Upload
bryan-hubbard
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT
Purpose of Law
To protect consumers, competitors, employees, suppliers, investors,
society, and the environment from possible unfair treatment or
exploitation by the businesses and each other.
Legal SystemThere are two types of legal systems:
1) Common Law
2) Code Law
However, in most countries, a combination of the two is usually practiced.
Common Law
Common law is a tradition-based practice.
The interpretation of what the law means on a given subject is influenced
by previous court decisions.
If there is no specific precedent or
statute, common law requires a court to make a decision that, in
affect, will create a new law.
Common law is practiced in the United States of America.
Code Law
Code law (also known as Civil law) is based on a comprehensive set of laws
organized into a code.
Rather than rely on precedent or court interpretation, the code is intended to spell out the law in all possible
situations.
Code law is practiced in countries including Germany, France, Japan
and Russia.
Mixed
Most countries have legal systems that rely on a mixture of both Code
and Common law.
Usually , the source of Code is based on tradition and/or religion.
Both Code and Common law countries recognize the enforceability
of mutual promises.
Under Code law, however, contracts carry with them a number of implicit
promises that are enforceable, whereas under the Common law
contract a promise must be part of the contract to be enforceable.
International Legal Environment
All countries realize that business flourishes when there exists mutual
trust, orderly conduct, and enforceability of contracts, and,
thus they seek to provide such an environment.
The trouble, however, is that though
law and order exists in the domestic setting of countries, the same cannot
be applied outside their political environment.
Multinational firms, therefore, face legal systems of a multitude of countries, each one of which is
independent of the other.
Ironically, this situation also leads to flourishing business.
Due to lack of unifying legal system that applies across political boundaries, multinational
corporations have the ability to utilize the laws of a variety of nations in a way that they are
unaffected by any one country’s laws.
Example: Crude oil from Iran.
For most firms, however, lack of a uniform legal framework creates
problems in promoting cross-border trade and investment.
Example: Performance bonds of U.S. firms in Iraq
International Law
Is a set of international agreements (bilateral and multilateral) between
sovereign countries that represent the most deliberate form of prescription in which governments cooperate with one another in explicitly formulating
and undertaking commitments.
The main purpose of these agreements
is to devise consistent rules that can facilitate, among other things, travel,
stay, investment, crime prevention between countries.
Some important types of international agreements made by countries include:
• Treaties of friendship, commerce, and navigation
• Treaties on taxation
• Agreements for transfer of technology and for exchange of technical personnel
• Conventions for the protection of human rights
One of the problems, however, is that unlike the domestic legal system,
the international legal system is decentralized.
Each country becomes a power center
and no country or no multilateral agency has sufficient authority and
resources to make, apply, and enforce law and adjudicate disputes.
In a broader sense, securing compliance depends largely on
reciprocity, retaliation and relevant expectations.
The real policing and stabilizing power comes from the shared
perception of common interests.
When countries realize that they have more to gain through cooperation
than through arbitrary claims, they learn to act with restraint.
Friendship , commerce and navigation treaties
These pertain to entry of individuals, goods, ships and cargoes, capital,
acquisition of property, protection of persons and property and transfer of
funds.
Tax treaties:
Tax treaties (usually bilateral) are designed to provide relief from
double taxation and prevent evasion of tax liability.
The objective of these treaties is to specify the obligations of each
contracting country toward the other country’s citizens, firms, and their
assets.
The ideal situation is to achieve “national” treatment of foreign
nationals of the contracting countries.
National Treatment
National treatment implies that foreign citizens and their properties
must receive the same legal protection that the citizens of the country granting the “national”
treatment receive.
There are many areas where national treatment can create problems,
especially if the laws of the foreign country granting ”national”
treatment are less stringent than the laws of the other country.
For example, if a particular country has a rule that says that no inventor,
whether national or foreign, is entitled to receive a patent on a
pharmaceutical invention, all other countries should accept the rule because it provides “national”
treatment.
Another area where “national” treatment creates problem is taxation.
The national treatment suggests that a foreign individual or firm must pay
taxes to the country where it operates.
However, they are also subject to their home country taxes, thus ending up
with double taxes.
Host Country Laws on Business
Even if the legal systems are similar on two countries, it does not mean that the laws in those countries will be similar.
• Laws relating to entry of goods
• Laws relating to entry of firms
• Laws relating to business operations
• Laws relating to competition
Home Country Laws
Until the goods or capital has left the country, it is subject to the
regulations of the home country.
•Laws relating to export
•Laws relating to outgoing investment
•Laws relating to competition
•Laws relating to corporate conduct
Some countries may, however enforce their laws on their firms overseas as
well.
This is called Extra-Territorial Enforcement.
Extra-Territoriality of U.S. Export Laws
Any product of U.S. origin that is re-exported from the original importing
country must obtain an export license from the U.S. government.
The same applies in case a product is made overseas but contains U.S. made components or incorporates U.S.
technology.
This law applies not only to the subsidiaries of U.S. firms but to
foreign firms as well.
Extra-Territoriality of U.S. Anti-trust Laws
U.S. government can prevent any U.S. firm acquiring another firm, domestic or foreign, that may, in
turn, provide the U.S. firm a dominant competitive position in a
particular industry.
Extra-Territoriality of U.S. Corporate Conduct
Prohibits American firms from the use of telephone and mail in furtherance of a payment, or even an offer to pay “anything of value” directly or indirectly, to any foreign political party or foreign political candidate, if the purpose of the payment is the “corrupt” one of getting the recipient to act (or refrain from acting), retaining business for or with, or directing business to, any person.
The term “foreign official” does not include any government employee
whose duties are “essentially clerical”.
Payments made to such minor officials are called “grease” or “facilitating” payments when they are made to get them to perform customary services that they might refuse to perform, or perform very slowly, in the absence
of such payments.
The word “corruptly” is used to make clear that the offer, payment,
promise, or gift is intended to induce the recipient to misuse him or her
official position to wrongfully direct business to the payer or to obtain
preferential legislation for the payer.
Resolving Disputes
In international setting, two types of disputes are common:
1- Those over contract rights and duties
2- Those arising from governmental attempts to alter the contract through a change in operating rules
It should be noted that a change in rules that merely makes the business
less profitable is not a violation of international law.
If the actions of host governments are more intensive, for example,
expropriation of assets, the foreign investor may seek to recoup losses in a foreign court (other than the
host country).
However, the investor may confront
two international law doctrine:
- The act of state doctrine and
- The doctrine of sovereign immunity
The Act of State DoctrineThe government has the right to exercise its sovereign power.
In doing so, it urges the foreign courts to not examine the validity of act of state that results in expropriation.
If the doctrine is deemed applicable, the foreign court will not examine and decide the claims on its merits.
The Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity
The concept of sovereign immunity calls into question whether the
domestic court has jurisdiction over a foreign state (or its conduct) at all.
Accordingly, a sovereign country can not, without giving consent, be made
to answer in the courts of another nation, especially in matters relating to public acts (as opposed to private
acts).
Other alternatives for solving expropriation disputes:
• litigation in national courts
• international arbitration
The litigation of an international dispute involves the application of
both domestic and international law by a domestic court.
The purpose of the private international laws is to:
• Prescribe the conditions under which a
particular domestic court may hear such a suit.
• Determine the particular system of law by which the rights of the parties must be decided.
• Specify the circumstances in which foreign judgement can be recognized of enforced.
Litigations are usually very expensive. Court room battles can:
• damage business relations
• provoke unfavorable publicity
• absorb countless hours of management time
Due to these difficulties, many
firms are subscribing to alternate forms of dispute
resolution.