b " " ' I M 1M" iobWll mM'i.. f!cw ........ww ~ l ___ ",m.'3O{ ~ ~ A b I M : ~ M5.

'H , ... ... ,.......... , T1 /



5/58

10/21/2010 13:45 8487887803 ORLYTAITZ #0829 P 005/058

Exhibit 2



6/58

the COUIrtroql/ll

Signed~ ..

.

I'

10/21/2010 13 45 9497667603 ORLVTAITZ #0829 P 006/058

, Affidavit of Edgar S. Hale l it1. My nan . is Edgar S. Hale11f. I am over 18 years ok( I am a resident ofTeXllS, I not suffer from any menial impairment or disease, I havepersonal of the following : .,1. I p e n ; ~ l l y s:;rw Usa Uberi on AUgust 7,2009 during an emergencymotion 'ng in Liberi efiil v Tallz et al In front ofHonorable JudgeEduardo in the U.S. Federal District Court , Eastern DisIrict ofiPensylava ia .2. Usa U " who is depided on the attached mug shot, is the same UsaLiberi, who present at the hearing, and who stated in her complaint.

Usa Liberi. convicted in California, that she is a differentwoman, an Innocent woman. residing in Pennsylvania, whowas defarnecIby the nts.3. During hearing, Which was open to the public, which included severalobservers, no driver's license nor any other documentswere given toJudge R o I ~ 1 O by eiIta" Usa Liberi or Iler attorney Phitip BeIg.4. Lisa' . and Phitip Berg left the courtroom at the same time as I left

under the penalty of petjurythe 8"' day ofOctober, 2010d c l ~

thiS Ihe 8"' day of October, 2010, appeared Edgar S. Hale III,who signed this document in my presence .

. - iliiQliiui--- .. ......... - .

; : O O O / Z O O O ~ 6906ltt90S XVd 9S:g1 Ol06 0118



7/58


8/58

10121/2010 '3 45 9491861803 OflLvlAITZ #0825 P.OOE/058

Exhibit 3



9/58

lC/21/2010 13 45 34E

. . . . defameddr - .o

1. My name is caren Siei Hale. I am aver 18 years aid, lam a resIcIent ofT_, do not SIllIerfrom any_In .....' '_ ordioe. . . ., I '- " " " " " ' " ~ o f l h e :,1. I perIIOIl8Ityrsaw Usa Uberi on Augu$I 7, 200IiI dIIrir1g an eme


10/58

1(/21120'0 010/C5Bt0929 p

'd'_

f. "

':"



11/58

10/21/2C'O 13 46 S487$S1803 :nu \11 AIIZ :09:::9 l' _011/059

Exhibit 4



12/58

10/21/2010 13 46 9451657603 OilL YfAIfl #C823 P Dl2/C5S

AffIdavit ofDr. OrivTalU. ESQ,I, orty Taitz, .fn an attorney, licensed In th e State of Q\1ifQm1a. 9'" cirrult courtof appeals. ThirdCimlit Court lof Appeals and admltted to practice before the Supreme COort of the UnitedStates. In l h ~ above action I represent myself and Defend Our freedoms Foundation, where Iserve as the P r e ~ i d e n t . I am over 18 years okl, do not suffer from any mental impairment, haveI"""""",IImo\l'ledge of the foregoing facts and declare under penolty of perju


13/58

10/?1/201J 13 9 ~ S 7 g e 1 8 0 8 Ofll'tTATTZ flC82fJ P 013/058I

p r o ~ s state residence based on evidence and lacts. Utle,; never provided anyeviden , to prove her .Ilegations, that she is resident of PA. ' " ;ucb the " " " needs 10be issod.

12. On JU* 30 2010 Uberi and Berg fiied an opposition to my motion, wile,.. tbey statedthat J u ~ e Robreno's statement RUbert is a resident of Pennsylvania' in his June 6, 2010orderWas baSiQd on vital records.. tholt sh e SUbmitted to judge Rohreno during 08.07.09e m . r g ~ " c y hring. Liben specifically mtnd that they provided her driver's Ii

ator Sankey and sworn affldavrts by Caren and Ed Hale, who tdantlfied Uberi l!\Sth e man, who appeared before judge Robt1!nn 00 08.07.09In Liberi v T.itz and thesame raph . . . . identified by tiberi 's arresting officer Monrison, as one convictedin CA. I am additionally submitting tlberf. recent mug shot, whid> claarly shows that itis t h ~ same person, who _B r ed before judge Robn!no on 08.07.1l!t and I ams u b m ~ i n g an e-mail from her prosecuting distritt Attorney James Secordt assistantDistridt Atlemey 01 th e San Bernardino County CA. verifying that this is i n d ~ the mugshot ~ u s a Ubtri, Convicted in CA and not allowed to reside in any other state, but CAand N aecording tt) terms of her probation. t forwarded Uberfs Mug shot to ED and C8renH . a J e ~ ,ho Signed sworn affidaVfts that the woman on this mug shot IS il'ldeed Usa Uberl, whoappea,ed b@fore judge f i u b r ~ n o 01'\ OS.07.09 for emelP'flCY hearing in Uberf et aI v Taltz et ai,clalmi,", that she is an ioooCflntWOJru;ln residing in PA# who was newr oomricted of any crimes.who . . . . defamed by the dei\Inda"" and who cannot unseal har PA license because shais arr.J; for ker tim ,,17.1 filed the motioIl, demanding ,eIe..., of Uberi'. license with the proper purpose toasce+in Libe,,', stale rsskIen


14/58

1C/21/2010 18-41 9421661603 ORL'tTAHZ #(;829 P ()14/0S8I

18. , p r a letter from Joff Staples .nd Affidavit from unda _ with the _p u of showing that the plaintiffs and Libeti .,. refusing to provi


15/58

10/21/2010 13 47 8497887803I

22. The ImOW" aImlnal in tills action I. Usa Liberi, who mastem'linded ,his frtvolousand nfHdOUS a c t i o n ~ in order to intimidate the whlstte: blower and avoidrwooajoo'n of her probatiOn.

I declare und r tile penalty of perjury, and under tlIe law, f the state of CA ,hot .11 of theabove is true d correct and to the best of my k n ~ d g e Slgti . , ~ . Dr.OrlyTait1,rSU10.20.10 I

4beri vr.az 101)7.10Affldavit afOriv Taitt

http:///reader/full/10.20.10http:///reader/full/10.20.10


16/58

10/21/2010 12:47 8497GS7S0j ORL VT AIiI #0929 P 018/05S

I

Exhibit 5



17/58

10/21/2010 13 47 94S1S87B03 ~ R l V T i \ I i Z #0829 P 011/05916/21/2010 13;.{$ FAX', ijJ 001,,

Eastern ~ c ofPennsylvaniaCase N . 2-09-cv-01898 ECR

L

S. Belcher, appearing Pro Se in lhis action. I residE< at 201 ParI$ 6t.,

. . I am infonning !he court that Berg hU not semod _ withI,copiee1any of his pleadings for over a yooar including those flied -V.I QIlIy oovr healsay infarmation about spurio\l$ acouaations Berg oontinues tomake ~ i n s t me. Illy ConstiIuIioneJ tfghts COlItinue to lievkiIIItIId 'Y Berg under the 14" AmendI1lent II> Due procesg !I!ld EqualProI!i!CIi \he court clet!


18/58

10/2'/2610 13,47 S497E67603 '0929 P 01Sn6F.10/2l/2GI0 1 ~ ! 4 S @loOZ

they""" 1eIe, or _ e


19/58

COI'IYieIed'

person

10/21/2010 13: ' : 94$7687803 O R ~ YTAITl 1t0929 P 0 HI/C58101%1/2010 13:45 1i!I,

this court, or ever mMUfaetUl't!d any evidence!Libeti,+ Berg and 1Jwir wiInessIagents have defamed me, alleging Iwas IImlnel wIlo wfV9C! I!TnG in prison _ an _ ,..,.,.,.a goinQ backI have numerous Climlna! aliase8, that I was evicied sevmal times

fnarlied 10 times, alleging lenibIe lhlngs, ere,. eIe. Uberi OOIlVInced a9 1Jw alias Dr Ron PoIari< whose !rue _ is Ron Pollard It> make

one or poIIIS online acouelng me of havlng " record I t block long! A formermoderaIo of 86rg's website whom Uberi banned (and Berg blamed me of" s t e a l i n g " ~ ) posted the lin!< on my webSite to the site wheno PolaIIk's,!rue j was 1'e'ie8/ed and then Berg blamed me of e>cpOSing himl They hawI!lIseIy imed I spent aD of 2004 in prison When Iwas doing radio shows taII


20/58

Slrebe!'iII

10/21/2010 :3 47 9487B&1603 JRLYTAIll #(1829 P 020/05810/21/Z010 13:4$ FAl IlJU04

me she was manually entering credit card transactionsfor Betg'so b a l T J a ( ~ I S ..com website while we were on the phone. Uberi had TOTAlCONTR and ACCESS 10 this inf


21/58

10/21/2013 13.'8 8481BG7S03 tlRll''rAITZ #0228 P 021j05f.11'0/21/:24'110 13:46 PAX ItJ005

home with his wife afKI then t l) the consIab!!i> on his cell phone wIIoIs I i hatm/68.s /eddy bearwOOgm _ a lot, butw-.'tdo

anythfngf ' \ mrnembef" QhIIIIng oommant Llberi made t l) Adams t l) "IlU$I/IWand do as say I've done /his beforo. 1110 case was dropped, so I tool< no

,ful'\ller actJ:m. lJberi told me she had also called the sheriff in Welfington, TX:::jhe laughed and basically aid simAar lI'Iings about Hale beingPlaintiff's their wiInesse$ are maIdng wtkiaccusations of f u r " " " , hatmwIl/ch smJ"y does not exist. UfJellIIIIId the 0/henJ__ beet> In anydanger. eIIy Sflebel's a f f l d a v ~ I$I1ea/$ay and must be disrega!tled. AdamsaI!IdavIt Is hearsay and must be dlsMgarded.

V11.

Your rvIad that L1berl rwsitIM in PA. All we csnligure 8$ the besI$ forthat I$lhat the drivers Iioens& lJberi claims t l) have shown Your HOIlOfmust he been issued by PA In on:Ief tl)r Your Honor t l) maJ\e $\lOll anl!O!I'OI1eoUO!l stalement I do have direct knowledge of Llberfs resldence. Her

,iandrme 't"" phone number, !$sued In the name of her hooband Brent Uberlappea10n my call"'r id and we spoke every day, numeroustirnee.1twas not aPA ph""" number. The pacQge I _ shipped t l) lJbef j and anlved at her home

day air. It was NOT sent to PA. Libell does not reside in PA.V111.

at first t l)

ilia

http:///reader/full/tirnee.1thttp:///reader/full/tirnee.1thttp:///reader/full/tirnee.1t


22/58

for Berg

10!21/2Q10 13 40 9497987603 OfLVTAITI #092E P_022/05810/21/2010 1 ~ : 4 6 III 006

she opened the third Paypa! """",,


23/58

10/2 1/2010 13:48 9 ~ 8 7 6 B 7 G 0 3 ORLHAlT! #0523 P 023/05810/21/2010' U:4fi FAlj ~ O ( ) 7

any ollIS n these _ OCCUlTed. This ohat _ saved on my computermonths beiofe Imade CO/Itact with the HaI6$ in May 2009 after SIIIVice of thethis suit

IooI!18ic$ exomlflalion of my oompU!er will show that ohat (and manyother i i1ems) ware all _ en my ""mlmler LONG befono there Iknew the'1- even .. problem_'"" mEl and Berg or UbEIIi. Sbebel knows Ihave very oomputer tedmQIogioal skills. His ClaIm Iforged eVidence ISfalse. I ldn'l begin \() know how 10 do !he Ihlngs he cIainlI> I forged.

XI.

l!erg's, "s and Slrebel's Insane allegations _ ins t Dr TIIibt areludicrou&.Though I not inllOl\Ied with Taitz em a felIUlar ba.... for lhls suit. I have_ . anylhlnllin her behavior to cause me to doubt her integrity, Of

IpmfessiOnptl ethics. In fact, she htIs always s!n!ssed caution and VaCiIy inmy repHes/1O this court, especially EII'I1p/1asIzin I dfffemntiale betwee!>_1know ortkl PfO"& to be true Of false versus whatImerely believIod.This is in contrast to events I have wltnessed fltslIumd. How easily Bergs_ to ' Is to the ooW1$lhat he knows or oI1oold ~ n o w are untrue andvIcIoUSly efames people. In my opinion, and I've koown Be!!! sinoEl1998. I've

plafesslotjally and ethically bankropt He should be disbaITed and in\Ie$IigatEId.for felony . ury. fraud OI1lhe court, conspiracy to commit SS ftaud, actual Ss



24/58

lC!21/20'O 18 46 64B'S7833 ORL,'7,\rz k0028 P 024/05810/%1/2010 13:4$ F IilIMS

and abetting a convicted felon in violating the terms of her probationthis felon to IIave III:008S to supporters credit cald infotmaIIon and

donatio....;1 pray Your Honor refers this case to the SUpremeCourt of PAboaro for lO


25/58

defmudirights to

1CJ21/201C 13:49 9491887803 O ~ l ' i T A I T l #Ol?29 P 025/058iglOOS101',1,.,. 13,'7 F'1I,

l l t / I l 1 8 d ~ r t N ... not plaln!lll's. Your Honor must !>Old Berg_b le for!he PA courts and defendants, and violating my Constitutional

Process and Equal Protection in not serving me caples of his

,I, Linda 8.1Belcher, do he!lIby solemnly swear 10 the following. that Jam over theage of 21 1'8, that all statemenm In thts doc:urne!lt _! lUe and """""* 10 !hebest of knowIeodge made under penalty of perjury IiICCOIdlng to the laws of theSliM of l ' wheIe I reside.

L i n d o S , ~ c{J.d:, la! ,() ,9J0date ! I,' ~ ~ ; ~ ~



26/58

1 0 / 2 ' 1 2 ~ 1 0 13 43 949

Exhibit 6



27/58

;0/2112(nO 13 43 L91S67SC3 CRLYTAIT! ~ O S 2 a F 027!;)S81 0 f O S / 2 0 1 ~ 15;28 81916S1603 IlRlVTAITZ l0170P,001l01t

1 2 3

5 6 7 II ,

10 11 12 13

1$ 16 1.7 18 19 20 21 22 23 . 24

26 . ~ . .:r, \- . 27 28

, .! .,,

S U P E R ~ R COURT OF THE STATS OF CALlPORNIAFer 'III! COUl'lTY OP SAl'! BERNARDINO

;- D E P A R ~ T 3: . HOtr. JOlIN M. PAc:asco. JUDGE. I ,;;- PEOPLE olii TIIB STAT!< ) rr C1ILU'ORllIJI/, ): I Pla in t i f f . ) SIlPIlIUOR COUR11i lI ) CASE NO, PSB-044914 I ;

lSA uLBERI 1'CRARDSON. l Defendant. ) * . - ~ - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - )

TRANSCRIPT OP PR8LIMINARY HEARINGANP ~ I L / O R HEARINGAUGUST 4. 20Q4

i T:RR PROPJ8!t MIC1IAl!L RAMOSI ~ i s t % 1 c t AttorneyBY. JAllIiiS SECOIWI Deputy District Attoruey

1 . I IIDI M.O. PlIAL'rD D B I 1 ~ ' I : ' I Attorney at Law

I i . I; I ~ P Q R T E I ) BY: I COLLEBN sOUTHWICK CSR-RPR NO .. 9949 , " !.."",



28/58

10/21/2010 13 48 9437667603 ORl.'lTCTZ 40829 P. 028/058,1 ; ) / 0 6 / ~ ( l l ( 1 15.30 S 4 ~ . 7 6 8 ? M 3 OfllVT,tITl .t0110 1'>.0021018

. - . 1

789

10111213141516171819202122I I I

242526272$

23 . lltOA R . O " , , ~ 45

i INDEX OF WITNESSES

,roect ~ i l t i o n by Mr. Secord~ o s a ~ B X a m ~ n ~ t ~ o n by Mr. Faal~ d i r ~ c e E x a m i n a ~ i o n by Mr. Secord~ r ~ c t axam;1ltion by Seqardi + - ! l . ! i . , . J , o I ~ J ! . I D~ r ~ c t Examination by ~ r . Secord~ r e c t E x a m l ~ t i o n (Cont'd) by Mr.. s s - E x a ~ i n a t i o n by Mr. Faal~ i r ~ c t Exa1ination by Mr. Secord~ ~ ! I I I ! ! ~ Y ~ _ I"irect Eltami a t i on by Mr. secord~ & a - B x a ~ i n t ion by Mr. 7 ~ a l jod!T""t ! l rQ nation by Mr _ se"ord.

';

o T ~ $ s ~ E x a m nat ion by MI. Faal' ther Redi ea t ExamiMtion by 'Mr.COTTMEHR~ r e c t KxamirlatiQn by Mr. ~ a a l - ~ S S - E x a m ~ n t ion by M r ~ Secord.di reo t Rxa ' na t ion by M r ~ Faal1 t c r o ~ u J - E X na t i on by K r. Secord

tner R e d i ~ t E x a ~ i ~ t i o n by Mr.~ r e c t Bxami at ian by Mr. Secord,rosa-Bxamin t ion by Mr. Vaa1I:)lrrect Exam! atlon by Mr. SecQrOF o s s - E x a ~ n t ion by M ~ . Faal

)i ,

PAGE

I'

Secord

secord

Faal

279

11 '

1S37404662GO82849690lH

100102103

10510a

, ..

http:///reader/full/i+-!l.!i.,.J,oI~J!.IDhttp:///reader/full/i+-!l.!i.,.J,oI~J!.ID


29/58

1 0 / 2 ~ / 2 0 1 0 '3 '48 9497807003 OfLYIA:rz 10823 P,02E/05310/0SIZ0'0 15:S. 9 ' ~ i e e l e . 3 (l:RtTAITl 1t1?,> P,l)OCSlfltg

',...

1 4! COURT! S i r t dQ you have - ha s ol:Ii bondI2 poata4 on t . h ~ Ms. L i s a ~ ~ n e e R i c h a ~ d s o n caSe? 3 4 u t I 'm not he previoue bOnding compahy. 5 By the w a y ~ my name i s Scott Mehr with StevenG oot;; t " eh . Sri lbonds.. 7 MR. p ~ ~ : CAn you te l l the judge _ 8 MRI SECORD: Why don't have him come to 9 stand, p ~ e a a e .

10 : I SCOT!' !onds.

http:///reader/full/be.b.a.llhttp:///reader/full/be.b.a.ll


30/58

91

1 0 / 2 ~ / 2 0 1 3 '3 49 8497887303 ORLVTAITZ -tOfl2S p 1J30}05B1 0 / 0 t j 2 0 1 ~ 15:30 9491GS7603 URLVTAllZ 10110 tl'_O(l4,ora

12356789'

1112131415

17

202122232425262728

( l . IJ your company willing and prepared to post 00


31/58

10/21/2010 13.48 9 ~ 8 7 8 S 1 8 0 3 ORLYTAlTZ ItCa2S P 031/050tO/OG/20l0 , 15 ;30 94 76S76'f/3 ! ' ) ~ I . " ' U ; I n ; tQ710 P.005I018

12

J4

789

1011121314

17 18 19

2425262728

1 92o. B'r :MR. PAAL: N n w ~ have you "received:' payment,o r ~ h i a $28 "020'1We Ihave r ~ c e i v e d the $8,010 payment via a 4edit Qaxd irom the defendant 'a mother. Me hove a

~ p y of a Ch,Ck being sent tQ for $9,5UQ via her It torney, A t ~ o r n e y Strickland, ~ n d a $4.$QO check being

ent when shJ returns from vaea.t.ion tn one week.OkJy . The $9,500 is cheek earning f.om

1vi l a t t o r n ~ y , Michel le $ t r i c k l ~ n d , am I c Q ~ ~ . c ~ ? A. C o ~ r e c t . 2 . d id M B ~ Strickland provide you with

(bc:!umentatior t.o :;,how wht're she obta ined t .hat money1m..?

A. ' las, ahe did.I l . Di( t.be doCUl'tlQnt indica te t h a t M s ~ Liber i had

, &coeived on a c i ~ i l ease she has from a.mdlng ,,A.

Q. :::, tne f u n d 1 n ~ company provided advaftoestp ta l l ing m o r ~ than $ ~ O , O O O ?

{If

F


32/58

' O / 2 1 / 2 0 ~ O 13:49 849 7 687603 DfLV TAn z: #01329 p, 032/05Bl Q I O B I 2 0 1 ~ 15:30" 1&1G03 ORlYTAttl IOTfO' p. (lOS/OHI

r + - - - - + - ~ ~ ~ .. ~ - - - ~ - - - ~ ~ _ _ ,I 1 roceeda M. -!1.ibri col lects from her 1 ~ w 8 u i t t

2 1\ , correct.Io. Okry . So t h a t ' s where th e $ 9 ~ 5 0 0 w a ~ comingrom. The $ ~ . S O O i s a l so coming from M s ~ Str ickland '8

5 ' ' 'Ilene t rus t j aCcol IDt; am I correc t?.A . corre.et.

7 A n ~ t h a t ' s Also coming f r Q ~ the a ~ v . n c e that8 e . L ;ber i ~ t c e i v e d ? 9 A. Correc t .

10 Q o.ly. Thank you.11 about did you receive an addi t iona l

6 ~ O O O fvom r. ~ i ~ r i t 8 fa ther?I. A. Ye .~ , 1.4 2. O k r Y ~ And whAt 's hilil name? Is i t : John

J.5 iclUlt:daon? I 16 A. I think it i s . f don' t'. know i I have thAt17 ivce of p&ptr with me. We have not r ~ c @ i v e d theh e e k ~ He it in the mail so r have n o t phyeical ly

. t the c h e c ~ back. IQ. aUf he has promised to send you the $5,000121 A. c Q h e c t ~ 22 MRt BAAL: Okay. Okay. Thank you. I have33 thlZl9 : u . r t : p e r ~ I .

THE COURT: Cross.M R ~ StokO: . Thank yQU, y Q ~ ~ Honor.26 I27 Ii8

http:///reader/full/corre.ethttp:///reader/full/corre.et


33/58

10/2' /2010 "3 49 9497667603 JRL'1iAI';Z #082& P.038/05B1Ci/08/201Q 15:3{) 9 . ~ 1 a e 1 6 ~ a ORtvTAtrz fo"Uo P , O Q 1 t I ) H ~

n - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - _ ~ _ _ _ _ .._,941

23 Q. M r ~ Nehr, have you contactftd Mr. (inaudible)4 t Inland g n ~ r g 1 e 8 , LLC?

A. :WO; I have not.Q. YO've not spokan to him about the trueness

7 aCcurateness of t h ~ d Q ~ u m e n t n you r . c ~ i v e d from

A.

,12 A. N a ~ i o n & r AUt:omohile and Ca'Gualty In$urance 13 ny which, is now Internat ional Pidel i ty Insuranc. 14 _ n y . lS Q. At'4f you awat'e: of w ~ $ t b e r o r noe t hey Mve an1. reement on ifi le with the Department o f Insu.rance17 I arding t he l r !:>aU pr@trtiu;m for matters ove::r;18 OO? i,19 A. Yet!.I20 j Q, W h ~ t that agreement?,A. TbEiy n " cOlru1\issioned thLough t:he Department.22 Insurance .0 percent.23 o. N o ~ ~ you are writing th i s for l e . ~ than 1024 rcent?25 A. Co*,ect.

Q. N ~ t with regard ehe $ 8 t O O O ~ you said that,27 t ~ s e ~ ~ i n ~ from a credi t card advance from th $28 fendant 'B m p t h ~ r ? - i t - - - - - - - - - - ~ _________.___....________________________.__________,

I', I,



34/58

1012112010 "3 49 9491BB1BC3 aRL r " I l l #3829 P 034/05014/o,S12010 15:30 ,. ,76ST803 tlRlYUnZ '0170. 9.002/01

95f . 1 A. Cqrrect,

Q, o ~ Y . And tha t a d v a n c ~ i s L o ~ the purpose of ,3 the $1QO,OOq bai l , correet?,,." C q r re d t ,

Add you w ~ r e aware t h a ~ t he re ' s a 1 2 7 S ~ 1 .6 :order in p l * e \It'ith respec t to that . a d V ~ e , correc t?'1 .7 A. Cq,t':t:1!tct Q, OJ


35/58

10/21/2010 13 43 94978703 DRlVTAITZ #0823 P 035/05SIlOJORI2010 1 S : 3 ~ 91681803 IjRI,.VUlTl '0170 P"GG9/0tSI, ,,,

1 "ry' and hide! it from th e Cou:rt dur'ing a 1275 hear ing;2 ii i that corr .c t?,

A. Co::rrect.Q. Ok.y. I sn ' t i t t rue tha t on July 2 9 t h ~ I5 palievQ it i ~ ; o f t h i s y . 3 ~ ; t bel ieve t h a t WG S l a$ t6 ednesday; i. t h a t correct.? Ju ly 2 S ~ h . excuse me.7 es. i t"= t h ~ 28th.a L s , ' t ~ r u e tha t on July 2 8 ~ h which would, Wedn.adAy e v ~ n ~ yQU had a ~ ~ l ~ p h o n e10 o n v e r . a C i o D j w ~ t h K$. Liber t c o n c e r ~ n g the $8 r OOO t ha t, 11 e r mom was ~ v a n c i n 9 ?

12 A. W i ~ h her h u a b a n d ~ 13 Q. With her husband?I14 A. Yeq.l.S o. Dickn'f1;. you also have a conversat ion withI16 s . Liber i?

A. S h ~ t h r e e ~ w a y e d , 1 tb1nk. I had severa le n v a r a a t 1 0 ~ with a ~ e n t and I thLnk theze was one hraa way wj;h har on the phone, but we got cut o f f ~ ~ e r e was a ~ h o r t conversat ion.

21 o. Iri't it true that wr in g tbs course of theIi2Z onversation!with Ms. Liberi you entered into an .,24 rom th e $ S . ~ O O ? 25 A. I ' . ~ d t h a t t ~ e money cannot b e any monies

26 ~ X ' : i v e d f-t"Qmlill gatt'en gains. 27 'MRI SECORD, I f I may, your lIonor, th i s i s28 ~ e t h i n 9 t h ~ t bas recently come ,neo my possession. I t



36/58

lC121/2010 i3 49 S4S7B87S0S ORlvr':'!Tl #0829 P _038/05810/0S/2010 15:3Q 84 t861e03 {)Rllfi"nz .011$ ".OlO/918

,

!,1 s _ tape re10rding of a ja i l cal l between the bai liJ ndsman a n d l ~ $ . Liberi and her husband that I wouldI

) ik e to p l a Y ~ f o r Mr. Mebr re f reshe h is reco l leQt ionI . oncerning t ~ ~ phone c a l l tha t he had .i5 MRi, PAAL:. Your Honor. I'll Q b j . ~ t ~ I f,G o ~ n s e l has ~ h a t r t h i ~ i$ t r i a l by ambush. That w a ~ aI7 ong t ime a 9 ~ . I f he haa t ape l i ke tha t , the re are,6 lea of p r o p . ~ responsibi l i ty tha t you give toI9 pposing ccurtsel, buc sdt.t1ng here j u s t pul l ing a t a J ? " e ~, .,10 h a t ' . not ~ n e today, that type of practice. Jus t11 tape rirom y g ~ ~ pocket and say here ' s a tcpe.I12 ets ~ o t n;w lawyers p r a e t i c e ~ 13 TH, COURT: Mr. S e c o r d ~ f i r s t of a l l l I14 lnderstand t ~ . t i f this is played. there 's no way my,,15 . .n repor t* c..n take th is down.I16 K1U SllClUl: vmierstooo z your H o n o r ~ I,17 'I'll"! COl,JRT, A ll r i g h t . And if you want it to,

~ ~ t th e record, you're goiuS to hav. tol ' iQduce A ~ e ~ i t i e d t ranscr ip t of that recording.i20 Do !you unde&5tand tha t?!21 I!!R j SBCORD: Yes, I do, y o ~ K o n o r ~

22 'l'II>I (;OIlRT, With t h . t u n d e r B t a n d i n g ~ t wantt.o. r e s p o ~ to ' h is o b j e o t i o : n ~I24 MR41 SECORD; Your Honor, t h i s i s,25 ro - e x a . ' ~ t i o n . Thi$ ia also a chance for me to,. ..,h th e witnese. ! do-ni t have to give h i. .ac::unattt rtiat-erial


37/58

08

10/21/2010 13.50 B4B7BB?BOS ORLV;,HTZ ;1'0229 P. 0371


38/58

99

10/21/201C 13 50 SA97eS7eOS O ~ l V T A n z #OB23 P C3B/058

12

4S

9

1011121114

l8192021222324

27 28

..VlfV f ' . " ' ' : : IVI 'J

MIt; SECORD: Yes, your Honor.THt COURT! NQt fo r reQQllect ion o r

efreah ing h ~ . memory?JllRt SECORD; Yes, your Honor.

COli'R'P1 All ' f ' i gh t . I'll a l low it.I,MRi SHeORD, Thank you, your H o n o r ~ i(wleraupon th . audio tape vas pl .yQd and notn l ~ r t . e d )

Q. RY!MR. SECORD! Now s i r , I ask you again. didou have a e ~ u v e r s a t i o n the ~ v e n ( n g of ~ J l y 28th with,Q. Licar i w ~ Q ~ a YQU agreed wihh M ~ . Liber i tha t you,Id r e b a t e l $ B ~ O O O back to h .r m o m ~ a creQjt card bs ing M i c h e 1 ~ e St r i ck land ' s t r u . t accOunt?

A. N o ~ 110, not a t a l l .,Mltl FAAI., Your Hono't", I Qbjee t . That IS IlOt

~ h l l t ..,," ! , nJ COURT, He said no.I MRl FAAL, Thatllt you. , Q. BYI MR .. SBCOltD: Do you is it your!t h a t th is i e not you in t h i s tape?,A. That i s me, b u ~ I th ink y o u ~ r e taking iL out, f c : o n t e x t ~ ; , 1 Ohi ,

A. Yoil"re taking are you talking about th e - ,,O. I -I uet happeniA. you saying th.t,Q.' . - ~ I j u s t happen to have the ent i re t a p e ~ IQuld you l i ~ e me to play it so it i s in c o n t . ~ t ~ s i r?,

http:///reader/full/nl~rt.edhttp:///reader/full/nl~rt.ed


39/58


40/58

10/2i/Z01C 13.50 9491SS7B03 ORL HAUZ #CS29 P C40/C5S10)0$/2010 15:31 9 4 1 1 S G 1 8 & ~ OglY!AfTl f0110 1'_&14/(\18

1 ide the SQurce of the $S.OOO? 2 A. N O ~ and I will add when she t . lked about t h i ~ 3 rust fund, i had asked her where the monieG were" rrtvi,ng- frOin. and I never got - - 1 didn ' t kllo"" it. was5 ue to t h i s loan in t h . ~ . ~ $ t . I t . i ed to q u e ~ t i o n 5 hat . Than I _aid itls e.s1er thaq takiAg t h ~ t rus t7 o r the $8.000 - - and I sa id it would be eaa ie r to USea t on a c r e d i ~ card with the mom or h o w e v ~ r . , Me, decided to do it that: way and the re was no

10 efund o f t b A ~ $ 8 ~ O O O back to tho t r u ~ t . They were11 o1ng to t . a : k ~ -. - it WiiLS going to be done through the.12 ru$ t t ~ h e $ ~ , O O O o ~ i g i n a l 1 y ~ but i t was eas ie r to cake13 he $8.000 to r the $100.000 bond and then take the14 i fference of the t ruet to make up the difference15 ha t time.16 So;wben o.iqinally I wa. called on it. it w ~ s 17 100AOOO 1 2 7 ~ &0 it was easier to do i t with a c r ~ d i t 18 t han t ha t l so it Wile. j u s t making the money from19 he tru3t f ~ d or doing it through the credit eard and20 t turnea out to be a combination of both because 1 was21 ~ ; i . D g to al lOw _ ... when I met wi th H r Sacor4 and22 I"q,lained everything to hi.., he didn' t " , " off i"..33 , o i n , to.al low paymentB fo r up to y e a r ~ Be did24 Lt want us to do tha t . So we end9d up having to go2i 8.000 on th . credi t card, and tben the t ~ s t . ~ n d t h ~

reaehed o u t ~ o her father, bioiog1eal father for th ., i, '. j :her $6 ,000 .,,i o. Okay. Now, wh.n you agreed w.th Ms. Liber.



41/58

1 0 / 2 ~ / 2 3 1 0 "3.50 8491687;03 :JRlVH:TZ 10828 'J 011/05910JOS/201Q 15"31 at 1 6 S 1 G ~ 3 U'HlYfAlTl 11)710 P.t"5/t113

1a3t56789

10111313141.516111819202122:1.124

-. 2 '2728

!nd h4;!r lOOt-het thtolt you would .oe pa1d with a c r ed i t ~ r d tor $ S ~ ~ O O I you d id diso loae tba t to Mr. S e c o r d ~ 1


42/58

10/21/2010 13 50 $437637603 ORLViAITZ .0823 P 042/05810/0$11010 1531 S4 T B 8 1 i ~ 9 ORlvrAIn .0170 p.o1S/01$

1 MR. SECORD; Move to s t r ike eve4Ything2 a f t e r yes. 3 THE COURT, Grant.d. 4 Q. MR. SECORD 1 SQ a t enie p o i n t ~ i f I 5 unde'l"lu".l'lnd C'o.1:TfH":t:1Yt tnere: a t l e ~ s t two-4'. now

d i f f e ~ & n t ~ l a n a t i o n . to r w h ~ x e th i s r n o n ~ y oue of .7 M g ~ S t r i c k l ~ d ' s account i9 Comifig; i s Chat CQrrect?

FAAL: Your Honor,' that t_s argUMent9tive.

16 T.SE COURT: I t i s s o m e w h ~ t but 1"11 al19w i t .11 ah....d . 12 THE WITNBSS; I never got a lear anSwer 13 ~ r o m her h u ~ a n d Brent where the money was c ~ i n g from. 14 I did nQt kdo. where the mQnies came from. I thought 1.5 p.t was par t like! sa id ... par t of a family pool t h a tl ' pbtained the, c iv i l at torney fo r her c i v i l m a t t ~ ~ . 17 MR. SSCORD: Nothing fur ther .18i t : FURTHER RIIDlRller IDIAHI;HATIOII20 FAAL;:21 D ~ ~ t i ~ d ou t w h e t h e ~ 'Qr not Ms. L i b e r i ' ~ 22 r o t b ~ r waH ~ s o a c l i e n t o f M ~ . Str ickland?23 N ~ . 24 Q. OtJ;, you didn t t . Okay.25 MI(. FAAL, Thank you. Nothing f u r the r .26 COURT. Thank ,you.27, Ml4 SEeOl!!)' Nothing further. .28 MR;. l'AAL: Your Bonor< [ would like a t this



43/58

;0/21/2010 13:50 9497687803 Cill 'frAITZ J01:l2(l P 043/05Bi O / O / ~ Q 1 9 lS'Sl S4

12345, .7$91011l2131415161118192021

r 6 S 1 G ~ 3 ORlVTAITZ I V l n l r . V I I IV l t s

1Q4oint in t 1 ~ Mr. Secor4 to maybe assure me on thecord t ha t telephone conversations with M s ~ Liberi

. r e not a180 recorded.MR. SECORD: Your Honor, what I can assure io

11 c a l l s __ i as I understand i t , .11 c a l l s in and outf ~ h e j a i l ~ r e r eeorded . What I ~ a n assure counselb . ~ ~ h o s e ~ 1 1 * which has h is number and ehose ca l l sh ~ r e hQ he WAS t b r e . ~ w a y e d iu te ~ h e C Q n ~ r 8 A ~ i o n havet, by mysetf or to my knowlgdge by any other p e r s o ~

n th e D.A_s o f f i ce t been l i . t e n ~ to_ That w . ~ arepos i t ion ~ n d i n 9 the r s . lIm sor ry . HAve not beene have not l i s tened to them.

MR'. I'AAL, Thank yo".THE COURT: All r igh t . Anything fu r ther?M R ~ SECORO: Yes, your Honor. I would ca l l

n ~ s t i 9 8 t o r : T h Q ~ s Rice.Your Honor* th is ia th$ ~ $ c o r d i n g tha t was

us t played ~ n d we could lodge it wich the Court ath is time or; would the Court prefer t ha t I make der t i f ied t ranacr ip t of i t and lOdge it with the Courtater?

22 TIm COURT, Mr. Faal.lI MIL VAAU, Your Honor r since i t ' s being used24 " these p : r ; Q C e - e d i . n g s ~ I be:lleve that:. I 'm e t t t i t . l ad to25 th th e t a p ~ a.nd the transcript .:26 MR; SECORDt I w i l l m a k ~ copy Of both the27 ape and the: t ranser lpt and forward a eopy to counsel29 ~ n 4 lQ4ge both ~ i t h thQ CQurt with in a week.



44/58

lO/21/2C10 l J : 5 ~ 949 7 687903 OR:... 'ITA::: Tl #0829 P. 044/058lO/08!2{l10 15:31 8 . ~ r e n & ( l 3 O:RLVTAITl ,ono f'.QHII018,

1

3 4 5

7 8 t

10 11 12 I .14 15 16 17 18 19

r . 20 21

23 24

27 2S

...-!-----

IIir6\; and- i - C ' - e ~

O.A.

,

...+,J--- - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - ,105 COURT: And make Bure you send . . copy to

o u n e e l ~

Yes.COURT: OkaYT Thank YO,l.

TliOMAS RICE,i . a ~ l e d as ,1, tneas,nd t e s t i f i e ? as follow$;: THt C ~ E R K ; Do you solemnly s t a t . ~ h a t the ,,iden.ce YQUlare about: to give in t h i s m a t t e ~ ' now,

ding befote t h i s COUIt sha l l be th e t r u th . th e wholeru th , and n ~ t h 1 n 9 hut the t r u t h ~ so help you God?,WlTNESS, 1 do.tu, CLERK; Thank you. Please have a sea t .

P l ~ a s e s t ~ t e your ful l name and spell your !laTt name. for the reoord.TH* WITNESS: 'thomas Rice* T ~ h - o ~ m ~ a " ' l i J t ,THII COURT.


45/58

ORL VTAITZ 11'0829 p 04:5/059

Gr i yT .EA"""""Y I'n>.1'0._0:191139--T e l l ~ ) E ~ M a l I ' 4 r _ USA LIBE

v.

&A"""""Y_ . . . F"""","" , . Parlovoy, Saito 100

C A ~ U ! l 8 11;) 'u (949) 166-768i1ytd>oo.eom

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT OOlJRT FOR THE EASTERN mSTRICT OF PENNSYLVANlA

,,et oL,

.1'-

) C"""II89-1S9S HOD Eduard&Robnoo prt:Siding) Rl>pIy to lo.o7.HImotion by the Plaiulifllo) _ant'. ",1leIIt1\)' lIle ....r t to _!U' luh_ pow .. .t o _ l I l e ~ ) Alto....")' PIIiIip J.Berg _ WI. . . . . . Sh;,tey Waddell for) ads offraed .... the_ri perjll'Y)) lIeqllelltwe:tpedIte produetloo ofLisa Libori'.I P-.ylvaaia drivexpediteprodllCUo ofLiberi'. PAdriv.er's!lee...."This casei filed by plaintiffs on May 04., 2009. The case is fur defamatioo ofcharacter. re essenre of the case is the sworn statement hy the Plaintiff LisaLiberi and co-plaintiff and attorney Philip J Berg, claiming that Lib


46/58

10/21/2010 13'51 8497867603 3 R L V ~ A I T Z

innocent w residing in PA and physically working as a pamlegal for attomeyPhilip I. and she WllS defumed, when Taitt published on ber web site atranscript otlcriminal record ofLiberi, assistant ofBerg, showing her beingconvicted 0 multiple counts of:tbrgery ofdocuments and grand theft. Liberi andBerg ~ : ! I W J ' rn that Lisa Liberl is a different person, not one QQnvicted in CA. On

I06.04.1O!hi court assumed juri.sdiction based on eri,and for thaJ reason her PA drivers license needs 10 be kept sealed and this court issupposedJISSI.IIlW jurisdiction in diversity without any evidence ofLiberi'. stateresidency.

Li et aI v Taitt, et aI. Do!i:udontS response to n>tion. IJei\mdants det!lJlll


47/58

10/21/2010 13 5\ 9497067303 OR i...VTAFZ,,

Taitz is sub 'tting to this court an Exhibit l-Liberi's mug shot and an e-mail fromSan Bernard no County, Ca assistant District Attorney James, Secotd, attesting thatthis is a m shot ofLisa Liberi, convicted in CA.Exhibit 2 davit ofEd Hale, and Exhibit 3 Affidavit ofCanln Hale attesting to

e same mug shot is a mug .mot ofLisa Liberi, who appeared duringAugust 7,2,10 hearing in Liberi et v Taitz et aJ in PA, where severnl observers

Iwere where she claimed that .me was an innocent woman residing in PA,not L i ~ . ~ i who was convicted in CA, who was slandered and who is afraidfor bet life. 'iThe same davit slStes, !bat during the bearing I lD drivers license. nor any other

given by Liberi or any other Plaintiff or Attorney Berg to judgeRobreno. IExhibit 4Ajudavit ofOrIy Taitz, declaring under penalty of pe1jury, that she didhire any bit men, she did not attempt to hire any hit men to kill Lisa Liberi, she didnot commit any o!bllt crimes. she is being accused of.,Exhibit 5 SWorn andnotarized affidavit ofLinda Belcher. assistant for Philip Berg,declaring t .me did not commit any crimes, she was accused of by Liberi andBerg. Dele er reiterated that she was on the phone and personally heard Libericoaching to accuse innocent people ofcrimes and telliug that she did itbefore.

Ubi:: . ct al v Taitz et al. Defendants response I( ) motion. Defendants demand for sanctionsagainst Plaintiffs, witness Sbirley Waddell and AIIomey Philip J. Berg 3



48/58

' 0 ! 2 ~ / 2 0 1 0 lS'51 9491697603 OQLVTAlTl It0828 P.043/05R

Uberi's er, Shirley Waddell has submitted to thi. oourt numerous affidavits,her daughter was innocent and slandered, when hr CA conviction

Taitz is p r o ~ d i n g this court with Exhibit #6, copy of tbe trnnscrlpt from CASuperior cob. case FSB-044914. This tranSCript shows, that Libert's mQther notonly knew, ~ e her daughter committed crimes and ~ 1 ! S incarcereted in CA, she

Iwas the one who paid the ree foc the bail1x>ruI in order to bail her daughter fromjail.While none , the defendants have any criminal records, Liberi is .. career criminal,,with at 1 42 criminal charges and at least 10 criminal convictions offurgery andtheft. Plaint f rs accusations are nothing but malicious slander, brought forw..ro tocover up fo the fact thet Attorney Philip J Berg is indeed employing a convicteddocument lrgery liS his paralegal, and according to his own admission, she wasthe one, w drafted multiple pleadings.. including pleadings inBerg v 01:>ama.They areJo committing fraud on the court and peljury to CQver up fur the filet.,that attorne' Berg is aiding and libeling a convicted felon 00 probation to violateterms ofh probation. Defendants are asking this court to use it's inherent powersto sanction,, laintiffs, witness Shirley Waddell and attorney Philip J. Berg$200,000 e mated in time and expenses in defending this case brought forimproper p'prpcose to defraud the court.Ll1' et aI v1aitz et aI. Defendants respome to motion. DofendanlS demand fur ,",,"'Ii.,..""ins! Plaintiffs, "itness Shirley Waddell andAttom


49/58

10/21/2010 '3.51 94r

'hieb jurisdiction is based on diversity of citi:reoship, plaintiff hasburden to . W, first, that applicable statute coofer.; jurisdiction, and, second, thatassertion of urisdictiOil is consonant with constitutional limitations ofdueprocess. Iv. ght vKawasakiMQtQrs Corp. (1985, ED Va) 604 F Supp 968.

P a r t y ' ~ m allegationof diver.;ity carmot satisfy its burden ofestablishing districtcourt's j . .ction; citizenship ofeacb real party in interest must be


50/58

~ 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 0 1 3 , 5 ~ 9497SS7BC3, OR:..VTAI'!'Z IIJB29 P (lSO/05B,

citizens of S ; also patient only sought $ 10,000 in cost and W1SpC'Cified "",nOtfor other dalnages, which did not meet !UlIOWlt in controversy. Otsw v Qualit)(

c o n ~ ~ n c . (2004.IXNM) 380 F SI!DR2ri 1225.,cmplaint ainst John Doe defendant alleging Internet defamation was dismissed

liject matter jurisdiction because there was risk that if John Doe'sdiscovered there could have ,been no diversity, and court's

for lack of

jurisdictiQ 1 aufuority would have d i court declined to read amendedlanguage of28 uses 1441in/(} 28.M$lLill:l1 because it would have accomplished much broader result of

with only one party and only state law claims to proceed initially infederal . McMann" Doe (2OW.IX MlM$)46() E.Supp 2d

In motorist' personal inju:ry lawsuit agajnst, inter alia, owners ofproperty adjacentto private rtilroad-trnclc crossing where cat-train accidcul occurred, ptlI'SUlU1t to 28uses I 4.lidl.. appellate comt lacked jurisdiction to review remand thatimplicitly based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction; district coun clearlywas addreS$ingjutlsdictional issues--diversity of citizenship, 28"USJ,.'S 1332, andIfraudnient inder-and when doing

et o j" Taitt '" aI. Defendantsresporu;c tllmoUon. DefimdJmts demand for sanc1ionsagain.... PlaintiJlS, witness Shirley Wad


51/58

10/21/2010 52 S 4 ~

so, it Iy declined to decide doubtful question of _ law and, instead,iguity (lack of _ l aw directly on point) in motorist's fiivor. Filla v

R 3 CAS Yo) 336 F3d 806.

creams doubt as w jurisdiction, trial court must determine whetherthere are equate grounds to sustain its jurisdictioo over subject matter.

n tries nco v Ii rata 1964, Cd;! NJ) 3.38 F2d 449. 9 FR Serv 2d

to look to its own jurisdiction and lack of subject matter jurisdictionmay be _okt,ld by court, sua spoote, at any time. Jeter J(.T11'II Walter Homes. Inc.

klaL 414FSum 79US,9. decided by a preponder;an"" ofeviden"".

Court has

Plaintiffs

case at

,d not pIl'Se!1t any evidence, not a shred of evidence, showing Liberi toof PA. Defendants have shown that according to her probation shey in CA or NM, she is subject to the jurisdiotion of CA, therefure thehas to be dismissed as Citizenship of Liberi was not provided to

resolve the issue of diversity to allow it to proceed in Federal court. Defendantshave I t ' to gel a copy of such PA license, as it is maJ:erial in this case. JfindeedLiberi did not produce a PA drivers license or produced a forged PA drivers

Li et al v Tait:l et.1. Derendants response to ooooon. Defendants demand fur sanctionsagaiost Plaiotilfs, witness Shirley Waddell and Attorney Philip J Berg 1



52/58

10/21/2010 13:52 948'881603 Ofll vr;or fZ ItOS29 p.C52{05S

this court made an error of filet, it had no jurisdiction and the case hasdue to lack ofjurisdiction. Decision lllfl& based on fraud is a validB reconsidemtion. All of Libert's allegations, that her license is

supposed to be soa1ed due to the filet that she is being threatened are not based onany fuets, not base on any evidence, plaintiffprovided nothing except slander,defumation f c:b.aracter and insane tall tales. Liberi claims, that Taitz boxed her in.In reality . did not box her in, Liberi's own lies caught up with her. If she

ovide her license, the case needs to be dismissed as the court has nosi t in div...-sity without proof of citizenship. If she produces a valid

license, it ill show her residing in CA or NM and will show that she is indeed theisame Lisa /..iberi, who committed 10 counts of forgety and fraud in CA and

refuses to

,allowed to reside only in ea or NM under the supervision of the probationdepartment It will show the court that the whole case fur slander and defumation,that she by claiming to be resident ofP A and an innocent vietbn of slander, isfrivolous d represents fraud on the court, which would be grounds for thedi.missal 0 the case and sanctions _inst the plaintiffS and their attorney Berg furthe egregi fraud on the


53/58

'0/21/2010 13 52 9 . 9 ~ 6 3 1 G 0 3 GRl 'HAITi #0829 P,l)53/C5B

web i Jooff Staples and IeI.tenI and affidavits from volunl_ political,

researcher rlitlda Belcher, who knew Berg for over 10 years, show that Liberi wasengaged in .olation of the terms of her probationby handling credit card numbersof others, t Attorney Berg knew about it and filed this legal actioo with the goalofharassin the whistle blowers and by fraudulently stating thatUberi is a residentof PA and not the same Liberi, who was convicted in CA and currently onprobation. n defendants demanded proof of this alleg.ation, Berg and Libericommitted . fraud on the oourt by claiming that Liberi's PA drivers license issupposed be sealed, because she is in fear of her life and by falsely accusingdefendants of crimes or intent to commit crimes. Without any shred of evidcnee.

ithey falsel i accused of multiple crimes a number of individuals; Desert Stormveteran, m er and wife Pamela Barnett , Licensed investigator Sankey, veteranand retired . eer Neil Turner, retired engineer NOOIllIll Murray and Taitz, who

attomey and licensed doctor of Dental Surgery. Neill"'r one of thesecommitted any crimes. It is beyond egregiousfraud on the court, it

is II depravk heart criminal behavior , for a licensc4 attorney Berg to make suchoutrageoushire withocriminalviolate

Libo .

,accusations of anempts to bite a hit man, kidnap children, wurder fur

any shred of evidence, with the only goal to cover up his pri ....vior of aiding and abetting a felon on probation, Lisa Liberi, toof her probation. This type of behavior is beyond sanctionable, it is II

et al v Taitz et aI. Deleodants response to motion. Defendant$


54/58

10/21/201C 12:52 84978703 oiU 'iT IIITZ ~ o e 2 8 P 054/058

type ofbeh .or, that isgrounds fur disbarment and criminal prosecutiml.

Is move this court to grant their motion and provide to !bed include in !be record on appeal to be forwarded to the Third

Circuit Co ofAppeals (case 1110-3000) PlaintiffLJsa LJberl'sPA driversch was sllegedly submitted to this court by LJberi's attorney Philipthe 08.07.09 motion hearing. but was not included in the transcript,

and whicht t h ~ basis ofthis court's decision to deny the Defendant's motion todismiss this. case due to lack ofjwisdiction and to include in !be 06.04.10 order a,finding "Liberl is a resident of PA"

'WI l l licen.'ie for Liberi is available, Defendants are moving thls courtto dismiss qurrent action 09-1898 Liberi et ..1 v Taitz et sl due to lack ofjurisdiction due to !be fact that Liberi never provided proof ofher PA residence,and withe proofof state resideoc" no federal district court can assert diversityjurisdiction3. Defen Is request sanctions and damages in the amount of $200,000 awardedto them du to egregious fraud on the court by the Plaintiffs and their attorneyPhilip J. Jg ,

I,

Libe etalv Tailz ctal. Defendants response to motion. DeJi:ndantg demand fur sonctionsagainst Plaintiffs.witness Shirley Waddell and Att\'J!'lley Philip J. Berg 10

http:///reader/full/08.07.09http:///reader/full/06.04.10http:///reader/full/08.07.09http:///reader/full/06.04.10


55/58

10/21/2010 13.52 949r

lsi Dr. Or! Talrz, E S Q ~ _ _ _ _ _07.28.10.

er penalty of peIjury, that 1 served above ple


56/58

10/21/201C 13.52 8491887602 DflL \'T AITZ #0928 P,058/058

AudreyB.ChiefJudgeUS District t::otnt411 W. F strSanta Ana CA 92701iJudgeDav; ,O. Carter

USDC District ofCA411 west F urth StrSantaAna A 92701Public 't y Sectionl)epanInentofJustice950 Pe vaniaAve, NWWashingtnn DC 20530-0001

!

, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)" ~ ~ ~ r t e u r OIl the Situation ofHuman Rights Defenders01 Ie Mrs. Margaret Sekaggyaatioos

eva 10, SwitzerlandCriminal bar Hagueal vTaittet aI. De1imda:n1S response to motion. De1imdaa1s 00:aWld for sanctionsagainst Plaintif!ls.witness Shirley Waddell and Attorney Philip J. Berg 12



57/58

10/21/2010 13_52 949;

latjoJllS Commission for Defenders (Ms) Human Ri 1;$ OfficerCivil and p Utica! Rights SectionSpecial DivisionOffice of High Commissioner fur Human Rightstel:+4129179151email:otolIslOrlyTa07.28.10.

Lawoffi ofDr. Orly T .tz, ESQ29839San.Margarita CA 92688Pro se and or Defend Our Freedoms Foundation

UNITED STATES DISTRICTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVAN!A

Lisa Li . et al ) Case # 09-cv"()1898-ECRPlaintiffs ) Assigned to Honotllble Eduardo C.

Robreno)

V ) al )

Li . . aI v Taitz et 01. DefOlldm!t9 ""'JlO1l5" to motion. Defendants demand fot $OllOIionsagainst plaintiffil. witness Sbidey Wadden and Attorney Philip I. Beti I ,

http:///reader/full/07.28.10http:///reader/full/07.28.10


58/58

1 0 / 2 1 / 2 0 ~ O 19-59 9491GBIG03 IOS23 p, 0 5 e / ~ 5

DefendantsORDER

iAND NO",", this day of October 2010 after consideration ofiDefendanlmotion-request for docwnents missing from August 7, 2009 transcript

and 60 B " On for Reconsideration of this coutts June 4 and July 13, 2010 otdet.iDefendant' 'Motion is granted. Plaintiffs 10,07.10 motion is denied.

Plaimiflil, 'tness Shirley Waddell and attorney fur pla.intiflS Philip J Berg isotdeted to w cause, why they should no! be sanctioned for repeated acts ofperjury, fi:a on this court as well as on the Third Circuit Court ofAppeals and forfiling a . , OIlS legal action not based on fact and law.IT IS SO obERED

i,

Eduardo C. bmw. J

http:///reader/full/10,07.10http:///reader/full/10,07.10

Documents

LIBERI v TAITZ (E.D. PA) - 147 - EXHIBITS by deft ORLY TAITZ - pdf.147.0