Upload
jack-ryan
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
1/37
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA LIBERI, et al, Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORLY TAITZ, et al,Defendants.
::::::::::
Assigned to Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR
ORDER
AND NOW, this _____ day of June, 2009, it is hereby
ORDERED and DECREED that:
(1) A Restraining Order is issued. Defendants Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz
a/k/a Law Offices of Orly Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation;
Neil Sankey; The Sankey Firm, Sankey Investigations, Inc., Linda Sue Belcher a/k/a
Linda S. Belcher a/k/a Linda Starr a/k/a Newwomensparty a/k/a Stitchenwitch a/k/a Eva
Braun a/k/a Web Sergeant a/k/a Katy a/k/a www.obamacitizenshipdebate.org ; Edgar (Ed)
Hale a/k/a JD Smith; Caren Hale; Bar H Farms; Plains Radio Network, Inc. a/k/a Plains
Radio; and KPRN AM 1610 and all parties acting on their behalf are enjoined from airing
and/or publishing any defamatory or false statements about Plaintiffs, Lisa Liberi, Philip
J. Berg, the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Evelyn Adams, Lisa Ostella, the Plaintiffs
family members, etc. via the internet or any other print or electronic medium or
broadcasts and/or radio, from portraying Plaintiffs in a false-light via the internet or
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 1 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
2/37
2
another print or electronic medium or broadcasts and/or radio, untrue statements about
the Plaintiffs;
(2) Defendants Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly
Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation; Neil Sankey; The Sankey
Firm, Sankey Investigations, Inc., and all parties acting on their behalf are enjoined from
disseminating, publishing, e-mailing, posting and distributing Liberis Social Security
number, date of birth, mothers maiden name, residency, place of birth and all other
personal identifying information;
(3) Defendants Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of OrlyTaitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation; Neil Sankey; The Sankey
Firm, Sankey Investigations, Inc., Linda Sue Belcher a/k/a Linda S. Belcher a/k/a Linda
Starr a/k/a Newwomensparty a/k/a Stitchenwitch a/k/a Eva Braun a/k/a Web Sergeant
a/k/a Katy a/k/a www.obamacitizenshipdebate.org ; Edgar (Ed) Hale a/k/a JD Smith;
Caren Hale; Bar H Farms; Plains Radio Network, Inc. a/k/a Plains Radio; and KPRN AM
1610 are enjoined from any further harassment; invasion of privacy; violation of rights to
privacy; cyber stalking; cyber harassment; cyber invasion of privacy; of the Plaintiffs;
(4) Defendants Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly
Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., are enjoined from the
filing and reporting of falsified criminal activity, etc;
(5) Defendants Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly
Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc., Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., Neil Sankey, the
Sankey Firm and Sankey Investigations and any party who has published Lisa Liberis
confidential information and false accusations of criminal activities posted, published,
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 2 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
3/37
3
disseminated about Lisa Liberi on their behalves to immediately retract and remove Lisa
Liberis private confidential information, including but not limited to her Social Security
number, date of birth, where she resides, mothers maiden name; fathers name; place of
birth; information about her husband, the false criminal accusations;
(6) Defendants Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly
Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc., Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., and anyone on their
behalf are enjoined from disseminating, publishing, e-mailing, posting and distributing
Lisa Ostellas personal and confidential information, including but not limited to her
home address, telephone number and maiden name;(7) Defendants Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly
Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc, Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., and any party who has
published Lisa Ostellas confidential information and false accusations of criminal
activities posted, published, disseminated about Lisa Ostella on their behalves to
immediately retract and remove Lisa Ostellas private confidential information, including
but not limited to her home address, telephone number and maiden name and the false
criminal accusations;
(8) Defendants Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly
Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation; Neil Sankey; The Sankey
Firm, Sankey Investigations, Inc., James Sundquist; Rock Salt Publishing; Linda Sue
Belcher a/k/a Linda S. Belcher a/k/a Linda Starr a/k/a Newwomensparty a/k/a
Stitchenwitch a/k/a Eva Braun a/k/a Web Sergeant a/k/a Katy a/k/a
www.obamacitizenshipdebate.org ; Edgar (Ed) Hale a/k/a JD Smith; Caren Hale; Bar H
Farms; Plains Radio Network, Inc. a/k/a Plains Radio; and KPRN AM 1610 are
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 3 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
4/37
4
ORDERED to retract all slander and libel disseminated, posted, published and e-mailed
about Plaintiffs Lisa Liberi, Philip J. Berg, the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Evelyn
Adams, Lisa M. Ostella and Go Excel Global;
(9) Defendants Orly Taitz, Esquire a/k/a Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a
Law Offices of Orly Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation are
ORDERED to issue a cashiers check in the amount of Twenty Thousand [$20,000.00]
Dollars payable to Lisa Liberi through this Court within seventy-two [72] hours;
(10) Defendants Orly Taitz, Esquire a/k/a Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a
Law Offices of Orly Taitz a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation areORDERED to pay Plaintiffs Counsel, Philip J. Berg, Esquire Attorney fees in the
amount of Five Thousand [$5,000.00] Dollars; and
(11) The Social Security Administration is ORDERED to immediately issue a
new Social Security number to Plaintiff Lisa Liberi in order to ensure her safety.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Date: June _____, 2009 ______________________________ U.S. District JudgeEduardo C. Robreno, J.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 4 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
5/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 1
Law Offices of:PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Attorney for: PlaintiffsIdentification No. 09867(610) 825-3134
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA LIBERI, et al,Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORLY TAITZ, et al,Defendants.
::::::::::
Assigned to Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR
PLAINTIFFS EMERGENCY MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PLAINTIFFSINJUNCTION or RESTRAINING ORDER REQUESTED IN PLAINTIFFSMOTION FILED and DOCKETED as DOCUMENT NO. 3 ON MAY 4, 2009
NOW COMES the Plaintiffs, Lisa Liberi [hereinafter Liberi], Philip J. Berg,
Esquire [hereinafter Berg], the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Evelyn Adams a/k/a
Momma E [hereinafter Adams], Lisa Ostella [hereinafter Ostella] and Go Excel
Global by and through their undersigned counsel and respectfully requests this Honorable
Court to grant their Emergency Injunction or a Restraining Order against Defendants,
Orly Taitz, Esquire a/k/a Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly Taitz
a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc [hereinafter Taitz]; Defend our Freedoms Foundation; Neil
Sankey [hereinafter Sankey]; The Sankey Firm, Sankey Investigations, Inc; Linda Sue
Belcher a/k/a Linda S. Belcher a/k/a Linda Starr a/k/a Newwomensparty a/k/a
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 5 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
6/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 2
Stitchenwitch a/k/a Eva Braun a/k/a Web Sergeant a/k/a Katy a./k/a
www.obamacitizenshipdebate.org [hereinafter Belcher]; Edgar (Ed) Hale a/k/a JD
Smith [hereinafter Mr. Hale]; Caren Hale [hereinafter Mrs. Hale]; Bar H Farms;
Plains Radio Network, Inc. a/k/a Plains Radio [hereinafter Plains Radio]; and KPRN
AM 1610, on the following grounds:
1. Plaintiffs filed for an Emergency Injunction or Restraining Order on May
4, 2009 appearing on the Docket as document number 3. To date, this Motion has
not been ruled upon and the Defendants behaviors have intensified. Inasmuch,
Plaintiffs have been suffering serious damages.2. Plaintiffs hereby incorporate by reference their original May 4, 2009
Motion for an Emergency Injunction [Doc. #3] and their Complaint filed May 4,
2009, [Doc. #1] as if fully set forth herein.
3. As set forth in detail below, Plaintiffs are in immediate need of an
Emergency Injunction or Restraining Order to prohibit further violations of the
following by the Defendants:
The disclosure, posting on the internet, sending through RSS
Feeds, e-mailing, etc. of Plaintiff, Lisa Liberis Social Security
number, date of birth, mothers maiden name, where she was born
and other confidential private information. in violation of State and
Federal Laws, e.g. the Social Security Act, California Privacy
Laws, Civil Code 1798 et sequitur; Identity Theft and
Assumption Deterrence Act, 18 U.S.C. 1028(a)(7); Pennsylvania
Privacy Acts (74 Pa. Stat. Ann. 201 (West 2006); California
Business and Professions Code 22577(a); the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-22, and the
Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. 2701-11.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 6 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
7/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 3
Cyber harassment, Cyber stalking, etc. in violation of the
Womens Violence Act, Department of Justice Reauthorization
Act of 2005, H.R. 3402, titled "Preventing Cyber stalking" and
numbered as 113, 113(a)(3) provides that Section 223(a)(1)(C)
applies to "any device or software that can be used to originate
telecommunications or other types of communications that are
transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet; Cyber-stalking and
Cyber-harassment laws in violation of the Communications Act,
47 U.S.C. 223(a)(1)(C) and 223(h)(1)(B).
Slander and Libel.
Harassment. Calling for individuals in the locations which Plaintiffs reside.
4. Plaintiffs Counsel appeared before Your Honor on May 4, 2009 when he
filed the above referenced action seeking an Immediate Temporary Injunction and/or
a Temporary Restraining Order to prevent the harm the Defendants in the within
action have and continue to cause.
5. Your Honor stated once all the Defendants have been personally served
with the Summons, Complaint, the Emergency Motion for the Temporary Injunction,
Memorandum of Law in Support of the Emergency Motion for a Temporary
Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order to contact your chambers and inform
you service was complete and Your Honor would set a phone conference for Counsel
over this issue. Plaintiffs Counsel wrote to Your Honor on May 12, 2009 requesting
a telephone conference.
6. On May 11, 2009, Plaintiffs Counsel contacted your Honors chambers as
he was instructed to do to inform Your Honor all Defendants had been served with
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 7 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
8/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 4
the exception of James Sundquist and Rock Salt Publishing. Counsel was instructed
to send a letter, which he did on May 12, 2009. Counsel never heard back from Your
Honors chambers.
7. On May 14, 2009, Plaintiffs Counsel sent a second [2 nd] letter to Your
Honors chambers Ex Parte as Defendant Taitz and Defend our Freedoms
Foundation, Inc.s behaviors were becoming more serious and Taitz had just released
the information on a Sealed case of Plaintiffs Counsel. On May 15, 2009,
Plaintiffs Counsel again called Your Honors chambers and was told Your Honor
was reviewing the letter and someone would be back in touch. To date, no one fromYour Honors Chambers has contacted my offices.
8. Plaintiffs Counsel has attempted to have this matter heard before
Plaintiffs suffered any further injury, unfortunately, Counsel has been unsuccessful.
9. All Defendants have been personally served. Despite being served, all the
Defendants, except James Sundquist and Rock Salt Publishing,have continued their
illegal and harmful behaviors. In fact, Defendant, Orly Taitz, an Attorney, somehow
obtained the information to a case of mine which was filed Under Seal and
published it on her website at www.orlytaitzesq.com . At that time I wrote to Your
Honor Ex Parte on May 14, 2009 requesting the entry of an Injunction or
Restraining Order.
10. Major additional problem that needs Emergency attention.
Yesterday, Monday, June 22, 2009, Defendant Orly Taitz, Esquire, et al has now
published where Lisa Liberi was born and her mothers maiden name . See
EXHIBIT 1. This coupled with the fact Ms. Taitz has published and still
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 8 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
9/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 5
continues to publish Lisa Liberis full Social Security number and date of birth places
Mrs. Liberi in serious risk of theft, identity theft, people can pull Mrs. Liberis credit
file, etc., which Mrs. Liberi has absolutely no protections from.
11. Mrs. Liberi will now suffer serious damages as a result of Mrs. Taitz
publication of Mrs. Liberis full Social Security number, date of birth, mothers
maiden name, where Mrs. Liberi was born, etc. To name a few, Mrs. Liberi is at
serious risk of:
a. Birth Certificates from Washington State are public record;Anyone now can obtain Liberi's birth certificate and completely
assume her identity. b. Anyone can now obtain Liberi's financial records; Social Security
records; credit file (which has Liberi's home address).
c. Anyone can obtain an Intellus report on Liberi now they have her Social Security number, date of birth, mother's maiden name, placeof birth and father's name and obtain all Liberi's financial records,assets, etc.
d. Anyone can apply for credit using Liberi's personal identifyinginformation. Mrs. Taitz has now given them every aspect requiredto obtain credit.
e. Mrs. Liberi must close all her current accounts and place freezeswhich means she will not have any open credit to use.
f. Mrs. Taitz has called for people where Liberi resides andhas called for the purging of Obama and his clique; she has calledfor Armed Rebellion against our Government; she has called for civilian militia that places Liberi, her kids and her husband insevere danger of bodily harm.
g. Mrs. Liberi must now move, which means her husband will haveto take off work, she will have to pay a large amount of money toget into a new residence, she will have to pay movers, plus pay to
break her current lease; Liberi will have to pay disconnect andreconnection fees and again with absolutely no available credit tohelp her.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 9 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
10/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 6
h. Mrs. Liberi must obtain a Court Order for the re-issuance of a newSocial Security number and the re-issuance of a new SocialSecurity number takes approximately 6-8 weeks and will not haveany availability to credit and will have to start all over building anew credit history.
i. Defendant, Orly Taitz should be immediately ordered to pay LisaLiberi Twenty Thousand [$20,000] Dollars within 72 hoursthrough this Court so Mrs. Liberi is able to take the above stepsnecessary to protect herself and family.
12. It is important to note, Mrs. Liberis Social Security number was
originally issued out of Texas, so no one was aware of where Mrs. Liberi was born,
her mothers maiden name, etc. It should also be noted, as a result of Orly Taitz,Esquire illegal actions, a woman in Texas is now using Mrs. Liberis Social Security
number, see EXHIBIT 2 .
13. Mrs. Liberis Social Security number was changed when she, her son and
her husband were issued a confidential address to protect them from further tracking
and domestic violence she and her son were victims of.
14. After service of the Complaint and other documents in this case,
Defendant Taitz continued sending our her Dossier #6, which has been previously
submitted to this Court, with Lisa Liberis personal identifying information, including
but not limited to name, date of birth and full Social Security number. Plaintiffs
hereby incorporate all Exhibits, Exhibits A through Q attached to their
Opposition [Doc. No. 63] to Defendant Orly Taitz, Esquire and Defend our Freedoms
Foundation, Inc. Second Amended Motion to Dismiss.
15. In addition, Plaintiff Lisa Ostella has lost every one of her clients as a
result of Mrs. Taitz illegal activities and falsified rumors. Plaintiffs have been
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 10 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
11/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 7
harassed, their privacy completely invaded, their personal information posted on the
Internet, sent in mass e-mailing (Orly Taitz Dossier #6 with Mrs. Liberis full Social
Security number and other personal identifying information was sent to in excess of
140,000 individuals and companies, including internationally); Plaintiffs have been
placed in a false light before the public, etc. This information has continued since the
Defendants were served with the Complaint and Motion for an Injunction.
16. Moreover, Mrs. Taitz is continuing her attempts to show some type of
connection between Mrs. Liberi and President Obama, including President Obamas
family, which is a total lie. This is important because Mrs. Taitz has called for thepurging of President Obama and his clique, see EXHIBIT 3 .
17. Mrs. Taitz through Defend our Freedoms Foundation as well the other
Defendants actions includes, just giving a few, but are not limited to:
Publication of Lisa Liberis full Social Security number, date of birth,where she was born, mothers maiden name, etc.
The Hale Defendants & Sankey publicly announced Lisa Liberi hadrecently taken out a loan; The Hale Defendants stated they were givendocuments with Lisa Liberis confidential and private information by
Neil Sankey, which Sankey collaborated on the Hale radio shows;
Mrs. Taitz through Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. and the SankeyDefendants conspired and illegally altered and forged e-mails of Plaintiff Lisa Ostella;
Mrs. Taitz through Defend our Freedoms has called for people in theareas that the Plaintiffs reside; have called for information regardingfinancials, Social Security numbers, where they live, previous addresses,voting records, associations, etc. of Lisa Liberi and her husband; andEvelyn Adams and her husband;
Mrs. Taitz through Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. have filedfalsified law enforcement reports against Lisa Liberi and Lisa Ostellaclaiming these two Plaintiffs are one and the same and that they diverted
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 11 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
12/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 8
funds from her PayPal Account; hacked her PayPal Account, stolenfrom her, the same allegations Mrs. Taitz made against President Obamaand his thugs; and Danny Bickell, U.S. Supreme Court Clerk;
Mrs. Taitz through Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. have inferred
Plaintiffs are President Obamas clique and they are Obots, Mrs.Taitz through Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. have called for the political purging of President Obama and his Clique. As this Court isaware, the definition of purge in the political sense is to Kill.
The Hales on their radio show, Plains Radio Network, Inc. have continuedtheir slander and libel of Plaintiff Evelyn Adams, calling her heinousnames, stating she is going to prison, falsely accusing Mrs. Adams of stealing their Obama divorce papers, falsely accusing Mrs. Liberi of removing the watermark from their divorce papers, falsely claimingPlaintiff Philip J. Berg is stealing peoples money, has no pending cases,
is a shyster, etc. Linda Sue Belcher, et al has continued her slander and libel of the
Plaintiffs by stating Plaintiff Berg and Mrs. Liberi lied on Affidavitswhich were filed in the Federal Courts; claimed something was going tohappen to Mrs. Liberi which will make Plaintiff Berg very unhappy;falsely inferred Plaintiff Berg is having affairs and stating she (Linda S.Belcher) was going to contact his significant other, Carol and tell her which will force Plaintiff Berg to call Mrs. Liberi a liar; threatening
bodily harm to Mr. Berg and Mrs. Liberi if they step foot in her (LindaBelchers) neck of the woods which is the Western District of Texaswhere Linda Belcher is attempting to have this case moved; falselyaccusing Mrs. Liberi and Mr. Berg of tapping her cell phone, etc.
18. All of the above has been filed with this Court in Plaintiffs Briefs in
Opposition to Mrs. Taitz and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. frivolous filings.
The events that took place prior to the filing of this lawsuit were included in
Plaintiffs Complaint and Motion for an Emergency Injunction or Restraining Order.
19. It should be noted by this Court, with the exception of Defendants Orly
Taitz, Esquire, et al and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc, none of the
other Defendants have opposed Plaintiffs Emergency Motion for an Injunction
or Temporary Restraining Order prohibiting these illegal behaviors. In fact, Ms.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 12 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
13/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 9
Taitz and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. did not have Standing to
file their Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for the Emergency Injunction as Default
had been entered and Judgment by Default packages had been filed with this Court
prior to their late filings.
20. James Sundquist and Rock Salt Publishing were originally named in this
suit for two (2) e-mails they sent out pertaining to Lisa Ostella. Defendants James
Sundquist and Rock Salt Publishing are the only Defendants who have refrained
from their illegal and tortuous behavior. In addition, Plaintiffs have a pending
Motion for Leave to Dismiss Defendants James Sundquist and Rock Salt Publishing.21. Now that all Defendants have been personally served pursuant to this
Courts Order, and with the exception of the Defaulted Defendants, have entered their
appearances, and the continuance illegal behaviors of the Defendants which are
causing continued harm to the Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs through their counsel are
requesting the issuance of the Emergency Injunction and/or Restraining Order.
22. In addition, Plaintiffs through their undersigned counsel respectfully
request Five Thousand Dollars [$5,000.00] payable to Philip J. Berg, Esquire to cover
the research and drafting of this brief, preparation and hearing on this matter.
WHEREFORE , Plaintiffs respectfully prays that this Honorable Court:
A. Grant Plaintiffs Motion for an Emergency Injunction and/or
Restraining Order prohibiting the Defendants from any further slander and/or
libel;
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 13 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
14/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 10
B. An immediate Order enjoining the Defendants Orly Taitz, Esquire
a/k/a Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly Taitz a/k/a Orly
Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation; Neil Sankey; The Sankey Firm,
Sankey Investigations, Inc; Linda Sue Belcher a/k/a Linda S. Belcher a/k/a Linda
Starr a/k/a Newwomensparty a/k/a Stitchenwitch a/k/a Eva Braun a/k/a Web
Sergeant a/k/a Katy a/k/a www.obamacitizenshipdebate.org ; Edgar (Ed) Hale
a/k/a JD Smith; Caren Hale; Bar H Farms; Plains Radio Network, Inc. a/k/a Plains
Radio; and KPRN AM 1610 and all parties acting on their behalf from airing
and/or publishing any defamatory or false statements about Plaintiffs, Lisa Liberi,Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Evelyn Adams, Lisa
Ostella, Go Excel Global, the Plaintiffs family members, etc. via the internet or
any other print or electronic medium or broadcasts and/or radio, from portraying
Plaintiffs in a false-light via the internet or another print or electronic medium or
broadcasts and/or radio, untrue statements about the Plaintiffs; enjoin the
Defendants from any further harassment of the Plaintiffs, enjoin Defendants
from the filing and reporting of falsified criminal activity, etc.
C. An immediate Order enjoining Defendants Taitz, Defend our
Freedoms Foundation, Inc., Neil Sankey, the Sankey Firm and Sankey
Investigations, Inc., and any party on their behalf from disseminating Liberis
Social Security number, date of birth, name, where she was born, mothers
maiden name, where she lives, etc.
D. An immediate Order of Retraction against Defendants Taitz,
Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., Neil Sankey, the Sankey Firm and Sankey
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 14 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
15/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 11
Investigations, Inc., and any party who has published Liberis confidential
information on their behalves to immediately retract and remove Liberis private
confidential information, including but not limited to her Social Security number,
date of birth, where she resides, her mothers maiden name, where she was born,
information about her husband, etc.
E. A Court Order directed at the Social Security Administration for
the Social Security Administration to issue Lisa Liberi a new Social Security
number;
F. An immediate Order that Defendant Orly Taitz, Esquire andDefend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. immediately pay Twenty Thousand
[$20,000.00] Dollars within in seventy-two [72] hours through this Court payable
to Plaintiff Lisa Liberi for the relocation of Mrs. Liberi and her family as a result
of the private confidential information Mrs. Taitz has posted, sent out via e-mail,
sent out through the Internet RSS feed, etc.
G. Grant Plaintiffs Attorney fees in the amount of Five Thousand
Dollars [$5,000.00] payable to Philip J. Berg, Esquire within Seventy-Two [72]
hours and such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
. Respectfully submitted,
s/ Philip J. BergDated: June 23, 2009 _____________________________ Philip J. Berg, EsquireAttorney for the Plaintiffs555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Identification No. 09867(610) 825-3134
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 15 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
16/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 12
Law Offices of:PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Attorney for: PlaintiffsIdentification No. 09867(610) 825-3134
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA LIBERI, et al,Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORLY TAITZ, et al,Defendants.
:::::
:::::
Assigned to Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR
PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR EMERGENCY MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PLAINTIFFS INJUNCTION
or RESTRAINING ORDER REQUESTED IN PLAINTIFFS MOTIONFILED and DOCKETED as DOCUMENT NO. 3 ON MAY 4, 2009
Plaintiffs hereby incorporate by reference their Complaint filed May 4, 2009
[Doc. #1] and their Motion for an Emergency Injunction and Memorandum of law in
support thereto filed on May 4, 2009 [Doc. #3] as if fully set forth herein.
I. PLAINTIFFS MEET THE BURDEN FOR THIS COURT TOISSUE THE EMERGENCY INJUNCTION OR RESTRAININGORDER:
The traditional standard for granting a Preliminary Injunction requires the
Plaintiff to show that in the absence of its issuance he will suffer irreparable injury and
also that he is likely to prevail on the merits. It is recognized, however, that a district
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 16 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
17/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 13
court must weigh carefully the interests on both sides, Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc ., 422 U.S.
922, 925 (U.S. 1975), Adams v. Freedom Forge Corp ., 204 F.3d 475, 482 (3d Cir. Pa.
2000), AT&T v. Winback & Conserve Program, Inc ., 42 F.3d 1421, 1427 (3d Cir. 1994);
Acierno v. New Castle Cty ., 40 F.3d 645, 653 (3d Cir. 1994); In re Arthur Treacher's
Franchisee Litig ., 689 F.2d 1137, 1143 (3d Cir. 1982). If relevant, the Court should also
examine the likelihood of irreparable harm to the nonmoving party and whether the
injunction serves the public interest. See AT&T v. Winback , 42 F.3d at 1427.
Plaintiffs are plainly entitled to an Emergency Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining
Order, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to halt the dangerousand illegal behaviors of the Defendants.
Specifically, this Court must grant Plaintiffs Motion for an Emergency Injunction
or Restraining Order because: (1) there is reasonable probability that Plaintiffs will
succeed on the merits; (2) the Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of
relief; (3) there will be little or no harm to the Defendants if relief is granted; and (4) the public interest demands a grant of relief. See, e.g. Swartzwelder v. McNeilly , 297 F.3d
228, 234 (3 rd Cir. 2002); Prison Health Servs., Inc. v. Umar , Civil Action No. 02-2642,
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12267 (E.D. Pa. May 8, 2002). The standards for a preliminary
injunction and a TRO are the same. Mertz v. Houstoun , 155 F. Supp.2d 415, 425 n.12
(E.D. Pa 2001); Bieros v. Nicola , 857 F. Supp. 445, 446-47 (E.D. Pa. 1994). While the
degree of probability of success on the merits required to obtain such relief varies among
Federal Courts of Appeals, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit requires only a
reasonable likelihood of success. See Johnson & Johnson Orthopedics, Inc. v.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 17 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
18/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 14
Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. , 715 F. Supp. 110, 112 n.1 (D. Del. 1989). Plaintiffs
easily meet each of the requirements for an Injunction or Restraining Order .
A. Plaintiffs have already suffered and will continue to sufferirreparable, un-repairable Harm without the issuance of theEmergency Injunction or Restraining Order:
The mere fact Taitz through Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., Sankey, the
Sankey Firm, Sankey Investigations, Inc. have been distributing Liberis Social Security
number, date of birth and now Liberis mothers maiden name, where Liberi was born,
etc. Liberi is at serious risk of individuals using her information, illegally obtaining
credit, assuming Liberis identity, therefore this conduct must be stopped. More
concerning is the fact Sankey through Sankey Investigations, Inc. and the Sankey firm
admittedly furnished Liberis information to Defendants Edgar Hale, Caren Hale, Plains
Radio Network, Inc. KPRN AM 1610 and Bar H. Farms who has publicized they have
Liberis information on their Radio program, Plains Radio. Defendants Mr. Hale, Mrs.
Hale and Sankey have admitted Liberi recently took out a loan, how did they know this
unless they illegally pulled Liberis credit and/or applied for the loan themselves. This is
serious and the Defendants must be stopped.
As a result of Taitz through Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. falsified
statements regarding Plaintiff Lisa Ostella, Ostella has lost all of clients. Unless and until
Taitz and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. are restrained from any further falsified
publications, Ostella will not be able to rebuild her clientele and therefore has no way of
earning a living.
Plaintiff Bergs damages and continued damages include loss of clients, he will be
unable to secure any clientele that reads all the fabricated statements of the Defendants,
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 18 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
19/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 15
and the continued harassment of all the Plaintiffs, without the issuance of the within
Emergency Injunction Plaintiffs privacy will continue to be violated, their personal
family affairs broadcast and e-mailed through the Internet, they will continue to be placed
in the false light before the public, they will be raped of their rights to privacy, the
posting of their personal, private affairs as well as embarrassing facts will continue to be
published through mass e-mailing and on the internet and on Defendants Mr. and Mrs.
Hales radio program, Defendant, Plains Radio.
Moreover, Taitz through Defend our Freedoms Network, Inc. have indirectly
called for harm upon the Plaintiffs. Sankey has already threatened to release whereLiberi is located and now with the publication of Liberis Social Security number, date of
birth, mothers maiden name, etc., Liberi is very easy to be found and harmed, as well as
the other Plaintiffs. For the types of damages the Plaintiffs have already suffered and
the irreparable harm they will continue to suffer, Plaintiffs will never be able to be
compensated after the fact by monetary damages. In fact, Liberi is entitled to statutory
damages totaling Four Hundred and Thirty Two Million [$432 Million] Dollars per the
three [3] Defendants, Taitz, Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc; and the Sankey Firm
and this still has not stopped them.
In addition, a woman in Houston, Texas is already using Liberis Social Security
number. Moreover, with the danger imposed by Taitz and Defend our Freedoms
Foundation, Inc., this Court must grant Plaintiffs Motion and Order Taitz and DOFF to
immediately pay Twenty Thousand [$20,000.00] Dollars to cover all of Liberis and her
familys expenses to relocated Liberi, her son and husband to ensure Taitz and Defend
our Freedoms Foundation, Inc.s threats are not carried out. Liberi as well as the entire
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 19 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
20/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 16
Plaintiffs are scared to death and are very concerned about their own lives, the lives of
their children and spouses. Counsel will provide this Court will a medical letter from
Plaintiff Liberis doctor under seal, as Liberi suffers from severe heart problems and this
type of stress is likely to end her life. This Court has the inherent power to grant this type
of immediate relief along with the Injunction. In Schalk v. Teledyne, Inc ., 751 F. Supp.
1261 (W.D. Mich. 1990), aff'd, 948 F.2d 1290 (6th Cir. 1991), for example, the Court
granted a preliminary injunction requiring the company to pay insurance premiums
pending suit in part because "the uncertainty posed by the lack of knowing just how much
money will be needed to cover medical expenses . . . poses irreparable harm in thefinancial planning burden which it places on plaintiffs," id. at 1268.
The irreparable harm requirement is met if a plaintiff demonstrates a significant
risk that he or she will experience harm that cannot adequately be compensated after the
fact by monetary damages. See Frank's GMC Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors
Corp. , 847 F.2d 100, 102-03 (3d Cir. 1988) .
B. Plaintiff Has A Very Strong Likelihood of Success on the Merits of this Case and Plaintiffs will Suffer Irreparable Harm without theissuance of the Emergency Injunction or Restraining Order:
Defendants have violated Plaintiffs First and Fourteenth Amendment violations;
illegal disclosure of a persons Social Security number, date of birth, mothers maiden
name, where one was born, etc. (CA Civil Code 1798 et sequitur); Invasion of Privacy;
Right to Privacy; Right of Publicity; harassment; endangerment; publication of private
facts; false light invasion of privacy; slander; libel; false designations and description of
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 20 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
21/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 17
facts in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125, Cyber Harassment, Cyber Stalking, Cyber
Invasion of Privacy and Cyber Right to Privacy.
Plaintiffs are in possession of the postings, e-mails sent around the United States
and Internationally as well as copies of all the audio shows. Plaintiffs are also in
possession of Taitz Dossier #6, wherein she displays all of Liberis personal identifying
information including Liberis full Social Security number. Plaintiffs are in possession
of all the e-mails distributed by Taitz, Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., Sankey,
the Sankey Firm, Sankey Investigations, Belcher, Mr. and Mrs. Hale, Plains Radio, Bar H
and KPRN.Taitz, Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., Sankey, the Sankey Firm, Sankey
Investigations, Belcher, Mr. and Mrs. Hale, Plains Radio, Bar H and KPRN e-mails,
postings, publishings and radio shows not only have been dangerous to the Plaintiffs,
they are slanderous and libelous and not only placing Liberi and the other Defendants in
danger, they are damaging the Plaintiffs businesses.
Moreover, none of the Defendants have stated any type of defense nor have they
raised affirmative defenses that are now waived. Default was entered May 27, 2009
against three [3] of the Defendants, Taitz, et al, Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc.
and The Sankey Firm.
In addition, other than Taitz and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc.s
untimely and inappropriate filings, none of the Defendants have filed any type of
Response or Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for an Emergency Injunction and/or TRO.
As for Taitz and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., they were without Standing
before this Court to file any documents other than unliquidated damages, as Default had
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 21 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
22/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 18
been previously entered. See Sierra Foods, Inc. v. Haddon House Food Prods., Inc .,
1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16667 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 22, 1992) at *14 noting in MOORE'S
FEDERAL PRACTICE, "The defaulting party []loses his standing before the court and
his right to present evidence on issues other than unliquidated damages." 6 James W.
Moore, et al., MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE, P 55.03[2] (2d ed. 1991). Thus, as
long as the Default remains in effect, the pleadings are closed and Defendants are not
entitled to put in issue their version of the facts alleged by Plaintiffs, which is the
substantive result of Taitz and DOFFs failure to timely Answer Plaintiffs Complaint on
the record of this case and the Entry of Default. See Kaplan v. Morse , 870 So. 2d 934(Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 5th Dist. 2004) at *5 (A default generally terminates a partys right
to further defend, except to contest unliquidated damages.); Dalton-Ingersoll Co. v.
Fiske , 175 Mass. 15, 20 (1899), ("[a] person defaulted has no standing in court except to
take off the default."); Thomson v. Wooster , 114 U.S. 104, 5 S.Ct. 788, 29 L.Ed. 105
(1885) (It is the law that once a default is entered, a defendant on default has no further
standing to contest the factual allegations of plaintiff's claim for relief).
By virtue of the Default, the truths of Plaintiffs well-pleaded allegations are
Admitted. They may not be contested on the merits, and have the same effect as if
established by proof. DIRECTV, Inc. v. Crumlish , 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13680 (E.D.
Pa. July 16, 2004); Comdyne I, Inc. v. Corbin, 908 F.2d 1142 (3d Cir. 1990) (quoting 10
Charles A. Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure, 2688 at 444 (1983) (citing
Thomson v. Wooster, 114 U.S. 104, 5 S. Ct. 788, 29 L. Ed. 105 (1885)) ; Duncan v. Lord ,
409 F. Supp. 687, 691 (E.D. Pa. 1976) quoting Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 38
F.R.D. 499 (S.D.N.Y. 1965) ; United States v. Borchers , 163 F.2d 347 (2 Cir. 1947)
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 22 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
23/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 19
(When a Court determines, . . . that a defendant is in default, its liability to the plaintiff is
deemed established and the plaintiff is not required to establish his right to recover.). See
also I.C.C. v. Smith , 82 F.Supp.39 (D.C.Pa.1949). Defendant is deemed to have
Admitted all well pleaded allegations in the Complaint. At the most, all that
Defendant can do is question the extent of the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs. Trans
World Airline, Inc. v. Hughes, 332 F.2d 602 (2d Cir. 1964), reversed on other grounds,
409 U.S. 363, 93 S.Ct. 647, 34 L.Ed.2d 577 (1973).
See Caribbean Produce Exchange v. Caribe Hydro-Trailer, Inc. , 65 F.R.D. 46, 48
(D.C. Puerto Rico 1974) (subsequent to entry of default, defendant's argument of a late propounded affirmative defense was improper). Taylor v. City of Ballwin, Missouri, et al ,
859 F.2d 1330 (1988) (same), quoting Caribbean , supra and Thomson , supra .
An important factor animating our holding is our respect for the extraordinary
nature of the preliminary injunction power. We have repeatedly insisted that the use of
judicial power to arrange relationships prior to a full determination on the merits is a
weighty matter, and the preliminary injunction device should not be exercised unless the
moving party shows that it specifically and personally risks irreparable harm. See, e.g.,
Campbell Soup Co. v. ConAgra Inc ., 977 F.2d 86, 91 (3d Cir. 1992); Frank's GMC Truck
Center , 847 F.2d at 102-03. This clearly has been met as all the Defendants have
waived their right to any affirmative defenses and have failed to cite any type of defenses
in their Answers, thus the allegations in Plaintiffs Complaint are deemed admitted.
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 23 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
24/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 20
B. There Will Be Minimal Harm to the Defendants if Relief is Grantedand The Public Interest Supports a Grant of Relief:
Granting Plaintiffs Motion for an Emergency Injunction or Restraining Order
will result in negligible harm, if any, to Defendants as Plaintiffs are merely attempting to
protect their private confidential information; their privacy; false information being sent out,
etc.
Consideration of the relative harm to the Defendant and the public interest also
weighs heavily in favor of Plaintiffs. See Adams , 204 F.3d at 484 (noting district court
should consider these two elements where relevant). First, the irreparable harm Plaintiffs
would suffer in the absence of a preliminary injunction substantially outweighs the harm to
the Defendants from the preliminary injunction ordered. Moreover, issuing a preliminary
injunction against the Defendants will not adversely affect the public interest. To the
contrary, the prevention of First and Fourteenth Amendment violations; illegal disclosure of
a persons Social Security number, date of birth, mothers maiden name, where one was
born, etc. (CA Civil Code 1798 et sequitur); Invasion of Privacy; Right to Privacy; Right of
Publicity; harassment; endangerment; publication of private facts; false light invasion of
privacy; slander; libel; false designations and description of facts in violation of 15 U.S.C.
1125, Cyber Harassment, Cyber Stalking, Cyber Invasion of Privacy, Cyber Right to Privacy,
even that affecting only private citizens, is in the general public interest." F.T. Int'l, Ltd. v.
Mason , 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14979 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2000), at *2. See also United States
ex rel. Rahman v. Oncology Assocs. , 198 F.3d 489, 496-97 (4th Cir. 1999).
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 24 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
25/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 21
III. CONCLUSION
Plaintiffs have demonstrated a very strong likelihood of success that Plaintiffs
will suffer irreparable injury, if relief is denied; the balance of hardships imposes little
burden on the Defendants; and the public interest supports the granting of the requested
relief.
For the above aforementioned reasons, this Honorable Court should grant
Plaintiffs request for an Emergency Injunction or Restraining Order and Order the
following:
A. Grant Plaintiffs Motion for an Emergency Injunction and/or Restraining Order prohibiting the Defendants from any further slander and/or
libel;
B. An immediate Order enjoining the Defendants Orly Taitz, Esquire
a/k/a Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly Taitz a/k/a Orly
Taitz, Inc; Defend our Freedoms Foundation; Neil Sankey; The Sankey Firm,
Sankey Investigations, Inc; Linda Sue Belcher a/k/a Linda S. Belcher a/k/a Linda
Starr a/k/a Newwomensparty a/k/a Stitchenwitch a/k/a Eva Braun a/k/a Web
Sergeant a/k/a Katy a/k/a www.obamacitizenshipdebate.org ; Edgar (Ed) Hale
a/k/a JD Smith; Caren Hale; Bar H Farms; Plains Radio Network, Inc. a/k/a Plains
Radio; and KPRN AM 1610 and all parties acting on their behalf from airing
and/or publishing any defamatory or false statements about Plaintiffs, Lisa Liberi,
Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Evelyn Adams, Lisa
Ostella, Go Excel Global, the Plaintiffs family members, etc. via the internet or
any other print or electronic medium or broadcasts and/or radio, from portraying
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 25 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
26/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 22
Plaintiffs in a false-light via the internet or another print or electronic medium or
broadcasts and/or radio, untrue statements about the Plaintiffs; enjoin the
Defendants from any further harassment of the Plaintiffs, enjoin Defendants
from the filing and reporting of falsified criminal activity, etc.
C. An immediate Order enjoining Defendants Taitz, Defend our
Freedoms Foundation, Inc., Neil Sankey, the Sankey Firm and Sankey
Investigations, Inc., and any party on their behalf from disseminating Liberis
Social Security number, date of birth, name, where she was born, mothers
maiden name, where she lives, etc.D. An immediate Order of Retraction against Defendants Taitz,
Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc., Neil Sankey, the Sankey Firm and Sankey
Investigations, Inc., and any party who has published Liberis confidential
information on their behalves to immediately retract and remove Liberis private
confidential information, including but not limited to her Social Security number,
date of birth, where she resides, her mothers maiden name, where she was born,
information about her husband, etc.
E. A Court Order directed at the Social Security Administration for
the Social Security Administration to issue Lisa Liberi a new Social Security
number;
F. An immediate Order that Defendant Orly Taitz, Esquire and
Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. immediately pay Twenty Thousand
[$20,000.00] Dollars within seventy-two [72] hours through this Court payable to
Plaintiff Lisa Liberi for the relocation of Mrs. Liberi and her family as a result of
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 26 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
27/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 23
the private confidential information Mrs. Taitz has posted, sent out via e-mail,
sent out through the Internet RSS feed, etc.
G. Grant Plaintiffs Attorney fees in the amount of Five Thousand
Dollars [$5,000.00] payable to Philip J. Berg, Esquire within Seventy-Two [72]
hours and such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Philip J. BergDated: June 23, 2009 _____________________________
Philip J. Berg, EsquireAttorney for the Plaintiffs555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Identification No. 09867(610) 825-3134
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 27 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
28/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 24
EXHIBIT 1
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 28 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
29/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 25
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=2522
Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire Defend Our Freedoms Foundation 26302 La Paz ste 211, Mission Viejo CA 92691Copyright 2009
Previous Post Ties to Everett, need help with research
,
You mentioned Everett, Wash. connection with Barack Obamas mothers family. Justwondering if you knew that connection went back for over a century
http://www.heraldnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081026/NEWS01/710269867
Plus a bit more about the Wolfleys:http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/world/ci_12517525
So with a POTUS with a Muslim father and German roots mother, why shouldnt Israelis be worried?
If you do post this info, please dont mention my name or email.
Cheers
ResponseI am really concerned about several coincidences1. a man who threatened to shoot me and burn my body for the world to see was trackedto a computer server in Everett WA. Another person that threatened me was traced toChauhelis WA and yet another one to Canada (from what I understand not far from the
border with WA state). A few days after the threat there was a clamp missing and adisconnected fumes emissions hose in my car and my husbands car died, suddenly a fusewas missing.2. Obama does not talk about it, but his mother wasnt in HI when he was a baby, she wasenrolled in the U of Seattle WA from August 1961-till June 1962, which means that as a
baby he lived in WA.3. Lisa Liberi, assistant for Berg, who has a lengthy criminal record of grand theft,forgery of documents and forgery of official seal doesnt talk about it, but accordingto records she was born in WA state. From what I recall Bellview WA. (her name atbirth was Lisa Richardson. From what I recall father -Jack Richardson, motherShirley Wadell)
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 29 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
30/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 26
4. Obama, Liberi and Obamas mother Stanley Ann Dunham- all have multiplesocial security numbers according to databases.5. Liberi was convicted of forgery of documents and according to experts, there aremultiple signs of forgery in Obamas documents.6. Stanley Ann Dunham also went by the name Shirley Ann Dunham.
We found a Dunham organization, owned by Shirley Ann Dunham; one locationwas in Seattle another in Bellview WA. They dealt with insurances, lawyers,mortgages- you can get ss numbers from all of these records.7. From what I recall, there was a discrepancy between Intellius records and Secretary of state records. According to the sec. of state a man owned that co. One of our volunteers
pulled court records in Bellview for the Dunham organization. This man, Mr. Dunham(dont remember first name) kept changing his middle initial in several court cases,which was suspicious by itself.8. There was a very strange newspaper article in WA (I believe Seattle), from what Irecall, when Obama supposedly was in Columbia. It stated that one, Roman Obamastudied at the university of Patrice Lumumba in Moscow, Russia, and had some financial
difficulties.9. When grandma Dunham got sick, a reporter from WA (I believe Seattle) has writen aninterview with Charles Payne, saying the grandma got a broken hip. She was dead of cancer a few days later. I was wondering, why did it come out in WA, and not HI or IL?10. Based on all of the above, I have a nagging feeling, that there is somebody there inWA, some relative of Obama, somebody who we might think is no longer with us.
This entry was posted on Monday, June 22nd, 2009 at 3:35 pm and is filed under Uncategorized . You canfollow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response , or trackback fromyour own site.
[emphasis added ]
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 30 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
31/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 27
EXHIBIT 2
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 31 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
32/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 28
http://www.lexis.com/research/smb/tp/legalhome/?_b=0_421767556
View: Results List | Full
1 of 2
Search: Locate a Person (Nationwide) Search > Search Results > Source DocumentsTerms: ssn( 622-19-xxxx ) state( ALL ) radius( 30 ) ( Edit Search | New Search )
SelectforDelivery
Historical Person LocatorThis data is for informational purposes only.
Finder InformationName: NASH, SHOLANDA
HARRIS COUNTY
Important: The Public Records and commercially available data sources used on reports have errors. Data is sometimes enteredpoorly, processed incorrectly and is generally not free from defect. This system should not be relied upon as definitively accurate.Before relying on any data this system supplies, it should be independently verified. For Secretary of State documents, thefollowing data is for information purposes only a nd is not an official record. Certified copies may be obtained from that individualstate's Department of State.
About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us Copyright 2009 LexisNexis , a division of ReedElsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
View: Results List | Full
1 - 2 of 2
Search: Public Records > Locate a Person (Nationwide) Search > Search Results
Terms: ssn( 622-19-xxxx ) state( ALL ) radius( 30 ) ( Edit Search | New Search )
Select for Delivery or View Checked
No.
Full Name Address Phone SSN
View SourceDocuments
1. NASH,SHOLANDA
910 CYPRESSSTATION DR APTHOUSTON, TX 77090-1502HARRIS COU
622-19-XXXX (2000)SSN linked to multiplepeople
SSN: 622-19-XXXX
DR. APTHOUSTON, TX 77090-1502
Address: 910 CYPRESS STATION
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 32 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
33/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 29
EXHIBIT 3
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 33 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
34/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 30
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=36
Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire Defend Our Freedoms Foundation 26302 La Paz ste 211, Mission Viejo CA 92691Copyright 2009
KY secretary of state Million Patriots march Follow up on Lisa Liberi, paralegal to Phil Berg
In regards to Lisa Liberi, assistant to Phil Berg. As I stated, she has an extensive criminalrecord of forgery, forgery of seal, grand theft and so on. Lisa Liberi was stating that it isnot her, that it is another Lisa Liber, and that she lives in PA and not NM, however this isnot true. She lives in NM, her home phone number and address is in NM and this can beverified with the probation officer Joanne Martinez fax 505-476-2368, phone 505-827-8627.
I corresponded with John Hemenway ESQ, who filed Hollister v Soetoro case in DC for Phil Berg and he stated that Lisa Liberi, who works for Berg lives in NM. When his sonwas buying a truck in NM, she told him, that she lives there and can assist.
One of former volunteers for Phil Berg has written a statement and went with me to FBIin San Antonio and reported that Lisa Liberi, who works for Berg lives in Santa Fe, NMand she sent Christmas presents to Lisa to NM. Today many employees andvolunteers work from home and correspond via e-mails and phone calls. This volunteer stated that Lisa Liberi corresponds via e-mails and phone. A person will not make areport with FBI and risk going to jail unless she provides a truthful statement. She alsorecorded this statement on video.
I had three confirmations from 3 independent sources of the findings of licensedinvestigator Mr. Sankey Before I posted dossier #6. After all the revelations the name of Lisa Liberi in Mr. Bergs site was changed to Agent88.
I believe, that when non-profit organizations are involved and donations are collected,one should not employ people that are questionable and particularly people that have alengthy criminal record that includes forgery, forgery of seals and grand theft.
I have closed the pay pal account, when I saw that Lisa Ostella has redirected the theDefend Our Freedoms blog and redirected the pay pal. Now there is no pay-pal for thisfoundation and there will not be any more questions. I will be setting a direct visa/creditcard donation button , where donations will go directly to the foundation, so there willnot be a problem of someone redirecting donations by changing the e-mail address on the
pay pal button.
Yet another important matter. So far none of Obama eligibility matters have gone to trialand we all are working hard to change it. But lets say one such case goes to trial. We
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 34 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
35/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 31
dont want to be impeached by Obamas attorneys saying that we knowinglyemployed shady characters, who mightve supplied us with incorrect information. Justlike the country needs to be purged of Obama and his clique, that are in power byvirtue of forgery, fraud and consealment of vital records, the patriots of this countryneed to purge their ranks.
This entry was posted on Saturday, April 18th, 2009 at 2:29 pm and is filed under Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both commentsand pings are currently closed.
Comments are closed.
Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire is proudly powered by WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) .
[emphasis added]
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 35 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
36/37
Z:\Liberi Injunction 06 09 32
Law Offices of:Philip J. Berg, Esquire555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Identification No. 09867(610) 825-3134 Attorney for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA LIBERI, et al,Plaintiffs,
vs.ORLY TAITZ, et al,
Defendants.
:::::::
:::
Case No.: 09-cv-01898-ECR
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, hereby certify that a copy of Plaintiffs Emergency
Motion for the Issuance of Plaintiffs Injunction or Restraining Order Requested
Plaintiffs Motion filed and Docketed as Document No. 3 on May 27, 2009 was served
this 23 rd day of June 2009 electronically upon the following:
Orly Taitz, et al.31912 Monarch Crest
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677Email: [email protected]
Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. a/k/a
Defend our Freedoms Foundation26302 La Paz, Suite 211Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Email: [email protected]
Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 66 Filed 06/23/2009 Page 36 of 37
8/14/2019 LIBERI v TAITZ - Berg Motion for Injunction/TRO - 3
37/37