Upload
martha-ayala
View
55
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LHC performance with low-emittance h=9 beam Focus on emittance preservation. M. Kuhn, H. Bartosik, B. Dehning, A. Guerrero Ollacarizqueta, V. Kain, F. Roncarolo, M. Sapinski, M. Schaumann, G. Trad. h=9 Beam from Injectors. nom bunches. h=9 bunches. 1.1 x 10 11. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
LHC
LHC performance with low-emittance h=9 beam
Focus on emittance preservation
M. Kuhn, H. Bartosik, B. Dehning, A. Guerrero Ollacarizqueta, V. Kain, F. Roncarolo, M. Sapinski, M. Schaumann, G. Trad
1
LHC
h=9 Beam from Injectorso At SPS flattop: trans. emittance ~ 1 m, 1.1 x 1011 per bunch, 3 % scraping
o In the LHC: 1.1 x 1011 per bunch
− Filling scheme: 6 nominal 50 ns
+ 32 h=9 50 ns
2
nom bunches
h=9 bunches
Distribution of bunch intensities in the LHC
1.1 x 1011
LHC
Emittance Evolution through Cycle
o Low intensity ( # bunches = 38) → wire scanners
− Soft interlock level reached at 4 x 1012 at 4 TeV
→ needed to get expert to increase threshold to 4.5 x 1012
→ no measurements at flattop and during squeeze
− Intensity limit at wire scanners changed to 2.7 x 1013 protons at injection and 5.8 x 1012 at 4 TeV
o Evolution during squeeze from Enrico’s expert fast scan of BSRT.
− 200 ms per bunch
o Wire scan measurements to compare with luminosity data
o Following plots show average of 6 bunch batch and 32 bunch batch
o Measured beta functions are used
− Preliminary K-modulation results at wire scanners
o Error bars include statistical error from averaging, beta function error3
LHC
o Bunch-by-bunch emittance at injection – different performance of PSB rings
− Larger emittances for vertical plane
Emittance at injection
4Small beams at injection
n = 1.005 ± 0.075
n = 1.07 ± 0.026
n = 1.169 ± 0.05
n = 1.252 ± 0.039
LHC
The Rampo MD data suggests:
− MDs with single bunches
→ No “measurable” growth for vertical plane during ramp
→ Beams are growing in the horizontal plane
− More for beam 2 than for beam 1
− Beam 2 ~ 0.5 m for initial emittance of 2.1 m
o This year issues with understanding optics:
− Initial results indicated non-physically smaller normalized emittances at flattop versus injection
− No beta measurements during ramp, do not use data
− Only compare injection data with flattop
5
Do not look at the values during the ramp
LHC
Vertical Planeo No measurable growth in vertical
plane during injection plateau!
o No WS values available at flattop
o Compare with data some time in collision already
o Growth injection – collision
− < 0.2 m
o Note also, growth during collisions: ~ 0.1 m in 10min
6
Beam [plane] Injection emittance [μm]
Nom bunches h=9 bunches
B1 [V] 1.891 ± 0.078 1.169 ± 0.05
B2 [V] 1.986 ± 0.056 1.252 ± 0.039
Collision emittance [μm]
B1 [V] 1.83 ± 0.095 1.274 ± 0.087
B2 [V] 2.148 ± 0.119 1.398 ± 0.086
Total emittance growth through cycle in vertical plane max. 10%, probably smaller. No measurement right after start of collisions.
Non colliding bunches also grow
LHC
Horizontal Plane
7
o Strong emittance blow-up during injection plateau
– Beam 1: 0.22 m, beam 2: 0.16 m
– Suspect IBS
o Ramp: compare injection with data after some time in collision
– Contribution injection: 15 – 22 %
– Contribution ramp/squeeze: 16 – 18 %
Beam [plane] Injection emittance [μm]
Nom bunches h=9 bunches
B1 [H] 1.772 ± 0.135 1.005 ± 0.075
B2 [H] 1.848 ± 0.006 1.07 ± 0.026
Collision emittance [μm]
B1 [H] 2.159 ± 0.113 1.43 ± 0.072
B2 [H] 2.286 ± 0.185 1.454 ± 0.166
In total ~ 40 % blow- up in the horizontal plane ! (caveat: not measured straight after collision)
LHC
Squeezeo No significant blow-up during the squeeze
o Within measurement accuracy the beam sizes are constant during the squeeze
o Results from earlier 2012 measurement not reproduced
− B1 H emittance was blowing up ~ 15 %
8
Emittances conserved during squeeze
LHC
Emittance from Luminosityo Arriving with small emittances in collision
o Compare with emittance from wire scanners (averaged over several profiles)
o Errors large, but significant difference between wire scanner emittance and luminosity emittance:
− ~ 20%
→ Working on trying to understand difference?
o Blow-up from SPS → LHC collisions: ~ 50 % !!!− Convoluted emittance at LHC injection to collision :1.12 m → 1.7 m
o Compare to nominal 50 ns (physics fills): ~ 40 %
− Convoluted emittance LHC injection to collision: 1.7 m → 2.4 m
9
Wire scanners CMS luminosity ATLAS luminosity
Convoluted emittance [μm]
1.388 ± 0.102 1.751 ± 0.263 1.686 ± 0.253
LHC
Summaryo 1 m beams from the injectors with 1.1 x 1011 ppb successfully produced
o Significant blow-up in H while waiting at LHC injection plateau
− ~ 19 %
o Significant blow-up during the ramp in H plane.
− ~ 17 %
o Total blow-up until collision from LHC injection (using LHC luminosity emittances):
− ~ 50 %
o But…doubt on emittance values from luminosity.
o Performance reach of h=9 beam (naïve approach – assume same filling scheme, shorter trains):
− h=9: 1.1 x 1011 protons, = 1.7 m
− 50 ns nominal: 1.6 x 1011 protons, = 2.4 m
− h=9/50ns_nom ~ 60 %
10