Upload
markingsoncase
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Letter to HHS Civil Rights About Possible HIPAA Violations
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-hhs-civil-rights-about-possible-hipaa-violations 1/2
Center for Bioethics N504 Boynton
410 Church Street
Minneapolis MN 55455
612-624-9440
Fax: 612-624-9108
www.bioethics.umn.edu
Susan McAndrew, J.D.
HHS Office for Civil Rights
200 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20201
Phone: 202-260-3314
E-mail: [email protected]
March 9, 2013
Dear Ms. McAndrew:
In the fall of 2012, I wrote to the HHS Office of the Inspector General requesting an
investigation of research oversight at the University of Minnesota, with special reference to the
suicide of Dan Markingson in a study titled ““Comparison of Atypicals in First Episode
Psychosis” (NCT00034892). One part of my request concerned possible HIPAA violations. In a
letter dated December 7, 2012, Ms. Jennifer Trussell informed me that this part of my requesthad been forwarded to you. I have received no acknowledgement of receipt from your office,
however.
My reason for writing now is to inform you of a new issue involving the possibility of further
HIPAA violations. As I wrote in my initial request to the HHS Office of the Inspector General,
the medical files for Dan Markingson, who died in the CAFÉ study in 2004, did not contain a
signed HIPAA authorization. When the mother of Mr. Markingson filed a lawsuit against the
university, the university was unable to produce a signed authorization. However, in 2011,
when a family friend of Mr. Markingson filed a complaint with the university, it produced asigned HIPAA authorization, but was unable to say where it had come from, or why it had not
been a part of Mr. Markingson’s medical files.
More recently, I received an unsigned HIPAA authorization from the family of a second subject
in the CAFÉ study. (I have posted that form here.) The absence of a signature on this form
7/29/2019 Letter to HHS Civil Rights About Possible HIPAA Violations
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-to-hhs-civil-rights-about-possible-hipaa-violations 2/2
suggests that the private health information of this subject may have been provided to the
CAFÉ study sponsors (AstraZeneca and Quintiles) without the consent of the research subject.
Another odd feature appears on the form: a sentence that reads “This authorization does not
have an expiration date.” My understanding of HIPAA requirements is that authorization forms
must specify an expiration date or event. According to the website of your office, all HIPAAauthorizations must “contain either an expiration date or an expiration event that relates to the
individual or the purpose of the use or disclosure.”
At a minimum, a single unsigned form suggests a HIPAA violation. Of course, it is possible that
there is another signed form somewhere, but it has not been provided to this family. The
absence of a signature also raises broader questions, of course. Did the other subjects in the
CAFÉ study authorize the release of their health information, or were their HIPAA forms left
unsigned as well?
The absence of an expiration date suggests a more systemic problem. If the HIPAA forms for
two subjects in the CAFÉ study contain the sentence “This authorization does not have an
expiration date,” it seems possible that all of the HIPAA forms did. And if that is true, then it is
possible that the privacy rights of all 17 of the CAFÉ study subjects were violated, and possibly
subjects in other Department of Psychiatry studies as well.
I hope that you will consider my request seriously. I would be glad to provide you with any of
the documents that I have, if they would be useful.
I would be grateful if you would let me know when you have received this letter.
Yours sincerely,
Carl Elliott MD PhDProfessor, Center for Bioethics