Legislate the Competition

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 Legislate the Competition

    1/2

    polit ics

    legislatecompetitionstory and photos by lauren shaWHAT DO HEALTH CARE REFORM,

    HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT RATES,

    THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN ANDTHE NCAAS BOWL CHAMPIONSHIP

    SERIES HAVE IN COMMON?

    AN ARGUMENT IN CONGRESS.

    Thanks to Utah senator andUtes fan, Orrin Hatch, thequestion of how college footballs

    outright national champion should

    be decided has entered the mix of

    issues at hand in Congress. Hatch

    wrote a 10-page letter to Presi-

    dent Barack Obama in October

    expressing the urgency of reform-

    ing the current BCS into a playoff.

    He based his argument on a likely

    violation of the Sherman Anti-

    trust Act, saying the bowl system

    artificially limits the number of

    nationally relevant bowl games

    to five, which results in limited

    opportunities for revenue and

    spotlight for schools in smaller

    Division I-A conferences. Such a

    practice constitutes, to quote from

    the law, a contract, combinationin the form of trust or otherwise,

    or conspiracy, in restraint of trade

    or commerce, Hatch argues.

    While Hatch, the top republican

    on the Senate Judiciary Subcom-

    mittee on Antitrust, made his

    assertion on a legitimate political

    basis, perhaps the true foundation

    of his argument is personal. In

    2008, the University of Utah Utes

    of the Mountain West Conference

    went undefeated in regular seasonplay but fell into the shadows of

    the more dominant Southeastern

    and Big-12 Conferences for the

    chance at the national title.

    Samford University President

    Andy Westmoreland says he

    doesnt buy the allegation. Al-

    ways involved in something like

    that is somebody whose team is

    not faring well, he says.

    Hatch, though, is not the onlysomebody in Congress advocat-

    ing the change. Reps. Joe Bar-

    ton of Texas and Bobby Rush of

    Illinois sponsored a bill passed

    in December by a House Energy

    and Commerce Committee sub-

    committee that would make it il-

    legal to promote a national cham-

    pionship game unless it resulted

    from a playoff.

    These government officials haveexercised their power out of self-

    ish desire and not selfless service

    to their country, and not all their

    colleagues appreciate it. Subcom-

    mittee member Rep. John Barrow

    of Georgia, although he does not

    like the BCS, told ESPN.com,

    With all due respect, I really

    think we have more important

    things to spend our time on.

    BCS administration, university

    officials, college football coachesand those directly associated with

    the sport agree. BCS executive

    director Bill Hancock told ESPN.

    com that Congress surely has

    more important ways to spend

    taxpayer money than to dictate

    how college football is played.

    If Ive ever seen a case for the

    government to stay out of, this is

    it, Westmoreland says. It seems

    to be the worst kind of govern-ment micromanaging.

    Westmoreland also points out that

    the government is much more

    concerned with this issue than

    the NCAA itself. As president of

    an NCAA institution, Westmore-

    land is directly involved with the

    organization and receives regular

    updates on issues and develop-

    ments. The evolution of the bowl

    system into a playoff system isnt

    typically covered in such infor-mation. Westmoreland said its

    because of all the NCAA institu-

    tions in Divisions I, II and III,

    this particular issue affects only a

    small percentage of universities.

    I dont know if this is a surprise,

    but it doesnt pop up that often,

    he says. The greater concerns

    are about scholarship equivalen-

    cies for other sports and schedul-

    the

  • 8/4/2019 Legislate the Competition

    2/2

    ing and more mundane issues.

    This is a Hollywood-type inter-

    est.

    Indeed football fanatics and, now,

    government officials have spot-

    lighted this issue to appear much

    more urgent than it really is.

    Those directly involved arent in

    any hurry to implement a playoffbecause they believe the bowl

    system works. In fact, according

    to the Orlando (Fla.) Sentinel, a

    Jan. 12 survey of all 120 Divi-

    sion I-A coaches said 73 percent

    wanted to keep the current sys-tem.

    Even Texas Christian Univer-

    sity head coach Gary Patterson,

    whose undefeated team got

    bypassed for the 2009 national

    championship game, says he is

    an advocate. A playoff system

    wouldnt make it any easier for

    his smaller Division I-A team to

    make it to the top, he says.

    Samford University head footballcoach Pat Sullivan, who once

    was head coach at TCU, has

    experienced both systems and

    said pros and cons exist in each.

    Before arriving at Samford, he

    was on the coaching staff at the

    University of Alabama-Birming-

    ham, who also competes for a

    chance to end the season with

    a bowl game. Samford, on the

    other hand, though Division I, is

    in the football championship sub-

    division and competes for a spot

    in the playoffs.

    When I was in Division I-A, I

    liked the bowl system becauseit gave a lot of kids who had the

    opportunity to go to a bowl game

    the chance to have an experi-

    ence they would carry with them

    for the rest of their lives, Sul-

    livan says. In the championshipsystem that were in now, I look

    forward to it. It gives us a goal

    and something to strive for.

    He says he doesnt prefer one

    system over the other, and the

    governments push shows the

    evolution of media coverage and

    the power of the dollar.

    And money, Westmoreland says,

    is what keeps many schools in

    the business of the bowl game.With the BCS as

    it exists, it is a cash

    bonanza for the

    institutions, and so,

    understandably, the

    institutions that have

    done well under the

    system are not too inclined to

    make changes, he says. The

    playoff system at our level works

    because it is more about playing

    the game and the honor of all of

    it rather than millions of dollars

    flowing to the institution.

    Westmoreland added that the

    money that flows to the NCAAmost likely contributes to the

    stabilization of the bowl system.

    The television revenue from the

    31 bowl games is so immense

    that it drives the majority of

    NCAA budget considerations, he

    says.

    However, football fans in Con-

    gress arent concerned with mon-

    ey, but fairness. Westmoreland

    said that while the bowl system is

    often perceived as unfair, passing

    a bill for its removal wont take

    away the problems. If you try to

    recreate it in some way with the

    government exercising some kind

    of control, youre going to have

    the same kind of issues applied,

    maybe not a congressman in

    Utah, but a congressman in Geor-

    gia whos miffed about it, so they

    get into trying to alter it again,

    he says. The government needsto stay out of this.

    exodus33

    IF IVE EVER SEEN A CASE FOR THE GOVERNMENT

    TO STAY OUT OF, THIS IS IT. IT SEEMS TO BE THE

    WORST KIND OF GOVERNMENT MICROMANAGING.

    t: South Carolina at Tennessee, Oct. 31, 2009. right: South Carolinaat Alabama, Oct. 17, 2009. All three SEC teams qualifed for a bowlappearance, with the Alabama Crimson Tide becoming the BCS

    champions.

    e