2
"Legwork" needed to validate talent metrics 13 April 2015 6:58am HR professionals should look inside their business rather than rely on external consultants' advice when deciding how to apply their talent metrics, says QBE's Dr John Chan. (Chan, who leads the Talent, Arch'T & Analytics practice globally for QBE Insurance Group, focuses on three areas to identify and develop talent using metrics – read more here.) Once data has been collected, it's important to consider the unique circumstances of the organisation it comes from, he says. "A good example is learning agility – there's a lot of research out there saying that those people with high learning agility will probably be more successful if you move them into different jobs. Some organisations will just take the consulting firm's word for that – the same consulting firm that's trying to sell you this tool," he says. "That's a great basis for us to try it but that doesn't mean it will always work in every organisation and every industry and also regionally, there might be a lot of differences. "Culturally, within different regions there are different norms for personality, cognitive ability and learning agility – if we're only using one cutoff for everybody out there you're going to miss people within different regions. "Don't just take the word of whoever is trying to sell you something, but actually do the legwork – do your own validation study to ensure those metrics actually do work within your organisation." Chan says that if this process is followed properly, talent metrics can actually predict the right outcomes for your organisation. "We make sure when we're looking for talent in Asia, what that scale looks like might be slightly different than the scale that we might look for in the US or Europe," he says. "Once you do have this validated data, you have the ability to do much better workforce planning. Let's say your organisation wanted to create new products or maybe go after a new group of clients in a different region. The question you'll be able to answer is, do you actually have people that can innovate or that actually know how to get into new markets, and if so, who are those people? Those are the kind of questions that when you have the proper metrics... you can answer for the organisation." What results can you expect? Chan says the benefits to QBE of effectively using talent metrics are borne out in longitudinal studies monitoring employees from the time they take their first job at the company.

Legwork needed to validate talent metrics - HR Daily

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Legwork needed to validate talent metrics - HR Daily

4/16/2015 Print Article - "Legwork" needed to validate talent metrics

http://www.hrdaily.com.au/nl06_news_print.php?selkey=3436 1/2

  

"Legwork" needed to validate talent metrics

13 April 2015 6:58am

HR professionals should look inside their business rather than rely on external consultants'advice when deciding how to apply their talent metrics, says QBE's Dr John Chan. 

(Chan, who leads the Talent, Arch'T & Analytics practice globally for QBE Insurance Group,focuses on three areas to identify and develop talent using metrics – read more here.) 

Once data has been collected, it's important to consider the unique circumstances of theorganisation it comes from, he says. 

"A good example is learning agility – there's a lot of research out there saying that those peoplewith high learning agility will probably be more successful if you move them into different jobs.Some organisations will just take the consulting firm's word for that – the same consulting firmthat's trying to sell you this tool," he says. 

"That's a great basis for us to try it but that doesn't mean it will always work in every organisationand every industry and also regionally, there might be a lot of differences. 

"Culturally, within different regions there are different norms for personality, cognitive ability andlearning agility – if we're only using one cutoff for everybody out there you're going to misspeople within different regions. 

"Don't just take the word of whoever is trying to sell you something, but actually do the legwork –do your own validation study to ensure those metrics actually do work within your organisation." 

Chan says that if this process is followed properly, talent metrics can actually predict the rightoutcomes for your organisation. 

"We make sure when we're looking for talent in Asia, what that scale looks like might be slightlydifferent than the scale that we might look for in the US or Europe," he says. 

"Once you do have this validated data, you have the ability to do much better workforceplanning. Let's say your organisation wanted to create new products or maybe go after a newgroup of clients in a different region. The question you'll be able to answer is, do you actuallyhave people that can innovate or that actually know how to get into new markets, and if so, whoare those people? Those are the kind of questions that when you have the proper metrics... youcan answer for the organisation." 

What results can you expect?

Chan says the benefits to QBE of effectively using talent metrics are borne out in longitudinalstudies monitoring employees from the time they take their first job at the company. 

Page 2: Legwork needed to validate talent metrics - HR Daily

4/16/2015 Print Article - "Legwork" needed to validate talent metrics

http://www.hrdaily.com.au/nl06_news_print.php?selkey=3436 2/2

"We've developed them over the years and they have moved on to much more senior roleswithin the organisation and we can tie that back," he says. "They had the initial ability, they hadthe aspiration and we've kept their motivation and engagement up and this is the result." 

And the benefits of this approach will always outweigh the cost of implementation. 

"Having that people data is the biggest make­or­break differentiator for any organisation,especially the more service­based organisations that aren't actually making 'things', they arerelying purely on people's talent. 

"You're going to have a lot more information by your side to be able to make really big decisions– imagine the value that will have for the business as it sets its goals," he says. 

"Even decisions like hiring the right person versus the wrong person. Just imagine the cost ofputting in a wrong executive and the effects that can have on the bottom line and theorganisation. 

"The cost for putting in the wrong person by far outweighs whatever the cost is to do this type ofresearch," he says. 

Dr John Chan is a presenter at the Business Driven HR Metrics Forum in Sydney this week. 

This is HR Daily Premium content. To browse more premium articles and webcasts clickhere.

related articles

Make HR metrics useful for business leadersWhy HR should calculate the cost of people riskData analysis debunks "assumed best practice", says specialistStop "measuring history" ­ plan with meaningful dataHow to move from data reporting to effective analyticsMore on metrics, analytics and data

© Copyright HR Daily 2015   All articles in HR Daily are protected by © Copyright