1
LETTER TO THE EDITOR To the Editor: The purpose of this letter is to comment on the boundary-layer model used by Vennela et al. 1 in their article entitled “Sherwood Number in Flow Through Parallel Porous Plates (Microchannel) due to Pressure and Electroosmotic Flow.” The transport of an electrically neutral sol- ute that is retained by a semipermeable wall of the slit microchannel is modeled within the mass-transfer boundary layer as ðA 1 yÞ @c @x 2 Pe w 4 @c @y 5 @ 2 c @y 2 ; A 1 5 3 16 ReSc d e L mðkh; RÞ; Pe w 5 v w d e D (1) where ðA 1 yÞ is the dimensionless axial electro- lyte solution velocity (assumed a linear func- tion of wall distance y and independent of the axial position x) and Pe w ðxÞ is the dimension- less permeation velocity assumed inversely proportional to the thickness of the mass- transfer boundary layer dðxÞ5ðx=A 1 Þ 1=3 . The authors derive to the following expression for the Sherwood number ShðxÞ5 4 I A 1 x 1=3 ; I5 ð 1 0 exp ð2g 3 =92BgÞdg (2) where B5 Pe w =ð6A 1=3 1 Þ is a constant depending on the length averaged permeation parameter Pe w . We would like to point out that the solvent permeation through the porous wall may affect significantly the axial flow rate (for a fixed pressure gradient) for high values of the ratio a5 Pe w =ðReScd e =LÞ like those investigated by the authors (e.g., Pe w 51000 and ðReScd e =LÞ54000Þ so that the dependence of the axial velocity on the axial position must be taken into account. Therefore, we solve the boundary layer equation Eq. 1 by replacing ðA 1 yÞ with A 1 ysðxÞ, s(x) being a function of the axial posi- tion and the ratio a. We adopt the same bound- ary conditions as Vennela et al. 1 We introduce a similarity variable g5y=dðxÞ where dðxÞ5A 21=3 1 =gðxÞ is the thickness of the bound- ary layer which depends on a function g(x) to be determined to have an invariant solution cðx; yÞ5f ðgÞ d 2 f dg 2 5 df dg 2 Pe w 4A 1=3 1 gðxÞ 1 g 2 sðxÞ gðxÞ 4 dg dx ! ; Pe w 4A 1=3 1 gðxÞ f j 0 2 df dg 0 50; f j g!1 51 (3) If we assume, according with Vennela et al., 1 that the permeation flux through the porous wall (Pe w ) is inversely proportional to d, we have Pew 4A 1=3 1 gðxÞ 5B5constant . To have an invariant solution satisfying the boundary con- ditions, we enforce 2 dg dx 52 1 3 gðxÞ 4 sðxÞ ; 1=gð0Þ50 ) gðxÞ5 ð x 0 dx 0 sðx 0 Þ dx 0 21=3 (4) thus, obtaining for the pointwise Sherwood number the following expression ShðxÞ5 4 I ðA 1 Þ 1=3 gðxÞ; I5 ð 1 0 exp ð2g 3 =92BgÞdg; B5 Pe w 4A 1=3 1 ð 1 0 gðx 0 Þdx 0 21 (5) It should be observed that, by assuming sðxÞ51, that is, by neglecting the variation of the axial velocity along the axial coordinate x, one recovers the result by Venuela et al. 1 because gðxÞ5x 21=3 . From a simple material balance, if we assume a uniform permeation velocity equal to the average permeation velocity Pe w , the axial velocity function s(x) turns out to be a linear decreasing function x, that is, sðxÞ5112a ð122xÞ. Figure 1 shows the comparison between Eq. 2 derived from Vennela et al. 1 and Eq. 5 for two different values of a. It can be observed that Eq. 2 neglecting spatial variation of the axial velocity (i.e., sðxÞ51) significantly overestimates the pointwise Sh for x > 0:5. Therefore, Eq. 5 must be adopted for a 0:1. Alessandra Adrover and Augusta Pedacchia La Sapienza Universit a di Roma Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Materiali, Ambiente Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Literature Cited 1. Vennela N, Mondal S, De S, Bhattacharjee S. Sherwood number in flow through paral- lel porous plates (Microchannel) due to pressure and electroosmotic flow. AIChE J. 2012;58:1693–1703. 2. Adrover A, Pedacchia A, Mass transfer through laminar boundary layer in micro- channels with nonuniform cross section: the effect of wall shape and curvature, Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2013;60:624–631. Figure 1. Log-normal plot of Sh(x) versus x for two different values of a5 Pe w =ðReScd e =LÞ. R 5 0 (purely pressure driven flow). [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.] V C 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers DOI 10.1002/aic.14272 Published online November 4, 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). AIChE Journal December 2013 Vol. 59, No. 12 Published on behalf of the AIChE DOI 10.1002/aic 4887

Letter to the editor

  • Upload
    augusta

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

To the Editor:

The purpose of this letter is to comment on

the boundary-layer model used by Vennela

et al.1 in their article entitled “Sherwood

Number in Flow Through Parallel Porous

Plates (Microchannel) due to Pressure and

Electroosmotic Flow.”

The transport of an electrically neutral sol-

ute that is retained by a semipermeable wall

of the slit microchannel is modeled within the

mass-transfer boundary layer as

ðA1yÞ @c

@x2

Pew

4

@c

@y5@2c

@y2;

A153

16ReSc

de

L

� �mðkh;RÞ; Pew5

vwde

D(1)

where ðA1yÞ is the dimensionless axial electro-

lyte solution velocity (assumed a linear func-

tion of wall distance y and independent of the

axial position x) and PewðxÞ is the dimension-

less permeation velocity assumed inversely

proportional to the thickness of the mass-

transfer boundary layer dðxÞ5ðx=A1Þ1=3.

The authors derive to the following expression

for the Sherwood number

ShðxÞ5 4

I

A1

x

� �1=3

; I5

ð10

exp ð2g3=92BgÞdg

(2)

where B5Pew=ð6A1=31 Þ is a constant depending

on the length averaged permeation parameter

Pew .

We would like to point out that the solvent

permeation through the porous wall may affect

significantly the axial flow rate (for a fixed

pressure gradient) for high values of the ratio

a5Pew=ðReScde=LÞ like those investigated by

the authors (e.g., Pew 51000 and

ðReScde=LÞ54000Þ so that the dependence of

the axial velocity on the axial position must be

taken into account.

Therefore, we solve the boundary layer

equation Eq. 1 by replacing ðA1yÞ with

A1ysðxÞ, s(x) being a function of the axial posi-

tion and the ratio a. We adopt the same bound-

ary conditions as Vennela et al.1 We introduce

a similarity variable g5y=dðxÞ where

dðxÞ5A21=31 =gðxÞ is the thickness of the bound-

ary layer which depends on a function g(x) to

be determined to have an invariant solution

cðx; yÞ5f ðgÞ

d2f

dg25

df

dg2

Pew

4A1=31 gðxÞ

1g2sðxÞgðxÞ4

dg

dx

!;

Pew

4A1=31 gðxÞ

f j02df

dg

����0

50; f jg!151 (3)

If we assume, according with Vennela

et al.,1 that the permeation flux through the

porous wall (Pew) is inversely proportional to

d, we have Pew

4A1=3

1gðxÞ

5B5constant . To have an

invariant solution satisfying the boundary con-

ditions, we enforce2

dg

dx52

1

3

gðxÞ4

sðxÞ ; 1=gð0Þ50

) gðxÞ5ðx

0

dx0

sðx0Þdx0� �21=3

(4)

thus, obtaining for the pointwise Sherwood

number the following expression

ShðxÞ5 4

IðA1Þ1=3gðxÞ;

I5

ð10

exp ð2g3=92BgÞdg;

B5Pew

4A1=31

�ð1

0

gðx0Þdx0�21

(5)

It should be observed that, by assuming

sðxÞ51, that is, by neglecting the variation of

the axial velocity along the axial coordinate x,

one recovers the result by Venuela et al.1

because gðxÞ5x21=3.

From a simple material balance, if we

assume a uniform permeation velocity equal to

the average permeation velocity Pew , the axial

velocity function s(x) turns out to be a linear

decreasing function x, that is, sðxÞ5112að122xÞ.

Figure 1 shows the comparison between

Eq. 2 derived from Vennela et al.1 and Eq. 5

for two different values of a. It can be

observed that Eq. 2 neglecting spatial variation

of the axial velocity (i.e., sðxÞ51) significantly

overestimates the pointwise Sh for x > 0:5.

Therefore, Eq. 5 must be adopted for a � 0:1.

Alessandra Adrover and Augusta PedacchiaLa Sapienza Universit�a di Roma

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Materiali,Ambiente

Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, ItalyE-mail: [email protected]

Literature Cited

1. Vennela N, Mondal S, De S, BhattacharjeeS. Sherwood number in flow through paral-lel porous plates (Microchannel) due topressure and electroosmotic flow. AIChE J.2012;58:1693–1703.

2. Adrover A, Pedacchia A, Mass transferthrough laminar boundary layer in micro-channels with nonuniform cross section:the effect of wall shape and curvature, IntJ Heat Mass Transfer. 2013;60:624–631.

Figure 1. Log-normal plot of Sh(x) versus x for two different values ofa5Pew=ðReScde=LÞ. R 5 0 (purely pressure driven flow).

[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at

wileyonlinelibrary.com.]

VC 2013 American Institute of Chemical EngineersDOI 10.1002/aic.14272Published online November 4, 2013 in WileyOnline Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).

AIChE Journal December 2013 Vol. 59, No. 12 Published on behalf of the AIChE DOI 10.1002/aic 4887