Upload
caljics
View
38
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Demands Nicklas recants the slander that he has broadcasted on the internet
Citation preview
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 1/13
NOTICE
&
DEMAND
TO RETRACT & CORREC'T
DEFAMATORY
SLANDEROUS LIBELOUS STA|I'EMENTS
OF
Nicklas
Hoffman
&
Richard
Rodriguez OR BE SUBJEC'I'
TO
COURT
ACTION
FOR DEFAMATION
OF
CHARACTER
SLANDER & I,IBEL CALIF.
CIVI CODE
SI'CI'I'ON
43-44
Courtney
Gillespie &
Melody Gillespie
C/O:
PO Box,
P.O.
Box
8323;
Porterville,
Porterville, Californi
a
[
93257
|
RE,:
TO: Nicklas Hoffman &
Richard
Rodriguez
1831 N.
Lime
Street,
Tulare County,
California,
93257
;
[NEAR
PORTERVILLEI
Notice
&
Demand to
lletract
& Correct
DE,FAMATORY
S'[A'I-IIME
NT S
AGAI
N S'['
Courtney
& Melody Gillespie;
&
TO
CEASE,
&
DH,SIST
YOIJR
DE,ITAM{TION
OF
CIIARACTER
AT'IACKS AGAINS'I'
Courtney
& Melody Gillespie
Pursuant
to
CALIF. CIVIL
CODE
SECT.
$$
48a
TO:
Nicklas
Hoffman & Richard
Rodriguez
1831 N.
Lime
Street.
Tulare
Countv
California.
near
Porterville California
;
We have recently discovered in
June
12,,2015 the following
Defamatory
statements
madc by
you
in
the
world
wide web,
the
'internet'
published
& broadcast
on
youtube.com.;
We
are hereby
demanding that you immediately
&
forthwith
retract,
&
correct thc
falsc
defamatory matter cited &
quoted
below by
which
you
have
publiclv
defamed us, slandered
us,
Iibeled us, damaging
our
image,
character
reputation & standing
with
our
friends, in
the
Church,
the
community,
& among
our
piersl
If
you
fail
to do
so
we will
file
a Court
Action in
the
Tulare County Superior
Court
for damages
pursuant
to the
California
Law
on
Character Defamation,
Slander
& Libel, which
Law
is sot
out
here
below at the end of
this
Notice
and
Demand.
l. Nicklas
Hoffmun & Richard
Rodriguez,
vou
are lterebv
given
Notice
of
tlte Demands
of Courtney
& Melodv
Gillesnie,
nursuant
to Culi€ornia
Civil Cocle
Section
48s, that
vou
immediatelv
retract
&
conect
the
following
Defamatorv
false
ststements
which
are
highlighted
in
vellow,
which
vou
made in
tlte
following
broadcssts,
(l)
From
the YOUTUBE.COM
Video
titled
"Savc
our
family Ranch,
the
Story"
publishcd
on
July
13, 2014, the
inserted
description
of the video
oowe
are
going
to
lose our ranch
unless
we
pay
a
$
20,000
uniust Judgment bv
Oc
"
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 2/13
See m
o
re
at http :
//nicklas
arthur.wordpress.co
m/2
0
2.
"Hind
sight tells
me now that
this
is when I should have
pressed
them
and initiated eviction
if
they refused.I
could
have
saved
myself
years
of
anguish tens of thousands of
dollars
Richard,
well,
maybe,
but
I
could
never have
guessed
what
they
really had in
mind."
(10:56)
3.
ooWhen
they
did appear for
the
final
date, they feigned
that they were
still
interested
in
purchasing
the
West
half
of the
property.
Of
course
they
knew
there was
no
way
the
Church
was
going
to award
them half
of the
property
for
free on
a technicality. They did default
on the
Church Mediated
agreement."
(12:08)
Richard
Rodriguez,
his
partner
in
the
clip
then
asks
Hoffman:
o'What
did they
do
next?"
(12:10)
Hoffman
answers:
ooWell
myAhab
and Jczabcl
and I
call them
Ahab
and Jezabel here
because
it
takes
me
back
to that
biblical
story
where
Ahab
looked
over his
fence and saw his Neighbors vineyard and he wanted
it
for his own
garden
and his
neighbor
wouldn't
sell
it
to
him,
so
he
went crying
to his
wife
Jezabel,
now
they were
the King and
Queen
of
Israel, so Jezabel
said
don't
worry
about
it honey,
I
got
it
all
in
hand,
and
she
used
the law to convict
the owner
of the
property
of blasphemy
had
him
stoned
to
death,
and she
took
the
property
and
gave
it
to
her husband
Ahab
. But
fortunately,
my
Ahab
and Jezabel
aren't
king
and
queen
of
anything
,
ok
(laughing)
so,
I
don't
have to
worry
for
my life,
I
don't
think,
at
least
I
hope
not.
Um,
anyway, my
Ahab
and Jczabcl had
a
different
tactic
in mind
than
having
it
mediate
by
the
Church.
They would
take the
entire
property
from
us
by this technicality
of state
law,
in her
own
words
from
the
transcript
of
our
eviction
action the
California
law is very
clear on
that,
and the Civil
Code
is,
when
a
good
faith
payment
is
tendered and
rejected,
it
is a debt
forgiven, when
I tried
to refund their monep
and
canceled
the
note,
according
to
her
understanding
I
gave
them the
property,
and
I have
discovered
that that
was
their intent
the whole
time
they
stayed
on the
property,
because
the
property
and
family
because information from
our
property
and
family trust
files
that
I
kept
in
my
office and went missing
from my
office about
two
thousand six or seven, showcd
up
in
some of their
pleadings
and
there's
no other way
they could
have had
that
information unless
they
took
those
files.
But I
have
to admit,
I
was
totally
clueless, until
they
showcd
thcir
hostility."
(14:22)
4.
"When
I insisted
that the electrician
he
hired cease
and desist Mr. G assaulted
me
knocking
me
down in
the
gateway
and, and
when I tried to stand
back
up
he hit me
with
the
gate
again
knocking
me
down in
the
gravel
approach. I then called the
Sheriff
notified
him that
he
could
not
disconnect
my house from
the service.
His
workers, they
didn't
see anything,
and
Mr.
(i.
said I
swung at him
first.
So
as
far
as
an assault charge
it
was his
word
against mine.
Ilut
for
me
that
was the last
straw, Richard,
because the
church
mediation has
no cnforccmcnt
arm
I
then decided
to file an eviction
suit.
(15:44)
5. Richard
stated:
'oHow
did
that
eviction
go
?" Hoffman:
"
..".,.""
they
successfully
muddied the
waters
so
much
that
the Judge decided
to
deny
relief
on
a
technicalit5r,"..."
6.
"I
was no threat to them, contrarily
Mr. G
had
actually
assaulted
me."
7.
('They
now use the secured
possession
of the south
120 feet
of
my
property
as a launching
pad
from
which to
exdcute
their
plan
to
destrqy
me, my
family
and
my
livelihood in
order
to take
the
property
away
from
us.
Uh
their
plan
was to
have me
thrown in
jail,
on
gun
charges
then
move
into my
house, I'd
be
in
jail,I'd
get
out of
jail,
and
they'd
be
in my
house,
what
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 3/13
could
I do, I'd
have
to
try
to
go
at
law
to
get
'em,
but
I
would
be
destitute
because
all
mv work
is
here
on the
property,
and
you
know,I
need
my
equipment
and
my
and
for my internet
business.
I'd have
nothing
you
know
but
this
was
their
plan,
and they
told this
to a neighbor,
and
when the neighbor,
of
course they
put
it
in friendly terms,
what a scoundrel
I
was, and how
they had
a
right
to
do
these
things to
me,
when a
neighbor
asked them where
my family,
thev
coldly
replied
that they
can
live in
a motel,
so I'd
get
out
of
jailr
l'd be
in a
motel, my
children
would
be
in
foster
care, and
we would be
destitute,
with
nothing
on the street, nice
people
hu
?
When they
asked me
to take them in,
wow, thatrs heavy
."
(21235)
8.
Richard
Rodriguez
asks:
"So
what's
happened
during
the three
years
?"
Hoffman says:
*
Well in
the meantime
they
had
sabotaged my
phone
and DSL lines
finally
sevcring
thom
completely
then
they
destroyed
my
electric
service causing me
to
have
an almost one month
lapse
in service
this
in
an
attempt
to
destroy us
financially
so that
we
could
no longer
afford
to
fight
them
in
Court. They
\ilere
successful.
I lost all my syndicated
production
accounts
simply
because
I
could not
provide
reliable service.
And
how
this works,
is I
produced
radio
programs
on the
internet
and then
they
went out
to
Nation wide
to
short
wave and
AM
FM affiliates
and
I
got
all
the
advertising
when
I can no longer
provide
those accounts I didn't
get
the
advertising
anymore,
so
I
couldntt
still
air
the broadcast,
but
you
know,
so
when I lost
themo because
I
couldn't
provide reliable
service,
with
them
went
most
of my
earnings, oh, my
meager savings
were
exhausted
quickly
I notified my
Lawyer in January
of
2013 that I
could
no longer
afford
to
pay
him anything.
He
told
me
that he would finish
the
quiet
title
only, as
it
was
unlikely that
the
court would allow him
to drop the case anyway, ah, we
are now
surviving
on about
$1000
dollars
per
month in
donations
per programs
that
I don't
get
paid
for and don't have
national
syndication,
so
it's all donation
based.
Ah,
with
the
downturn in
the economy,
to
me it
seems
impossible
to
replace
the
accounts
I lost.o'
9. Richard
says:
"So
how
did
the
new
Judge
work out ?"
Hoffman says:
'6Well,
had
a history
with
him,
um,
if
we
go
back to
the
incident
where
they
cut off the
electricity because we
had mutual
restraining
Orders, he
had violated
the
restraining order
on several occasions.
Um,
we
iust
didn't
bother,like,
when
he
cut the phone lines,
finally
and
all
the
sabotage, we
can't
prove
these things,
you
know,
because
we had no witnesses, and ah, a
restraining
orders,
you
know,
contempt
of
court
on a
restraining
order is
quasi
criminal,
so the
burden
of
proof
is
absolute
you
have to
have
witnesses,
so we couldnrt
do
anything,
when he cut the
electricity ol'1,
the
circumstances
arose
where
he
would not allow
us, he
would not
leave
the
location
where
my
utilities
came into
the
property,
so
we
got
an emergency hearing,
you
know
you
can
get,
in a
day
or
so, before
this same
Judge, the new
Judge on the case, and he
denied us, uh, to
order
Mr.
Gillespie
to refrain from
interfering
getting
our
a,
restoring, allowing
us
to
restore,
our
electric
service
so
he
denied
that,
he
didn't
seem
to care
you
know,
that
me,
my
adult
retarded
son,
my
daughter,
and
a,
you
were here at that time,
you
came
to
the
property
just
a month
before that,
and
he
didn't
seem
to
mind
that
we
went
a
month
without
electricity because
we
told
him
that
it would
be
a
month or
more,
because
that's
what
SC was
telling
me
beforc
thcy
can schedule,
to retrench
the service,
400 feet down the
road
to
install
new
service,
in
front of
the
house,
then
connect us
up,
ok,
um,
so, anyway,
he
denied
that, so
that
was my
history with
that Judge."
10.
lloffman
stated:"'But
uh, nope, thatrs ngt
what
happened, um, he decided, this new
Judge
decidedo
balancing
the equities meant
that
I
would
pay
80
per
cent of
all electricity bills
incurred
by them for the
entire
ten
year
period,
they
would
get
15
thousand
for
work
they
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 4/13
never did
on
our
property,
which
supposedly
added value. Ah, they would only
pay
is 250
pcr
month
for rent,
but
we
would
get
nothing
for damages, legal
expenses, and
all
of
our
loses.
So
this
when it
was all balanced
out,
put
us
into
debt to them,
for
almost
twenty
thousand dollars,
here,
the decision,
was
that, my family,
we were the
iniured
party,
yet,
we had
to
pay
them
twenty
thousand
dollars,
for the
privilege
of being iniured
by them.
So
now
what could I
do?
So
now I have
ninety
days
to
come up
with
the
money,
before
they
begin
legal
action, to
force
sale of home,
in
order to
collect on
that, which I'm
sure they
will
do, because they have
filed
at
least
six
other law
suits against
me,
my lawyer,
other
family
members, and
even
business
associates
are named
as co-defendants in these law suits.'o
Richard
statcs:
"Sounds
like they
are
intent
on continuing
the campaign, and do
you
think
the
first
Judge
would
have
seen
things
differently
?
Nicklas:
"Ya,I
believe
the
first.Iudge would
havc
rcndcrcd
an
cntirely different
decision,
um, unfortunately,
you
know, they
wore him
out,
with I
think
fivc
recusals,
and
a,
and
for what
ever
reason
I
can't
blame
him for
not
wanting
to continuc
with
the case, I
didn't want to
continue,
you
know,
yes
I believe he
would
havc rcndcrcd an cntircly
different decision,
but
an appeal
would
mean more
years
in court, morc
in lcgal fccs,
than
thc
twenty
thousand
dollar
Judgment
against
us."
11..
Hoffman
stated:
"I
hope
we can
raise the money by
telling
people
our
story,
um, any extra
donations, we collect
will
go
to legal accounting
and
other
loses,
because
the
loses
havc already
been about
forty
thousand
in
actual out
of
loses, including
legal and
damages
that
wefve
incurred to this time,
and add to
that
the
twenfy
thousand
we have to
pay
themo thats
sixfy thousand dollars total loss, that was what they
wanted to steal
from
me
in
the beginning,
and so
they
have damaged
me
that
much,
but
they
still
want
the
property.
its amazing,
but
I
just
don't
understand
how
they
justiff
all
this in their
mind,
uh,
you
know this
is
the
short
version
of the story.
These
people
have
caused
so much
anguish and
distress
to all
of
us
if
you
can only
give
a
few
dollars,
please
help
us,I,
I
pray
that,
you
never have to, anyone out
there,
that
you
never have
to,
you
never have such
friends
in
your
life
that
could
betray
you
as
these
people
have
us,
if
anyone
wants
the long
version
perhaps
it
would
make
a
good
human
interest,
or a
terror movie
of a sort,
ah I have
some
good
ideas atrout
that
too, ah,
please
contact
us
for
further
details
and
proof,
and
thank you Richard
for
being
here
with
me.o'
(end
of first
youtube.com
clip)
FROM
THE 2nd YOUTUBE.COM
Ctip Titted:
'oSave
our Ranch update"
published
on
July
1612014
;
12.
Hoffman
states
at
4z16:
('In
the
by
and
by
he
offered
to
purchase
half the
property,
and we
had
a
written agreement
for
that,
and
he broke the agreement.
But
he decided to
set
me up
set up
circumstances
whereby
he
could
steal the
property
from us on a technicality.".."But
I
did
ask them in 2009
to
leave the
properfy,
and
thats when
they let
their hostilities
bc
known
against me and
my
family and
they've
done
everything they
could
to, ah,
destroy
me and my
family,
first
Amendment Radio.net
and
all
of my
work, in
order to,
ah,
you know cripple
us
financially,
so they could
have
their
way
with
us
in court,
so call
them
my Ahab
and Jezabel"
..."" So in the same way,
this man's
wife
,
because
she's
a legal
activist
and
you
know shc
does,
what a
you
call t]rat..
legal work"...."
"and
she
decided
that,
um, they could build
a case, even
if
they had
to build
it
from
scratch,
by
fqlsiffing
evidence
and
other
things,
which
they
did to set me up for, to
use a, um, what
you
call
it,
a technicality
of
lawn to steal
the
property
from me, and the
technicality of
law,
works
like
this"r..."" lf
someone sells
you
a
piece
of
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 5/13
property
and
you
begin
to
make
payments
on the
property
for a
year,
however if the
person
selling it
decides that
they
want
the
property
back, because the
railroads
coming
through,
right,
they realize,
oh,I
made
a
mistake,
the
railroads
coming
through, now this
property's
going
to be
worth
ten
times what it was,
so they
refuse
to
take
payments,
so they can
foreclose
on
you,
so that's what
the
technicality
is
in
the
law for,
so, she
thought
she
would fabricatc
evidence, in
order to
take
advantage of
this technicality
so
that they could
take the
property
from
me,
right,
and
that
would
be evil, if
someone
sold
you
a
piece
of
property
and they camc
back
after you
made
a
year or
ten years of payments on
it,
and refuse to
take
payments
o
because
then it
says,
if
they refuse
to take
payments,
then
that
means
that
the debt is
forgiven,
under that
circumstance,
rightt'
Richard
says:
t'thats
correct
"Nicklas
says:
"So
they
tried
to
fabricate
evidence
and
build
a case but
it
didn't work,
but they
dragged us
through
the
court
by
misusing
and abusing
court
procedure.,
and rules, ah
for
more
than, well it's
been
five
years
now. They
also misused
the court
and
procedures
to maintain
possession
of the
south
l2ll
fcet
of my
properfy
so that
they could launch
their campaign to destroy
me,
they've done a
lot
of
evil
things
to
me."
(17:08)
"These
are
some of the
things,
and worse
things
they've
done,
you
know,
cutting,
sabotaging
our internet
connection, and
phone
lines,
continually,
over
a couple
year
period,
finally severing
them
completely,
so that we were without
service,
almost
a
wcek
before the telephone
company
came
out
quickly
and
retrenched 600
feet
down the
road
to my
studio
here,
and replaced
my
lines, now
I
have
back
up
cable
internet
too,
so
I'm
very
secure
now,
in my
connection, and
a
keeping my
work
going.
They
also continually
messed
with
my
electricity, shutting it
off.
Because
my
services were
brought in at the corner
of the
property
closest to
where the
services
were and they
went underground
to my
house from
there
so
because
they
had
possession,
absolute
possession
of
that
portion given
to
them by
misusc
of the
court
system um,
they were able
to
harass
us
in that way
and sabotage, and then they
finally
uh, cut off our
electricity all
together,
about a month
after
you
arrived on
the
property."..".."
(22:40\
66I
spied a bucket
truck
out
there,
with electrician for
southern California
Edison
technician",
do
you
remember
what
he
said
?" Richard:
tt
He said
your power got
shut oI1,
discontinued"..
Nicklas
stated:
"
Yao
the
power got
discontinued, he shut
it
off because
of
non
payment
of the
power
bill,
because these
people
had taken over and had
possession
of my
property they
also
had control
thru
a
fictitious
entity
of the
electric
utilities
service
"
(12:34).
And they
thought
it also
made
their case look
better
because then
they could
get
reimbursed
and have
some kind
of
claim
against me.
"
(23:55)
13.
(32:20):
...".."he
breached
the contracto
but
then
came up with
a
technicality
whereby
they
were
going
to steal
the
property
from
me.
'o
(32:28)
"
Then they started
putting
together
,
constructing
false
evidence.
Q2234)
"We
filed
a
quiet
title which they knew
they
couldn't"
Nicklas asks
Richard Rodriguez:
"Am
I
a
liar
Richard",(etc) Richard
says:
"everything
hc
says
is
true"156Mr.
Gillespie had
demolished the
service
panel
and
SCE
wouldn't
hook it
up until
we
got
it cleared
by the County
and had a
permit
and
all that"
got
it
signed
off by
the county again,,"
'0..."..""
even
though it
would
cost us
$4000
dollars
and
take
over a
month to
get
our electricity
hooked back
up by trenching
400
feet down the
road."
"I
was
without
electricity
for
over three
weeks"
ttl
lost all my
production
accountstt
"the
computers
got
all
messed
up
because
of the bad
electricity
from the
generators"
..."
"two
generators
running continually"
forfy
dollars
worth
of
gas
a
day"..""
God
provided
three thousand
dollars
ten days
before the
power
went off'
(al:00)
So I
iust
held onto
it"..".."
we
did
have the funds
to
pay
for
the services
that
I already installe
d
and
paid
for,
to
hhve
them installed
again.".."and
having to face trumped up
gun
charges on
several occasions
"..
'obeing
watched continually"
"so
they
trumped
up this thing
where
I
shot
their friend
in
the eye,
and she
actually
swore
out
an
affidavit
saying
that this
actually
5
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 6/13
happened"ooand
you
know,
for
me
the
temptation
was
to retaliate in
kind, a, to
go
over thcre, and
murder
them,
and
things like
that,
you
know
cause
you
have
these
feelings.".."and
tempted to
fabricate
evidence,
or
whatever"...."
because I may
not
get
a
million
dollar multi million dollar
book
and
movie
deals
now
for
writing lies, I
certainly
canrt
get
it for
writing
the
truth,
but my
true reward
is beyond
what
any of
these
people
will ever
achieve, they
will lose
everything,
when
the
true resurrection
or their life
comes
to
an end
which ever comes
first."
(46:00-fQ
"They're
wise in
the ways of
evil
in
screwing
people
over,
inn
using
the
court
system"
"wise
evil
men rulc
the
world,
OK'
(a8:30-38).
From
YOUTUBE.COM Video
titled:
*PRTV
082714b"
published
August
28,2014,
from
Cross
theBoarder.org
14.
Nicklas Hoffman
states:
o'I
think
I've
got
like two
thousand
six
hundred dollars
raiscd on
linc
and then
offline I've
probably
raised a little more
than two thousand dollars."
15. From YOUTUBE.COM
Video
6'Ranch
Update
2"
published
on
August
2,2014,
at
33:20:
"It
adds
up
quickly
when
you
have people
that
iust
attack
and
attack,
I
mean,
you know
I
think
at least twelve
(12)
law suits, then they
attack
my
lawyer,
attack
my friend, attack
my
business associates,
cut
off
my
phone,
and
just
try
to destroy
thc work
that
I'm
doing
hcrc
becoming Satan's
puppets
that's
all they
are to
me is Satan's
puppets."
16.
"..""..so
I'm
going
to
give
what I have
on
that
date,
and then
they're
going
to
drag
mc
into
court for the rest of
it,
so I have
to
keep
paying
them
until
its
done."..."...
I think the
only
reason
they
asked
for
the
ninety
days
is
so
they
could
figure out a way to
stay
(45:20) I
mean,
I
think
their life
would be
over if they
couldn't
you
know carry out
Satan's
plan
to destroy me
and
my
family and the
work
that
I'm
doing
here. Actually, these
people
are
that
delusional
thnt
they
think
that
this
is
their
lifes
mission" Rodriguez
chimes in
("Ya"
IIoITman continucs:
"
They've
been
doing this
for
five years now and of
course
you know,
God
has
allowed them
to
come so far but
no
further,
well anyway
(45:43)
At
45247 Richard Rodriguez says:
"I
scc
thcl'
are
some
very delusional
people.
I
seen
their true
colors though,
yes
I
have." At 45:55
IlolTman
says
"Yes,
and
they
lie
at the
drop
of a
hat
man, therers
not
a
problem,
Rodriguez
chimes
in
"Quick"l
Hoffman
says:
"They
count,I
mean they, that's why,I'm
iust
amazed
at
the Judges
decision
but
see
the
Judge is
not
God
he's
probably
not
a
Godly
man,
if
any of the .Iudges
are
Free
Masons itrs
probably
that Judge"..."
he had to
put
them off the
property,
even
though
he
did favor
these
evil
people
by
giving
themo
you
know a Judgment that
they
weren't cntitled
to.'o Rodriguez
says:
66
Thats
Right";
Hoffman
says:
otHe
went
against
the evidence,
or
he
may
have
just
not liked
me,
or
the
way
I looked,
you
know,
it
poulda'
iust
come
down to
that,
ah, hc
could
just
trusted them
more
than
he
trusted
me,
or
because
they,
throw,
they slung
so
much
mud, that
some
of
it
stuck,
you know,
and
he
was
influenced by
the,
because he
probablv
thought by
the
volume
of
their
accusations
against
me
that
certainly
there
must
be some
truth
to it, ah
even though,
the
evidence
was
contrary,
because
you
know,
and
that's
the advantage
that
the
evil
have over
us, in the world,
is
that
they
are
allowed
to
bare
false witness
against
their neighbor, whereas we keep his commandments,
and it doesn't
matter
if
wc
hatc
our
neighbor or they're
trying
to destroy
us us, we still
can not repay
evil for evil,
because
if
I would
bare false witness against
them
and
start
making
false accusations
against
thcm that
would bc
repaying
evil for
evil, but it
gives
our
adversaries
an advantage
in
the systoms
of
mcn,
but nol
(;
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 7/13
before the
Judge and the court that really
matters,
the cloud of witnesses
that
ovcrsccs
us all,
and the real court, and
the real trial
that
I should say,
that's
going
on daily
and
is
bcing
plaved
out
in all our
lives,
because we're all
on trial
for our whole
lives, and
that's anothcr
thing that
I've been realizing
going
through
this court system thing,
is
that
we
are
in
trial evcryday
and
there are a
cloud
of witnessesrwe have a
Jury,
only,
there's only
this one that's
going
to
makc
a
decision,
and
that
is
the
great
King Judge
of us
all,
and
that
is
Jeshua,
Jcsus.
ltichard
Rodriguez
states: I
know there's
going
to be a
lot of work
to
be done over
there,
thcy.iust,
thcv
thrashed
that
place". Nicklas
says:
"ya.
Richard
says:
"
You
know
what
I
mean,
clearly.
.f
unk
everywheret'
Nicklas
says:
'o
lt's a mess, but that's
the least of
our
problems."
Richard
says:
"
Yar I
know".."
Nicklas
states:
'6
But I
don't
want
to
be tied
to these
people,
I'd
rathcr
cut'em
Ioose
as soon as
possible,
because they need to
go
on
with
their
life,
and
dcal
with thc
rcal
problems
that they
have because Satan's. had
control
over
them
for so
long, that, a,
I'm
surc
that
a
lot
of
that
is
being
played
out
in
their
flcsh,
you
know,
physical problems
and so
f'orth,
and their own family's
going
to hell in a hand basket,
I
can
see
it,
but
they can't,
bccausc
thcy
can't
even see
the road they're
on" Richard says
"Post
this on
your
face book,
sharc
it,
we
nccd
to
get
as
many
shares
as
we can,
you
know it's not share'n
as
much,
but
sharc
this, uho
youcaring.com
save
the
ranch,
then
Nicklas
states,
o'OK
I'll
put
the
link
in
thcro oncc
again
and
paste
it
and
then we
go
send,
and
it's
in
there
once
again,
so
ya,
please,
uh, do
it
thrce or
four
times
during
the week.
Ok that's
all
we have
time for,
I'm
Nicklas
Arthur,
with
Richard,
signing off.
FROM YOUTUBE.COM
Video
titled:
"RANCH
UPDATE
2
Published
August
2,2014,
at 33:55:
17.
Nicklas Hoffman
states:
o'Anyway
speaking
of
miracles"..."If these
people repented and
withdrew
their complaints
and
withdrew
the
lien
against
our
ranch, that
would
bc a miraclc,
O.K"..."that
would be the best miracle of a11"..."
if they repent
theytre
not my
enemy any
more.o'
That's
right
if
they
repent
of the
evil they've
done,
and truly repent
turn
their
lives
around
and said
we
were led
astray
ah,
whatever,
that would
be
probably
the
best
miracle
so
perhaps
all
of
you
can,
when
you're praying
for
me and
my ranch,
and God
to smitetem,
father,
so we
would like to see
them
repent,
that
would be the best thing of
all,
because
at
one
time they
at least,
pretended
to be
my friends
you
know, I
knew they
pretended
for
a long
time, while
they were
making
other
plans
(36:18)
At
38:38
Nicklas
stated
"They
made
false
accusations
against
me
and
then when
I
went
into
it,
it
was
the
same
Judge
that took
over the
case during
the last ten
percent
and
turned
thc
wholc
thing around, and awarded
the restraining order,
in California
if
you get
a
restraining Order
you
lose
your
second amendment
gun
Rights,
you
have none, and
thats why they
went
about
to
build
gun
charges
against
me,
because they
knew
I
had
formerly at
one
time
had
a
twenty two
caliber
rifle,
that
I
was supposed
to have had and then
see my
posse$sion would bring
in Federal
gun
charges"..."
and I
would definitely
go
to
jail,
and
that
was what
they
were
trying
to
construct
against
me on
the gun charges
they
didn't just
try
once,
they
tried
twice,
and they
failed
twicc."
18. Iloffman
said:
*They
said I shot
not
with
a bee
bee
gun,
but
with
a
high
powered
pellct
gun,
Brent
Wade,
that
belonged
to
you,
that
you
had on, that
I
wouldn't
allow
you
to
have on
my
ranch
so
you pu
it
on consignment.
So
they constructed
a
story
of me
using
that
pcllet
rifle
and
shooting a
womhn
in
the
face
with
it. T\ey
actually
got
a
woman to
sign
a
complaint
and
lie,
saying
that
it
actually
happened,
but it
never happened.
Just
look at what
they
did
with
the
quiet
title
putting
it
off
for
four
years,
so this
is the
diabolical
plan
that these
people
tried
to
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 8/13
execute
against me, and
why
it
took so long not to mention
using
RICO
statutes." Thev tricd
numerous
times
to
get
the
County
Prosecutor
to
come
after
me,
and the City
Prosecutor, of the
local
town
to come
after
me, and the
City
prosecutor,
of the
local town to
come
after
mc, thcy
had
priorities
because
they
couldn't
keep
their
story
straight and
you
know,
and they
had
no
evidence
that
I
was
involved in
any
criminal activity,
I
mean, because
I don't have
any
priors,
I'vc
never
been
arrested
in
my life,
never been
charged
with
a
crime kind
of
difficult
to
go
from
there, to
get
me
as
the
God
father of
racketeering, as the
Godfather
of
Tulare
County.
I
don't
think
the
County
Prosecutor was
buying
it
,
so
these
are the
kind
of attacks,
I'm
iust
glad
that
Satan was using these
weaker
people
against
me,
didn't
have
any
big timc Jesuit,
you
know
coming
after
me,
like they did after
Tony
Alamo
and
others"...".."
From
the
YOUTUBE.COM
video
title
*TEMPLE
MOUNT
Maybe
Wrong
Location"
Feb. 11,2015
19. at
39:29
Nicklas
Hoffman
states:
"But
then they
hired a lawyer
for a day
to cxaminc
mc,
this
guys
kind
of
like
a bull dog,
OK,
and
a
apparently
I know more
than their
bulldog
knows,
because
I
knew
that
he
couldn't
ask me
personal
questions"
at 39:55
Nicklas
says:
"Ilut
their
Lawyer
has
little
honor
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
he's
just
a
paid bulldog,
for
thc
day, bccausc
they
like
to
be
their own attorney,
so anyway
I
hope he
got'em
real
good
on
fees,
ya".
(40:15).
20. Hoffman
says:
"another
thing
I found out,
you
know
how Paypal,
shut
us
down, and
I
had
to
refund all
of the
help,
the
funds
that
people
were,
giving,
um I found
out
that,
they
complainedo
because their
lawyer
brought
up
the
page
in
the
conference
room
there
when they were
grilling
me and when I told
them,
cause
he
says
well where
is this
money
at, and I
told
him that
it
got
shut
down
and I had
to refund all
those funds, and
immediately
I know by
looking
at
their
face, uh, faces, that they
had
complained,
and had
the
thing shut
down,
didn't
quitc
put
it
together before that,
yao
it
was cause they accepted
that
immediately without
question,
they
already knew
it,
that's what
I discovered and
that they were
responsible
fbr
shutting
down
thc
go
fund
me
thing
that
we
had
going there at,
like
I
said
I
had
to refund
most of
those,
all
of the
ones that
came
from
pay
pal,
I
had
to
refund,
and I
don't think
I've
got, got
a few of
those
back
so
I do have a
little
bit
of
money
a
couple
thousand
dollars
put
up
for this, that
people
gave
itrs
still sitting there but its nol
gonna
be
enough
,
so as
soon as this
thing
is done
we'll
see
whatrs
left
and
hopefully
werll
get
a Judgment
against
them
but
its unlikely
like I
said the
Judge
seems very
biased
but
if he
does
his
true
job,
I
think
that
I have damages
coming against
them,
that
we
couldn't
get
the
Quiet
Title Equity
thing"..."it
doesn't mean
I
wouldn't rathcr
have been before the other
Judge,
which
they recused 3
or 4 timcs, to stall,
and
that.ludge
finally
died,
that's
one
of the
reasons he became,
he had terminal canccr
and
hc dicd, and
so
this the
new
judge
also
the
head Judge, of the
whole coutrt
house,
picked
up thc
casc evcn
though
the
original
Judge
had
found
us to
be
the
injured
party,
some
how they
got rcwardcd
for
injuring
us,
and now we
have
to
pay them doesn't make
sense,
but
when
you
undcrstand,
that
their effort
to fragment the
case by
the
recusals
and
delays,
and finally
getting anothcr
Judge,
which
was
what
they
hoped fon
but he
had
to
die
because
the
rccusals didn't
work,
and
uh
it
fractured
the case, so
much
that,
ya,
they
were
able to
get
something
with
the
new
Judge
that
the
other
the
original
Judge
would
ncver have
given
them,
cause
hc
alrcady
statcd
that they had
nb
right
to those things
under
the
contract
that
was
in disputc."...
21. June
17r2015 on
Prophecy Realify
program
on
http://firstamendmcntradio.nct
starting
at
tl
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 9/13
16:09, Nicklas Hoffman
stated:
"I
have been
under attack for
seven
years,
oh
yes
and
I havc
to
admit,
I
got
to the
root
of
this
attack
and
it's from
those
evil
people
that
tried
to steal
my land and
destroy
me
and
they began
the
whole thing
by
enraging
other
people.
. .
it all startcd
with
going
to
the
party
and I should have
hidden
the horses
that
were in bad shape,
anyway
it
all startcd
with
the same
people
and
their
agenda
to
destroy
me and
my family and
the
work
that wc
arc
doing
here
at
any
cost
regardless
. .
.
2102:
Nicklas
Hoffman continues:
"who
do I
think
she
was
working
for?
No, I
think
she had
her
own
agenda.
The
woman they
sicced
on
me,
of
course
the they
that
sicced
hcr
on
me is
thc
cabal,
this
small cabal of
people
that
are still
attacking
me over
here. They called
the
. .
.of
course
she ha
a
horse
rescue
ranch in Tulare, not in Tulare,
Exeter
California
and she
is a liar, and she's
willing
to
bare
false
witness against
me,
so
that's the
worse
kind
of
liar,
'cause
thc commandmcnt
specifically
says
'Thou
shalt not
bear false witness
against thy
neighbor
and
she
had no
compunction about bearing
false witness
against me, and
anyway, she
workcd
lbr hcrsclf,
and
it
was a
good
event
for her
to
raise funds.
CALIFORNIA
LAW OI{ DEFAMATIOI{
OF
CHARACTER\
SLANDE,R &
LIBELCIVI
CODE SECTIOI\
43-53.7
43. Besides the
personal
rights
mentioned
or
recognized
in
the
Government
Code,
every
person
has, subiect
to the
qualifications
and
restrictions
provided
by
law,
the
right of
protection
from bodily
restraint
or
harm, from
personal
insult,
from defamation,
and
from
iniury
to
his
personal relations.
44.
Defamation
is
effected
by either
of the
following:
(a)
Libel.
(b)
Slander.
45.
Libel
is
a
false and
unprivileged
publication
by
writing,
printing,
picture,
effigy,
or othcr
fixed
representation to
the
eye, which
exposes
any
person
to
hatred, contcmpt,
ridiculc, or
obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or
avoided, or
which
has a tendcncy
to
in.iurc
him
in
his
occupation.
45a.
A
libel which
is
defamatory
of the
plaintiff
without the
necessity
of
explanatory matter,
such as
an inducement,
innuendo or
other extrinsic
fact, is
said to be a
libel on its face.
Defamatory
language
not libelous
on
its
face is
not
actionable unless
the
plaintiff
alleges and
proves
that he has suffered
special
damdge
as
a
proximate
result thereof.
Special
damage
is defined
in
Section
48a
of
this
code.
46. Slander
is
a
false and unprivileged
publication, orally
uttered,
and also
communications
by radio or
any
mechanical
or
othcr
mcans
which:
l. Charges any
person
with
crime,
or with
having
been
indicted,
convicted,
or
punished
for
crime;
2. Imputes in him the
present
existence
of an infectious,
q
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 10/13
contagious,
or
loathsome
disease;
3.
Tends
directly to
injure
him in respect
to his office,
profession,
trade or
business,
either by
imputing to him
general
disqualification
in
those respects
which
the office
or
other
occupation
peculiarly
requires,
or by
imputing
something
with
reference
to
his office,
profession,
trade, or business
that
has
a
natural
tendency
to
lessen
its
profits;
4.
Imputes
to
him
impotence
or
a
want
of
chastity;
or
5. Which, by natural consequence, causes
actual damage.
47. A
privileged publication
or broadcast is one
made:
(a)
In the
proper
discharge
of
an
official
duty.
(b)
In any
(1) legislative
proceeding,
(2)
judicial
proceeding,
(3)
in
any
other
official
proceeding
authorized by
law,
or
(4)
in
the
initiation or
course of any
other
proceeding
authorized
by law and
reviewable
pursuant
to Chapter
2
(commencing
with
Section
1084)
of
'I'itle
I of
Part
3 of
the
Code
of
Civil
Procedure,
except
as follows:
(1)
An allegation
or averment
contained
in any
pleading or
affidavit filed in
an
action
for
marital
dissolution or
legal
separation
made of or
concerning
a
person
by or
against
whom
no
affirmative
relief
is
prayed
in
the
action shall
not be
a
privileged
publication
or
broadcast
as to
the
person
making
the
allegation
or
averment
within the
meaning
of
this
section
unless
the
pleading
is
verified or affidavit
sworn to,
and
is made
without
malice,
by
one
having
reasonable and
probable
cause for believing
the
truth of
the
allegation
or averment
and unless the
allegation or
avermcnt
is
material
and
relevant to the
issues
in
the action.
(2)
This subdivision does not
make
privileged
any
communication
made in
furtherance
of an act of
intentional destruction
or
alteration
of
physical
evidence
undertaken
for
the purpose
of
depriving a
party
to litigation
of the
use of
that
evidence,
whether
or
not
the content of the
communication
is the subject
of
a
subsequent
publication
or
broadcast
which
is
privileged
pursuant
to
this
section. As used
in this
paragraph,
"physical
evidence"
means
cvidence
specified
in
Section
250
of the
Evidence Code
or
evidence
that is
property
of any type
specified
in Chapter 14
(commencing
with
Section 2031.010) of
Title
4
of
Part
4 of the Code of
Civil
Procedure.
(3)
This subdivision does not
make
privileged
any
communication
made in a
iudicial
proceeding
knowingly
concealing
thc
existence
of
an insurance
policy
or
policies.
(4)
A recorded
lis
pendens is
not
a
privileged publication
unless
it
identifies
an
action
previously
filed
with
a court
of
competent
jurisdiction
which
affects the
title
or
right of
possession
of
real
property,
as
authorized or
required by
law.
(c)
In
a communication,
without
malice, to
a
person intercsted
therein,
(1)
by one who is also
interested,
or
(2)
by
one
who
stands
in
such a
relation to the
person
interested
ai
to afford
a reasonable
ground
for
supposing
the motive
for the
communication
to be
10
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 11/13
innocent,
or
(3)
who is requested
by
the
person
interested
to
give
the
information.
This
subdivision
applies
to and
includes
a
communication
concerning
the
job
performance
or
qualifications
of an
applicant for
employment, based upon credible evidence, made
without
malice, by
a current
or
former
employer of the
applicant
to, and upon
request
of, one
whom
the
employer
reasonably
believes
is
a
prospective
employer
of the
applicant. This subdivision
authorizes
a
current
or
former
employer,
or the employer's
agent,
to
answer
whether
or not
the employer
would rehire
a
current or former
employee.
This subdivision
shall not apply
to
a communication
concerning
the speech or activities
of an
applicant
for
employment
if
the
speech
or activities
are
constitutionally
protected,
or
otherwise
protected
by
Section
527.3
of the Code
of Civil
Proccdurc
or any other
provision
of law.
(d)
(1)
By
a
fair
and true report in,
or
a
communication
to,
a
public
journal,
of
(A)
a
judicial,
(B)
legislative,
or
(C)
other
public
official
proceeding,
or
(D)
of anything said
in
the course
thereof,
or
(E)
of
a verified charge
or complaint
made
by
any
person
to
a
public official,
upon
which
complaint
a
warrant
has been issued.
(2)
Nothing in
paragraph
(1)
shall
make
privileged
any
communication
to a
public
journal
that does
any of
the
following:
(A)
Violates
Rule
5-120 of
the
State
Bar Rules of
Professional
Conduct.
(B)
Breaches
a
court
order.
(C)
Violates any
requirement
of
confidentiality
imposed
by
law.
(e)
By a
fair and
true report
of
(1)
the
proceedings
of
a
public
meeting,
if
the
meeting was lawfully
convened
for a lawful
purpose
and open to
the
public,
or
(2)
the
publication
of the
matter
complained
of was
for
the
public
benefit.
48.
In
the
case
provided
for in
subdivision
(c) of
Section
47,
malice is not
inferred from
the
communication.
48a. 1.
In any
action for damages for
the
publication
of a libel in
a
newspaper,
or
of
a
slander by radio
broadcast,
plaintiff
shall
recover no
more
than
special damages unless
a correction
be demanded
and be
not
published
or
broadcasto
as hereinafter
provided.
Plaintiff
shall
serve upon
the
publisher,
at the
place
of
publication
or
broadcaster
at the
place
of
broadcast,
a
written
notice
speciffing
the
statements claimed
to
be
libelous
and demanding
that
thg same be
corrected. Said
notice
and demand
must
be served
within
20 days
after
knowledge of the
publication
or
broadcast of the statements claimed
to be
libelous.
2. If a correction be
demanded within said
period
and bc
not
published
or
broadcast
in
substantially
as conspicuous
a
manner in
said
newspaper
or
on said
broadcasting station
as were
the
statements
claimed
to
be
libeloirs,
in a regular issue thereof
published
or
broadcast
within
three weeks
after
such service,
plaintiff,
if he
pleads
and
proves
such
notice,
demand and
failure
to correct,
and if
1.1
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 12/13
his
cause
of action
be maintained, may recover
general,
special
and
exemplary
damages;
provided
that
no
exemplary
damages
may
be
recovered
unless the
plaintiff
shall
prove
that
defendant
made the
publication
or broadcast
with actual
malice and then only
in
the
discretion
of the
court or
jury,
and
actual
malice shall
not
be
inferred or
presumed
from
the
publication
or
broadcast.
3.
A
correction
published
or
broadcast in
substantially
as
conspicuous
a
manner
in
said newspaper
or
on said
broadcasting
station as
the statements
claimed
in
the
complaint
to he libelous,
prior
to
receipt
of
a
demand therefor, shall
be
of the
same forcc
and
effect as though
such
correction
had been
published
or
broadcast
within
three
weeks
after
a demand
therefor.
.
4.
As used herein,
the
terms
"general
damagesr"
"special
damagesr"
"exemplary
damages" and
"actual
malicer" are defined as
follows:
(a)
"General
damages"
are
damages
for loss of
reputation,
shame,
mortification
and
hurt
feelings;
(b)
"Special
damages" are
all
damages
which
plaintiff
alleges
and
proves
that he
has
suffered in
respect
to his
property,
business,
trade,
profession
or occupation,
including
such
amounts of money
as
the
plaintiff
alleges and
proves
he has expended as
a
result
of the
alleged
libel,
and
no
otherl
(c)
"Exemplary
damages" are damages
which
may
in
the
discretion of
the
court
orjury
be recovered in
addition to
general
and special
damages for
the
sake of
example and by
way
of
punishing
a defendant
who has made the
publication
or
broadcast
with
actual
malice;
(d)
"Actual
malice"
is
that
state
of mind arising
from
hatrcd
or
ill will
toward
the
plaintiff; provided,
however,
that
such a state
of
mind
occasioned by a
good
faith
belief on the
part
of the
defendant
in
the truth
of the
libelous
publication
or
broadcast
at
the
time
it
is
published or
broadcast
shall not
constitute
actual
malice.
48.5.
(1)
The owner, licensee
or operator
of
a
visual
or
sound
radio broadcasting station
or network of
stations,
and the agents
or
cmployees
of any such owner,
licensee
or operatorrshall
not be
liable for
any damages for
any
defamatory
statement
or
matter
published
or uttered
in or
as a
part
of a
visual or
sound
radio
broadcast
by
one
other
than
such owner,
licensee
or
operator,
or
agent or
employee thereof,
if
it
shall
be
alleged and
proved
by
such
owner,
licensee
or
operator,
or
agent
or
employee
thereof,
that such
owner,
licensee
or operator, or
such agent
or
employee,
has
exercised
due care
to
prevent
the
publication
or utterance
of such
statement
or matter in
such broadcast.
(2)lt
any
defamatory
statement
or matter
is
published
or
uttered
in or as a
part
of
a broadcast
over the
facilities
of
a
network
of
visual or
sound
radio
broadcasting
stations,
the owner,
licensee or
operator
of any such
station, or network
of
'stations,
and
the agents
or
employees
thereof, other
than
the owner, licensee
or opcrator of
the station, or
nefwork
of stations, originating such
broadcast, and
12
7/18/2019 Letter To Nicklas Hoffman, Richard Rodriquez
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-nicklas-hoffman-richard-rodriquez 13/13
the
agents
or
employees
thereof,
shall in
no event be liablc
for
any
damages
for
any such
defamatory
statement
or
matter.
(3)
In no
event, howcver,
shall
any owner, licensce
or
operator
of
such
station
or network
of
stations,
or the agents or employces
thereof,
be
liable
for any
damages for any
defamatory
statement
or
matter
published
or uttered,
by
one
other than
such
owner, licensee
or
operator,
or
agent
or
employee thereof,
in
or as a
part
of
a
visual or
sound
radio
broadcast
by or
on
behalfofany
candidate
for
public
office,
which
broadcast
cannot be censored
by
reason of the
provisions
of federal
statute
or
regulation
of the Federal
Communications
Commission.
(a)As
used
in this
Part 2rthe
terms
"radior"
"radio
broadcast,"
and
"broadcastr"
are
defined
to include
both visual
and sound
radio
broadcasting.
(5)
Nothing
in
this
section
contained
shall deprive
any such
owner,
licensee
or
operator,
or
the agent
or
employee
thereof,
of any
rights
under any
other
section of
this Pnrt
2.
Dated
.Iune
18,
20Ls
Melody
illesp
spre
j
G
1:l