3
Letter to the Editor Response to: Comment on (Efficacy of 7-Day and 14-Day Triple Therapy Regimens for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: A Comparative Study in a Cohort of Romanian Patients) Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone, 1 Giorgio Saracco, 2 and Rinaldo Pellicano 3 1 General and Specialist Medicine Department, City of the Health and Science of Turin, Bramante Avenue 88, 10126 Turin, Italy 2 Oncology Department, University of Turin, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy 3 Department of Gastroenterology, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy Correspondence should be addressed to Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone; davrib [email protected] Received 25 March 2016; Accepted 8 June 2016 Academic Editor: Spiros D. Ladas Copyright © 2016 Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In a recent Letter to the Editor [1], Talebi Bezmin Abadi commented on the paper by Arama et al. [2], in which the authors concluded that a 2-week regimen (Proton Pump inhibitor, plus Clarithromycin plus Amoxicillin) is preferable to a 7-day regimen as first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In his Letter, Talebi Bezmin Abadi con- cluded that “Certainly, preantibiotic susceptibility tests are inevitable approach in H. pylori therapy.” Although we agree with all comments, we found the conclusion inappropriate. e 4th Maastricht/Florence Consensus Conference rec- ommended abandoning clarithromycin in empirical treat- ment when the prevalence of resistance is higher than 15–20% [3]. In the paper by Arama et al. [2], the overall eradica- tion rate observed was 70.5%: the number of patients who responded to treatment was significantly greater in the 14-day treatment (84.6%) group compared to patients who received the 7-day treatment (42.3%) ( < 0.001). An acceptable eradication rate is differently defined in literature (>75% [4], 90–95% [5]) and the clinicians should “use only what works locally” ignoring consensus statements and society guidelines if these are not consistent with local treatment results [6]. Moreover, antibiotic resistance should be considered as a dynamic concept, since its prevalence can change not only among different countries, but also between two different periods in the same area [7]. A culture-based approach, in clinical practice, is oſten unfeasible and its cost may be hard to afford [8]. Furthermore, the whole process needs a standard of quality (in terms of both materials used for culture and skill of the microbiologist to grow H. pylori) that cannot be assured everywhere [7]. Probably, the cost-effectiveness of the culture-based approach may change depending on host-related factors (bleeding, use of certain drugs) and methodology-related factors (number of gastric biopsies, conditions of transport, and laboratory characteristics) [7]. ese factors may be favorable in some settings compared to others. Hence, in the year 2016 a culture-guided treatment must be taken into account only in settings with experience in this issue and aſter failure of previous regimens. Disclosure e contents of this review paper are the sole responsibility of the authors and necessarily represent personal perspective. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Gastroenterology Research and Practice Volume 2016, Article ID 4760378, 2 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4760378

Letter to the Editor Response to: Comment on Efficacy of 7-Day … · 2020. 1. 14. · Letter to the Editor Response to: Comment on (Efficacy of 7-Day and 14-Day Triple Therapy Regimens

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Letter to the EditorResponse to: Comment on (Efficacy of 7-Day and 14-Day TripleTherapy Regimens for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori:A Comparative Study in a Cohort of Romanian Patients)

    Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone,1 Giorgio Saracco,2 and Rinaldo Pellicano3

    1General and Specialist Medicine Department, City of the Health and Science of Turin, Bramante Avenue 88, 10126 Turin, Italy2Oncology Department, University of Turin, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy3Department of Gastroenterology, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy

    Correspondence should be addressed to Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone; davrib [email protected]

    Received 25 March 2016; Accepted 8 June 2016

    Academic Editor: Spiros D. Ladas

    Copyright © 2016 Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work isproperly cited.

    In a recent Letter to the Editor [1], Talebi Bezmin Abadicommented on the paper by Arama et al. [2], in which theauthors concluded that a 2-week regimen (Proton Pumpinhibitor, plus Clarithromycin plus Amoxicillin) is preferableto a 7-day regimen as first-line therapy forHelicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection. In his Letter, Talebi Bezmin Abadi con-cluded that “Certainly, preantibiotic susceptibility tests areinevitable approach in H. pylori therapy.” Although we agreewith all comments, we found the conclusion inappropriate.

    The 4th Maastricht/Florence Consensus Conference rec-ommended abandoning clarithromycin in empirical treat-ment when the prevalence of resistance is higher than 15–20%[3].

    In the paper by Arama et al. [2], the overall eradica-tion rate observed was 70.5%: the number of patients whoresponded to treatment was significantly greater in the 14-daytreatment (84.6%) group compared to patients who receivedthe 7-day treatment (42.3%) (𝑝 < 0.001).

    An acceptable eradication rate is differently defined inliterature (>75% [4], ≥ 90–95% [5]) and the clinicians should“use only what works locally” ignoring consensus statementsand society guidelines if these are not consistent with localtreatment results [6]. Moreover, antibiotic resistance should

    be considered as a dynamic concept, since its prevalence canchange not only among different countries, but also betweentwo different periods in the same area [7].

    A culture-based approach, in clinical practice, is oftenunfeasible and its costmay be hard to afford [8]. Furthermore,the whole process needs a standard of quality (in terms ofbothmaterials used for culture and skill of the microbiologistto grow H. pylori) that cannot be assured everywhere [7].Probably, the cost-effectiveness of the culture-based approachmay change depending on host-related factors (bleeding, useof certain drugs) and methodology-related factors (numberof gastric biopsies, conditions of transport, and laboratorycharacteristics) [7]. These factors may be favorable in somesettings compared to others.

    Hence, in the year 2016 a culture-guided treatment mustbe taken into account only in settings with experience in thisissue and after failure of previous regimens.

    Disclosure

    The contents of this review paper are the sole responsibility ofthe authors and necessarily represent personal perspective.

    Hindawi Publishing CorporationGastroenterology Research and PracticeVolume 2016, Article ID 4760378, 2 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4760378

  • 2 Gastroenterology Research and Practice

    Competing Interests

    The authors declare that the research was conducted in theabsence of any commercial or financial relationships thatcould be construed as a potential conflict of interests.

    References

    [1] A. Talebi Bezmin Abadi, “Comment on ‘Efficacy of 7-day and14-day triple therapy regimens for the eradication of Heli-cobacter pylori: a comparative study in a cohort of Romanianpatients’,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2016,Article ID 1342398, 2 pages, 2016.

    [2] S. S. Arama, C. Tiliscan, C. Negoita et al., “Efficacy of 7-day and 14-day triple therapy regimens for the eradicationof Helicobacter pylori: A Comparative Study in a Cohort ofRomanian Patients,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice,vol. 2016, Article ID 5061640, 7 pages, 2016.

    [3] P. Malfertheiner, F. Megraud, C. A. O’Morain et al., “Manage-ment of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht IV/flor-ence consensus report,” Gut, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 646–664, 2012.

    [4] J. P. Gisbert, X. Calvet, A. O’Connor, F. Mégraud, and C. A.O’Morain, “Sequential therapy for helicobacter pylori eradica-tion: a critical review,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol.44, no. 5, pp. 313–325, 2010.

    [5] D. Y. Graham, “Helicobacter pylori update: gastric cancer,reliable therapy, and possible benefits,” Gastroenterology, vol.148, no. 4, pp. 719.e3–731.e3, 2015.

    [6] D. Y. Graham and L. Fischbach, “Helicobacter pylori treatmentin the era of increasing antibiotic resistance,” Gut, vol. 59, no. 8,pp. 1143–1153, 2010.

    [7] G. Cammarota, G. Ianiro, S. Bibbò et al., “Culture-guidedtreatment approach for Helicobacter pylori infection: review ofthe literature,”World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 18,pp. 5205–5211, 2014.

    [8] R. M. Zagari, M. Romano, V. Ojetti et al., “Guidelines for themanagement of Helicobacter pylori infection in Italy: the IIIWorking Group Consensus Report 2015,” Digestive and LiverDisease, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 903–912, 2015.

  • Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

    Stem CellsInternational

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

    of

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Behavioural Neurology

    EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Disease Markers

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    BioMed Research International

    OncologyJournal of

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    PPAR Research

    The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Journal of

    ObesityJournal of

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

    OphthalmologyJournal of

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Diabetes ResearchJournal of

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Research and TreatmentAIDS

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Gastroenterology Research and Practice

    Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

    Parkinson’s Disease

    Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

    Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com