42
Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Lesson 7

Mid Cervical Spine

Assessment and Treatment

Page 2: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Arthrokinematics

Sidebend /rotation

U joints/ Z jts

ipsi inf, med, post

( IMP)

contra sup,ant, lat

( SAL)

Rotation / Side Bend

Page 3: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Segment ROM

Mean Range

C3-4 6.5 3-10

C4-5 6.8 2-12

C5-6 6.9 0-12

C6-7 2.1 2-10

C7-T1 2.1 -2-7

Mean Values and ranges of axial rotation of cervical motion segments CT scanning Penning , Wilmink 87

Page 4: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Normal ROM in axial rotation and coupled motion – biplanar radiography Mimura’89

Segment Axial rotation SD

Flex/ext

SD

Lateral flexion SD

C3-4 6 ( 5) -3( 5) 6( 7)

C4-5 4 (6) -2( 4) 6( 7)

C5-6 5( 4) 2(3) 4( 8)

C6-7 6(3) 3( 3) 3( 7)

Page 5: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Objective Assessment

• Active ROM – upper vs mid cervical

• Repeated Movement

• Habitual and Combined Movements

Page 6: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Joint Play Movements

• Central PA C3-7 – what does it tell you?

• Central Angle Caudally – what movement ?

• Unilateral PA 3-7 – incline cranially and caudally

Page 7: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Passive Segmental Tests

PPIVMS• Used to determine the amount and quality of

passive physiological movement available at a motion segment

• Flexion, Extension, Side bending/rotation

( unilateral flexion and extension)

Page 8: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Segmental Compliance Test

• Assess the connective tissue compliance of the arthrokinematic motions ( rocks and slides) associated with various physiological movements of the segment

• Clinician is attempting to appreciate the quality of the “ give” present in the CT when the segment is at R2

Page 9: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

NDI Measurement Properties

Coefficients• Internal consistency =.87

• Test-retest reliability (several days) .89 to .94

• Correlates with SF-36 Physical Component Score r=.53; Pain intensity r=.56; Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) score r=.80

Page 10: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

NDI Measurement Properties

Scale Points• Variation in a single score value ±3 (90% CI)

• Minimal detectable change 5 points

• Minimal clinically important difference 5 points

Page 11: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Neck Disability Index (NDI)(Vernon & Mior 1991)

10 item self-report functional status measure

Items scored on a 6 point scale (0 to 5)

Total score value 0 (high function) to 50 (low)

About 3 to 5 minutes for patient to complete

20 seconds to score without computational aids

Page 12: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Objective Assessment

Segmental Integrity Tests

• Evaluate the ability of motion segment’s passive elements to resist uni-planar forces

• Test passive subsystem ( ligaments of knee)

Page 13: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

NZ / EZ Relationship

Boundary between R 1 and R2

NZ

EZ

Page 14: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Stability Tests

Page 15: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Treatment

• Mobilization – traction, IMP

• Exercise

• Education

Page 16: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Tractionneutral and restriction

Page 17: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Strategies for Stabilization

Page 18: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Instability• Loss of the ability of the spine to maintain

relationships between vertebrae in such away to prevent:

» spinal cord or nerve root damage» incapacitating deformity» severe pain (Panjabi, 1990)

• Often defined as an increase in a particularmeasure (eg: ADI>3mm)

Page 19: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Neutral Zone (Panjabi, 1989)

• That part of the ROM

which requires very little force to produce minimal resistance to the movement

Page 20: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Stability

Control

system

Passive

system

Active system

Panjabi 1992

Psycho Social

Page 21: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Efficient Movement = Optimal Stabilization

Requirements

Intact bones, joints, ligaments

Efficient and coordinated muscle action

Appropriate neural responses

Page 22: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Learning to control the Deep and Postural muscles

Edgepac Queensland Aust ‘99

Page 23: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Scapular muscle control

Poor postural position of the scapula

Balanced force couple around the scapula

Page 24: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Muscle impairments of the axioscapular muscles

• Loss of holding capacity in any of the upper, mid, + lower portions of trapezius

• Loss of holding capacity of serratus anterior

Page 25: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Imbalance of large posterior muscles and deep anterior muscles

Page 26: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Muscles impairments in cervical pain syndromes

• Poor activation and holding capacity of deep neck flexors

• Overactivity of the superficial muscles that span cervical spine

Page 27: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Deep

stabilizing

muscles of the

neck

SCMSCM

Page 28: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Muscle impairments of the axioscapular muscles

• Overactivity of levator scapulae, pectoralis major or minor , scalenes

• Overactivity of upper traps in response to sensitive neural tissues

Page 29: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Stabilizing Muscles of the Scapula

Page 30: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Cervical Pain syndromes

• Superficial muscles attempt to stabilize the neck but anatomically not designed for segmental support

• Decreased capacity for co contraction of deep neck flexors and extensors to increase segmental stiffness

Page 31: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Cervical Pain Syndromes

• Poor pattern of superficial and deep neck flexor synergy in sagittal plane movements

• Often poor postural position of neck and girdles

• Tightness suboccipital extensors

Page 32: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Suboccipitals become tight

Stretching often contraindicated

Neural tissue must be respected

Page 33: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment
Page 34: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Head and neck in mid range neutral position, face parallel to the ceiling. May add towels

Avoid craniovertebral extension

Page 35: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Stabilizer is placed behind the neck suboccipitally

Stabilizer is inflated to fill the suboccipital space (approx 20mmHG)

Longus colli activation

Page 36: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Motor Control is NOT a birthright

Page 37: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Treatment Advice

• No phasic ,erratic movement

• Emphasis on precision and control

• Discourage activity of superficial neck

flexors

Page 38: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Treatment Advice

• Train joint position sense

• Perform exercises at least twice a day

• Exercise must be pain free

• Deep muscle function does not return automatically

Page 39: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Components of an Effective Exercise Program

• Cardiovascular Endurance

• Muscle strength, endurance and co-ordination

• Flexibility

• Body Composition

Page 40: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Motor Learning

• Formal motor skill training

• Perception of the specific contraction

• Understand the task, what it feels like, instructions, visual cues, different postures/positions, various facilitation and feedback

• Enhance the patients perception of the deep muscle motor skill

• Focus on one particular muscle at a time

Page 41: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Motor Learning

Associative Stage Automatic Stage • “Got the idea” practice thousands of repetitions

• Care with fatigue 

Page 42: Lesson 7 Mid Cervical Spine Assessment and Treatment

Motor LearningExercise Progression • Commence co-activation of TA/multifidus

• Combine with short neck flexors

• Increase holding time

• Increase number of contractions

• Reduce feedback

• Add diaphragmatic breathing (abdominal wall movement while maintaining a deep muscle contraction) Intermediate steps to encourage air flow: counting, talking