59
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation Legislation

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

LEGISLATIVE UPDATELEGISLATIVE UPDATE

2012 – Developments in Design Legislation2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Page 2: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Pending Design Legislation

Repair Parts – “PARTS Act”H.R. 3889 (2012)

Fashion Design Sui Generis ProtectionH.R. 2511 (2011)S. 3523 (2012)

Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012S. 3486 (2012)H.R. 6432 (2012)

Page 3: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

PARTS Act

Full title - "Promoting Automotive Repair, Trade, and Sales Act"

Page 4: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

PARTS Act

Full title - "Promoting Automotive Repair, Trade, and Sales Act"

Generally seeks to limit design patent protection for parts used to repair motor vehicles, by eliminating infringement for

Page 5: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

PARTS Act

Full title - "Promoting Automotive Repair, Trade, and Sales Act"

Generally seeks to limit design patent protection for parts used to repair motor vehicles, by eliminating infringement for

1) non-OEM manufacturer’s development of parts

Page 6: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

PARTS Act

Full title - "Promoting Automotive Repair, Trade, and Sales Act"

Generally seeks to limit design patent protection for parts used to repair motor vehicles, by eliminating infringement for

1) non-OEM manufacturer’s development of parts 2) selling/using parts after 30 mos. from 1st sale offer

Page 7: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

PARTS Act

Full title - "Promoting Automotive Repair, Trade, and Sales Act"

Generally seeks to limit design patent protection for parts used to repair motor vehicles, by eliminating infringement for

1) non-OEM manufacturer’s development of parts 2) selling/using parts after 30 mos. from 1st sale offer

Hearing before Judiciary Committee in August; bill is still in Committee

Page 8: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sui Generis Protection for Fashion Designs

H.R. 2511 – Innovative Design Protection & Piracy Prevention Act

Page 9: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sui Generis Protection for Fashion Designs

H.R. 2511 – Innovative Design Protection & Piracy Prevention Act

Protects the overall appearance of a fashion design

Page 10: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sui Generis Protection for Fashion Designs

H.R. 2511 – Innovative Design Protection & Piracy Prevention Act

Protects the overall appearance of a fashion design

3 year term of protection

Page 11: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sui Generis Protection for Fashion Designs

H.R. 2511 – Innovative Design Protection & Piracy Prevention Act

Protects the overall appearance of a fashion design

3 year term of protection

Heightened pleading standard

Page 12: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sui Generis Protection for Fashion Designs

H.R. 2511 – Innovative Design Protection & Piracy Prevention Act

Protects the overall appearance of a fashion design

3 year term of protection

Heightened pleading standard

Recovery requires notice and knowledge

Page 13: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sui Generis Protection for Fashion Designs

H.R. 2511 – Innovative Design Protection & Piracy Prevention Act

Protects the overall appearance of a fashion design

3 year term of protection

Heightened pleading standard

Recovery requires notice and knowledge

Remedies

Page 14: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3523 – Innovative Design Protection Act

How does it differ from H.R. 2511?

Page 15: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3523 – Innovative Design Protection Act

How does it differ from H.R. 2511?

- Differences are minimal

Page 16: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3523 – Innovative Design Protection Act

How does it differ from H.R. 2511?

- Differences are minimal

- Introduces a 21-day notice requirement

Page 17: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3523 – Innovative Design Protection Act

How does it differ from H.R. 2511?

- Differences are minimal

- Introduces a 21-day notice requirement

- Written Notice

Page 18: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3523 – Innovative Design Protection Act

How does it differ from H.R. 2511?

- Differences are minimal

- Introduces a 21-day notice requirement

- Written Notice that “specifies how the allegedly infringing design infringed upon the protected design”

Page 19: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3523 – Innovative Design Protection Act

How does it differ from H.R. 2511?

- Differences are minimal

- Introduces a 21-day notice requirement

- Written Notice that “specifies how the allegedly infringing design infringed upon the protected design”

Bill was passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, but not yet by the full Senate

Page 20: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3486 – Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012

Page 21: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3486 – Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012

1st Bill Introduced to Implement the Geneva Act

Page 22: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3486 – Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012

1st Bill Introduced to Implement the Geneva Act

Based on previous legislative recommendations from the USPTO and Dept of Commerce

Page 23: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3486 – Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012

1st Bill Introduced to Implement the Geneva Act

Based on previous legislative recommendations from the USPTO and Dept of Commerce

Implements the Geneva Act within the post-America Invents Act Scheme

Page 24: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

S. 3486 – Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012

1st Bill Introduced to Implement the Geneva Act

Based on previous legislative recommendations from the USPTO and Dept of Commerce

Implements the Geneva Act within the post-America Invents Act Scheme

Full Senate has passed the bill; sent to House

House bill is identical to Senate Bill

Page 25: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

2006-06-01 25

S. 3486 – Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012

1st Bill Introduced to Implement the Geneva Act

Based on previous legislative recommendations from the USPTO and Dept of Commerce

Implements the Geneva Act within the post-America Invents Act Scheme

House bill is identical to Senate Bill

Page 26: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Geneva Act of the Hague System

Meetings of Experts 1992-1999

Page 27: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Geneva Act of the Hague System

Meetings of Experts 1992-1999

Finalized – July 1999

Page 28: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Geneva Act of the Hague System

Meetings of Experts 1992-1999

Finalized – July 1999

Senate Ratification – December 2007

Page 29: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Geneva Act of the Hague System

Meetings of Experts 1992-1999

Finalized – July 1999

Senate Ratification – December 2007

First Implementation Bill introduced – August 2012

Page 30: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sources of Law for Hague System in US

Treaty

Treaty Regulations

Declarations from Senate Ratification

Implementation Legislation

USPTO Regulations (forthcoming)

Page 31: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

What Is In S. 3486?

Page 32: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

What Is In S. 3486?

Bill seeks to enact two Treaties:

Page 33: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

What Is In S. 3486?

Bill seeks to enact two Treaties:- Geneva Act

Page 34: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

What Is In S. 3486?

Bill seeks to enact two Treaties:- Geneva Act- Patent Law Treaty

Page 35: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

What Is In S. 3486?

Bill seeks to enact two Treaties:- Geneva Act- Patent Law Treaty

Three Sections in Title I:

Page 36: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

What Is In S. 3486?

Bill seeks to enact two Treaties:- Geneva Act- Patent Law Treaty

Three Sections in Title I:- International Design Applications (Sec. 101)- Conforming Amendments (Sec. 102)- Effective Date (Sec. 103)

Page 37: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 101 – International Design Applications

Security Review applies to Int’l Design Applications

Page 38: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 101 – International Design Applications

Security Review applies to Int’l Design ApplicationsDirector has the ability to review the filing date of

International Design Applications

Page 39: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 101 – International Design Applications

Security Review applies to Int’l Design ApplicationsDirector has the ability to review the filing date of

International Design ApplicationsWithdrawn applications often will not serve as prior art

in the U.S.

Page 40: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 101 – International Design Applications

Security Review applies to Int’l Design ApplicationsDirector has the ability to review the filing date of

International Design ApplicationsWithdrawn applications often will not serve as prior art

in the U.S.Substantive for examination of international design

applications

Page 41: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 101 – International Design Applications

Security Review applies to Int’l Design ApplicationsDirector has the ability to review the filing date of

International Design ApplicationsWithdrawn applications often will not serve as prior art

in the U.S.Substantive for examination of international design

applicationsInternational design applications may ultimately issue

as a US Design Patent

Page 42: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 101 – International Design Applications

Security Review applies to Int’l Design ApplicationsDirector has the ability to review the filing date of

International Design ApplicationsWithdrawn applications often will not serve as prior art

in the U.S.Substantive for examination of international design

applicationsInternational design applications may ultimately issue

as a US Design Patent

Page 43: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 102 – Conforming Amendments

Allows international applications to serve as the basis for, or receive priority from other applications

Page 44: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 102 – Conforming Amendments

Allows international applications to serve as the basis for, or receive priority from other applications

Prevents provisional applications from receiving priority from International Design applications

Page 45: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 102 – Conforming Amendments

Allows international applications to serve as the basis for, or receive priority from other applications

Prevents provisional applications from receiving priority from International Design applications

Changes the term of all US Design Patents from 14 years to 15 years

Page 46: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 102 – Conforming Amendments

Allows international applications to serve as the basis for, or receive priority from other applications

Prevents provisional applications from receiving priority from International Design applications

Changes the term of all US Design Patents from 14 years to 15 years

Grants provisional rights for published International Design Applications

Page 47: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 103 – Effective Date

The Act will go into effect the later of

Page 48: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 103 – Effective Date

The Act will go into effect the later of - 1 year from enactment, or

Page 49: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 103 – Effective Date

The Act will go into effect the later of - 1 year from enactment, or - The date of into force of the treaty.

Page 50: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Sec. 103 – Effective Date

The Act will go into effect the later of - 1 year from enactment, or - The date of into force of the treaty.

The provisions of Ch. 38 only pertain to applications filed on or after effective date

Page 51: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Departing Thoughts

Page 52: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Departing Thoughts

After so long, it’s finally here.

Page 53: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Departing Thoughts

After so long, it’s finally here.

Both House and Senate bills have bi-partisan support.

Page 54: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

Departing Thoughts

After so long, it’s finally here.

Both House and Senate bills have bi-partisan support.

Statute and Treaty leave important aspects of the application process up to the USPTO, so rule-making process will be key.

Page 55: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

FAQ's re Geneva Act Implementation

How much will filing cost?

Page 56: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

FAQ's re Geneva Act Implementation

How much will filing cost?

12 month automatic issuance

Page 57: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

FAQ's re Geneva Act Implementation

How much will filing cost?

12 month automatic issuance

How will US applicants be able to access the System?

Page 58: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

FAQ's re Geneva Act Implementation

How much will filing cost?

12 month automatic issuance

How will US applicants be able to access the System?

Where will they be able to gain protection?

Page 59: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2012 – Developments in Design Legislation

THANK YOU