Upload
lehanh
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LES of mixing in a jet mixer and combustion in a premixed swirling
free jet
OpenFOAM applications at the University of Rostock
Hannes Kröger
http://www.ltt-rostock.de/http://www.argo-group.de/
Outline● Introduction● Mixing Project
– SGS model implementations– Validation– Jet mixer simulations– Future work: inflow generator
● CIVB Project– Scope– Preliminary computations
Introduction: Institute for Technical Thermodynamics
LeadershipProf. Egon Hassel
Research groups● Numerical Thermodynamics● Experimental Thermodynamics● Thermodynamics of Engines
Employees● 15 scientists ● 3 OpenFOAM users
Outline● Introduction● Mixing Project
– SGS model implementations– Validation– Jet mixer simulations– Future work: inflow generator
● CIVB Project– Scope– Preliminary computations
SGS-Model implementation
Motivation● Change from Inhouse Fortran Code for LES to
OpenFOAM in progress● Best results in past simulations with DMM model● Some disadvantages in OpenFOAM:
– dynamic constant is averaged over entire domain and uniform everywhere
– Dynamic procedure in “dynamicMixedSmagorinsky” does not take Leonard stresses into account
“dynSmagorinsky” and “dynMixedSmagorinsky” were modified
Changes in “dynSmagorinsky”ij−
13kkij=−2C s2∣S∣ S ij
M ij= 2∣S∣ S ij−2∣S∣ S ijLij=ui u j− ui u j
C=C s2=−1
2 ⟨ LijM ij
⟨M klM kl ⟩ ⟩Present OpenFOAM implementation:
modified:
C=C s2=−1
2LijM ij
M klM kl
Constant is uniform – non-local in space
Constant varies in space
To ensure stability: clipping of backscatter 0C s21
Smagorinsky model:
Germano procedure:
⟨ .⟩ - denotes average)(
Reimplementation of DMM
ij−13kkij=ij
a= ui u j−ui u jLijm
a−2C s2∣S∣ S ij
mixed model:
Germano procedure (different from previous):
M ij= 2∣S∣ S ij−2∣S∣ S ijLij=ui u j− ui u j
H ij=ui u j−
uiu j−ui u j−ui u j
C=C s2=−1
2Lij M ij−H ijM klM kl
● Explicit grid filter implemented
● To ensure stability: clipping of constant and Leonard stresses
0C s21
Clipping procedure for Leonard stress
Asymptotical estimations Simple clipping procedure
● Stress terms from multiple filtered quantities may get very large, depending on grid resolution
Risk of instability
● Clark approximation is used to determine upper limit for filtered quantities:
Appeared in Communications In Numerical Methods In Engineering 2006, 22:55-61
Validation – Channel flow
x
y
Cyclic boundary
U
z
y
H=2
L=4Cyclic boundary
B=2
Resolution (nX x n
Y x n
Z): 128 x 40 x 64
Re=180
U=15.66
Solver: channelOodles
Channel Flow – Reynolds Stress
R xx
R yy
y
Dynamic Mixed ModelDynamic Smagorinsky
R zz
Rey
nold
s st
ress
es
DMM Validation – Pitz & Daily case
x/H
U=13.3m/s Backward facing step:
● Geometry and mesh from “Xoodles” tutorial case● Solver: oodles
Streamwise velocity profiles at different positions:
H=0.025m
Outline● Introduction● Mixing Project
– SGS model implementations– Validation– Jet mixer simulations– Future work: inflow generator
● CIVB Project– Scope– Preliminary computations
Jet mixer – object of investigation
Ubulk
Ucoflow
L
Dd
●arrangement consists of pipe (diameter D) with coaxial nozzle (diameter d)
●fully developed turbulent flow in pipe (velocity Ucoflow
)●nozzle injects fluid with velocity U
bulk into pipe flow
●computational domain starts immediately behind nozzle (length L)
computationaldomain
Motivation●Investigation of micro-mixing in liquids●Jet mixer is of interest in chemical industry, applications are
● Homogenization● Chemical reactor
Jet mixer – flow modes
Jet like mode (A) Recirculation mode (B)
1V̇ D
V̇ dDd 1
V̇ D
V̇ dDd
Depending on volume flux ratio, two flow modes can be distinguished:
Time averaged mixture fraction fields
Jet mixer - investigations
Numerical● RANS (CFX 5)● LES (inhouse code)
– Dyn. Smagorinsky– DMM– Vortex Based Model
● LES (OpenFOAM)
Experimental● LIF (mixing)● LDA (velocities)
some limitations so far:● mixing only between fluids of equal density● no chemical reactions
LES of jet mixer - ResultsParameters of simulation●Pipe and nozzle diameter, velocities like in experimental setup●Resolution 700000 cells●Flow in Recirculation Mode (B)●Mixing water/water
r /D r /D
Axi
al V
eloc
ity U
Mix
ture
Fra
ctio
n f
Radial distribution at x/D=1.0
#
Jet mixer - Results
Mix
ture
Fra
ctio
n f
r /D r /D
Axi
al V
eloc
ity U
Radial distribution at x/D=1.5
Level of statistical modelling 1-point and time statistics
(Reynolds stress, kinetic energy)
1-point space and time statistics+
integral time and spatial length
1-point space and time statistics +
2-point space and time autocorrelations
Digital filter based method by (Klein et al. (2001))Spectral method (Lee et al (1992))Method of turbulent spots (Kornev et al. (2003))
2D random vortex method(Benhamadouche et al. (2003))Simple Random Generator (Lund et. al.(1998))……
Modified method of Kraichnan(Smirnov et al (2001), Batten et al.(2004))Diffusion approach (Kempf et al. (2005))2D random vortex method (FLUENT)……..
1
2
3
Inflow generation for LES/DNSIssue● Unsteady velocity boundary conditions must be prescribed at inlets● Common practice: adding white noise to mean profile or running
precursor simulationsBasic idea● Generation of artifical turbulence with prescribed statistical properties
Outline● Introduction● Mixing Project
– SGS model implementations– Validation– Jet mixer simulations– Future work: inflow generator
● CIVB Project– Scope– Preliminary computations
Vortex BreakdownCharacteristics●suddenly expansion of a rotating flow at some axial position●recirculation zone downstream
schematic
photograph
Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown
Normal operation●vortex breakdown enforced by suddenly expansion of geometry
●Stable position of flame at combustion chamber entry
●Flame burns in recirculation bubble
Mixing pipe combustion chamber
Flame flashback● Flame propagates into mixing pipe under certain conditions (high load)
● Reason: interaction of flame and vortex breakdown
Gas turbine combustion chamber
Results from research project at Technical University Munich
CIVB in free vortices - experimental setup
Research at University of Rostock: CIVB in a free rotating jet● aim: understanding mechanisms of
upstream flame propagation in vortices● Experimental studies:
● OH-PLIF: tracking flame front● PIV: velocity field
● Numerical studies (OpenFOAM)
burner
swirl generator
nozzle
Simulation of experimental setup – model
wall
U=0.1m/sSlip wall
nozzle
∂ U∂ n
=0
p=1 bar
15cm
L=0.4m
D=0
.5m
d=5c
m
Resolution: 750 000 cells
● Up to now only qualitative studies (no measurements)● Simplified setup (no burner, bluff body for holding flame)
methaneair
flame
Nozzle boundary conditions
Nozzle withconical inset
Nozzle withcylindrical inset
rr
r
1m/s 1m/s
2m/s2m/s2m/s
UV
Vel
ocity
pro
files
in n
ozzl
e ex
it
r=5mm
More concentrated vortex:delta wing trailing vortex
● Simulations differ only in velocity profile in nozzle exit area
Simulation sequence
RANS solver: stationary cold flow
LES of cold flow(with fuel transport)
Ignition
LES of combustion
Cylinder nozzle: flame development
t=tign
+20ms t=tign
+50ms t=tign
+80ms
Acceleration of flame against main flow direction
Trailing vortex: flame development
t=tign
+5ms t=tign
+35ms t=tign
+85ms
Acceleration of flame against main flow direction
Conclusion● Reimplementation of DMM model for
incompressible flows● Successful validation with turbulent
channel flow, backward facing step and coaxial jet mixer
● Identification of Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown in LES with premixed combustion
Future works on OpenFOAM
● DMM model for variable density flows (modification of explicit filtering)
● DMM model for scalar transport (extension of “LESmodel”-class necessary)
● Generator for turbulent inflow conditions with prescribed statistical properties
● Presumed PDF/ILDM method for combustion and detailed chemistry modelling